Upload
jesus-harrington
View
223
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
Systems Performance Department
August, 2000
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
• Identify and evaluate restraint system parameters with respect to occupant protection
– Driver, passenger, seat-mounted side, curtain air bags
– Seat belts
– Steering wheels
– Sensors
• Perform mathematical modeling (PAMSAFE & MADYMO)
• Perform dynamic sled tests to evaluate systems
• Provide design direction to application engineering team
Responsibilities - Frontal, Side, Rollover Impact
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
• Restraint Component Level
– Bag geometry design (shape, volume, coverage)
– Inflator selection (output, slope, multi-stage)
– Seat belt (webbing, load limiting, pretensioner)
– Steering wheel (strength)
– Sensors (fire time)
• Restraint System Level (simulation of crash tests)
– Frontal: FMVSS 208, NCAP, Offset frontal
– Side: FMVSS 214, ECE R95, LINCAP, Pole
– Rollover: FMVSS 208, Screw Ramp, Curb Trip
Systems Performance Process: Use of CAE
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
System and Testing Program Development ProcessAirbag
Bag shapeand volume
Product integrity testing(static and linearimpactor tests)
Model/correlate staticdeployment and impactor
performance
SYSTEM MODELWITH
VALIDATEDCOMPONENTS
Inflator Belts Wheel Other
MODEL MODEL TEST TEST MODEL TEST
Package andvolume check
Initial tank testsand mass flowcalculations
Tank model
Pendulum orlinear impactor
model
Inflator : Mass flow, T, Gas propertiesBag : Material properties, Fold
Knee Bolster : Force/deflectionSteering column: Force/deflectionSeat : Force/deflection
Webbing, retractor andpretensioner tests
Webbing : StiffnessRetractor: Function characteristicsPretensioner : Function characteristics
Model skeletonand stress tests
Quasi-static(Instron) tests
Wheel : Stiffness function
Quasi-static(Instron) tests
TESTTEST
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
Restraint System Optimization (50th, Mid, NCAP)
INJURY CRITERIA RESULTS
HIC 347
Chest G’s 44.3 g’s
Chest Comp. 38.9 mm
Left Femur 3624 N
Right Femur 3890 N
Rating 5* (9.71%)
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
Systems Approach to Restraint Design
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
Simulation Verification for Different Crash Speeds
Various Crash Pulses for SUV
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
Time (s)
Ac
ce
lera
tio
n (
g's
)
30mph Barrier
30mph Pole
15mph Barrier
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
System Correlation
-1000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0 50 100 150
Time (msec)
Forc
e (
N)
SimulationBelt Load
Sled BeltLoad
Belt Load
Pelvis Resultant Acceleration
0
200
400
600
800
0 50 100 150
Time (msec)
Acc
ele
rati
on
(m
/s**
2)
SimulationPelvis AccelResultant
Sled PelvisAccelResultant
Head Accel Resultant
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 50 100 150
Time (msec)
Acc
ele
rati
on
(m
/s**
2)
Simulation HeadAccel Resultant
Sled Head AccelResultant
Chest Accel Resultant
0100200300400500600
0 50 100 150
Time (msec)
Acc
ele
rati
on
(m
/s**
2)
SimulationChest AccelResultant
Sled ChestAccelResultant
Sled Results: HIC=1166 Chest Clip=54.0gModel Results: HIC=1156 Chest Clip=48.4g
• Correlate NCAP Model to NCAP Sled Test with Full Power Inflator
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
• Coupled 5th Female Driver OOPO ModelDriver Inflator OOP Modeling
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
Rollover: Occupant Kinematic Assessment
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
Rollover Curtain Bag
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
• Kinematic Sequence: Chin on Top of ModuleDriver Inflator OOP Modeling
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
• Comparison Test vs. SimulationDriver Inflator OOP Modeling
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
Out of Position Child Simulation
Return to Agenda
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
Out of Position Child Simulation & Test
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
MADYMO: Knee Air Bag with an Aluminum Load Distributor
MADYMO: Same Knee Air Bag without a Load Distributor
Inflatable Knee Bolster Modeling
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
Knee Force DeflectionMADYMO - 30mph Unbelted
Knee Bolster Vs. Knee Air Bag
-9000-8000-7000-6000-5000-4000-3000-2000-1000
010002000
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25
Deflection (m)
Forc
e (N
)
Left-Bolster Right-Bolster Left-Knee Airbag Right-Knee Airbag
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
Pelvic AccelerationMADYMO - 30mph Unbelted
Knee Bolster Vs. Knee Airbag
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Time (ms)
Ac
ce
lera
tio
n
(m/s
^2
)
Knee Bolster
Knee Airbag
Pelvic AccelerationMADYMO - 30mph Unbelted
Knee Bolster Vs. Knee Airbag
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Time (ms)
Ac
ce
lera
tio
n
(m/s
^2
)
Knee Bolster
Knee Airbag
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
Chest AccelerationMADYMO - 30mph Unbelted
Knee Bolster Vs. Knee Airbag
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Time (ms)
Ac
ce
lera
tio
n
(m/s
^2
)
Knee Bolster
Knee Airbag
Chest AccelerationMADYMO - 30mph Unbelted
Knee Bolster Vs. Knee Airbag
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Time (ms)
Ac
ce
lera
tio
n
(m/s
^2
)
Knee Bolster
Knee Airbag
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
Femur LoadsMADYMO - 30mph Unbelted
Knee Bolster Vs. Knee Airbag
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Time (ms)
Fo
rce (
N)
Knee Bolste - Left Femurr Knee Bolster - Right Femur Knee Airbag - Left Femur Knee Airbag - Right Femur
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities
Inflatable Knee Bolster Test Comparison
Return to Agenda