61
Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant [email protected]

Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-Monitoring

Deb Childs, Ph.D.Tier 2 [email protected]

Page 2: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Session Overview

• What is self-monitoring?• What does the research tell us?• Steps for implementing self-monitoring • Self-monitoring as a classroom support• Self-monitoring as a Tier 2 intervention• Self-monitoring as a fading procedure for a

Tier 2 intervention

Page 3: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-Management

Strategies

Self-Monitoring InterventionsStudent self-observes and self-records target behavior

Goal Setting InterventionsStudent creates behavior targets (goals)

Self-Evaluation InterventionsStudent assesses behavior against a set standard

Self-Instruction InterventionsStudent uses self-statements to direct behavior

Strategy Instruction InterventionsStudent follows a series of steps to complete a task

autonomously

Page 4: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

What is Self-Monitoring?

A process of self-observation and recording of a skill.

• Student must be able to discriminate the occurrence of the behavior

• Student must have the skill in their repertoire

Page 5: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

What does the Research Tell Us?

• Effective for ALL students K-adult (Jolivette & Ramsey, 2006)

• Is effective as a classroom system of behavior management (Carr & Punzo, 1993)

• May be used with academic and behavior skills (Shapiro & Cole, 1994)

Page 6: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

What does the Research Tell Us?

• Is less invasive than teacher managed strategies (Fantuzzo, Polite, Cook, & Quinn, 1988)

• May be more effective than teacher managed strategies for some students (Shapiro, DuPaul & Bradley-Klug, 1998)

Page 7: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

What does the Research Tell Us?

• Contributes to the acquisition of self-regulation which is the crossover skill between academics and behavior (Wery & Nietfeld, 2010)

Page 8: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Steps for Implementing Self-Monitoring

1. Identify target behavior2. Define the target behavior3. Collect baseline data4. Design procedure and materials5. Teach student to self monitor6. Monitor progress7. Follow up and fade

Page 9: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-monitoring as a Classroom Intervention

• Discuss goal setting with class• Each student chooses a skill or behavior to improve

(may need coaching from teacher)• Skill is defined and written in positive terms• Collect and chart baseline if available• Set goals• Determine when and where skill will be monitored and

chart to be used to keep data• Teach how to self-monitor (check for agreement)• Follow up

Page 10: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

1. Identify Target Behavior

• State in positive terms– What do you want the student to do?

• Consider where and when the behavior occurs– This will help determine the location or type of

activity to monitor

Page 11: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Activity

• Think about a skill or activity you would like to improve

• Write it on a piece of paper• If you feel comfortable, share it with an elbow

partner

Page 12: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

2. Define the Target Behavior

• Use the OMPUA guidelines to help you– Observable, measureable, positively stated,

understandable, always applicable • The skill must be in the student’s repertoire

– Self-monitoring is used for performance deficits not acquisition deficits.

• Include any steps associated with the skill

Page 13: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Examples of defined target behavior

• Respect others = Use good words, keep hands and feet to self, ask to use others’ belongings

• Be responsible = Go to class on time, bring needed items, put your things away when done

• Follow directions = Listen to what you are being asked to do, ask questions if you need to, begin the task

Page 14: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Examples of defined academic skills

• Be able to recite/write times tables 1 – 10 by Jan. 15th

• Read 5 books a week at the 3.0 level or above and complete comprehension questions at 80% or above.

• Complete all homework to 80% criteria

Page 15: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Activity

• Write your target behavior using OMPUA guidelines

• List any steps associated with your target• If you feel comfortable, share it with an elbow

partner

Page 16: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

3. Collect Baseline Data

How often does the target behavior occur:• Frequency counts – record each time behavior

occurs or look at permanent products• Time sampling – observing the occurrence or

non-occurrence of the target behavior during a fixed amount of time

• 3-5 data points • Graph analysis for visual evaluation.

Page 17: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Baseline warnings

• Look for the easiest and least time consuming way to determine approximate frequency of behavior.

• Do not have student collect their own baseline• If you or a peer collect baseline, target student

should not be aware it is being collected.

Page 18: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

• Do you have past records associated with your skill that allows you to collect baseline?

Page 19: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

4. Design Procedure and Materials

• Determine when the students will self-monitor.– How will students be cued to do so?

• Create self-monitoring chart.– Should be age appropriate– List the target behavior and any steps needed to

complete the skill– Have an area to write goal

Self monitoring chart samples

Page 20: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-Monitoring Daily Progress Report

Student Name ______________________ Date ________________

Tasks Completed

Monday

Ck

Tasks Completed

Tuesday

Ck

Tasks Completed

Wed

Ck

Tasks Completed Thursday

Ck

Tasks Completed

Friday

Ck

Reading Out of Out of Out of Out of Out of

Math Out of Out of Out of Out of Out of

Social Studies

Out of Out of Out of Out of Out of

Science Out of Out of Out of Out of Out of

Total for the day ____/_____ Goal ___________________ Parent/Guardian Signature ___________________________ I’m proud of you today because __________________________________________

Page 21: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Writing Assignment Checklist

Place a check next to the items completed.

Name______________________ Class____________ Date__________

All sentences begin with a capital letter. All sentences have correct punctuation at the end. All sentences have a subject and a verb (are complete sentences) The first word of the paragraph is indented The paragraph has a topic sentence All sentences in the paragraph are on the same topic I followed instructions for the assignment I completed all parts of the assignment

The goal for this writing assignment is_________

Page 22: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Tier 2/Self-Monitoring Daily Progress Report

Student Name ______________________ Date ________________

3 = 0-1 reminder 2 = 2 reminders 1 = 3+ reminders

Be Safe Keep hands & feet

to self

Teacher

check

Be Respectful Follow directions

Teacher Check

Be Responsible Use materials appropriately

Teacher Check

8:30 to Morning Break 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

Morning Break to Lunch 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

Lunch to Afternoon Break 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

Afternoon Break to Dismissal 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

Total for the day _________________/36 Parent/Guardian Signature ___________________________ I’m proud of you today because __________________________________________

Page 23: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Activity

• How often will you monitor your skill?• Design a simple chart you would use to

monitor. Make sure it lists needed steps.• Determine a goal• Share with an elbow partner

Page 24: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

5. Teach Students to Self-Monitor

• Discuss with individual students their target skill or have students discuss in pairs

• Allow students to set goals – refer back to first lesson on goal setting

• Create cueing system if needed• Allow time at the end of the designated period

for completing chart and graphing results

Deb Childs

Page 25: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Activity

• What will you use to remind yourself to self-monitor?– Phone alarm?– Friend?– Spouse?– Sticky note on mirror?

Deb Childs

Page 26: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

6. Monitor Progress

• Positive feedback given for student accurately assessing and recording until teacher and student agree at least 80% of the time – May use peers to check accuracy

• Teacher/peer check of accuracy is faded to periodic checks (1/5 average)

• Adult provides specific verbal feedback when target skill is displayed.

Page 27: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Activity

• How often will you review your progress?

Deb Childs

Page 28: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

7. Follow up and Fade

• Reteach or review skills as needed• Review progress and celebrate success

– Having student graph progress allows for quick visual evaluation and may increase student rate of improvement (Harris, Graham, Reid, McElroy, & Hamby, 1994)

• When student is consistently using skill and attaining goal, reduce the times per week that student monitors

• Periodically check for maintenance

Page 29: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Activity

• What reinforcement or rewards will you give yourself for attaining goal?

Deb Childs

Page 30: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-monitoring as a Class-wide Intervention

• Same steps• Target skill is the same for all students• Each student contributes to attaining goal

Deb Childs

Page 31: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

1. Identify Target Behavior

• If applied to the whole class, how would you determine target?– Records of minor discipline problems– Informal observations– Student suggestion box or class meetings– Goals of curriculum

Deb Childs

Page 32: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

2. Define the Target Skill

• Discuss with the entire class the importance of the skill

• Examples and Non-examples

Deb Childs

Page 33: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

3. Collect Baseline

• Have baseline on target skill collected and graphed

• Share with class current level of skill

Deb Childs

Page 34: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

4. Design Procedures and Materials

• Create chart or graph• Determine time frame for data to be collected• Determine which students will be in charge of

charting or graphing skill• Determine cueing system or when students

will complete chart• Set goal

Deb Childs

Page 35: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

5. Teach Students to Self-monitor

• Check chosen students’ accuracy of completing chart

• Reinforce for accuracy even if students did not meet goal

• Fade checks as soon as students are consistently accurate

Deb Childs

Page 36: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

6. Monitor Progress

• Check chart regularly for reinforcement and goal adjusting

• Reteach as needed

Deb Childs

Page 37: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

7. Follow-up and Fade

• When goal is met for 4 consecutive weeks begin fading frequency of checks

• When goal is met for 4 consecutive weeks consider changing to a new behavior

Deb Childs

Page 38: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Class-wide Example

7th grade class was consistently late to class:1. Gathered baseline (67% on time)2. Defined “on time” and discussed importance

of skill and barriers to attaining.3. Assigned 2 students to monitor class progress

and set goal of 80% average for the week4. Reinforced when goal attained and goal was

increased until class was consistently at 99%

Page 39: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-Monitoring as a Tier 2 Intervention

1. Data is used to determine common skill deficits of students needing Tier 2 interventions.

2. Skill is defined and any steps are listed 3. Procedures and materials are designed

– Monitoring form is created targeting replacement behavior (taken from matrix)

– Time frame and cueing procedures determined

Page 40: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Activity

• Discuss with those at your table:– Most common problem behavior according to

your most recent Big 5 Report.– What is the replacement behavior taught?– Can you name students in your building that

display the problem behavior regularly?– Where is the behavior usually occurring?

Page 41: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Monitoring Form Example

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday

Period 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 Period 2 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 Period 3 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 Period 4 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 Period 5 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 Period 6 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

Name__________________ Goal______________________________________________Respect others by:1. Using kind words2. Keep hands and feet to self3. Ask to use their things

3 – I followed all steps with 0 or 1 reminder, 2- I followed all steps with 2 reminders, 1 – I needed multiple reminders or did not demonstrate skill

Page 42: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-Monitoring as a Tier 2 Intervention

4. Students are taught process for self- monitoring and target skill(s) are reviewed.

Could be done as a group review Skill should have been taught as part of matrix

5. Staff is taught to check and reinforce initial accuracy of student self-monitoring.

What is your process for informing and training staff concerning tier 2 interventions?

Page 43: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Discussion Activity

• Who in your building would be available to train a group of students? (about 30 min)

• Who would train staff on how to check student accuracy and how to fade those checks?

Page 44: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-Monitoring as a Tier 2 Intervention

6. Student progress is reviewed and feedback given on a regular basis

– Students graph results– Goal should be set and increased as appropriate– Reinforcement for goal attainment by an adult if

attention maintained or student is taught to self reinforce.

7. Intervention is faded once final goal is attained– Don’t forget to celebrate

Celebrate

Page 45: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Decision Making Activity

• Who would be responsible for collecting student data?

• Who would be responsible for reinforcing students for attaining goal?

• How long would a student self-monitor and attain target goal before the intervention would be faded?

Page 46: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Tier 2 Intervention Example

Tier 2 sample chart

1. Data indicate students at risk are having problems with following directions and staying on task

2. Behaviors defined:– Following directions = Listen to the direction, ask

questions if needed, do what is asked– Staying on task = Look at teacher if instructing, stay in

area, do your work

3. Collect baseline – teacher completes self monitoring chart for 1 week

Page 47: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Tier 2 Intervention Example

4. Location, time, and cueing procedure determined

5. Student is trained in self-monitoring and skills reviewed

6. Teacher checks accuracy of student self-monitoring until 80% and then slowly fades support. Data is collected

7. Teacher periodically checks accuracy and intervention is faded.

Page 48: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-monitoring as a Modification of CICO

• Student checks in at beginning of day and receives CICO monitoring form with school expectations

• Student completes rating of behavior at the end of each period with teacher checking until they agree 80% of the time

• Student completes rating of behavior at the end of each period with teacher fading checks until random and around 1/5.

• Student checks out at end of day

Page 49: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-monitoring as a modification of CICO

• Student is reinforced for attaining goal according to function of behavior

• This modification is not designed for attention seeking students

Page 50: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-monitoring as a modification of CICO

Be SafeKeep hands & feet to

self

Teachercheck

Be RespectfulFollow directions

TeacherCheck

Be ResponsibleUse materials appropriately

TeacherCheck

8:30 to Morning Break

3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

Morning Break to Lunch

3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

Lunch to Afternoon Break

3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

Afternoon Break to Dismissal

3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

Page 51: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-monitoring to Generalize Small Group Social Skills

• Students are taught social skills as part of small group social skills (SGSS)

• Skills completed are listed (with steps) on monitoring form

• Student completes form with teacher checks • Teacher fades checks until average 1/5• Monitoring form is turned in to SGSS

instructor for reinforcement

Page 52: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-monitoring Social Skills Targeted Skills Monday Teacher

checkTuesday Teacher

checkWednesday Teacher

checkThursday Teacher

checkFriday Teacher

check

Use nice words 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

Share 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

Take Turns 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

Ask to use other’s things

3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

Stay calm if you disagree

3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

Total Daily Points

Total Possible Daily

Page 53: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-Monitoring as a Fading Procedure

1. Used when student has attained final goal on a Tier 2 intervention for a minimum of 4 weeks

2. Use same form as used for daily progress (DPR) but ask student to complete with teacher checking for accuracy

3. Once student is accurately monitoring at least 80% of the time slowly reduce the frequency of teacher checks.

4. Continue progress monitoring and adjust support as needed.

Page 54: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Fading Example

• Check in Check out – Instead of teacher completing DPR at designated times, student is asked to complete and teacher indicates agreement. – Teacher feedback is slowly faded until student is

independently completing DPR– Data is kept based on student completion of DPR– Teacher periodically checks accuracy

Page 55: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Fading ExampleFirst Phase = Student Learns to Self-Assess

– Teacher & student rate student’s behavior simultaneously– Compare ratings at end of each class period– Success = match in ratings (even if low rating)– If discrepancy in score, discuss– Teacher rating assumed accurate– Provide reinforcer for accuracy & honesty (SW ticket)

*Goal is for student rating to get closer to teacher rating until student is reliable and accurate in rating own behavior (80-85% agreement between teacher & student)

Page 56: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Fading Example

Second Phase = Teacher Rating Removed• Begins once student demonstrates consistency

in accurately rating own behavior• Gradually remove teacher rating component

– Week 1 = teacher rates 4 out of 5 days– Week 2 = teacher rates 3 out of 5 days

*On days when teacher does not rate, student ratings are used for data collection and progress monitoring

Page 57: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Fading Example

• Check-in/Check-out continues throughout self monitoring process– Teacher DPR ratings are used on teacher rating days– Student DPR ratings are used on student rating days

• Coordinator collects, enters and analyzes data• Data collection is critical!• If behavior deteriorates, it may be too early to

remove student

Page 58: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Fade Out of CICO

Phase 1: Teacher and student score together Compare ratings at the end of each class period

match=success, discrepancy=discussion and teacher’s rating assumed accurate

Provide reinforcement for accuracy and honesty Check after 2 weeks

Phase 2: Teacher fades, student begins self-monitoring Week 1-Teacher rates 4 out of 5 days Week 2-Teacher rates 3 out of 5 days Week 3-Teacher rates 2 out of 5 days Week 4- Teacher rates 1 out of 5 days Week 5- Teacher rates 0 out of 5 days

Phase 3: Graduation

Weekly alumni check-out

Success to move to Phase 3 Student data stays at or above goal line

Success to move to Phase 2 2 weeks of 80-85% agreement

and Student data is at or above goal line

Westview Elementary and Winfield Primary Fading Examples

Westview Elementary SchoolExcelsior Springs School District

Page 59: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Self-Monitoring

• May be used in your classroom with each student working on an individual skill

• May be used class-wide – all students working on the same skill

• As a Tier 2 Intervention• As a modification to CICO• To help generalize Social Skills• As a fading procedure for a Tier 2 Intervention

Deb Childs

Page 60: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

Contact Information

Deb Childs Ph.D. Tier 2/3 ConsultantSWPBS

Page 61: Self-Monitoring Deb Childs, Ph.D. Tier 2 Consultant childsde@missouri.edu

References• Jolivette, K., & Ramsey, M. (2006). Students with emotional and behavioral disorders

can manage their own behavior. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(2), 14-21.• Carr, S., & Punzo, R., (1993). The effects of self-monitoring of academic accuracy and

productivity n the performance of students with behavioral disorder. Behavioral Disorders, 18(4), 241-250.

• Shapiro, E., & Cole, C. L., (1994). Behavior change in the Classroom. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

• Fantuzzo, J.W., Polite, K., Cook, D. M., & Quinn, G. (1988). An evaluation of the effectiveness of teacher- vs. student-managed interventions with elementary school students. Psychology in the Schools, 25, 154-163.

• Shapiro, E., DuPaul, G., & Bradley-Klug, K., (1998). Self-management as a strategy to improve the classroom behavior of adolescents with ADHD. Journal of Learning disabilities, 31(6), 545-556

• Wery, J., & Nietfeld,J. (2010). Supporting self-regulated learning with exceptional children. Teaching Exceptional Children 42(4), 70-78.

• Rafferty, L. (2010) Step-by-step: Teaching students to self-monitor. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(2), 50-58

• Harrris, K. R., Graham, S., Reid, R., McElroy, K., & Hamby, R. S. (1994). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of performance: Replication and cross-task comparison studies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 121-139.

Deb Childs