56
14/12/2015 1 Session 11-17 Organizing Organizing What? Assemble ongoing interdependent actions into sensible sequences that generate sensible outcomes Interdependent actions/ interlocked behaviors What is an Organization?

Session 11 20

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

OB

Citation preview

Page 1: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

1

Session 11-17

Organizing

Organizing What?

Assemble ongoing interdependent actions into sensible sequences that generate sensible outcomes

Interdependent actions/ interlocked behaviors

What is an Organization?

Page 2: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

2

Transformation Process

Input

Output

Close systems

Certainty

Open systems

Uncertainty

Environment

Rational systems Natural systems

Uncertainty

Closed SystemCertainty

Open System

Goal Achievement

Survival

Rationality

Bounded Rationality

Maximizing

Satisficing Searching DecidingLearning

Limited capacity

Page 3: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

3

Managerial Level

Institutional Level

Technology Level

Controls

MeaningLegitimacy

Higher-level support

Uncertainty

Closed SystemCertainty

Open system

Goal Achievement

Survival

Technology Environment

Page 4: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

4

Technology

The combination of skills, equipments and relevant technical knowledge needed to bring about desired transformations in materials, information or people.

Technical complexity

The extent to which a production process can be programmed so that it can be controlled and made predictable

High Technical Complexity(Automation)

Low Technical Complexity(Depends primarily on KSA of

people)

Theory of Joan Woodward

Page 5: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

5

• Production of single pieces to customerorder

• Production of technically complex units oneby one

• Fabrication of large equipment in stages• Production of pieces in small batches• Production of components in large batches

subsequently assembled diversely• Production of large batches, assembly line

type• Mass Production• Continuous Process Production• Continuous flow production of liquids,

gases and solid shapes

Low

High

Technical Complexity

Small Batch

Mass Production

Continuous Processing

J. D. Thompson

Long-linked Technology(Sequential interdependence)

Mediating Technology (Pooled Interdependence)

Intensive Technology(Reciprocal Interdependence)

Page 6: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

6

Pooled

Mutual Adjustment

Planning &

Scheduling

HighSpecialism of task

activitiesReciprocal

Sequential MediumSlack Resources/

Vertical Integration

Standardization LowIncrease number

of Customers served

Form of Interdependence

Main type of coordination

Communication Strategy to reduce uncertainty

Task Analyzability

Low

High

Task Variability

HighLow

Routine

Craft Non-Routine

Engineering

Charles Perrow

Page 7: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

7

To maximize the information available

Technology Analysis

• Technical complexity

• Routineness of work

• Standardization of inputs/outputs

• Standardization of transformation processes

• Task variability

• Task analyzability

International

The Organization

Union

Competitors

Suppliers

Distributors

Customers

Ecological

Cultural

Political

Legal

Demographic

Economic

Technological

General Environment: Specific environment andOrganization’s ability to secure resources

Specific Environment Organization’s ability to secure resources

Page 8: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

8

Environmental complexity: The strength, number, andinterconnectedness of the specific and general forces that anorganization has to manage

Wider variety of products for different groups of customers

Environmental Complexity

Uncertainty about the environment

Predicting and Controlling flow of

resources

Environmental dynamism: The degree to which forces in thespecific and general environments change over time

– Stable environment

– Unstable (dynamic) environment

Page 9: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

9

• Environmental richness/ Munificence: Amount ofresources available to support an organization’s domain

– Environments may not be munificence because:

• The organization is located in a poor country or in apoor region of a country

• There is a high level of competition, and organizationsare fighting over available resources

Complexity

Munificence

DynamismEnacted

Environment

Organizational Response

Page 10: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

10

Organizational Response Domain Defenders

Reluctant Reactors

Anxious Analyzers

Enthusiastic Prospectors

UNCERTAINTY

Content Conditions

Analytical Categories

Complexity Dynamism Munificence

Technological

Legal

Political

Economic

Demographic

Ecological

Cultural

International

Page 11: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

11

Adapting to Environmental Uncertainty

IntegrationDifferentiation

Number of Positions and Departments

Environmental Complexity

Tasks are broken down into specialized,

separate parts

Tasks are rigidly defined

There is a strict hierarchy of authority

and control, and there are many rules

Knowledge and Control of tasks are

centralized at the top of the organization

Communication is vertical

Dynamism

Employees contribute to the common

tasks of the department

Tasks are adjusted and redefined

Less hierarchy

Knowledge and control of tasks are

located anywhere in the organization

Communication is horizontal

Mechanistic Organic

Page 12: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

12

Manufacturing Sales R & D

Mechanisticstructure

Organicstructure

Manufacturing Sales R & D

Tallorganization

Flatorganization

Manufacturing Sales R & DCentralized

decision making

Decentralizeddecisionmaking

Manufacturing Sales R & D

Standardization Mutualadjustment

External Environment and Uncertainty

Number of Factors in Organization Environment

HighUncertainty

LowUncertainty

HighLowLow

High

Rate ofChange inFactors in

Environment

High-ModerateUncertainty

Low-ModerateUncertainty

Page 13: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

13

ComplexSimple

Stable

Unstable

Low Uncertainty

Mechanistic Structure: Formal, Centralized

Few Departments

No integrating Roles

Current operations orientation: low-speed response

High Uncertainty

Organic Structure, teamwork: participative, decentralized

Many Deptts differentiated, extensive boundary spanning

Many Integrating roles

Extensive Planning, forecasting; high-speed response

High-Moderate Uncertainty

Organic Structure, teamwork: participative, decentralized

Few Deptts, much boundary spanning

Few integrating roles

Planning Orientation; fast response

Low-Moderate Uncertainty

Mechanistic Structure: Formal, Centralized

Many Deptts, some boundary spanning

Few integrating roles

Some planning: moderate-speed response

Complex

Dynamic

High Uncertainty

Organic Structure(Low Centralization,

formalization, and low standardization)

Greater Differentiation and More Integration

Environment

Page 14: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

14

Strategies for Managing Resource Dependencies

Two basic types of interdependencies cause uncertainty

– Symbiotic interdependencies: Interdependencies thatexist between an organization and its suppliers anddistributors

– Competitive interdependencies: Interdependencies thatexist among organizations that compete for scarce inputsand outputs

Establish Interorganizational Linkages(Symbiotic Interdependency)

ReputationCo-

optationStrategic Alliance

Merger & Takeover

Informal Formal

Page 15: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

15

Establish Interorganizational Linkages(Competitive Interdependency)

Cartel CollusionStrategic Alliance

Merger & Takeover

Controlling the Environmental Domain

• Change the Domain

• Political Activity, Regulation (Influence Govt. Legislation and Regulation)

• Trade Associations

• Illegitimate Activities

Page 16: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

16

Environmental Hostility

Industry conditions characterized by a general lack of opportunities and resources available in the

external environment (Rosenbusch et al., 2013).

Complex

Munificence

Dynamic

Resource Dependence

High Uncertainty

Control of environmental domain

Establishment of favorable linkage

Organic Structure(Low Centralization,

formalization, and low standardization)

Greater Differentiation and More Integration

Environment

Page 17: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

17

Approaches to Measure Organizational Effectiveness

External Resource Approach

– How effectively an organization manages andcontrols its external environment

Internal System Approach

– How effectively an organization functions andoperates

Approaches to Measure Organizational Effectiveness

Page 18: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

18

Measuring Effectiveness

Goal Approach:

• When output goals can easily measured

• Ex: Business organizations (Profitability, Growth, Marketshare, ROI)

Resource Based Approach:

• When other indicators of performance is difficult to obtain.Ex: Not-for-profit organizations, Social welfare organizations

Page 19: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

19

Integrated effectiveness Model

External

Control

Flexible

InternalRational Goal Emphasis

Primary goal: productivity, efficiency, profit

Sub goals: planning, goal setting

Internal Process Emphasis

Primary goal: Stability, Equilibrium

Sub goals: Information Management, Communication

Open Systems Emphasis

Primary goal: Growth & Resource Acquisition

Sub goals: flexibility, readiness

Human Relations Emphasis

Primary goal: HR DevelopmentSub goal: cohesion, morals,

training

Page 20: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

20

The WOLCI is an organization established to promote learning, particularly about employment generation and

welfare

The WOLCIA well-known Organization in Central India

In-group and out-group dynamics

• How difficult it is to create effective communication and

decisions even with best of intentions.

• Experience of dilemmas and conflicts of power

Page 21: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

21

Appreciation for structural injustice and its effect onindividuals

• Individual efforts and goodwill can be distorted andwasted in the absence of a social system that permits theirexpression

• Our understanding of power and authority

Complex interplay between structure and the individuals

• Regardless of individual beliefs and make-up, being on the top is very different from being on the bottom

• Life generally seems good for high-power persons

• Usually hard to move towards cooperation, conciliation,and compromise.

• Protect their superior power

• High-power members tend to be more angered by lowpower member’s insult than when the position is reversed

Page 22: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

22

• Like it or not, power differences between peopledetermine their relationships.

• As long as you have the power to appraise theirperformance and to advance or retard their careers, youcannot be friends in the normal sense.

• Invoke positional power only when absolutely necessary.

• Understand the boundaries of your positional power.

• Defend your position power from encroachment byothers.

Sources of Power

Source: Mcginn, K. L., & Lingo, E. L. (2007). Power & Influence. Harvard Business School Publication

Page 23: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

23

Unique personal attributes and skills

Your relationship with others

Formal roles in your organization

Personal Power

Relational Power

Position Power

Bosses offer subordinates

• A link to the rest of the organization

• Necessary resources

• Fair rewards

Subordinates offer bosses

• Knowledge that s/he will deliver

• A source of information, especially from below

• A sounding board

Page 24: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

24

• Subordinates often have difficulty recognizing the manyways in which their bosses are dependent on them.

• They tend to be much more aware of the ways in whichthey are dependent on their bosses.

• My Workplace Dependencies

I depend on …A.B.C.D.E.

For …A.B.C.D.E.

… depends on meA. B.C.D.E.

For …A.B.C.D.E.

Power rubbing

dependencies

Power enhancing

dependencies

Page 25: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

25

Coercive

Reward

Legitimate Informational

Referent

ExpertBases

of Power

Dynamics of Power

• Change in one power base affects other power bases

• Change in one person’s power affects other’s Power

• Power accumulates and erodes over time

Page 26: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

26

Ability to endure and succeedin competitive situations

Ability to obtain other’s social support

Ability to encourage other’s cooperation by building trust and understanding

Personal Power

Charisma

Communication Skills

Track Record

Energy & Stamina

Focus

Tolerance for Conflict

Sensitivity Submerging ego Flexibility

Expertise & Self-confidence

Position Power

Formal Hierarchical Position

Controlling Strategic Resources

Control over entry

Legitimate Power

Control over values andterms of Legitimacy

Page 27: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

27

Relational Power

Direct Ties

Mutual Intimacy

Tie Strength

Frequency of Interaction

Duration

Multiplexity

Reciprocity

Tie Content

Information

Money Emotions

Social Support

Exchanged Based Trust Based

Relational Power

Networking

Density

Centrality

Coalition

Page 28: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

28

Unique personal attributes and skills

Your relationship with others

Formal roles in your organization

Personal Power

Relational Power

Position Power

Formal Hierarchical Position

Controlling Strategic Resources

Legitimate Power

Ability to encourage other’s cooperation

Ability to endure and succeed

Ability to obtain other’s social support Networking

Maintaining Ties

How to be more Influential

• Increasing your power: either positional, relational or personal

• Finding ways to project your power into areas that arestrategically important to you

• Creating deeper or more broad-based dependencies by others

Page 29: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

29

Basic Dimensions of Organization Structure

• Division of Labor

• Coordination Mechanisms

• Distribution of Decision rights

• Organizational Boundaries

• Informal Organization

• Political Alignments

• Legitimate basis of Authority

The Parkinson’s law problem

•The officials want to multiply subordinates and not rivalry

•The officials make work for one another

British Navy1914-1928: No of ships in operation decreased by 68%

No of dockyard officials responsible for maintaining the fleet increased by 40%

No of top brass responsible for managing the fleet increasedby 79%

Page 30: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

30

Divisional structure: To solve some of the control problems

– Create smaller, more manageable subunits

• Product structure

• Geographic structure

• Market structure

Product Structure

Multi Divisional Structure

Product Division Structure

Product Team Structure

Page 31: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

31

SalesEngineering Marketing Finance R & D

CEO

PTManager

PT Manager

PT Manager

Product Division

Product Division

Product Division

Product Teams

Functions

Functional specialists

Product Team Structure

Division C

Division B

Division A

VPR&D

VP Marketing

VPFinance

CEO

VPMM

Corporate Headquarter Staff

Division D

Support Functions

Corporate Managers

Divisional Managers

Functional Managers

Multi Divisional Structure

Page 32: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

32

VPFinance

CEO

VPMaterials

Management

VP R & D

VPSales &

Marketing

PDM

Product Division Structure

PDM PDM PDM

Frozen Entrees Division

Canned Soups

Division

Frozen Veg.

Division

Baked Goods

Division

Product Team

VPPurchasing

CEO

VP Engineering

ManagerProduct A

ManagerProduct D

ManagerProduct C

ManagerProduct B

VPMarketing

VP Finance

VPR & D

Matrix Structure

Page 33: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

33

Network Structure

• A cluster of different organizations whose actions arecoordinated by contracts and agreements rather than through aformal hierarchy of authority

• Very complex as companies form agreements with manysuppliers, manufacturers, and distributors

Resource Efficiency

Functional Divisional Matrix Network

Excellent Poor Moderate Good

Adaptability

Responsiveness

Time Efficiency

Suited Environment

Accountability

Poor Good Moderate Excellent

Poor Moderate Good Excellent

Poor Good Moderate Excellent

Good Excellent Poor Moderate

StableHeterogen

eousComplex Volatile

Relative Advantage and Disadvantage of Different Structures

Page 34: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

34

Functional

Division of Labor

By Inputs

Coordination Hierarchy, Supervision,

plans

Decision Rights Highly Centralized

Boundaries Core/Periphery

Importance of Informal Structure

Low

Network

By Knowledge

CFT

Highly decentralized

Porous and Changing

High

Matrix

By Both

Dual Reporting Relationships

Shared

Multiple interfaces

Considerable

Divisional

By Outputs

Division manager and

Corporate staff

Separation of Strategy and

execution

Internal/External Markets

Modest

Comparison among Different Structures

• Product Structure

• Customer Structure

• Geographic Structure

• Divisional Structure

• Matrix Structure

• Amorphous Structure

• Hybrid Structure

Page 35: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

35

Key Forces in Organizational Development

• Age of the Organization

• Size of the Organization

• Stages of Evolution

• Stages of Revolution

• Growth rate of the Industry

Page 36: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

36

Age

Siz

e of

Org

aniz

atio

n

The set of shared values and norms that have been internalized (to a greater or lesser extent) by the

organization’s members

Page 37: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

37

Artifacts

Observed behaviors, structures, systems, procedures, rules …

Non-confrontableand non-debatable

Norms

Guides how members should behave

What is important in the organizations and what deserves their attention

Components of Organizational Culture

Values

Basic Assumptions

Observed behaviors, structures, systems, procedures, rules …

• Members agree about what is important for theirorganization but they do not care and unwilling to goextra mile.

• Vacuous culture

Page 38: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

38

Energize PeopleShaping and coordinating

employee behavior

Why Google is Doing what it is doing?

Well-formulated and hard to imitate strategy

Strategy may be merely reasonable but were

executed fully could be the most successful

Culture is all about Strategy

How clearly employees understand the culture and how intensely they feel about it

Strategy Culture

• An effective culture is related to business strategy

• It must be strategically relevant

• Culture is a leadership tool

Page 39: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

39

Clarity

Consistency

Comprehensiveness

ENCOURAGES

To care intensely about executing strategic objective

What does it take to execute this Strategy?

• Critical task

– Keep time down, productivity up

– Consistency

– High utilization

• People

– Energetic

– Positive

– Committed

Page 40: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

40

• Culture

– Initiative

– Fun

– Teamwork

• Formal organization

– Flat structure

– Compensation

• Leadership

What does it take to execute this Strategy?

1. Recruitment andSelection

2. Socialization, Orientationand Training

3. Reward and Leadership

Forming, strengthening and changing Culture

How does G get its competitive advantage

Page 41: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

41

Extern

al Focu

sInte

rnal

Foc

us

Flexibility and Discretion(Interest in Making Changes)

Stability and Control(Interest in Keeping things the same)

Clan Culture

(Collaborate)

Adhocracy Culture(Create)

Market Structure(Compete)

Hierarchy Culture

(Control)

A very friendlyplace to workwhere peopleshare a lot ofthemselves. It islike an extendedfamily.

Major concern is with getting the

job done. People are competitive

and goal-oriented

A dynamic entrepreneurial, and creative place to work. People stick their necks out and take risks.

“A learning organization is an organization skilled atcreating, acquiring, and transferring knowledge, and atmodifying its behavior to reflect new knowledge andinsights”

“New ideas are essential if learning is to take place”

“Without accompanying changes in the way that work getsdone, only the potential for improvements exist”

What is a Learning Organization

Page 42: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

42

Find the Leverage Point in the Equation

Organization Interaction Coefficient

Rate of Knowledge Discovery

Rate of Knowledge

Loss

Potential Knowledge Utilization

Innovation & Creativity

Openness & Sharing

Knowledge Decay

Loss of Human Capital

Project Execution

Customer Need Focus

Opportunity & Tools

Inflow of Human

Capital

( )- =

Knowledge Sharing

Knowledge Storing

Knowledge Transfer

Page 43: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

43

Learning organizations are organizations where peoplecontinually expand their capacity to create the results theytruly desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinkingare nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, andwhere people are continually learning how to learn together.

Components of Learning Organizations

Each blind man thinks he is right and the others are wrong, even though all three of them are all touching the same elephant.

Page 44: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

44

Systems thinking: a body of knowledge and tools that hasbeen developed to make full patterns clearer, and to help us seehow to change them effectively. It helps us answer thequestion -- how have we created what we currently have?

Components of Learning Organizations

Components of Learning Organizations

Page 45: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

45

Contingency Approach to Organizational Design

Design of Structure

Environment

Fit

Effectiveness

Identifying Key Activities

Allocating Activities to

Units

Organization

EnvironmentEnacted

Environment

Response

Ensuring Cross-Unit

Coordination

Ensure that Allocation and Coordination

Works

FIT

GroupingLinkingAligning

Page 46: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

46

• boundaries of subunits around activities withinthe organization

• building information flows betweeninterdependent units within the organization,and with key external organizations

• ensuring that subunits and people have theresources and motivation to carry out theactivities assigned them in linking and grouping

Grouping

Linking

Aligning

Common Grouping Options

Options:

• Function (Activity)

• Business Unit (Product or technology)

• Customer (Market, geography, or segment)

Hybrid Structures:

• Matrix

• Front end/Back end (Customer interface/R&D, Manufacturing…Support Staffs)

Page 47: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

47

Key Linking Mechanisms

• Through guidelines, procedures and policies

• Cross-unit groups: (Permanent vs. Temporary)

• Regular meetings

• Information technology systems (shared data bases)

• Planning processes (e.g. scenario building)

• Co-location (moving marketing into the same building asR&D)

• Temporary cross-unit postings of people

Key Aligning Mechanisms

• Performance evaluation

• Rewards and incentives

• Resource allocation

• Human Resource Development (recruitment, training, tracking, planning)

• Informal systems and processes—personal networks

Page 48: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

48

Galbraith’s Star Model

Performance Culture

• No External Environment

• Input/ throughput/output

• No feedback loops

• No performance variables

Page 49: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

49

Nadler and Tushman’s Model

Understanding organizational goals and

strategies as well as fitting design to various

contingencies is the first step towards

understanding organizational effectiveness

Page 50: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

50

To determine the levels of vertical and horizontal differentiation to reach organizational goals

CEO

Vertical Differentiation

Horizontal Differentiation

Improve Coordination among subunits

To facilitate specialization

Organizational Design

Challenges

How to Link and Coordinate organizational activities

Higher the differentiation the more complex the

integration mechanisms

Integration

Differentiation

Organizational Design

Challenges

Page 51: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

51

Who will make Decisions

Makes Planning and Coordination Difficult

Lose control of decision making

Risk Averse Decision making process

Slow

Centralization

Decentralization

Organizational Design

Challenges

To decide Mechanisms to control specific employee tasks and roles

Standardization

Mutual Adjustment Organizational Design

Challenges

Page 52: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

52

Broad based Communication and

Story Telling

Building a Performance Oriented Culture

Finding a Way for the Senior Management to

Role Model for the Juniors

Win back the Indian Middle

Class ConsumerEfficient Branch

Network

Rebuild Profitable

Wholesale Bank

Own Rural India

Build Global Treasury

Dominate SMEs

Business Initiatives

Enabling Initiatives

Develop Consistent Customer

Service

Integrated Risk Systems

Winning IT platform CBS++

People Initiatives

Lewin’s Model

Implementing and sustaining the change

Creating a climate for change

Engaging & enabling the organization

Page 53: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

53

Ref: Beer & Nohria (2000) Breaking the Code of Change

Theory E Theory O

Purpose Maximize Economic Value

Develop Organizational

Capabilities

Leadership Top downParticipative

Focus Structure & Systems Culture & Values

Planning Programmatic Emergent

Motivation Incentives lead (Extrinsic)

Incentives lag (Intrinsic)

Page 54: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

54

Weitzel and Jonsson’s Model of Organizational Decline

Managing Change

Page 55: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

55

Forces for Change

• Competitive Forces

• Economic Forces

• Political Forces

• Global Forces

• Demographic Forces

• Social Forces

• Ethical Forces

Resistance to Change

Individual level

Group Level

Functional Level

Organizational Level Structure, Culture, Strategy

Power and Conflict

Difference in Orientation

Norms, Cohesiveness

Habit

Selective perception and RetentionUncertainty and InsecurityCognitive biases

Page 56: Session 11 20

14/12/2015

56

Dealing with Resistance to Change… Some Strategies

Participation and Involvement

Communication

Empathy and Support

Lack of adequate information fuels gossip and adds to the anxiety

Uncertain about the consequences of Change

Management is genuinely interested in their feelings and

perceptions …

Learn how people are experiencing change

Mode of communication

Change Agents

Give members emotional support

Maintain ‘psychological distance’ from others to gainperspective needed to lead the change process

Considerable Tension and Isolation

Support

They often Must…

SurvivorsThank You