Upload
sanjay-kumar-singh
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
1/22
RIS-M-2314
QUALITY OF THE RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE IN
PAPER RADIOGRAPHY
J.C. Domanus and H.M. El Fouly
Abstract. The quality of the radiographic image was investigated
by the use of standard ISO wire Image Quality Indicators and
ASTH Penetrameters. 10, 20, and 30 mm thick welds on alumunium
and steel plates were radiographed using X-ray machines with vol
tages from 35 to 300 kV. Agfa-Gevaert Structurix IC paper with
Structurix IC screens Type II as well as Kodak Industrex 600 and
620 and Rapid 700 paper with Fl and F2 screens were used through
out the investigation. The results reached for radiographic paper
were compared with those for a fast X-ray film (Kodak Industrex D ) .
The results of the investigation were presented at the Inter
national Conference Joining of Netals JOM-1 in Elsinore, Denmark
(9-12.8.1981) and at the Second European Conference on Non
destructive Testing in Vienna (14-16.9.1981).The texts of both
papers are reproduced in this report. *
INIS-descriptors; COMPARITIVE EVALUATIONS? IMAGES; INDUSTRIAL
RADIOGRAPHY; INSPECTION; PAPER; PHOTOGRAPHIC FILMS; QUALITY CON
TROL; WELDED JOINTS; X-RAY RADIOGRAPHY.
UDC 6?0.179.15 : 537.531
September 1981
Ris National Laboratory, DK 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
2/22
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
3/22
CONTENTS
Pag
RADIOGRAPHIC PAPER FOR THE QUALITY CONTROL OF
JOINT STRUCTURES 5
1. Introduction 5
2.Radiographic paper 6
3. Intensifying screens 6
4.Radiographic material used for comparison 7
5. Quality of the radiographic image 8
6. Applications of paper radiography 8
7.
Conclusions 10
References 11
ISO WIRE IQI'S VS. ASTM PENETRAMETERS IN PAPER
RADIOGRAPHY 13
1. Introduction 13
2.
Experimental set-up 14
3. Image quality indicators and penetrameters 14
4.Radiographic image quality 14
4.1. Aluminium 16
4.2. Steel 17
5. Conclusions 18
References 21
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
4/22
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
5/22
Tht
ELSIItlE.Deaasrt
AafMtt . -12 .1 IS1 1 1 C 7
RADIOGRAPHIC PAPER FOR TIE QUALITY CONTROL OF JCOTT STRLr7JR3
J.C. Dcmanus and M.H. El Fcuiy
Nuclear Department
Elsinore Shipbuilding ami Engineering Co.. Ltd.*)
QK-aOOO Helsinges*. Denmark
* Ra diatio n Science Department
National Center for Research
and
Radiation Technology**}
Cairo, Egypt
Synopsis:Thepossibility ofusing radiographic paper
insteadofX-ray film in theradiographic quality con
trol ofmetal-joined structures aredescussed. Advan
tages
of
this technique
are
presented: lower material,
equipment, andlabor costs, shorter exposureandpro
cessing tines,andeasier radiation protection. Results
ofaninvestigationofradiographic image quality, per
formed on different brands ofradiographic paperand
compared with that of fast X-ray film, aregivenfor
inspecting aluminium andsteel Joints. They verify that
radiographic paper provides adequate quality formany
applications of radiographic control of metal joint
structures.
Two
examples
are
given
o f
such applications
taken from nuclear technology: nuclear fuelandirradi
ation cans.
I. Introduction
Itiscarmen practice to use radiography for the quality controlof
joint structures.Forthat purpose X-ray filmsarecommonly used.To
get radiographs
of a
high quality fine grain films are required which
needarelatively long exposuresdue to theslow speedofsuch fiL-3.
The processingofX-ray films requiresawet procedure which connected
with thenecessary dryingof the wetfilms givesarattier long pro
cessing time. X-ray machines used
for
radiography
are
al3c rather
expensive, especially when fine grain X-ray films areused, which
require relatively higher kilovcltages, creating inturn, mere diffi
cult radiation protection prcfclems.Due tothat X-ray film radiography
isarather time consumingandexpensive control tool.
There are,however, possibilities to make X-ray radiography
cheaper
and
faster
if
instead
of
X-ray film radiographic pacer
w i n
be used. The use of it presents thefollowing advantages: lower
material cost (thepaper is 3 to 4 mescheaper than thefiLtw,
) Work performed under contract with Rise National Laboratory.
*5Fellowship holier at Ri3 National Laboratory under theUnited
Nations International Atomic Energy Agency Technical As3i3tar.ce
Program.
l-
http://aafmtt.-12.1is1/http://aafmtt.-12.1is1/8/10/2019 RISOM2314
6/22
- 6 -
shorter exposure and processing tines, lighter and less expensive X-
ray machines and easier radiation protection problems (as lower kilo-
voltages for paper radiography are
required).
The use of radiographic
paper for the quality control of Joint structures will be possible
only then, when paper radiography will assure adequate quality cf the
radiographic image. This has been investigated on aluninium and steel
Joints and is reported below.
II.Radiographic paper
For radiographic papers a stabilization processing is used, which
can in short be described in the following way. This is a method cf
producing radiographs on paper much faster than is possible by con-
vantional develop-stop-fix-wash processing. Exposed paper processed
t, stabilization makes quality, ready-to-use radiographs available in
seconds. These stabilized radiographs are net permanent because the
chemical reactions within the emulsion have been stopped only tempo
rarily. They will, however, last long enough to serve a number of
practical purposes. In fact, stabilized radiographs often remain un
changed for many months if they are no- xposed to strong light, high
temperature, or excessive humidity.
Stabilization processing is a machine operation in which radio
graphs on paper are processed in about 10 seconds and leave the pro
cesser in a slightly damp condition. They dry completely in a few
minutes.
The main differences between stabilization processing and
ordinary radiographic processing are in the speed of activaticn
(development) and in the method of treating the unexposed lightsen-
3itive silver halide left in the emulsion after development. In con
ventional processing, the unused 3ilver halide is dissolved by the
fixer and any traces of soluble silver salts left after fixing are
removed by subsequent washing. The rsulting radiographs are stable fcr
long periods. In stabilization processing, however, the silver halide
is converted to compounds which are only temporarily stable and the
radiographs have a limited keeping time. However, stabilized radio
graphs can be made permanent by fixing and washing after they have
served their initial purpose.
In papers designed for stabilization processing, developing
agents are incorporated in the paper emulsion. Development is achieved
by applying an alkaline activator to the emulsion surface. The sta
bilizer is then applied to neutralise the activator and to convert any
remaining silver haiide to relatively stable, colorless compounds.
Figure 1, en the next page, shews a schematic diagram cf a paper
processor. Further derails about the radiographic paper can be found in
[i].
III.
Intensifying screens
Because of the rather low response of radiographic paper to direct
X-rays it must be used with fluorescent intensifying screens with
-2-
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
7/22
- 7 -
which it shows a relatively higjt speed. One can profit by this his?.
speed in two different ways: f ir st , the erasu re ti e s can be conside
rably stxitaittd while keeping the saae kiicvoltage as for en X-ray
f i le [2]- and second, to keep the exposure (atadn) constant and lower
the kUcwoltaee [3].
The first solution will undoubtedly lower the quality of the
radiographic ioas due to the use of fluorescent intensifying screen.
whereas in the second the radiographic contrast of the object to be
radiographed w il l increase (due tc the lower kilov oltag e in use)
the overall ojueity of the radiograph will be Maintained.
A c t *
S t a b i l l u r
Fig.
1.
Schematic diagram
of a
paper processor.
IV. Radiographic material used for comparison
The following brandscf theradicgrphic paper were used: Agfa-
Gevaert StructurlxICpaper withIC IIintensifying screensandKodak
600,
620 and 700
paper with
Fl and F2
intensifying screens.
The
IC,
60C and 620paper brands were processed inprocessersof thetype
shewnon Fig.1,whereasthe 700paperwashand processed inregular
X-ray film processing tanks (development
45 s,
fixing
3
min, washing
10 min, drying10min).
To compare thequality of theradiographic image enpaper with
that
on
X-ray film
the
Kodak Industrex
D
(high speed)
was
used
througout theinvestigation. It wasused with0.05 + 0.10 mmthick
lead intensifying screens forkilcvcltages exceeding 50 kV.Further
details about
the
comparison between paper
and
film radiography
tan
be foundin[4],
-3-
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
8/22
- 1 -
V. Quality of the radiographic image
Tb verif y the usefulness of the radiographic paper the qua lity
of the radiographic image obtain ed on paper was tes te d and compared
tilth that o f X-ray f i l . Standard image qu ality indic ators were
utilised for that purpose.
IX Mire KJTs were used to assess the quality of radiographs
taken at di ffe re nt vo lta ges of 10 . 20 and X am thic k aluminium and
st ee l pi *t es . The Al pl at es were radiographed at vo lta ges f ro s 35 t s
SO kV, st ee l pl at es were radiographed at 125 to 300 kV. In e l l in
stan ces radiographic qua lity or ZX or b ett er could be reached, which
was in aeny i ns tan ces worse than tha t reached wit h the high speed D
fila>. Throughout the investigation two types of X-ray aachines were
used: a c onstan t po ten tia l 5-50 kV machine with a b er yl liu a window
X-ray tu be, and above 50 kV two si ng le tank, eel f- re ct if ie d aachines
(50-180 kV and 100-300 kV).
The results of the image quality investigation can be summarized
as follow s: For aluminium welds (on pla te s up to X an thick ) b est
qu alit y can be reached when using the s o ft X-ray technique (b eryllium
window X-ray tube). For a 10 tea Al plate a wire 101 percent image
qu alit y of 1.25* could b e reached for most paper brands when usin g 35
to 40 KV. whereas the Kodak Inou strex D fil m showed a IX qu al ity V
the same region. For a 20 me Al pl at e a 1% se n si ti v it y could be
reached fo r most of the paper-screen combinations a t 40 to 45 kV,
whereas the D film could give a 0.8ft sen si ti vi ty . Fin ally , for a X
ran Al plate a 0.67% sensitivity can be reached for paper at 45 to X
kV and a 0.53ft s en si ti vi ty for the 0 fi lm .
For st ee l welds kil ov olt ag es above 125 kV had to be used and con
secutively no such good qualities were possible as with the soft
X-rays (below X kV). Nev erthele ss, al so here paper radiographs of
good quality could be produced. A
2
wire ICI quality can be reached
with most of the paper-screen combinations at 125 to 175 kV. With the
0 film at 125 kV a quality of 1.25ft i s po ssi ble . For a 20 mms tee l
plate a quality of 1.25ft can be reached for paper at I X to 175 kV,
whereas the D film i s only sli gt hl y be tter (1.0ft). F ina lly, at X m
of s te e l the paper shows a good qu al ity of 1.33X and the D film 1.07%
at kilovoltagss between 175 and 225 kV.
Table 1 gives the res ults o f the image quality inve stiga tion ,
where best results reached for different paper brands and the D film
are shown.
VI. Applications of paper radiography
From the de scrip tion of the prop ertie s of the radiographic paper
given above it appears that one will use radiographic paper in the
followin g ins tan ces : i f the exposure time has to be shorten con
sid era bly , i f i t i s necessary to obtain radiographs ready for
assessment in a very short time, i f the case of proce ssing and cf
evaluating the results cf radiography is of primary importance, if
- 4 -
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
9/22
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
10/22
- 18 -
F ig . 2 . Paper radiograph o f a 1.5 an Al wsM . taken at S kV.
VIZ. GcncluB&ona
IT . diffe ren t uiterreeion el [f ] ans national C
7
. a. t ] standards
r a i| i i i a m ara given regarding thereUaBBhic quality lawala. They
ara d if fs m t fb r di ffe re nt radiographic tschniques. According to the
O V M f f and I X /* . L If l 6 f b r
-ray
radiography two classes of X-ray
aora sensitive technique, this corresponds to ma tue elaaaas given
in DJJI 54 U1 0Q . The rup ih nir fb r class B given in ISO 250 []
requires s 2ft wire S S q ua lity fb r s 10amweld, a 1.291 fb r 2C asj ane
a 1.07% fb r X am. According to m e 0 0 t sta ns sU ma raojdraasnet
fb r clas s A and I are m e fbUc Min g: fb r 10 am - 3.2 and 2-CSV. ft r X
an - 2.0 and 1.29ft and fbr X
m
- 1-67 and 1-07 *. the general
re i i i l r nr of the MtO/tSm {7. \ is that "the qual i ty level for
radiography shall be as lease
W .
I f one M il l ccapars the above esnticned ra if ili a n e w ith the
results rssched in the uieeam investigation and a
UBL
in Table
1 , one w i l l cons to the eenciuslen m at the radiographic paper can
e et the r eq ui iaja uu set out bom in the ISO as we ll as m e D2-:
standards for class B (sore sensitiv technique) for aluajnlua wel^s
up to X as thick and fo r stee l welds up to X as . I f , however, only
m e class A (general technique) i s required men even a t X ae sf
steel the radiographic papar can aset the above raquiroaents. A :x
the AMSX/AS1M gen eral rsquirs sent about a t leas t
2
qual i ty leve l , i t
has also bean proved (by the use of the ASM pam tranets rs) th at th is
requiraaent can be est by the radiographic paper bom for Al and Ft
up to X a.
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
11/22
11 -
IIIJ.C.
mm lasere =te. m. *ia*m 1*77.
"2
?-A. Ruauie: Lai poattn iiit K t u t U d ia
Sm I* entroi
^ M
je incs n e a t , jua i tcar ic a t tans i fi -
t induatriftUai d U aiwftanatii*. raat Ouiiftwj
' W i l tfert D no utt iffc. K ed*. if * , p. iCC.
C2T PJi. R ault : LA tse ht ia* rattajrajffcojtaL '**
* * M Cbnfcranc* ifenslal* ur las Stoats san
i f f . pap. X I .
M J.C. D H M and C. Muaalam: GBaajriaan ef * -r w f i l andi
ractaarajny. * H lttl . Ajril IfTl.
[5] J.C. O M M nd P.A. fcault: Industrial ajplicattcni of
jraahic aaaa*. ifcwrfalpiuftwt. a (1 *0 ) Mr. 3. U W 17 .
0 1 1 .3 .0 . 250. laOimiEajH y of ualda an vturtng eanditiana for
fUsa. UtiUsatton of i w M n M patterns of iaaja ** l i sy
indicators (I.9.I.) l t n . 0 t . 0 1 .
C7l MBI/JISSI EK-77. standard n u n m i era ctic* for
Gil MBX/ASBf EKJ-77. Standard a n ted fcr csneraL iint * a l i t y of
CI SOI 5 III. Zsr*tbnwpfr*i Ptiifvarfaivsn. PruAfff von
wtroinduraan astaLLiaenar MKfestffa ait
stranian. Jtuftahs* von Ourc^Btianiunaaiiidtrri
http://ltn.0t.01/http://ltn.0t.01/8/10/2019 RISOM2314
12/22
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
13/22
SECOND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON
NON-DESTRUCTIVE-TESTING
VIENNA
14. -
16. September 1981
B-6
ISO DRAHTSTEGE GEGEN ASTM PENETRAMETER
IN DER PAPIERRADIOGRAPHIE
ISOWIREIQI'S VS. ASTM PENETRAMETERS
IN PAPER RADIOGRAPHY
ISO INDICATEURS D'IMAGE A FIL S CONTRE ASTM PENETRAMETRES
DANS LA RADIOGRAPHIE SUR PAPIER
J.C.
DOMANUS and H .M. El F ouly
ls in o r e S h ip b u i ld in g & En g in e e r in g Co. L td . , De nma rk ')
N ati on al Centre f or Researc h It Ra diat ion Technology , E gyp t ' )
Beim Vergleich der verschiedenen Eigenschaften des radiographischen
Papiers nit hochempfindlichen Rontgenfilm wurde dieBildgute von Al und
Fe Schweissnahten (1 0, 20 und 30 on dick) mit H ilfe der ISO Drahtstege
und ASTM Penetrometer un ter sucht. Die Bildgiite erreich t mit beide
Methoden wurde verglichen.
While comparing dif fe re nt pr op ert ies of radiographic paper with high
speed X-ray f ilm , image qu ali ty of Al and Fe welds (10 , 20 and 30 mm
thic k) was contro lled by the use of ISO wire image qu alit y ind icat ors
and ASTM penetram eters. Radiographic s e n s it iv i t ie s reached by both
methods were compared.
Dans la comparaison des d if fe r n ts qu ali t s du papier radiographique
avec c e ll e s du film , la qu ali t d' image des soudures sur plaques en
Al et Fe (1 0, 20 et 30 mm pa is) et ai t compare a l'a id e des in dic a-
teu rs d'imag e fi l s ISO et penetrametres ASTM. L es qu al it s d'image
obtenus par les deux methodes furent compares.
1.
INTRODUCTION
The pro per ties of the radiographic paper and i t s ap plic atio ns i n indu
s tr ia l radiography have been extens ively investig ated at Ris before,
and the results were published in Q., 2, 3]. In those investigations
the qu alit y of the radiographic image on radiographic film and paper
was compared by the u se of wire IQI's (for Al and Fe pl at es ) [ l , 2,
3 ] ,
by Al ste p wedges (fo r U/Al nuclear fuel p la te s) [1 , 2, 3] by
sp ecia l made hole in dicat ors (for U/Al .loc ks , from which fuel pla tes
are the reaf ter ro lle d down) QL, 2,
S\
and by stepped specimens (for
reinforced composites) fl , 2,
3,
47. Also ar ti fi ci al and natural
defects were used for that purpose 3J. While evaluating radiographic
paper qu ali ty for ap pli cat ion s in the US Air Force, MIL-Standard 453
penetrameters were used by H olloway and Eohlen [ 5 ] . The MIL pen etra
meters are the same as describ ed in the ANSI/A3TM E 142-77 standard
C6j.
As a direct comparison of radiographic image quality for the radio
graphic paper tes ted by the ISO wire 101* s [7] and the penetrameters
could not be found in the current literature it was decided to perform
such a comparison using 10 , 20 and 30 mm welds on aluminium and steel
plates. Results of this comparison are described below.
Work performed under contract with Ris National Laboratory.
*) Fellowship holderatRis National Laboratory undertheUnited
Nations International Atomic Technical Assistance Program.
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
14/22
- 14 -
2.
DPERSEfTAL SET-UP
The radiographic quality was investigated using weldsonaluminium and
steel plates (10,20 and 30 itmthick).Cneach plateasuitable wire
Id's
and
penetrameters were placed.The radiographs were then assessed
by three observers
and
only smallest wires
and
holes seen
by all the
three observers .were taken into consideration.
The plates were radiographed usingaconstant potential 50 kV(with
beryllium window X-ray tube)and a 180self ectified, unit-tank X-ray
machines.For thefirst voltages from 35 to 50 kVwere used whereas
the later
was
operated between
50 and I X kV.
Similar steel plates
were radiographed
by a
300
kV
self ectified, unit-tank machine
at
vol
tages from
125 to
300
kV.
Following brands cf radiographic paper andfluorescent intensifying
screens were used: Kodak Industrex 600 and 620 aswellasRapid70C
paper (allwith Fl and F2 screens)andAgfa-Gev r? StructurixIC
paper withICtypeIIscreen. For comparison with X-ray film the Kodak
Industrex
0
film
w as
used.
For
kilovoltages
up to 50 kV (the 50 kV
machine)
it
was used without intensifying screens whereas
for
voltages
above5C kV (the ISO and 300 kVmachines) lead 0.05+0.10mmscreens
were used.The 50 kVmachinehad a 0.5 mmfocus whereasthe 180 and
300kVmachineshad 2.3 and 4.0 mnfoci.Allexposures were madeat
ImFFO.
3 . IMAGE CUALJTV BCICATCRS AM) PBTRAMETZRS
The relative merits
and
disadvantages
of
use
of the
ISO wire IQI's
and
the ASTM penetrameterscan besummarized asfollows:T hewire IQI's
are mere universal
in
use,
a s for
practically
all
thicknesses
cf the
examined object thesameset ofthree IOI'scan beused.Ife.g.the
DIN
54 109
IOI's are used, containing
16
different wires, grouped into
.three set3 (1/7, 6/12,
1 0 / 1 6 ) ,
then therange of wire diameters
strecnes from
0.1 to 3.2 mn .
This means that
e.g. for
objects with
thicknesses from
10 to 320 mm a
1
radiographic sensitivity car.
be
checked.
Cn the
contrary, with
the
ASTM penetrameters
fcr
each thicx-
nasatf theobject under controlaseparateset cfthree penetrameters
is required inprinciple (astheir thiciciesses shallbe I, 2 and 4 %
oftheobject thickress).TheASTM penetrameters presentanadvantage
when thepenetrameter sensitivity iscalculated. Hereforeach pene-
trareter constant values ofsensitivityare set by itsconstant per
cent thickness andconstant relaticno f itshole diameters tothis
thickness.
On the
contrary
the ISO
wire IQI's will give different
101
sensitivities fcr thesame visible wire, depending cn thethickness
of
the
examined object.
The
differences between
the ISO ans
ASTM
sy
stemscan betest illustratedby thefollowing exarple takenfcr IC,
20
and 3C mm
thick plates,
as
used thrcughcut this investigation.
4.
RAT.:0GPAFH1C IMAGE QUALITY
As mentioned before a d ir ec t comparison was Tade of radiogra phic irag e
qu ali ty obtain ed by the use of the ISO wire I d ' s and the ASTM pen e
t r a n t *r3 fc r v ariou s brands of radiographic paper and a high speed
X-ray f i lm . The re su lt s ther eof are presented in the follow ing si x
diagrams.
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
15/22
I P late
1 t h i c k
n e s s
t
1U
SO
3 0
Percent IQ1 se n si ti v i t y (by the ISO method).
Minimum vi si b le DIN wire diam eter on a p la te of t mm
Wire No.
1 1 ? I 3 1 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 1 9 | 10 1 11
Wire diam eter - mm
3 . 2 0
lb
10.67
2 . 5 0
;?.5
U.33
2.00
2 0
10
b.67
1.60
16
a
5 . 3 3
1.25
12.5
b.2ft
4 .17
1.00
10.0
5
3 . 3 3
0 . 0 0
8 . 0
4
2 .67
0 . 6 3
6 . 3
3 .15
2 .10
0 . 5 0
5 . 0
2 . 5
1.67
0 . 4 0
4 . 0
2 .0
1.33
0 . 3 2
3 . 2
1.6
1.07
12
0 . 2 5
2 . 5
1.25
0 . 8 3
13
0 . 2 0
2 . 0
1.0
0 .67
14 | 15 | 16
0 .16
1.60
0 .8
0 . 5 3
0 .125
1.25
0 .63
0 .42
o ino
i.no
0 . 5 0
0 . 3 3
fc IO r-
u * ro
(J> O 00
* . *>
1 1 1
it 3 5
t
2
8
i
3
rv>
2
0
i
3
M
1
4
1
4 -
1
4
1
3
-
N> t->
b Vi
1 1
S J3
* IIS
T -C,
U r- O* J n
j i 3
E
v
e
n
p
n
r
r
n
e
s
n
-
t
v
y
A
r-
1
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
16/22
- 16 -
Fig . l . Image qu alit y for 10 mm Al.
4 . 1 .
AluTiniun
For
the
thinnest
Al
plate
(10
mm) wire
IQI
sensitivities
are
always
better
for the
high speed film than
for
paper. Only
one
paper/screen
combination (620/F2) could once
(at 35 kV)
give
the
same results
1%)as thefilm.Thefilm isalso less sensitivetothe voltagein
crease than paper.The 1%sensitivity reached with the wireIQIcould
nevertereached with theASTM penetrametar, which 3hcwed thetest
level
of 2-lT
(1.40) both for
D
film
and the
7CC/FI paper ccn*irati:n.
Nevertheless, the 20sensitivity caneasily bereached forfilmor
pacer bothfor thewireIQI aswellas theASTM ?enetrareter3ifcor
rect (Low) kilovoltageischosen.
For the 20 rnnplate equally good results couldbeobtained 'forthe
D filmandIC/ICIIpacer combination fcr wire IQI'3 'butatsligh-'iy
different vol -g*s: ~5Cand 45 kVrespectively). Also
te n
thepresent
ASTM sensitiv*/ wasworse than that reached with ISC' wires, although
the2-IT level (1.4%) ccuid be reached forseveral paper/reen
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
17/22
- 17 -
kV
:S0
iQt
O
I 'C I
600
ZQrrwi Al
620
700
ASTM
ptfWtra -
Nr.
%
iCII
F1
j c m
F2 I P1 I F2 i Fl
F2
CM l l ii l iF n i i i ll l H L i i i^ B i ^ i i r B l 'O i i i B l J ^ i i l B a ^ i i lE ' j l L jy :
f l l l i l l .
LM
Fig.2.Image qualityfor 20 mmAl.
combinations.
AtX nm the Dfilm wasbyone wire better thananypaper/screen com
bination
at any
kilovoltage. Also here
the 2-lT
level (1.4%) could
be reachedforseveral paper/screen combinations.
In generalthe 2-2Tlevel (2)caneasilybereachedforallAlplates
and paper/screen combinations. Thisisalso truefor the2 wire sen
sitivity.
The ASTM penetrameter sensitivity
was
also investigated
for a
larger
rangeof Althictaesses (3.18to88.90 mm) withaconstant potential
X-ray machine (45 to 160 KV) byHollcway and issutmarily reported
in [7J, whereas [8] gives full details.
4.2. Steel
FortneinvestigationofsteelaseLfrectified X-ray machine was used.
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
18/22
- 13 -
70
tr-,
yililiiyiiiii iii
| . T T
;
^ f
l -JT
Fig.3.linage qualityfor X ion Al.
At 10
am
only the
D
film could give
the
1.25ftwire sensitivity, where
as
the 2-2T
penetraneter level (2 )could
be
reached with several
paper/screen combinationsatdifferent kilcvoltage.Itcould, however,
notbereachedenthe0film.
At-20 mm the0.3* wire sensitivity cculdbereachedat I X hVboth
f?r
'ha D
film
as
well
as the
700/F2 paper.
The
same was true
fcr th*
2-17 level (1.4ft),whereas
the 2-2T
level
(2%)
cculd
be
reached
by
almostallpaper/screen combinations.
AtX aw the Dfilm showsthebest wire sensitivir/(I.(77ft),whereas
equal penetrameter2-ITlevel (I.**) canberead-ad bcthfor thefilm
and paper.
Unfortunately, no such comparative investigation cf radiographic
quality fcr paper
and
steel cculd
be
fcund
in
the literature.
5. CCgCLU5IC?g
*niie ccqparing
:ne
results
of
radiographic inage quality investig
ations performed with
the ISC
wire ICI's
and
AS7M perstraneters
Che
following conclusions
can be
irawn:
1)
The
ASTM penetrametr level
l-l?
(0.7S) cculd never
be
reached,
neither withthefilm hor withthepaper.
2)The 1-2TIr/el (1.0JS) cculdbe:nly exceptionally reachedandcr.ly
ii r the Dfilm (JC sinAi at 50 /).
3)In most instances reachingthe 2-1?level (l.-%)ispossible both
for filmandpaper.
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
19/22
-
19 -
i
3
kV
T25
15C
175
200
225
250
275
300
ISO
IQI
N t
nrr
m m
F>
600
620
700
S KH
aeati ICH I Fl | F2 1 F1 I F2
ASTM
psnctro-
mttir
ltvl
4
F o r t h e
t i v i t y
F i g . 4 . I m a g e q u a l i t y f o r 1 0mmF e .
s a m e f i l a i
or
p a p e r b r a n d t h e a b s o l u t e w i r e p e r c e n t s e n s i-
a L w a y s b e t t e r t h a n t h a t f s r t n e p e n e t r a m e t e r .
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
20/22
- 20
Fig. 5. Image quality for 20 mm Fe.
5) This mean thar it is easier to detect a wire of the same diameter
as a hole in a penetrameter. This difference is more visible for
the paper than film.
6) From the above investigation no definitive conclusion can be drawn
about the superiority of any brand of the radiographic paper.
7) The same is true when one compares the use of the Kodak Fl and F2
screens with different brar.d3 of the Kodak paper.
8)
,-.}
a general conclusion it can be said that it is easier to assess
the radiographic image quality of the radiographic paper with the
ISO wire IOI's than the ASTM penetrometers.
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
21/22
- 21 -
Fig. 6. Image quality for 30 nm Fe.
REFERENCES
J.C. Dcmanus, Industrial radiography on radiographic paper.
Rise Report Mo. 371. November 1977.
J.C. Dcmanus and C. Mikkelsen, Comparison of X-ray film and paper
radiography. Ris-M-1995. April 1978 and Proceedings of the First
European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing. Mainz, 24-26.4.
1978.67/593-601.
J.C. Dcmanus and P.A. Ruault, Industrial application of radio
graphic paper. Materiaipriifung 22
1 9 8 0 ) ,
Nr. 3, 111-17.
J.C. Dcmanus and H. Lilholt, Non-destructive control of carbon
fibre reinforced composites by soft X-ray radiography. Rise-M-
1979.
January 1978 and Proceedings of the 1978 International Con
ference on Composite Materials. 16-20.4.1978, Toronto, Canada,
1072-1C92.
J.A. HLicway and J.W. Sohlen, Air Force evaluation of Industrex
Instant 300 radiographic paper system. Materials Evaluation,
April 1977, 39-45.
ANSI/ASTM E 142-77. Standard method for controlling quality of
radiographic testing.
ISC Recommendation R 1C27. Radiographic image quality indicators.
Principles and identification.
J.A. Hollcway and T.R. Henderson, Evaluation of a radiographic
paper system using ultraviolet fluorescent screens. AFML-TR-72-
165.Part I and II. March L975.
8/10/2019 RISOM2314
22/22
Ris National L aboratory
Ris-M-GZiD
Title and author(s)
Q u a l i t y o f t h e r a d i o g r a p h i c i m a ge
i n p a p e r r a d i o g r a p h y
J . C . Domanus and H . M. E l F ou ly
Group's own registration
number(s)
21 P*gs + 3 tab les + i l lu s t r a t i on s
>*
S e p t e m b e r 1 9 8 1
Department or group
M e t a l l u r g y
Abstract
The quality of the radiographic image was inve
stigated by the use of standard ISO wire Image
Quality Indicators and ASTM Penetrameters. 10,
20,
and 30 mm thick welds on aluminium and
steel plates were radiographed using X-ray
machines with voltages from 35 to 300 kV. Agfa-
Gevaert Structurix IC paper with Structurix IC
screens Type II as well as Kodak Industrex 600
and 620 and Rapid 700 paper with Fl and F2
screens were used throughout the investigation.
The results reached for radiographic paper were
compared with those for a fast X-ray film (Kodak
Industrex
D) .
The results of the investigation
were presented at the International Conference
Joining of Metals JOM-1 in Elsinore, Denmark
(9-12.8.1981) and at the Second European Confe
rence on Non-Destructive Testing in Vienna
(14-16.9.1981).The texts of both papers are
reproduced in this report.
Copies
to
Available
on
request from Ris Library, Ris National
Laboratory (RisBibliotek),Porsgsanls?Ris),
DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Telephone: (03) 37 12 12 , ext.2262.Telexs43116