SB RRMM Auburn Presentation Power Point) December 7 2010 (2)

8/7/2019 SB RRMM Auburn Presentation Power Point) December 7 2010 (2)

1/20

Montgomery County School Board Update

Auburn Campus ImprovementsDecember 7, 2010

RRMM Architects 1


2/20

Presentation Agenda

1. Summary of September 21, 2010Presentation

2. Consideration of a Combined Grades 6-

12 School

3. Key Decisions Needed to Move Forward

4. Q&A

2


3/20

Project Status

1. We are in the early phases of design

2. Design Decisions Move from Big toSmall

. ,macro level

4. Cost estimates need refinement

3


4/20

Master Plan Programming Goals

High School : Grades 9-12 Middle School: Grades 6-8

Initial Capacity: 600 Initial Capacity 480

Future Capacity: 800 Future Capacity: 600

Core Classrooms: 37/47 Core Classrooms: 24/30

For the Building

1200-seat Gymnasium

Full-Size Auxiliary Gym

Field-House for Home/Visitor

2 P.E. / 2 Team Locker Rooms800-seat Auditorium

Dining Area for Enrollment

600-seat Gymnasium

2 P.E. / 2 Team Locker Rooms

250 to 300-seat Auditorium

Dining Area for 1/3 Enrollment

Will Follow Planning Standards Adopted by the School Board in 2000

Pod concept will be applied where feasible 4


5/20

Master Plan Programming Goals

High School : Grades 9-12 Middle School: Grades 6-8

Auto Parking: 515 Auto Parking: 120Football Stadium / Track (Existing)

Competition Baseball Field

For Site Amenities

Competition Softball Field2 Large Multi-Purpose Practice

Fields (200 X 400)

2 Large Multi-Purpose Practice

Fields (200 X 400)

6 Tennis CourtsHard-Surface Recreation Area Hard-Surface Recreation Area

20 Bus Spaces

5


6/20

New High School Site Plan

RRMM Architects 6

III

IIII

I/

I

//

///

(....---":-----------............ ...\ \ \

,.....,..... ....................,/

\ '\ J\ \. ..../"'---------------

L_________ L______ _


7/20

New Middle School Site Plan

RRMM Architects 7

IIIIIII

I

///

///

/

/ / / ........ '1/

L ________ _

,-------,I II II II II IIIIIIIIIIIIL ______ _


8/20

Highlights of Community Preferences

1. All Facilities on Site

2. MS / HS Interaction - Share Outdoors / Separate

Indoors

3. New High School over New Middle School

. rc tectura aracter: espect t e or g nafor any renovations, Draw from the region forany new building

5. Relocate (in some form) Cannery and Cabin

6. Use Green Features where appropriate

8


9/20

Key Planning Assumptions

All Facilities on Site

Separate Buildings for MS and HS

Shared Site Amenities (Parking and Athletic Fields)Cabin / Cannery Are Not Accommodated at Existing Location

Masterplan Driven v. Funding Driven

RRMM Architects

Re-Use What Makes Sense to Re-Use (Maximize Investment)

Existing Middle School Will Be Demolished

Awkward LocationPoor Programmatic Fit, One Story

Excess Vehicular Entrances

Limited Land Area 9


10/20

Feasibility Criteria

New Middle School v. New High School

1. Site Feasibility

2. Programmatic Fit : Most closely meets the

RRMM Architects

p ann ng stan ar s an prov es as

century learning environment while respectingbudgetary concerns

3. Construction Transition Plan (Phasing Plan)

10


11/20

New Middle School Site Plan

RRMM Architects 11

IIIIIII

I

///

///

/

/ / / ........ '1/

L ________ _

,-------,I II II II II IIIIIIIIIIIIL ______ _


12/20

HS to HS Renovation / Addition Design Concept

RRMM Architects

Existing Buildings

12

- - ~ -


13/20


RRMM Architects

Existing Buildings Remaining After Demolition

13

~ - -- ----


14/20


RRMM Architects

Buildout of High School Renovation / Addition14


15/20

HS to MS Renovation / Addition Design Concept

RRMM Architects

Existing Buildings

15


16/20


RRMM Architects

Buildout of MS Renovation / Addition16


17/20


RRMM Architects

Ultimate Buildout of MS Renovation / Addition

17


18/20

Would building a combined 6-12 school be

more cost effective than separate buildings?1. Valid considerationcombined schools often provide

increased efficiency in capital and operating costs

2. However, typical advantages of a combined school donot apply at the Auburn Strand.

One large connected building could reduceflexibility to configure the site

Only a minor advantage in building efficiency

3. 6-12 School is more costly it takes away theadvantage of renovating the existing High School.

4. Combined school also reduces funding flexibility. 18


19/20


RRMM Architects

Buildout of High School Renovation / Addition19


20/20

Decisions Needed to Move Forward

1. Confirm Enrollment Targets and Program (Buildingand Site) for both Middle and High Schools (Slides 4,5)

2. Decide on overall approachRecommendation is for

New HS , Renovated HS to become MS, demolition ofexisting MS, and full site development.

3. Confirm that Cannery and Cabin can be addressed

through some form of relocation4. Does the board want to consider options for limited

upgrades to the existing HS (to become a MS) at thistime to reduce the overall initial project cost?

5. If yes to No. 4, more study is needed, and a masterplan is still recommended for the Middle School. Thiswould not delay the design of the High School.

20

Documents

SB RRMM Auburn Presentation Power Point) December 7 2010 (2)