Rowan-Salisbury School District

Continuous Improvement Performance Plan

2010-2011

Focus

“The primary focus of Federal and State monitoring activities shall be on improving education resultsimproving education results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities. ”

Monitoring Priorities 616(a)(3)

The Secretary shall monitor States and require each state to monitor its LEAs using quantifiable indicators to measure performance in the following areas:

1. FAPE in the LRE 2. Disproportionality 3. Effective General Supervision

State Performance Plan Reporting616(b)(2)(C)

States must annually collect data in these priority areas to analyze the performance of each LEA.

Each state must report annually to the Secretary on its performance under its performance plan.

States must report annually to the public on the performance of each LEA on the identified targets in the state’s performance plan.

Rowan Salisbury Schools Data Story

Indicator 1Graduation

Percent of youth with IEPs graduating

from high school with a regular diploma.

State Target 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

80% 63.1% 56.8% 57.3%

Indicator 2Drop Out

Percent of students with IEPs dropping out of high school.

State Target 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

6% 9.4% 8.7% 10%

Indicator 3

Assessment

Participation and performance of children with

disabilities on statewide assessment.

RSS did not meet AYP for

the past three years.

Indicator 3Assessment Participation

Reading

Grade State Target

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

3 95 100 98.9 94.5

4 95 99.2 100 97.6

5 95 100 99.5 98.5

6 95 99.5 99.4 98.5

7 95 100 98.4 95.2

8 95 99.5 99.5 96.3

10 95 95.7 77.4 65.1

Indicator 3Assessment Participation

Math

Grade State Target

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

3 95 100 100 94.5

4 95 99.2 100 97.6

5 95 100 99.5 98.5

6 95 99 99.4 97.5

7 95 99.5 97.8 95.2

8 95 99.5 99.5 96.3

10 95 88.4 79.3 65.1

Indicator 3Assessment Performance

Reading

07-08

28.7

24.4

12.9

18.8

13.5

16.6

27.3

Grade

3 43.2

4 43.2

5 43.2

6 43.2

7 43.2

8 43.2

10 38.5

08-09

27.7

35.7

29.0

24.1

26.0

26.1

24.0

09-10

22.6

31.9

29.0

34.7

24.4

32.6

14.8

State Target

RSS Data

Indicator 3Assessment Performance

Math

07-08

48.2

32.7

30.4

23.7

31.8

34.1

46.7

Grade

3 77.2

4 77.2

5 77.2

6 77.2

7 77.2

8 77.2

10 68.4

08-09

50.5

52.9

41.1

38.6

35.0

52.3

37.5

09-10

49.0

47.6

48.5

38.6

41.9

46.7

45.4

State Target

RSS Data

Indicator 4Suspension/Expulsion

Rates of suspension and expulsion of students with disabilities greater than 10 days in a school year that is twice the state average or greater.

State Target 2007-08 = 8% of LEAs

State Target 2008-09 = 8% of LEAs

State Target 2009-10 = 6% of LEAs

State Target was met.

Baseline data was collected for 09-10.

Indicator 5Least Restrictive Environment

Percent of children with IEPs aged 6

through 21 served in regular, separate,

or public, private, home or hospital

settings.

Indicator 5Least Restrictive Environment

Setting State Target

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

Regular >65.6% 74.5 71.4 69.2

Separate <15.3% 17.8 19.1 18.8

Home/Hospital

<2.0% 0.6 0.7 0.9

Indicator 6Least Restrictive Environment

For Preschool

Data for this indicator will be reported for the first time in February 2012.

Indicator 7Preschool Outcomes

Percent of preschool children with IEPs who demonstrate improvement in:

Positive social-emotional skills,

Acquisition and use of knowledge

Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs.

Indicator 7LEA Data

PK with Improved .

. .

08-09Student changed growth

trajectories in PK Program

08-09 Student was functioning like same aged peers

when exiting PK

09-10Student changed growth

trajectories in PK Program

09-10 Student was functioning like same aged peers

when exiting PK

Social Emotional Skills

100% 44% 99% 63%

Use of Skills

100% 25% 99% 64%

Appropriate

Behavior100% 50% 95% 65%

Indicator 8Parent Involvement

Percent of parents with a child receiving special education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving service and results for children with disabilities.

State Target: 2009-10 = 40%RSS: 32% when sampled in 07-08

LEAs with less than 50,000 students are surveyed once every 5 years.

Indicator 9Disproportionality in EC

Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.

State Target - 0% of LEAs

RSS - not disproportional

Indicator 10Disproportionality by Category

Percent of districts with disproportionate

representation of racial and ethnic groups

in specific disability categories that is the

result of inappropriate identification.

State target: 0% of LEAs

RSS: not disproportional

Indicator 1190 Day Timeline

Percent of children referred for whom a

referral was received and placement

determined within 90 days.

State Target 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

100% 74.5% 71.6% 92.96%

Indicator 12Part C to Part B

Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3 and who are found eligible for Part B who receive special education and related services by their third birthday.

State Target 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

100% 92.1% 62.1% 79.71%

Indicator 13IEPs and Postsecondary Goals

Indicator 13: Percent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are annually updated and based upon an age appropriate transition assessment, transition services, including courses of study, that will reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, and annual IEP goals related to the student’s transition services needs.

There also must be evidence that the student was invited to the IEP Team meeting where transition services are to be discussed and evidence that, if appropriate, a representative of any participating agency was invited to the IEP Team meeting with the prior consent of the parent or student who has reached the age of majority.

Indicator 13IEPs and Postsecondary Goals

State Target 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

100% 97.7% 100% 100%

Indicator 14Post-School Outcomes

• Percent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:

• A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.

• B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.

• C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

State Target: baseline data was collected in 2009-10

RSS: was sampled in 2009-10 - 69%

Indicator 15General Supervision

Percent of compliance rate of Internal Record Review

State Target 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

100% 61% 82.7% 100%