13
1 Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Design IEEE Meeting August 28, 2007

Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Designewh.ieee.org/conf/hfpp/presentations/112.pdf · 5 AP1000 Development Timeline 1985 -1990 – Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Designewh.ieee.org/conf/hfpp/presentations/112.pdf · 5 AP1000 Development Timeline 1985 -1990 – Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility

1

Safety Cultureand the

AP1000 Plant Design

IEEE Meeting

August 28, 2007

Page 2: Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Designewh.ieee.org/conf/hfpp/presentations/112.pdf · 5 AP1000 Development Timeline 1985 -1990 – Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility

2

Attributes of a Strong Safety Culture●Safety is a clearly recognized value● Leadership for safety is clear●Accountability for safety is clear●Safety is integrated into all activities●Safety is learning driven

The following is a look at how these attributes are evident in the AP1000 plant design and design processes.

Page 3: Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Designewh.ieee.org/conf/hfpp/presentations/112.pdf · 5 AP1000 Development Timeline 1985 -1990 – Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility

3

The Westinghouse AP1000A compact station● 3415 MWt, primary system● 1117 MWe● 2-loops, 2 steam generators

Page 4: Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Designewh.ieee.org/conf/hfpp/presentations/112.pdf · 5 AP1000 Development Timeline 1985 -1990 – Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility

4

AP1000 Passive Safety Systems

Standard PWR AP1000

Page 5: Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Designewh.ieee.org/conf/hfpp/presentations/112.pdf · 5 AP1000 Development Timeline 1985 -1990 – Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility

5

AP1000 Development Timeline● 1985 -1990

– Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility requirements for Advanced Light Water Reactors

– Early AP600 Design and Testing Activities

– NRC adopts Part 52 licensing process

● 1990 - 1999

– AP600 Development and Design Certification

– Utility / DOE program for first of a kind engineering

– Extensive testing of passive safety features

– SSAR and PRA reports submitted to NRC

– Design Certification granted by NRC

● 2000 - present

– AP600 uprated to AP1000 – design / analysis / testing

– Design Certification granted by NRC at end of 2005

– Combined License applications using AP1000 technology

Page 6: Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Designewh.ieee.org/conf/hfpp/presentations/112.pdf · 5 AP1000 Development Timeline 1985 -1990 – Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility

6

Safety is a clearly recognized value

1 x 10-4 5 x 10-5 1 x 10-5

Core Damage Frequency per Year5.1 x 10-7

U. S. NRCRequirements

CurrentPlants

US UtilityRequirements

AP1000Results

Page 7: Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Designewh.ieee.org/conf/hfpp/presentations/112.pdf · 5 AP1000 Development Timeline 1985 -1990 – Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility

7

Leadership for safety is clear● AP1000 Was Developed To Meet

Advanced Light Water Reactor Utility Requirements (ALWR URD)

– Issues were discussed with EPRI ALWR Staff and Utility Staff

– All issues were resolved • Sometimes the design was

changed• Sometimes URD requirements

were changed

Page 8: Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Designewh.ieee.org/conf/hfpp/presentations/112.pdf · 5 AP1000 Development Timeline 1985 -1990 – Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility

8

Accountability for safety is clearU.S. NRC Review of AP600 and AP1000

AP1000 AP600

Level of review Final Design Approval

Final Design Approval

Material submitted for review• Safety Analysis Report • Probabilistic Risk Assessment Report

~ 6500 pages~ 4500 pages

~ 6500 pages~ 4500 pages

Dates of review 2 1/2 years(3/02 – 9/04)

6+ years(6/92 – 9/98)

U.S. NRC review effort• Formal written questions• U.S. NRC meetings• ACRS meetings• U.S. NRC independent safety analysis• U.S. NRC independent tests

31 man-years8202320yesyes

110 man-years740038043yesyes

U.S. NRC Safety Evaluation Report NUREG-1793, 9/04(~2400 pages)

NUREG-1512, 9/98(~2700 pages)

Page 9: Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Designewh.ieee.org/conf/hfpp/presentations/112.pdf · 5 AP1000 Development Timeline 1985 -1990 – Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility

9

Safety is integrated into all activities

V E SS EL S UPP O RT

INS ULA TIO NS UP PO R T

R EM O VA B LEINSU LATIO N

S UPP O RT

P ER MA NE NTCA VITY

S E AL RING

S HIE LD B LO CK

O U TLET VE NTD AM PE R

IN SU LATIO N

T/C

INLET FLO ATBALLS

CO LD LE G

HO T LE G

W ATE R IN

S TEA M / W A TER O UT

Passive Safety Systems

US Licensing Approval

Reduced Components & Commodity Components

Severe Accidents Mitigation Features Short Engineering and

Construction Schedule

Advanced Design Features

Modular Construction

Page 10: Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Designewh.ieee.org/conf/hfpp/presentations/112.pdf · 5 AP1000 Development Timeline 1985 -1990 – Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility

10

Safety is learning drivenAP1000 Design is based on extensive testing

Page 11: Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Designewh.ieee.org/conf/hfpp/presentations/112.pdf · 5 AP1000 Development Timeline 1985 -1990 – Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility

11

Safety is learning driven

● Reactor Vessel– Materials lessons learned– No bottom-mounted instrumentation

● Steam Generators– Inconel 690 TT tubes– Stainless steel support plates

● Reactor Coolant Pumps– Canned motor pumps, no shaft seals

● Pressurizer– About 50% larger than operating plants

● Simplified Main Loop– Reduces welds 50%, supports 80%– All piping above reactor core

Page 12: Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Designewh.ieee.org/conf/hfpp/presentations/112.pdf · 5 AP1000 Development Timeline 1985 -1990 – Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility

12

Leadership for safety is clearAP1000 Design Certification Received From NRC 12/30/05

Page 13: Safety Culture and the AP1000 Plant Designewh.ieee.org/conf/hfpp/presentations/112.pdf · 5 AP1000 Development Timeline 1985 -1990 – Industry program led by EPRI to establish utility

13

Attributes of a Strong Safety Culture●Safety is a clearly recognized value● Leadership for safety is clear●Accountability for safety is clear●Safety is integrated into all activities●Safety is learning driven

Conclusion – there is ample evidence that the strong nuclear industry safety culture has served the AP1000 design development process well.