36
Russell County 2011 Site Visit Presentation

Russell County 2011 Site Visit Presentation. 2008 Baseline 30-Day Use

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Russell County 2011 Site Visit Presentation

  • 2008 Baseline 30-Day Use

    Chart1

    0.4210.272

    Russell

    Kansas

    Sheet1

    RussellKansas

    30-Day Use42.10%27.20%

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • 30-Day Use for 2009*Russell up under 1% from 2008

    *Russell up under 1% from 2008

    Chart1

    0.4240.269

    Russell

    Kansas

    Sheet1

    RussellKansas

    30-Day use42.40%26.90%

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • 30-Day Use for 2010*Russell down 8.5% percent from 2009

    *Russell down 8.5% percent from 2009

    Chart1

    0.3390.2563

    Russell

    Kansas

    Sheet1

    RussellKansas

    30-Day Use33.90%25.63%

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • 30-Day Use for 2011*Russell down 12.5% from 2010 and is lower than state average for first time

    *Russell down 12.5% from 2010 and is lower than state average for first time

    Chart1

    0.2140.2419

    Russell

    Kansas

    Sheet1

    RussellKansas

    30-Day Use21.40%24.19%

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • Russell has the lowest rate of 30-Day Use since the collection of CTC Data

  • Russell exceeds target in 2011Target set by RCCP in 2008: By December 31st, 2011 reduce percentage of 30 day use in 6, 8, 10 12 grades by 12% from a baseline of 42.1% in 2008.Russell actually reduced 30-Day use by 20.7% reduction from baseline with the target at 30%.Russell has exceeded the target by 9.3%.

  • 2008 Baseline Binge Drinking

    Chart1

    0.250.152

    Russell

    Kansas

    Sheet1

    RussellKansas

    Binge Drinking25.00%15.20%

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • 2009 Binge Drinking*Russell increased 4% from 2008

    *Russell increased 4% from 2008

    Chart1

    0.290.147

    Russell

    Kansas

    Sheet1

    RussellKansas

    Binge Drinking29.00%14.70%

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • 2010 Binge Drinking*Russell went down 9.7% from 2009

    *Russell went down 9.7% from 2009

    Chart1

    0.1930.1377

    Russell

    Kansas

    Sheet1

    RussellKansas

    Binge Drinking19.30%13.77%

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • 2011 Binge Drinking*Russell went down 4.9% from 2010

    *Russell went down 4.9% from 2010

    Chart1

    0.1440.1273

    Russell

    Kansas

    Sheet1

    RussellKansas

    Binge Drinking14.40%12.73%

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • Russell has the lowest rate of Binge Drinking since the collection of CTC Data

  • Russell exceeds another target in 2011Target set by RCCP in 2008: By December 31st, 2001 reduce percentage of students report having 5 or more alcoholic drink in a row over the past 2 weeks by 7% from a baseline of 25% in 2008.Russell actually reduced Binge Drinking by 10.6% reduction from baseline with the target at 18%.Russell has exceeded the target by 7.4%.

  • Russell Countys StrategiesSaturation Patrols extra patrols looking for underage drinkingAll Stars prevention program given to all 6th and 7th grade students in Russell County Too Good For Drugs prevention program given to all 1st to 4th grade students in Russell CountyStrengthening Families parenting class

  • Saturation Patrol ObjectivesReduce the number of people drinking in public places such as parks, ball fields and public parking lots therefore reducing underage drinking in those areas by increased police patrolling.Reduce the number of underage drinking at public events where alcohol is present.Increase the youths perceptive of getting caught

  • Target for perception of getting caught

    By December 31st, 2011 decrease the proportion of youth in grades 6, 8, 10, and 12 who report that if a kid drank some beer, wine, or hard liquor in their neighborhood, or the area around where they live, they would not be caught by the police to 40% from a baseline of 28.3% in 2008.

  • Outcomes for perception of getting caught*7370 impacted by this strategy

    *7370 impacted by this strategy

    Chart1

    0.283

    0.306

    0.412

    0.378

    0.4

    Thought they would get caught

    Sheet1

    Thought they would get caught

    200828.30%

    200930.60%

    201041.20%

    201137.80%

    Target40%

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • All Stars Program ObjectivesReduce substance abuse use, including reduced alcohol consumption, binge drinking, cigarette smoking, smokeless tobacco use, marijuana and inhalant use.Prevent and delay the onset of high-risk behaviors such underage drinking, drug use and violence.Help youth see their future and how risky behavior can impact their future goals for themselves.

  • Target for All Stars Program

    By December 31st, 2011 decrease the perceived risk of harm from those 6, 8, 10 and 12 graders who say there is no risk at all if they take one or two drinks of alcohol nearly everyday by 4.2 percentage points from a baseline of 14.2% in 2008.

  • Outcomes for All Stars*161 Impacted by this strategy

    *161 Impacted by this strategy

    Chart1

    0.142

    0.173

    0.113

    0.072

    0.1

    No risk of harm by drinking

    Sheet1

    No risk of harm by drinking

    200814.20%

    200917.30%

    201011.30%

    20117.20%

    Target10.00%

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • Too Good For Drugs Program ObjectivesReducing early onset of risk factors such as underage drinking by education in social and emotional competencies.If kids are reached at an early age that they are too good for drugs and are equipped with the knowledge, skills and attitudes they need then they will more likely to remain alcohol and drug free.

  • Target for Too Good For Drugs Program

    By December 31st, 2011 reduce the percentage of youth in 6th grade who report there is no risk of harming themselves if they take one or two drinks of alcohol nearly every day by 4.7 percentage points from a baseline of 12.7% in 2008.

  • Outcomes for Too Good For Drugs*175 Impacted by this strategy

    *175 Impacted by this strategy

    Chart1

    0.127

    0.222

    0.094

    0.033

    0.08

    No risk of harm by drinking

    Sheet1

    No risk of harm by drinking

    200812.70%

    200922.20%

    20109.40%

    20113.30%

    Target8.00%

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • Strengthening FamiliesProgram ObjectivesDecrease use and intention to use alcohol, tobacco and other drugs. Enhance children's protective and resilience factors by improving children's social and life skills, peer resistance, and communication skills. Improve parent/child attachment and family relations, communication, and organization.

  • Outcomes for Strengthening Families

    Chart1

    0.4

    0.45

    0.33

    0.327

    0.3

    Risk of poor family management

    Sheet1

    Risk of poor family management

    200840.00%

    200945.00%

    201033.00%

    201132.70%

    Target30.00%

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • Continuum of Impact

    Low (Awareness)High(knowledge or behavior change)HighReachAll StarsToo Good For DrugsSaturation PatrolsLow ReachStrengthening Families

  • Number of Programs Delivered

    All Stars has been implemented two times and is currently being implemented for the third time now.Too Good For Drugs has been implemented two times and will be implemented for the third time this school year as well.Strengthening Families has been given two times and will have future classes offered as well.

  • Practice & Policy ChangesIn January of 2009 breathalyzers began to be used at ALL high school dances and 5th Quarters.In August of 2009 USD407 implemented a new Mood Altering Chemicals Policy:Twenty-four hours each day during the season of each activity, a student shall not use or consume, have in possession, buy, sell or give away any beverage containing alcohol, any illegal drug or Controlled substance, tobacco, or any mood altering chemical in any form, including chewing tobacco. Illegal drug or controlled substance does not include such a substance that is legally possessed or used under the supervision of a licensed health care professional or that is legally possessed or used under authority of any federal or state law. However, students are prohibited from trading, selling, or sharing prescription drugs.

    In 2010 and 2011 any events on Main Street involving alcohol were using wrist bands to identify ages of those consuming alcohol. In the past it was just overlooked.

  • Sectors most involvedSchools All Stars, Too Good For Drugs, breathalyzers, coalition involvementLaw Enforcement saturation patrols, involvement with youth and coalition involvementYouth All Stars, Too Good For DrugsMedia newspaper, TV, radio and movie theater

  • Sectors under-utilizedParentsLocal GovernmentHealthcareCivic & Volunteer Groups

  • Community AwarenessReaction to breathalyzers being usedYounger children more awareParents aware of Social Hosting (TV)The way community events are handled Youth are aware of consequences for drinking more

  • Key Leader SupportChief of Police Jon QuindayPrincipals Mr. Walter, Mr. Michel & Mr. BernardSchool Nurse Michelle Van Der WegeSheriff John Fletcher

  • Next StepsFactors contributing to data moving:Fully engaged key leadersFunding for programsCommunity ready for continued changeCommunity support for 5th Quarters

  • Next StepsFactors impeding progress:Having more key leaders in other sectorsFunding will be running outMaking time in elementary schools is getting hardLack of parent involvement

  • Most ProudData

    Responsible drinking at community events

  • Lesson Learned

    Change can be made even when everyone thinks it is impossible!