Upload
navuduri-nageswara-rao
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/11/2019 rhyzobium
1/13
P l a n t a n d S o i l X X V I , n o . 1 F e b r u a r y 1 9 6 7
M E T H O D S O F D E T E C T I O N A N D E S T I M A T I O N O F
R H I Z O B I A I N S O I L
b y J . A . T H O M P S O N * a n d J . M . V I N C E N T * *
M i c r o b i o l og y L a b o r a t o r y , S c h o o l f A g r i c u l t u r e , U n i v e r s i t y o f S y d r l ey ,
S y d n e y , N e w S o u t h W a l e s , A u s t r a l i a
I N T R O D U C T I O N
D e t e c t i o n o f s p e c if ic r h i z o b i a i n so ll , a n d t h e i r q u a n t i t a t i v e d e -
t e r m i n a t i o n , a r e e s s e n t i a l f o r e c o l o g i c a l s t u d i e s a i m e d a t d e f i n i n g
t h e f a t e o f r h i z o b i a o n s e e d a n d s e e d l in g , a n d t h e i r p e r s i s t e n c e f o r
l o n g e r p e r i o d s i n t h e s o l l a n d r h i z o s p h e r e . S u c h d e f i n i t i v e i s o l a t i o n
o f r h i z o b i a f r o m t h e s o i l , i n w h i c h a t t h e b e s t t h e y a r e l i k e l y t o
c o n s t i t u t e a s m a ll a n d n o t v e r y v i g o r o u s p a r t o f t h e t o t a l p o p u l a t i o n ,
r e s t s o n t h e i r c a p a c i t y t o n o d u l a t e a s p e c if ic l e g u m i n o u s h o s t . P r e -
c is i on i n d e t e r m i n i n g t h e n u m b e r o f r h i z o b i a w il l t h e n d e p e n d o n t h e
a g r e e m e n t b e t w e e n t h e n u m b e r i n t h e so il a n d t h e n u m b e r e s t i m a t e d
b y w h a t i s n e c e s s a r i l y a n i n d i re c t m e t h o d . T h e p r i n c ip l e o f t h i s
i n d i r e c t ( p l a n t - d i l u t i o n o r p l a n t i n f e c t i o n ) c o u n t ( W i l s o n 13)
h a s b e e n f o ll o w e d b y o th e r s i n t e r e s te d i n t h e q u a n t i t a t i v e r e c o v e r y
o f rh i z o b i a f r o m s o il a n d o t h e r b i o l o g i c a l ly c o m p l e x s i t u -
a t i o n s 1 2 6 10 11. P u r e c u l t u r e s o f rh i z o b i a a p p e a r t o o f f e r n o p a r t i -
c u l a r d i f f i c u l t y i n o b t a i n i n g r e l i a b l e c o u n t s b y a p l a n t - d i l u t i o n
t e c h n i q u e i n tu b e s . A c o n s i d e r a b l e b o d y o f p u b l i s h e d 2 a n d u n -
p u b l i s h e d d a t a f r o m t h i s l a b o r a t o r y s h o w e d l it t le d i f f er e n c e b e -
t w e e n t h e p l a t e a n d p l a n t c o u n t s f o r m e a n s b a s e d o n 5 0 c o m p a r is o n s
w i t h c l o v e r a n d 3 4 w i t h l u c e r n e .
T h e s i t u a t i o n a s t o r e c o v e r y f r o m s o il i s l e s s c l e ar . I t i s d i f f i c u l t t o
i n t e r p r e t T u z i m u r a a n d W a t a n a b e ' s f i n d i n g s i n t h e p r e s en c e o f s o il
P r e s e n t a d d r e s s : N e w S o u t h W a l e s D e p a r t m e n t o f A g r i c u l t u re , R e s e a r c h S t a t i o n ,
T a m w o r t h , N . S . W . , A u s t r a l i a .
P r e se l xt a d d r e s s : S c h o o l o f B io l o g ic a l S c ie n c e s , U l l i v e r s i t y o f N e w S o u t h W a l e s ,
K e n s i rl g t or l , N . S . W . , A u s t r a l i a .
7 2
8/11/2019 rhyzobium
2/13
8/11/2019 rhyzobium
3/13
8/11/2019 rhyzobium
4/13
D E T E C T I O N A N D E S T I M A T I O N O F R H I Z O B I A I N S O IL 7 5
i n e a c h c o r e . C r o s s - c o n t a m i n a t i o n h a s , o f c o u r s e , t o b e a v o i d e d a n d c o n d i t i o n s
m a d e s a t i s f a c t o r y f o r n o d u l e f o r m a t i o n .
T h e c h o i c e w h e t h e r t o r e m o v e t h e e n c l o s e d c o r e o f s o i l ( w i t h a s e p t i c p r e -
c a u t i o n s ) o r l e a v e i t n s tu d e p e n d s o n c o n d i t i o n s ( r a i n f a l l , t e m p e r a t u r e ) .
I n a n y c a s e t h e s p a t i a l r e l a t i o n s h i p o f t h e t o p 1 2 c m o f s o il c a n b e r e t a i n e d
d u r i n g t h e c o u r s e o f t h e t e s t . I n t h e s e s t u d i e s c o r e s w e r e t r a n s p o r t e d i n p l a s t i c
j a r s , w h i c h p r o v i d e d p r o t e c t i o n f r o m c o n t a m i n a t i o n a n d a l l o w e d w a t e r i n g
f r o m t h e b o t t o m o f t h e c o r e d u r i n g t h e c o u r s e o f t h e e x p e r i m e n t .
T h e p r e s e n c e o r a b s e n c e o f n o d u l e s i n t h i s c a s e c a n b e e x p r e s s e d a s a t l e a s t
o n e ( o r l e s s t h a n o n e ) r h i z o b i u m p e r s o i l c o r e ( a p p r o x . 7 0 0 g ) .
R E S U L T S
A R ec ov er y o / r h i z o b i a / r o m a c ou nte d p @ u l a t i o n
C o m p a r i s o n s o f a s s e m b l y a n d c o n d i t i o n s o f t e s t i n g . T h e
q u a n t i t a t i v e r e c o v e r y o f r h i z o b ia in p u r e c u l t u r e c h e c k e d a g a i n s t
t h e r e g u l a r p l a te c o u n t ) w a s c o m p a r e d w i t h s e v e r a l a s se m b l ie s a n d
t w o c o n d i t i o n s o f t e s t i n g T a b l e 1). A g a r tu b e s g a r e s a t i s f a c t o r y
r e c o v e r y e x c e p t o n o c c as io n 3 i n th e g l a ss h o u s e w h e r e t e m p e r a t u r e
h a d b e e n e x c e s s iv e ) , a n d w e r e s u p e r i o r t o t h e o t h e r a s s e m b li e s.
T A B L E 1
I n f l u e n c e of a s s e m b l y a n d g r o w t h c o n d i t io n s o ll re c o v e r y o f r h i z o b i a f r o m c o u n t e d
p u r e s u s p e n s i o n s
P l a t e e s t i m a t e s P l a n t t e s t s
O c -
c a s i o n
L o g p I a t e
c o l o n y L o g p l a t e
M P N
c o u n t
2 . 6 4 2 . 1 9
1 7 5 1 7 7
9 . 3 2 1 0 . 0 0
C o n d i t i o n s o f g r o w t h
A s s e m b l y L o c a t i o n
A g a r t u b e s L i g h t r o o m
A g a r t u b e s L i g h t r o o m
A g a r t u b e s L i g h t r o o m
A g a r t u b e s G l a s s h o u s e
S a n d t u b e s L i g h t r o o m
S a n d t u b e s G l a s s h o u s e
S a n d b o t t l e s G l a s s h o u s e
L o g p l a n t
M P N
2 . 5 2
1 7 7
9 . 4 9
8 . 4 9
7 . 2 4
8 . 0 0
7 . 7 6
L o g p l a t e
c o i o n y
c o u n t - - l o g
p l a n t M P N
0 . 1 2
- - 0 . 0 2
- - 0 . 1 7
0 . 8 3
2 . 0 8
1 3 2
1 5 6
9 5 f i d u c i a l l i m i t s f o r l o g M P N e s t i m a t e s o n o c c a s i o n 3 = - - 0. 54 .
D e t a i l e d p r o c e d u r e s w i t h a g a r t u b e s . T a b le 2 g iv es r es u l t s
o f s ix c o m p a r i s o n s b e t w e e n t h e p l a t e c o u n t a n d p l a n t c o u n t s w i t h
e a c h o f s ix t e s t i n g p r o c e d u r e s . A l l s h o w e d a d i f f e r e n c e i n f a v o u r o f
t h e p l a t e c o u n t , b u t g e n e r a l l y t h e p l a n t c o u n t w a s a s g o o d a s t h e
p l a t e - M P N . T r e a t m e n t 2 w a s t h e p r o c e d u r e n o r m a l l y f o ll o w e d i n
t h e s e s t u d i e s .
8/11/2019 rhyzobium
5/13
7 6 j . A .
THOMPSON AND J. M. VINCENT
TABLE 2
Effect of modificati ons of agar- tube techniq ue on recover y of rhizobi a from a
counted pure suspension
Procedure Log plant
MPN
Treatment
No.
Seed
Sterilised
Sterilised
Sterilised
Sterilised
Unsterile
Unsterile
Sowing
Immedia te
Immediate
Soaked
Soaked
Immediate
Immediate
I Inoculation
Immediate
Delayed
Immediate
Delayed
Immediate
Delayed
1 6 7
2.11
1 9 8
1 7 9
1 9 8
1 9 8
Log plate count --
Log plant MPN
0.52
0 08
0.21
Q 40
0.21
0.21
Log pla te coun t = 2.19 Log pl ate MPN = 1.87
95 fiducial limi ts for log MPN with each tr eat men t = ~ 0.36
B Recovery o~ rhizobia /ro m soil
T h e e f f e c t o f a s s e m b l y . P r ev i o us i nd ic a t io n s th a t t h e a g ar
t u b e m i g h t b e u n f a v o u r a b l e t o t h e r e c o v e r y o f r h i z o b ia f r o m s p a rs e
p o p u l a t i o n s i n t h e s o il , l e d u s t o t e s t t h e l a r g e r a s s e m b l y o f t h e b o t t l e
j a r , a n d t o s u b s t i t u t e s a n d f o r a g a r i n t h e t u b e . A l t h o u g h e x p e r i e n c e
w i t h c o u n t e d s u s p e n s i o n s o f r h i z o b i a i n p u r e c u l t u r e w a s i n f e ri o r
w i t h t h e s e m o d i f i c a t i o n s T a b l e 1), t h e u s e o f s a n d d i d in I a c t s h o w
a t r e n d n o t s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n if ic a n t) t o w a r d s b e t t e r r e c o v e r y f r o m
so i l Ta b le 3 ) .
TABLE 3
The effect of ass embl y in the detect ion of rhizobia in soff*
Number of assemblies
Form of assembly
With nodules With out nodules
Agar tubes . . . . . . . . . . . 16 32
Sand tubes . . . . . . . . . . . 23 25
Bottle jars (sand) . . . . . . . . . 24 24
* Added in equal number of 1-g and 0.1-g samples for each assembly.
X~ agar (tubes) r s . sand (tubes and bottles) 3 . 2 P < 0.10 and > 0.05.
C o m p a r i s o n o f i n d i r e c t C o u n t s a n d d i r e c t n o d u l a t i o n
t r i a l s . T w e n t y - f o u r f i e ld p l o t s w e r e e x a m i n e d f o r s u r v i v i n g c l o v e r
r h i z o b i a a s j u d g e d b y t h e i r a b i l i t y t o n o d u l a t e s o w n s te r il i s ed s e e d
a n d i n d i r e c t l y b y m e a n s o f t h e p l a n t d i lu t io n c o u n t . T h e d i r ec t
m e t h o d s i n v o l v e d :
i) s o w i n g a s h o r t r o w o f s e e d i n e a c h p l o t ; a n d
8/11/2019 rhyzobium
6/13
D E T E C T I O N A N D E S T I M A T I O N O F R H I Z O B I A I N S O I L 7 7
ii) removing four soil cores from each plot, sowing them with
sterilised seed and maintaining them in the glasshouse.
The count was done on a 2 cm wide 5 cm deep sample, t aken
from each core, mixed thoroug hly and used for an MPN estimate b y
the agar tube method.
The results are summarised in Table 4, grouping the samples ac-
cording to the indirect quantitative estimate. The two direct
methods agree well r = 0.77, P < 0.01; based on arc sin ~/per
cent). With one exception, the seedlings, whether sown in field or
core, were all nodulated when the recoverable rhizobia exceeded
1 per g of soil. All cases bu t one of less tha n 1 rhizobium per gram
were accompanied by reduced nodulation in both the field mean,
55 per cent) and core methods 65 per cent).
T A B L E 4
D i r e c t a n d i n d i r e c t d e m o n s t r a t i o n o f r h iz o b i a i n s ol l
% N o d u l a t e d P l a n t s
o il s g r a d e d b y p l a n t d i lu t i o n c o u n t
(per g so i l )
> 10
1 - 1 0
< 1
479
38
36
10
5
5
2
F i e l d [ C o r e
100 / 100 /
1~60/ 95 170l 92
100 ] 100
100 [ 100
1 0 0 / 100 100 100 .
1 0 o j 1 0 0 ,
78 50
70 6
58 . 55 100 ~ 65
3 63
14 50
The degree of nodulatio n in the sown soll was more tha n one might
have expected from the counts. The roots of the plants from field
treatments with less than 100 per cent nodulation carried few nod-
ules at the top 5-cm zone from which the count had beep made.
Nodulation of the plants sown in field or core would then have
reflected an exploration of a greater depth of soff.
Re co ve ry at low er soi l d i lu t i on s . A large col lect ion of
samples from what appeared to be a sparsely popula ted soil was tested
8/11/2019 rhyzobium
7/13
78 j .
A . T H O M P S O N A N D J . M . V I N C E N T
f o r t h e n o d u l a t i o n o f c l o v e r w i t h t h e a g a r t u b e m e t h o d , u s i n g fo u r in -
c r e a s in g d i lu t io ns e qu iv a l e n t t o 1, 0 . 1 , 0 . 01 , a n d 0 .001 g so i l pe r t ub e .
S i x t y - o n e s a m p l e s g a v e a t l e a s t o n e p o s i t i v e t u b e b u t s o m e o f t h e s e
t h o u g h p o s i t i v e a t h i g h e r d i l u t io n w e r e n e g a t i v e a t a l o w e r d i l u t i o n
m o r e s o i l) . I t w a s e s s e n t i a l t o a r r i v e a t a n a p p r a i s a l o f t h e s i g n if i-
c a n c e o f s u c h s k i p s .
T o f a c i l it a t e p r e s e n t a t i o n , t h e n e g a t i v e t u b e s h a v e b e e n c l as s if ie d
a s f o l lo w s a n d i l lu s t r a t e d w i t h tw o r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s a m p l e s T a b l e
5 A ) : Sk - n e g a t i v e t u b e s a t l e a s t o n e t e n f o l d d i l u t i o n b e l o w a
p o s i t i v e t u b e A 1 ) ; t w o t e n - f o l d d i l u t i o n s b e l o w A 2 ) ; Paired negative
- n e g a t i v e t u b e a t t h e s a m e d i l u t i o n a s t h e h i g h e s t p o s i t i v e t u b e
B ) ; Normal negative - n e g a t i v e t u b e a t o n e t e n - f o l d d i l u t i o n a b o v e
t h e h i g h e s t p o s i t i v e C ) o r a t t h e l o w e s t d i l u t i o n o f a w h o l l y n e g a t i v e
se r ie s D) .
O b s e r v a t i o n s o f n e g a t i v e t u b e s s h o w e d t h a t t h e s e e d l in g s c ar r i e d
r o o t h a i r s s o t h a t i n f e c t io n s i t e s w e r e a v a i l a b le . T u b e s w e r e t h e n
e x a m i n e d f o r t h e p r e s e n c e o f r h iz o b i a b y b r e a k i n g u p t h e a g a r a n d
t h e p l a n t , a n d t h o r o u g h l y s h a k i n g w i t h g la s s b e a d s a n d 1 0 m l s t e ri le
T A B L E 5
R e - t e s t o f c o n t e a t s o f p o s i t i v e a n d n e g a t i v e p l a n t t n b e s
A . S a m p l e d e s i g n a t i o n o f n e g a t i v e t u b e s
W e i g h t o f s o il i n s u b - s a m p l e g )
S a m p l e R e p l i c a t io n
1 I 0 . 1 [ O .O 1 I 0 . 0 0 1
1 i ) + + - - B ) - - C )
i i) - - A ~ ) i - - A 1 ) + - - C )
2 i ) - -
D )
,] - - - - - -
i i ) - - D ) [ - - - - - -
B . R e - t e s t r e s u l t *
S t a t u s a t I s t t e s t N o d u l a t i n g [ N o n - n o d u l a t i n g P e r e e n t +
P o s i t i v e .
S k i p s A ~
S k i p s A 1
P a i r e d n e g a t i v e s B
N o r m a l n e g a t i v e s C
N o r m a l n e g a t i v e s D . . . .
2 2
9
1 2
9
5
4
1
6
1 5
3 O
4 6
1 1 4
9 6
6 0
4 5
2 3
1 0
3
* + t u b e i n t h e r e - t e s t i n d i c a t e s t h e p r e s e n c e o f a t le a s t 2 0 r h i z o b i a i n t h e s a m p l e d t u b e .
8/11/2019 rhyzobium
8/13
D E T E C T I O N A N D E S T I M A T I O N O F R H I Z O B I A I N S O I L 7 9
water. Duplicate 0.5-ml aliquots were then added to freshly grown
plants in agar tubes and later examined for nodulation. Results
along with a check of positive tubes are given in Table 5B.
Few of the nor mal negatives were re-graded positive (C > D).
Skips were commonly positive (A > A,) and paired negatives were
intermediate between normal negatives and skips. The failure of
some skips to yield rhizobia might reflect a very uneven di stribution
of rhizobia between aliquots, but could as likely be due to failure of
the few rhizobia to survive in a competitive, and perhaps antago-
nistic, biotie environment in the original tube.
C In]luence o/added soil on the recovery o/rhizobia
Complete evaluation of the data obtained above was prevented
by the lack of any preeise information on the actual number of
rhizobia. A comprehensive experiment was therefore designed to
examine the effect of soil added to the tube on detection of known
numbers from a pure suspension. The results with 8 replicates of a
4-fold serial dilution are shown in Table 6.
T A B L E 6
R e e o v e r y o f r h i z o b i a f r o m p u r e c u l t u r e w i t h a n d w i t h o u t a d d i t i o n o f s o il t o a g a r t u b e s
A d d e d s o l l ( g / t u b e )
S t e r i l i se d ] U n s t e r i l e
0 0
0 0 . 0 1
0 1
1 0
1 0 0 1
1 1
T u b e s w i t h n o d u l e s fo r
S u c c e s s iv e F o u r f o l d D i l u t io n s *
L o g M P N
3 2 . 5 2
3 2 . 7 1
0 2 . 0 3
4 2 . 9 1
0 2 . 1 9
0 1 . 4 9
E x p e c t e d P o s i t iv e s
P o s i t i v e P l a t e s
C a l c n l a t e d r h i z o b i a
p e r t u b e * * 4 0 0 1 0 0 2 5
9 5 f i d u e ia l l i m i t s f o r l o g M P N o f e a e h t r e a t m e n t
* 8 t u b e s t e s t e d a t e a e h d i l u t i o n .
* * B a s e d o n p l a t e s e o u n t e d a t s u i t a b l e d i l u t i o n s .
8 8
8 3
6 1 .6
=
I 0.33
3 2 . 6 1
1 2 1 9
0 . 4
Detection of very small numbers was poor in the presence of 1 g
soil, whether unsterile or re-contaminated with some unsterile soil.
In fact, the presence of a large amount of unsterile soll could 1essen
8/11/2019 rhyzobium
9/13
8 0 J . A . T H O M P S O N A N D J . M . V I N C E N T
r e l i a b i li t y e r e n w i t h t h e a d d i t i o n o f a f a i r l y l a r g e n u m b e r o f rh i z o b ia .
T w o f u r t h e r e x p e r i m e n t s g a r e s m a l l , t h o u g h n o t s i g n i f i c a n t , d e -
p r e s s io n s w h e n 1 g s ol l w a s a d d e d t o a g a r p l a n t - t u b e s u s e d i n t h e
r e c o v e r y o f c o u n t e d r h iz o b ia .
T a b l e 7 g i v e s r e s u l t s o f a m o r e c o m p r e h e n s i v e e x p e r i m e n t e x -
a m i n i n g r e c o v e r y o f A ) a c o u n t e d p u r e c u l t u r e a n d B ) a d i f f e r e n t
p o p u l a t i o n i n s oi l i ts e lf . T h e a d d i t i o n o f u n s t e r i l e s o ff c a u s e d a c o n -
s i s te n t d e p r e s s io n w h i c h w a s m o r e m a r k e d w h e n c o n t a m i n a t i n g s oil
m i c r o - o r g a n is m s h a d h a d a d d i t i o n a l t im e t o b e c o m e e s t a b li s h e d b e-
l o r e i n o c u l a t i o n A iii). T h e a d d i t i o n a l s o ff r e p r e s e n t e d in B i v) a p -
p e a r s t o h a v e e x e r c i s e d a f u r t h e r d e p r e s s i n g e f f e c t.
T A B L E 7
R e c o v e r y o f r h i z o b i a a f t e r t h e a d d i t i o n o f u n s t e r i l e s o ff t o a g a r t u b e s
S o ff a d d e d a t S o f f a d d e d 7 d a y s
R h i z o b i a l s o u r e e i n o c u l a t i o n b e f o r e i n o c u l a t i o n L o g M P N *
g) g)
A .
B .
i ) P u r e c u l t u r e
i i ) P u r e c u l t u r e
iii) P u r e c u l t u r e
i v ) P u r e c u l t u r e
i) S o il s u s p e n s i o n
ii) S o i l s u s p e n s i o n
iii) S o i l s u s p e n s i o n
i v) S o f f s u s p e n s i o n
v ) S o l l - i n - s o l l
v i ) So i l - i l l - so i l
q
0 . 5
0 . 5
0 . 5
0 . 5
0 . 5
0 . 5
0 . 5
0 . 5
0 . 5
0 . 5
0 . 5
1 7 7
1 3 7
0 . 8 8
0 . 8 8
> 4 . 2 6
3 . 9 2
3 . 6 8
2 . 9 9
2 . 1 3
1 7 7
* L e a s t s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e P = . 0 S) , 0 . 6 5 .
A n a t t e m p t t o s i m u l a t e t h e c o n d i ti o n o f h a v i n g f e w r h iz o b i a in
t h e s o ll, a n d h a v i n g t h e t o t a l s o ll r e c e i v e d b y e a c h t u b e c o n s t a n t ,
w a s m a d e d i l u t i n g t h e s o il b e i n g a s s a y e d i n r h i z o b i u m - f r e e so ff s u c-
c e s s iv e l y b y f ir s t b r e a k i n g t h e a g g r e g a t e s t h o r o u g h l y i n m o r t a r a n d
p e s tl e, a n d t h e n m i x i n g in t h o r o u g h l y w i t h o u t a d d i t i o n o f w a t e r
T a b le 7 , B v , v i) ). T h e r e c o v e r y w a s v e r y p o o r w h e n c o m p a r e d w i t h
t h e c o r r e s p o n i n g w a t e r - d i l u t e d se r ie s B iii a n d i v) . T h i s p o o r r e -
c o v e r y s e e m e d f ir s t t o i n d i c a te t h a t t h e r e h a d b e e n i n a d e q u a t e d is -
p e r s i o n o f t h e i n i t i a l s a m p l e i n s u c c e s s iv e d il u ti o n s . A n i n d e p e n d e n t
c h e c k d o n e w i t h t h e 1 0 a n d 1 0 0 s o i l - i n - s o i l d i l u t i o n s s h o w e d
r e a s o n a b le a g r e e m e n t b e t w e e n t h e m 90 0 a n d 150 r e c o v e r e d ). A p -
8/11/2019 rhyzobium
10/13
D E T E C T I O N A N D E S T I M A T I O N O F R H I Z O B I A I N S O I L 81
plying these results, the relationship between number of rhizobia
added per tube can be set out as follows (using an average figure for
the best estimate)
A m o u n t o f s o il
l g
E x p e c t e d f r o m B i) T a b l e 7 ) . . 1 8 0 00
I n t e r n a l c h e c k 1 2 00 0
E x p e c t e d + t u b e s . 8
, F o u n d + t u b e s . . . . . . . . I 8 ,
0 . l g
1 8 0 0
1 2 0 0
8
8
0 l g ] . 0 0 l g
180 18
120 12
8 8
6 1
[ . 0 0 0 l g
1.8
1 .2
6
0
It seemed likely, therefore, that rhizobia were present but un-
detected at the greater dilutions. This possibility was confirmed
when the tube contents of the only
' s k i p ' ,
and of Iour 'paired nega-
tives' were resuspended in water and tested for the presence of rhi-
zobia as al rea dy described. All were positive on re-test as was one of
two nor mal negat ives at dilution 5. Failure to suspend the rhi-
zobia in liquid suspension, had interfered with detection, probably
because of greater difficul ty in establishing contact with the root
surface.
D I S C U S S I O N
The present data afford further evidence of the reliability of a
plant-dilution count of pure suspension of clover rhizobia when
based on agar slopes or deeps. They can be summarise d in terms of 11
comparisons with the plate counts and the lan t-dilution count th at
yielded the following average Iigures:
L o g p l a t e c o u n t I L o g p l a t e M P N L o g p l a n t M P N
4 . 1 8 ] 4 . 0 9 4 . 1 7
The presence of soil, however, can seriously affect the quanti tat ive
recovery of rhizobia. The difficu lty was shown in the first instance
when soils having rhizobia sufficient to permit nodulation at higher
dilutions had excessive negative ( s k i p ) tubes at lower dilutions in
the presenee of a relatively large amount of unsterile soil. The fact
th at a large proport ion of these skip tubes (45 to 6o per cent - Table
5B) was found to contain viable clover rhizobia on further exami-
nation argued against failure to disperse the bacteria randomly, a nd
indicated rather tha t a sufIiciently unfavourable environment had
8/11/2019 rhyzobium
11/13
8 2 J A T H O M P S O N A N D J M V I N C E N T
b e e n e s t a b l i s h e d i n t h e s k i p t u b e t o p r e v e n t n o d u l a t i o n . I t i s a l s o
q u i t e l i k e l y t h a t s o m e o f t h e s k i p t u b e s , i n w h i c h r h i z o b i a c o u l d n o t
b e d e m o n s t r a t e d b y f u r t h e r i s o la ti o n , h a d b e c o m e s u ff i ci e n tl y u n -
f a v o u r a b l e f o r t h e i r i n h i b i t i o n o r d e a t h .
P o s i t i v e e v i d e n c e o f t h e u n f a v o u r a b l e a c t i o n o f a r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e
a m o u n t o f u n s t e r i le s o il i s p r o v i d e d i n T a b l e s 6 a n d 7 . T h e i n t e rf e r in g
e f f e c t w a s a f u n c t i o n o f a m o u n t o f s o i l , i t s c o n t e n t o f o t h e r m i c r o -
o r g a n i s m s a r e l a t i v e l y s m a l l q n a n t i t y o f u n s t e r i l e so il .0 1 g ) b e i n g
a b l e t o c r e a t e a n u n s a t i s f a c t o r y t u b e e n v i r o n m e n t w i t h 1 g s t er i le
s o il ), a n d t h e l e n g t h o f t i m e t h e i n t e r fe r i n g p o p u l a t i o n h a d t o e s -
t a b l i sh i t s e l f Ta b le 7 ) .
T h e d i f f i c u l t y i n th e c a s e o f s o il s h a v i n g a t l e a s t a f e w h u n d r e d
r h i z o b i a p e r g i s n o t l i k e l y t o b e t o o s e ri o u s , i n t h a t h i g h e r d i l u t i o n s
a r e l i k e l y t o y i e l d p o s i t i v e s a n d j u d i c i o u s n o t i c e c a n b e t a k e n o f
s k i ps , e i t h e r q u a n t i t a t i v e l y o r i n p r e s e n t i n g a n d i n t e r p r e t i n g t h e
r e s u lt s . T h e r e a l p r o b l e m l ie s i n th e v a l i d i t y o f d e t e r m i n a t i o n s w i t h
v e r y l o w n u m b e r s f or w h i ch t h e d i lu t io n s e x p e c t e d t o b e p o s i ti v e
w o u l d h a v e t h e c o m b i n a t i o n o f a l a rg e a m o n n t o f s o il 1 -0 .1 g ) a n d
f e w r h i z o b i a .
T h e f i r s t a p p r o a c h t o t h i s i s t o s u b s t i t u t e f o r t h e a g a r t u b e a n
a s s e m b l y w h i c h m i g h t , b e c a u s e o f a m o r e p o r o u s s u p p o r t m a t e r ia l
a n d / o r i t s s iz e, p e r m i t l a rg e r s a m p l e s o f s o il t o b e a d d e d w i t h o u t
h a v i n g t h e s a m e u n d e s i r a b l e e f f e c t s . I n f a c t t h e t r e n d t o w a r d s s u -
p e r i o r i t y o f b o t t l e j a r s , a n d e v e n s a n d t u b e s , o v e r a g a r t u b e s , i n
T a b l e 3 w o n l d b e e n c o u r a g i n g w e r e i t n o t f o r t h e i r c o n s i d e r a b l e
i n f e r i o r i t y i n r e c o v e r i n g rh i z o b i a i n p u r e c u l t u r e t e s t s T a b l e 1).
B r o c k w e l l 1 a ls o f o u n d v e rm i c u l it e t u b e s u n d e r e s t im a t e d a p u re
c l o v e r p o p u l a t i o n .
T h e e x p e r i m e n t i n w h i c h l o w - c o u n t so il s w e r e s i m u l a t e d b y s o i l-
i n -s o i l d i l u t i o n T a b l e 7 B , v a n d v i ) n o t o n l y e m p h a s i s e d t h e d i f fi -
c u l t y o f r e c o v e r i n g a f e w r h iz o b i a i n a r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e a m o u n t o f s o ll
b u t a l s o a c c e n t u a t e d a p o s s i b l e s p a t i a l f a c t o r t h a t c o u l d d e l a y c o n -
t a c t b e t w e e n t h e f e w r h i z o b i a p r o b a b l y i n d i s c r e te m i c ro - c o lo n i e s)
a n d t h e r o o t s u rf a c e. T h e a d d i t i o n o f s u f f ic i e n t w a t e r w i t h t h e s o il
a n d s o m e d e g re e o f a g i t at i o n i n t h e t u b e w o u l d p r o b a b l y o v e r c o m e
t h i s p a r t o f t h e p r o b l e m .
F i n a l l y o u r e x p e r ie n c e e m p h a s i s e s t h e v a l u e o f d i r e ct , t h o u g h o n l y
s e m i - q u a n t i t a t i v e , m e t h o d s f o r t e s t i n g f o r r h i z o b i a in s p a r s e l y p o p u -
l a t e d s o ll s. S o il a m e l i o r a t io n , f r e e d o m f r o m c o n t a m i n a t i o n a n d
8/11/2019 rhyzobium
12/13
D E T E C T I O N A N D E S T I M A T I O N O F R H I Z O B I A I N S O I L 8 3
mainten ance of adequate moisture will all be impor tant in such tests.
The fact that the rhizobium-free seedling will be able to explore a
reasonable volume of soll means that it can provide information on
the spatial distdbution of rhizobia and give some idea of their rela-
tive abundance.
The search for better assemblies and substrates needs to be per-
sisted with in order to fill the gap in the quantitative assessment of
the sparsely populated soil. Meanwhile a combination of the plant
dilution count in agar tubes and direct sowing of rhizobia-free seed
can be depended onto define the situation within reasonable limits.
Some degree of secondary inoculation, looking for rhizobia in se-
lected negative tubes, could help with the plant-dilution count in
the more importa nt difficult cases comp. Table 5B).
S U M M A R Y
T h e p l a n t - i n f e c t i o n t e c h n i q u e f o r t h e e s t i m a t i o n o f r h i zo b i a , i n w h i c h
s m a l l - s e e d e d h o s t s a r e g r o w n o n a g a r w i t h i n t e s t - t u b e s , i s a p p l i c a b l e t o s o il s
w i t h a m o d e r a t e r h i z o b i a l p o p u l a t i o n i n t h e o r d e r o f a t l e a s t 1 0 0 /g ). A c c o u n t
m i g h t h a v e t o b e t a k e n o f
skips
l es s d i l u t e d : n e g a t i v e , w h e n m o r e d i l u t e d
a r e p o s i t i v e ) l i k e l y t o r e s u l t , a t l e a s t i n p a r t , I r o m u n f a v o u r a b l e c o n d i t i o n s f o r
r h i z o b i a l s u r v i v a l , m u l t i p l i c a t i o n o r n o d u l a t i o n . B e c a u s e o f s u c h e f fe c t s, a
s p a r s e p o p u l a t i o n i n t h e o r d e r o f 1 0/g ) m a y n o t b e d e t e c t e d e v e n w i t h o u t
d i l u t i o n 1 g s o il p e r p l a n t t u b e ) . L o c a l i s a t i o n o f r h i z o b i a i n t h e s o i l i s l i k e l y
t o b e i m p o r t a n t i n d e t e rm i n i n g c o n t a c t w i t h t h e p l a n t r o o t s in t h e d i lu t io n
c o u n t a n d i n s a m p l i n g f r o m t h e f ie ld . D i f fi c u l t i es w i t h s p a r s e ly p o p u l a t e d
s o il s c a n b e p a r t l y o v e r c o m e b y c a r e f u l l y c o n d u c t e d d i r e c t s o w i n g s o f s t e ri l is e d
s e e d , p r e f e r a b l y i n t h e C O llI in es o f co r es , e i t h e r l e i t i n t h e f i e l d o r b r o u g h t b a c k
t o t h e g l a s s b o u s e .
A C K N O W L E D G M E N T
T h e w o r k r e p o r t e d i n t h i s p a p e r h a s b e e n s u p p o r t e d b y r e s e a r c h fu n d s
f r o m t h e U n i v e r s i t y o f S y d n e y , t h e R u r a l C r e d i ts D e v e l o p m e n t F u n d o f t h e
R e s e r v e B a n k o f A u s t r a l i a a n d b y W h e a t I n d u s t r y R e s e a r e h F u n d s .
Received October 25, 1965
8/11/2019 rhyzobium
13/13
8 DETECTION AND ESTIMATION OF RHIZOBIA IN SOIL
REFERENCES
1 Br oe kw el l, J., Accuracy of a plant-infection technique for counting populations of
R h i z o b i u m t r i] o l ii . Applied 3/licrobiol. 11, 377-383 (1963).
2 Da te , R. A. and Vin ee nt , J. M., Determination of the numb er of root-nodule
bacteria in the presenee of other organisms. Australian J. Exp. Agr. Animal Husband-
ry 2, 5-7 (1962).
3 Fi s h er , R. A. and Ya te s, F., Statistieal Tables for Biologieal, Agrieultural and
Medical Researeh. Oliver and Boyd, London (1953).
4 Gi bb on s, F. R. and Ha ll sw or th , E. G., Map of the soils of the Namoi Region.
I n The Namoi Region. A prelimi nary Sur vey of Resonrees . New South Wales
Premier s Dept. (1950).
5 Ha lv or se n, H. O. and Ziegl er, N. R., Applieation of statisties to problems in
bacteriology. I. A means of determining baeterial populations by the dilution
method . J. Baeteriol. 25, 101-121 (1933).
6 Hel y, F. W., Be rg er se n, F. J. and Br oe kw el l, J. , Mierobial antagonism in the
rhizosphere as a faetor in the failure of inoeulation oI subte rran ean elover. Australian
J. Agr. Research 8, 2 4 4 4 (1957).
7 Je ns e n, H. L., Nitrogen fixation in leguminous plants. I. General eharaeters of root
nodule baeteria isolated from speeies of M e d i c a g o and T r i I o l i u m in Australia. Proc.
Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 66, 98-108 (1942).
8 Le on ard , L. T., A simple assembl y for use in testing cultures of rhizobia. J. Baeteriol
4~
5 2 3 5 2 5 (1943).
9 M a r q u e z , R. G., Studies of the Root Nodule Bacteria. Thesis, M.Se. Agr., Univ.
Sydney (1956).
10 Pu re ha se , Hi la ry F. and Nu tm an , P. S., Studies of the physiology of nodnle
formation. VI. The influenee of bacterial numbers in the rhizosphere on nodnle
initiation. Ann. Botany 21,439-454 (1957).
11 Tu zi mu ra , K. and Wa ta na be , I. , Estimation of number of root-nodule baeteria
by a nodulation-dilution frequeney method. Eeologieal stndies of
R h i z o b i u m
in solls.
(Part I). Soff Sci. Plant Nutr. 7, 61-65 (1961).
12 Vi nc en t, J. M. and Cro ft s, F. C., Pasture improveme nt in the Pilliga. Rep. No. 3,
School of Agriculture, Univ. Sydney (1958).
13 Wi ls on , J . K., Legume baeteria popula tion of the soil. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 18,
9 1 1 - 9 1 9 1 9 2 6 ) .