Restoration versus New construction

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Restoration versus New construction

    1/8

    versus

    NEWCONSTRUCTION

    COMPARATIVEANALYSISFOREXISTINGGOVERNMENTQUARTERSINRAJASTHAN

    Arch i t ec t u re & Resto ra t ion Plann ing & Deve lopment

    53, New Rajdhani Enclave, Vikas Marg, Delhi-110 092Tel/fax: 91 9891300510, 911 22430214

    mosaic.net.in, [email protected]

  • 7/29/2019 Restoration versus New construction

    2/8

    Rajasthangovt.declared in2009 topromoteGreenBuildings.(EconomicTimes Oct19,2009)

    TherunoftheGreenBuildingsConceptshouldstartfromexistingstructuresas Thegreenest

    buildingsaretheoneswealreadyhave. (JaneJacobs,UrbanActivist,1993)

    Astudywasconductedtoanalyzetheeconomical,environmentalandsocialcostofdemolitionand

    reconstruction

    of

    the

    existing

    residential

    government

    quarters

    against

    restoration/retrofitting

    of

    thesame.

    Thepilotanalysishasbeen doneforonedistrict Sriganganagar.The resultsmaybeapplied forthe

    other32

    districts

    of

    Rajasthan.

    Datacollection Analysis Strategies

    From

    Sriganganagar

    SurveySamples

    Restoration

    vsNewconstruction

    Economicalcost

    Findings

    Action

    Wayforward312residentialunits

    Environmentalcost

    Socialcost2

    012

    mosaic.net.in

    +919891200510

    5/23

  • 7/29/2019 Restoration versus New construction

    3/8

    85% ofthebuildingsaremorethan40yrsoldandhencewouldrequireeitherrestorationornew

    construction,i.e.18,786sqmt oftotalBUAwithinnext5to20yrs.

    Ageof

    buildings

    YearTotalAllotment

    (Lakhs)

    TotalExpenditure

    (Lakhs)

    11% 4%

    24% 020

    2140. .

    200809 07.65 07.76

    200910 07.50 06.59

    201011 08.00 08.00

    19% 4160

    6180

    201112 07.53 10.01

    Total 40.78 43.14

    Avg /year 08.15 08.62 Source:PWD,Sriganganagar

    Lowerbudgetallocatedforrepairingandmaintenancedegradesthelifespanofabuilding.

    Costof

    New

    Construction Cost

    of

    Restoration

    3032lakhs 606lakhs

    Assumptions:Thecostisfor18,786sqmt of construction/restoration.

    The costofrestorationisexclusiveofanyadditionofnewspace.

    Source:Author

    2

    012

    mosaic.net.in

    +919891200510

    pen ngon y o econs ruc oncos w ncrease eageo e u ng ya ou years.5/23

  • 7/29/2019 Restoration versus New construction

    4/8

    Total PWD Residential Units in Sriganganagar District Headquarter 312 nos.

    85 % of the units are more than 40 rs old 265 nos.

    Total Cost of Construction 30.32 Crore

    Total Cost of Renovation/Restoration/Retrofitting 6.06 Crore

    Hence, amount saved per unit 9.15 Lakhs

    Estimated Govt. units in Sriganganagar District 1500 nos.

    .

    Approximate Total Savings in -

    Sriganganagar District 145.88 Crore

    4 814.04 Crore

    12 major states of India 57,768.48 Crore

    , ,

    savings

    are

    substantial

    over

    the

    next

    20

    years.

    2

    012

    mosaic.net.in

    +919891200510

    5/23

  • 7/29/2019 Restoration versus New construction

    5/8

    AccordingtoPreservationGreenLabstudy,whencomparingbuildingsofequivalentsizeandfunction,

    building

    reuse

    offers

    definite

    environmental

    savings

    over

    demolition

    and

    new

    construction.

    9 Demolishingtheexistingstructure 9 Transportingoutdebris 9Transportingmaterialstosite

    9 Trans ortin workforce 9 Layingofnewservices 9 Erectin Structures

    Approximately1200fullygrowntreeswouldberequiredtosequestratetheamountofCO2 generatedby

    transportationofdebris.Hence,considerthenumberoftrees,relatedlandandmanpowerthatwouldbe

    IMPACTOFCONSTRUCTIONINDUSTRY

    .

    Activitiesin

    restoration

    that

    minimizes

    Population Vegetation

    AirQualityClimate

    Transportinginmaterials.(25%lesser)

    Trans ortin workforce. 25%lesser

    ConstructionTransportationWatersheds

    1/6oftheworlds 1/4ofworlds 2/5ofworlds2

    012

    mosaic.net.in

    +919891200510

    5/23

  • 7/29/2019 Restoration versus New construction

    6/8

    Demolishingandrebuildingofthestructurehasin generalthreeimportantfactorsforsocialcost:

    Pollution addedto

    the

    atmosphere

    due

    to

    demolition

    and

    the

    resultant

    health

    cost.

    Relocation ofthehousehold.

    Lossofrestorationskillsetexistingamongcurrentworkers

    COMPARINGTHEADVANTAGESOFBOTHTHEMETHODS

    Advantagesof

    Restoration

    /Renovation Advantages

    of

    New

    construction

    Addingmorefloorscanbetrickybutinnovativeuseofthe Allthestructuresare loadbearing,whichmeansrestoration

    toilettotheexistingunit.

    . ,

    constructioncanbringupmoreBUAwithinagivenareaof

    land.

    Itrequires

    lesser

    money

    but

    need

    manpower

    with

    unique

    It

    is

    easier

    but

    require

    more

    money.

    tec nica s i s .

    Itoffersgreaterenvironmentalsavings

    Source:Author

    2

    012

    mosaic.net.in

    +919891200510

    5/23

  • 7/29/2019 Restoration versus New construction

    7/8

    Findings Strategies

    Reuse/restoration matters Institutionalsetup

    er agew ng

    Trainingcell

    Budgetaryallocationforinitialstartup

    Cost of Renovation for single unit 2.30 Lakhs

    Assuming 25% of the total buildings to be 80 yrs old that require immediate repair 66 nos.

    Sriganganagar District 1.51 Crore

    33 Districts of Rajasthan 49.83 Crore

    .

    Approximate cost for Institutional Set Up (Heritage Wing/Training Cell) 10.00 Crore

    Apartfromhigheconomicbenefit,themostimportantperspectiveofrestorationis

    environmental safe uard. Besides the reuse of the buildin materials natural resources will be

    2

    012

    savedbytheuseofrestorationofexistingbuildings.

    mosaic.net.in

    +919891200510

    5/23

  • 7/29/2019 Restoration versus New construction

    8/8

    2

    012

    mosaic.net.in

    +919891200510

    5/23