Upload
kristiina-avela
View
214
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CORRESPONDENCE
Response to ‘‘Lateral Meningocele Syndrome andHajdu–Cheney Syndrome: Different Disorders WithOverlapping Phenotypes’’ by GrippKristiina Avela,1* and Outi M€akitie2
1V€aest€oliitto, The Family Federation of Finland, Department of Medical Genetics, Helsinki, Finland2The Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Received 24 March 2011; Accepted 7 April 2011
TO THE EDITOR:We are grateful for the important correspondence by Dr. Karen W.
Gripp [2011]. The findings in our patient indeed closely resemble
those reported in lateral meningocele syndrome. As Dr. Gripp
states acro-osteolysis has not been reported in the lateral
meningocele syndrome. The distal phalanges of the first toes in
our patient were suggestive of acro-osteolysis and also the bone
resorption marker urine N-telopeptide of type I collagen (U-NTx)
was significantly elevated suggesting increased osteolysis. Our
patient’s facial appearance resembles that of patients with
lateral meningocele syndrome, but they are also similar to the
Hajdu–Cheney syndrome patients reported by Ad�es et al. [1993]
and Tanimoto et al. [1996]. Both of these patients presented with
acro-osteolysis but did not have lateral meningocele or dural
ectasia.
The full phenotype of the Hajdu–Cheney syndrome typically
presents in adulthood with relatively subtle facial changes
[Brennan and Pauli, 2001]. One may wonder whether there
actually exist two subtypes of the syndrome: the more common
adult-onset form with subtle facial findings [Brennan and Pauli,
2001] in addition to the typical Hajdu–Cheney skeleton, and a
rare congenital form with major malformations and a distinctive
facial appearance [Ad�es et al., 1993; Tanimoto et al., 1996; Avela et
al., 2011].
Our patient presents with manifestations of lateral meningocele
syndrome and Hajdu–Cheney syndrome. We agree with Dr.
Gripp that these conditions may be due to mutations in genes
whose products interact with each other, or affect the same
pathway.
REFERENCES
Ad�es LC, Morris LL, Haan EA. 1993. Hydrocephalus in Hajdu–Cheneysyndrome. J Med Genet 30:175.
Avela K, Valanne L, Helenius I, M€akitie O. 2011. Hajdu–Cheney syndromewith severe dural ectasia. Am J Med Genet Part A 155:595–598.
Brennan A, Pauli RM. 2001. Hajdu–Cheney syndrome: Evolution ofphenotype and clinical problems. Am J Med Genet 100:292–310.
Gripp K. 2011. Lateral meningocele syndrome and Hajdu–Cheney syn-drome: Different disorders with overlapping phenotypes. Am J MedGenet 155(in press).
Tanimoto A, Tamaki N, Nagashima T, Nakamura M. 1996. Syringomyeliaassociated with Hajdu–Cheney syndrome: Case report. Neurosurgery39:400–403.
*Correspondence to:
Kristiina Avela, M.D., Ph.D., V€aestoliitto, The Family Federation of
Finland, Department of Medical Genetics, P.O. Box 849, FIN-00101
Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: [email protected]
Published online 9 June 2011 in Wiley Online Library
(wileyonlinelibrary.com).
DOI 10.1002/ajmg.a.34085
How to Cite this Article:Avela K, M€akitie O. 2011. Response to
‘‘Lateral Meningocele Syndrome and
Hajdu–Cheney Syndrome: Different
Disorders With Overlapping Phenotypes’’ by
Gripp.
Am J Med Genet Part A 155:1775.
� 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc. 1775