: ^:;.---'"**-,- i ftKjf

CHESTER J. KURYLIW, M.Sc., P.Ewo.COKOULTINO

52je4SEW13 52J04SEM17 ZARN LAKE 010

CHESTER J. KURYLIW STAR LAKE CLAIM GROUP

PATRICIA DISTRICT, N-W ONTARIO

RECEIVEDJAM 2 4 1983

MINING LANDS SECTION

REPORTON

DETAILED GEOLOGIC NAPPING

DRYDEN, ONTARIO DEC. 30, 1982

CHESTER J. KURYLIW, K.SC..P.ENG. CONSULTING GEOLOGIST

Nvf^-;;; V^V&'.'SfciSv...' •''.•s.' •'^•••'•.•^••••.•"••. .:;..!-: *-•:-Hw-' ii-^-''''*Si'-';".

CHESTER J. KURVLIW, M.Sc., P.Eno. CBouooitrr

5aj04SE0ei3 52J04SE0017 ZARN LAKE

INDEX

Title Page

Property, Location and Access

Introduction

Topography, Overburden, Tree Growth

General Geology

Local GeologyTable of Formations

(1) Pleistocene Deposits(2) Quartz-Feldspar-Porphyry Dykes(3) Basic Intrusive (Gabbro?)(4) Rhyolitic Rocks(5) Andesite to Basalt Tuffs and Flows(6) Dacite-Andesite Tuffs and Flows

Structural Geology

Conclusions

Recommendations

Certificate

010C

f 9,:--

CHESTER J . KURYL1W, M.Sc., P.ENO.CONHVLTINO

PROPERTY. LOCATION AND ACCESS

i- ,- ;~ The property consists of a group of six claims over Star

v Lake and adjoining land. This claim group is located about " 12 miles East-South East of the town of Sioux Lookout, Ont.

The C.N. branch line from Superior Junction to Thunder Bay

' passes i mile South of the claim group and Hwy. 6**2 from Sioux Lookout is located -| mile South of the claim group.

Access to the property by boat from a private road that joins Hwy. 6**2 with Kirk Lake. Access is also available over land from Hwy. 6*^2 along a portage trail.

The Property

The Star Lake claim group consists of six claims.

A Pa. 59*O06Pa. 59*O07 Pa. 59*O08 Pa. 59*O09

: Pa. 59*O10 ^ Pa.

#

m.

fe

..-. .,.- .^.,. .. . . ..: -''^ ^:^:'^^:^^

CHES" ER J. KURYWW, M.Sc., P.Ewo.CONBX.T.TINO '

INTRODUCTION

This claim group was staked at the end of May 1982 to cover a high frequency electromagnetic anomaly indicated on the Ontario

Geologic Survey's airborne electromagnetic survey map 80557 is

sued in May 1982.The linecutting was carried out by contractors Adrian and

Judy Kuryliw during the last half of December 1982. The grid

consists of a North 650 East base line with picket lines running N-250 -W. The picket lines were cut at ^00 ft. intervals on the

land and the grid lines on the ice were laid out at 200 ft.

intervals.The geologic mapping was carried out in the field in early

November by this writer and the data was plotted and interpreted

on a plan of geology, scale l" * 200 ft. This plan accompanies

this report.

CHESTER J. KXJRYLI'W, M.Sc., P.E-o.COXMLT.T1NO CHOLORIWT

TOPOGRAPHY. OVERBURDEN AND TREE GROWTH

The Topography is one of low relief. Star Lake occupies a stream valley and the adjoining shorelines consist of low level muskeg swamps that contain Alder, Tamaralk and Black Spruce Growth.

The North shore of the Lake consists largely of low level flat terrain overgrown with good timber that consists of Balsam, Spruce and Poplar. The overburden consists largely of silty clay.

To the South of Star Lake much of the ground consists of low level flat ridges that are underlain by sandy soil and these are covered by a good growth of Jack Pine- Balsam1 Spruce timber.

Ontario Geological Survey

Map 2442 SIOUX LOOKOUT-ARMSTRONG

Geological Compilation SeriesKENORA and THUNDER BAY DISTRICTS

M.lfl

Metres 5000

Scale 1:253,440 or l Inch lo 4 Miles6 .8______10, U————14

10 __________?0

16 10

CHKSTER J. KURYL1-W, M.Sc., P.Ewo.COKHVLT1NC* CBOLOttllTT

GENERAL GEOLOGY

The most recent geologic map covering this area is "Geo logic Compolation Map" No. 2^*42 of the Sioux Lookout, Armstrong

Area, scale l" = b miles.The area is underlain by precambrian rocks, which consist

of groups of basic Volcanics and minor Rhyolitic groups of Vol canics. These rocks have been intruded by the large Lake of Bays Batholith to the S-East and the Split Lake Granodiorite

Stock about ^ miles to the N-East.Several known occurrences of precious and base metal miner

alization occur around the Split Lake Stock.

i.

r

-' ' . ; .'"\ ' T. .,..'. . -,vi'." '. r. . .\ . .^- ; r'; '^/ '*^J-tiftity3ife±foifa-^ --

CHESTER J. K.URYL.l'W, M.Se., P.Ewo. CONWI.TINO c toi.or.tmr

LOCAL GEOLOGY

Table of Formations

~~~ CenozoicPleistocene and Recent Organics - Bogs, Muskegs Overburden

PrecambrianAcid Intrusives

Quartz - Feldspar Porphyry Dykes

Basic IntrusivesGabbro

VolcanicsRhyolitic Rocks Basic Tuffs and Lavas Intermediate Tuffs and Lavas

JtV-v.ii- B&&

CHESTER J. KURYLltV, M.Sc., P.Ewo.CONHU1.T1NO

LOCAL GEOLOGY

CenozoicPleistocene and Recent Organics and Overburden.The swamps adjoining the stream valley and parts of the

shores of Star Lake are covered with organic filled muskegs and bogs. The flat lying stream valley is overlain with deposits of silty clay with some sand deposits of glacial origin that

occur to the South of Star Lake.

Precambrian Rock Types

(1) Quartz - Feldspar Porphyry Dykes.Several Quartz - Feldspar Porphyry Dykes were mapped on

the North and South shores near the West end of Star Lake. These Dykes strike East, N-East and are S ill-Intrusions into the She ared Tuffs. The Quartz - Feldspar Porphyry Dykes are composed

largely of white Feldspar, some Sericite, 0-5# Quartz Pheno- crysts and 1-3^ disseminated Pyrite. The Mafic mineral is lar gely Biotite-and is usually less than 5# of the rock.

Basic IntrusivesOne small outcrop of Gabbro was mapped as a Sill that in

truded along the Rhyolitic Tuff bedding on the point on line 0-East near the base line. It was composed almost exclusively of Amphiboles with up to I Q'% Feldspar.

The magnetic survey outlines an Intrusive which underlies Star Lake as a Magnetic Anomaly. The composition of this Intru sive is not known but is assumed to be Gabbroic because of its higher magnetics and the epitotization of the adjoining Tuffs to

the South.The occurence of swarms of Quartz-Feldspar Porphyry Dykes

in Tuffs along the porifery of this Intrusive also indicates some possibility that the Intrusive may be a Porphyry or Gano-

diorite Stock.

rCHESTER J. KURYL-I-W, M.Sc., P.E~o.

CONHVLTINO

VolcanicsRhyolitic Rock s i

Rhyolite Rocks were mapped to the West of Star Lake. The outcrops consist of a series of well banded Tuffs and Rhyolitic

Flows that trend Northerly but have a strongly superimposed East, N-East schistosity. In some outcrops Breccia fragments

of Rhyolite are aligned along the E, N.E sheared directions and these may represent Fault-Zones.

-L Basic Tuffs and Lavas

To the South and East of Fnyolite formation an interlay- ered formation of basic Tuffs, Flows, and pillowed Lavas occur.

These Volcanics are Andesite to Basalt in composition. These

basic Volcanics occur to the North of the hidden Star Lake In

trusive. The contact area between the basic Tuffs and the In trusive is intruded by a series of Quartz - Feldspar Porphyry Sills.

Intermediate Tuffs and LavasThese -rocks were mapped on the South side of Star Lake and

these consist of Dacitic to Andes itic Tuffs with some inter-

layered epidotized Andesitic Flows. These rocks adjoin the Star Lake Intrusive to the South and are also intruded by Quartz- Feldspar Porphvry Dykes near its contact with the Intrusive.

CHESTER J. KVMYL1W, M.Sc., P.E-o.CBOIOOIBT

STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY

A sequence of Volcanic Rocks that strike East-N-East and dip 45 - 600 , N-N-Westerly occur at Star Lake. This sequence consist of Rhyolitic Tuffs and Flows about 800 ft. thick to the North. To the South of the Rhyolitic rooks a formation of basic Tuffs, Flows, and Pillowed Lavas is about 500 ft. thick. To the South of the basic Volcanics is a formation of Inter mediate to Basic Tuffs and Flows that are epidotized, these are of undetermined thickness.

An Intrusive of undetermined composition underlies Star Lake and is conformably intruded along the contact between the Basic and Intermediate Volcanics. The Intrusive is blunt-nosed at its West end and is nearly | mile wide. It has caused the Basic Tuffs and Rhyolite to trend Northerly at the West end of Star Lake to accomodate the wedge like Intrusion. This Intru sive appears to be following an East, N-East striking Fault that is marked by brecciation and shearing of the Rhyolitic Tuffs jusWNor'th of th'e'^b'asle'Tine at the West end of Star Lake.

A number.of Quartz -.Fjeldspar Porphyry Itykes intrude the Tuffs on both sides of the Star Lake Intrusive along the East, N-East regional shear direction.

The Sheared Intruded Tuffs along the North and South bor ders of the Star Lake Intrusive are favourable sites for gold mineralization.

k!^*J^ ̂ ''•t&jfe

(f: to-

.l;

CHESTER J. KURYLIW, M.Sc., P.Exo.COXMU1.T1NO GCOLCX-.IBT

CONCLUSIONS

The Intrusive under Star Lake that was outlined by the Magnetic Survey is located along an East, N-East Fault and along the contact between the Basic and Intermediate Tuff forma tions. The Tuffs along the perifery of the Intrusive contain numerous Sills of Quartz - Feldspar Porphyry that are mineral-

.

ized with Pyrite. These same Tuffs are also strongly sheared and warped and so are structurally favourable sites for gold deposition.

i

'IS'

CHESTER J. KURYWW, M.Sc., P.Ewo.COXW11.T1NO CEOl**O1*T

RECOMMENDATIONS

It is recommended that one diamond drill hole 300 ft. deep be drilled southwards at -50O along line l Q East col lared at 2 North.

Estimated cost of'D. Drilling(1) Mobilization & Demobilization(2) Contract D. Drilling @ $20. per ft.(3) Engineering 4 Assaying @ $5. per ft.

Total

^2,000.00 $6,000.00 ^1.500.00

$9 500.00

CHESTER J. XUnYJLIW, M.Sc., P.E*o. COMIVLTIMO ceouoonrr

CERTIFICATE

(5)

I, Chester J. Kuryliw of 50 Thunder Drive, Dryden, Ont., do hereby certify that i

(1) I am a Professional Engineer and I am currently employed as a Consulting Geologist for several mining companies.

(2) I am a graduate of i

The University of Manitoba B. Se. Degree, 19^9. The University of Manitoba M.Sc. Degree, 1966.

(3) I am a registered Engineer of the Association of Profes sional Engineers of Ontario and also Manitoba. I am a fellow of the Geologic Association of Canada, also a mem ber of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

I have practiced my profession for over 31 years, most of those years at gold mines, during which time I often plan ned, supervised and directed underground exploration, deve lopment :and. production.

Ky report is based upon a study of the magnetic and Elec tromagnetic survey results on the property, which was car ried out in the field under my supervision. I carried out the Geologic mapping in the field and the plan of Geo logy and interpretations are incorporated in this report.

Dec, 30, 1982 Chester J. Kuryliw, M.Sc.,P.Eng.

i w:

CHESTER J . KURYLIM', M.Sc., P.Ewo.GBOLOO.IBT

:

I

l

52J04SEeei3 52JMS6TO17 ZARN LAKE 02OCHKSTEK J. KUKYLIW

STAR LAKE CLAIM GROUP PATRICIA DISTRICT, N-W ONTARIO

REPORTON

A GROUND MAGNETIC SURVEY

DRYDEN, ONTARIO DEC. 30, 1982

CHESTER J. KURYLIW, M.SC..P.ENG. CONSULTING GEOLOGIST

CnESTKU J. KURYLIW, M.Sc., P.Ewo.COKfULTlNO CCOLOOUrr

INDEX

Title Page

Property, Location and Access

Introduction

Instrument, Unit and Method

General Geology

Results of Magnetic Survey

Conclusions

Recommendations

Certificate

S2J04SEW13 Saje4SEe017 ZARN LAKE 020C

CHESTER J. KURYLrW, M.Sc., P.Eno.

PROPERTY. LOCATION AND ACCESS

'ii: The property consists of a group of six claims over Star Lake and adjoining land. This claim group is located about 12 miles East-South East of the town of Sioux Lookout, Ont. The C.N. branch line from Superior Junction to Thunder Bay passes \ m ile South of the claim group and Hwy. 6**2 from Sioux Lookout is located ^ mile South of the claim group.

Access to the property by boat from a private road that joins Hwy. 6*4-2 with Kirk Lake. Access is also available over land from Hwy. 6^2 along a portage trail.

The Property

The Star Lake claim group consists of six claims.Pa. 59*O06 'Pa. 59*OO?Pa. 59*O08Pa. 59^309Pa. 59*010Pa. 59*O2l

, ".ft::.''"*' '•'~;'.(''.'ft.^ "̂.V; ^; .''i'.'.!*',.

CHESTER J. KURYLIW, M .Bc., P .Ewo. coivnvi.il NO

INTRODUCTION

This claim i?:roup was staked at the end of May. 1982 to cover a high frequency electromagnetic anomaly indicated on the Ontario Geologic Survey's airborne electromagnetic survey map 8055? is sued in May 1982. .

The linecutting was carried out by contractors Adrian and Judy Kuryliw during the last half of December 1982. The grid consists of a North 650 East base line with picket lines running N-250 -W. The picket lines were cut at 400 ft. intervals on the land and the grid lines on the ice were laid out at 200 ft. intervals. The magnetic survey was carried out invthe field by J. Kuryliw in Dec. 1982 under the supervision of this writer. This writer plotted and contoured the results of the survey on the plan accompanying this report. ,

i - -

CHESTER J. KURYLIAV, M.Sc., P.

INSTRUMENT. UNIT AND METHOD

l

Ifej-lft-; -

A Sharpe MF-1 Fluxgate Magnetometer was used to take the readings along the base lines and at 50 ft. station intervals along picket lines. In areas of high variations, readings were taken at 25 ft. intervals and recorded.

The readings were recorded and then were corrected for

diurnal variations and plotted to the nearest half scale divi sion on the most sensitive scale (10 gammas). A magnetic base station was established at 5~E and 0-N on the base line and was arbitrarily established at 600 gammas.

To provide the data for corrections on diurnal variations the following procedures were carried out. The base line was first read and after one hour a check reading was made at the base station, this procedure was repeated until the base line was surveyed. The corrected base line stations were used as alternate check-in stations at the completion of each' set of readings taken along adjoining picket lines to form a loop sys tem.

The corrected readings were plotted on a plan, scale l" = 200 ft. The magnetic readings were then contoured at 200 gamma intervals.

The plotted readings indicatp changes in the vertical com ponent of the earth's magnetic field.

l ?fc

CHKSTER J . KURYLl'W, M.Sc., P.Eno,COXKUl-TINO (IBOLORIHT

GENERAL GEOLOGY

The most recent geologic map covering this area is "Geo logic Compolation Map" No. 2^42 of the Sioux Lookout, Armstrong

Area, scale l" - 4 m5les.The area is underlain by precambrian rocks, which consist

of groups of basic Volcanics and minor Rhyolitic groups of Vol canics. These rocks have been intruded by the large Lake of Bays Batholith to the S-East and the Split Lake Granodiorite

Stock about 4 miles to the N-East.Several known occurrences of precious and base metal miner

alization occur around the Split Lake Stock.

w

IMJ,,

T 7~~ /,jr -'--

CHESTER J. KURYLI'W, M.Sc., P.ENO.COKfUl-TlNO OBOLOOIVT

RESULTS OF MAGNETIC SURVEY

The detailed magnetic survey contoured plan shows a rela tively subdued magnetic relief due largely to the depth of lake

and overburden above bedrock.The Rhyolitic rocks exhibit a magnetic relief in the *4-00 to

800 gamma range. The intermediate to basic Tuffs and Flows ex hibit a relief in the 700 to 1000 gamma range. Under Star Lake the magnetics outline what appears to be an Intrusive that may be a Gabbro or less likely a Granodiorite type of Stock Intru sion. The core of this Intrusive reaches highs of 2,500 gammas.

The correlation between geologic mapping and the magnetic contour pattern coincide well and assists in the projections of formations and it indicates the presence of an Intrusive beneath

the Lake.

l-*.*. - l.

.

lg:

CHESTER J. KUnVLTW, M.Se., P.Eno.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnetic survey proved useful in tracing the trends of the geologically mapped rock formations and it indicates the presence of an interpreted Intrusive below the Lake. There is a good correlation of the magnetic trends with the geologic mapping and this has provided data for an interpretation of

the structural geology.The perifery of the Intrusive under Star Lake is bordered

by intermediate to basic Tuffs that contain numerous Intrusions of Feldspar Porphyry and Quartz Feldspar Porphyry Dykes. This is the belts of high frequency E.K. conductive shears located by the O.G.S. airborne electromagnetic survey. The possibility of gold mineralization in the dyke Intruded Tuffs remains a possibility.

"'^fl^M^' ^^'J0m

CHESTER J. KURYLIW, M.Sc., P. CBOLOCIVT

RECOMMENDATIONS

It is recommended that one diamond drill hole 300 ft.

deep be drilled southwards at -50O along line 18 East col lared at 2 North.

Estimated cost of 'D. Drilling(1) Mobilization ft. Demobilization $2,000.00(2) Contract D. Drilling @ $20. per ft. $6,000.00(3) Engineering k Assaying @ $5. per ft. &1.500.00

Total S9,500.00

CHESTER J. KURVLIW, M.Se.. P.Ewo.

CERTIFICATE

I, Chester J. Kuryliw of 50 Thunder Drive, Dryden, Ont., do hereby certify that*

(l) I am a Professional Engineer and I am currently employed as a Consulting Geologist for several mining companies.

(2) I am a graduate ofi

(3)

The University of Manitoba B.Se. Degree, The University of Manitoba M.Se. Degree,

19^9. 1966.

I am a registered Engineer of the Association of Profes sional Engineers of Ontario and also Manitoba. I am a fellow of the Geologic Association of Canada, also'a mem ber of the Canadian Institute of Mining ind Metallurgy.

I have practiced my profession for over 31 years, most of those years at gold mines, during which time I often plan ned, supervised and directed underground exploration, deve lopment :ancL production.

(5) My report is based upon a study of the magnetic and Elec tromagnetic survey results on the property, which was car ried out in the field under my supervision. I carried out the Geologic mapping in the field and the plan of Geo logy and interpretations are incorporated in this report.

Dec. 30, 1982 Chester J. Ku^UwfHYl.Sc. ,P.Eng,

CHESTER J. KURYL1W, M.Sc., P.E*o. COMM.1.TIMO c ftn.or.nrr

52J04SE8013 52Je4SETO17 ZARN LAKE 030CHESTER J. KURYLIW

STAR LAKE CLAIM GROUP . PATRICIA DISTRICT, N-W ONTARIO

REPORTON

A GROUND ELECTROMAGNETIC (EM-l7) SURVEY

DRYDEN, ONTARIO DEC. 30, 1982

CHESTER J. KURYLIW, M.SC..P.ENG. CONSULTING GEOLOGIST

CHESTER J. KURYL.IW. M.Sc., P.E-o.COKBV1.TIWO OBOVORIBT

INDEX

Title Page

Property, Location and Access

Introduction

Instrument, Unit and Method

General Geology

Results of Electromagnetic (E.M-1?) Survey

Conclusions

Recommendations

Certificate

030C

i-

'JK&2 xf -V

I Ir

If!?

i

CHESTER J. KVRYUW, M.Se., P.E*o.COXVVIT1MO GBOIOCIVT

PROPERTY. LOCATION AND ACCESS

The property consists of a group of six claims over Star Lake and adjoining land. This claim group is located about 12 miles East-South East of the town of Sioux Lookout, Ont. The C.N. branch line from Superior Junction to Thunder Bay

pat.;es \ m ile South of the claim group and Hwy. 6^2 from Sioux Lookout is located ^ mile South of the claim group.

Access to the property by boat from a private road that joins Hwy. 642 with Kirk Lake. Access is also available over land from Hwy. 6*4-2 along a portage trail.

The Property

The Star Lake claim group consists of six claims.Pa. 594306 :.Pa. 594307 , " .tPa. 594308 - ; :Pa. 59*009 : iPa. 59^310Pa. 59^321 - V,

^'i^l^^Ssi^^^^M^^l^^i^W^^^S^'

CHCSTER J. KURYL.l'W. M.Sc., P.Ewo.COKW1.T1HO CCOLOCIVT

INTRODUCTION

This claim group was staked at the end of Kay 1982 to cover a high frequency electromagnetic anomaly indicated on the Ontario

Geologic Survey 'n airborne electromagnetic survey map 80557 is sued in Kay 1982.

The linecutting was carried out by contractors Adrian and Judy Kuryliw during the last half of December 1982. The grid consists of a North 650 East base line with picket lines running N-250 -W. The picket lines were cut at *4-OC ft. intervals on the land and the grid lines on the ice were laid out at 200 ft. in

tervals.The electromagnetic EK-17 survey was carried out in the

field in late Dec. 1982, by Adrian Kuryliw as the receiver oper ator and J. Kuryliw as transmitter operator. This writer super vised the field survey and plotted the results of the horizontal loop survey that was carried out using a 300 ft. coil separation. A plan of the survey scale l " s 200 ft. accompanies this report.

IKSTHUMEHT UNIT AND METHOD

The instrument used was an E-M 17 Electromagnetic

survey unit, the horizontal loop mode of operation vaf used at

300 foot coil separation - ;

The instrument is designed, and manufactured by Geonics

Ltd., 2 Thorncliffe Park Drive, Toronto, Canada.

Basic Principle

The basic principle behind E-M surveying is that

certain orebodies are electrically conductive, and can be

excited electrically by an "applied primary E-M field." The

orebody then produces a "secondary E-M field" which may be

detected above ground.

In the E-M 17 the primary field is produced by the

transmitting coil which is fed an oscillatory current by the

transmitter itself.

The secondary field, together with some primary field

coming directly from the transmitter, is picked up by the

receiving coil and is measured in the receiver console.

Because the secondary field is quite small compared

with the primary it is necessary to "buck out" the primary field

in the receiving coil before making secondary field measurementa.

This is done by means of the reference cable which carries some

of the primary signal directly into the receiver. This signal

also serves as a reference by which the secondary field can be

-7-

f

resolved into its two components, one in-phase (real) and one

out-of phase (imaginary) with the primary, and compared with She

primary in amplitude. The relative strengths of the real prtd

imaginery components are a guide to the conductivity-width product

of the buried conductor, which is usually related to the quantity

of conducting minerals present.

The strength of the secondary field increases aa the

orebody gets larger or more conductive (higher metallic or

electrolytic content). The secondary field is weaker if the

orebody is deeper under the ground or if it is covered by a layer

of absorbing material such as conductive cloy or salt water. By

measuring the strength, character and distribution of the

secondary field on the ground surface, it is possible to locate

conductive orebodies and tell something about their size and nature.

Field Operation

Orientation and Separation^ The HI-1? is a two component

instrument (real and imaginary), also called in phase and out of

phase, as distinct from single-component instruments such as

those that measure dip angle only. This is an advantage as it

enables the user to discriminate more easily between different

types of conductors and to determine more accurately the depth

and shape. The primary field from the transmitter is bucked out

by the compensation circuit for a particular coil separation and

providing the coils are ooplanar.

Choice of Coil Separation

The depth of penetration increases with coil separation.

On the horizontal-loop mode used in this survey the limits of

depth penetration ere in the order of 2/3 the coil separation,

i.e. for conductors buried with 200 feet of overburden a 400

foot coil separation would bo necessary to pick up the conductor.

The background effects of conductive overburden are greater at

larger coil separations. Accuracy with the HI-1? is still good

at a separation of 400 feet though the readings take a little

longer to determine, however, the automatic electronic readout

of the null on the HI-17 eliminates operator errors common to

determining nulls on broad angle nulls common to areas with

conductive overburden.

For steeply dipping conductive bodies the horizontal

or coplanar configuration results in stronger anomalies where

the conductor is buried at a depth of less than one half the

coil separation.

This EM-1? survey was carried out using a horizontal

coil separation of 300 feet over most of the area with some areas

covered at 300 foot coil separation. E-M readings were taken on

stations at 100 foot intervals along lines find the readings are

plotted on plans at the mid point between the coils.

-9-

Figures l, 2, 3a, 4a t 6, 8 are included (next) to

give rule-of-thumb procedures an interpretation.

Such rule-of-thumb procedures should be used with

caution especially when conductive overburden is present*

The Effects of Ground Conductivity;

Ground conductivity usually affects the imaginary

component more than the real. They can produce either positive

or negative effects most commonly negative in the imaginary

and positive in the real component. The profiles produced by

conductive overburden are commonly broad and "wavy" without

distinct shoulders. The anomalies produced are larger at the

larger coil separations and they also tend to be negative at the

larger coil separations.

The Effects of Magnetite;

Magnetite in sufficient quantities at least ?0# of

volume can cause reversal of the real component with little or

no anomaly in the imaginary component. If such a body is also

\Eddy curran!* excited In orebody

Primary field

— - Secondary field

PRINCIPLE OF EM SURVEYING

FIGURE l

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

\

/ Right-200-

Right

Wrong

Wrong

Wrong195-

Imaginary plant

ORIENTATION AND SEPARATION EFFECTS

FIGURE 2

m

VARIATION IN ANOMALY WITH DEPTH

COPLANAR SYSTEM FIGURE 3a

-507olVARIATION IN ANOMALY

WITH DIP

COPLANAR SYSTEM FIGURE 4 o

Reel Component

Imoginory Component

VLF (EM-16)

HORIZONTAL LOOP (EM-17)

l 2 200 ff.

300 ft.

400 ft.

200ft.

EM-17 PROFILES, LOUVICOURT TWP. QUEBEC

FIGURE 6

AXIS

FINDING CONDUCTOR LIMITS

FIGURE 8

CHESTER J. K URYLJ-W, M.Sc., P.E*o.

GENERAL GEOLOGY

m The most recent geologic map covering this area is "Geo logic Coropolation 3/ap" No. 24^2 of the Sioux Lookout, Armstrong Area, scale l" = b m iles.

The area is underlain by precambrian rocks, which consist of groups of basic Volcanics and minor Rhyolitic groups of Vol canics. These rocks have been intruded by the large Lake of Bays Batholith to the S-East and the Split Lake Granodiorite Stock about 4 miles to the N-East.

Several known occurrences of precious and base metal miner alization occur around the Split Lake Stock.

CHESTER J. K.URYL1W, M.Sc., P.Ewo. CONMULTINO croLor.iirr

RESULTS OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY

The EM-17 Electromagnetic survey was carried out using a 300 ft. coil separation in the horizontal mode.

The high frequency conductors located on O.G.S. map 8055V i" "the 1982 airborne electromagnetic survey was not picked up by this lower frequency survey. This indicates that the conductors are very weak and likely represent strongly shear

ed rather than strongly mineralized Sulphide Zones.There is an indication on the imaginary (out of phase) com

ponent of this survey that the sheared and Porphyry Dyke Intru ded Tuffs that border the Intrusive under the Lake are weakly conductive. There is some possibility that the Porphyry Intru ded Tuffs represent a weakly conductive Shear Zone that has some

potential for Gold mineralization that should be tested.

15?':--' X--."l

rCHESTER J. KURYL1W, M.Sc., P.E-o.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some indication that the Sheared and Porphyry Intruded Tuffs that border the Intrusive under the Lake are

weakly conductive.There is some possibility that the Porphyry Intruded Tuffs

represent a weakly conductive Shear Zone that has some poten tial for gold mineralization that should be tested.

CHESTER J. KURVLIW, M.Sc., P.E*o. y e roLOttiirr

RECOMMENDATIONS

It is recommended that one diamond drill hole 300 ft.

deep be drilled southwards at -500 along line 18 East col

lared at 2 North.Estimated cost of'D. Drilling(1) Mobilization & Demobilization $2,000.00

(2) Contract D. Drilling @ $20. per ft. $6,00.0.00(3) Engineering 4 Assaying @ $5. per ft. $l.500.00

Total $9,500.00

CHESTER J. KURYLI'W, M.Sc., P.E-o.

CERTIFICATE

I, Chester J. Kuryliw of 50 Thunder Drive, Dryden, Ont., do hereby certify thati

(1) I am a Professional Engineer and I am currently employed as a Consulting Geologist for several mining companies.

(2) I am a graduate of i

The University of Manitoba B.Se. Degree, 19^9. The University of Manitoba K.Se. Degree, 1966.

(3) I am a registered Engineer of the Association of Profes sional Engineers of Ontario and also Manitoba. I am a fellow of the Geologic Association of Canada, also a mem ber of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

CO I have practiced my profession for over 31 years, most of those years at gold mines, during which time I often plan ned, supervised and directed underground exploration, deve lopment :and. production.

(5) My report is based upon a study of the magnetic and Elec tromagnetic survey results on the property, which was car ried out in the field under my supervision. I carried out the Geologic mapping in the field and the plan of Geo logy and interpretations are incorporated in this report.

Dec. 30, 1982 Chester J. Kuryliw, M.Sc.,P.Eng.

52J04SEM13 52J84SE08t7 ZARN LAKE 900

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAI. TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

o Bg5

T 1

TECHNICS

Type nf Sjirvey^J^^i/^rci-f,

Township or Area /̂0sG

Claim Holr1w{s) S2/-/&S',

CHESTESurvey Cnrnnany ^

O BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT ^L REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC,

/"" 7/^^ff rf2s9{~ Aff**7sf f 4- f^fT^JPfi/ffS} /* A}^3/^. {^^4^06/^1*94-

' -A^ f ^Pj^f^

rtr* j~. AtesS/*)R j. KUSYLIW. M.Sc.. P.ENG.^^.'^.^^^

AnthnrnfRrport *- DRYDEN. ONTARIO

Address of Author ^

Covering Dates of Survey

Total Miles of Line Cut ^

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (include line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

^ r-CM 1\V1 DOT o?^ rnon

(bnecuttin( to office)

DAYS

Geophysical ^— FWrrftmagnefir 4r 0

j —Magnrtnmrter. , &Z& . .

— RaHinmetHr

-Othrr

firnlogiea]

Oenrhemiral

AIRBORNE CREDITS (SpecUl provision credit! do not apply to airborne furvcy.)

Magnetometer Rlertromagnetic . Radiometrir ,/i (enter day i per claim) ^ si ^r . rf

X/

Res. Geo!...Previous Surveys

j^iOthdr of Repo^Dr Ajcnt

Qualifications (n "S ' 1 I ^Cl

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

B37 (5/79)

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

.../S:....................

...u^JL................../?

.^^^..............1(oumber) 1

.^^:^f^z............^9^^e

/S *5??3.rt

ti tt f 2 rt.....3Z&&?;........

RECEIV ED.......................11,11. 'J A lACfik .................

f^NlKlG LANDi SICTION^.,^,.,......

TOTAL CLAIN IS ^

-I

1M ^

1

1a

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Station/A?/^- ~7^ (f-"? JtV j__________Number of Readings

f \ f t ^ S^FerT tS7As± Os* W*6) (^(:D e*J 2 sr) ) Line spacing

Profile srale /?v9?. PfUf/iZ / *~

7 f e} i.- t

Contour interval

U

Zcs

Instrumentf /O

ninrnal rnrrrrtinn mrthorl /?eff T

Station check-in interval (hours)

Base Station location and value .

S* /e+St

37J-

ugzoolb]

Instrument "9 ~S7 *iZfCoil configurationCoil separation _cS Accuracy —- X vv Method: Frequency.

T

D Fixed transmitter D Shoot back D In line D Parallel line

(ipccify V.L.F. tution)

Instrument.Scale constantCorrections made.

01 Base value and

Elevation accuracy.

ioDSu

InstrumentMethod D Time Domain Parameters — On time ———

- Off time ___— Delay time ———— Integration time.

Power.Electrode array.

spacing . Type of electrode

D Frequency Domain — Frequency_____

iWin Hr/o!NaturalResources

Technical Assessment Work Credits

1983 08 10

l 2.5361Mmino lircoitlf 'l Hrpo't

83-24

Recorded Holder

Township or Area *______ZARN LAKE

CHESTER J. KURYLIN

Type of aurvey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Mining Claimi Autued *

Geophytical

Electromagnetic.

Magnetometer.

Radiometric —

45-

I Induced polarization.

Other.________

. dayi

. dayi

. days

.dayi

.dayi

Pa 594306 to 10 Inclusive

594321

Section 77 (19) S*l " Mining Clilmi Aii.tud" column

Geological __________17________ deyi

Geochemical __________________ dayill

m

Man days D

Special provision OD

Airborne D

Ground B

Q Credits have been reduced because o) partial coverage of claims.

Q Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dales and figures of applicant.

;. Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

l No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

:i LJ not tufficiently covered by the survey [j Intuffieient technical data (lied

\, The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on l# each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 60;Geological—-40; Geochemical — 40; Section77(19)—60:

Mtfwitryo)NalinHtabourets

Report of Work(Geop'iyticat. Gt-ologtc*!, Geochemical s'id Expend'tufts)

Tht Mining Act

.- Pteete type e* fwlnt.- H numtwi of mining claim*

*ice*tlt tpaee on thii form, attach a hit. Note: - Only day! credit i calculate! in tlie

"Expenditures" lection may be enteied l" the "Expand, Oayt Ci." eolumni,

-, Do not use shaded areas below.01 SrOTVtyUI

fm Hold*'

C.Addr.it

Townthlp or Aree

Protpactor't Licence No.

Survey Company

Name and Address o* Author (of Oeo-Technicel report)

ate of Survey (from e/ to)

o.', i w. rvTTi s., i i*r i v.Total Mllw of line Cut

At 6. SV 7tf* Df.: Creditt Requested per Each Claim in Columns at fight

l f:

Special Provliloni

For tint lurvey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Airborne Craditi

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Mjgnetometer

- Ridiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

40

Geophyilcal

- Eleciromcgnetlc

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days par Claim

z?Days par

Claim

Days par Claim

Mining Claims Traversed (Lin In numerical sequence)

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)( HMBBBI^^ * KHHBBBH ^WOBWH^V^im^^^^MIMiMIHW^HIHi

Typ* of Work P* r forma d

Performed on Oaimd)

Calculation of Expenditure O*yi Craditi

- Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

SInstructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefix

m

Number

S" f 43 G C,

Expend. Days Cr.

r ' i t

Mining ClaimPrefix

iLEmSEl

g/tmKst.-IAH

IMU

NumberExpand. ?ayi Cr.

.-*

L s

\fi -MININOetVr

;-prtarr

Data

Certification Verifying Repor^f jrVOrkl hereby certify that l have/pe^nal and mii/iie knowledge of the fact* let forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed tame during armor after itt com^lttion and the annextd report li true.

Nima and Pottal Addran of Parion Certifying

rz/z J"- 7^ f 0*1l Date Certified Cert ignaiura)

Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalRe)Murc*i

GeotechnicalReportApproval

Flit

Mining Land* Comments

E To: Geophysics (t*\Comment i

PI With to tt l tgein with correctloni

fo: Geology - ExpendituresCommtnn

fMApprovtd f~| With to xt again with correction!SI0nitur

To: GeochemistryCommtntt

Approved With lo M* tB*in with corrtctloniSlgnitur*

^i, n~|To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)tf,^' u-J

s;1 ', 1663(81/10)- J

imm

1983 01 26 2.5361

mIf L

t l

f lim-

mm-'

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 669Sioux Loakout, OntarioPOV 2TO

Dear Sir:

He . 'e received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) and a Geological Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims PA 594306 et al 1n the Am of Star Lake.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will bf Issued.

He do not have a'copy of the report of work which li nomally filed with you prior to the submission or this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.

Yours very truly,

lE. F. Anderscr.DirectorLand Management BranchWhitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1H3Phone: 416/965-1380 ^DH:sccc: Mr. Chester J. Kuryllw

Dryden, Ontario

i-] w i

p'.f''w

r ;l-'. .r f*ti''

m::,

Ministry tfNaturalResources

\

1983 09 09

Mr. Albert HansonMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 669Sioux Lookout, OntarioPOV 2TO

Dear Sir:

- Your die 2 Z J/? tt (XSj)

'wW/"Q-rQsOurllle 2.5361

RECEIVED21983

S'OUXLOOKpUT

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer)Survey on Mining Claims PA 594306 et al in the Area of Star Lake

If

ll"f;

l;/

pm;:..-SK i- '- 1 ':- 1 : ''

The Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey assessment work credits as listed with my Notice of Intent dated August 10, 1983, have been approved as of the abovedate.

Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.

Yours very truly,

Anderson Director Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450 Queen's Park Toronto,-Ontario M7A 1W3 ' Phone:(416)965-1380

R. Pichette:mc

cc: Chester J. Kuryliw, M.Sc.P.Eng ..Consulting Geologist

: 50 Thunder Drive Dryden, Ontario P8N 1W1

cc: Resident Geologist Sioux Lookout, Ontario

If* 1 '

s**.m

fit-*, :

k -

i!:.1;-;

t'

m-P' t-

^• !. itr

l*ft'-

Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

e 31 f 83Your (ile:

Our file: 2 .53611983 08 10

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 669Sioux Lookout, OntarioPOV 2TO

Dear Sir:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.

For further information, if required, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/965-1380.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316

R. Pichetteisc

cc;

cc: 6.H. FergusonMining i Lands CoraraUsloner Toronto, Ontario

E/icls;

Chester J. Kuryllw, M.Se. P. Eng Consulting Geologist 50 Thunder Drive Dryden t Ontario P8N 1W1

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Notice of Intent

for Technical ReportsOntario

1983 08 10

2.5361

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice, is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

Iti' 1 J&'1 '

846 (82/6)

—*i A.l-il.-

•I

"^v'•' *J

y'j;X

33C

K)OD

•V

12 N

J,V'

s \

\ \ i8N

O O i "l

N X

OO

-N

BA

SE

LIN

E

LE

GE

ND

CENO

ZOIC

PL

EIS

TO

CE

NE

S

R

EC

EN

T

OR

GA

NIC

S - B

OG

S,

MU

SK

EG

o

KA

voC

/LO

OV

ER

BU

RD

EN

-

SA

ND

,CLA

Y,D

ET

R1T

ALS

^

3 45

.

PR

EC

AM

BR

IAN

AC

ID

INT

RU

SIV

ES

13 Q

UA

RT

2-

FE

LD

SP

AR

P

OR

PH

YR

Y

INT

RU

SIV

ES

GA

BB

RO

RH

YO

LIT

IC

RO

CK

S

BA

SIC

T

UF

FS

a

L

AV

AS

I IN

TE

RM

ED

IAT

E

TU

FF

S

B

LA

VA

S

OU

TL

INE

O

F

MU

SK

EG

O

R

SW

AM

P

x,*z*

BO

G

CL

AIM

P

OS

T

LO

CA

TIO

N-* O

UT

LIN

E

OF

R

IDG

E

CR

EE

K

OU

TC

RO

P

-ST

RIK

E a

D

IP

OF

B

ED

DIN

G

'ST

RIK

E

a

DIP

O

F

BE

DD

ING

"'G

EO

LO

GIC

C

ON

TA

CT

-IN

FE

RR

ED

-FA

ULT

MA

GN

ET

IC

CO

NTO

UR

f*5

m

**""

,\ \

4

;.#

l

'p*S

i^'p

tftf

T

^^

.^

m^

7x

/.Si

^

**0G

20

0

S *ls

Of

(N

Ok

/.

ru^r

/.

CH

ES

TE

R

d

KU

RY

LIW

S

TA

R L

AK

E

CLA

IM G

RO

UP

PA

TR

ICIA

M

ININ

G D

IST

RIC

T.

SIO

UX

-LC

HP

LA

N o

fG

EO

LOG

Y

MIC

HA

UD

LA

KE

OO

-N /

BA

SE

L

INE

oon*

Q

MIC

HA

UD

L

AK

E

LEG

EA/D

SY

MB

OLS

OU

T L

me O

F

MU

SK

EG

01

9 S

WA

MP

P0

9T

L

OC

AT

ION

OU

TL

INE

O

F

RID

6E

INS

TR

UM

EN

T'1

SH

AR

PE

M

F-l

FLU

XG

AT

E

MA

GN

ET

OM

ET

ER

SE

NS

ITIV

ITY

- ( )

IO G

AM

MA

SC

HE

ST

ER

J.

K

UR

YLI

W

ST

AR

LA

KE

C

LAIM

G

RO

UP

PA

TR

ICIA

M

ININ

G

DIS

TR

ICT

, S

IOU

X-L

OO

KO

UT

. O

NT.

PL

AN

of

MA

GN

ETI

C

SU

RV

EY

CONT

OUR

INTE

RVAL

: 20

0 GA

MM

AS

LO

CA

TIO

N

MA

P

SC

AL

E-

/*-

4 m

it99

52J04SE0B13 52J04SEIS017 ZARN LAKE

210

MIC

HA

UD

L

AK

E

LEG

EN

DR

EA

L

(IN

-PH

AS

E)

IMA

GIN

AR

Y

(OU

T-O

F-P

HA

SE

)

SY

MB

OLS

OU

TL

INE

O

F

MU

SK

EG

O

R

SW

AM

P

•- C

LA

IM

PO

ST

L

OC

AT

ION

^O

UT

LIN

E

OF

R

IDG

E

INS

TR

UM

EN

T -'

G E

ON

1C S

E

M -

17

HO

DE

: H

OR

IZO

NT

AL

L

OO

P

SU

RV

EY

CO

IL

SE

PA

RA

TIO

N:

30

O'

CH

ES

TER

J.

KU

RY

LIW

S

TAR

LA

KE

C

LAIM

GR

OU

PP

AT

RIC

IA

MIN

ING

D

IST

RIC

T,

SIO

UX

-LO

OK

OU

T.

PL

AN

of

ELE

CTR

OM

AG

NE

TIC

SL

OC

AT

ION

M

AP

S

CA

LE

' l"

' 4

mtt

99S

CA

LE

: f.

20

O'