View
225
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
metodología para ubicación de sistema de comepnsacion
Citation preview
7/21/2019 sensibilty analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sensibilty-analysis 1/5
Universidad De La Salle. Serrano1, Mondragon2.Impacto Dispositivos FACTS.
Abstract — In this article the impact of clearing FACTS
(STATCOM and SVC) in a power system IEEE ! nodes" whose
location is determined from steady state analysis (sensiti#ity analysis
and c$r#es V%&) to maintain a condition occ$rs safe operation
related to the system #oltage sta'ility
System analysis of ! nodes was performed on a stage of maim$m
load (*+,+M-) as a tool to s$pport the .E/0A. software $sed to
r$n power flows and the respecti#e steady state analysis of power
system
Keywords 1FACTS" Voltage sta'ility" steady state" maim$m load
I. INTRODUCTION
Te e!pansion and increased demand in e!isting po"er s#stems generate a negative impact on s#stem voltage
sta$ilit#, "ose sta$ilit# is related to te increase or decrease
o% reactive po"er &'(, so #o) m)st ens)re voltage operating
range in all nodes o% te po"er s#stem ens)ring a sa%eoperating condition relative to te limits o% ma!im)m po"er
deliver# s#stem reactive present.
To ens)re voltage sta$ilit# and sa%e operation o% te s#stem,
reactive compensation devices are implemented, s)c as
FACTS compensators "ose operation is $ased on po"er
electronics applications, spanning te voltage sta$ilit#
pro$lem one o% te pro$lemsIt is presented to determine te
optimal location o% reactive compensation devices in te
s#stem, %or "ic di%%erent anal#tical tecni*)es developed in
sta$le condition to determine te location o% compensating
s)c as+ sensitivit# anal#sis &-'( and Modal anal#sis c)rves
-'. Tis article %oc)ses on te sensitivit# anal#sis &-'( and
' c)rves on a standard I 1/ s#stem 0odes %or te
proposed ma!im)m load in te $ase case o% 2.M3 $eing
and standard o% operation voltage o% 4 156 o% rated voltage.
II. APPROACH OF PROBLEM
For te location o% te devices compensation FACTS it is
important to identi%# te critical nodes o% te s#stem %or "ic
a sensitivit# anal#sis &'( is developed, and li7e"ise it isnecessar# to determine te limits o% ma!im)m operating
compensators reagents "ere it develops ' c)rve anal#sis
on te node "ere te compensation s#stem is located, ten
te development o% te t"o anal#8es presented a$ove9
:
Sensitivity analysis V-Q
It is $ased on te st)d# o% voltage variations "it respect to
te in;ection o% reactive po"er o% te load nodes, "ic elps
to identi%# te most sensitive s#stem. *)ation &1( so"s o"to represent tese variations in voltage over cange o% reactive
po"er.
<= >? -1 @ <' &1(
<9 Cange in te increase in voltage magnit)de node.
<'9 Cange in te increase o% reactive po"er in;ection.
>? 9 ?ed)ced >aco$ian matri!.
Te elements o% te inverse >aco$ian matri! red)ced &>?-1(
represents te sensitivities '. Te components o% te
diagonal represent o"n sensi$ilities vi B 'i indicating tesensitivit# o% te node "it respect to imsel% and te o%%-
diagonal elements represent m)t)al sensitivities 7 B 'i
"ic means te sensitivit# o% te node "it te s#stem.
Te sensitivities o% te voltage controlled nodes are 8ero. For a
proper interpretation o% te sensitivit# anal#sis it is clear tat9
ositive Sensitivit#9 Indicates tat te s#stem is sta$le, a smallsensitivit# val)e indicates tat te s#stem is more sta$le,
leading to as te sta$ilit# decreases sensitivit# increases.
0egative Sensitivit#9 Indicates tat te s#stem is )nsta$le, $eca)se $e%ore te in;ection increases reactive po"er voltage
levels drop in te s#stem. It is said tat te s#stem is not
controlla$le $eca)se te control devices are designed to react
"it an increased $e per%ormed a%ter an increase in '.
C!ves V-Q
Te st)d# o% tese c)rves is $ased on voltage collapseinterpret as an indication tat tere is an inade*)ate $alance o%
reactive po"er in one or more nodes o% a s#stem. Te c)rve is
o$tained $# increasing te reagent cons)mption in eac o% te
$ars o% te s#stem or at least tose considered "ea7er )ntil tecollapse. ' c)rves o$tained ave a U, in "ic te lo"est
point represents te point o% collapse and reactive po"er
margin in tat $)s.
Te a$sol)te minim)m tat range in ever# $ar s#stem te
margin to voltage collapse. An e%%icient metod %or planning
te net"or7 is considered. In oter pala$as it said te po"er
Serrano, Leonel 1 , Mondragón, Jaime2 .
Universidad de La Salle
Bogot !.", "olombia
sleonel#$%&nisalle.ed&.co1 ,m'aime#(%&nisalle.ed&.co2
IMACT SESTMS F CM0SATI0
FACTS I0 T?A0SMISSI0 SESTMS
1
7/21/2019 sensibilty analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sensibilty-analysis 2/5
Universidad De La Salle. Serrano1, Mondragon2.Impacto Dispositivos FACTS.
margin indicates te amo)nt o% reactive po"er compensation
re*)ired to restore an operating point or o$tain a desired
voltage val)e. It is also de%ined as te minim)m val)e tat canincrease te reactive po"er cons)mption o% te load or te
decrease o% reactive po"er generation %or "ic tere is no
operating point.
oltage collapse $egins in te "ea7est $ar s#stem and ten
e!tends to oter "ea7 $ars. Te "ea7est $ar is te mostimportant in te anal#sis o% voltage collapse. Te "ea7est $ar
is one tat e!i$it one o% te %ollo"ing conditions9
G It as te igest critical point.
G It as te lo"est margin o% reactive po"er.
G Has te $iggest %ail)re o% reactive po"er.
G It as te igest percentage cange in voltage.
It can $e seen in Fig)re 1, te s#stem is sta$le "it ligter
load 1. For tis load, tere is a reserve o% reactive po"er
&'reserve( can $e )sed to maintain sta$ilit# even "en teload increases. Te s#stem is marginall# sta$le "it load 2.Te s#stem is not sta$le "it te largest load , an amo)nt o%
reactive po"er &'missing( so)ld $e in;ected into te $ar to
ca)se an intersection "it te ! a!is and prevent voltage
collapse. Tere%ore, meas)ring te amo)nt o% reactive po"er reserve &'reserve( ma# provide an indication o% te margin
$et"een sta$ilit# and insta$ilit#.
Fi" #. C!ves V-Q $%! &i$$e!ent l%a&s.
III. METHODOLO'(
To st)d# compared te SC and STATCM, te 1/ nodes
S standard I, "ic is ta7en as $ase case "ito)t
capacitors s#ncrono)s nodes , and is cosen s#stem. And
r)n po"er %lo" in order to ave a point o% comparison &$ase
case( %or losses and voltage sta$ilit# o% te s#stem to locate
FACTS s#stems in te s#stem.
nce te $ase case, "e proceed to per%orm ' sensitivit#
anal#sis to identi%# te most critical s#stem "ere te location
o% FACTS compensation s#stems re*)ired nodes.
Since te parameteri8ation o% tese FACTS s#stems depends
on te amo)nt o% ma!im)m and minim)m reactive device and
sa%e operating range o% tension "itin te s#stem set "itin 4
156 o% te voltage nominal.se an anal#sis o% ' c)rves in
0LA0 to set limits reagent in;ection device.
Finall#, as a res)lt o% te sensitivit# anal#sis te most critical
s#stems nodes is determined $# coosing te t"o most critical
to te percentage o% sensitivit#, and %or eac case o%
per%orming te anal#sis o% te c)rves ' to determine te
limits o% reactive compensation %or FACTS devices ta7ing into
acco)nt te operational limits esta$lised voltage.
I. RESULTS
Cosen %or te case st)d# o% s#stem losses, tensions on eac
node and i% presented overloaded nodes are o$served.
Fi" ). Dia"!a* Test syste* IEEE #+ Bs.
In Fig)re 2. Te $ase case diagram, consisting o% 1/ nodes,
t"o generators, t"o tree-pase trans%ormers J B 1. 7, 1
tridevanado trans%ormer loads and 15 is ill)strated
Base Case, Flo" AC "ito)t compensation.
)ABL* 1
+owers + and S*+ wit-o&t comensation.
2
7/21/2019 sensibilty analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sensibilty-analysis 3/5
Universidad De La Salle. Serrano1, Mondragon2.Impacto Dispositivos FACTS.
Symbol &antity S/" S)A)"0M
/ /er M- *2"33 *2"33 & /er MVar ,!"44 ,!"44
/ 5en M- *64"*3 *64"*3
& 5en MVar ,*4"334 ,*4"334
n la ta$la 1. Se m)estra los res)ltados al correr el %l);o AC en
0LA0, donde se m)estra la relaciKn de # ' de perdida en
el sistema, as como la # ' de generaciKn.
Fi" . V%lta"e levels . /ase 0ase.
As co)ld o$serve in Fig)re . Te $)ses %rom to 1/ present
overload in te $ase case, ie te# are $elo" te criteria %or sa%e
operation o% te s#stem voltage, "ere$# a reactive
compensation "itin te s#stem is re*)ired.
Sensitivity analysis V-Q
Te %ollo"ing sensitivit# anal#sis is presented ', "it "ic
te most critical nodes o% te s#stem is determined.
Fi" +. O1n sensi/ilities.
As so"n in Fig)re 2, te most critical nodes are 1/ and 12,
$eca)se its sare o% sensitivit#, "ic means tat tese nodes
are closer to insta$ilit# and are cosen to intervene "it
FACTS s#stems.
Fi" 2. Mtal sensitivity t% t3e n%&e #+.
Fig)re so"s te sensitivit# ratio o% te node 1/ "it oternodes in te s#stem, to $e more speci%ic reagent a contri$)tion
%rom node 1/ as an in%l)ence on s#stem nodes.
Fi" 4. Mtal sensitivity t% t3e n%&e #).
Fig)re so"s te relative sensitivit# o% te node 12 "it
te oter nodes in te s#stem to $e more speci%ic reagent a
contri$)tion %rom te node 12 as an in%l)ence on te nodes o% te s#stem.
From te a$ove, FACTS devices are located at nodes 1/ and
12 to ma7e teir anal#sis. For eac o% tese nodes ' c)rves
are o$tained, in order to determine te reactive po"er
necessar# to maintain sta$ilit# and node parameters determine
$ot te SC and STATCM.
C%*ensa0i5n N%&% #+
Fi" 6. C!ve V-Q n%&e #+.
7/21/2019 sensibilty analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sensibilty-analysis 4/5
Universidad De La Salle. Serrano1, Mondragon2.Impacto Dispositivos FACTS.
-' c)rves are )se%)l %or determining te $o)ndaries o%
reagents %or FACTS devices regarding te sa%e operating
limits o% te voltage and te parameters re*)ired $# 0LA0
to node 1/.
Ten %lo" carging compensation >an node 1/ is per%ormed
and te %ollo"ing res)lts are o$tained9
)ABL* 2
+owers S*+ + and comensation node 1.
Symbol &antity S/" S)A)"0M
/ /er M- **"77* *2"33 & /er MVar 7!"*34 ,!"44
/ 5en M- *62"+7* *64"*3
& 5en MVar 3!"!*, ,*4"334&C aporte MVar !*"672 !*"672
In Ta$le 2 te res)lts "en r)nning te %lo" AC in 0LA0,
"erein te ratio o% and ' so"n in te s#stem loss, te
and ' generation displa#s. And te s)ppl# o% reagents
necessar# %or te setting o% ma!im)m s#stem load %rom te
node 1/.
Fi" 7. C%*ensate& v%lta"e levels %n /s #+ $%! SVC an&
STATCOM.
In Fig . It can $e seen tat te o%%set %rom te node 1/ $# te
SC and STATCM, generates te same e%%ect on te s#stem
voltage pro%iles, since te anal#sis is done at stead# state.
C%*ensa0i5n N%&% #)
Fi" 8. C!ve V-Q n%&e #).
-' c)rves are )se%)l %or determining te $o)ndaries o%
reagents %or FACTS devices regarding te sa%e operating
limits o% te voltage and te parameters re*)ired $# 0LA0
to te node 12.
)ABL* # +owers S*+ + and comensation node 12.
Symbol &antity S/" S)A)"0M
/ /er M- *!"7+ *2"33 & /er MVar 74"36+ ,!"44
/ 5en M- *6+"++ *64"*3
& 5en MVar 46"6 ,*4"334&C aporte MVar *,"4!+ !*"672
In Ta$le te res)lts "en r)nning te %lo" AC in0LA0 ,
"erein te ratio o% and ' so"n in te s#stem loss, te
and ' generation displa#s. And te s)ppl# o% reagents
necessar# %or te setting o% ma!im)m s#stem load %rom te
node12.
Fi" #9. C%*ensate& v%lta"e levels %n /s #) $%! SVC an&
STATCOM.
In Fig)re 15. It can $e seen tat te o%%set %rom te node 12 $#
te SC and STATCM, generates te same e%%ect on te
s#stem voltage pro%iles, since te anal#sis is done at stead#
state.
/
7/21/2019 sensibilty analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sensibilty-analysis 5/5
Universidad De La Salle. Serrano1, Mondragon2.Impacto Dispositivos FACTS.
. CONCLUSIONS
In;ecting reagents tro)g te STATCM and SC is te
same in eac case st)died, $eca)se te# m)st $ring te node to
te rated voltage, so te di%%erence $et"een te compensation
"it eac o% tese devices is teir operation and its mode o%
operation.
From sensitivit# anal#sis ' #o) can determine te optimal placement o% devices o% compensation, since as so"n in
Ta$le 2, te active po"er loss "as red)ced $# appro!imatel#
6 o% te $ase case, in addition to sta$ilit# tension is
maintained in te operating limits o% 4 156.
N# implementing compensation at te most critical s#stem
node &node 1/( sa%e operation in voltage compared to te
lo"er percentage representing sensitivit# &node 12( is
o$tained, tis can $e seen in Fig and 15.
To ma7e compensation at critical nodes sta$ilit# is o$served
tro)go)t te s#stem, 7eeping all nodes in sa%e levels o%
voltage, eiter te SC or STATCM.
Te reagent in;ection &'c( o% te device decreases as te
percentage o% sensitivit# o% eac node ', $)t tis is re%lected
in te increased loss o% active po"er s#stem.
Te limits o% reactive po"er &'( ' c)rves o$tained
according to FACTS devices, are val)es tat can $e acieved
in real s#stems, "it re%erence O2P "ere tere is a
compensation capa$ilit# 4 255MA?.
VI. REFERENCES
O1P Song" 8" 9 :ohns" A (666) Flei'le AC
transmission systems (FACTS) /ower and Energy Series
O2P ISA crea n$e#a filial dedicada al transporte de
energ;a en Colom'ia (,7!) Ingesocios edici<n 2+" ,!",2
OP =r$gnoni" M (,776) Sistemas Flei'les >e
Transmisi<n En CA >?cimo Tercer Enc$entro @egional
I'eroamericano >e Cigr?
O/P ing" 0 %" >$" %" 9 Bho$" - % (,77)
Comparison of application of SVC and STATCOM to large
capacity transmission path of power system >ianli itong
=aoh$ 8$ ongDhi/ower System /rotection and Control"
*4(,!)" 33%443
OP 0iGie" >" 8ang" 0" 9 8iH$n" M (,77) Comparison
of high capacity SVC and STATCOM in real power grid
/aper presented at the ,77 International Conference on
Intelligent Comp$tation Technology and A$tomation"
ICICTA ,77" 66*%663
OP Idris" @ M" 9 0oh" S (,72) Modelling and
sim$lation of STATCOM 9 SVC /aper presented at the
/roceeding % ,7* IEEE St$dent Conference on @esearch
and >e#elopment" SCO@e> ,7*" 3%,
OQP Tan" 8 0 (666) Analysis of line compensation 'y
sh$nt%connected FACTS controllersJ A comparison 'etween
SVC and STATCOM IEEE /ower Engineering @e#iew"
6(4)" 23%24
OP Tran" T" Bha" " 9 0e" . (,7!) /erformance
comparison 'etween STATCOM and SVC to enhance power
system sta'ility
OJP M @odr;g$e" KL'icaci<n de FACTS para meGorarla esta'ilidad de tensi<n" ,7,
O15P : 5 = Valerino" K0a esta'ilidad de la tensi<n de los
sistemas el?ctricos de potencia $tiliDando el programaN/SAF" Ingenier;a Energ?tic" #ol *" nP ," ,7,