16
Quality Of Service and MObility driven cognitive radio Systems Quality Of Service and MObility driven cognitive radio Systems Requirements for a CR-system Requirements for a CR-system Challenges compared to conventional wireless technology technology Per H. Lehne 1 , Dominique Noguet 2 , Rohit Datta 3 Ul i Cl t 4 Vi t Mé t 5 Phili Dlh 5 Ulrico Celentano 4 , Vincent rat 5 , Philippe Delahaye 5 Gerhard Fettweis 3 1 2 1 Telenor Corporate Development, 2 CEA-LETI, 3 Vodafone Chair, TU Dresden, 4 University of Oulu, 5 Nec Technologies UK, Ltd., ‘The research leading to these results was derived from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) under Grant Agreement number 248454 (QoSMOS)’.

Requirements for a CR-system [0.8] · – Rethinking of QoS requirements for opportunistic users • Consider users’ expectations at large more than individual QoS metrics • Has

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    14

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Quality Of Service and MObility driven cognitive radio SystemsQuality Of Service and MObility driven cognitive radio Systems

Requirements for a CR-systemRequirements for a CR-systemChallenges compared to conventional wireless

technologytechnology

Per H. Lehne1, Dominique Noguet2, Rohit Datta3

Ul i C l t 4 Vi t Mé t5 Phili D l h 5Ulrico Celentano4, Vincent Mérat5, Philippe Delahaye5

Gerhard Fettweis3

1 21Telenor Corporate Development, 2CEA-LETI,3Vodafone Chair, TU Dresden, 4University of Oulu,

5Nec Technologies UK, Ltd.,

‘The research leading to these results was derived from theEuropean Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) under

Grant Agreement number 248454 (QoSMOS)’.

ContentsContents

• Introduction and background• Reliable services over unreliableReliable services over unreliable

resources?R l t it ti• Regulatory situation

• ChallengesC a e ges• The QoSMOS approach to requirements• Conclusions

WInnComm - Europe 201123.06.2011 2

Introduction and backgroundIntroduction and background• The QoSMOS project:• The QoSMOS project:

– Quality of Service and MObility driven cognitive radio Systems• A research project in EU’s 7th framework program• Runs from 2010 – 2012 (3 years)• Lead by BT (UK) – 15 partners

• QoSMOS’ focus is on mobile services and QoS, which introduces new challenges and possibilities, such as:

– More dynamic frequency situation when moving– Handover with no dedicated spectrum

Handling of QoS when the frequency resource varies– Handling of QoS when the frequency resource varies – QoS class can be linked to frequency choice

and can be input to the spectrum management process

Q SMOS ill h d d l th t l d t h i th t llQoSMOS will research and develop the tools and techniques that allow opportunistic use of radio spectrum where users are moving, while receiving a managed QoS

WInnComm - Europe 201123.06.2011 3

Reliable services over unreliable resources?

Wireless communications face a general challenge in• Wireless communications face a general challenge in that the medium is inherently unreliable with large link-quality variations:

• Additional challenges with CR:• Additional challenges with CR:– Frequency planning must be ”instantenous”– Transceiver must be extremely agile– Co-existence is a key requirement

• Not only primary users – also other opportunistic users

WInnComm - Europe 201123.06.2011 4

Regulatory situationRegulatory situationR l ti f t i ti t h• Regulations for opportunistic spectrum access has just started

• Attention is on protection of incumbents– Transmitter power levels (power management)p (p g )– Interference avoidance (sensing, geolocation)– Channel evacuation (response time)

• A general unpredictability of the spectrumavailabilityavailability– TV Whitespace has got the first attention– When do other bands follow?

WInnComm - Europe 201123.06.2011 5

Challenges (1)Challenges (1)

• Keeping track of available spectrum

• Stems from high level requirements on:– Incumbent users have the “right-of-way” (interference avoidance)

Other opportunistic users have the same “right” to shared access– Other opportunistic users have the same right to shared access (Coexistence between systems)

• Has a direct influence on:– Radio Resource Management (RRM) now includes spectrumg ( ) p

management (SM)– Mobility Management (MM) now includes spectrum mobility

Add d biliti ( f d t b t i )– Added new capabilities (use of databases, spectrum sensing)WInnComm - Europe 2011

23.06.2011 6

Challenges (2)Challenges (2)

• Providing QoS and mobility when access is opportunistic

• An impossible combination?

– Fair treatment among secondary users• Managing ”greedy” users• Common in cellular systems by imposing limits on throughput/download per user

– Rethinking of QoS requirements for opportunistic users• Consider users’ expectations at large more than individual QoS metrics

• Has a direct influence on:– QoS policies– Mobility Management; quickly relocating users – spectrum mobilityob ty a age e t; qu c y e ocat g use s spect u ob ty

WInnComm - Europe 201123.06.2011 7

Setting requirements:The QoSMOS approach

• Frequency flexibility– Distinction between frequency-dependent and

frequency-independent part of the system.

• Requirement categories addressing:– System operations and performancey p p– Flexibility and scalability

• Responding to the challenges

WInnComm - Europe 201123.06.2011 8

The QoSMOS approach:ppFrequency flexibility

System architecture

Radio environmentmapping and

sensing

Spectrummanagement

f k

QoS and mobilityhandling

Physical layer and transceiver

hit t

No frequency High frequency

framework architecture

No frequencydependence

High frequencydependence

The QoSMOS system is the complete set of functions and modules which is being specified and d i d i th j tdesigned in the project.A QoSMOS realization is an implementation of those functions and modules of the complete QoSMOS system which is necessary to fulfil the requirements (functional, regulatory, performance) of operation under the constraints of a certain scenario and region.A QoSMOS deployment is the delivery, installation, and testing of the QoSMOS realization in order to p y y gput it in operational state.

WInnComm - Europe 201123.06.2011 9

The QoSMOS approach:ppRequirements categories

• CompetitivenessBusiness, user and

service relatedrequirementsrequirements

• Regulatory complianceSystem operation

related Regulatory compliancerequirements

T h i l fPerformance

l t d • Technical performancerelatedrequirements

Architecture and• Flexibility and scalability

Architecture and complexity related

requirements

WInnComm - Europe 201123.06.2011 10

The QoSMOS approach:ppSystem operations

• Regulatory compliance• Regulatory compliance– Co-existence– Context awareness (sensing, geolocation)

Underlay and interweave spectrum sharing– Underlay and interweave spectrum sharing– Interference avoidance and incumbent protection

• Before setting an opportunistic transmission• Before setting an opportunistic transmission– Detect any incumbent system presence – Guarantee that the coverage area of the secondary system do not

include any incumbent victim deviceinclude any incumbent victim device• When the opportunistic transmission is set

– Track the potential apparition of an incumbent signal– Escape from the band whenever this situation occursEscape from the band whenever this situation occurs

• FCC and CEPT has defined requirements for this in the TVWS

WInnComm - Europe 201123.06.2011 11

The QoSMOS approach:ppPerformance

• Technical requirements– Managed QoS (traffic classes, interworking,

priority service re-start)priority, service re-start)– Mobility (user and terminal, spectrum mobility)– Spectrum utilization (out-of-band radiation,

t ffi i )spectrum efficiency)

– Ability to detect incumbents (means, sensitivity)

– Ability to adapt transmitted power (power management)

– Ability to leave the band when incumbents switch on (response time)

WInnComm - Europe 201123.06.2011 12

The QoSMOS approach:ppFlexibility and scalability

• Interfaces• Interfaces– Interworking with other opportunistic systems– Geolocation database

Regulations and policies database– Regulations and policies database• QoSMOS can be based on different

RATs– Targeting different scenarios– Targeting different scenarios– Exchange of control data– Measurement reports

• Flexible architectureFlexible architecture– Different scenarios– Distribution of decision making

functions (centralized vs(decentralized)

• Scalability– A high number of terminals and network nodes

WInnComm - Europe 201123.06.2011 13

The QoSMOS approach:ppResponding to the challenges

Challenge:

Kee

ping

ckof

ctru

m

QoS

and

bi

lity

byA

1: K

trac

spec

2: Q

Mob

OSA

Frequency flexibility XSpectrum sensing; support and performance XGeo-location; accuracy and interfaces XConte t information collection and response XContext-information; collection and response XLogical common channel X XRegulation and policy information X XRegulation and policy information X XQoS interworking X XUser, terminal and spectrum mobility XPhysical and spectrum handover support X X

WInnComm - Europe 201123.06.2011 14

ConclusionsConclusionsT j h ll• Two major challenges:– Keeping track of spectrum– Providing managed QoS and mobility

• Calls for additional functionality and flexibility:– Spectrum sensing– Geo-location– Additional interfaces

• The QoSMOS system requirement addressesThe QoSMOS system requirement addressesthese challenges through the system requirementsq

WInnComm - Europe 201123.06.2011 15

Where to get more infoWhere to get more infoD1 2 “Q SMOS lid t d i ”• D1.2 “QoSMOS consolidated scenarios”

• D1.4 ”QoSMOS consolidated system requirements”q

• D2 2 “System architecture options for the• D2.2 System architecture options for the QoSMOS system”

• And much more at www.ict-qosmos.eu

WInnComm - Europe 201123.06.2011 16