RISOM2314

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    1/22

    RIS-M-2314

    QUALITY OF THE RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE IN

    PAPER RADIOGRAPHY

    J.C. Domanus and H.M. El Fouly

    Abstract. The quality of the radiographic image was investigated

    by the use of standard ISO wire Image Quality Indicators and

    ASTH Penetrameters. 10, 20, and 30 mm thick welds on alumunium

    and steel plates were radiographed using X-ray machines with vol

    tages from 35 to 300 kV. Agfa-Gevaert Structurix IC paper with

    Structurix IC screens Type II as well as Kodak Industrex 600 and

    620 and Rapid 700 paper with Fl and F2 screens were used through

    out the investigation. The results reached for radiographic paper

    were compared with those for a fast X-ray film (Kodak Industrex D ) .

    The results of the investigation were presented at the Inter

    national Conference Joining of Netals JOM-1 in Elsinore, Denmark

    (9-12.8.1981) and at the Second European Conference on Non

    destructive Testing in Vienna (14-16.9.1981).The texts of both

    papers are reproduced in this report. *

    INIS-descriptors; COMPARITIVE EVALUATIONS? IMAGES; INDUSTRIAL

    RADIOGRAPHY; INSPECTION; PAPER; PHOTOGRAPHIC FILMS; QUALITY CON

    TROL; WELDED JOINTS; X-RAY RADIOGRAPHY.

    UDC 6?0.179.15 : 537.531

    September 1981

    Ris National Laboratory, DK 4000 Roskilde, Denmark

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    2/22

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    3/22

    CONTENTS

    Pag

    RADIOGRAPHIC PAPER FOR THE QUALITY CONTROL OF

    JOINT STRUCTURES 5

    1. Introduction 5

    2.Radiographic paper 6

    3. Intensifying screens 6

    4.Radiographic material used for comparison 7

    5. Quality of the radiographic image 8

    6. Applications of paper radiography 8

    7.

    Conclusions 10

    References 11

    ISO WIRE IQI'S VS. ASTM PENETRAMETERS IN PAPER

    RADIOGRAPHY 13

    1. Introduction 13

    2.

    Experimental set-up 14

    3. Image quality indicators and penetrameters 14

    4.Radiographic image quality 14

    4.1. Aluminium 16

    4.2. Steel 17

    5. Conclusions 18

    References 21

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    4/22

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    5/22

    Tht

    ELSIItlE.Deaasrt

    AafMtt . -12 .1 IS1 1 1 C 7

    RADIOGRAPHIC PAPER FOR TIE QUALITY CONTROL OF JCOTT STRLr7JR3

    J.C. Dcmanus and M.H. El Fcuiy

    Nuclear Department

    Elsinore Shipbuilding ami Engineering Co.. Ltd.*)

    QK-aOOO Helsinges*. Denmark

    * Ra diatio n Science Department

    National Center for Research

    and

    Radiation Technology**}

    Cairo, Egypt

    Synopsis:Thepossibility ofusing radiographic paper

    insteadofX-ray film in theradiographic quality con

    trol ofmetal-joined structures aredescussed. Advan

    tages

    of

    this technique

    are

    presented: lower material,

    equipment, andlabor costs, shorter exposureandpro

    cessing tines,andeasier radiation protection. Results

    ofaninvestigationofradiographic image quality, per

    formed on different brands ofradiographic paperand

    compared with that of fast X-ray film, aregivenfor

    inspecting aluminium andsteel Joints. They verify that

    radiographic paper provides adequate quality formany

    applications of radiographic control of metal joint

    structures.

    Two

    examples

    are

    given

    o f

    such applications

    taken from nuclear technology: nuclear fuelandirradi

    ation cans.

    I. Introduction

    Itiscarmen practice to use radiography for the quality controlof

    joint structures.Forthat purpose X-ray filmsarecommonly used.To

    get radiographs

    of a

    high quality fine grain films are required which

    needarelatively long exposuresdue to theslow speedofsuch fiL-3.

    The processingofX-ray films requiresawet procedure which connected

    with thenecessary dryingof the wetfilms givesarattier long pro

    cessing time. X-ray machines used

    for

    radiography

    are

    al3c rather

    expensive, especially when fine grain X-ray films areused, which

    require relatively higher kilovcltages, creating inturn, mere diffi

    cult radiation protection prcfclems.Due tothat X-ray film radiography

    isarather time consumingandexpensive control tool.

    There are,however, possibilities to make X-ray radiography

    cheaper

    and

    faster

    if

    instead

    of

    X-ray film radiographic pacer

    w i n

    be used. The use of it presents thefollowing advantages: lower

    material cost (thepaper is 3 to 4 mescheaper than thefiLtw,

    ) Work performed under contract with Rise National Laboratory.

    *5Fellowship holier at Ri3 National Laboratory under theUnited

    Nations International Atomic Energy Agency Technical As3i3tar.ce

    Program.

    l-

    http://aafmtt.-12.1is1/http://aafmtt.-12.1is1/
  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    6/22

    - 6 -

    shorter exposure and processing tines, lighter and less expensive X-

    ray machines and easier radiation protection problems (as lower kilo-

    voltages for paper radiography are

    required).

    The use of radiographic

    paper for the quality control of Joint structures will be possible

    only then, when paper radiography will assure adequate quality cf the

    radiographic image. This has been investigated on aluninium and steel

    Joints and is reported below.

    II.Radiographic paper

    For radiographic papers a stabilization processing is used, which

    can in short be described in the following way. This is a method cf

    producing radiographs on paper much faster than is possible by con-

    vantional develop-stop-fix-wash processing. Exposed paper processed

    t, stabilization makes quality, ready-to-use radiographs available in

    seconds. These stabilized radiographs are net permanent because the

    chemical reactions within the emulsion have been stopped only tempo

    rarily. They will, however, last long enough to serve a number of

    practical purposes. In fact, stabilized radiographs often remain un

    changed for many months if they are no- xposed to strong light, high

    temperature, or excessive humidity.

    Stabilization processing is a machine operation in which radio

    graphs on paper are processed in about 10 seconds and leave the pro

    cesser in a slightly damp condition. They dry completely in a few

    minutes.

    The main differences between stabilization processing and

    ordinary radiographic processing are in the speed of activaticn

    (development) and in the method of treating the unexposed lightsen-

    3itive silver halide left in the emulsion after development. In con

    ventional processing, the unused 3ilver halide is dissolved by the

    fixer and any traces of soluble silver salts left after fixing are

    removed by subsequent washing. The rsulting radiographs are stable fcr

    long periods. In stabilization processing, however, the silver halide

    is converted to compounds which are only temporarily stable and the

    radiographs have a limited keeping time. However, stabilized radio

    graphs can be made permanent by fixing and washing after they have

    served their initial purpose.

    In papers designed for stabilization processing, developing

    agents are incorporated in the paper emulsion. Development is achieved

    by applying an alkaline activator to the emulsion surface. The sta

    bilizer is then applied to neutralise the activator and to convert any

    remaining silver haiide to relatively stable, colorless compounds.

    Figure 1, en the next page, shews a schematic diagram cf a paper

    processor. Further derails about the radiographic paper can be found in

    [i].

    III.

    Intensifying screens

    Because of the rather low response of radiographic paper to direct

    X-rays it must be used with fluorescent intensifying screens with

    -2-

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    7/22

    - 7 -

    which it shows a relatively higjt speed. One can profit by this his?.

    speed in two different ways: f ir st , the erasu re ti e s can be conside

    rably stxitaittd while keeping the saae kiicvoltage as for en X-ray

    f i le [2]- and second, to keep the exposure (atadn) constant and lower

    the kUcwoltaee [3].

    The first solution will undoubtedly lower the quality of the

    radiographic ioas due to the use of fluorescent intensifying screen.

    whereas in the second the radiographic contrast of the object to be

    radiographed w il l increase (due tc the lower kilov oltag e in use)

    the overall ojueity of the radiograph will be Maintained.

    A c t *

    S t a b i l l u r

    Fig.

    1.

    Schematic diagram

    of a

    paper processor.

    IV. Radiographic material used for comparison

    The following brandscf theradicgrphic paper were used: Agfa-

    Gevaert StructurlxICpaper withIC IIintensifying screensandKodak

    600,

    620 and 700

    paper with

    Fl and F2

    intensifying screens.

    The

    IC,

    60C and 620paper brands were processed inprocessersof thetype

    shewnon Fig.1,whereasthe 700paperwashand processed inregular

    X-ray film processing tanks (development

    45 s,

    fixing

    3

    min, washing

    10 min, drying10min).

    To compare thequality of theradiographic image enpaper with

    that

    on

    X-ray film

    the

    Kodak Industrex

    D

    (high speed)

    was

    used

    througout theinvestigation. It wasused with0.05 + 0.10 mmthick

    lead intensifying screens forkilcvcltages exceeding 50 kV.Further

    details about

    the

    comparison between paper

    and

    film radiography

    tan

    be foundin[4],

    -3-

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    8/22

    - 1 -

    V. Quality of the radiographic image

    Tb verif y the usefulness of the radiographic paper the qua lity

    of the radiographic image obtain ed on paper was tes te d and compared

    tilth that o f X-ray f i l . Standard image qu ality indic ators were

    utilised for that purpose.

    IX Mire KJTs were used to assess the quality of radiographs

    taken at di ffe re nt vo lta ges of 10 . 20 and X am thic k aluminium and

    st ee l pi *t es . The Al pl at es were radiographed at vo lta ges f ro s 35 t s

    SO kV, st ee l pl at es were radiographed at 125 to 300 kV. In e l l in

    stan ces radiographic qua lity or ZX or b ett er could be reached, which

    was in aeny i ns tan ces worse than tha t reached wit h the high speed D

    fila>. Throughout the investigation two types of X-ray aachines were

    used: a c onstan t po ten tia l 5-50 kV machine with a b er yl liu a window

    X-ray tu be, and above 50 kV two si ng le tank, eel f- re ct if ie d aachines

    (50-180 kV and 100-300 kV).

    The results of the image quality investigation can be summarized

    as follow s: For aluminium welds (on pla te s up to X an thick ) b est

    qu alit y can be reached when using the s o ft X-ray technique (b eryllium

    window X-ray tube). For a 10 tea Al plate a wire 101 percent image

    qu alit y of 1.25* could b e reached for most paper brands when usin g 35

    to 40 KV. whereas the Kodak Inou strex D fil m showed a IX qu al ity V

    the same region. For a 20 me Al pl at e a 1% se n si ti v it y could be

    reached fo r most of the paper-screen combinations a t 40 to 45 kV,

    whereas the D film could give a 0.8ft sen si ti vi ty . Fin ally , for a X

    ran Al plate a 0.67% sensitivity can be reached for paper at 45 to X

    kV and a 0.53ft s en si ti vi ty for the 0 fi lm .

    For st ee l welds kil ov olt ag es above 125 kV had to be used and con

    secutively no such good qualities were possible as with the soft

    X-rays (below X kV). Nev erthele ss, al so here paper radiographs of

    good quality could be produced. A

    2

    wire ICI quality can be reached

    with most of the paper-screen combinations at 125 to 175 kV. With the

    0 film at 125 kV a quality of 1.25ft i s po ssi ble . For a 20 mms tee l

    plate a quality of 1.25ft can be reached for paper at I X to 175 kV,

    whereas the D film i s only sli gt hl y be tter (1.0ft). F ina lly, at X m

    of s te e l the paper shows a good qu al ity of 1.33X and the D film 1.07%

    at kilovoltagss between 175 and 225 kV.

    Table 1 gives the res ults o f the image quality inve stiga tion ,

    where best results reached for different paper brands and the D film

    are shown.

    VI. Applications of paper radiography

    From the de scrip tion of the prop ertie s of the radiographic paper

    given above it appears that one will use radiographic paper in the

    followin g ins tan ces : i f the exposure time has to be shorten con

    sid era bly , i f i t i s necessary to obtain radiographs ready for

    assessment in a very short time, i f the case of proce ssing and cf

    evaluating the results cf radiography is of primary importance, if

    - 4 -

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    9/22

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    10/22

    - 18 -

    F ig . 2 . Paper radiograph o f a 1.5 an Al wsM . taken at S kV.

    VIZ. GcncluB&ona

    IT . diffe ren t uiterreeion el [f ] ans national C

    7

    . a. t ] standards

    r a i| i i i a m ara given regarding thereUaBBhic quality lawala. They

    ara d if fs m t fb r di ffe re nt radiographic tschniques. According to the

    O V M f f and I X /* . L If l 6 f b r

    -ray

    radiography two classes of X-ray

    aora sensitive technique, this corresponds to ma tue elaaaas given

    in DJJI 54 U1 0Q . The rup ih nir fb r class B given in ISO 250 []

    requires s 2ft wire S S q ua lity fb r s 10amweld, a 1.291 fb r 2C asj ane

    a 1.07% fb r X am. According to m e 0 0 t sta ns sU ma raojdraasnet

    fb r clas s A and I are m e fbUc Min g: fb r 10 am - 3.2 and 2-CSV. ft r X

    an - 2.0 and 1.29ft and fbr X

    m

    - 1-67 and 1-07 *. the general

    re i i i l r nr of the MtO/tSm {7. \ is that "the qual i ty level for

    radiography shall be as lease

    W .

    I f one M il l ccapars the above esnticned ra if ili a n e w ith the

    results rssched in the uieeam investigation and a

    UBL

    in Table

    1 , one w i l l cons to the eenciuslen m at the radiographic paper can

    e et the r eq ui iaja uu set out bom in the ISO as we ll as m e D2-:

    standards for class B (sore sensitiv technique) for aluajnlua wel^s

    up to X as thick and fo r stee l welds up to X as . I f , however, only

    m e class A (general technique) i s required men even a t X ae sf

    steel the radiographic papar can aset the above raquiroaents. A :x

    the AMSX/AS1M gen eral rsquirs sent about a t leas t

    2

    qual i ty leve l , i t

    has also bean proved (by the use of the ASM pam tranets rs) th at th is

    requiraaent can be est by the radiographic paper bom for Al and Ft

    up to X a.

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    11/22

    11 -

    IIIJ.C.

    mm lasere =te. m. *ia*m 1*77.

    "2

    ?-A. Ruauie: Lai poattn iiit K t u t U d ia

    Sm I* entroi

    ^ M

    je incs n e a t , jua i tcar ic a t tans i fi -

    t induatriftUai d U aiwftanatii*. raat Ouiiftwj

    ' W i l tfert D no utt iffc. K ed*. if * , p. iCC.

    C2T PJi. R ault : LA tse ht ia* rattajrajffcojtaL '**

    * * M Cbnfcranc* ifenslal* ur las Stoats san

    i f f . pap. X I .

    M J.C. D H M and C. Muaalam: GBaajriaan ef * -r w f i l andi

    ractaarajny. * H lttl . Ajril IfTl.

    [5] J.C. O M M nd P.A. fcault: Industrial ajplicattcni of

    jraahic aaaa*. ifcwrfalpiuftwt. a (1 *0 ) Mr. 3. U W 17 .

    0 1 1 .3 .0 . 250. laOimiEajH y of ualda an vturtng eanditiana for

    fUsa. UtiUsatton of i w M n M patterns of iaaja ** l i sy

    indicators (I.9.I.) l t n . 0 t . 0 1 .

    C7l MBI/JISSI EK-77. standard n u n m i era ctic* for

    Gil MBX/ASBf EKJ-77. Standard a n ted fcr csneraL iint * a l i t y of

    CI SOI 5 III. Zsr*tbnwpfr*i Ptiifvarfaivsn. PruAfff von

    wtroinduraan astaLLiaenar MKfestffa ait

    stranian. Jtuftahs* von Ourc^Btianiunaaiiidtrri

    http://ltn.0t.01/http://ltn.0t.01/
  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    12/22

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    13/22

    SECOND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON

    NON-DESTRUCTIVE-TESTING

    VIENNA

    14. -

    16. September 1981

    B-6

    ISO DRAHTSTEGE GEGEN ASTM PENETRAMETER

    IN DER PAPIERRADIOGRAPHIE

    ISOWIREIQI'S VS. ASTM PENETRAMETERS

    IN PAPER RADIOGRAPHY

    ISO INDICATEURS D'IMAGE A FIL S CONTRE ASTM PENETRAMETRES

    DANS LA RADIOGRAPHIE SUR PAPIER

    J.C.

    DOMANUS and H .M. El F ouly

    ls in o r e S h ip b u i ld in g & En g in e e r in g Co. L td . , De nma rk ')

    N ati on al Centre f or Researc h It Ra diat ion Technology , E gyp t ' )

    Beim Vergleich der verschiedenen Eigenschaften des radiographischen

    Papiers nit hochempfindlichen Rontgenfilm wurde dieBildgute von Al und

    Fe Schweissnahten (1 0, 20 und 30 on dick) mit H ilfe der ISO Drahtstege

    und ASTM Penetrometer un ter sucht. Die Bildgiite erreich t mit beide

    Methoden wurde verglichen.

    While comparing dif fe re nt pr op ert ies of radiographic paper with high

    speed X-ray f ilm , image qu ali ty of Al and Fe welds (10 , 20 and 30 mm

    thic k) was contro lled by the use of ISO wire image qu alit y ind icat ors

    and ASTM penetram eters. Radiographic s e n s it iv i t ie s reached by both

    methods were compared.

    Dans la comparaison des d if fe r n ts qu ali t s du papier radiographique

    avec c e ll e s du film , la qu ali t d' image des soudures sur plaques en

    Al et Fe (1 0, 20 et 30 mm pa is) et ai t compare a l'a id e des in dic a-

    teu rs d'imag e fi l s ISO et penetrametres ASTM. L es qu al it s d'image

    obtenus par les deux methodes furent compares.

    1.

    INTRODUCTION

    The pro per ties of the radiographic paper and i t s ap plic atio ns i n indu

    s tr ia l radiography have been extens ively investig ated at Ris before,

    and the results were published in Q., 2, 3]. In those investigations

    the qu alit y of the radiographic image on radiographic film and paper

    was compared by the u se of wire IQI's (for Al and Fe pl at es ) [ l , 2,

    3 ] ,

    by Al ste p wedges (fo r U/Al nuclear fuel p la te s) [1 , 2, 3] by

    sp ecia l made hole in dicat ors (for U/Al .loc ks , from which fuel pla tes

    are the reaf ter ro lle d down) QL, 2,

    S\

    and by stepped specimens (for

    reinforced composites) fl , 2,

    3,

    47. Also ar ti fi ci al and natural

    defects were used for that purpose 3J. While evaluating radiographic

    paper qu ali ty for ap pli cat ion s in the US Air Force, MIL-Standard 453

    penetrameters were used by H olloway and Eohlen [ 5 ] . The MIL pen etra

    meters are the same as describ ed in the ANSI/A3TM E 142-77 standard

    C6j.

    As a direct comparison of radiographic image quality for the radio

    graphic paper tes ted by the ISO wire 101* s [7] and the penetrameters

    could not be found in the current literature it was decided to perform

    such a comparison using 10 , 20 and 30 mm welds on aluminium and steel

    plates. Results of this comparison are described below.

    Work performed under contract with Ris National Laboratory.

    *) Fellowship holderatRis National Laboratory undertheUnited

    Nations International Atomic Technical Assistance Program.

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    14/22

    - 14 -

    2.

    DPERSEfTAL SET-UP

    The radiographic quality was investigated using weldsonaluminium and

    steel plates (10,20 and 30 itmthick).Cneach plateasuitable wire

    Id's

    and

    penetrameters were placed.The radiographs were then assessed

    by three observers

    and

    only smallest wires

    and

    holes seen

    by all the

    three observers .were taken into consideration.

    The plates were radiographed usingaconstant potential 50 kV(with

    beryllium window X-ray tube)and a 180self ectified, unit-tank X-ray

    machines.For thefirst voltages from 35 to 50 kVwere used whereas

    the later

    was

    operated between

    50 and I X kV.

    Similar steel plates

    were radiographed

    by a

    300

    kV

    self ectified, unit-tank machine

    at

    vol

    tages from

    125 to

    300

    kV.

    Following brands cf radiographic paper andfluorescent intensifying

    screens were used: Kodak Industrex 600 and 620 aswellasRapid70C

    paper (allwith Fl and F2 screens)andAgfa-Gev r? StructurixIC

    paper withICtypeIIscreen. For comparison with X-ray film the Kodak

    Industrex

    0

    film

    w as

    used.

    For

    kilovoltages

    up to 50 kV (the 50 kV

    machine)

    it

    was used without intensifying screens whereas

    for

    voltages

    above5C kV (the ISO and 300 kVmachines) lead 0.05+0.10mmscreens

    were used.The 50 kVmachinehad a 0.5 mmfocus whereasthe 180 and

    300kVmachineshad 2.3 and 4.0 mnfoci.Allexposures were madeat

    ImFFO.

    3 . IMAGE CUALJTV BCICATCRS AM) PBTRAMETZRS

    The relative merits

    and

    disadvantages

    of

    use

    of the

    ISO wire IQI's

    and

    the ASTM penetrameterscan besummarized asfollows:T hewire IQI's

    are mere universal

    in

    use,

    a s for

    practically

    all

    thicknesses

    cf the

    examined object thesameset ofthree IOI'scan beused.Ife.g.the

    DIN

    54 109

    IOI's are used, containing

    16

    different wires, grouped into

    .three set3 (1/7, 6/12,

    1 0 / 1 6 ) ,

    then therange of wire diameters

    strecnes from

    0.1 to 3.2 mn .

    This means that

    e.g. for

    objects with

    thicknesses from

    10 to 320 mm a

    1

    radiographic sensitivity car.

    be

    checked.

    Cn the

    contrary, with

    the

    ASTM penetrameters

    fcr

    each thicx-

    nasatf theobject under controlaseparateset cfthree penetrameters

    is required inprinciple (astheir thiciciesses shallbe I, 2 and 4 %

    oftheobject thickress).TheASTM penetrameters presentanadvantage

    when thepenetrameter sensitivity iscalculated. Hereforeach pene-

    trareter constant values ofsensitivityare set by itsconstant per

    cent thickness andconstant relaticno f itshole diameters tothis

    thickness.

    On the

    contrary

    the ISO

    wire IQI's will give different

    101

    sensitivities fcr thesame visible wire, depending cn thethickness

    of

    the

    examined object.

    The

    differences between

    the ISO ans

    ASTM

    sy

    stemscan betest illustratedby thefollowing exarple takenfcr IC,

    20

    and 3C mm

    thick plates,

    as

    used thrcughcut this investigation.

    4.

    RAT.:0GPAFH1C IMAGE QUALITY

    As mentioned before a d ir ec t comparison was Tade of radiogra phic irag e

    qu ali ty obtain ed by the use of the ISO wire I d ' s and the ASTM pen e

    t r a n t *r3 fc r v ariou s brands of radiographic paper and a high speed

    X-ray f i lm . The re su lt s ther eof are presented in the follow ing si x

    diagrams.

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    15/22

    I P late

    1 t h i c k

    n e s s

    t

    1U

    SO

    3 0

    Percent IQ1 se n si ti v i t y (by the ISO method).

    Minimum vi si b le DIN wire diam eter on a p la te of t mm

    Wire No.

    1 1 ? I 3 1 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 1 9 | 10 1 11

    Wire diam eter - mm

    3 . 2 0

    lb

    10.67

    2 . 5 0

    ;?.5

    U.33

    2.00

    2 0

    10

    b.67

    1.60

    16

    a

    5 . 3 3

    1.25

    12.5

    b.2ft

    4 .17

    1.00

    10.0

    5

    3 . 3 3

    0 . 0 0

    8 . 0

    4

    2 .67

    0 . 6 3

    6 . 3

    3 .15

    2 .10

    0 . 5 0

    5 . 0

    2 . 5

    1.67

    0 . 4 0

    4 . 0

    2 .0

    1.33

    0 . 3 2

    3 . 2

    1.6

    1.07

    12

    0 . 2 5

    2 . 5

    1.25

    0 . 8 3

    13

    0 . 2 0

    2 . 0

    1.0

    0 .67

    14 | 15 | 16

    0 .16

    1.60

    0 .8

    0 . 5 3

    0 .125

    1.25

    0 .63

    0 .42

    o ino

    i.no

    0 . 5 0

    0 . 3 3

    fc IO r-

    u * ro

    (J> O 00

    * . *>

    1 1 1

    it 3 5

    t

    2

    8

    i

    3

    rv>

    2

    0

    i

    3

    M

    1

    4

    1

    4 -

    1

    4

    1

    3

    -

    N> t->

    b Vi

    1 1

    S J3

    * IIS

    T -C,

    U r- O* J n

    j i 3

    E

    v

    e

    n

    p

    n

    r

    r

    n

    e

    s

    n

    -

    t

    v

    y

    A

    r-

    1

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    16/22

    - 16 -

    Fig . l . Image qu alit y for 10 mm Al.

    4 . 1 .

    AluTiniun

    For

    the

    thinnest

    Al

    plate

    (10

    mm) wire

    IQI

    sensitivities

    are

    always

    better

    for the

    high speed film than

    for

    paper. Only

    one

    paper/screen

    combination (620/F2) could once

    (at 35 kV)

    give

    the

    same results

    1%)as thefilm.Thefilm isalso less sensitivetothe voltagein

    crease than paper.The 1%sensitivity reached with the wireIQIcould

    nevertereached with theASTM penetrametar, which 3hcwed thetest

    level

    of 2-lT

    (1.40) both for

    D

    film

    and the

    7CC/FI paper ccn*irati:n.

    Nevertheless, the 20sensitivity caneasily bereached forfilmor

    pacer bothfor thewireIQI aswellas theASTM ?enetrareter3ifcor

    rect (Low) kilovoltageischosen.

    For the 20 rnnplate equally good results couldbeobtained 'forthe

    D filmandIC/ICIIpacer combination fcr wire IQI'3 'butatsligh-'iy

    different vol -g*s: ~5Cand 45 kVrespectively). Also

    te n

    thepresent

    ASTM sensitiv*/ wasworse than that reached with ISC' wires, although

    the2-IT level (1.4%) ccuid be reached forseveral paper/reen

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    17/22

    - 17 -

    kV

    :S0

    iQt

    O

    I 'C I

    600

    ZQrrwi Al

    620

    700

    ASTM

    ptfWtra -

    Nr.

    %

    iCII

    F1

    j c m

    F2 I P1 I F2 i Fl

    F2

    CM l l ii l iF n i i i ll l H L i i i^ B i ^ i i r B l 'O i i i B l J ^ i i l B a ^ i i lE ' j l L jy :

    f l l l i l l .

    LM

    Fig.2.Image qualityfor 20 mmAl.

    combinations.

    AtX nm the Dfilm wasbyone wire better thananypaper/screen com

    bination

    at any

    kilovoltage. Also here

    the 2-lT

    level (1.4%) could

    be reachedforseveral paper/screen combinations.

    In generalthe 2-2Tlevel (2)caneasilybereachedforallAlplates

    and paper/screen combinations. Thisisalso truefor the2 wire sen

    sitivity.

    The ASTM penetrameter sensitivity

    was

    also investigated

    for a

    larger

    rangeof Althictaesses (3.18to88.90 mm) withaconstant potential

    X-ray machine (45 to 160 KV) byHollcway and issutmarily reported

    in [7J, whereas [8] gives full details.

    4.2. Steel

    FortneinvestigationofsteelaseLfrectified X-ray machine was used.

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    18/22

    - 13 -

    70

    tr-,

    yililiiyiiiii iii

    | . T T

    ;

    ^ f

    l -JT

    Fig.3.linage qualityfor X ion Al.

    At 10

    am

    only the

    D

    film could give

    the

    1.25ftwire sensitivity, where

    as

    the 2-2T

    penetraneter level (2 )could

    be

    reached with several

    paper/screen combinationsatdifferent kilcvoltage.Itcould, however,

    notbereachedenthe0film.

    At-20 mm the0.3* wire sensitivity cculdbereachedat I X hVboth

    f?r

    'ha D

    film

    as

    well

    as the

    700/F2 paper.

    The

    same was true

    fcr th*

    2-17 level (1.4ft),whereas

    the 2-2T

    level

    (2%)

    cculd

    be

    reached

    by

    almostallpaper/screen combinations.

    AtX aw the Dfilm showsthebest wire sensitivir/(I.(77ft),whereas

    equal penetrameter2-ITlevel (I.**) canberead-ad bcthfor thefilm

    and paper.

    Unfortunately, no such comparative investigation cf radiographic

    quality fcr paper

    and

    steel cculd

    be

    fcund

    in

    the literature.

    5. CCgCLU5IC?g

    *niie ccqparing

    :ne

    results

    of

    radiographic inage quality investig

    ations performed with

    the ISC

    wire ICI's

    and

    AS7M perstraneters

    Che

    following conclusions

    can be

    irawn:

    1)

    The

    ASTM penetrametr level

    l-l?

    (0.7S) cculd never

    be

    reached,

    neither withthefilm hor withthepaper.

    2)The 1-2TIr/el (1.0JS) cculdbe:nly exceptionally reachedandcr.ly

    ii r the Dfilm (JC sinAi at 50 /).

    3)In most instances reachingthe 2-1?level (l.-%)ispossible both

    for filmandpaper.

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    19/22

    -

    19 -

    i

    3

    kV

    T25

    15C

    175

    200

    225

    250

    275

    300

    ISO

    IQI

    N t

    nrr

    m m

    F>

    600

    620

    700

    S KH

    aeati ICH I Fl | F2 1 F1 I F2

    ASTM

    psnctro-

    mttir

    ltvl

    4

    F o r t h e

    t i v i t y

    F i g . 4 . I m a g e q u a l i t y f o r 1 0mmF e .

    s a m e f i l a i

    or

    p a p e r b r a n d t h e a b s o l u t e w i r e p e r c e n t s e n s i-

    a L w a y s b e t t e r t h a n t h a t f s r t n e p e n e t r a m e t e r .

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    20/22

    - 20

    Fig. 5. Image quality for 20 mm Fe.

    5) This mean thar it is easier to detect a wire of the same diameter

    as a hole in a penetrameter. This difference is more visible for

    the paper than film.

    6) From the above investigation no definitive conclusion can be drawn

    about the superiority of any brand of the radiographic paper.

    7) The same is true when one compares the use of the Kodak Fl and F2

    screens with different brar.d3 of the Kodak paper.

    8)

    ,-.}

    a general conclusion it can be said that it is easier to assess

    the radiographic image quality of the radiographic paper with the

    ISO wire IOI's than the ASTM penetrometers.

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    21/22

    - 21 -

    Fig. 6. Image quality for 30 nm Fe.

    REFERENCES

    J.C. Dcmanus, Industrial radiography on radiographic paper.

    Rise Report Mo. 371. November 1977.

    J.C. Dcmanus and C. Mikkelsen, Comparison of X-ray film and paper

    radiography. Ris-M-1995. April 1978 and Proceedings of the First

    European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing. Mainz, 24-26.4.

    1978.67/593-601.

    J.C. Dcmanus and P.A. Ruault, Industrial application of radio

    graphic paper. Materiaipriifung 22

    1 9 8 0 ) ,

    Nr. 3, 111-17.

    J.C. Dcmanus and H. Lilholt, Non-destructive control of carbon

    fibre reinforced composites by soft X-ray radiography. Rise-M-

    1979.

    January 1978 and Proceedings of the 1978 International Con

    ference on Composite Materials. 16-20.4.1978, Toronto, Canada,

    1072-1C92.

    J.A. HLicway and J.W. Sohlen, Air Force evaluation of Industrex

    Instant 300 radiographic paper system. Materials Evaluation,

    April 1977, 39-45.

    ANSI/ASTM E 142-77. Standard method for controlling quality of

    radiographic testing.

    ISC Recommendation R 1C27. Radiographic image quality indicators.

    Principles and identification.

    J.A. Hollcway and T.R. Henderson, Evaluation of a radiographic

    paper system using ultraviolet fluorescent screens. AFML-TR-72-

    165.Part I and II. March L975.

  • 8/10/2019 RISOM2314

    22/22

    Ris National L aboratory

    Ris-M-GZiD

    Title and author(s)

    Q u a l i t y o f t h e r a d i o g r a p h i c i m a ge

    i n p a p e r r a d i o g r a p h y

    J . C . Domanus and H . M. E l F ou ly

    Group's own registration

    number(s)

    21 P*gs + 3 tab les + i l lu s t r a t i on s

    >*

    S e p t e m b e r 1 9 8 1

    Department or group

    M e t a l l u r g y

    Abstract

    The quality of the radiographic image was inve

    stigated by the use of standard ISO wire Image

    Quality Indicators and ASTM Penetrameters. 10,

    20,

    and 30 mm thick welds on aluminium and

    steel plates were radiographed using X-ray

    machines with voltages from 35 to 300 kV. Agfa-

    Gevaert Structurix IC paper with Structurix IC

    screens Type II as well as Kodak Industrex 600

    and 620 and Rapid 700 paper with Fl and F2

    screens were used throughout the investigation.

    The results reached for radiographic paper were

    compared with those for a fast X-ray film (Kodak

    Industrex

    D) .

    The results of the investigation

    were presented at the International Conference

    Joining of Metals JOM-1 in Elsinore, Denmark

    (9-12.8.1981) and at the Second European Confe

    rence on Non-Destructive Testing in Vienna

    (14-16.9.1981).The texts of both papers are

    reproduced in this report.

    Copies

    to

    Available

    on

    request from Ris Library, Ris National

    Laboratory (RisBibliotek),Porsgsanls?Ris),

    DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark

    Telephone: (03) 37 12 12 , ext.2262.Telexs43116