Upload
barrie-craig
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
routing
GenRiver 1.0Distributed process-based model
spatial scale: 1-1000 ha,temporal scale: daily
Can be used as a tool to explore our understanding of historical changes in river flow due to land use change
stem-flow
through-fall
rainfall cloudinterception
lateral
outflow
percolation
rechargeinfiltration
surfaceevaporation
transpiration
canopy waterevaporation
uptake
baseflow
{
surface run-on
sub-surfacelateral
inflow
surface run-off
Quick flow
Trees
Soil
Hydrological functions of forest:
Landscape drainage
?
PES
RegulationSpatial planning
‘Permanent’ site characteristics Upland land use
Watershedfunctions
Downstream water users & stakeholders
Riverbed engineering
poverty
poverty
poverty
poverty
Watershedfunctions
1. Transmit water
2. Buffer peak rain events
3. Release gradually
4. Maintain quality
5. Reduce mass wasting
Site cha- racteristics
• Rainfall
• Land form
• Soil type• Rooting
depth (natural vegetation)
Relevantfor
• Downstream water users,
• esp. living in floodplains & river beds,
• esp. without storage
• or purification• at foot of slope
stem-flow
through-fall
rainfall cloudinterception
lateral
outflow
percolation
recharge
infiltration
surfaceevaporation
transpiration
canopy waterevaporation
uptake
quick-flow
baseflow
{
surfacerun-on
sub-surfacelateral
inflow
surfacerun-off
Stream:
GenRiver 1.0a simple model that translates a plot-level water balance to landscape level river flow
Land cover influences:
* evapotranspiration -> water yield (immediate)
* infiltration (medium term ~ soil type)
3. Subsurface flow into streams: ‘interflow’ or ‘soilquickflow’
1. Interception & evaporation from wet surfaces
5. Gradual release to streams through deep soil pathways
2. Overland flow into streams: quickflow
4. Uptake by plants for transpiration (+ soil evaporation)
14
2
3
5
Unit hydrograph – what happens to an ‘average’ drop of rainfall?
The core of the model :
Patch level represent daily water balance, driven by local rain rainfall and modified by land cover and soil properties of the patch
The patch can contribute to three types of stream flow :
1. Surface quick flow – on the day of rain event
2. Soil quick flow – on the next day after rain event
3. Base flow – via gradual release of groundwater
3. Subsurface flow into streams: ‘interflow’ or ‘soilquickflow’
1. Interception & evaporation from wet surfaces
5. Gradual release to streams through deep soil pathways
2. Overland flow into streams: quickflow
4. Uptake by plants for transpiration (+ soil evaporation)
14
2
3
5
Unit hydrograph – what happens to an ‘average’ drop of rainfall?
1. Interception & evaporation from wet surfaces 1
Step 1 – canopy interception
Rainfall per event, mm
Water storage on leaf sur- faces, mm
Capacity limitedThr
ough
fall
prob
abili
ty1:1
Current LAI
Waterfilm thickness
Will evaporate within a day
=Cap*(1-EXP(-Rain/Cap))
Calder (2004) HYLUC
1. Interception & evaporation from wet surfaces
2. Overland flow into streams: quickflow
1
2
Step 2 – Lack of Infiltration => overland flow
Two conditions lead to overland flow:
•Surface infiltrability less than required during storm (‘Hortonian’ overland flow, ‘sealing’ of the surface’); slope, surface roughness and rainfall intensity determine the time available for infiltration
•Saturation-limited: surface soil layers are saturated and rate of outflow determines possible rate of inflow
Rain duration,Can.Interc.DelaySurface staorage,
Slope SoilSat - Actual
PotInfRate
3. Subsurface flow into streams: ‘interflow’ or ‘soilquickflow’
1. Interception & evaporation from wet surfaces
2. Overland flow into streams: quickflow 1
2
3
Step 3 – Soil quickflow: drain towards ‘field capacity’
SoilQuickFlow: Max(0,Soil- FieldCap)
Saturation
SaturationGW store
Percolation Fraction
GW release Fraction Baseflow
FC
‘Two-tank model’
RootZone store
3. Subsurface flow into streams: ‘interflow’ or ‘soilquickflow’
1. Interception & evaporation from wet surfaces
2. Overland flow into streams: quickflow
4. Uptake by plants for transpiration (+ soil evaporation)
14
2
3
Step 4 – Plant uptake and transpitation
(Epot – IntercEff * Einterc) * W_avail
1.0
0
Soil water content
FC*DroughtFactor(VegType)
PWPEnergy driven,
e.g.Penman
Evaporation of intercepted water reduces transp.
demand
3. Subsurface flow into streams: ‘interflow’ or ‘soilquickflow’
1. Interception & evaporation from wet surfaces
5. Gradual release to streams through deep soil pathways
2. Overland flow into streams: quickflow
4. Uptake by plants for trans-piration (+ soil evaporation)
14
2
3
5
Step 5 – Percolation to streams as ‘slow flow’
SaturationPercolation Fraction
GW release Fraction Baseflow
GW store
RootZone store
3. Subsurface flow into streams: ‘interflow’ or ‘soilquickflow’
1. Interception & evaporation from wet surfaces
5. Gradual release to streams through deep soil pathways
2. Overland flow into streams: quickflow
4. Uptake by plants for transpiration (+ soil evaporation)
14
2
3
5
Unit hydrograph – what happens to an ‘average’ drop of rainfall?
Topology of stream network: distances to array of observation points
Obs point 1 2 3 4 5
SubA 15 -1 -1 7 .
SubB 16 -1 -1 8 .
SubC 14 8 2 -1 .
SubD 8 1 -1 -1 .
…..
F
G
D
C
E
BA
1
2
3 4
Inherentinterception &
water useproperties
Rai
nfal
l per
day
pe
r su
bcat
chm
ent
Potentially: surface infiltration properties per landcover type as a function of time (LU change per subcatchment)
Subcatchments
Tim
e
Inherent properties: - soil and groundwater storage capacity, - soil drainage & GW release fraction- routing time from stream to river monitoring point
Array dimensions in the model
Model implementation in Excel
GenRiver.xls :
1. Rain & Debit data (daily)
2. Land cover
3. Subcatchment info
Model implementation in Stella
GenRiver.stm
Model sector
Model implementation in Stella
GenRiver.stm
GenRiver.stm Input section
Model implementation in Stella
GenRiver.stm
GenRiver.stm Patch level water
balance
Model implementation in Stella
GenRiver.stm
GenRiver.stm River flow
Default run of GenRiver 1.0measured predicted
measured predicted
When seen over a long time series, both under- and over-estimates occur in dry periods, but the model tends to exaggerate
peaks
The model is in the ‘right range’ but underestimates flows in dry periods and exaggerates peaks
measured predicted
Model implementation in Stella
GenRiver.stm
GenRiver.stm Output sector
GenRiver application in Sumberjaya - Indonesia
Using 2 time series of land cover fractions :
Year 3(%) Year 20(%)
Forest 58 14
Cropland 22 11
Coffee 12 70
Explore the effect of land cover &
spatial pattern for rainfall on river flow
Cumulative water balance
River flow using Pathcy & Homogenous rain
Patchy year 3 Patchy year 20
Hm year 3 Hm year 20
SpatRain.xls
SpatRain.exe
WShedInd.xlsGenRiver.stm
What we offer
Input dataOutput -
hydrographs
Criteria & indicators of watershed functions
Participants Expectations?
Climate, soil, scale, land use
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 50 100 150Rainfall (3 stations), mm day-1
Riv
er f
low
, mm
day
-11975-1981
1982-1988
1990-1998
y = 0.02x + 0.85
y = -0.19x + 0.53
R2 = 0.01
0.10.2
0.30.4
0.50.6
0.70.8
0.91.0
0.35 0.45 0.55 0.65 0.75 0.85
Total Water Yield Fraction
Ind
ica
tors
y = -0.33x + 0.99
R2 = 0.46
y = 0.02x + 0.65
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.35 0.45 0.55 0.65 0.75 0.85Total Water Yield Fraction
Ind
ica
tors
Relative buffering
Buffering
Buffering Peak Events
Lowest Monthly Flow
Simulation results: current ‘MixedLU’ situation not much different from ‘forest’, but for a ‘Degraded soil’
buffering would be much lessHomogenous Rain
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 20 40 60 80 100Rain exeedance, mm day -1
Riv
erf
low
ex
ee
da
nc
e,
mm
da
y -
1
AllForest MixedLU AllGrass MixedLU(Act)
Patchy Rain
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 20 40 60 80 100Rain exeedance, mm day -1
Riv
erfl
ow
exe
edan
ce,
mm
day
-1
AllForest MixedLU AllGrass MixedLU(Act)
Homogenous rain Patchy rain
currentDegraded soil
currentDegraded soil