Robotics Intensive Gui Cavalcanti 1/10/2012 Overview What is this place? Who is this guy? What have I gotten myself into? What can I expect? How do you

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Robotics Intensive Gui Cavalcanti 1/10/2012
  • Slide 3
  • Overview What is this place? Who is this guy? What have I gotten myself into? What can I expect? How do you design a robot, anyway? Whats the plan?
  • Slide 4
  • What is this place?
  • Slide 5
  • Artisans Asylum, Inc. Nonprofit community workshop 31,000 square feet Multiple craft areas Welding, machining, metalworking, woodworking, electronics assembly, sewing, bicycle repair, and more 20-25 classes a month
  • Slide 6
  • Who is this guy?
  • Slide 7
  • Gui Cavalcanti Robotics Engineer and System Integrator, Boston Dynamics, 2007-2011 Robotics Engineering, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering, 2009 Lab Manager and Research Assistant, Dr. Gill Pratts Biomimetic Robotics Lab, 2005-2009 Research Assistant, Dr. David Barretts Intelligent Vehicles Laboratory, 2004-2005 FIRST Robotics Team 422, 2000-2004
  • Slide 8
  • How I Got Started
  • Slide 9
  • How I (Actually) Got Started
  • Slide 10
  • Past Projects LS3 (BDI) BigDog (BDI) RiSE (BDI) PETMAN (BDI) Robot Tuna (Olin) Shorty George (Olin) Ornithopter (RLG) Sidewinder (Olin) Serpentine (Olin) Autonomous ATV (Olin) Cyclone (Personal) 5 FIRST Robotics (MLWGS)
  • Slide 11
  • Past Projects
  • Slide 12
  • Most Recent Project
  • Slide 13
  • Who are you?
  • Slide 14
  • Who Are You? Whats your name? Whats your background? Why do you like robots? What are you hoping to get out of the class? Whats your favorite robot and why?
  • Slide 15
  • What have I gotten myself into?
  • Slide 16
  • A Grand Experiment + Public, project-based education
  • Slide 17
  • A Grand Experiment, Cont. LS3: $1,500,000 in components PETMAN: $2,000,000 in components BigDog: $500,000 in components Robot Tuna: $30,000 in components FIRST: $6,500 buy-in with donations
  • Slide 18
  • A Grand Experiment, Cont. Most of you will know more than I do in your areas of expertise
  • Slide 19
  • A Grand Experiment, Cont. Teamwork is necessary in robotics, but teamwork and education can sometimes be at odds Amateurs defer to experts Its easier and less stressful to apply what you know than force yourself to do something new Competition and deadline stress can get in the way of digesting and learning meaningful things
  • Slide 20
  • What can I expect?
  • Slide 21
  • From Yourself You will get out what you are willing to put in.
  • Slide 22
  • From Fellow Students Respect Help Knowledge Inspiration
  • Slide 23
  • From Me Responsiveness Learning opportunities Project organization Responsibility Trust
  • Slide 24
  • What I expect of you
  • Slide 25
  • My Expectations Of You Respect for everyone involved, and their respective skill level Openness to feedback Lack of design defensiveness Patience
  • Slide 26
  • How do you design a robot, anyway?
  • Slide 27
  • What is a robot? My definition: Autonomous physical agent capable of manipulating the world around it Responds to sensory input Makes decisions based on that sensory input
  • Slide 28
  • Who is a roboticist? Myth: Someone who does everything equally well and operates on their own Reality: Someone who has mastery of their field within robotics, who has had significant exposure to the other fields, and can work as part of a team
  • Slide 29
  • Robot Design Many design styles feed into robot design Static mechanical design Dynamic mechanical design Electrical design Control system design Software design Sensing design System design Each of the design styles in and of themselves are the subject of hundreds of Ph.D. theses each year. All robots require elements of all of these design styles
  • Slide 30
  • Static Mechanical Design Design of load-bearing robotic structures Straight out of a mechanical engineering textbook, though advances in materials and manufacturing processes are slowly changing the field
  • Slide 31
  • Dynamic Mechanical Design Design of moving parts Actuation and power transmission sizing Limb design Hose and wire routing Design for controllability Most often dismissed form of robot design, because its really hard and people assume its largely a solved problem (like Static Mechanical Design)
  • Slide 32
  • Electrical Design Design of electrical control systems and power systems for electrical actuation Robot controllers Communications Sensors Actuator amplifiers Largely regarded as black magic compared to programming and mechanical design Is its own field, but can be black boxed to some extent.
  • Slide 33
  • Control System Design Design of the behaviors of robots to make them usefully autonomous Layered; for example: 1.Actuator control 2.Limb control 3.Localization 4.Behavior planning 5.Goal development Can be completely independent from actually writing code Most difficult and least understood area of robot design, for a number of different reasons Are we even smart enough to do this? Is its own field of study, but sprawls across multiple disciplines
  • Slide 34
  • Software Design Implementation of Control System Design on specific hardware Many different levels, from firmware to main loop Is its own well-defined field, like Mechanical Design
  • Slide 35
  • Sensing Design Selection of physical sensors and utilization of their data in a meaningful way External sensors Homeostasis sensors Proprioception sensors Can be thought of as an extension of electrical, control or mechanical design, but I think its significant enough to warrant its own design style
  • Slide 36
  • System Design How on earth do you have a working robot at the end of all of your disparate design cycles? Sizing power systems to match actuation and other power load Resolving volume, weight and component placement conflicts Routing wires, hoses, structural members Taking a high-level, informed view of many incredibly specialized fields Managing all of the engineering subteams Optimized parts DO NOT make for optimized systems
  • Slide 37
  • Whats the plan?
  • Slide 38
  • Robot 1: Robot Vending Machine Purpose: Roam around the space selling snacks, developing habits Requirements: Vend snacks on a recurring, regular (read: Pavlovian) basis Safely stop for all humans and obstacles Be capable of rerouting (by retracing) around fixed obstacles Follow a course that covers the entire Asylum Look awesome Play music and act in a way that does not inspire rampant vandalism
  • Slide 39
  • Robot 2: Robotic Shop Vac Purpose: Roam around the space cleaning the aisles and inspiring others to clean Requirements: Vacuum aisles as it patrols them Be rideable? Serve as a cleaning center for Asylum members Safely stop for all humans and obstacles Be capable of rerouting (by retracing) around fixed obstacles Follow a course that covers the entire Asylum Look awesome
  • Slide 40
  • The Mission
  • Slide 41
  • Approximate Schedule 1.Introductions, Brainstorming, Team Assignation 2.Programming and Control Intro and Kickoff 3.Demonstration of Control Systems 4.Top-Level Conceptual Design 5.Mechanical and Electrical Conceptual Design 6.Design Session, Preliminary Design Review 7.Design Session 8.Critical Design Review, Fabrication Plans 9-12. Fabrication
  • Slide 42
  • Goals for Everyone Participate in a programming and control system design exercise on a 4-person team Participate in conceptual design and component selection for major subsystems Participate in top-level design reviews Participate in design integration meetings Participate in one design team and one fabrication team
  • Slide 43
  • Design & Fabrication Teams Design Teams: Use components selected during conceptual design exercises Conduct detail design specific to one individual robot Conduct design reviews of other robot teams work Create plans for fabrication teams Fabrication Teams: Fabricate robot based on design team plans Debug design issues on the fly
  • Slide 44
  • Team Dynamics Either Controls (Team 1) Mech. Design (Team 1) Elec. Design (Team 1) Programming (Team 2) Mech. Fabrication (Team 1) Elec. Fabrication (Team 1)
  • Slide 45
  • Team Dynamics Or Controls (Team 1) Mech. Design (Team 1) Elec. Design (Team 1) Programming (Team 2) Mech. Fabrication (Team 2) Elec. Fabrication (Team 2)
  • Slide 46
  • Design Team Roles Systems Engineer (1 person): Manages the interaction between design teams, resolves inter-team conflicts Controls Team (3 people): Designs top-level control system and line to successfully navigate Tyler Street, and creates controls flowchart for programming team Mechanical Team (3 people): Designs frame and drivetrain components, and mounts for all supported equipment Electrical Team (3 people): Develops the electrical diagram for the robot, designing the electronics box and selecting all major components, wire, and interconnects
  • Slide 47
  • Fabrication Team Roles Production Manager (1 person): Sets deadlines, keeps all fabrication teams on the same schedule, resolves design conflicts that cross fabrication team borders Programming Team (3 people): Implements the system developed by the controls team on specific hardware, lays out lines to follow, debugs robots Mechanical Team (3 people): Welds frame together, machines drivetrain components, assembles mechanical systems, widens holes/replaces parts/etc on the fly Electrical Team (3 people): Builds out and wires electronics box, debugs electrical gremlins on the fly
  • Slide 48
  • Comments? Questions? Requests?
  • Slide 49
  • Its go time.