School Accountability Report Card · Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2013-14) Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2013-14) Group Percent of Total Enrollment

Freedom High

Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. The SARC contains information aboutthe condit ion and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educat ional agencies (LEAs) are required toprepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, w ith specific act ivit ies to addressstate and local priorit ies. Addit ionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent w ith data reported in the SARC.

For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Educat ion (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.

View this SARC online at the school and/or LEA Web sites.

For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/.

For addit ional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school principal or the district office.

California Department of Education

School Accountability Report CardReported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year

Published During 2014-15

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/

http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/.

Last updated: 1/27/2015


About This School

Contact Information - Most Recent YearContact Information - Most Recent Year

School

School Name Freedom High

Street 1050 Neroly Rd.

City, State, Zip Oakley, Ca, 94561

Phone Number 925-625-5900

Principal Erik Faulkner, Principal

E-mail Address [email protected]

County-District-School (CDS) Code

07617210730457

District

District Name Liberty Union High

Phone Number (925) 634-2166

Web Site www.libertyuhsd.k12.ca.us

SuperintendentFirst Name

Eric

SuperintendentLast Name

Volta

E-mail Address [email protected]

School Description and Mission Statement (Most Recent Year)School Description and Mission Statement (Most Recent Year)

School DescriptionIn its eighteenth year of operat ion, Freedom High School is located in a rural-suburban port ion of East Contra Costa County. Situated amongst new housingdevelopments, and farm land to the east, Freedom serves students from a large and diverse student populat ion. FHS is the largest of the three comprehensivehigh schools in the LUHSD. The local sett ing also underscores the challenge of serving both rural and suburban communit ies. Freedom High School is acomprehensive four-year high school that is accredited by the Western Associat ion of Schools and Colleges. This is the third year of a six-year w ith a mid-termcheck accreditat ion, w ith the mid-term visit set to take place in the 2014-2015 school year. October enrollments for Freedom totaled 2549 students. Theschool’s attendance area serves the communit ies of Oakley, Knightsen, Bethel Island and Northern Brentwood. FHS employs over one hundred fifteencredent ialed employees and sixty classified employees. This includes eight maintenance and custodial staff who are assigned to the school on a permanent basisand are responsible for maintaining a safe and clean campus.

School MissionFreedom High School w ill educate students in a safe, support ive learning environment while preparing them for a successful future as product ive members ofsociety. Freedom will be the center for knowledge and pride in the community.

2013-14 SARC - Freedom High

Page 2 of 21

mailto:[email protected]

www.libertyuhsd.k12.ca.us

mailto:[email protected]



Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2013-14)Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2013-14)

Grade Level Number of Students

Grade 9 683

Grade 10 628

Grade 11 638

Grade 12 611

Total Enrollment 2560

Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 120

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2013-14)Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2013-14)

Group Percent of Total Enrollment

Black or African American 10.5

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive 0.4

Asian 2.1

Filipino 4.6

Hispanic or Lat ino 39.8

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 1.1

White 38.7

Two or More Races 2.8

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 40.0

English Learners 6.0

Students w ith Disabilit ies 14.6

Black or African American

American Indian or A laska Native

Asian

Filipino

Hispanic or Latino

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

White

Two or More Races

10%

2%4%

39%

1%

38%

2%


Page 3 of 21



A. Conditions of Learning

State Priority: Basic

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1):

Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credent ialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching;Pupils have access to standards-aligned instruct ional materials; andSchool facilit ies are maintained in good repair.

Note: “Misassignments” refers to the number of posit ions filled by teachers who lack legal authorizat ion to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc.

* Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners.

Teacher CredentialsTeacher Credentials

Teachers School District

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2014-15

With Full Credent ial 108 107 113 342

Without Full Credent ial 1 0 0 2

Teachers Teaching Outside SubjectArea of Competence (w ith fullcredent ial)

0 0 0

2012-13 2013-14 2014-150

20

40

60

80

100

120Teachers with Full Credential

Teachers without Full Credential

Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher PositionsTeacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions

Indicator2012-

132013-

142014-

15

Misassignments of Teachers of EnglishLearners

0 0 0

Total Teacher Misassignments* 0 0 0

Vacant Teacher Posit ions 0 0 0

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners

Total Teacher Misassignments

Vacant Teacher Positions


Page 4 of 21

Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools w ith student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those w ith student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program.

Year and month in which data were collected: January 2015

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2013-14)Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2013-14)

Location of ClassesPercent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Taught by

Highly Qualified TeachersPercent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Not Taught by

Highly Qualified Teachers

This School 100 0

All Schools in District 99 1

High-Poverty Schoolsin District

100 0

Low-Poverty Schoolsin District

99 1

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials - Most Recent YearQuality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials - Most Recent Year

Subject Textbooks and Instructional Materials/year of AdoptionFrom Most Recent

Adoption?Percent Students Lacking

Own Assigned Copy

Reading/LanguageArts California Holt Literature and Language Arts - Holt , Rinehart & W inston

No 0.0

MathematicsAlgebra I - Larson BIG IDEAS Algebra 1 Common CoreGeometry - Larson BIG IDEAS Geometry Common CoreAlgebra II - Larson BIG IDEAS Algebra 2 Common Core

Pre-Calculus - Funct ions and Graphs; Cengage (Thompson Learning)Brooks/Cole

AP Calculus - Calculus, Graphical, Numerical, Algegraic: Finney, Demana, Waits,Kennedy. Addison Wesley Longman

Stat ist ic - Modeling the World; Prent ice Hall, Bock, Velleman De VeaxAP Stat ist ics - The Pract ice of Stat ist ics Calculator Enhanced Freeman

Publishing

Yes 0.0

ScienceEarth Science - Holt Earth Science California, Allison, Degaetano, Pasachoff

Biology - Biology, McDougal Lit tellChemistry - Prent ice Hall Chemistry California Edit ion; W ilbraham, Staley, Matta,

Watterman: Prent ice Hall/Pearson Educat ionPhysics - Holt Physics; Serway and Faughn

Environmental Science - Environmental Science Holt , Rinehart, W instonAP Biology - Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life, Star and Taggart;

Wadsworth PublishingAP Chemistry - Chemistry, Zumdahl; D.C. HealthBiotechnology - Science for the New Millenium

Entomology - Fundamentals of Entomoloy - Prent ice Hall: Richard J. ElizingaA Survey of Entomology - Writers Club Press; Frank Young, Gene Kritsky,

12/06

No 0.0

History-SocialScience World History - Patterns of Interact ion, McDougal Lit tell, Beck

US History - The Americans, McDougal Lit tell, DanzerAmerican Government - Magruder's Government, Prent ice Hall, Magruder

Economics - Principles in Act ion, Prent ice HallAP World History - World Civilizat ions the Global Experience, Prent ice Hall,

StearnsAP US History - The Enduring Vision 5th Edit ion, McDougal Lit tell, BoyerAP Economics - Economics 16th Edit ion, Glencoe, McConnell and BrueAP Government - American Government 10th Edit ion, McDougal Lit tell,

W ilson, and Dilulio

No 0.0

Foreign LanguageSpanish I - V - Que Chévere - EMC

French I - V - T 'es Branche, EMC/Paradigm PublisherGerman I - III - Portfolio Deutch, Klett-Langenschiedt

Yes 0.0

HealthHealth - Glencoe Health; Glencoe, Mary H. Bronson

No 0.0


Page 5 of 21



School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements - Most Recent Year

School Facility Good Repair Status - Most Recent Year

Visual andPerforming Arts Intro to Art History - Discovering Art History, Davis Publicat ions

Theatre Arts 1, 2, 3 - Basic Drama Projects. 8th Edit ion, Tanner, FranAverett, Perfect ion Learning Corporat ion

Beginning Art - Art Fundamentals 9th ed. McGraw Hill 2002Intermediate Art - The Annotated mona Lisa, Andrews & McMeel, Carol

StriklandAdvanced Paint ing & Draw ing - Discovering Art History, Second Edit ion Gerald

F. Brommer; Davis Publicat ions IncAP Art History - Gardener's Art Through the Ages, Tenth Edit ion De la Croix

and Tansey; Harcourt Brace

No 0.0

Science LabEqpmt(9-12) Earth Science - Holt Earth Science California, Allison, Degaetano, Pasachoff

Biology - Biology, McDougal Lit tellChemistry - Prent ice Hall Chemistry California Edit ion; W ilbraham, Staley, Matta,

Watterman: Prent ice Hall/Pearson Educat ionPhysics - Holt Physics; Serway and Faughn

Environmental Science - Environmental Science Holt , Rinehart, W instonAP Biology - Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life, Star and Taggart;

Wadsworth PublishingAP Chemistry - Chemistry, Zumdahl; D.C. Health

Biotechnology - Science for the New MilleniumEntomology - Fundamentals ofEntomoloy - Prent ice Hall: Richard J. Elizinga

A Survey of Entomology - Writers Club Press; Frank Young, Gene Kritsky,12/06

No 0.0

A walk-thru is completed two t imes a year addressing school facility condit ions. The site is evaluated and any facilit ies that need repair are listed onthe Facility Inspect ion Tool. The results of this survey are available at the district office. Planned remedial act ion and a t imeline are set by the site and district . The site and the district are committed to provide safe, clean, adequate and funct ional facilit ies to staff and students. District maintenance staff ensures that therepairs necessary to keep the school in good repair and working order are completed in a t imely manner. An online work order process isused to ensure efficient service and the emergency repairs are given the highest priority. The Supervisor of Maintenance and Operat ions works daily w ith thecustodial staff to develop cleaning schedules to ensure a clean and safe school. The W illiams Uniform Complaint form, regarding facilit ies, can be picked up at thePrincipal’s Office.

Concrete repair and select carpet replacment needed.

System Inspected Rating

Repair Needed andAction Taken or

Planned

Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC,Sewer

Good

Interior: Interior Surfaces Good

Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness,Pest/Vermin Infestat ion

Good

Electrical: Electrical Good

Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms,Sinks/Fountains

Good

Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Good

Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs Good


Page 6 of 21


Overall Facility Rate - Most Recent Year

External: Playground/School Grounds,W indows/Doors/Gates/Fences

Good

Overall Rat ing Exemplary


Page 7 of 21


B. Pupil Outcomes

State Priority: Pupil Achievement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the Pupil Achievement State Priority (Priority 4):

Statew ide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress and its successor the Standardized Test ing and Report ing Program);The Academic Performance Index; andThe percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that sat isfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the CaliforniaState University, or career technical educat ion sequences or programs of study.

Note: Science assessments include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for stat ist icalaccuracy or to protect student privacy.

Note: Science assessments include CSTs, CMA, and CAPA in grades 5, 8, and 10.

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for stat ist icalaccuracy or to protect student privacy.

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress/ Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for AllCalifornia Assessment of Student Performance and Progress/ Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All

Students in Science – Three-Year ComparisonStudents in Science – Three-Year Comparison

Subject

Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)

School District State

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 66 71 66 64 67 66 60 59 60

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results by Student Group in Science (School YearCalifornia Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results by Student Group in Science (School Year

2013-14)2013-14)

Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

All Students in the LEA 66

All Students at the School 66

Male 66

Female 65

Black or African American 52

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive

Asian

Filipino 76

Hispanic or Lat ino 57


White 75

Two or More Races 83

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 57

English Learners 22

Students w ith Disabilit ies 55

Students Receiving Migrant Educat ion Services


Page 8 of 21





Note: STAR Program was last administered in 2012–13. Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number ofstudents in this category is too small for stat ist ical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

Note: For 2014 and subsequent years, the statew ide and similar schools ranks w ill no longer be produced.

Note: “N/D” means that no data were available to the CDE or LEA to report. “B” means the school did not have a valid API Base and there is no Growth or targetinformation. “C” means the school had significant demographic changes and there is no Growth or target information.

Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students - Three-Year ComparisonStandardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison

Subject

Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)


2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

English-Language Arts 49% 55% 58% 53% 59% 62% 54% 56% 55%

Mathematics 25% 30% 26% 27% 30% 28% 49% 50% 50%

History-Social Science 45% 49% 48% 47% 50% 52% 48% 49% 49%

Academic Performance Index Ranks – Three-Year ComparisonAcademic Performance Index Ranks – Three-Year Comparison

API Rank 2011 2012 2013

Statew ide 6 6 7

Similar Schools 6 8 9

Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group – Three-Year ComparisonAcademic Performance Index Growth by Student Group – Three-Year Comparison

Group Actual API Change 2011 Actual API Change 2012 Actual API Change 2013

All Students at the School 7 23 10

Black or African American 6 17 2

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive

Asian

Filipino

Hispanic or Lat ino 20 32 13


White -3 21 12

Two or More Races

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -4 48 18

English Learners 7 9 12

Students w ith Disabilit ies 22 58 21


Page 9 of 21



Career Technical Education Programs (School Year 2013-14)Career Technical Education Programs (School Year 2013-14)

In Freedom High School, career tech educat ion courses are organized through career paths w ithin school-to-career academies. The academy curriculum integratesacademic and career/technical educat ion. There are current ly three academies at FHS, each w ith a part icular focus and career paths defined by majors. A majorconsists of a series of related courses w ithin a career orientat ion. Enrollment in an academy is voluntary for students and staff. The goal is to provide the student,at the complet ion of the academy program, the opt ion of entering the job market, enrolling at a community college or technical school, or pursuing collegiatestudies w ith a clearly art iculated academic background in a part icular area. Students who complete an academy program are honored at graduat ion w ith a specialdesignat ion, such as a stole, medallion or pin. Students are encouraged to explore our academy offerings and join the academy that best fits their personalinterests and post-high school goals. Each academy has a site administrator assigned to work w ith the academy and its students. Our academies have seen agreat deal of restructuring over the past several years in order to increase rigor and provide meaningful experiences for students. Current ly, we have three act iveacademies. Professional Human Development (PHD) Academy prepares students for those who want to major in teaching, medical/sports medicine, psychology,law enforcement, and fire science. The STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) Academy prepares students who want to major in such fields.Finally, the Communicat ions Academy prepares students who want to study media communicat ions, business and the arts.

Career Technical Education Participation (School Year 2013-14)Career Technical Education Participation (School Year 2013-14)

Measure CTE Program Participation

Number of pupils part icipat ing in CTE 1599

Percent of pupils complet ing a CTE program and earning a high school diploma 98.0

Percent of CTE courses sequenced or art iculated between the school and inst itut ions of postsecondary educat ion 5.0

Courses for University of California and/or California State University AdmissionCourses for University of California and/or California State University Admission

UC/CSU Course Measure Percent

2013-14 Students Enrolled in Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 67.1

2012-13 Graduates Who Completed All Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 42.3


Page 10 of 21



State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the Other Pupil Outcomes State Priority (Priority 8):

Pupil outcomes in the subject areas of English, mathematics, and physical educat ion.

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small forstat ist ical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

California High School Exit Examination Results for All Grade Ten Students – Three-Year Comparison (ifCalifornia High School Exit Examination Results for All Grade Ten Students – Three-Year Comparison (if

applicable)applicable)

Subject

Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced


2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

English-Language Arts 55% 60% 59% 61% 65% 48% 56% 57% 56%

Mathematics 53% 53% 63% 55% 62% 49% 58% 60% 62%

English-Language Arts Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient orAdvanced

2011-12 2012-13 2013-140

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Mathematics Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

2011-12 2012-13 2013-140

10

20

30

40

50

60

70


Page 11 of 21





California High School Exit Examination Grade Ten Results by Student Group (School Year 2013-14) (ifCalifornia High School Exit Examination Grade Ten Results by Student Group (School Year 2013-14) (if

applicable)applicable)

Group

English-Language Arts Mathematics

Percent NotProficient

PercentProficient

PercentAdvanced

Percent NotProficient

PercentProficient

PercentAdvanced

All Students in the LEA 37% 28% 34% 36% 45% 18%

All Students at the School 41% 30% 28% 37% 48% 15%

Male 48% 29% 23% 39% 44% 17%

Female 34% 32% 34% 35% 52% 13%

Black or African American 52% 31% 16% 55% 37% 8%

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Asian N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Filipino 27% 33% 40% 27% 50% 23%

Hispanic or Lat ino 50% 29% 21% 45% 47% 9%

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

White 34% 30% 36% 28% 50% 23%

Two or More Races 19% 41% 41% 19% 56% 26%

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 50% 29% 21% 45% 44% 10%

English Learners 86% 14% N/A 84% 16% N/A

Students w ith Disabilit ies 85% 10% 5% 78% 18% 4%

Students Receiving Migrant Educat ionServices

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2013-14)California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2013-14)

Grade level

Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards

Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards

9 8.7% 34.8% 50.5%


Page 12 of 21



C. Engagement

State Priority: Parental Involvement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3):

Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite.

State Priority: Pupil Engagement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the Pupil Engagement State Priority (Priority 5):

High school dropout rates; andHigh school graduat ion rates.

Opportunities for Parental Involvement - Most Recent YearOpportunities for Parental Involvement - Most Recent Year

Parents have the ability to support Freedom High School formally through organizat ions such as Athlet ic Boosters, Music Boosters, Choral Boosters, Art Boosters,School Site Council, Parent Advisory Group, Coffee w ith the Principal, ELAC/DLAC and volunteer opportunit ies on site. Parents are also encouraged to attendevents such as Back to School Night, Open House, Falcon Fest ival as well as sport ing events and various student performances. Parents can also meet w ithteachers, counselors and administrat ion as needed to discuss their student ’s school progress and performance. Parents can also part icipate on the School SiteCouncil (SSC). The School Site Council (SSC) is composed of parents, students, teachers, administrators, and classified staff members. It oversees the t it le 1 planwhich supports the school in trying to close the achievement gaps for certain populat ions. It also monitors the Single Plan for Student Achievement, andauthorizes expenditures for school w ide professional development.

Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate)Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate)

Indicator


2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Dropout Rate 2.1 1.1 2.2 5.2 3.5 4.5 14.7 13.1 11.4

Graduat ion Rate 97.09 96.36 96.83 85.59 86.25 86.86 77.14 78.87 80.44

Dropout/Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) Chart

2010-11 2011-12 2012-130

20

40

60

80

100Dropout Rate

Graduation Rate


Page 13 of 21

Completion of High School Graduation RequirementsCompletion of High School Graduation Requirements

Group

Graduating Class of 2013


All Students 92 83 84

Black or African American 73 65 75

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive 66 68 77

Asian 100 95 92

Filipino 100 86 92

Hispanic or Lat ino 91 80 80

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 66 71 84

White 98 87 90

Two or More Races 100 89 89

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 89 76 82

English Learners 70 50 53

Students w ith Disabilit ies 70 52 60


Page 14 of 21



State Priority: School Climate

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6):

Pupil suspension rates;Pupil expulsion rates; andOther local measures on the sense of safety.

Suspensions and ExpulsionsSuspensions and Expulsions


Rate 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

Suspensions 8.20 6.50 5.70 8.20 6.10 5.90 5.70 5.10 4.40

Expulsions 0.10 0.30 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10

Suspensions

2011-12 2012-13 2013-140

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9School Suspensions

District Suspensions

State Suspensions

Expulsions

2011-12 2012-13 2013-140.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35School Expulsions

District Expulsions

State Expulsions


Page 15 of 21


School Safety Plan - Most Recent YearSchool Safety Plan - Most Recent Year

Each site updates their Emergency and School Safety Plans on a yearly basis. Standard Operat ing Procedures (S.O.P.) were developed for all staff membersdealing w ith safety issues. Quarterly, the District meets w ith students to address safety issues on campus.


Page 16 of 21




D. Other SARC InformationThe information in this sect ion is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorit ies for LCFF.

Note: Cells w ith NA values do not require data.

* DW (determinat ion waiver) indicates that the PI status of the school was carried over from the prior year in accordance w ith the flexibility granted through the federalwaiver process.

* Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information isreported by subject area rather than grade level.

Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2013-14)Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2013-14)

AYP Criteria School District

Made AYP Overall No No

Met Part icipat ion Rate - English-Language Arts Yes Yes

Met Part icipat ion Rate - Mathematics Yes Yes

Met Percent Proficient - English-Language Arts No No

Met Percent Proficient - Mathematics Yes No

Met Graduat ion Rate Yes Yes

Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2014-15)Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2014-15)

Indicator School District

Program Improvement Status

First Year of Program Improvement

Year in Program Improvement *

Number of Schools Current ly in Program Improvement N/A

Percent of Schools Current ly in Program Improvement N/A %

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

Subject Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+

English 27.9 18 44 34 30.0 13 47 37 30.0 17 28 56

Mathematics 28.8 11 73 27 27.0 18 68 17 28.0 11 71 22

Science 30.0 3 50 19 30.0 5 52 17 30.0 3 52 15

Social Science 31.7 5 28 40 31.0 7 36 43 32.0 4 33 47


Page 17 of 21



Note: Cells w ith N/A values do not require data.

* One Full T ime Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full t ime; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full t ime.


Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2013-14)Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2013-14)

Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor

Academic Counselor 3.0 800.0

Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) N/A

Library Media Teacher (librarian) 0.3 N/A

Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional) 1.0 N/A

Psychologist 1.0 N/A

Social Worker N/A

Nurse N/A

Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 1.0 N/A

Resource Specialist (non-teaching) N/A

Other N/A

Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)

LevelTotal Expenditures Per

PupilExpenditures Per Pupil

(Supplemental/Restricted)

Expenditures PerPupil

(Basic/Unrestricted)Average Teacher

Salary

School Site $6,240 $1,287 $4,952 $67,213

District N/A N/A $4,748 $65,276

Percent Difference – School Site andDistrict

N/A N/A 4.31% 1.02%

State N/A N/A $4,690 $72,276

Percent Difference – School Site and State N/A N/A -11.00% -6.11%


Page 18 of 21



For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Cert ificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/ .

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2013-14)Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2013-14)

The Liberty Union High School District spends approximately $6239.82 annually per student for this site. This includes all educat ion costs ranging from directsalaries of teachers, custodial and maintenance, facilit ies, ut ilit ies, and administrat ion. It also includes costs of support services such as counseling, library and mediaservices, and special State and Federal categorical funds.

Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)

Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category

Beginning Teacher Salary $43,180 $42,957

Mid-Range Teacher Salary $65,926 $69,613

Highest Teacher Salary $81,242 $89,407

Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $00 N/A

Average Principal Salary (Middle) $00 $120,526

Average Principal Salary (High) $124,076 $129,506

Superintendent Salary $167,280 $207,044

Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 38.0% 37.0%

Percent of Budget for Administrat ive Salaries 5.0% 5.0%

Teacher Salary Chart

Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

Principal Salary Chart

Average Principal Salary

(Elementary)


(Middle)


(High)

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000


Page 19 of 21

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/



*Where there are student course enrollments.

Advanced Placement Courses (School Year 2013-14)Advanced Placement Courses (School Year 2013-14)

Subject Number of AP Courses Offered* Percent of Students In AP Courses

Computer Science N/A

English 8 N/A

Fine and Performing Arts N/A

Foreign Language 1 N/A

Mathematics 1 N/A

Science 3 N/A

Social Science 9 N/A

All Courses 22 0.3


Page 20 of 21


Professional Development – Most Recent Three YearsProfessional Development – Most Recent Three Years

Focus areas for professional development are based on assessment data, our district Strategic Plan, and the new Common Core State Standards (CCSS). We haveinit iated content coaches for both ELA and math to help focus on improving student achievement and improving the delivery of curriculum. In addit ion, we hold adistrict-w ide Professional Development Day at the beginning of the school year which focuses on the CCSS. The school site also has Professional LearningCommunit ies (PLC's) for the purpose of teacher collaborat ion, data analysis, sharing best and curriculum development.


Page 21 of 21

Documents

School Accountability Report Card · Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2013-14) Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2013-14) Group Percent of Total Enrollment