Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ReWild Mission
BayPUBLIC WORKSHOP #2
Wh
at
is R
eW
ild
Mis
sio
n B
ay?
With
ReW
ild M
issi
on B
ay, S
an D
iego
A
udub
on is
faci
litat
ing
a th
ree-
year
pl
anni
ng p
roce
ss th
at in
clud
es c
olle
ctin
g co
mm
unity
inpu
t and
exp
lori
ng o
ptio
ns to
re
stor
e w
etla
nds
alon
g Pa
cific
Bea
ch D
rive
on
bot
h si
des
of R
ose
Cree
k.
By
May
201
7, th
is p
roce
ss w
ill y
ield
at
leas
t thr
ee v
ersi
ons
of a
com
mun
ity-
info
rmed
, sci
entifi
cally
def
ensi
ble
wet
land
s re
stor
atio
n pl
an fo
r th
e no
rthe
ast
corn
er o
f Mis
sion
Bay
.
Nex
t ste
ps w
ill in
clud
e pr
elim
inar
y de
sign
, en
viro
nmen
tal r
evie
w, fi
nal e
ngin
eeri
ng,
perm
ittin
g, a
nd, u
ltim
atel
y, r
esto
ratio
n of
th
e ar
ea’s
wet
land
s.
WE
LC
OM
E
STU
DY
AR
EA(4
61 a
cres
)
Mis
sion
Bay
Rose Creek
Mis
sion
Bay
Gol
f Cou
rse
This
pro
ject
of S
an D
iego
Aud
ubon
is fu
nded
by
CA
Sta
te C
oast
al C
onse
rvan
cy a
nd U
.S.
Fish
and
Wild
life
Ser
vice
.
Pacific Ocean
Mis
sion
B
ay
ST
UD
Y A
RE
A
Incl
udes
the
46-
acre
Cam
plan
d le
ase
area
.
Incl
udes
the
Ken
dall-
Fros
t Mar
sh
Res
erve
ow
ned
by th
e U
nive
rsity
of
Cal
ifor
nia
as w
ell a
s th
ree
City
-ow
ned
prop
ertie
s: F
rost
Par
cel,
Nor
ther
n W
ildlif
e P
rese
rve,
and
S
trib
ley
Mar
sh.
Per
the
Mis
sion
B
ay M
aste
r P
lan,
th
e D
e A
nza
Spe
cial
Stu
dy
Are
a is
76
acre
s.
De
An
za
RFA
(76
acre
s)
Ca
mp
lan
d R
FA
(52
acre
s)
KF
MR
/NW
P
RFA
(66
acre
s)
HIS
TO
RIC
AL
CO
ND
ITIO
NS
Pro
ject
Vic
init
y: 1
857
Pla
nnin
g A
rea
Hab
itat
s: m
id t
o la
te 1
800s
PR
OJ
EC
T V
ICIN
ITY
FR
OM
18
00
s T
O P
RE
SE
NT
DA
Y
Sou
rces
: Cal
shee
ts.o
rg, S
FEI,
SC
CW
RP,
CS
UN
Pro
ject
Vi
cini
ty
3
3
11
32
4
Exte
nsiv
e sa
lt m
arsh
in
Pla
nnin
g A
rea
18
57
›B
oth
Mis
sion
Bay
and
Ros
e C
reek
look
ed v
ery
diff
eren
t th
an th
ey d
o to
day.
›D
evel
opm
ent i
n th
e ar
ea w
as
min
imal
.
19
28
›D
evel
opm
ent,
such
as
hous
ing
and
road
s, w
as b
egin
ning
to
occu
r.
›R
ose
Cre
ek w
as c
hann
eliz
ed
into
a s
trai
ght p
ath,
and
its
mou
th m
oved
to it
s pr
esen
t lo
catio
n.
›S
ubst
antia
l sub
tidal
and
ope
n w
ater
hab
itats
wer
e pr
esen
t w
ithin
the
bay.
20
16
›Ex
tens
ive
deve
lopm
ent i
n th
e 19
00s
chan
ged
the
shap
e of
M
issi
on B
ay a
nd it
s su
rrou
ndin
gs.
›M
issi
on B
ay P
ark
was
cre
ated
th
roug
h th
e dr
edgi
ng o
f wet
land
s an
d cr
eatio
n of
isla
nds.
›D
evel
opm
ent,
incl
udin
g ur
bani
zatio
n in
mar
shes
aro
und
the
bay,
red
uced
sub
tidal
and
op
en w
ater
hab
itat.
Sou
rces
: Goo
gle
Eart
h
Sou
rces
: Cou
nty
of S
an D
iego
(ind
ivid
ual i
mag
es),
SFE
I 201
6 (m
osai
c)
Sou
rces
: NO
AA
PR
ED
EV
EL
OP
ME
NT
EC
OL
OG
Y –
his
tori
ca
l c
on
dit
ion
s h
elp
gu
ide
re
sto
rati
on
.
1 S
an D
iego
Riv
er h
ad m
ultip
le c
ours
es
2 R
ose
Cre
ek fo
llow
ed m
ore
sinu
ous
path
to
M
issi
on (F
alse
) Bay
3 M
osai
c of
sub
tidal
, mud
flat
, sal
t mar
sh,
tr
ansi
tion,
and
rip
aria
n ha
bita
ts
4 S
ubst
antia
l ope
n w
ater
, sub
tidal
hab
itat
Sou
rce:
NO
AA’
s O
ffice
of C
oast
Sur
vey
His
tori
cal M
ap &
Cha
rt C
olle
ctio
n
LEG
END Pla
nnin
g A
rea
Vege
tatio
n C
omm
unity
and
Cov
er T
ypes
(AEC
OM
201
6)
Mar
sh a
nd W
etla
nds
Mud
flat
Sal
t Pan
ne
Sal
t Mar
sh
Tida
l Cha
nnel
s
Ope
n W
ater
Upl
ands D
istu
rbed
Hab
itat
Coa
stal
Sag
e S
crub
San
d D
unes
Oth
er L
and
Cov
er T
ypes
Dev
elop
ed
EX
IST
ING
CO
ND
ITIO
NS
BIO
LO
GY
/E
CO
LO
GY
•D
ata
from
Zem
bale
t al.
2015
•Li
ght-f
oote
d R
idgw
ay’s
rail
is fe
dera
lly-
liste
d as
an
enda
nger
ed s
peci
es a
nd
Bel
ding
’s s
avan
nah
spar
row
is s
tate
-list
ed.
HY
DR
OL
OG
Y
INF
RA
ST
RU
CT
UR
E
PU
BL
IC A
CC
ES
S/L
AN
D U
SE
S
Sou
rce:
San
GIS
Sal
t mar
sh h
abita
t (K
enda
ll Fr
ost)
is
impo
rtan
t for
ligh
t-fo
oted
Rid
gway
’s r
ail
and
Bel
ding
’s s
avan
nah
spar
row
.
Sub
tidal
hab
itats
ar
e im
port
ant f
or
fish
, inv
erte
brat
es,
and
bird
s, in
clud
ing
enda
nger
ed C
alif
orni
a le
ast t
ern.
Ros
e C
reek
is im
port
ant
as a
wild
life
corr
idor
in
an u
rban
env
iron
men
t.
Wet
land
s ne
ed a
var
iety
of
hab
itats
(inc
ludi
ng
upla
nd a
nd tr
ansi
tiona
l) su
rrou
ndin
g th
em
in o
rder
to fu
nctio
n pr
oper
ly. U
plan
d an
d tr
ansi
tiona
l hab
itats
pr
ovid
e fo
od fo
r w
ildlif
e an
d se
rve
as a
ref
uge
from
eve
nts
like
extr
eme
tides
.
Sou
rce:
San
GIS
Teco
lote
C
reek
Ros
e C
reek
Stor
m D
rain
D
isch
arge
Tide
s
HY
DR
OL
OG
Y ›
Ava
ilabi
lity
of C
ampl
and
and
De
Anz
a S
peci
al S
tudy
Are
a pr
ovid
e op
port
unity
to r
econ
nect
his
tori
cal m
arsh
pla
ins
to m
outh
of R
ose
Cre
ek.
›Ex
istin
g gr
ound
ele
vatio
ns li
mit
the
abili
ty to
pro
vide
tida
l exc
hang
e to
maj
ority
of C
ampl
and
and
De
Anz
a S
peci
al S
tudy
Are
a.
›Fl
ood
risk
mus
t be
mai
ntai
ned
at c
urre
nt le
vels
und
er e
xist
ing
sea
leve
l con
ditio
ns.
›R
epla
cing
dev
elop
men
t with
hab
itat m
eans
that
dev
elop
men
t w
ould
not
be
at r
isk
of fl
oodi
ng u
nder
exi
stin
g or
futu
re s
ea le
vel
cond
ition
s.
›Ti
dal i
nflue
nce
with
in th
e pl
anni
ng
area
allo
ws
for
rest
orat
ion
of ti
dally
in
flue
nced
coa
stal
sal
t mar
sh.
›D
redg
ing
plan
ned
by th
e C
ity o
f San
D
iego
at t
he m
outh
of R
ose
Cre
ek
redu
ces
floo
d an
d na
viga
tion
risk
s an
d im
prov
es w
ater
qua
lity,
thou
gh
with
som
e im
pact
to w
ildlif
e ha
bita
t.
KE
Y C
ON
SID
ER
AT
ION
SO
WN
ER
SH
IP &
LA
ND
US
E ›
Exis
ting
leas
e fo
r D
e A
nza
Spe
cial
Stu
dy A
rea
has
expi
red
and
exis
ting
leas
e fo
r Ca
mpl
and
will
exp
ire
soon
.
›R
esto
ratio
n m
ust
occu
r w
ithin
app
licab
le
regu
latio
ns, s
uch
as C
lean
W
ater
Act
, End
ange
red
Spe
cies
Act
, and
Coa
stal
Act
›Th
e M
issi
on B
ay P
ark
Mas
ter
Pla
n ca
lls fo
r an
d pr
ovid
es o
ppor
tuni
ties
for
habi
tat r
esto
ratio
n ac
ross
stu
dy a
rea:
›D
e A
nza
SS
A: “
…..a
dditi
onal
wet
land
s cr
eatio
n m
ust b
e co
nsid
ered
as
part
of
the
SS
A…
.” (P
age
53, M
BP
MP
)
›C
ampl
and:
“an
80-
acre
sal
twat
er
mar
sh is
pro
pose
d w
est o
f Ros
e C
reek
…
.Thi
s re
com
men
datio
n re
quir
es th
e re
loca
tion
of th
e R
ecre
atio
nal V
ehic
le
Par
k (C
ampl
and
of th
e B
ay)”
(pa
ge 1
0,
MB
PM
P)
TO
PO
GR
AP
HY
›C
urre
nt C
alif
orni
a C
oast
al C
omm
issi
on s
ea le
vel r
ise
guid
ance
as
sum
es u
p to
2 fe
et o
f sea
leve
l ris
e by
205
0 an
d up
to 5
.5 fe
et b
y 21
00.
›Ex
istin
g el
evat
ions
do
not s
uppo
rt s
alt m
arsh
, but
exc
avat
ion
coul
d al
low
cre
atio
n of
sal
t mar
sh h
abita
t und
er c
urre
nt s
ea le
vel
cond
ition
s.
›S
ome
exis
ting
elev
atio
ns
coul
d su
ppor
t sa
lt m
arsh
un
der
proj
ecte
d se
a le
vel
rise
co
nditi
ons.
G
radi
ng
coul
d be
de
sign
ed
to a
llow
for
addi
tiona
l ha
bita
ts th
at w
ould
shi
ft to
wet
land
s as
sea
leve
l ris
es (k
now
n as
w
etla
nd m
igra
tion)
.
BIO
LO
GY
/E
CO
LO
GY
›C
reat
ing
mor
e sa
lt m
arsh
adj
acen
t to
the
exis
ting
Ken
dall
Fros
t R
eser
ve w
ould
cre
ate
a la
rger
con
tinuo
us b
lock
of h
abita
t, in
crea
sing
eco
logi
cal f
unct
ion.
Con
nect
ed h
abita
ts a
llow
wild
life
to
mov
e fr
om p
lace
to p
lace
to lo
ok fo
r fo
od a
nd s
helt
er.
›La
ndfo
rms
and
topo
grap
hy c
onst
rain
the
abili
ty to
ach
ieve
full
conn
ectiv
ity b
etw
een
habi
tats
.
›G
reat
er h
abita
t div
ersi
ty p
rovi
des
hom
es fo
r m
ore
spec
ies.
Lar
ge
plan
ning
are
a m
eans
res
tora
tion
can
inco
rpor
ate
a nu
mbe
r of
ha
bita
ts, s
uch
as tr
ansi
tiona
l and
upl
and
habi
tats
, tha
t can
sup
port
ra
re s
peci
es a
nd p
rovi
de a
dapt
atio
n to
sea
leve
l ris
e in
the
futu
re.
›R
esto
ratio
n is
an
oppo
rtun
ity to
exp
and
popu
latio
ns o
f end
ange
red
spec
ies
and
reco
ver
dim
inis
hed
plan
t div
ersi
ty.
›Ex
istin
g ha
bita
ts a
nd s
peci
es w
ill n
eed
to b
e pr
otec
ted
duri
ng a
nd
afte
r re
stor
atio
n.
›C
oast
al w
etla
nds
prov
ide
nurs
ery
habi
tat f
or m
any
fish
spe
cies
, in
clud
ing
the
com
mer
cial
ly im
port
ant C
alif
orni
a ha
libut
.
PU
BL
IC A
CC
ES
S/U
SE
S ›
Cur
rent
pub
lic a
cces
s en
trie
s to
the
site
are
lim
ited.
›C
urre
nt w
etla
nd s
yste
m is
isol
ated
, but
edg
es a
re e
xpos
ed to
ad
jace
nt u
rban
impa
cts.
›H
abita
t res
tora
tion
wou
ld in
clud
e co
nsid
erat
ion
for
publ
ic a
cces
s to
th
e pr
ojec
t are
a (e
.g. t
rails
).
›R
esto
ratio
n w
ould
incl
ude
cons
ider
atio
n to
enh
ance
opp
ortu
nitie
s fo
r lo
cal e
duca
tion
on w
ildlif
e ha
bita
t (e.
g. n
atur
e ce
nter
).
INF
RA
ST
RU
CT
UR
E ›
Som
e ex
istin
g in
fras
truc
ture
wou
ld b
e re
mov
ed to
impr
ove
habi
tat,
open
spa
ce, v
isito
r am
eniti
es, a
esth
etic
s, w
ater
qua
lity
and
wat
er
flow
.
›S
ome
exis
ting
infr
astr
uctu
re, s
uch
as
trai
ls o
r bu
ildin
g pa
ds,
coul
d be
reu
sed
or
repu
rpos
ed.
›In
fras
truc
ture
out
side
pr
ojec
t bou
ndar
y m
ust b
e pr
otec
ted
and
mai
ntai
ned
(e.g
., ut
ilitie
s,
floo
d pr
otec
tion)
.O
utda
ted
infr
astr
uctu
re w
ithin
stu
dy a
rea
Teco
lote
C
reek
Ros
e C
reek
Stor
m D
rain
D
isch
arge
Tide
sN
AVD
: Nor
th A
mer
ican
Ver
tical
Dat
um o
f 198
8.
A 1
945
trus
t agr
eem
ent b
etw
een
the
Cal
ifor
nia
Sta
te
Land
s C
omm
issi
on a
nd th
e C
ity o
f San
Die
go g
rant
ed s
tate
tid
elan
ds w
ithin
Mis
sion
Bay
Par
k to
be
held
in tr
ust a
nd
man
aged
by
the
City
.
EXIS
TIN
G T
OP
OG
RA
PH
Y
TIM
EL
INE
20
24
-20
34
Res
tora
tion
Mon
itori
ng
20
21
-20
24
Con
stru
ctio
n
20
20
-20
21
Fina
l Eng
inee
ring
D
esig
n
20
18
-20
20
Res
tora
tion
Des
ign
and
C
EQA
/NEP
A
20
18
App
rova
ls*
20
15
-20
17
Wet
land
Res
tora
tion
Con
cept
ual P
lan
Win
ter/
Sp
rin
g
20
15
/20
16
Key
Pro
ject
C
onsi
dera
tions
Pub
lic W
orks
hop
#1
Su
mm
er
20
16
Res
tora
tion
Goa
ls
and
Obj
ectiv
es
Pub
lic W
orks
hop
#2
Fa
ll 2
01
6
Dra
ft R
esto
ratio
n A
lter
nativ
es
Pub
lic W
orks
hop
#3
Win
ter
20
17
Fina
l Res
tora
tion
Alt
erna
tives
Pub
lic W
orks
hop
#4
THIS
PR
OJE
CTA
NTI
CIP
ATED
TIM
ING
OF
FUTU
RE
EFFO
RTS
* A
ppro
vals
cou
ld in
clud
e S
an D
iego
City
Cou
ncil
App
rova
l & C
oast
al C
omm
issi
on A
ppro
val o
f the
Mis
sion
Bay
Par
k M
aste
r P
lan
Upd
ate.
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F P
UB
LIC
WO
RK
SH
OP
#1
›P
ublic
Wor
ksho
p #1
was
hel
d on
Mar
ch 1
6, 2
016
and
appr
oxim
atel
y 70
peo
ple
atte
nded
the
mee
ting.
›Fi
rst o
f fou
r pl
anne
d w
orks
hops
for
the
ReW
ild M
issi
on B
ay R
esto
ratio
n P
lan.
›Th
e pu
rpos
e w
as to
pro
vide
info
rmat
ion
abou
t the
pro
ject
and
sol
icit
inpu
t on
key
proj
ect c
onsi
dera
tions
.
›A
sum
mar
y of
maj
or d
iscu
ssio
n th
emes
rai
sed
at P
ublic
Wor
ksho
p #1
is s
how
n be
low
.
›A
full
sum
mar
y re
port
can
be
dow
nloa
ded
by v
isiti
ng h
ttps
://r
ewild
mis
sion
bay.
org.
TH
EM
E 1
: E
NV
ISIO
NIN
G R
EW
ILD
›Th
ere
was
ove
rwhe
lmin
g su
ppor
t for
mor
e na
tura
l are
as w
ithin
the
Pla
nnin
g A
rea
and
som
e w
ould
like
to s
ee a
bea
utif
ul, n
atur
al, i
coni
c se
ttin
g w
ithin
the
Pla
nnin
g A
rea
that
pro
vide
s a
sens
e of
pla
ce a
t the
mar
sh.
›Th
e P
lann
ing
Are
a w
as id
entifi
ed a
s a
back
yard
res
ourc
e an
d it
was
not
ed th
at
incr
ease
d tr
ails
and
con
nect
ions
to a
djac
ent n
eigh
borh
oods
wou
ld p
rovi
de m
ore
com
mun
ity a
cces
s to
nat
ural
are
as a
nd o
pen
spac
e in
this
por
tion
of M
issi
on B
ay.
›S
ome
men
tione
d a
desi
re to
see
edu
catio
nal c
ompo
nent
s fe
atur
ed in
the
over
all
desi
gn fo
r th
e P
lann
ing
Are
a, s
uch
as s
igna
ge, e
duca
tiona
l kio
sks,
nat
ure
cent
er, e
tc.
TH
EM
E 4
: R
ES
TO
RA
TIO
N D
ET
AIL
S
›M
any
part
icip
ants
not
ed th
at w
ater
qua
lity
in th
e ba
y co
uld
be im
prov
ed b
y fi
lter
ing
wat
er th
roug
h th
e go
lf c
ours
e an
d/or
veg
etat
ion
esta
blis
hed
thro
ugh
the
rest
orat
ion
proc
ess.
›M
any
atte
ndee
s st
ated
that
they
wou
ld li
ke to
max
imiz
e th
e ar
ea r
esto
red
to
wet
land
s, a
nd th
at h
abita
t res
tora
tion
shou
ld b
e pr
iori
tized
ove
r ac
tive,
dev
elop
ed
recr
eatio
n ar
eas.
›S
ome
part
icip
ants
sta
ted
that
res
ilien
ce to
sea
leve
l ris
e m
ust b
e in
corp
orat
ed in
to
rest
orat
ion
desi
gn in
ord
er to
pro
tect
adj
acen
t pro
pert
ies,
suc
h as
Mis
sion
Bay
Hig
h S
choo
l, an
d m
aint
ain
recr
eatio
nal a
cces
s in
the
futu
re.
›M
any
part
icip
ants
sug
gest
ed p
rior
itizi
ng im
prov
emen
ts in
hyd
rolo
gy, i
nclu
ding
tida
l in
flue
nce
and
cros
s-cu
rren
t exc
hang
e.
›S
ome
part
icip
ants
sug
gest
ed r
educ
ing
and/
or e
limin
atin
g ha
rdsc
ape
with
in th
e pl
anni
ng a
rea
and
impl
emen
ting
bios
wal
es/g
reen
str
eets
in th
e up
land
are
as.
›A
few
att
ende
es a
dvoc
ated
for
the
idea
of r
edir
ectin
g R
ose
Cre
ek a
s ne
eded
to
conn
ect w
etla
nds.
›A
sug
gest
ion
was
mad
e to
em
phas
ize
open
wat
er in
the
rest
orat
ion
desi
gn fo
r vi
sual
rea
sons
.
›S
ome
atte
ndee
s fe
lt th
at r
esto
ratio
n sh
ould
focu
s on
nat
ive
and
spec
ial-
stat
us
spec
ies.
›S
ome
com
men
ters
not
ed th
at b
reak
ing
up e
xist
ing
land
form
s, p
resu
mab
ly to
form
ch
anne
ls, i
n th
e pl
anni
ng a
rea
coul
d in
crea
se ti
dal i
nflue
nce.
›M
any
part
icip
ants
sug
gest
ed fo
cusi
ng o
n re
stor
ing
upst
ream
hab
itats
, rem
ovin
g no
n-na
tive
spec
ies
and
redu
cing
tran
sien
t occ
upat
ion
of R
ose
Cre
ek c
orri
dor.
›S
ome
atte
ndee
s lik
ed th
e id
ea o
f wor
king
with
the
Nat
ive
Am
eric
an c
omm
unity
to
crea
te a
cul
tura
l edu
catio
n ce
nter
.
›It
was
als
o no
ted
that
wet
land
s pr
ovid
e ca
rbon
seq
uest
ratio
n an
d it
was
als
o su
gges
ted
that
the
team
take
the
City
of S
an D
iego
Clim
ate
Act
ion
Pla
n in
to
cons
ider
atio
n.
›S
ome
wou
ld li
ke to
see
res
tore
d ha
bita
t in
plac
e of
bal
l fiel
ds o
r te
nnis
cou
rts,
or
in
plac
e of
a p
ortio
n of
thes
e fa
cilit
ies.
TH
EM
E 2
: A
CC
ES
S A
ND
RE
CR
EA
TIO
N
›M
any
part
icip
ants
sug
gest
ed c
reat
ing
path
s, tr
ails
or
boar
dwal
ks fo
r w
alki
ng,
cycl
ing
and
obse
rvat
ion.
Som
e of
thes
e su
gges
tions
incl
uded
req
uest
s fo
r m
ileag
e m
arke
rs o
r ex
erci
se c
ours
es.
›M
any
atte
ndee
s m
entio
ned
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f kay
akin
g op
port
uniti
es in
/aro
und
rest
ored
wet
land
s.
›S
ome
atte
ndee
s su
gges
ted
the
crea
tion
of a
n ou
tdoo
r es
tabl
ishm
ent,
such
as
a re
stau
rant
/caf
é/sn
ack
bar/
win
e ba
r. A
nd s
ome
note
d th
e re
venu
e ge
nera
ting
oppo
rtun
ity a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith s
uch
a re
tail
area
.
›M
any
com
men
ters
felt
the
area
wou
ld b
e m
ore
wel
com
ing
with
col
orfu
l, ac
cess
ible
si
gns
and
amen
ities
suc
h as
a v
isito
r’s
cent
er o
r ki
osk.
›S
ome
part
icip
ants
not
ed th
ey w
ould
not
like
to s
ee m
otor
ized
boa
ts a
djac
ent t
o re
stor
ed a
reas
.
›S
ome
atte
ndee
s su
gges
ted
limiti
ng h
uman
acc
ess
to th
e m
arsh
to th
e pe
rim
eter
an
d sm
all a
reas
, and
con
cent
ratin
g re
crea
tion
in p
ocke
ts.
›A
con
cent
rate
d sw
imm
ing
area
, pro
tect
ed fr
om b
oats
, in
De
Anz
a C
ove
was
su
gges
ted.
›A
num
ber
of r
ecre
atio
n op
port
uniti
es w
ere
sugg
este
d fo
r th
e pl
anni
ng a
rea,
in
clud
ing
a do
g pa
rk, p
layg
roun
d, c
omm
unity
gar
den,
mar
ina
or s
ki b
oat l
aunc
h.
How
ever
, som
e ex
pres
sed
conc
ern
that
thes
e am
eniti
es c
ould
neg
ativ
ely
affec
t re
stor
ed a
reas
.
›It
was
sug
gest
ed th
at r
emov
ing
the
exis
ting
chai
n-lin
k fe
nce
wou
ld im
prov
e th
e vi
sual
qua
lity
of th
e m
arsh
.
›R
ecre
atio
n op
port
uniti
es th
at w
ould
pro
vide
rev
enue
wer
e al
so s
ugge
sted
, suc
h as
ch
argi
ng a
fee
for
recr
eatio
nal u
se, a
llow
ing
cam
ping
for
a fe
e, a
nd in
corp
orat
ing
reta
il us
es in
to th
e re
stor
atio
n de
sign
.
TH
EM
E 5
: L
ON
G T
ER
M C
ON
SID
ER
AT
ION
S
›S
ome
com
men
ters
not
ed th
e ne
ed to
con
side
r lo
ng-t
erm
mai
nten
ance
issu
es, s
uch
as g
raffi
ti, p
oten
tial t
rans
ient
use
of t
he P
lann
ing
Are
a, a
nd tr
ash/
recy
clin
g. A
n on
-si
te c
aret
aker
and
offi
ce w
as a
lso
sugg
este
d.
›M
any
part
icip
ants
not
ed th
at fu
ndin
g av
aila
bilit
y an
d m
aint
enan
ce c
osts
sho
uld
be
a fa
ctor
in r
esto
ratio
n de
sign
.
TH
EM
E 6
: P
RO
JE
CT
SU
GG
ES
TIO
NS
›M
aps
show
ing
curr
ent l
andf
orm
s an
d co
ntou
rs in
rel
atio
n to
his
tori
c co
nditi
ons
and
pote
ntia
l fut
ure
sea
leve
l ris
e co
nditi
ons
wer
e su
gges
ted
›S
ome
com
men
ters
sug
gest
ed u
sing
vol
unte
ers,
incl
udin
g M
BH
S b
iolo
gy c
lass
es, t
o as
sist
with
res
tora
tion
effor
ts.
›S
ome
mee
ting
atte
ndee
s no
ted
that
hav
ing
mor
e m
aps
of th
e P
lann
ing
Are
a, a
s w
ell a
s co
mpu
ters
to a
cces
s th
e R
eWild
web
site
, at f
utur
e m
eetin
gs w
ould
impr
ove
part
icip
ant f
eedb
ack.
›A
req
uest
was
als
o m
ade
to p
rovi
de th
e pu
blic
with
acc
ess
to h
isto
rica
l eco
logy
re
port
s re
leva
nt to
the
Pla
nnin
g A
rea.
TH
EM
E 3
: L
AN
D U
SE
AN
D P
UB
LIC
FA
CIL
ITIE
S
›M
any
part
icip
ants
sug
gest
ed r
emov
al o
f the
gol
f cou
rse
and/
or m
odifi
catio
ns to
the
golf
cou
rse
to im
prov
e ha
bita
t and
wat
er q
ualit
y.
›Th
ere
wer
e m
ixed
opi
nion
s on
exi
stin
g sp
orts
faci
litie
s, s
uch
as th
e go
lf c
ours
e,
tenn
is c
ourt
s an
d ba
ll fi
elds
. Som
e su
gges
ted
mov
ing
athl
etic
faci
litie
s (s
uch
as
ballfi
elds
or
tenn
is c
ourt
s) to
a m
ore
appr
opri
ate
loca
tion
whi
le s
till s
uppo
rtin
g yo
uth
recr
eatio
n. O
ther
s no
ted
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f the
se fa
cilit
ies
to th
e lo
cal
com
mun
ity a
nd a
dvoc
ated
for
the
cont
inue
d av
aila
bilit
y of
thes
e fa
cilit
ies
in th
e sa
me
loca
tion.
›S
ome
part
icip
ants
men
tione
d th
e id
ea o
f mov
ing
the
exis
ting
recr
eatio
n fa
cilit
ies
to
a lo
catio
n ou
tsid
e th
e pl
anni
ng a
rea
and
rest
orin
g th
e cu
rren
t site
s to
wet
land
.
›S
ome
atte
ndee
s no
ted
that
Cam
plan
d ha
d be
en a
n im
port
ant p
art o
f the
co
mm
unity
and
sho
uld
be p
rese
rved
. A c
omm
ent w
as a
lso
mad
e as
sert
ing
that
C
ampl
and
prov
ides
pro
tect
ed a
reas
for
recr
eatio
n, lo
w-c
ost r
ecre
atio
n an
d ov
erni
ght a
ccom
mod
atio
ns, a
nd r
even
ue fo
r th
e C
ity. R
epre
sent
ing
oppo
sing
pe
rspe
ctiv
es, m
any
note
d th
at th
ey w
ould
like
to s
ee r
esto
ratio
n th
roug
hout
the
Pla
nnin
g A
rea,
incl
udin
g th
e ar
ea c
urre
ntly
occ
upie
d by
Cam
plan
d.
›S
ome
part
icip
ants
exp
ress
ed a
des
ire
for
impr
oved
pub
lic tr
ansi
t acc
ess
to th
e P
lann
ing
Are
a.
›S
ome
atte
ndee
s su
gges
ted
cons
ider
ing
pote
ntia
l rel
atio
nshi
ps to
Mis
sion
Bay
Hig
h S
choo
l in
publ
ic u
se a
nd r
esto
ratio
n de
cisi
ons.
›It
was
sug
gest
ed th
at th
e D
eAnz
a ar
ea b
e us
ed a
s pa
rk s
pace
for
activ
e re
crea
tion.
›It
was
als
o no
ted
that
mob
ile h
omes
and
RVs
with
in th
e P
lann
ing
Are
a m
ay n
ot
be a
esth
etic
ally
ple
asin
g. S
ugge
stio
ns w
ere
mad
e to
elim
inat
e th
ese
uses
, and
if
elim
inat
ion
is n
ot p
ossi
ble
it w
as s
ugge
sted
that
thes
e us
es o
ccur
onl
y in
C
ampl
and
beca
use
view
s in
to C
ampl
and
are
shie
lded
som
ewha
t by
tree
s.
GOAL 1RESTORESummary: Restore wetlands (aka “estuarine habitats”)
so they can help improve water quality, reduce flooding,
adapt to climate change, and support fish, birds, and other
animals & plants that live there.
Complete Draft Text: Restore, enhance and/or create
estuarine habitats (intertidal mudflat, salt marsh, tidal
channels, & marsh/upland ecotone) to provide ecosystem
functions and services, such as water quality improvement,
shoreline stabilization, carbon sequestration, resistance and
resilience to climate change and associated effects, and fish
& wildlife support.
GOAL 2PROTECT
Summary: Protect the wetlands from negative impacts of
human activity.
Complete Draft Text: Protect the existing and restored
estuarine habitat and associated wildlife from detrimental
anthropogenic impacts (direct and indirect) associated with
surrounding development.
GOAL 3PROVIDE
Summary: Provide ways for the community to engage
with natural resources through access, recreation, and
education.
Complete Draft Text: Provide new and/or improve
opportunities for public access, education, research,
and recreation in ways that improve understanding and
stewardship while protecting the existing and restored
estuarine habitats and associated wildlife.
Wh
at o
the
r g
oa
ls s
ho
uld
be
co
nsid
ere
d
as p
art
of
Re
Wild
Mis
sio
n B
ay?
›Sha
re a
ny o
ther
idea
s, c
omm
ents
, or
sug
gest
ions
.
Ho
w c
an
th
e d
raft
re
sto
rati
on
go
als
be
imp
rove
d?
›Tel
l us
how
you
wou
ld c
hang
e ea
ch o
f the
goa
ls.
›Mak
e ed
its, p
rovi
de a
dditi
ons,
or
sugg
est r
emov
ing
part
s of
a g
oal.
Ho
w c
an
th
e d
raft
re
sto
rati
on
go
als
be
imp
lem
en
ted
?
›Sha
re e
xam
ples
, bes
t-pr
actic
es,
idea
s, a
nd o
ther
way
s of
mak
ing
thes
e go
als
a re
ality
in M
issi
on
Bay
.
PR
OV
IDE
YO
UR
IN
PU
T!
Ther
e ar
e 4
way
s to
for
you
to p
rovi
de in
put:
1.
Com
plet
e a
“Goa
ls W
orks
heet
” to
mak
e su
gges
ted
edits
to th
e dr
aft r
esto
ratio
n go
als.
2.
Dra
w o
n a
map
to s
how
whe
re th
e dr
aft r
esto
ratio
n go
als
mak
e se
nse
to y
ou in
the
stud
y ar
ea.
3.
Pla
ce a
pos
t-it
note
on
the
boar
d be
low
to r
espo
nd to
the
ques
tions
.
4.
Sha
re a
ny o
ther
com
men
ts o
n a
com
men
t car
d.
Pla
ce p
ost-
it no
tes
belo
w th
e lin
e.P
lace
pos
t-it
note
s be
low
the
line.
Pla
ce p
ost-
it no
tes
belo
w th
e lin
e.
De
An
za
Re
vit
ali
za
tio
n
Pla
n A
rea
WH
AT
IS
TH
E D
E A
NZ
A R
EV
ITA
LIZ
AT
ION
PL
AN
? ›
An
effor
t of t
he C
ity o
f San
Die
go to
am
end
the
Mis
sion
Bay
Par
k M
aste
r P
lan.
›Th
e D
e A
nza
Rev
italiz
atio
n P
lan
will
pro
vide
gui
danc
e fo
r th
e de
velo
pmen
t of D
e A
nza
Poi
nt a
nd a
djac
ent
recr
eatio
nal f
acili
ties.
WH
AT
DO
ES
TH
E M
ISS
ION
BA
Y P
AR
K M
AS
TE
R P
LA
N C
UR
RE
NT
LY
RE
CO
MM
EN
D F
OR
D
E A
NZ
A P
OIN
T?
›B
efor
e no
w, t
he M
aste
r P
lan
didn
’t pr
ovid
e de
taile
d gu
idan
ce fo
r de
velo
pmen
t of D
eAnz
a P
oint
, but
did
in
clud
e sp
ecifi
c re
com
men
datio
ns fo
r ho
w th
e ar
ea s
houl
d be
use
d. (I
t is
refe
rred
to a
s a
“spe
cial
stu
dy
area
” or
SS
A in
the
Mas
ter
Pla
n.)
›Th
e M
aste
r P
lan
says
the
area
sho
uld
be d
evel
oped
to e
nhan
ce p
ublic
use
, wet
land
s cr
eatio
n “m
ust b
e co
nsid
ered
as
part
of t
he S
SA”
, and
impr
ovem
ents
to M
issi
on B
ay’s
wat
er q
ualit
y m
ust b
e “f
orem
ost i
n co
nsid
erat
ion.
”
›Th
e M
aste
r P
lan
says
up
to 6
0 ac
res
of D
eAnz
a P
oint
can
be
deve
lope
d as
gue
st h
ousi
ng a
nd
deve
lopm
ents
in th
e ar
ea s
houl
d in
clud
e hy
drol
ogic
impr
ovem
ents
that
saf
egua
rd n
earb
y m
arsh
are
as.
HO
W A
RE
RE
WIL
D M
ISS
ION
BA
Y A
ND
TH
E D
E A
NZ
A R
EV
ITA
LIZ
AT
ION
PL
AN
R
EL
AT
ED
? ›
All
of th
e pl
ans
for
the
nort
heas
t cor
ner
of M
issi
on B
ay (t
he e
xist
ing
Mis
sion
Bay
Par
k M
aste
r P
lan,
the
De
Anz
a R
evita
lizat
ion
Pla
n, a
nd s
ever
al c
omm
unity
-gen
erat
ed p
lans
) cal
l for
som
e de
gree
of w
etla
nds
rest
orat
ion
in th
e ar
ea fo
r th
e be
nefi
t of w
ildlif
e, w
ater
qua
lity,
and
get
ting
peop
le in
to n
atur
e.
›Th
e pu
rpos
e of
ReW
ild M
issi
on B
ay is
to a
nsw
er th
e qu
estio
n: H
ow c
an w
etla
nds
be r
esto
red
in th
e no
rthe
ast c
orne
r of
Mis
sion
Bay
? Th
is a
nsw
er w
ill in
form
oth
er p
lann
ing
proc
esse
s in
the
area
.
›H
ow to
res
tore
wet
land
s is
a v
ery
tech
nica
l que
stio
n re
quir
ing
engi
neer
ing
plan
s, h
ydro
logi
c st
udie
s,
wild
life
expe
rtis
e, a
nd la
ndsc
ape
arch
itect
s.
›R
eWild
Mis
sion
Bay
is p
rovi
ding
the
tech
nica
l exp
ertis
e an
d ro
bust
con
cept
ual p
lans
to th
e C
ity fo
r th
em to
inte
grat
e in
to th
eir
larg
er la
nd u
se p
lan
for
De
Anz
a as
wel
l as
for
Cam
plan
d by
the
Bay
(who
se
rest
orat
ion
the
City
is p
repp
ing
for
but h
as n
ot y
et b
egun
des
igni
ng).
HO
W A
RE
TH
E P
LA
NS
WO
RK
ING
TO
GE
TH
ER
? ›
All
of th
e te
chni
cal r
epor
ts a
nd p
lans
pro
duce
d by
ReW
ild M
issi
on B
ay a
re s
hare
d w
ith th
e C
ity a
s th
ey b
ecom
e av
aila
ble
in o
rder
to p
rovi
de in
form
atio
n th
at c
an in
flue
nce
the
outc
ome
of th
e D
eAnz
a R
evita
lizat
ion
Pla
n.
›C
ity o
f San
Die
go s
taff
mem
bers
(inc
ludi
ng th
e pr
ojec
t man
ager
for
the
De
Anz
a R
evita
lizat
ion
Pla
n) s
it on
ReW
ild M
issi
on B
ay’s
Sci
ence
& T
echn
ical
Adv
isor
y C
omm
ittee
.
›Th
e pr
ojec
t man
ager
for
ReW
ild M
issi
on B
ay s
erve
s as
the
Vice
Cha
ir o
f the
City
’s D
eAnz
a R
evita
lizat
ion
Pla
n A
d-H
oc C
omm
ittee
to e
nsur
e ro
bust
cro
ss-p
roje
ct c
oord
inat
ion.
CO
MP
AR
ISO
N O
F R
EW
ILD
MIS
SIO
N B
AY
AN
D D
E A
NZ
A R
EV
ITA
LIZ
AT
ION
PL
AN
R
eW
ild
Mis
sio
n B
ay
D
eA
nz
a R
ev
ita
liz
ati
on
Pla
n
Geo
grap
hyB
road
er g
eogr
aphy
- w
hole
nor
thea
st c
orne
r of
M
issi
on B
ay.
Nar
row
er g
eogr
aphy
- ju
st D
e A
nza
Poi
nt a
nd th
e ad
jace
nt fa
cilit
ies.
Sco
peN
arro
wer
sco
pe -
wet
land
s re
stor
atio
n an
d pu
blic
acc
ess
for
the
bene
fit o
f wild
life
and
the
com
mun
ity.
Bro
ader
sco
pe -
full
land
use
pla
n fo
r ha
bita
t re
stor
atio
n, g
uest
hou
sing
, and
upd
ates
to n
earb
y re
crea
tiona
l fac
ilitie
s.
Ho
w a
re R
eW
ild
Mis
sio
n B
ay
an
d t
he
Cit
y o
f S
an
Die
go
Wo
rkin
g T
og
eth
er?
