Result Analysis-Engr 101

8/11/2019 Result Analysis-Engr 101

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/result-analysis-engr-101 1/9

RESULT ANALYSIS

COURSE TITLE: CREATIVITY IN ENGINEERING DESIGN – I

CODE: ENGR 101

INSTRUCTOR: MOHAMED ALI S

SECTION: 2457

CREDIT HOURS: 2

TOTAL No. OF LECTURE HOURS: 27

SPRING SEMESTER: 2013-2014

Submitted to: The Dean, Faculty of Engineering

ISLAMIC UNIVERISITY

Al Madinah Al Munawwarh, KSA

Report Prepared by: MOHAMED ALI S

[email protected]

http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/[email protected]





CONTENTS

Sl.No. TITLES PAGE

No.

1 ASSESMENT METHODOLOGY

2 NAME LIST AND FINAL GRADE

3 TABLE- RANKING OF STUDENTS

4 CHART -COMMUNICATION ABILITY

5 RANGE OF MARKS - HISTOGRAM

6 CURVED GRADES

7 GRADE COUNT

8 COMMENTS AND SUGGESTION

ASSESMENT METHODOLOGY

Assessment

MethodQuantity

Percentage

Contribution

to the total

Grade

OutcomeExam

Pattern

ASSIGNMENT 6+1 22+10 = 32 TEAM WORK,

Open Book

and

Reference

Materials

QUIZ 6 18

CONCEPT

UNDERSTANDING

ABILITY

Closed

Book class

room exam

EXAM 3 15+15+20= 50

CONCEPT

UNDERSTANDING

AND

COMMUNICATION

ABILITY

Closed book

Public Exam

100

(Maximum)



NAME LIST AND FINAL GRADE

Sl_No UNIV_ID NAME % OF ATTD GRADE ALG1

1 331001383 ا ه ا ه 88.89 50 F

2 331001083ادادي

ف

ه

ذ

ه

خذ

88.89

71 C

3 331008273 خذ ه ذاه ه ذاسس اح 88.89 74 C

4 331004763م ذ ه و ه ز

92.59

76 C+

5 331062843ا

اة

زذ

85.19 55 F

6 331001973 ا ع ه قز ه 88.89 51 F

7 331001223ص ه ذ ه ح اى

85.19

56 F

8 331001853 اذ اسس ه ذ ه اد 88.89 71 C

11 331029873 اذ ه ا ه ذ 70.37 67 D+

13 331001233ذ ه ه اىي

92.59

63 D

14 331001163ذ ه ف ه ذ اىذ

81.48

50 F

15 331001493 ا

ل

ه

ذ

ه

92.59

44 F

16 331001703جذ ه تك ه ادي

85.19

54 F

17 331001673 ا طوز ه يخ ه ب 92.59 64 D

18 331001183 ذ ه اا ه ذ اذاف 92.59 64 D

19 331015253ا ض ه قز ه نم

85.19

43 F

20 331001593 اغىذ ه ط ه راجح 77.78 63 D

21 331001533 ا يخ ه ذ ه ف 85.19 60 D

22 331066813و ن اذ ذاك

88.89

63 D

19 60 D1 - Absolute Letter Grade

TABEL - RANKING OF STUDENTS

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

27 29 30 29 29 29 27 30 29 29 2518

24 26 2923

30 29 30

10 10 12 11 6 5 1111 8 9

9

107

911

7

10 9 8

13

3132 36

20 1717

30

30 24

1515

22

28 24

13

23 21 25

GRADE-COMPONENTS

ASSGN+QUIZ+EXAM

ASSN QUIZ EXAM



Sl_No UNIV_ID NAME GRADE Rank

4 331004763و ه زم ذ ه

76 1

2 331001083خذ ه ذ ه ف ادادي

71

2

11 331029873اذ ه ا ه ذ

67

3

8 331001853ا

اد

ه

ذ

ه

اسس

ذ

71 4

3 331008273خذ ه ذاه ه ذاسس اح

74 5

17 331001673ه خي ه زوط اب

64

6

22 331066813و ن اذ ذاك

63 7

20 331001593غا حجار ه ط ه ذى

63 8

13 331001233ذ ه ه اىي

63 9

16 331001703جذ ه تك ه ادي

54

10

18 331001183اا ه ذ اذاذ ه

64 11

6 331001973ا ع ه قز ه

51 12

21 331001533ا يخ ه ذ ه ف

60

13

7 331001223اى

ح

ه

ذ

ه

ص

56

145 331062843

ا ةا ذز

55 15

15 331001493ل ا ه ذ ه

44 16

14 331001163ذ ه ف ه ذ اىذ

50

17

1 331001383ا ه ا ه

50 18

19 331015253ا ض ه قز ه نم

43 19

Ranking is based on the communication ability as the employability of the student is mostly

decided by this criteria.

It is calculated by his achievement in the descriptive question he has answered in the three

exams, namely midterm 1 (MT1), midterm 2 (MT2) and final exam (FE). It consists of 50%

multiple choice questions and 50% descriptive type questions.

The total score is converted to percentage and the achievement of each student is shown in

the following charts.



CHART - COMMUNICATION ABILITY

Though the achievement in the exams MT1, MT2 and FE is almost same from the above

chart the ability in achieving through descriptive answers is very poor for some students

It was shown in the Ranking of the students and those were the students at the bottom end

of that table.

Sl_No UNIV_ID NAME GRADE Rank

7 331001223ص ه ذ ه ح اى

56 14

5 331062843ا ةا ذز

55

15

15 331001493ا ل ه ذ ه

44 16

14 331001163ذ ه ف ه ذ اىذ

50

17

1 331001383ا ه ا ه

50

18

19 331015253ا ض ه قز ه نم

43 19

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 1 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2

2027

34 3125

17 2027 26 25 23 21 23 26 27

22 2024 21

6

35

2940

13

18 14

3333

22

7 9

20

2920

3

24 1729

MT1,MT2 & FE

MULTIPLE CHOICE DESCRIPTIVE ANSWERS



RANGE OF MARKS

40-45

Sl_No UNIV_ID NAME GRADE ALG

15 331001493ا ل ه ذ ه

44 F

19 331015253ا ض ه قز ه نم

43 F

2 43.5

ALG – Absolute Letter Grade

46-50


1 331001383ا ه ا ه

50 F

14 331001163ذ ه ف ه ذ اىذ

50

F

2 50

51-55


5 331062843ا ةا ذز

55 F

6 331001973ا ع ه قز ه

51 F

16 331001703جذ ه تك ه ادي

54

F

3 53.33333

56-60


7 331001223ص ه ذ ه ح اى

56 F

21 331001533ا يخ ه ذ ه ف

60 D

2 58

61-65


13 331001233ذ ه ه اىي

63

D

17 331001673ا طوز ه يخ ه ب

64

D

18 331001183ذ ه اا ه ذ اذاف

64 D

20 331001593غا حجار ه ط ه ذى

63

D

22 331066813و ن اذ ذاك

63

D

5 63.4



66-70


11 331029873اذ ه ا ه ذ

67 D+

1 67

71-75


2 331001083خذ ه ذ ه ف ادادي

71 C

3 331008273خذ ه ذاه ه ذاسس

اح

74

C

8 331001853ا دا ه ذ ه سسا ذ

71 C

3 72

76-80


4 331004763م ذ ه و ه ز

76 C+

1 76

To make the average as 70 the existing marks has to be increased by 10

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

50 53 58 63 67 72 76

N o . O F

S T U D E N T S

GRADE

HISTOGRAM AV ERAGE:60

No. of Students



CURVED GRADES

GRADE COUNTS

COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS

-THANKS

Thank you very much for giving me an opportunity to learn and teach a new subject

in a new environment and in a new land.

- SYLLABUS

The syllabus of this course is designed and followed for the US system of education,

though we also followed the same, the important criteria to understand this voluminous

subject is understanding the lecture and expressing their views in English. It is observed in

the class room and during the project work phase that, though many students have their

innovative concepts they could not deliver or express their views in English. This comment is

substantiated by giving you a big picture of their ability to answer descriptive questions in

the examinations. We can see a large gap in the achieving marks in two patterns. (ReferPage No. ?)

- NEEDS MODIFICATION

Though the course has a name creativity, the students have their firsthand

experience only through their project work. It is carried out only after the first midterm and

also it was not conducted as per the commitment we made, that each group would be

supervised by a faculty with respective to their project.

We need to stimulate student’s creativity thorough puzzles , which does not requireproficiency in English language but develop their creative skills. The problems proposed in

the following books are really interesting and creative and it may be consider for the future

revisions of this course.

1) Creative Techniques in Product and Engineering Design - A Practical

Workbook, D J Walker Lecturer, Design Discipline, Faculty of Technology, The Open

University, B K J Dagger, Industrial Consultant, Design and Manufacture, ( Formerly,

Project Manager - Training Development, EITB )

R Roy, Senior Lecturer, Design Discipline, Faculty of Technology, The Open

University, WOODHEAD PUBLISHING LIMITED



2) Make and Test Projects in Engineering Design- Creativity, Engagement and

Learning, Andrew Samuel, Springer-Verlag London Limited 2006

3) PUZZLES IN THOUGHT AND LOGIC, c. R. WYLIE Jr. Department 0f

Mathematics, University 0f Utah, Dover Publications Inc., New York

4) Puzzles 101, A puzzlemaster’s Challenge, Nobuyuki Yoshigahara, A K Peters,Natick, Massachusetts.

SUGGESTIONS

The course may be changed to three credit hours per week by considering the

language proficiency of the students and may be taught in relatively in a slower rate to

accommodate the mathematical and puzzle type problems.

The coordinator has put tremendous effort without considering whether it reaches

the student or not. It was totally in his control and I feel that other faculties potential were

not exploited and we were not given enough space. Especially preparing questions and

conducting examinations. I yet to understand whether he is underestimating our potential

or not relying on us. Though we went through many discussions during these four months

of course duration we or at-least I was kept at dark regarding the question pattern and

evaluation pattern till the day of exam. It puts me in a embarrassing situations in front of

students. The coordinator was so grateful to the author of the text book which we referred

for this course by insisting us to follow the same slides supplied by the author. The faculty

should be given full freedom in this activities.

The soft copies of these course materials and slides are available at

https://sites.google.com/site/aliatium/home

All these comments and suggestion are to improve the standard of this course in the

context of KSA education system and to maintain the integrity of the faculties who will be

teaching the course in future according to my observation.




Documents

Result Analysis-Engr 101