SCHEDULE 22

PI,::RS Study The scope of the proposal prepal'ed by the Transport Research Laboratory

This is the Sc:hedule number 22 to the Section 106 Agreement dated October 2010 and made between (l)THE MAYOR AND BURGESSES OF THE LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET (2)KLI:INWORT BENSON (CHANNEL ISLANDS) CORPORATE SERVICES LIMITED (;3) KLEINWORT BENSON (JERSEY) TRUSTEES LIMITED (4) HAMMERSON (BRI~NT CROSS) LIMITED (5) CRICKLEWOOD REGENIERATION LIMITED (6) HAfVlMERSON (CRICKLEWOOD) LIMITED and (7) TRANSPORT FOR LON DON

PARTY SIGNATORYjSIGNATORIES

~

THE MAYOR AND BURGESSES OF THE LONDO BOROUGH OF BARNET

KLEINWORT BENSON (CHANNEL ISLANDS) CORPORATE SERVICES LIMITED

~S£' ------~

f\

A~~,~

KLEINWORT BENSON (JERSEY) TRUSTEES LIMITED

l~\[~ HAMfVIERSOI\J (BRENT CROSS) LIMITED

CRICKLEWOOD REGENERATION LIMITED

~~ t--!J ~\~'---~

'"

~ S::\~"J'--HAMfVlERSOI\J (CRICKLEWOOD) LIMITED

TRANSPORT FOR LONDON

~

~~\~

l(tjJ-,

336

I

SC EDULE 22

F'ERS STUDY

Methodology and Output

Methodology

Based upon the PERS v2 process, as identified in the PERS v2 handbook, a staged process for auditing should be undertaken:

Stage 1: Definition of the study area

Stage 2: Desktop identification of links, crossings, routes and spaces to be audited

Stage 3: On-street evaluation

Stage 4: Data analysis using the PEI~S v2 software

Stage 5: Display and review outputs and develop recommendations Each stage is defined in more detail below:

Stage 1: DE~finit'ion of the study ama

This stage aims to finalise the audit area with the Developers, London Borough of Barnet and TfL to identify any known local information or existing relevant data which may inform the study. Local knowlc'dge of the site to be audited may assist in the initial defining of appropriate links, crossings, routes and spaces at a desk-top level.

Sta!;Je 2: Desktop identification cf links, crossings, routes and spaces to be audited

Having identified the areas to be audited, desk-top mapping should be used as a bas's to initially identify the links, crossings, routes and spaces. It is envisaged that this identification will be adapted dUI-ing the on-site auditing (as links are further sub­divided where necessary etc)

Stage 3: On-street evaluation

Following Stage 2, the audit team should undertake the on-street PERS v2 auditing collecting a full set of PERS data including all links, crossin~~s, routes, waiting areas and spaces (as required). The auditing will take place using paper copies of the audit forms for subsequent input intc the PERS v2 software.

Sta!;:Je 4: Data analysis using the F'ERS v2 software

Having manually collected the PERS data for each audit area, the data will be subsequently input into the software

Stage 5: Display and review outpU!ts and make recommendations

Having inputted the data, the results should be analysed and a report produced of the key findings, presented with tables and mapping used to display the findings. Phctographs should also be taken on site and included in the report to exemplify

Legal. 13444154.1/VYL/22668.00007 1 15.06.10

particular findings. The report should include headline and specific recommendations on where particular aspects of the pedestrian environment need improvement.

Project Output

The PERS report for the walking routes to Brent Cross Cricklewood Redevelopment should outline the key findings and detailed recommendations. The report should identify 'quick win' maintenance recommendations as well as medium Iiong term design recommendations. The report should include:

Introduction

Background information

Findings and recommendations (including PERS scores, photography and RedlAmberl Green maps showing key problems)

o Links

o Crossings

o Routes

o Waiting areas

o Public spaces

o Interchange spaces

Summary

Legal.13444154.1/VYL/22668.00007 2 15.06.10