Upload
patricia-foxworthy
View
215
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Self-Determination Theory in Practice
University of MichiganGeoffrey Williams, MD, PhD
Healthy Living Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, US
May 13, 2013
Causes of Death In the USMokdad et al, JAMA, 2004
Cause Number Percentage
Tobacco 435,000 18%
Diet & Activity 400,000 17%
Alcohol 85,000 4%
Microbial agents 75,000 3%
Toxic agents 55,000 2%
Motor Vehicle Crash 43,000 2%
Firearms 29,000 1%
Sexual Behavior 20,000 1%
Overview of Self-Determination Theory and Health
Self Determination Theory Overview Define Motivation as energy directed toward a goal Assumptions: innate aspects of self, needs Motivation and Medical Professionalism Incentives AND/OR Internalization to motivate change SDT Model for Health Behavior Change Meta-analysis
Randomized controlled trials - SDT Tobacco abstinence Physical activity, weight loss Dental outcomes
Implications for research, medical ethics, clinicians and policy.
Self-Determination Theory
An organismic dialectic-individuals in the context of their social surrounding
Motivation is human energy directed to a goal Uses free choice paradigm Assumptions: humans are innately motivated
toward well-being (e.g., health) and personal growth
Psychological Needs
Needs are defined as:
“psychological nutriments that are essential for ongoing psychological growth, integrity, and well-being”
Deci & Ryan, 2000. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
Psychological Needs: Supporting Optimal Motivation
Autonomy the need to feel choiceful and volitional in one’s behavior
Competence the need to feel optimally challenged and capable of
achieving outcomes
Relatedness the need to feel connected to and understood by important
others
Deci & Ryan, 1991, 2000Ryan & Deci, 2000
Autonomy vs Independence Autonomy has two definitions:
– Volition: willingness to act for oneself (even in relation to others’ intentions)
Associated with motivation, positive affect, better health
People can want to stop smoking, and can accept that others want them to stop, too. Consistent with SDT.
– Independence: to act without input from others Inconsistent with SDT—does not meet relatedness
need
Medicine’s Social Surround is our Code of Biomedical Ethics
“These “ethics” are stated obligations of the health profession and its professionals, and are intended to ensure that patients who enter relationships with physicians will find them competent and trustworthy to provide expert advice to the patient and society on matters of health.”
Beauchamp & Childress, 2009
Medical Professionalism – A Physician Charter & Biomedical Ethics
Primacy of patient welfare: a dedication to serving patients’ interests.
Patient autonomy: To empower patients to make informed decisions
Social justice: To eliminate discrimination
ABIM Foundation, 2002
Motivation
Autonomous Motivation Behaviors are chosen and volitional Behaviors are performed for their inherent value
Controlled Motivation Behaviors are pressured or coerced Behaviors are performed for some separable outcome
Ryan & Deci, 2000; Deci & Ryan, 1991, 1995; Sheldon et al., 1997; Nix et al., 1999; Ryan et al., 1995
The Role of Needs Support in Autonomous Motivation
Keys to facilitating autonomy: elicit & acknowledge feelings & perspectives provide a menu of effective options
Emphasize choice when options are present
provide meaningful rationale support patient initiations to change
Expect failure in behavior change, reframe
minimize control
Deci et al., 2006
The Role of Needs Support in Relatedness Motivation
Keys to facilitating relatedness: unconditional positive regard
nonjudgmental stance continued relationship over time
warm positive relationship develop empathy
elicit & acknowledge patient perspective
The Role of Needs Support in Competence Motivation
Keys to facilitating perceived competence: high levels of autonomy be positive that the patient can succeed provide effectance feedback identify barriers skills-building/problem-solving build a plan with appropriate levels of challenge
Needs support is important because…
Internalization
an inherent, proactive process by which autonomous and competence motivations are increased naturally over time
Social Contextual Factors That Undermine Autonomous Motivation
SDT meta-analysis of over 128 RCTS in lab Tangible Rewards Threat of punishment Deadlines Evaluations Competitions
Deci, Koestner & Ryan, 1999
Effects of Rewards and Punishments
Cohen’s d k
All people got expected rewards
-0.36 92
When people got less that max reward
-0.88 6
When some people got no reward
-0.95 1
Verbal Rewards 0.33 21
Deci Koestner & Ryan, 1999
Williams, et al., Diabetes Educator. 2009;35(3):484-92
Path Model:Motivation, Adherence, Health
HCCQ Aut. Motiv. Competence
Qual. of Life
Adhere
Gly. Contr.
HbA1c Gluc.
.42*** .29***.35***
.15*** -.33***
-.31***
.93*** .67***
Fit Indices χ2= 149.5; df= 33 χ2 /df= 4.53 IFI/CFI= .97 TLI= .94 RMSEA= .03
Non HDL Chol
SDT Meta-Analysis
We conducted a meta-analysis of studies within the health care and health promotion contexts based on (figures on next slide)…
SDT model of behaviour change Figure 1; Ryan, Patrick, Deci & Williams, 2008
Ng, Ntoumanis, Thøgersen-Ntoumani, Deci, Ryan, Duda, & Williams (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science.
SDT Meta-AnalysisMethods
184 data sets from 165 sources (journal articles, theses, etc.)
correlation coefficients were meta-analyzed using methods by Hunter & Schmidt (2004)
Ng, Ntoumanis, Thøgersen-Ntoumani, Deci, Ryan, Duda, & Williams (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science.
SDT Meta-AnalysisCorrelations- Mental Health
Needs Support Auto. Mot. Perc. Comp.
Depressive Sx -.23 (5) -.06 (6) -.23 (6)
Anxiety -.23 (4) -.09 (3) -.32 (7)
Qual. of Life .22 (2) .22 (1) .40 (2)
Vitality .35 (4) .26 (2) .43 (5)
Auto. Mot. .39 (15) ----- .59 (38)
Perc. Comp. .31 (32) .59 (38) -----
SDT Meta-AnalysisCorrelations-Physical Health
Needs Support Auto. Mot. Perc. Comp.
Tobacco Abs. .12 (4) .16 (6) .29 (3)
Physical Act. .23 (30) .20 (16) .35 (31)
Wt loss .28 (2) .38 (3) .22 (3)
Dental .38 (3) .23 (3) .53 (2)
Med Adhere .08 (2) .11 (4) .17 (3)
Healthy diet .29 (3) .41 (7)) .07 (2)
SDT Meta-Analysis
Figure 3. Path diagram of Williams et al.’s (2002, 2006) model using meta-analyzed correlations (n = 13,356). All paths are significant at p < .05; residual variances are omitted for presentation simplicity.
2 (3) = 76.25, p < .01, CFI = .98, RMSEA = .07, SRMR = .03.
Self-Determination Theory (SDT) Meta-Analysis Limitations
Correlations are bidirectional and thus do not support causal interpretation of the results.
Biomedical Ethics mandates respect for autonomy-thus directionality is irrelevant.
However, 6 previous RCTs with SDT-based health interventions designed to respect patient autonomy have been shown to increase patient perceptions of autonomy and competence and improve outcomes in: tobacco abstinence (Williams et al, J General Internal Medicine, 2006; Williams et al, Health Psychology, 2006; & Williams et
al, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2009)
dental outcomes (Halvari & Halvari, Mot.& Emot. , 2006; Health Psych ,In Press)
physical activity (Fortier et al., Psychology of Sport And Exercise, 2007)
weight loss (Silva et al, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2011)
Ng, Ntoumanis, Thøgersen-Ntoumani, Deci, Ryan, Duda, & Williams (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science.
Smoker’s Health Study Design
Randomized controlled trial of 30 mo. N=1,006
Questionnaire assessments: * autonomous motivation * perceived competence * autonomy support
Outcomes:* Took Medication* Tobacco Abstinence at 6, 18, and 30 months* Reduction in % calories from fat, LDL-C
Williams, McGregor et al., Health Psychology. 2006;25(1): 91-101.
The Intervention
The clinical endpoint of the intervention was to guide the patient to making a clear choice about whether he wanted to change or not.
If the patient wanted to stop smoking or change diet then the clinician provided competence training on how to reach that goal.
Baseline Autonomous Motivation
1-month Autonomy
Support
18-month Cessation
.14**
.05+
.40** .34**
.33** .52**
Medication Taking
.19**
.32**
.68**
Note: Model Fit: adequately χ2(248) = 1193.14, p < .001, CFI = .92, IFI = .92, RMSEA = .066 ; Values represent standardized path estimates. + p = .10; * p < .05; ** p < .01.
Baseline Perceived
Competence
6-month Autonomous Motivation
6-month Perceived
Competence
All Patients Odds Ratio PHS Odds Ratio
6-month 7-day Point Prevalence 2.9 2.5
Patients who Did Not Want to Quit Odds Ratio
6-month 7-day Point Prevalence 2.7
All Patients Odds Ratio
12-month Prolonged Abstinence at 18-months 2.6
Patients with Elevated LDL-C Intervention Control p-Value
18-month Change in LDL-C 8.0 mg/dl 4.0 mg/dl < 0.05
Health Outcomes at 6-months and 18-months
Group treatment for overweight and obese women, centered on physical activity motivation and...
...based on Self-Determination Theory
RCT: 1-year intervention + 2-year follow-up (n=239)
Main Outcomes/Mediators: Exercise Motivation (Intrinsic/Autonomous), PA/Exercise (1y), Weight (2 to 3 years)
The “PESO” study
Silva et al. (2008) BMC Public Health 8:234
Silva et al. (2010) J Behav Med 33:110
Silva et al. (2010) Psych Sport Exerc 11: 591
Teixeira et al. (2010) Obesity 18:725
No fixed exercise prescription!
Provide options, active experimentation
Include challenging PA opportunities
Promote personally-meaningful activities
Ask for leadership, autonomy in organizing
Three-month dance curriculum
Walking/pedometers, safety, skills,...
Exercise-specific Elements
Promote Intrinsic Motivation, Autonomy
Silva, Markland, et al., BMC Public Health 2008;8(1), 234.
Physical Activity at 3 years
p
Moderate + Vig. PA (min/wk) 234 221 148 162 0.009
Walking (steps/day) 8837 3661 7999 3823 0.206
Lifestyle PA Index (dif. 0-36 mo) 0.75 0.88 0.39 0.70 0.002
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Intervention Control
Minutes of moderate and vigorous PA
Net difference: +86 min/wk
Teixeira et al., (in preparation)
% W
eigh
t Cha
nge
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
Intervention Control
Error Bars Show 95.0% CI of Mean
Baseline 12 Months 24 Months 36 Months
- 7.4%
- 1.7% - 2.0%
- 5.6%
- 1.4%
- 3.9%
3-year weight change (completers-only)
Difference: 3.9%
Average: -5.6%
Average: -1.7%
Teixeira et al., (in preparation)
Group treatment for overweight and obese women, changed motivation, phys activity, and weight 36 months after intervention
Autonomy, and Competence Mediated the effect of the Intervention on: PA/Exercise, and Weight
Effect was large enough to be clinically important for diabetes prevention and reducing blood pressure
Summary “PESO”
Dental Study 86 university students (21-35 yrs., X = 27.34
yr., SD = 3.99) A randomised two-group field experiment pre-
and post-measures of: autonomous self-regulation perceived competence oral health outcomes (plaque & gingivites)
Halvari & Halvari, 2006, Motivation & Emotion
.39*** .43*** .13
.41***
-.42*** .49***
.24* .20* .33**
.30**
PlaqueT1
Perceivedcompetence
T3
Autonomy support
T2
Perceivedcompetence
T1
Autonomousmotivation
T3
Autonomousmotivation
T1
GingivitisT1
Healthbehavior
T3
PlaqueT3
GingivitisT3
Munster -Halvari & Halvari (2006). Motivation and Emotion, 30, 294-305
Munster Halvari, et al., (2012). Health Psychology.
Clinical Implications Medical Professionalism, and biomedical
ethics indicate that promoting patient autonomy is a primary outcome of the clinical encounter.
Empirical evidence from 184 health related studies indicate:that supporting psychological needs enhancesautonomy, competence and relatedness which, in turn,predict mental and physical health & QOL
Clinical Implications Health Care Practitioners who learn to support
psychological needs: Elicit perspectives (listen) Acknowledge affect (reflect) Provide effective options for change Provide clear advice (rationale) for change Support initiative for change Minimize control and remain non-judgmental Skills build/problem solve with those willing Provide a positive relationship
May be more likely to motivate change, health, and improve quality of life for their patients.
Research Implications & Summary Interventions may have a greater impact if centered
around facilitating internalization of patient autonomy and competence.
Research may not inform clinical care until it includes the following: Autonomy as an outcome of care With a free choice period in the study design Includes those that don’t want to change
Health Policy Implications
Health policy interventions may have a greater impact if delivered in a manner that supports patient autonomy, competence and relatedness that would facilitate the internalization of a value for the health behavior.
“We recommend adults to get a minimum of 30 minutes of moderate level physical activity most if not all days per weeks, and two 30 minute sessions of resistance training to maintain your health. Are you willing to do that?
Virtual Clinicians
We offer intensive interventions that increase motivation to take medications and make lifestyle changes for Tobacco dependence 4-8 visits 30-300 min. Hyperlipidemia – 6 visits 3 MD, 3 RD Weight Loss – 22 visits
Virtual Clinician
3 NIH grants to develop and test VC’s NIDA – research tool “VCRT”
R21-DA024262
NHLBI – SBIR Clinical Advisory Tool- ICAT
R44HL097506
LM – Virtual Weight Loss RC1-LM010410
Hypotheses Can we deliver intensive intervention
content with a VC for patients? At home In the waiting room On Smart Phone
Can we increase well being and autonomy for same or lower cost?
Can we adapt intervention for culture gender, and race to eliminate disparities?
Next Steps
Behavioral Economics and Motivation based interventions
Effect of presenting health risk information on motivation and adherence
SDT model for change in cholesterol and blood pressure management
Motivation of health care practitioners
Thank You!
Citation
Ng, J., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumanis, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., & Williams, G. C. (2012). Self-Determination Theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 325-340.
References ABIM Foundation. (2009). Medical professionalism in the new millennium: A physician charter. Annals of
Internal Medicine, 136(3), 243-246. Beauchamp, T. L. & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press. Cahill, K., & Perera, R. (2011). Competitions and incentives for smoking cessation (Review). The Cochrane
Library. Deci, E. L., La Guardia, J. G., Moller, A. C., Scheiner, M. J., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). On the benefits of giving as
well as receiving autonomy support: Mutuality in close friendships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 313-327.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy: The basis for true self-esteem. In M. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency and self-esteem (pp. 31-49). New York: Plenum Publishing Co.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
Moller, A. C., McFadden, H. G., Hedeker, D., & Spring, B. (2012). Financial motivation undermines maintenance in an intensive diet & activity intervention. Journal of Obesity, epub ahead of print.
References Ng, J., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumanis, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., & Williams, G. C.
(2012). Self-Determination Theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 325-340.
Nix, G. A., Ryan, R. M., Manly, J. B., & Deci, E. L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: The effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 266-284.
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychology, 55(1), 68-78.
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Grolnick. W. S. (1995). Autonomy, relatedness, and the self: Their relation to development and psychopathology. In D. Cichetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychology – Vol. 1: Theory and methods (pp.618-655). New York: Wiley.
Sebire, S. J., Standage, M., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2008). Development and validation of the goal content for exercise questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 353-377.
Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Rawsthorne, L. J., & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the big five personality trails and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1380-1393.
The Contract with Society Nonmaleficence (a norm of avoiding the causation of harm)-
Hippocrates 400 BC Beneficence (a group of norms of pertaining to relieving,
lessening, or preventing harm and providing benefits and balancing benefits against risks and costs). Percival 1802
Justice (a group of norms for fairly distributing benefits, risks, and costs) - 2000 Medical Ethics & Professionalism
Respect for Autonomy (a norm of respecting and supporting autonomous decisions). 2000 AD
Beauchamp & Childress 2009