Seattle Schools Staffing Adjustment Appendix 2015

Briefing on Staffing Adjustment Calculations (Working draft) Date: Friday October, 9, 2015 Page: 1

Start of School working team October Staffing Adjustments: Elementary, Middle and K-8 schools

1: Summary of GenEd staffing adjustment recommendations 1.1: FTE Adds:

Sch

oo

l

Sch

oo

l

Typ

e

Equ

ity

Fact

or

Nb

r

Equ

ity

Fac

tor

Leve

l

% o

f B

elo

w g

rad

e

leve

l stu

den

ts

Bel

ow

gra

de

leve

l

Cu

rren

t FT

E

Rec

om

men

ded

n

ew F

TE

Rec

om

men

dat

ion

A

dd

/Pu

ll

Reason-Summary

Rainier View ES 3.5 2-Med 44% 2-Med 10.0 11.0 +1.0 HP(1), +29 students above projection

Viewlands ES 4.0 2-Med 43% 2-Med 16.0 17.0 +1.0 +12 students above projection, add due to class config (3)

At 17 FTEs, there are 1 split, and no overage classes

Hamilton Intl. MS 0.5 3-Low 14% 3-Low 43.5 44.5 +1.0 +30 students above projection

Madison MS 2.0 3-Low 30% 2-Med 27.6 29.6 +2.0 +35 students above projection

1.2: FTE Pulls (Did not received FTE adds in August):

Sch

oo

l

Sch

oo

l

Typ

e

Equ

ity

Fact

or

Nb

r

Equ

ity

Fact

or

Leve

l

% o

f B

elo

w

grad

e le

vel

stu

den

ts

Bel

ow

grad

e le

vel

Cu

rren

t FT

E

Rec

om

me

nd

ed n

ew

FTE

Rec

om

me

nd

atio

n

Ad

d/P

ull Reason-Summary

Alki ES 1.5 3-

Low 37%

2-Med

17.0 16.0 (1.0) FTE and 0.5

PCP

+10 students above projection, pull due to class config

At 16 FTEs, there are 2 splits, and 1 overage class (1 student)

Pull split reduction 1.0 FTE added in March

B. F. Day ES 2.5 3-

Low 40%

2-Med

13.0 12.0 (1.0) -22 students below projection.

At 12 FTEs, there is no split, 2 overage classes (by 1 and 2 students)

(1): HP: "high poverty classification is determined by OSPI based on October 2014 Free and Reduced lunch counts. The list of high poverty schools is posted on OSPI website, under School Apportionment and Finance page (2): Middle schools current FTE includes PCP (3): Viewlands dropped from the High poverty list for 15-16 SY. It was decided to keep staffing ratios used for the High poverty schools



1. 2: Pulls (Did not received FTE adds in August): (Continue) Sc

ho

ol

Sch

oo

l

Typ

e

Equ

ity

Fact

or

Nb

r

Equ

ity

Fac

tor

Leve

l

% o

f B

elo

w

grad

e le

vel

stu

den

ts

Bel

ow

gra

de

leve

l

Cu

rren

t FT

E

Rec

om

men

ded

new

FTE

Rec

om

men

dat

ion

Ad

d/P

ull

Reason-Summary

Beacon Hill Intl.

ES 2.5 3-

Low 46%

1-High

21.0 20.0 (1.0) FTE

and 0.5 PCP

-1 students below projection, pull due to class config

At 20 FTES, 1 split and no overages

Pull of 1 FTE added from split reduction

Concord ES 4.5 1-

High 60%

1-High

18.0 17.0 (1.0) HP(1), -9 students below projection, potential language track issues

At 17 FTEs, 2 splits and 1 class overage (1 student)

Pull of 1 split reduction FTE in Mar

Dunlap ES 4.5 1-

High 56%

1-High

14.0 13.0 (1.0) HP(1), -19 students below projection

At 13 FTEs, 2 splits and 4 class overages

Gatzert ES 5.5 1-

High 58%

1-High

14.0 13.0 (1.0) HP(1), -17 students below projection

At 13 FTEs, 1 split and no overages

Highland Park

ES 6.0 1-

High 64%

1-High

17.0 16.0 (1.0)

HP(1), -37 students below projection

At 16 FTEs, 1 split and 2 overages (1 student). Could have be a pull of 2.0 FTEs

Keeping 1.0 FTE Mitigation segmentation level and high equity considerations (Mar)

Lowell ES 4.0 2-

Med 44%

2-Med

14.0 13.0 (1.0) -38 students below projection

At 13 FTEs, 2 splits and no overages


Martin Luther King Jr.

ES 6.0 1-

High 55%

1-High

15.0 14.0 (1.0) HP(1), -18 students below projection, pull due to class config

At 14 FTEs, no splits and 2 class overages or 1 split and no overages

Olympic View

ES 2.5 3-

Low 35%

2-Med

19.0 18.0 (1.0) HP(1), -27 students below projection, pull due to class config

At 18 FTEs, 1 split and 1 overage (1 student)

Pull from original allocation (Mar)

Sand Point ES 2.5 3-

Low 37%

2-Med

12.0 11.0 (1.0) -23 students below projection, pull due to class config

At 11 FTEs, 2 splits and 1 overage class (1 student)




(1): HP: "high poverty"classification is determined by OSPI based on October 2014 Free and Reduced lunch counts. The list of high poverty schools is posted on OSPI website,

under School Apportionment and Finance page (2):

Middle schools current FTE includes PCP

1.2: Pulls (Did not received FTE adds in August): (Continue)

Sch

oo

l

Sch

oo

l

Typ

e

Equ

ity

Fact

or

Nb

r

Equ

ity

Fact

or

Leve

l

% o

f B

elo

w

grad

e le

vel

stu

den

ts

Bel

ow

grad

e le

vel

Cu

rren

t FT

E

Rec

om

me

nd

ed n

ew

FTE

Rec

om

me

nd

atio

n

Ad

d/P

ull Reason-Summary

Wedgwood ES 0.0 3-

Low 10%

3-Low

20.0 19.0 (1.0) FTE

and 0.5 PCP

+16 students above projection, pull due to class config

At 19 FTEs, 1 split and 3 classes with overages (1 student)


West Seattle Elem.

ES 4.5 1-

High 62%

1-High

20.0 18.0 (2.0) HP(1), -54 students below projection, 2 FTE pull due to class config

At 18 FTEs, 2 splits and no overages

Pull from 1 FTE for expected enrollment growth

Madrona K8 4.5 1-

High 56%

1-High

16.0 15.0 (1.0)

-9 students below projection, pull due to class config

At 15 FTEs, 2 splits and 1 class overage (1 student)

1.0 FTE pull from 3.0 FTE added for splits and small school configuration

Denny Intl. MS 3.0 2-

Med 46%

1-High


Jane Addams MS

MS 2.0 3-

Low 25%

3-Low

33.0 31.5 (1.5) -55 students below projection.

School still have the 1.3 mitigation granted due to new school and geo split needs

Whitman MS 2.0 3-

Low 33%

2-Med


Pull of 2.0 Fte is from original allocation (Mar)

(1): HP: "high poverty classification is determined by OSPI based on October 2014 Free and Reduced lunch counts. The list of high poverty schools is posted on OSPI website, under School Apportionment and Finance page (2): Middle schools current FTE includes PCP (3): Pull the 1.0 FTE added in August



1.3: Pulls (Received FTE adds in August): Sc

ho

ol

Sch

oo

l

Typ

e

Equ

ity

Fact

or

Nb

r

Equ

ity

Fac

tor

Leve

l

% o

f B

elo

w

grad

e le

vel

stu

den

ts

Bel

ow

gra

de

leve

l

Cu

rren

t FT

E

Rec

om

men

ded

n

ew F

TE

Rec

om

men

dat

io

n A

dd

/Pu

ll

Reason-Summary

Bryant ES 0.0 3-

Low 10%

3-Low


At 24 FTEs, 1 split and no overages (3)

K-8 STEM at Boren

K8 2.0 3-

Low 40%

2-Med


At 16 FTE, no splits and 1 overage class (1 student) (3)

Laurelhurst ES 1.0 3-

Low 25%

3-Low


At 17 FTEs, 1 split and no overages (3)

At 18 FTEs, no split and no overages (3)

North Beach ES 1.0 3-

Low 23%

3-Low


At 12 FTE, 2 splits and no overages (3)

Queen Anne ES 0.5 3-

Low 13%

3-Low

19.0 18.0 (1.0)

-29 students below projection

August approved add of 1 FTE (18 FTEs) and 1 SOS Sub. It was turned into 2.0 FTE adds (19.0 FTEs)

At 17 FTEs, 2 splits and 5 overage classes (3)

Roxhill ES 5.5 1-

High 66%

1-High

16.0 14.0 (2.0)

FTE and 0.5 PCP

HP(1), -69 students below projection

At 14 FTE, no splits and no overage classes (3)

Broadview-Thomson

K8 3.0 2-

Med 46%

1-High

27.0 25.0 (2.0) HP(1), -41 below projection, 2 FTE pull due to class config

At 25 FTE, 2 splits and no overages (3)

(1): HP: "high poverty classification is determined by OSPI based on October 2014 Free and Reduced lunch counts. The list of high poverty schools is posted on OSPI website, under School Apportionment and Finance page (2): Middle schools current FTE includes PCP (3): Pull the 1.0 FTE added in August



1.4: Start off School Substitute: Do not keep the SOS Sub Sc

ho

ol

Sch

oo

l

Typ

e

Equ

ity

Fact

or

Nb

r

Equ

ity

Fac

tor

Leve

l

% o

f B

elo

w

grad

e le

vel

stu

den

ts

Bel

ow

gra

de

leve

l

Cu

rren

t FT

E

Rec

om

men

de

d n

ew F

TE Reason-Summary

Emerson ES 5.0 1-High 67% 1-High 14.0 14.0 HP(1), -16 students below projection

At 14 FTE, 1 split and 3 overage class (1 students)

Keeping 2.0 FTE added for split reduction (Mar)

Green Lake ES 1.0 3-Low 20% 3-Low 13.0 13.0 +7 students above projection. Do not require additional FTE due to

class config

At 13 FTE, works under unique school configuration

John Hay ES 1.0 3-Low 20% 3-Low 20.0 20.0

+7 students above projection. Do not require additional FTE due to class config

At 20 FTE, 2 split and no overage class

Received 1 FTE in Aug. It will keep a 1.0 FTE added for split reduction (Mar)

Schmitz Park

ES 0.5 3-Low 26% 2-Med 26.0 26.0

+1 student above projection

Do not require additional FTE due to class config

At 26 FTEs, 2 splits and 4 class overages

West Woodland

ES 0.0 3-Low 12% 3-Low 21.0 21.0 +11 students above projection. Do not require additional FTE due to

class config

At 21 FTE, 2 split and 2 overage classes

Washington MS 2.0 3-Low 36% 2-Med 43.5 43.5 8 students below projection. Do not require additional FTE due to class

config

Keeping 2.0 FTE added for split reduction (Mar)

(1): HP: "high poverty classification is determined by OSPI based on October 2014 Free and Reduced lunch counts. The list of high poverty schools is posted on OSPI website, under School Apportionment and Finance page (2): Middle schools current FTE includes PCP



(3): Pull the 1.0 FTE added in August

Documents

Seattle Schools Staffing Adjustment Appendix 2015