Sarris_et_al._2004_JAS_Geophysical Prospection and Soil Chemistry at the Early Copper

  • Upload
    chersos

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Sarris_et_al._2004_JAS_Geophysical Prospection and Soil Chemistry at the Early Copper

    1/13

    Geophysical prospection and soil chemistry at the Early Copper

    Age settlement of Veszto-Bikeri, Southeastern Hungary

    Apostolos Sarrisa, Michael L. Galatyb, Richard W. Yerkesc*, William A. Parkinsond,Attila Gyuchae, Doc M. Billingsleyb, Robert Tatec

    aLaboratory of Geophysical-Satellite Remote Sensing and Archaeo-Environment, Institute for Mediterranean Studies, Foundation of Research and

    Technology, Hellas (F.O.R.T.H.), Rethymno, Crete, GreecebDepartment of Sociology/Anthropology, Millsaps College, 1701 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39210-0001, USA

    cDepartment of Anthropology, Ohio State University, 245 Lord Hall, 124 West 17th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1394, USAdDepartment of Anthropology, Florida State University, 1847 West Tennessee Street, Tallahassee, FL 32304-3359, USA

    e

    Munkacsy Mihaly Muzeum, Bekescsaba, Hungary

    Received 21 October 2003; received in revised form 23 November 2003; accepted 1 December 2003

    Abstract

    Geophysical prospection and soil chemical analyses were conducted at the Early Copper Age (ECA, ca. 45003900 cal BC

    [Antiquity 76 (2002) 619, Journal of Field Archaeology (2004) in press] site of Veszto-Bikeri as part of the Koros Regional

    Archaeological Project investigations of the NeolithicCopper Age transition on the Great Hungarian Plain. The goal of these

    investigations was to locate and map subsurface features and activity areas at the settlement. Vertical magnetic gradient

    measurements defined the extent and layout of the structures and features across the settlement and revealed that previously

    unidentified concentric ditches enclosed the site. Excavations confirmed the locations of most of the wall trenches, postholes, ditches,

    and pits detected in the geophysical survey. The soil chemical survey recorded high concentrations of phosphate around theperimeter of the site, some of which were associated with a midden. With the geophysical survey, details of the plan and organization

    of the Early Copper Age settlement were revealed that could not be discerned from surface artifact distribution patterns and test

    excavations. The soil chemistry survey results showed a contrast between the cleaner center of the site (near the structures) and

    the ring of debris at the edge of the site (near the circular enclosures). The continuation of such nondestructive investigations at other

    ECA sites will help improve models of settlement organization during the NeolithicCopper Age transition.

    2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

    Keywords: Hungary; Copper Age; Remote sensing; Geophysical survey; Soil chemistry

    1. Introduction

    Nondestructive geophysical surveys can detect sub-

    surface features such as pits, middens, walls, foun-

    dations, ditches, hearths, kilns, animal pens, pottery

    concentrations and burned structures [1,25,29]. This is

    done by measuring the physical properties of soils such

    as their magnetic susceptibility or electrical resistance on

    or below the surface, and by recording concentrations of

    chemicals such as phosphorus, nitrogen, calcium, and

    carbon in the soil [1,35,11,18,25,26,2830].Soil resistance techniques can be used to identify

    walls, ditches, and other features that contrast with the

    surrounding soil matrix in porosity, density, and water

    content. Magnetic methods are best suited for finding

    features that contrast with the surrounding soils in the

    concentration of the magnetic minerals they contain.

    Features such as pits, wall trenches, hearths, kilns,

    burned soils, habitation structures, and ditches filled

    with organic remains alter the magnetic susceptibility of

    the soil and are good targets for magnetic surveys.

    Magnetic surveying techniques have been used to

    locate and map buried features at several Neolithic and

    * Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-614-292-1328;

    fax: +1-614-292-4155

    E-mail address: [email protected] (R.W. Yerkes).

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    Journal of Archaeological Science 00 (2004) 113

    SCIENCE

    Journal of

    Archaeological

    http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas

    SCIENCE

    Journal of

    Archaeological

    http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas

    0305-4403/04/$ - see front matter 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

    doi:10.1016/j.jas.2003.12.007

  • 7/29/2019 Sarris_et_al._2004_JAS_Geophysical Prospection and Soil Chemistry at the Early Copper

    2/13

    Bronze Age settlements in Southeastern Europe

    [2,9,17,26]. At Veszto-Bikeri (Figs. 1 and 2), controlled

    surface collections and test excavations indicated that

    burned wattle-and-daub structures, circular pits, and

    wall trench features were present, but the layout and

    extent of these features was not clear [22,23]. Thus, it

    was decided that magnetic prospection techniques

    should be employed to record subsurface features and

    activity areas, given the geomorphological context of the

    low hill where this Early Copper Age (ECA) settlementwas located and the expected subsurface targets

    [2123,25]. A high-resolution magnetic survey covering

    over 5000 m2 of the area surrounding the central exca-

    vation blocks (Fig. 2), was conducted in the period of

    June 30July 3, 2002 [25,29].

    Also in summer 2002 an Oakfield soil probe was used

    to collect soil samples at 10 m intervals within a 9400 m2

    grid at the center of the site and from transects extending

    100 m east and 100 m south of the site (Fig. 3, [4]). These

    samples were analyzed for levels of Molybdate Reactive

    Phosphorous (MRP) using the methods described by

    Murphy and Riley [20]. The pattern of phosphate con-

    centration in the soil provided information on site

    activities and organization that complemented the

    results of the magnetic survey. Undergraduate field

    school students were active participants in both phases

    of these remote sensing investigations.

    2. The Veszto-Bikeri Site

    The Koros Regional Archaeological Project was

    initiated to study Early Copper Age (ECA) settlementorganization, land use, and subsistence on the Great

    Hungarian Plain [2123]. In 2000, Hungarian and

    American archaeologists and students tested the ECA

    Tiszapolgar Culture settlement at Veszto-Bikeri. This

    site is located just south of the well-known tell site of

    Veszto-Magor [7,12]. Veszto-Bikeri sits on a low hill

    overlooking an old channel of the Koros River near the

    modern town of Veszto, Hungary (Figs. 1 and 2).

    Unlike most shallow Tiszapolgar settlements where

    cultural deposits were destroyed by modern plowing

    [6,7,10,13,14,21], the surface materials at Veszto-

    Bikeri retained their spatial integrity, suggesting that

    N

    0 100 km20050

    Krs r.

    Veszto-Bikeri

    x

    Fig. 1. Map of the Carpathian Basin showing the location of Veszto-Bikeri.

    A. Sarris et al. / Journal of Archaeological Science 00 (2004) 1132

  • 7/29/2019 Sarris_et_al._2004_JAS_Geophysical Prospection and Soil Chemistry at the Early Copper

    3/13

    sub-surface features remained intact [22,23]. The 2000

    test excavations confirmed this, and parts of threewattle-and-daub structures were exposed in three

    22 m units (the fourth test unit penetrated a midden at

    the southern edge of the site). In 2001, larger block

    excavations in the central area of the site uncovered the

    dirt floors of two of these structures (Features 4 and 5).

    The structures had been burned and leveled by the

    Tiszapolgar inhabitants, and are marked by layers of

    daub fragments in a clay matrix overlying a thin clayey

    silt floor deposit that contains small flecks of burnt

    daub, ECA ceramics, burnt bone, lithic artifacts, and

    flecks of charcoal. In one of the structures (Feature 4)

    some flat-lying sherds and a burned and crushed

    Tiszapolgar vessel were found at the interface between

    the daub layer and the top of the floor deposit. With theexception of an intrusive Hungarian Conquest period

    burial (10th century AD), all material that was found in

    and around the structures dates to the ECA Tiszapolgar

    Culture [22,23]. The 2001 field school excavations pro-

    vided information about the use and destruction of the

    wattle-and-daub structures, but no traces of their walls

    or interior posts were encountered. It was not clear if

    these structures were small, freestanding houses, or if

    they were rooms that were part of larger longhouse

    structures [7,12,22,23].

    Some of the architectural features of the structures in

    the central area of the site were revealed during the 2002

    Fig. 2. Contour map showing the topography of Veszto-Bikeri and excavation blocks from the 20002002 seasons. Contour lines represent 10 cmintervals.

    A. Sarris et al. / Journal of Archaeological Science 00 (2004) 113 3

  • 7/29/2019 Sarris_et_al._2004_JAS_Geophysical Prospection and Soil Chemistry at the Early Copper

    4/13

    field season. A burned structure (Feature 14) was un-

    covered just east of Feature 4, and we exposed a large

    wall trench that ran along the northern edge of both

    Feature 4 and Feature 14. Another large wall trench was

    uncovered running along the western edge of Feature 4,

    and some deep pits at the corners of the wall trenches

    were excavated, but no internal postholes, hearths,

    ovens, or kilns were found inside of the wall trenches.

    The form and extent of these wattle-and-daub structures

    and the location and layout of features associated with

    the structures was still not clear, so the magnetic and soil

    chemistry surveys were undertaken in order to locate

    and map all of the structures, features, and activity areas

    at Veszto-Bikeri.

    3. Magnetic prospection methods

    Magnetic measurements deal with anomalies or

    alterations of the earths uniform geomagnetic field.

    Subsurface targets with magnetic properties different

    from those of the surrounding soil matrix change the

    local magnetic field and create an anomaly in the

    measurements. The magnetic anomalies are directly

    related to the magnetic susceptibility of the soil or

    Fig. 3. Map showing the location of phosphate samples (black dots), their relative values, and excavations blocks from the 20002002 seasons atVeszto-Bikeri. Higher phosphate values are represented by darker colors, lower values are indicated by lighter colors.

    A. Sarris et al. / Journal of Archaeological Science 00 (2004) 1134

  • 7/29/2019 Sarris_et_al._2004_JAS_Geophysical Prospection and Soil Chemistry at the Early Copper

    5/13

    feature. Areas with enhanced magnetic susceptibility

    (with respect to the surrounding soil matrix) are

    measured as positive anomalies, while areas with lowerconcentrations of ferrous oxides (and reduced magnetic

    susceptibility) are represented as negative magnetic

    anomalies. Features such as pits, wall trenches, burned

    soils, structures, and ditches have a different magnetic

    susceptibility than the surrounding soil matrix. These

    features are usually characterized by an increase in

    susceptibility, which creates a weak magnetic field and

    alters the local magnetic field [1,26,30].

    Proton or caesium magnetometers are used to

    measure total magnetic field strength, while proton,

    caesium, or fluxgate gradiometers are used to measure

    the vertical or horizontal gradient of the total magneticfield or one of its components. At Veszto-Bikeri, a

    Geoscan FM36 Fluxgate Gradiometer was used to

    measure the vertical gradient of the local magnetic field,

    namely the difference of the vertical component of the

    magnetic field at two different heights. The two gradi-

    ometer sensors (spaced 0.5 m apart) are very sensitive to

    anomalies up to 1.5 m below the surface. The instrument

    is able to read the vertical gradient of the magnetic field

    with an accuracy of 0.1 nT/m. The magnetic survey was

    conducted by walking from South to North along 0.5 m

    spaced transects and taking measurements every 0.5 m

    or 0.25 m (Fig. 4).

    3.1. Magnetic data processing procedures

    The magnetic data did not need to be corrected fordiurnal variations of the earths magnetic field, but all

    data were characterized by a constant shift of the

    average value within each survey grid. This was due to

    the shifting of base/reference stations and the balancing

    of the instrument. Pre-processing of the raw data was

    necessary so that there would be a common base level

    (0-level base line) for all survey grids. Each day, the raw

    data were entered into a laptop PC and each data set

    was coded by a survey grid number and given the

    appropriate coordinates within the site grid system.

    Statistical analysis of the common rows between

    adjacent survey grids and the average level of theseadjacent grids were calculated in order to provide a

    correction factor for each new grid.

    A kriging interpolator with a linear variogram was

    used to produce a grid of the magnetic data and to

    produce contour and gray scale maps of the survey

    results. Selective despiking techniques were used in some

    cases to isolate the extreme values that masked the

    anomalies of interest. Selective compression of the

    dynamic range of values was also employed to isolate

    anomalies close to the background level. A mask file was

    created to isolate the central excavation blocks where

    magnetic survey was not conducted (Fig. 5). High-pass

    Fig. 4. Photograph of Apostolos Sa rris collecting magnetometric data at Veszto-Bikeri in July, 2002.

    A. Sarris et al. / Journal of Archaeological Science 00 (2004) 113 5

  • 7/29/2019 Sarris_et_al._2004_JAS_Geophysical Prospection and Soil Chemistry at the Early Copper

    6/13

    (gradient) filters and the calculation of first horizontal

    derivatives helped emphasize the high frequency compo-nents of the geophysical maps. Interpretation maps were

    made based on the features that were identified as the

    data were processed. Both color and gray scale geo-

    physical maps were produced. Hot colors (red shades) in

    color maps and light (white) colors in gray scale maps

    represent areas of high (positive) magnetic intensity.

    Cold colors (blue shades) and dark (black) colors

    represent low intensity anomalies [25].

    4. Results of the geophysical survey

    The mosaic of geophysical grids measured at 0.5 m

    intervals showed a systematic drift, which was especially

    evident in the western and southern edges of the settle-

    ment (Fig. 5), but some subtle anomalies are present inthe central area. When the data were rectified to the

    0-level base line, the concentric curvilinear features at

    the site margin and the rectangular wall trench struc-

    tures in the central area are more clearly delineated. The

    0-level base line rectification is generally used to remove

    the drift of the measurements along the traverses. Even

    better resolution was obtained by re-surveying sections

    of the site at a 0.25 m interval (Fig. 5). When this was

    done, the boundaries of the circular and rectangular

    features are sharper and other anomalies could also be

    defined. These methods produced a regular pattern of

    anomalies that revealed the layout of the subsurface

    Fig. 5. Synthetic image of the rectified data resulting from the 0.5 m and 0.25 m sampling interval at Veszto-Bikeri.

    A. Sarris et al. / Journal of Archaeological Science 00 (2004) 1136

  • 7/29/2019 Sarris_et_al._2004_JAS_Geophysical Prospection and Soil Chemistry at the Early Copper

    7/13

    features at the site even though there were no visible

    traces of these circular enclosures or rectangular wall

    trench features on the modern ground surface.

    The geophysical signature of the circular enclosures

    indicated that they were concentric ditches [25,29]. Mag-

    netic data indicated that the diameter of the inner ditch

    is approximately 65 m and the outer ditch is about

    75 m. The non-uniform magnetic signature of these

    circular features suggested that there were postholes

    within the trenches. The inner ditch was better

    defined, probably because it was deeper. While the

    ditches seem to encircle the settlement, their magnetic

    signal is weaker in the west and southwest (Figs. 5 and 6)

    where they may have been partly eroded through

    cultivation or periodic flooding of the channel, which

    flows nearby. The extremely low (dark) anomaly in the

    northeastern corner of Fig. 5 that interrupts the ditches

    was caused by the long steel rod that was set in the

    ground at the datum point where the total station is

    setup.

    Fig. 6. Diagrammatic representation of magnetometric anomalies at Veszto-Bikeri. Interpretation of magnetometric anomalies: A1A11architectural remains; A12A13possible architectural remains; B1, B3, B4, B15metal anomalies (probably modern); B16, B17, B18, B20,B21pits or hearths; B6, B8, B9, B10possible pits or hearths; B2, B7, B12, B23possible pits; B14possible kiln or oven; C1, C3anomaliesassociated with ditches; C2anomaly possibly associated with flooding of canal.

    A. Sarris et al. / Journal of Archaeological Science 00 (2004) 113 7

  • 7/29/2019 Sarris_et_al._2004_JAS_Geophysical Prospection and Soil Chemistry at the Early Copper

    8/13

    4.1. Confirmation of the circular ditches

    Two long trenches were laid out in 2002 to bisect the

    ditches and establish ground truth for the features

    (Block 5 was 15 m1 m and Block 6 was 10 m1 m, see

    Fig. 2). Excavations confirmed that the inner and outer

    ditches were located exactly where they were mappedduring the geophysical survey. As predicted, several

    postholes were exposed within the inner, deeper ditch

    (Fig. 7). In the two long excavation trenches, segments

    of this inner ditch were 0.8 m wide and extended up to

    1.3 m below the present surface, and as much as 0.65 m

    below the base of the plow zone. The postholes within

    the inner ditch range in diameter from 0.2 to 0.3 m and

    extend another 0.5 m beneath the bottom of the trenches

    (1.551.8 m below the surface). The postholes were

    placed relatively close together, suggesting that they may

    have been associated with a substantial palisade (exca-

    vation of a 10 m20 m block in the southeast corner

    of the site during the 2003 summer field school

    exposed more of the circular ditches and postholes in the

    locations predicted by the geophysical survey). The

    outer ditch is irregular, 0.60.8 m wide, and was cut to

    depth about 1.0 m below the present ground surface.

    No obvious postholes were found in the 1-m segments of

    the outer ditch exposed in the two long excavation

    blocks. A third, narrow, shallow ditch was exposed

    midway between the inner and outer ditches (Fig. 7).

    The fact that this ditch was so narrow and shallow,

    and contained few artifacts and no burned daub,

    explains why it was not detected in the magnetic

    survey. Both the inner and outer ditches containedsome Tiszapolgar ceramics, burned daub, bone, char-

    coal, and shell. The artifact density in the trenches is

    much lower than what was found in the wall trenches

    and structures in the center of the settlement, but

    only ECA artifacts were found in the ditch fill. Radio-

    carbon assays on charcoal in the ditches provided

    dates that are contemporary with other carbon-14

    samples from the site, and all date to the Early Copper

    Age [23].

    4.2. Rectangular structures

    Processing and filtering of the magnetic data allowed

    us to define portions of at least eleven rectangular

    structures in the central area of the site (A1A11 on Fig.

    6). The enhanced magnetic signal associated with these

    architectural features is due to the presence of burned

    daub and artifacts in the fill of the wall trenches, as well

    as the depth and width of these linear features. The

    isolated low (light) magnetic anomalies within the wall

    trenches are related to the traces left by postholes [25].

    Short segments of the wall trenches associated with

    anomaly A1 were exposed in Block 1, a 22 m test unit

    excavated in 2000 [22,23]. This structure (A1) is about

    10 m long (NS) and 5 m wide (EW). A smaller

    structure (A2) measuring 43 m lies off the SW corner

    of anomaly A1 [25].

    Anomaly A3 was located just west of the central

    excavation block (Fig. 6). The eastwest linear feature

    along the northern edge of this anomaly lines up with

    the wall trench exposed along the N439490 grid line inthe Block 2 excavations (excavation of an 8 m12 m

    block west of Block 2 during the summer of 2003

    exposed large wall trenches in the exact locations where

    the linear anomalies were recorded during the magnetic

    survey. This long trench is either the north wall of a

    large compound that contains two freestanding

    structures (Features 4 and 14), or the wall of a long-

    house with two large rooms [22,23]). Anomaly A3 also

    includes linear features that seem to represent the west-

    ern and southern walls of the longhouse (excavation

    o f t h e 8 m12 m block west of Block 2 in 2003

    confirmed this). A smaller square structure measuring33 m was identified adjacent to the north wall of

    anomaly A3 (Fig. 6). The other architectural anomalies

    (A5, A6, A7, A8, A10, and A11) form a tight arc

    around the central excavation blocks (Fig. 6). None of

    the linear features mapped by the magnetometer

    survey overlap, and our excavations suggest that

    while all of the structures at Veszto-Bikeri probably

    were not inhabited or used at the same time, they were

    all built or modified during a continuous occupation

    episode.

    4.3. Possible pits, kilns, or hearths

    Several isolated circular anomalies have an NS axis

    of symmetry that indicates that they were caused by the

    presence of metal objects in the soil (B1 and B3 on Fig.

    6). The high magnetic gradient anomaly (>250 nT/m)

    identified at B15 was caused by a large metal fragment,

    which masked an area of more than 44 m on the grid.

    Anomaly B5 has a similar magnetic signature, and the

    original high magnetic values near A6 also suggest the

    presence of a metal fragment. In contrast, the lower

    values of the vertical magnetic gradient (up to 30 nT/m)

    in the area of B14 suggest that this anomaly mayrepresent a kiln, oven, or large hearth (excavations at

    this location in summer 2003 revealed a series of super-

    imposed thermal features that may be kilns or ovens).

    Lower values (up to 7 nT/m) were recorded for mono-

    pole anomalies B16, B17, B18, B19, B20, and B21, which

    are all located slightly down slope along the western

    edge of the feature concentration in the center of the site

    (Fig. 6). These may be the geophysical signatures for a

    series of smaller hearths, kilns, or ovens [25]. Anomalies

    along the eastern edge of the central feature cluster

    (B6, B8, B9, B10, B11, and B13) may identify similar

    features.

    A. Sarris et al. / Journal of Archaeological Science 00 (2004) 1138

  • 7/29/2019 Sarris_et_al._2004_JAS_Geophysical Prospection and Soil Chemistry at the Early Copper

    9/13

    Fig. 7. Photograph (A), plan (B), and profile (B) of Block 5 at the end of the 2002 season, showing the ditches that correspond to circular magneto

  • 7/29/2019 Sarris_et_al._2004_JAS_Geophysical Prospection and Soil Chemistry at the Early Copper

    10/13

    4.4. Settlement layout and organization

    A few isolated anomalies lie outside of the central

    cluster (Fig. 6). Several of these (B2, B7, B12, B22, and

    B23) are located within the inner and outer circular

    ditches, and two of them (B7 and B12) may be related to

    discontinuities or entrances. Anomaly C3 near B7 mayalso mark an entranceway through the circular enclo-

    sures [25]. Excavations will be undertaken during future

    field seasons to determine what kinds of features are

    located in the eastern and western arcs around the

    central structures.

    The signatures of the anomalies identified as A12

    and A13 are not as distinctive. They are located near

    (west of) a portion of the Veszto-Bikeri site where

    human remains were found on the surface [21]. None the

    less, the magnetometry survey revealed that there is a

    dense concentration of anomalies at the center of the

    site, and parts of several of these features were exposed

    in the 2000, 2001, and 2002 excavations. While the

    distribution of burned daub and artifacts on the surface

    showed us where to find the rectangular structures

    [22,23], there was no visible trace of the concentric,

    circular ditches. The identification of these features

    during the magnetic survey changed our interpretation

    of the site. Bognar-Kutzian [7] had suggested that pali-

    sades and defensive features became superfluous dur-

    ing the Early Copper Age. This was a time when she

    believed more peaceful conditions prevailed and there

    were widespread interactions across the Great Hungar-

    ian Plain. The triple enclosure around Veszto-Bikeri

    suggests that times may not have been so peaceful afterall. Small portions of trenches or ditches have been

    exposed at the handful of Tiszapolgar settlements

    that have been partially excavated [7,21], but at Veszto-

    Bikeri we have the first evidence that the entire settle-

    ment was enclosed. We plan to employ geophysical

    survey at other ECA sites to determine if concentric

    circular ditches are present there as well.

    The magnetic survey also revealed rectangular

    anomalies (structures) in a dense cluster at the center of

    the area encircled by the concentric ditches. The area

    immediately surrounding the structures contains

    anomalies that may represent kilns, ovens, hearths, orpits. Between the structures (and other features) at the

    center of the settlement and the ditches surrounding

    the settlement, there are relatively fewer magnetic

    anomalies, suggesting that the area between the ditches

    and the structures may have been free of subsurface

    features and may have been used for keeping

    domesticated animals and dumping trash (see below).

    5. Soil chemistry survey at Veszto-Bikeri

    The soil chemistry survey conducted by Doc Billingsley

    and Michael Galaty [4] provided complementary

    information about the layout and organization of the

    Veszto-Bikeri site. Soil analysis provides information

    about the chemical composition of anthropic soils at the

    microscopic and elemental levels. Residues left over

    from human activities or as byproducts of human occu-

    pation may remain as chemical traces in soils, providing

    evidence of human activity even when the artifactsassociated with these activities been cleaned up and

    removed [18,19,27].

    One of the most archaeologically significant compo-

    nents of soil chemistry is the analysis of phosphorus, an

    element that leaches from bones and organic tissues and

    concentrates in locations where organic materials were

    left to decay. In its phosphate ion form, phosphorus

    becomes a relatively immobile compound in soils

    (especially clays) and relative concentrations of phos-

    phate in the soils at a site can be used to distinguish

    between clean living and working areas, and locations

    such as middens, dumps, stalls, and pastures where

    organic residues were concentrated [3,8,18,19,24,27].

    Soil chemistry survey is another nondestructive method

    of data collection, and laboratory analysis of the

    samples of sediment relies on inexpensive, simple, low-

    hazard methods of chemical extraction and colorimetric

    techniques [15,18,20].

    Since Veszto-Bikeri is a single component ECA site

    [22,23], interpretations of soil survey data are simplified

    since most of the features at the site can be attributed to

    the Tiszapolgar occupation. As noted above, geophysi-

    cal prospection, surface collections, and previous exca-

    vations showed that the site consisted of a central cluster

    of large compounds or longhouse structures made ofwattle-and-daub. Magnetic signatures for kilns, ovens,

    hearths and pits were mapped just outside of the central

    cluster. An open space separated this central living area

    from a midden ring or dumping zone that was enclosed

    by a triple ring of concentric ditches and palisades.

    Preliminary analyses of the faunal and floral remains

    showed that the ECA inhabitants of Veszto-Bikeri

    hunted, fished, and collected wild plants, and also raised

    domesticated plants and animals (including barley,

    wheat, sheep, goats, pigs, and cattle [21,23]. Soil survey

    data was examined, and areas of high phosphorus

    concentration were found outside of the central livingarea, suggesting the presence of animal pens or middens

    where large quantities of organic waste materials would

    have leaked phosphates into the soil.

    5.1. Field sampling methods

    Soil chemistry survey was conducted by collecting

    samples at 10 m intervals along an 8080 m grid over

    the site (Fig. 3). Additional samples were collected along

    two 100 m transects that extended east and south

    beyond the site limits. In addition, nine control points

    were sampled to establish the natural background levels

    A. Sarris et al. / Journal of Archaeological Science 00 (2004) 11310

  • 7/29/2019 Sarris_et_al._2004_JAS_Geophysical Prospection and Soil Chemistry at the Early Copper

    11/13

    of phosphorus to be expected in the area near the site [4].

    At each 10 m grid point (or control point) soil was

    extracted from the buried cultural layer 0.450.50 m

    below the surface using an Oakfield coring device. A

    second soil sample was taken from a shallower depth

    (0.150.20 m bs) at each point to test for modern

    disturbances. The two 5 cm soil core segments weretaken from the sampling tube at the desired depths and

    collected in sterilized twist-and-seal Whirlpak bags.

    5.2. Laboratory methods

    The quantifiable colorimetric analysis of available

    Molybdate Reactive Phosphorus (MRP) content in each

    soil sample was accomplished using a modification of

    the methods outlined by Murphy and Riley [20]. This

    method provides for the determination of extractable

    particulate phosphorous (MRP) in soil samples using a

    single solution. As directed by the Murphy and Riley

    method [20], a mixed reagent consisting of 5 N sulphuricacid, ammonium molybdate, 0.1 M ascorbic acid, and

    potassium antimonyl tartrate was prepared. Six-ml por-

    tions of this solution were added to labeled test tubes,

    each containing 1 g of pulverized and dried soil, and

    stirred to promote solution of the soluble portion of the

    sample. After a minimum of 20 min the test tubes were

    centrifuged and a 5 ml aliquot of the bluish decantate

    was transferred to a test tube specially calibrated for use

    in a Beckman Spectrocolorimeter (Spec-20). This photo-

    metric test tube was diluted to 10 ml with distilled,

    de-ionized water and agitated to promote homogenous

    color diffusion. The photometric test tube was placed inthe Spec-20 colorimeter and the light transmittance and

    absorbance at 800 nm was measured and recorded. The

    values returned are standardized and quantified, as they

    are reported using a Spec-20 colorimeter. The data

    attained from laboratory analysis were entered into

    spreadsheets for further interpretation.

    6. Results and interpretation

    The extractable phosphorous (MRP) values at the

    sample points on the site grid were used to create

    contour maps (Fig. 3) [8]. The areas with the highestMRP levels are located at the perimeter of the site, while

    consistently low levels were found in the central area

    of the site. This pattern is consistent with the model

    for agricultural settlements where residents removed

    organic waste (high in phosphates) from living quarters

    and deposited their trash in ring middens at the

    perimeter of the site [16]. The low MRP levels in the area

    around the central structures indicates that organic

    waste was not a constituent of the daub that covered the

    walls of these structures [4].

    However, higher levels of MRP were also recorded in

    the area where possible kilns, ovens, pits, or hearths

    were mapped during the magnetic survey (Fig. 6,

    anomalies B9, B10, B16, B17, B18, B19, B20, B21). The

    extractable phosphorus (MRP) levels near these prob-

    able cooking and food storage features were higher than

    the levels in and near the structures, but lower than the

    levels at the perimeter of the site. This suggests that not

    as much organic refuse accumulated near these features.The highest MRP levels or hot spots at the perimeter

    of the site where no features have been identified may

    indicate that domesticated livestock were kept at these

    locations [8,27]. Further excavations are needed to

    confirm these hypotheses.

    6.1. The southern and eastern transects

    Extractable phosphorus (MRP) levels were also

    recorded in the two transects extending 100 m east and

    south of the site to establish settlement boundaries and

    provide additional background values. In the south

    transect for the entire 100 m, MRP levels drop to withinthe natural background values that were established

    using the random samples that were collected away from

    the site (see above). This establishes the southern bound-

    ary of the settlement at the line of concentric ditches and

    also implies that modern agricultural practices have not

    affected the background levels of MRP. The eastern

    transect contains several points within these natural

    background limits, however, approximately 55 m east of

    the outer circular ditch (grid point 664190) east and

    extending 70 m to the end of the transect (at grid point

    E664260), extractable phosphorous (MRP) rises to

    levels similar to the highest concentrations found at theperimeter of Veszto-Bikeri (Fig. 3). However, since only

    modern debris is found on the surface here, and no

    Neolithic or Copper Age sites were recorded at this

    location during the Hungarian pedestrian surveys

    [7,10,13,14], the high MRP values here are probably

    associated with recent farming activities.

    7. Conclusions

    Nondestructive geophysical prospection and soil

    chemical analysis at the site of Veszto-Bikeri provided

    new data that have helped us reconstruct the layout andorganization of a small dispersed agricultural settlement.

    Controlled surface collections and test excavations

    established the integrity of the site and the fact that

    it was only occupied during the early Copper Age

    (Tiszapolgar culture 45003900 cal BC [22,23]). How-

    ever, prior to the magnetic and soil chemical surveys, the

    boundaries of the site and the number and organization

    of the Tiszapolgar households at the site were not

    known. This work has shown that at the Veszto-Bikeri

    site a central cluster of 10 or 12 wall trench compounds

    and structures made of wattle-and-daub are flanked on

    the east and west by kilns, ovens, hearths and pits. An

    A. Sarris et al. / Journal of Archaeological Science 00 (2004) 113 11

  • 7/29/2019 Sarris_et_al._2004_JAS_Geophysical Prospection and Soil Chemistry at the Early Copper

    12/13

    open space separates this central living area from a ring

    midden or dumping zone that is enclosed by a triple ring

    of concentric ditches and palisades (Figs. 3 and 6, and

    Fig. 7). Livestock may have been penned or tethered

    inside these enclosures.

    While further excavations are needed to establish

    ground truth for the entire settlement layout, a workingmodel of an ECA settlement and its organization has

    been created and employed in our ongoing studies of the

    NeolithicCopper Age transition on the Great Hungar-

    ian Plain (ca 4500 BC). This transformation is marked

    by dramatic changes in house form, site layout, settle-

    ment distribution, and mortuary customs. The transition

    was part of a broad wave of culture change that spread

    across southeastern Europe [2123]. Late Neolithic/

    Early Copper Age populations dispersed and aban-

    doned the large villages and tells that had been inhabited

    for generations and adopted new lifestyles. This trans-

    formation affected nearly every aspect of social organi-

    zation, from households and villages to regional

    cultures. By combining the results of nondestructive

    surveys with excavated data, we can reconstruct the

    layout and internal organization of the small, dispersed

    Early Copper Age (ECA) sites that were inhabited after

    the large nucleated Late Neolithic (LN) settlements were

    abandoned. It appears that each of the large household

    groups that lived together at tells and large nucleated

    sites moved to a new location and established a separate

    settlement. Our data suggest that the households at the

    large Late Neolithic sites become separate Early Copper

    Age sites (hence the seven-fold increase in site numbers

    from the LN to ECA periods in the Koros River Valley[21]). The rooms within the large LN houses become

    discrete structures at the ECA settlements. While the

    causes of these changes are still unclear, the results of

    our nondestructive surveys and our excavations at

    Veszto-Bikeri have provided us with a framework for

    future investigations.

    Acknowledgements

    Doc Billingsley and Robert Tate, the undergraduate

    participants in this study, were supported by a grant

    from the National Science Foundation Research Experi-ences for Undergraduates (REU) Program. Additional

    support for the project was provided by the National

    Science Foundation US-Hungarian Cooperative

    Research Program, the Magyar-Amerikai Kutatasi

    Egyuttmukodes Program, the Wenner-Gren Foundation

    for Anthropological Research, Ohio State University,

    Florida State University, and Millsaps College.

    References

    [1] M. Aitken, Physics and Archaeology, second ed, Clarendon Press,

    Oxford, 1974.

    [2] H. Becker, Archaeologische Prospektion, Luftbildarcaologie

    und Geophysik, Arbeitshefte des Bayerischen Landesamtes fur

    Denkmalpflege, Band 59, Munchen, 199 6.

    [3] P.H. Bethell, I. Mate, The use of soil phosphate analysis in

    archaeology: a critique, in: J Henderson (ed.), Scientific Analysis

    in Archaeology, Oxford University Committee, Monograph No.

    19, Oxford, 1989, pp. 129.

    [4] D. Billingsley, M. Galaty, Site soil chemistry at Veszto-Bikeri,Bekes County, Hungary, Paper presented at the 68th Annual

    Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Milwaukee,

    2003.

    [5] V. Bjelajac, E.M. Luby, R. Ray, A validation test of a field-based

    phosphate analysis technique, Journal of Archaeological Science

    23 (1996) 243248.

    [6] I. Bognar- Kutzian, The Copper Age Cemetery of Tiszapolgar-

    Basatanya, Archaeologica Hungarica, Akademiai Kiado,

    Budapest, 1963.

    [7] I. Bog nar-Kutzian, The Early Copper Age Tiszapolgar Culture in

    the Carpathian Basin, Archaeologica Hungarica, Akademiai

    Kiado, Budapest, 1972.

    [8] J.S. Conway, An investigation of soil phosphorus distribution

    within occupation deposits from a Romano-British hut group,

    Journal of Archaeological Science 10 (1983) 117128.[9] A. Eder-Hinderleitner, W. Neubauer, P. Melichar, Reconstruc-

    tion of archaeological structures using magnetic prospection,

    Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 28 (1996) 131137.

    [10] I. Ecsedy, L. Kovacs, B. Maraz, I. Torma, Magyarorszag

    Regeszeti Topografiaja VI, Bekes Megy e Regeszeti Topografiaja:

    A Szeghalmi Ja ras (IV/1), Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 1982.

    [11] R.C. Eidt, A rapid field test for archaeological site surveying,

    American Antiquity 38 (1973) 206210.

    [12] K. Hegedus, J. Makkay, Veszto-Magor: a settlement of the Tisza

    Culture, in: P. Raczky (Ed.), The Late Neolithic of the Tisza

    Region: A Survey of Recent Excavations and Their Findings,

    Szolnok County Museums, Budapest-Szolnok, 1987, pp. 85104.

    [13] D. Jankovich, J. Makkay, B. Szoke, Magyarorszag Regeszeti

    Topografiaja VIII, Bekes Megye Regeszeti Topografiaja: A

    Szarvasi Jaras (IV/2), Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 1989.[14] D. Jankovich, P. Medgyesi, E. Nikolin, I. Szatmari, I. Torma,

    Magyarorszag Regeszeti Topogrfija X, Bekes Megye Regeszeti

    Topografiaja: Bekes es Bekescsaba Kornyeke IV3, Akademiai

    Kiado, Budapest, 1998.

    [15] M.K. John, Colorimetric determination of phosphorus in soil and

    plant materials with ascorbic acid, Soil Science 109 (4) (1970)

    214220.

    [16] T.W. Killion, Gardens of Prehistory: the Archaeology of

    Settlement Agriculture in Greater Mesoamerica, University of

    Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, 1992.

    [17] I. Kuzma, J. Tippak, Triple circular ditch system in Golianovo

    district, Nitra, Slovakia, in: M. Doneus, A. Eder-Hinderleitner,

    W. Neubauer (Eds.), 4th International Conference on Archaeo-

    logical Prospection, Austrian Academy of Science, Vienna, 2001,

    pp. 138141.[18] J.B. Lambert, Traces of the Past: Unraveling the Secrets of

    Archaeology through Chemistry, Helix Books, Reading, MA,

    1997.

    [19] W.D. Middleton, T.D. Price, Identification of activity areas by

    multi-element characterization of sediments from modern and

    archaeological house floors using Inductively Coupled Plasma-

    Atomic Emission Spectroscopy, Journal of Archaeological

    Science 23 (1996) 673687.

    [20] J. Murphy, J.P. Riley, A modified single solution method for the

    determination of phosphate in natural waters, Analytica Chemica

    Acta 27 (1962) 3136.

    [21] W.A. Parkinson, Integration, interaction, and tribal cycling: the

    transition to the Copper Age on the Great Hungarian Plain, in:

    W.A. Parkinson (Ed.), The Archaeology of Tribal Societies,

    A. Sarris et al. / Journal of Archaeological Science 00 (2004) 11312

  • 7/29/2019 Sarris_et_al._2004_JAS_Geophysical Prospection and Soil Chemistry at the Early Copper

    13/13

    International Monographs in Prehistory, Archaeological Series

    15, Ann Arbor, 2002, pp. 391438.

    [22] W.A. Parkinson, A. Gyucha, R.W. Yerkes, The Neolithic

    Copper Age transition on the Great Hungarian Plain: recent

    excavations at the Tiszapolgar Culture settlement of Veszto-

    Bikeri Antiquity 76 (2002) 619620.

    [23] W.A. Parkinson, R.W. Yerkes, A. Gyucha, The transition to the

    Copper Age on the Great Hungarian Plain: The Koros Regiona lArchaeological Project Excavations at Veszto-Bikeri and

    Korosladany-Bikeri, Hungary, 20002002, Journal of Field

    Archaeology (2004), in press.

    [24] J.J. Parnell, R.E. Terry, Z. Nelson, Soil chemical analysis applied

    as an integrative tool for ancient human activities in Piedras

    Negras, Guatemala, Journal of Archaeological Science 29 (2002)

    379404.

    [25] A. Sarris, Geophysical prospection survey at Veszto, Hungary

    (2002), Technical Report, Laboratory of Geophysical-

    Satellite Remote Sensing & Archaeo-Environment, Institute for

    Mediterranean Studies, F.O.R.T.H., Rethymno, Crete, Greece,

    2003.

    [26] A. Sarris, G. Poulioudis, A. Giourou, V. Kevgas, D.

    Triantaphyllos, D. Terzopoulou, Geophysical Investigations

    of tumuli in Thrace, Proceedings of the 32nd International

    Symposium on Archaeometry, (Archaeometry 2000), Mexico

    City, 2001.

    [27] D.R. Schlezinger, B.L. Howes, Organic phosphorus and elemen-

    tal ratios as indicators of prehistoric human occupation, Journal

    of Archaeological Science 27 (2000) 479492.[28] P. Spoerry, Geoprospection in the Archaeological Landscape,

    Oxbow Books, Monograph No. 18, Oxford, 1992.

    [29] R.R. Tate, Magnetometry at Veszto-Bikeri, Hungary, Paper

    presented at the 68th Annual Meeting of the Society for American

    Archaeology, Milwaukee, 2003.

    [30] J. Weymouth, Geophysical methods of archaeological site

    surveying, in: M.B. Schiffer (Ed.), Advances in Archaeological

    Method & Theory 9, Academic Press, New York, 1986,

    pp. 341351.

    A. Sarris et al. / Journal of Archaeological Science 00 (2004) 113 13