Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Seminar on Renewable Energy Technology implementation in Thailand
Experience transfer from Europe
co-organised by the Delegation of the European Union to Thailand and
the Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy
Waste to Energy: Public Participation
Paul Davison
4th October 2012
OUTLINE
• Background
– Paul Davison
– Waste management
– EfW
• What’s the problem with EfW?
– It’s not just the ‘W’ bit
– Key issues
– Protester responses
• Gaining positive public acceptance
– Positive engagement
– Three levels of communications
• Questions clinic
BACKGROUND
PROTEUS PR LTD
• Established in 1996
• An award-winning public relations consultancy
• Based in Oxfordshire, but working throughout the UK and Europe
• Have worked on environmental issues communications throughout the world
• Offering a full range of marketing communications services, with specialist experience in environmental PR
• Considerable waste management and energy experience working for waste companies, local and central government
• Planning support, strategic issues management, crisis management and effective community engagement
• Worked on more than 30 thermal energy projects including EfW, 1.2GW gas fired power station and a 300MW biomass plant and several waste projects, 30 wind farms
NEWSPAPER
ADVERTISEMENT 1912
PRE-1914 TURBINES
PERCEPTIONS = TRUTH
THE PERCEPTION
THE REALITY
SHOW THEM
THE DRAGON!
WHAT SHOULD
IT LOOK LIKE?
Boring!
Grimsby
UK
WHAT SHOULD
IT LOOK LIKE?
Theme Park!
Mishima,
Japan
WHAT SHOULD
IT LOOK LIKE?
Cool in Paris!
WHAT’S THE PROBLEM WITH
EfW?
- EMOTION vs SCIENCE
ITS NOT JUST AN
INCINERATOR!
It’s a win-win!
ENERGY FROM WASTE,
NOT
WASTE TO ENERGY
• Awareness of energy issues and climate change is increasing
• Focusing on the positive energy and waste management
outcomes of EfW is good, but it depends on who and when
• Is the benefit to energy generation and climate implications a
general panacea for EfW communications?
• Well, no actually, but it does help – it is a significant opportunity
THE PROBLEM IS
ALMOST ALWAYS
A LACK OF CONTEXT
• Some of these issues are dependent upon the maturity of the waste industry and its historical context
• But more often it’s all about who is doing the communications
• Plant operators often focused on gaining planning permission, dealing with stakeholder enquiries, and specifically their part of the waste chain
• Local government or collection authorities are interested in community engagement to deliver wastes in appropriate formats
• Central Governments are often too broad in their communications
• This lack of co-ordination is one of the main problems with a lack of context
• So why is this important…
CURRENTLY INCINERATION
IS A PROBLEM NOT A
SOLUTION
• Lack of context simply exposes your vested interest, you’re only
interested in one bit:
– Waste companies = The bit that makes you money
– Governments = Get a problem sorted quickly and quietly if possible
– Its what every is your vested interest
• This leads to a lack of trust
• So who does the public trust.......
WHO WOULD YOU
TRUST ON THE
ENVIRONMENT?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Politicians Industry Newspapers Government
services
Television Independent
scientists
Green
organisations
4% 5%
14% 23%
25%
60% 61%
WHAT’S THE
PROBLEM WITH
WASTE?
• In most countries waste and waste management is seen as a problem
and not a solution
• Waste is rarely perceived as a resource
• Waste is seen as dangerous to the environment and therefore
management facilities pose a high risk
• Until recently, waste management has always been someone else's
problem and communities have had little engagement, except near
waste facilities
• In reality most concerns are related to nuisance
WHAT’S THE
PROBLEM WITH EfW?
• In a word – incineration
• They tend to be large with big nuisance issues
– Emissions
– Visual impact
– Transport
– Smells, dust, etc
• Recently there has been a shift onto.....
– Energy efficiency
– Impact on property values
• Need to review the vested interest of near neighbours
– Impact on their amenity
– Impact on their vested interest
WHAT’S THE
PROBLEM WITH
EfW?...2
• Historical context
– Performance
– Need
• Cultural context
– Need
– Community benefit
EMOTIONAL
ENGAGEMENT
• EfW objections:
– Adversely affecting health and wellbeing
– Adversely affecting an individuals rights or vested interests
– Nothing positive for the individuals and a lack of control
– Impact on resource recovery……
RECYCLING
VERSUS EFW
EMOTIONAL
ENGAGEMENT
• Result:
– People will become emotionally involved in development issues
– They will look for any anti information and filter out positive messages
– They will stop listening and start shouting…..
MORE INTERNET EXPERTS
GET MARCHING
CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENT
MORE MEDIA
FRIENDLY
NETWORKING
PROTESTORS
TRADITIONAL
WASTE REACTIVE
COMMUNICATIONS
Protesters Issues Audience Story MEDIA
Stunts Waste
company
IMPLICATIONS
• Effective communications must demonstrate that the waste is the
problem and EfW is the opportunity
• Our communications can start with energy needs but only when the
context of EfW is generally established and understood, otherwise it
will be seen as a ‘smokescreen’ on what you are really up to which
is good old fashioned waste incineration and genuine benefits will
be lost on consumers
• The environmental benefit of EfW plants must include landfill
emissions avoidance or it will be positioned as a highly ineffective
way of generating power
• However, we should never forget that a lot changes with proximity to
the site......
MODEL OF LIKELY
NEGATIVE REACTION
TO A PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT
GE
NE
RA
L S
CA
LE
OF
NE
GA
TIV
E R
EA
CT
ION
RELATIVE DISTANCE AWAY
PROXIMITY TO PROPOSED FACILITY FACILITY
HERE
MODEL OF LIKELY
PUBLIC REACTION
GE
NE
RA
L S
CA
LE
OF
NE
GA
TIV
E R
EA
CT
ION
RELATIVE DISTANCE AWAY
PROXIMITY TO PROPOSED FACILITY
FACILITY
HERE
EfW FOR OXFORDSHIRE,
UK
Positive
Neutral
Negative
Chipping Banbury Ardley
Norton
(26 km) (14km)
WHERE IS
OXFORDSHIRE?
LONDON
LONDON
OXFORDSHIRE
WHERE IS
OXFORDSHIRE?
IMPLICATIONS
• First – need to think about who is the right messenger
• Second – need to think about where the audience ‘sits’ in relation
to the site
• Third – need communications to target a broader community
MODEL OF LIKELY
PUBLIC REACTION
GE
NE
RA
L S
CA
LE
OF
NE
GA
TIV
E R
EA
CT
ION
RELATIVE DISTANCE AWAY
PROXIMITY TO PROPOSED FACILITY
FACILITY
HERE
NOT JUST
HERE, BUT....
COMMUNICATE WITH
WHOLE COMMUNITY
GE
NE
RA
L S
CA
LE
OF
NE
GA
TIV
E R
EA
CT
ION
RELATIVE DISTANCE AWAY
PROXIMITY TO PROPOSED FACILITY FACILITY
HERE
Here!
GAINING POSITIVE PUBLIC
ACCEPTANCE
- A broader dialogue
THE PUBLIC’S VIEW
OF PLANNING
DECISION MAKING
THE FUNDAMENTAL
TRUTHS BEHIND
CONFLICTS
• People do not like change
• Especially if they feel they have no influence or control
• Perception is truth
– Today opinion has the same value as FACTS
• “What’s in it for them?”
– If they see no value to them, they are more likely to object
• How to ‘sell’ to consumers
SELLING ‘ANYTHING’
TO CONSUMERS
GENERATE DESIRE FOR SOLUTION
IDENTIFY
ISSUES
DEFINE
NEEDS
DELIVER
SOLUTION
WHAT’S THE PROBLEM
SATISFY DESIRE
CURRENT POSITION
We have always done
waste management like
this, why change?
SELLING ‘EfW’ TO
CONSUMERS
PO
SIT
IVE
CH
AN
GE
IN
UN
DE
RS
TA
ND
ING
AN
D B
EH
AV
IOU
R
SHORTEST TIME POSSIBLE
DEMONSTRATE
PROBLEMS
INCREASE AWARENESS
OF NEED/ISSUES
WIDESPREAD
COMMUNICATIONS
PROGRAMME TO ALL
STAKEHOLDERS
DEMONSTRATE
EFFECTIVENESS AND
PROVIDE FEEDBACK
GENERATE DESIRE FOR
PROPOSED SOLUTION
PROVEN EXPERIENCE
INCREASE
UNDERSTANDING OF
OPTIONS AND PROCESS
LANDFILL AVOIDENCE
SPECIFY TIMEFRAME
ROLE OF RECYCLING AND
RESIDUAL WASTE
IMPLICATIONS
• First – there is a problem – Deliver historical context – ‘How did it come to this?”
– It cannot continue
• Second – it involves the public at every level – It’s their waste!!!!
– They must have a role in solving the problem
• Third – if we can deliver the solution it will benefit everyone – It will reduce waste and make better use of resources
– It will clearly benefit the environment
– Effective waste management is a positive environmental opportunity
THREE STEPS TO
SUCCESS
• Step 1 – National level debate – Government advisors/independent scientists – energy security and
environmental arguments
– Specific national needs and benefits
• Step 2 – Regional awareness – specific regional needs – What needs to happen across each region
– Co-operation/partnerships between regional authorities
• Step 3 – Effective community engagement – Demonstrate how delivery will benefit the whole community
– Specific communications programme for those who live closest
STEP 1 –
NATIONAL DEBATE
• National campaign: – Need steady stream of positive messages about total waste solution,
including benefits of EfW in terms of national energy security
– No vested interest, simply sorting out a problem with win-win outcomes
• Desired outcome – Climate change is happening
– Increased awareness and understanding of climate change will result in a deep-rooted change in behaviour – provides an opportunity – they can do something about it
– Increased understanding of the need for more energy generation
– Understanding benefits of recycling, composting and EfW use that wasted resource
STEP 2 – REGIONAL
AWARENESS
• Gain regional acceptance that change is a desired state
• Regional campaign – Need to take national debate messages and put them into context
– Identify its everyone’s problem, but solutions are at hand
• Desired outcome – Laying the ground work that shows a fundamental need for, and an
acceptance of, proposed solutions – before targeting specific sites
– Demonstration of benefits to host community
– Adult relationship with the public and their wastes
STEP 3 – EFFECTIVE
COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT
• Talk to the broader community
• Phase 1 – early dialogue
– Stakeholder dialogue – workshops, meetings etc
– Take key messages from national and regional debate
• Phase 2 – presentation of initial ideas
– Exhibitions and briefings
• Phase 3 – pre-planning applications engagement
– Exhibitions and briefings
– Demonstrate impacts of dialogue throughout
– Get third party experts and existing community hosts to enter debate
INDIRECT
COMMUNICATIONS
ROUTES
• Third party endorsement is one of the most effective
communications routes due to positive support without clear vested
interest
• Target opinion formers
• Target all relevant communications nodes.....
Nodes
Opinion
formers
CITY - A
COMMUNICATIONS
NODES AND OPINION
FORMERS
Nodes
Opinion
formers
COMMUNICATIONS
NODES AND OPINION
FORMERS
Nodes
Opinion
formers
COMMUNICATIONS
NODES AND OPINION
FORMERS
PROACTIVE
COMMUNICATIONS
MEDIA
Issues
Stunts
Protesters
STORY AUDIENCE
Issues
Information
Campaigns
Positive
Letters
Resistance to message
Informed
filtering
Waste
company Third Party
Advocates
Low profile
operator Full go ahead
and
commissioning
Regional and
national positioning
Full friends and
foes analysis,
communications
strategy and plan,
key arguments
Q&As,
key messages,
support tools
(website, literature
exhibition/
roadshow)
Get act
together
Brief key
opinion
formers,
and media Brief
community
Run
campaign
on two levels
Isolate local
antis as
understandable
NIMBYs with clear
vested interest
Proactively push
proposals as
part of solution
to waste problems
with energy
generation
Regional campaign
to demonstrate positives and
robustly debunk myths
Proactive
Council,
MPs,
business
leaders,
media
Roadshows,
communications
nodes and
ongoing
briefings
activate TPA
DELIVERING EFFECTIVE
COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT
THE FUTURE
• Change in attitudes of audience
– Climate change is happening
– Increased awareness and understanding of climate change will result in a deep-rooted change in behaviour – provides an opportunity – they can do something about it
– Increased understanding of the need for more energy generation
– Understanding benefits of recycling, composting and EfW
• National campaign
– Need steady stream of positive general messages about total waste solution including benefits of EfW
• Desired outcome
– We are not persuading anyone, just providing information
– Grown-up relationship with the public and their wastes
CONCLUSIONS
• An international perspective would help the debate
• A national debate should take place to establish context on policy and
the potential win-win-win scenario provided by EfW
• Too much emphasis on planning with the developers vested interest
clouding hosting community’s judgement
• It’s in everyone’s interests to get it right
• We need to get on with this now!
THE FUTURE OF
EFW?
ONCE BUILT
MAINTAIN
COMMUNICATIONS
• It is vitally important that once built you maintain communications
with local stakeholders and the host community
• Open days for site visits should be an annual event
• Plants must always be kept clean
• Data on performance should be published on-line in real-time
OPEN DAY!
OPEN DAY 2
OPEN DAY 3
OPEN DAY 4
OPEN DAY 5
OPEN DAY 6
FIND OUT MORE
• Paul Davison, Managing Director
• Tel: +44 (0)1295 279626
• Email: [email protected]
• Visit: www.proteuspr.co.uk
QUESTION CLINIC
PROTEUS PUBLIC RELATIONS
GAINING PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR
NEW COMBUSTION DEVELOPMENTS
CONTENTS
• What we offer
• Combustion development experience
• Why work with Proteus
• Conclusions
WHAT WE DO
• We offer:
– Strategic communications advice
– Contentious planning development support and delivery
– Good understanding of planning and technical issues
– Experience of IPC (now National Infrastructure Planning)
development
– Good value for money
– Direct talking, proactive advice with results focused delivery
COMBUSTION
DEVELOPMENT
EXPERIENCE
• Proteus has successfully delivered communications support for
many different combustion processes including:
– Energy from Waste
– Food waste processing
– Clinical waste incineration
– Cattle waste incineration including BSE and foot and mouth wastes
– Conventional power stations
– Renewables including wind farms
– Landfill gas power plants
– Large scale biomass power stations
DELIVERING NEW
DEVELOPMENT • Work is varied but includes:
– Planning support – including public inquiries, community and
organisational behaviour change, community liaison group
development, protester management and proactive media management
– Corporate communications to enhance reputation and help grow brand
values and business
– Media training and crisis management
– Materials delivery including brochures, newsletters, websites and
exhibitions, as well as all media materials such as features, press
releases, briefing materials for key stakeholders
– Public exhibitions and facilitating community group meetings* and
dialogue
*Not public meetings
CASE STUDY – PLANNING SUPPORT
NEWLINCS DEVELOPMENT
NEWLINCS
DEVELOPMENT –
OVERVIEW
• 25 year contract to manage the disposal and recycling of MSW in
North East Lincolnshire
• Key to success was development of an Integrated Waste
Management Facility, including an EfW plant, at a COMAH site near
the Humber
• Planning permission granted but targeted by anti-campaigners
• Negative media coverage, particularly regarding health issues
• Council decided to hold a review, with possibility of revoking the
planning decision
NEWLINCS
DEVELOPMENT – HOW
PROTEUS HELPED
• Developed and implemented a proactive communications strategy
• Worked to gain support from key opinion formers
• Addressed local media in a robust but constructive manner,
resulting in more balanced reporting
• Organised and managed exhibitions and meetings so they were
effective communications exercises
• Helped to form a community liaison group which has continued to
report community views and feed back information
NEWLINCS
DEVELOPMENT – THE
OUTCOME
• Council accepted an
Officer’s report that no new
evidence had been
submitted to support
opponents’ claims
• NEWLINCS became the
first EfW plant for seven
years to gain planning
permission
NEWLINCS
DEVELOPMENT –
WHAT THE CLIENT
SAID
“The strategic communications advice provided by Proteus was invaluable. Its
understanding of the environmental issues involved, coupled with its
communication skills, played a very important role in ensuring that the true
facts about the development and the safety of the facility were more widely
known and appreciated.”
Ian Crummack, General Manager
CASE STUDY – STRATEGIC POSITIONING
PETERBOROUGH CITY COUNCIL
PETERBOROUGH EFW
PETERBOROUGH CITY
COUNCIL – OVERVIEW
• Initial requirement was for support to communicate PCC’s
decision to commission an EfW facility in the city
• Requested PR support to planning submission, plus longer term
communications around implementation
• Proteus to be part of larger project team including other external
consultants, e.g. planning, design, engineering
PETERBOROUGH CC
– HOW PROTEUS
HELPED
• Strongly recommended a different communications approach to place
the EfW facility firmly in the context of Peterborough’s ambitions to
retain its status as a top recycler and attain Environment City status
• Developed a detailed communications strategy with the key objective of
broadening the debate to encompass a ‘total sustainable solution’ to
waste management in the city
• Developed and implemented a brand – 65% PLUS – under which all
waste and recycling messages could be communicated
• Developed timetable of stakeholder briefings, planned and manned
roadshows to launch 65% PLUS to public and developed supporting
materials including brochures, website, exhibition displays, etc
PETERBOROUGH CC –
THE OUTCOME
• More than 60 stakeholder organisations were briefed and every
household in Peterborough received information about 65% PLUS
and its aims
• Planning application for the EfW facility was made in December
2008
• Permission was granted in November 2009
• To date there has been no organised protest
PETERBOROUGH CC –
WHAT THE CLIENT
SAID
“The 65% PLUS campaign has enabled Peterborough City Council to
demonstrate a clear strategic vision and proactively engage with its public,
resulting in a far better understanding of the need for change, the
technological solutions available to manage our waste in future and the
public’s role in the process.”
Richard Pearn, Waste Infrastructure Programme Manager
CASE STUDY – PRE-APPLICATION
CONSULTATION
BIOMASS POWER PLANT, DONG ENERGY
HULL BIOMASS
DONG ENERGY
BIOMASS POWER
STATION – OVERVIEW
• Proposal for a 300MW biomass burning (clean woodchip) power
station on the north bank of the Humber on the borders of Hull City
and the East Riding of Yorkshire
• Nationally significant development under Infrastructure Planning
Commission (IPC)
• Existing local sensitivity following a recent planning application for a
large Energy from Waste plant nearby
• Requirement for extensive stakeholder engagement, both as part of
the IPC approach and also to conform with DONG’s own approach
to consultation
DONG ENERGY – HOW
PROTEUS HELPED
• Development of proactive communications strategy for the full
consultation process including regional public affairs, stakeholder
engagement, community relations and media management
• Development of key arguments and key messages
• Delivery of media relations programme to promote a positive
debate in the local press
• Development and delivery of the programme including website,
literature, public exhibitions, newsletters, standard presentations
and briefing notes for different stakeholders including the media
• Development and delivery of key documents including Statement
of Community Consultation and non-technical Summary
DONG ENERGY – THE
OUTCOME
• Vast majority of the regional stakeholders were publicly in favour of
the development, including local media
• Supportive statements obtained from Associated British Ports
(landowner) and Hull City Council
• Communications recognised as best practice by IPC
• Strategic decision by DONG Energy to withdraw from development
of large-scale biomass projects internationally meant project was
terminated
• Managed a professional withdrawal from the project that also
enhanced DONG’s reputation
DONG ENERGY –
WHAT THE CLIENT
SAID
““The standard of communications support we have received from Proteus has
been excellent. Proteus’ consultation programme, combined with a
responsiveness and sensitivity when handling issues raised about the
Humber Renewables project, helped to convince the local community that
they were being listened to and taken seriously.”
Claus Nørgaard, Project Director
BUDGETS
• Direct and frank approach
• Cost-effective
• Normal day rate £750
• Budgets range from £5,000 to £200,000+
• Full timesheet reporting with absolute clarity on budget
reconciliations
PROTEUS
BACKGROUND • Established in 1996
• Based in Banbury, Oxfordshire, but working throughout UK and in
Europe
• More than 60 years combined PR experience within the team
• Specialists in environmental and issues management
• Substantial planning support experience at all stages and routes
including IPC
• Recognised by the trade media as quality writers of excellent media
copy
WHAT THE MEDIA
SAYS ABOUT
PROTEUS
“Proteus is a very professional and enthusiastic agency. Not only do they
always meet deadlines, but they are always happy to come forward with
ideas and understand the needs of journalists.”
Paul Sanderson, Editor,
Materials Recycling Week (MRW)
"Proteus is what good PR is all about. It helps that members of the Proteus
team have worked in the environmental sector and this shows with their
knowledge of the industry and ability to generate news and feature ideas
proactively. Other PR companies could learn a lot from Proteus.“
Tom Freyberg, Chief Editor,
Waste Management World
ETHOS AND
APPROACH
• Understand client sectors
• Understand journalists
• Direct-talking consultancy
• Pro-active and efficient
• Collaborative style
• Creative
WHAT WE OFFER
• Strategic communications planning, consultancy and delivery
• Pro-active media relations
• Key influencer and community relations
• Issues and crisis management
• Corporate and internal communications
• Stakeholder and political research
• Project marketing
• Media training
• Events support
• Materials production
CONCLUSIONS
• We have considerable experience and skills in waste management
projects for public and private sector clients
• We will drive communications programmes
• We are specialists in public relations and public affairs
• We are cost-effective
• We are genuine consultants
FURTHER
INFORMATION
• Call: Paul Davison on 01295 279626
• Email: [email protected]
• Visit: www.proteuspr.co.uk