Shared Services CoSer Survey Evaluation - … · emailed a series of Eastern Suffolk BOCES Shared Services CoSer surveys for the 2014-15 school year. The surveys were arranged by

Shared Services CoSer Survey Evaluation

2014-2015 Service Year Progress Report

Prepared by:

Eastern Suffolk BOCES Office of Planning and Program Improvement

Office of Research

October 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary 1 Recommendations 3 Educational Services Results Summary 4 Management Services Results Summary 11 Supplemental Services Results Summary 15 Additional Services Results Summary 17 Reasons Districts Do Not Subscribe 19 Appendix A – Response Rates and Program Comments 20 Appendix B - CoSer Survey Ratings Results 32 Appendix C - Description of Surveys and Methodology 43 Appendix D - List of Districts Served 45 Appendix E - Shared Services CoSer Surveys 48

Shared Services CoSer Survey Evaluation – 2014-2015 Service Year Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the Spring of 2015, 196 Superintendents of Schools representing Eastern Suffolk BOCES, Western Suffolk BOCES, and Nassau BOCES component districts, as well as other regional districts were emailed a series of Eastern Suffolk BOCES Shared Services CoSer surveys for the 2014-15 school year. The surveys were arranged by Eastern Suffolk BOCES service division and contained itemized lists of services and programs that each district subscribed to within each division. Services were listed according to the order in which they appeared in the 2014-15 Eastern Suffolk BOCES Shared Services Guide. Superintendents of Schools and other district representatives selected by the superintendents were instructed to rate each of the services and programs their district subscribed to during the 2014-2015 service year, based on the experience of their staff and students. Additionally, participants were asked to provide comments concerning the quality of subscribed services, other general comments, and suggestions for new services. A total of 116 out of the 196 Superintendents of Schools (59%) returned at least one of the surveys sent electronically to their district. Approximately 69% of Eastern Suffolk BOCES component school district superintendents completed and returned their surveys. Of the four service categories, Educational and Management Services each received an increased number of “good” and “excellent” ratings compared to the 2012-13 survey results by about 1%. The breakdown of the results of all four service categories is as follows:

Educational Services

95% of the total number of ratings assigned to Educational Services was reported as “good” or “excellent.” Only 5% were rated “fair” or “poor.”

Management Services

96% of the total number of ratings assigned to Management Services was reported as “good” or “excellent.” Only 4% were rated “fair” or “poor.”

Supplemental Services

97% of the total number of ratings assigned to Supplemental Services was reported as “good” or “excellent.” Only 3% of the services were rated “fair” or “poor.”

Additional Services

97% of the total number of ratings assigned to Additional Services was reported as “good” or “excellent.” Only 3% of the services were rated “fair” or “poor.”

This was the third year that this survey was distributed online. The response rate for all participating districts was slightly less than that of the previous CoSer survey, yet still slightly higher than two of the five prior surveys. The decrease from the last survey’s responses may be due to the overwhelming obligations from the new NYSED requirements, as well as budgetary constraints.


2003-04 – 2014-15 Response Rates 2003-04 2004-05 2006-07 2008-09 2010-11 2012-13 2014-15

Overall 57% 66% 74% 74% 57% 61% 59%

Eastern Suffolk BOCES component districts

68% 76% 82% 88% 63% 71% 69%

Western Suffolk BOCES

50% 72% 83%

89%

56%

68%

53%

Nassau BOCES

50% 58% 69% 61% 51%

51%

53%

Other districts 30% 50% 65% 64% 52%

56%

58%

Approximately 1,917 ratings were provided by the participants who returned surveys. Of these ratings, 1,839 or 96% depicted “good” (3) and/or “excellent” (4) satisfaction ratings, a 1% increase compared to last survey’s of 95%. The 177 comments returned by participants expressed overall satisfaction with the services they received. These comments are reflective of what participants described as a high level of professionalism among ESBOCES staff, quality services, and ESBOCES administration’s attentiveness to districts’ concerns and needs. Please note, if a district selected the choice “Not Applicable/Not Enough Information”, this was indicated on the worksheet with an “N”. If a district “skipped” rating one of their services, it was indicated on the worksheet with an “S”. OVERALL COMMENTS

Districts from all four regions submitted feedback in the comments sections. The comments suggested survey participants were very satisfied with the services their district received, and with the Eastern Suffolk BOCES employees providing the service. All comments are recorded in Appendix A of the full report.

Twelve requests and suggestions for services that some districts perceive as not currently being offered by Eastern Suffolk BOCES were recorded. These include:

Internships and work experiences for Special education students in local communities. Ophthalmological Evaluations Educational program CoSer for computer software that districts use i.e. IXL, AIMSweb etc. Mobile Device Management Solutions Everyone will be looking for meaningful, well informed APPR training over the next months. Parent workshops Best instructional practices for special education teachers on CCLS Additional contact with HR Department We need you to take the lead in offering more training for business officials in the area of grant

management and report preparation/submission. You should consider obtaining additional bids for goods and services most school districts need and require and this could be done by sending out a separate survey for us to complete. This would greatly serve especially the smaller districts that have fewer resources and staff to perform such detailed tasks

Purchasing of mostly needed goods and services that school districts require, especially smaller districts with fewer staff and resources. Perhaps send out a separate survey for business officials


to complete that identifies those needs. Provide standard RFP's for business officials to either use or model their own after for usual needed services such as legal, auditing, accounting, architect, engineer, etc. so that the template is basically there and a new one does not need to be created from scratch or a law firm every mandatory time-frame.

Provide more RFP's for services needed by school districts as a template or to be actually used. Provide more bid contracts with vendors for goods and services needed by school districts and send out a separate survey to business officials to obtain a full list of what is needed. Provide a separate phone number for business officials to call to obtain what they need or be sent to the correct department and then explain to that department what is needed. Provide annual training in specific areas of responsibility including grant filing and reporting, ST-3 preparation and reporting, budgetary issues including all required reporting.

Separate Textbook co-ordination from book purchase so that our District can claim the private/Parochial texts under eligible costs for Textbook aid. Add the safety risk feasibility profile review to the base service.

Open the Budget Portal to Non-Component Districts to sign up for annual BOCES participation (in February)...the detail unit costs and base service fees are important to have in a timely fashion. In ERIE-1 there where CSR's that came to the district to go over all CoSers that a District buys into. They also brought CO administration team information about new offerings. (December-February) Thank You!

RECOMMENDATIONS The majority of Eastern Suffolk BOCES CoSer services provided in the 2014-15 school year were given “excellent” (4) or “good” (3) approval ratings. As the agency continues to provide these valuable services that meet the high standards the school districts have come to expect, it will also be important for the agency staff to follow up on the questions or concerns regarding the services provided to respondents’ districts. It is recommended that the agency continues to:

Maintain and build upon the relationships between the agency and district staff.

Communicate internally and externally, through various mediums, the services we offer.

Maintain the numerous networks and meetings with district staffs (Chief Operating Officers, Superintendents, Assistant Superintendents, School Business Officials, Curriculum Council, Personnel Administrators, etc.)

Feature and highlight successful services on the agency website, in Dialogue, Highlights, and the social and mass media.


EDUCATIONAL SERVICES The Educational Services Division offered over 179 services to districts in the four regions surveyed for the 2014-15 service year. As with the previous survey, each related service that coincided with a Special Education service was surveyed separately. Also, many services that fall under the Regional Information Center (RIC) that were included in the Management Services survey prior to the 2012-13 survey, are now included in the Educational Services survey. Each service that an individual district subscribed to through the Educational Services division appeared as an item on their Educational Services Survey. The overall average rating for all services delivered by this division as expressed by each region surveyed is as follows:

Eastern Suffolk BOCES component districts’ overall satisfaction rating was 3.4.

Western Suffolk BOCES component districts’ overall satisfaction rating was 3.6.

Nassau BOCES component districts’ overall satisfaction rating was 3.2.

Other BOCES component districts’ overall satisfaction rating was 3.6.

2012-13 v. 2014-15

Comparison of Educational Services Division Survey Data: Items Rated Most and Least Favorably by Eastern Suffolk BOCES Districts

Items Rated Most Favorably in 2012-13 (The numbers in parenthesis, next to each service title, identify the

CoSer number assigned to each service.)

2012-13 Average

2014-15 Average

Comprehensive Curriculum Development (531.350)

Staff Development – Public Relations (531.440)

Deaf/Hearing Impaired (317.100)

School Bank – Inclusive Service (514.470)

Student Assistance Service (SAS) (525.110)

8-1-1 Autism Behavioral Consultation & Trainings

(205.290)

Psychiatric Consultant (515.800)

Special Career Education 8-1-1 (103.120)

Visiting Experts – Enrichment Program – Reg. Quiz

Bowl (435.130)

Arts-In-Education/Visiting Experts (440.100)

Clear Track (601.020)

LAN/WAN Equip./Hardware Maintenance (601.360)

4.0

4.0

3.8

3.8

3.8

3.7

3.7

3.7

3.7

3.7

3.7

3.7

3.5

3.8

N/R

4.0

3.6

3.4

3.7

2.9

3.6

3.5

N/R

N/R


Items Rated Least Favorably in 2012-13

2012-13 Average

2014-15 Average

Facilities Management Systems (601.475)

6-1-1 Counseling (Individual/Group (203.205/210)

8-1-1 Hearing Impaired (Individual) (205.225)

8-1-1 Individual Aide (205.275)

Assistive Technology (519.400)

Election Management Systems (601.410)

Email Archiving (601.435)

SAN – Offsite Data Storage (601.465)

ScholarChip (601.470)

Infinite Campus (601.610)

School Bank – Full Service K-12 (514.430)

2.7

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.3

3.1

N/R

3.2

2.5

3.6

3.8

3.5

N/R

3.3

3.4

*Services that were rated by two districts or less were not included in this table analysis. N/R= No ratings provided by districts

2014-15 Educational Services Division Survey Data:

Items Rated Most and Least Favorably by Eastern Suffolk BOCES Districts (The numbers in parenthesis, next to each service title, identify the CoSer number assigned to each service.)

Items Rated Most Favorably 2014-15 Average

Exploratory Enrichment (405.100)

Document Repository & Fax Direct (601.070)

Northwest Evaluation Assoc. (601.860)

School Bank - Inclusive Service (514.470)

Staff Development - Public Relations (531.440)

RTIm Direct (601.030)

Email Archiving

NYS Data Validation (Certify)

Psychiatric Consultant (515.800)

Augmentative Communication (519.200)

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

3.8

3.8

3.8

3.8

3.7

3.7


Items Rated Least Favorably 2014-15 Average

12-1-1 Parent Training

Hospital Bound – Non-Classified Students (438.120)

Assistive Technology (519.400)

6-1-1 Autism/Behavioral - Parent Training (203.297)


12-1-4 Speech/Language (Individual) (204.255)

12-1-4 Vision/Impaired Mobility (Individual) (204.265)

8-1-1 A/B - Home App. Behavior Analysis (205.295)

8-1-1 Autism/Behavioral - Parent Training (205.297)

Psychological Services (312.100)

AIMSweb (601.810)

Cafeteria Systems POS (601.415)

2.3

2.5

2.5

2.7

2.9

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

* Services that were rated by two districts or less were not included in this table analysis.

Educational Services Comments

Many districts articulated the Educational Services Division’s programs and services have a positive impact on their students and staff (See Appendix A).

Most of the concerns participants expressed, however, related to their students and staffs’ experience with various special education programs offered through the Educational Services division. Participants were primarily concerned about the need for more support, more qualified personnel, communication with the “home district”, and the cost of the programs (See Appendix A). The comparison graphs on the following pages detail the average rating for each item as assigned by ESBOCES component districts during the 2003-04, 2004-05, 2006-07, 2008-09, 2010-11, 2012-13, and 2014-15 service years have been divided into four graphs (parts 1-4) for readability purposes. Breaks between service points indicate that districts did not subscribe to a particular service charted on the graph, districts did not rate such services, or the service did not exist that year.

Sh

are

d S

erv

ices C

oS

er S

urv

ey E

valu

atio

n –

20

14

-20

15

Se

rvic

e Y

ea

r

Pa

ge

7

Rating Key: 4=Excellent, 3=Good, 2=Fair, 1=Poor

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

4.0

Educational Services Division 2003-04 v. 2004-05 v. 2006-07 v. 2008-09 v. 2010-11 v. 2012-13 v. 2014-15

Average Rating by Service (Part 2) (as assigned by ESBOCES component school districts)

2003-04 Average Rating 2004-05 Average Rating 2006-07 Average Rating 2008-09 Average Rating

2010-11 Average Rating 2012-13 Average Rating 2014-15 Average Rating


Sh

are

d S

erv

ices C

oS

er S

urv

ey E

valu

atio

n –

20

14

-20

15

Se

rvic

e Y

ea

r

Pa

ge

8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

4.0





Sh

are

d S

erv

ices C

oS

er S

urv

ey E

valu

atio

n –

20

14

-20

15

Se

rvic

e Y

ea

r P

ag

e 9


2

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

4





Sh

are

d S

erv

ices C

oS

er S

urv

ey E

valu

atio

n –

20

14

-20

15

Se

rvic

e Y

ea

r

Pa

ge

10



MANAGEMENT SERVICES Forty-six services from the Management Services Division were included as items in the Management Services Division’s survey. Respondents from all of the four regions surveyed subscribe to these services and a total of 53 districts rated them (31 from Eastern Suffolk BOCES; 8 from Western Suffolk BOCES districts; 5 from Nassau BOCES districts and 9 from other districts). Each service that an individual district subscribed to through the Management Services division appeared as an item on their Management Services Survey. The overall average rating for all services delivered by this division as expressed by each region surveyed is as follows:

Eastern Suffolk BOCES component districts’ overall satisfaction rating was 3.3.

Western Suffolk BOCES component districts’ overall satisfaction rating was 3.0.

Nassau BOCES component districts’ overall satisfaction rating was 3.8.

Other BOCES component districts’ overall satisfaction rating was 3.8.

2012-13 v. 2014-15 Comparison of Management Services Division Survey Data:


* Services that were rated by two districts or less were not included in this table analysis. N/A = Service no longer offered or no district rated it

Items Rated Most Favorably in 2012-13 2012-13 Average 2014-15 Average

Transportation - Special Career & Technical Ed.

(604.110)

Transportation - Career & Technical Ed. (601.120)

District Shared Health & Safety Specialist

(618.150)

DMV 19A Bus Drivers Certified Examiner Course

(624.140)

District Printing (505.100)

Non-Public School Transportation (607.120)

Staff Development: Bus Drivers Drug/Alcohol

Testing/Physicals (624.110)

Workers Compensation Consortium Coordinator

(633.130)

Transportation - ESBOCES Special Ed (603.110)

Public Relations - Media & Communications

(609.300)

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

3.8

3.8

3.8

3.8

3.7

3.7

N/R

3.3

3.4

N/R

3.8

2.7

3.7

3.5

3.1

3.7

Items Rated Least Favorably in 2012-13 2012-13 Average 2014-15 Average

Health & Safety Weather Service (618.140)

School Bus Safety Program/Safety Sally

(417.100)

Transportation Service - Coach & Field Trips

(604.130)

Health & Safety Basic Service (618.120)

2.5

3.3

3.3

3.3

N/R

3.1

2.8

3.4


2014-15 Management Services Division Survey Data:


Services that were rated by two districts or less were not included in this table analysis.

Management Services Comments Much like the 2012-13 survey results for the Management Services Division, the most commonly selected quality indicator for services offered by the Management Services Division during the 2014-15 service year was either “good” or “excellent" as suggested by many comments (See Appendix A).

The comparison graphs on the following pages detail the average rating for each item as assigned by ESBOCES component districts during the 2003-04, 2004-05, 2006-07, 2008-09, 2010-11, 2012-13, and 2014-15 service years have been divided into two graphs (parts 1 and 2) for readability purposes. Breaks between service points indicate that districts did not subscribe to a particular service charted on the graph, districts did not rate such services, or the service did not exist that year.

Items Rated Most Favorably 2014-15 Average

Global Compliance (618.210)

District Printing/Duplication. (505.100)

Health Insurance Coordination Service - (East End) (633.110)

Employee Assistance Program (EAP) (617.100)

Bus Drivers Drug/Alcohol Testing/Physicals (624.110)

Media/Community PR Consulting Services (609.300)

Nonpublic School Textbook Distribution Program (623.110)

Cooperative Bidding (612.110)

4.0

3.8

3.8

3.8

3.7

3.7

3.6

3.6

Items Rated Least Favorably 2014-15 Average

Negotiations Information Services (602.110)


Transportation Service - Coach & Field Trips (604.130)

ESBOCES Mobile Safety Bus (417.100)

ESBOCES Special Ed. Transportation (603.110)

Transportation - Career & Technical Ed. (604.120)

NYSED Bus Driver/Monitor Physical Performance Test (624.230)

Health & Safety Consultant (618.110)

2.5

2.7

2.8

3.1

3.1

3.3

3.3

3.3

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Management Services 2003-04 v. 2004-05 v. 2006-07 v. 2008-09 v. 2010-11 v. 2012-13 v. 2014-15

Average Rating by Service (Part 1) (as assigned by ESBOCES component school district survey participants)



Sh

are

d S

erv

ices C

oS

er S

urv

ey E

valu

atio

n –

20

14

-20

15

Se

rvic

e Y

ea

r

Pa

ge

13


2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Management Services 2003-04 v. 2004-05 v. 2006-07 v. 2008-09 v. 2010-11 v. 2012-13 v. 2014-15

Average Rating by Service (Part 2) (as assigned by ESBOCES component school district survey participants)



Sh

are

d S

erv

ices C

oS

er S

urv

ey E

valu

atio

n –

20

14

-20

15

Se

rvic

e Y

ea

r P

ag

e 1

4


SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES

Sixty services were included as items for the Supplemental Services Survey. These are services that are not offered through Eastern Suffolk BOCES, but are cross-contracted by some of our component districts through other BOCES. This is the fourth time that our component districts who subscribe to these services were asked by us to evaluate the services that they actually subscribe to. Forty-seven of the fifty-one component districts subscribed to at least one of these Supplemental services. Twenty-seven districts chose to rate these services, while 5 districts provided comments on these services.

The overall average response rate was 3.5. Supplemental Services Comments

Most participants who responded were satisfied and/or impressed with the services they subscribed to under the Supplemental Services during the 2014-15 service year. A few districts submitted comments, mentioning a service was very expensive, some kits were lacking, and technology is dated and cumbersome (See Appendix A). The comparison graph on the following page details the average rating for each item as assigned by ESBOCES component districts during the 2008-09, 2010-11, 2012-13, and 2014-15 service years. The 2008-09 survey was the first time these cross-contracted services were rated. Breaks between service points indicate that districts did not subscribe to a particular service charted on the graph, districts did not rate such services, or the service did not exist that year.

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Supplemental Services 2008-09 v. 2010-11 v. 2012-13 v. 2014-15

Average Rating by Service (as assigned by ESBOCES component school district survey participants)


Sh

are

d S

erv

ices C

oS

er S

urv

ey E

valu

atio

n –

20

14

-20

15

Se

rvic

e Y

ea

r P

ag

e 1

6



ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional Services for the purpose of this survey evaluation included all services that are offered to districts as free or included in the cost of other CoSers. This section of the survey only pertained to the 51 Eastern Suffolk BOCES districts. Thirty-two of the fifty-one component school districts rated their services in this section.

The overall average response rate was 3.5. Additional Services Comments

Additional Services comments include comments that refer to specific administrative offices, grant/specially funded programs, and other special services offered throughout the agency (See Appendix A). The comparison graph on the following page details the average rating for each item as assigned by ESBOCES component districts during the 2003-04, 2004-05, 2006-07, 2008-09, 2010-11, 2012-13, and 2014-15. Breaks between service points indicate that districts did not rate such services, or the service did not exist that year.

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Additional Services 2003-04 v. 2004-05 v. 2006-07 v. 2008-09 v. 2010-11 v. 2012-13 v. 2014-15

Average Rating by Service (as assigned by ESBOCES component school district survey participants)




Sh

are

d S

erv

ices C

oS

er S

urv

ey E

valu

atio

n –

20

14

-20

15

Se

rvic

e Y

ea

r

Pa

ge

18


Reasons districts do not subscribe to some Eastern Suffolk BOCES services Many districts that do not subscribe to particular services stated various rationales for not subscribing. Respondents cited various reasons for not subscribing to particular services. Examples of some of these categories are described as follows: Cost is a problem – As was the case in each of the six previous CoSer surveys, the 2014-15 CoSer survey comments regarding the cost of services, was a real concern. Some participants stated that the high cost associated with some services prohibit or deter districts from subscribing to such services.

Districts Questioning Subscription Status - 12 of the 196 districts were unaware of, or

questioned their subscription status for certain services they originally signed up for. Of those participants that questioned their subscription status, four participants noted that their district provides select services in-house. There were four additional districts that stated they subscribe to a particular service through their local BOCES, instead of through ESBOCES.



Appendix A


RESPONSE RATES

This was the third year that this survey was distributed online. The response rate for all participating districts was similar to the previous two CoSer surveys, yet still lower than the three surveys prior to that. Although districts have become more familiar with the online survey format, the lower response rate as compared with the 2004-2005 thru 2008-09 three surveys may still be due to overwhelming obligations from the new NYSED requirements, as well as budgetary constraints.

2003-2004 – 2014-2015 Response Rates 2003-

2004 2004-2005

2006-2007

2008-2009

2010-2011

2012-2013

2014-2015

Overall 57% 66% 74% 74% 57% 61% 59%

Eastern Suffolk BOCES component districts

68% 76% 82% 88% 63% 71% 69%

Western Suffolk BOCES

50% 72% 83%

89%

56%

68%

53%

Nassau BOCES 50% 58% 69% 61% 51%

51%

53%

Other districts 30% 50% 65% 64% 52%

56%

58%

Approximately 177 program and service delivery-related comments were provided on the 196 surveys completed by district survey participants. Every comment submitted by districts in each of the regions served by ESBOCES is recorded in this section of the report. Comments are arranged by service division and then by CoSer in alphabetical order. Most comments are from ESBOCES participants, unless otherwise noted. Comments deriving from respondents representing school districts in other BOCES are preceded by their BOCES acronym.

Educational Services Survey Comments

6-1-1 Special Class (203.100) “CAC work well with our most difficult students. However, when students are removed

from the program there are no other program options available for ED student.” 6-1-1 Counseling (Individual) (203.205) and (Group) (203.210)

“When students enter BOCES programs during the course of the school year, the initiation of services may be delayed. The quality of the counseling services varies widely. Documentation of sessions and topics addressed is needed.”

6-1-1 Hospital Bound Classified (203.120)

“Not applicable.” 6-1-1 Individual Aide (203.275)

“At times the only option to maintain placement, typically for elopement/aggression issues.”


6-1-1 Autism/Behavior – Home App. Behavior Analysis (203.295) “At times the only option to maintain placement, typically for elopement/aggression

issues.” “Our understanding is that the service is often provided by a TA or not-fully qualified

personnel.” 6-1-1 Autism/Behavior – Parent Training (203.297)

“Our understanding is that the service is often provided by a TA or not-fully qualified personnel”

• “At times the only option to maintain placement, typically for elopement/aggression issues.”

6-1-1 Autism/Behavior – Home App. Behavior Analysis (203.295)

• “Our understanding is that the service is often provided by a TA or not-fully qualified personnel.”

6-1-1 Autism/Behavior – Parent Training (203.297)


8-1-1 Special Class (205.100)

• “Better communication when students can no longer be placed at IAC.” • “Poor follow through at WHBLC. Children are not getting the supports needed.”

8-1-1 Counseling (Individual) (205.205) and (Group) (205.210)

• “When students enter BOCES programs during the course of the school year, the initiation of services may be delayed. The quality of the counseling services varies widely. Documentation of sessions and topics addressed is needed.”

• “At times the only option to maintain placement, typically for elopement/aggression issues.”

6-1-1 Autism/Behavior – Home App. Behavior Analysis (203.295)


6-1-1 Autism/Behavior – Parent Training (203.297)


8-1-1 Special Class (205.100)

• “Better communication when students can no longer be placed at IAC.” • “Poor follow through at WHBLC. Children are not getting the supports needed.”

8-1-1 Counseling (Individual) (205.205) and (Group) (205.210) • “When students enter BOCES programs during the course of the school year, the

initiation of services may be delayed. The quality of the counseling services varies widely. Documentation of sessions and topics addressed is needed.”

8-1-1 Individual Aide (205.275)

“Very expensive.”


8-1-1 Speech/Language Impaired (Individual) (205.255) “Not many students participate in the service at this age.” “Recommendations at CSE typically do not include a change of services to group

speech. Also, students are recommended for services who would not qualify at a district level for speech services.”

“Poor follow through at WHBLC. Children are not getting the supports needed.” 8-1-1 Speech/Language Impaired (Group) (205.260)

“Poor follow through at WHBLC. Children are not getting the supports needed.”

8-1-1 Autism/Behavior – Home App. Behavior Analysis (205.295) “Our understanding is that the service is often provided by a TA or not-fully qualified

personnel.” 8-1-1 Speech/Language Impaired (Individual) (205.255)

“Not many students participate in the service at this age.” “Recommendations at CSE typically do not include a change of services to group

speech. Also, students are recommended for services who would not qualify at a district level for speech services.”

“Poor follow through at WHBLC. Children are not getting the supports needed.” 8-1-1 Speech/Language Impaired (Group) (205.260)

“Poor follow through at WHBLC. Children are not getting the supports needed.”

8-1-1 Autism/Behavior – Home App. Behavior Analysis (205.295) “Our understanding is that the service is often provided by a TA or not-fully qualified

personnel.” 8-1-1 Autism/Behavior – Parent Training (205.297)

“No notification if parent is not participating.” “Our understanding is that the service is often provided by a TA or not-fully qualified

personnel.” 12-1-1 Special Class (202.100)

“In-district 12:1:1 classes.”

“Special Career has been a wonderful opportunity for our students.”

“The Islip School District runs its own 12:1:1 program.” 12-1-1 Counseling (Individual) (202.205)

“The Islip School District runs its own 12:1:1 program.” 12-1-1 ESL (Individual) (202.215)

“The Islip School District runs its own 12:1:1 program.” 12-1-1 Individual Aide (202.275)

“The Islip School District runs its own 12:1:1 program.” 12-1-4 Special Class (204.100)

“No follow up with family when child was out over 80 days this year and last year.”

“WHB & Premm very good with medically involved & students with multiple disabilities.”


AIMSweb (601.810)

“The 2.0 version has been problematic. Although our district has been trying to be patient, we receive answers from the company that do not make sense in how to use data. For example, if we are running a report based on comparing the buildings to each other using national norms, they actual graphs and charts should not reflect building norms. This has been an extremely frustrating experience and has impacted our ability to make informed decisions regarding curriculum and instructional practices.”

BARS on the Web (601.960)

“Reports are not available in a timely fashion for teachers to drive their instruction.”

“Staff development on use of BARS arranged this year was lacking - need to have someone come who can really show staff what it can do for them. Underutilized at best.”

Career & Technical Education (101.100)

“We receive positive feedback for this general ed program. We need more timely follow through on attendance issues.”

“Only concerns are when Report Card windows do not line up and we receive grades after our report cards go out. Would like to include on District Report Cards. This information should be gathered to see if changes can be made at the CTE sites.”

Career & Technical Education Transportation (101.100)

“We utilize district transportation.” Curriculum Workshops (531.315)

“Many workshops were cancelled due to low enrollment.” “The Technology and Brainhoney sessions were informative and relevant to the District's

initiatives.” Customized Staff Development (531.300)

“The consultants have worked well with meeting the needs of our District.” EDGE Annual License (601.430)

“Very reliable and stable software.”

Educational Leadership, Development & Placement Service (531.400)

“No need to use this service this year.” Election Management Systems (601.440)

“Program works well with our district. We use a ballot printing company, through Putnam County, Phoenix Graphics. I would be helpful if they were BOCES aidable as this represents one of the higher costs of the elections with the scanning machines.”

“The service meets all the district's needs. We find the service extremely worthwhile.” Emergency Notification Systems (601.440)

“Connect Ed continues to serve us well.” “Not Applicable - Cost Prohibitive.”


e-Rate Intellipath (601.110)

“The services meet our needs but greater detail and communication would be appreciated. With regard to 3-rate, we simply receive a check without any documentation as to how the amount is determined. It would also be helpful to get an estimate of what to expect at the beginning of the year so we can compare it to what we actually receive at the end of the year.”

“We did not subscribe.” “We utilize Nassau BOCES services.”

eSchool Data (601.710)

“Superb staff” Facilities Management Systems (601.475)

“No need to use this service.” Finance Manager (601.455)

“Support at BOCES is excellent.” IEP Direct (601.040)

“District utilizes Centris Group help desk.”

“Very helpful staff.” Infinite Campus (601.610)

“The support staff at ESBOCES does a phenomenal job assisting with any issues regarding Infinite Campus.”

“The team of individuals who support Infinite Campus do an excellent job of following up when I have an issue.”

Intellipath Line Charges (644.110)

“We did not subscribe.” Junior ROTC (422.010)

“Received an evaluation from AFJROTC that our unit earned a unit evaluation rating of Does Not Meet Standards. More over-site of program from BOCES is necessary.”

LAN/WAN Support (601.340)

“CSDNet is an excellent resource for us.” Library Services/Media (516.210)

“Fort Ann has appreciated piggy-backing off of Eastern Suffolk for database services this year. You provided a range of databases that were difficult for us to afford on our own. Thank you.”

Medicaid Module (601.050)

“We subscribe but have no students eligible.” Model Schools (532.100)

“This service is very weak. You need to better screen your staff developers and content of your professional development materials.”

“We had some great training this year. Very knowledgeable.”


My Learning Plan (531.200) “Great support services.” “Terrific support at a phone call away.”

Northwest Evaluation Assoc. (601.860)

“We no longer use NWEA. We moved to AIMSweb as it appeared to be less time consuming and user-friendly. While actual administration is a great time saver and the individual student information is helpful, we have not found AIMSweb to be user-friendly.”

Psychological Services (312.110)

“Re-evaluations need to be done in a timely manner.” Regional Summer School (432.110)

“BOCES needs to establish a better student management system. Have noticed a high failure rate in some subject areas. Teachers should not continue to be hired who have high failure rates.”

“Excellent service, we generally subscribe in case we need the service.”

Right Reason Technology (601.890) “Insufficient PD.”

School Bank – Full Service K-12 (514.430)

“Did not subscribe.”

Scoring for NYSED Gr 3-8 & NYSESLAT (531.510) “Always great service.” “The time frame for turnaround for dropping off the scoring is not reasonable.”


“Standards for entrance and exit criteria from this program vary, and are not communicated.”


“Standards for entrance and exit criteria from this program vary, and are not communicated.”

Staff Development - Public Relations (531.440)

“Our experience has been positive.”

“We did not subscribe.” Summer School Special Education (208.110)

“We did not subscribe.”

Test Scanning and Reporting (601.990)

“Great staff.”

“Staff is very knowledgeable and helpful.”

Miscellaneous Educational Services Comments Additional Services Requested:

“Internships and work experiences for Special education students in local communities.”


“Educational program CoSer for computer software that districts use i.e. IXL, AIMSweb etc.”

“Mobile Device Management Solutions.”

[WSB] “Ophthalmological Evaluations.”

[NB] “Everyone will be looking for meaningful, well informed APPR training over the next months.”

[NB] “Parent workshops Best instructional practices for special education teachers on CCLS.”

[NB] “n/a - we are a Nassau BOCES subscriber.” General Comments:

“I (Marjory Bernstein) would like to talk to someone about the Special Education portion of this survey.”

“Visiting artists and clinicians are professional, timely, well-trained and serve our students well.”

“I thank Gail at BOCES who is always a big help and provides us with whatever we need.”

“Little Flower finds the services very responsive and the staff knowledgeable.” “The special education division headed by Gina Reilly is a pleasure to work with. The

working relationship of her and her staff with districts is wonderful. Also Mr. Kevin Crofton at WHB BOCES is a cooperative and helpful with the students we have send there. Elizabeth Melichar has also been very helpful in meeting our district’s needs.”

[WB] “Vendor Training by Finance Manager to ESBOCES support team will further the value added by this group.”

[NB] “We did not subscribe to any ESBOCES services.” [OB] “Fort Ann has appreciated piggy-backing off of Eastern Suffolk for database

services this year. You provided a range of databases that were difficult for us to afford on our own. Thank you!”

[OB] “Syntax does a quality job regarding our public relations needs.” [OB] “We use OCM BOCES.”

Management Services Survey Comments

Cooperative Bidding (612.110)

“Long time participating district - great benefit.”

[NB] “Great Neck Public Schools currently uses Nassau BOCES for the Cooperative Bidding component of the Administrative and Business Services CoSer. Eastern Suffolk BOCES offered the Classroom Furniture and Carpentry Bid, giving our District additional options.”

[OB] “We find the Bid very helpful. Good communications.”

[OB] “We use only the bid for copiers.”

DMV 19A Certified Examiner Course (624.140)

[NB] “Not needed at this time.” Employee Assistance Program (EAP) (617.100)

“Excellent service for our employees and their families.” ESBOCES Special Ed. Transportation (603.110)

“Service has been inconsistent in past. Frequent late pickups.”


Health & Safety Consultant (618.110)

[NB] “We utilize district security director and employ our own security staff.” Media/Community PR Consulting Services (609.300)

[NB] “We did not subscribe.” Negotiations Information Services (602.110)

“Not too much contact with service - only regular contact is email on CPI - of limited value.”

“There is limited input from other schools as well as the inability to create "reports" similar to what was given to us prior to the new Form Hog system.”

Non-Public School Textbook Distribution Program (623.110)

“Would be beneficial to have a site closer than Westhampton Beach. Long travel for families.”

“There must be an easier method to coordinate non-public school textbook ordering. Is it possible to obtain an end of the year distribution report from ESBOCES as to each student that received one set or two sets (as applicable) and the school/location?”

[WSB] “Separate Textbook co-ordination from book purchase so that our District can claim the private/Parochial texts under eligible costs for Textbook aid. Add the safety risk feasibility profile review to the base service.”


“Service has been inconsistent in past. Frequent late pickups.” Substitute Service – Basic Level (628.100)

“Great customer service.”

“Joette does a great job. I am not always pleased by the people who substitute for her. Essentially it is not due to incompetence, it is just that they do not know our staff and substitutes.”

Transportation – Coach & Field Trips (604.130)

“Service has been inconsistent in past. Frequent late pickups.”

Workers Comp. Consortium Coordinator (633.130)

“Better communication is needed related to current year estimates and future budgetary assumptions.”

Miscellaneous Management Services Comments:

Additional Services Requested:

“Additional contact with HR Dept.”

“We need you to take the lead in offering more training for business officials in the area of grant management and report preparation/submission. You should consider obtaining additional bids for goods and services most school districts need and require and this could be done by sending out a separate survey for us to complete. This would greatly serve especially the smaller districts that have fewer resources and staff to perform such detailed tasks.”

[WSB] “Separate Textbook co-ordination from book purchase so that our District can claim the private/Parochial texts under eligible costs for Textbook aid. Add the safety risk feasibility profile review to the base service.”


[WSB] “Open the Budget Portal to Non-Component Districts to sign up for annual BOCES participation (in February)...the detail unit costs and base service fees are important to have in a timely fashion. In ERIE-1 there where CSR's that came to the district to go over all CoSers that a District buys into. They also brought CO admin team information about new offerings. (December-February) Please email me this survey directly in the future as I did not see the original request. Thank You!”

General Comments:

“BOCES has always been most receptive to questions and concerns.”

“WE ARE SATISFIED.”

“Reach out to new district level personnel for welcome/orientation.”

“Annual Shared service requests should initiate contracts with other BOCES.” “There should be ongoing refresher training for new and existing business officials in

the area of tax cap preparation and reporting, preparation of the property tax notice, school budget notice, budget statement, budget calendar preparation, and 1% tax freeze. There should also be an annual business official's meeting to discuss and explain the ST-3 process, changes and reporting, TAN borrowing, capital projects reporting and final cost reports.”

[NB] “We did not subscribe to Media/Community Public Relations Consulting.” [NB] “Great Neck's Director of Facilities said he was very satisfied with your bids and

found them to be, "Excellent across the board with no problems with the goods or services, however a long process in utilizing." We are hopeful that the cross contracting process improve between all BOCES.

[NB] “All services have been beneficial to the Levittown School District.”

Supplemental Services Survey Comments

Curriculum Development (Putnam BOCES) (569.490)

“Very cost effective curriculum.”

Elementary Science Kits - (Monroe #2 BOCES) (570.490)

“Some of the kits are found to be exceptional whereas some are lacking.”

Long Island High School for the Arts (Nassau BOCES) (470.490)

“Very Expensive.” Online Application System for Educators (OLAS) (Putnam - N. Westchester BOCES) (690.490)

“Technology is dated and cumbersome to use. A much more powerful and useful database could easily be constructed.”

Staff Development (Western Suffolk BOCES) (550.490)

“Directors find the coordinator meetings to be beneficial and attended regularly.” State Aid Planning Service (Questar III BOCES) (665.490)

“Always helpful when we call for clarification.”


Miscellaneous Supplemental Services Comments Additional Services Requested

“Purchasing of mostly needed goods and services that school districts require, especially smaller districts with fewer staff and resources. Perhaps send out a separate survey for business officials to complete that identifies those needs. Provide standard RFP's for business officials to either use or model their own after for usual needed services such as legal, auditing, accounting, architect, engineer, etc. so that the template is basically there and a new one does not need to be created from scratch or a law firm every mandatory time-frame.”

General Comments:

“WE ARE SATISFIED.” “There should be a help line for new business officials to call and request assistance

in areas they are unfamiliar with or someone who can direct the call, explain the nature of the call to the appropriate department, so that the caller does not have to keep explaining the nature of their call over and over again until hopefully reaching the correct person.”

Additional Services Survey Comments

Support from the Office of District Superintendent

“Always responsive.”

“Always willing to help.”

“I don't usually interact with this office.” Support from the Office of Chief Operating Officer

“Always willing to help.”

“Always responsive and disseminates great material/info.”

“I don't usually interact with this office.” Support from the Office of Educational Services

“I don't usually interact with this office.” Support from the Office of Management Services

“Good luck in retirement Barbara!”

“Very excited about Ryan Ruf taking over position.”

Support from the Department of Human Resources

“Have no need to use services.”

“Thank you for the special reports created and received from Ken Marlborough.”

“Very organized person.” Support from Regional Certification Office

“Have been quite helpful when I needed them.”

“I don't normally interact with this office.”

Support from Bilingual/ESL Technical Assistance Center (BETAC)

“Best support services at BOCES. You need more personnel in this department.”


“Terri and her crew are magnificent.”


Support from the Regional Special Education - Technical Assistance Support Center (RSE-TASC)


“Michelle Levy is the best.” Support from Family Education Outreach Programs (Migrant Programs, Homeless, Even Start) (FEOP)


“Julia has done a great job of keeping us informed during the demographic transition of our school.”

Value of Curriculum Council Participation

“Have not attended.”


“It seems that attendance has dropped this year. Monthly meetings need to focus on NYSED initiatives.”

Value of Council of Administrators of Special Education (CASE) Participation

“NA - We will likely use this service in the future.”

“I don't normally interact with this office.” Value of Council of School Business Officials Participation

“I've not had the opportunity to participate in this due to the timing of when said meetings are held. I do receive the minutes of the meetings which are much appreciated.”

Value of Council of School Human Resources Administrators Participation

“I've not been involved with this.” Miscellaneous Additional Services Comments Additional Services Requested:

“Provide more RFP's for services needed by school districts as a template or to be actually used. Provide more bid contracts with vendors for goods and services needed by school districts and send out a separate survey to business officials to obtain a full list of what is needed. Provide a separate phone number for business officials to call to obtain what they need or be sent to the correct department and then explain to that department what is needed. Provide annual training in specific areas of responsibility including grant filing and reporting, ST-3 preparation and reporting, budgetary issues including all required reporting.”

General Comments: “Keep up the great work.” “AS A SPECIAL ACT SCHOOL, LITTLE FLOWER APPRECIATES THE

ASSISTANCE AND CONSIDERATION WE ARE GIVEN” “ESBOCES is and always has been a great help to the Montauk Schools.” “Thank you for the many services you do offer and provide. Your staff is always very

nice and friendly and always attempt to get me the information needed.”


Appendix B (Printable on 11 x 17 paper)


ESBOCES- EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CoSer Survey Subscriptions 2014-15 - Part 1a

2014-15 Special Education

District 12-1

-1 S

pe

cia

l C

lass

12-1

-1 C

ou

ns

eli

ng

(In

div

idu

al)

12-1

-1 C

ou

ns

eli

ng

(G

rou

p)

12-1

-1 O

ccu

pa

tio

na

l T

he

rap

y (

Ind

ivid

ua

l)

12-1

-1 O

ccu

pa

tio

na

l T

he

rap

y (

Gro

up

)

12-1

-1 S

pe

ech

/Lan

gu

ag

e (

Ind

ivid

ua

l)

12-1

-1 S

pe

ech

/Lan

gu

ag

e (

Gro

up

)

12-1

-1 I

nd

ivid

ual

Aid

e

12-1

-1 P

are

nt

Tra

inin

g

6-1

-1 S

pe

cia

l C

lass

6-1

-1 S

ton

y B

roo

k H

osp

ital P

rog

ram

6-1

-1 C

ou

ns

elin

g (

Ind

ivid

ua

l)

6-1

-1 C

ou

ns

elin

g (

Gro

up

)

6-1

-1 O

ccu

pa

tio

nal

Th

era

py

(In

div

idu

al)

6-1

-1 O

ccu

pati

on

al

Th

era

py

(G

rou

p)

6-1

-1 S

pe

ech

/Lan

gu

ag

e (

Ind

ivid

ua

l)

6-1

-1 S

pe

ech

/Lan

gu

ag

e (

Gro

up

)

6-1

-1 I

nd

ivid

ual

Aid

e

6-1

-1 A

uti

sm

/Beh

avio

ral

- P

are

nt

Tra

inin

g

12-1

-4 S

pe

cia

l C

lass

12-1

-4 O

ccu

pa

tio

na

l T

he

rap

y (

Gro

up

)

12-1

-4 P

hy

sic

al T

he

rap

y (

Gro

up

)

Coser # 202.1

00

202.2

05

202.2

10

202.2

35

202.2

40

202.2

55

202.2

60

202.2

75

202.2

97

203.1

00

203.1

20

203.2

05

203.2

10

203.2

35

203.2

40

203.2

55

203.2

60

203.2

75

203.2

97

204.1

00

204.2

40

204.2

50

Average Rating 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.5 3.2 2.3 3.4 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.5 3.1 2.7 3.4 3.4 3.4

Number of District Ratings 14 8 9 3 3 9 10 5 3 10 2 8 8 6 3 4 4 7 3 10 8 8

Bayport-Blue Point 3 3 3 N N N N N N N

Comsewogue 3 3 3 3 3 N 4 3 3

East Islip 4 N 4 4 N N 4 4 4 4

East Quogue 3 3 3 3

Eastport-South Manor 3 2 N N

Greenport 3 3

Hauppauge 4 S 4 4 4 4 4

Islip N N N N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Longwood 3 N N N N N N 3 1 3 2 2 N N N 2 1 3 3 3

Miller Place 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Montauk 4 4 4 4 4 4

Mount Sinai 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Patchogue-Medford S S S S S S S 3 3 3 3 3 3 S S S S

Rocky Point 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Sachem 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 S 3 3 3 S 3 3 3

Shoreham-Wading River 4 3 3

South Country 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4

Three Village S S S S

Tuckahoe Common S S S S S

West Islip 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Westhampton Beach 3

Mode (most often selected rating) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 #N/A 4 3 3

% "Excellent" Ratings (4) 35.7% 25.0% 22.2% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 50.0% 20.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 33.3% 33.3% 50.0% 50.0% 28.6% 33.3% 50.0% 37.5% 37.5%

% "Good" Ratings (3) 64.3% 75.0% 77.8% 66.7% 66.7% 55.6% 50.0% 80.0% 66.7% 60.0% 100.0% 62.5% 62.5% 66.7% 66.7% 50.0% 50.0% 57.1% 33.3% 40.0% 62.5% 62.5%

% "Fair" Ratings (2) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0%

% "Poor" Ratings (1) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


ESBOCES- EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CoSer Survey Subscriptions 2014-15 - Part 1b

2014-15 Special Education

District 12-1

-4 S

pe

ech

/Lan

gu

ag

e (

Ind

ivid

ua

l)

12-1

-4 S

pe

ech

/Lan

gu

ag

e (

Gro

up

)

12-1

-4 V

isio

n/Im

pa

ire

d

Mo

bilit

y (

Ind

ivid

ua

l)

8-1

-1 S

pe

cia

l C

lass

8-1

-1 C

ou

ns

elin

g (

Ind

ivid

ua

l)

8-1

-1 C

ou

ns

elin

g (

Gro

up

)

8-1

-1 E

SL

(In

div

idu

al)

8-1

-1 O

ccu

pa

tio

nal

Th

era

py

(In

div

idu

al)

8-1

-1 P

hy

sic

al T

he

rap

y (

Ind

ivid

ual)

8-1

-1 S

pe

ech

/Lan

gu

ag

e (

Ind

ivid

ua

l)

8-1

-1 S

pe

ech

/Lan

gu

ag

e (

Gro

up

)

8-1

-1 I

nd

ivid

ual

Aid

e

8-1

-1 A

uti

sm

/Beh

avio

ral

Co

ns

ult

ati

on

& T

rain

ing

s

8-1

-1 A

/B -

Ho

me A

pp

.

Beh

avio

r A

naly

sis

8-1

-1 A

uti

sm

/Beh

avio

ral –

Pare

nt

Tra

inin

g

Su

mm

er

Sch

oo

l S

pe

cia

l E

du

cati

on

Psych

olo

gic

al S

erv

ices

Ho

sp

ital

Bo

un

d –

No

n-.

Cla

ssif

ied

Stu

den

ts

Psych

iatr

ic C

on

su

ltan

t

Au

gm

en

tati

ve C

om

mu

nic

ati

on

Assis

tive T

ech

no

log

y

Coser # 204.2

55

204.2

60

204.2

65

205.1

00

205.2

05

205.2

10

205.2

15

205.2

35

205.2

45

205.2

55

205.2

60

205.2

75

205.2

90

205.2

95

205.2

97

208.1

10

312.1

10

438.1

20

515.8

00

519.2

00

519.4

00

Total Service Ratings

Average Rating 3.0 3.4 3.0 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.4 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.0 2.5 3.7 3.7 2.5

Number of District Ratings 3 8 4 21 17 16 2 17 14 19 18 15 5 6 12 5 4 4 6 3 4

Bayport-Blue Point 3 N N N N N N N 3 3

6

Comsewogue 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 N N N 17

East Hampton 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3

10

East Islip 4 4 N N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

16

East Quogue 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 N 14

Eastport-South Manor N 1 N N 1 1 2 1 N 1

8

Fire Island 4

1

Greenport 3 3 3 4 4 4

8

Hauppauge 4 S 4 4 4 4 4 4 S 4 S S S S 14

Islip 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 22

Longwood 3 3 3 2 2 N N 2 2 N 1 1 3

21

Miller Place 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 N 4 N 2 24

Montauk 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 N 14

Mount Sinai 4 4 4 4 S 4 4 4 S 4 4 4 24

Patchogue-Medford S S S S S S S S S S S 3 4

8

Remsenburg-Speonk 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

7

Rocky Point 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 N

29

Sachem 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 S 3 S

27

Shoreham-Wading Rvr 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 N 3

14

South Country 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 1 32

Tuckahoe Common S S S S S S S S S

0

Wainscott 4 4

2

West Islip 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 N N 3 3

17

Westhampton Beach 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3

13

Mode (most often selected rating) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 4 4 #N/A 348

% "Excellent" Ratings (4) 0.0% 37.5% 0.0% 38.1% 29.4% 25.0% 0.0% 47.1% 35.7% 42.1% 33.3% 26.7% 40.0% 33.3% 33.3% 20.0% 50.0% 0.0% 66.7% 66.7% 25.0%

% "Good" Ratings (3) 100.0% 62.5% 100.0% 57.1% 64.7% 68.8% 100.0% 47.1% 64.3% 42.1% 50.0% 66.7% 60.0% 50.0% 50.0% 80.0% 25.0% 50.0% 33.3% 33.3% 25.0%

% "Fair" Ratings (2) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 6.3% 0.0% 5.9% 0.0% 10.5% 11.1% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0%

% "Poor" Ratings (1) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 16.7% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0%


ESBOCES- EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CoSer Survey Subscriptions 2014-15 - Part 2a

2014-15 Career & Technical Education Education and Information Support Services

District Care

er

& T

ech

nic

al

Ed

uc

ati

on

Sp

ecia

l C

are

er

Ed

uc

ati

on

12-1

-1

Sp

ecia

l C

are

er

Ed

uc

ati

on

8-1

-1

Reg

ion

al S

um

mer

Sch

oo

l

Exp

lora

tory

En

rich

men

t

Vis

itin

g E

xp

ert

s -

En

rich

men

t P

rog

ram

-

Pro

ject

Wis

e

Vis

itin

g E

xp

ert

s -

En

rich

men

t P

rog

ram

-

Reg

. Q

uiz

Bo

wl

Art

s-I

n-E

du

cati

on

/Vis

itin

g

Exp

ert

s

Art

s-I

n-E

du

cati

on

-

Co

nfe

ren

ce f

or

Kid

s

Sch

oo

l L

ibra

ry

Au

tom

ati

on

Lib

rary

Serv

ices/M

ed

ia

Stu

de

nt

Assis

tan

ce

Serv

ice

NY

S C

urr

icu

lum

&

Assessm

en

t S

erv

ice

(NY

SC

AS

)

MY

Le

arn

ing

Pla

n (

ML

P)

Cu

sto

miz

ed

Sta

ff

Develo

pm

en

t

Cu

rric

ulu

m W

ork

sh

op

s

Co

mp

reh

en

siv

e

Cu

rric

ulu

m D

evelo

pm

en

t

Ed

uc

ati

on

al L

ead

ers

hip

,

Develo

pm

en

t &

Pla

cem

en

t S

erv

ice

Sta

ff D

evelo

pm

en

t –

Pu

bli

c R

ela

tio

ns

NY

SE

D L

ead

er

Tra

inin

g f

or

Gr

3-8

A

ssessm

en

ts

CoSer # 101.1

00

103.1

10

103.1

20

432.1

10

405.1

00

435.1

10

435.1

30

440.1

00

440.1

20

508.1

00

516.2

10

525.1

10

531.1

00

531.2

00

531.3

00

531.3

15

531.3

50

531.4

00

531.4

40

531.5

00

Average Rating 3.4 3.2 2.9 3.3 4.0 3.3 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.3 3.8 3.6

Number of District Ratings 20 16 8 4 3 4 5 15 4 20 20 5 14 18 15 20 4 6 6 5

Amagansett

N

4 4

4

N

4

Bayport-Blue Point 3 3 3 N

N

N N

N 3 N N

N N

Bridgehampton 4

4

4

4 4 4

4 4

Comsewogue 3 3

3

3 3 4

4 3 3 3 3

East Hampton 4

3 S 3 3

2 3

3

East Islip S 4

4

4

4 4

4 4 4 4 4 S 4 4

East Quogue 3 3 3 N N

3 3

3 2

Eastport-South Manor 3 1 1

4 3

3 3

3 4 3 3

N

Fire Island

4

4

4 3

3

N 3

Fishers Island

3

4 4 S

Greenport 4 4

3

3

3

Hauppauge 3 S

4 S 4 4

3 4 4 3 S

Islip 3 4

3 3

4 3 3

3 3 S 3 3 3

Little Flower

3 3

3

Longwood 4 3 3 4

4 4

4 S

4 4 S S 4 4

4

Miller Place 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

4

Montauk

N

N

4 4

4 N N

Mount Sinai 4 4

4

4

4 4

4 4 4 4

Patchogue-Medford 3 S S 2 S 4 3 3

4 4 3 3

N 2 N

Remsenburg-Speonk 4

N

4

N N

4 4

Rocky Point 4 3 N 3 N 3 N 3 3

N 3 3 3

3 4

Sachem 3 3 3 S

S

S S

S S S S

S

Sagaponack Common

4 4

Shoreham-Wading River 3 4 3 N N

S

S S

S 3 N 3

3 3

South Country 4 4 4

4

4 S 4 4

4 4 4

4

4

Three Village S S S N

3 3 S S

3 4 N N

3 4

Tuckahoe Common S

S S

S S S

Wainscott Common

4 4

West Islip 3 3

3

3 3

4 3 4 4

Westhampton Beach 3 2

3 N N

3

4

4

3 4

N

Mode (most often selected rating) 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 4

% "Excellent" Ratings (4) 40.0% 37.5% 12.5% 50.0% 100.0% 25.0% 60.0% 46.7% 50.0% 55.0% 50.0% 60.0% 35.7% 55.6% 60.0% 40.0% 50.0% 33.3% 83.3% 60.0%

% "Good" Ratings (3) 60.0% 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 40.0% 53.3% 50.0% 45.0% 50.0% 40.0% 64.3% 38.9% 33.3% 55.0% 50.0% 66.7% 16.7% 40.0%

% "Fair" Ratings (2) 0.0% 6.3% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.6% 6.7% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

% "Poor" Ratings (1) 0.0% 6.3% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%



2014-15 Education and Information Support Services

District Sco

rin

g f

or

NY

SE

D

Gr.

3-8

&

NY

SE

SL

AT

NY

S

Alt

ern

ati

ve

Assessm

en

t R

eg

. T

est

Sco

rin

g

Ath

lete

s

Help

ing

A

thle

tes

Mo

de

l

Sch

oo

ls

RT

Im D

irect

IEP

Dir

ect

Me

dic

aid

Mo

du

le

NY

SE

D

irecto

rs

Do

cu

men

t

Rep

os

ito

ry &

Fa

x D

irect

Cen

tris

Syn

c

Po

werS

ch

oo

l

Infi

nit

e

Cam

pu

s

eS

ch

oo

l D

ata

AIM

Sw

eb

eB

oa

rd

Sch

oo

lTo

ol

No

rth

west

Evalu

ati

on

Asso

c.

Rig

ht

Reaso

n

Te

ch

no

log

y

BA

RS

on

th

e

Web

Te

st

Scan

nin

g

an

d

Rep

ort

ing

CoSer # 531.5

10

531.5

60

531.6

10

532.1

00

601.0

30

601.0

40

601.0

50

601.0

60

601.0

70

601.0

80

601.5

10

601.6

10

601.7

10

601.8

10

601.8

30

601.8

50

601.8

60

601.8

90

601.9

60

601.9

90

Average Rating 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.1 3.8 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.0 3.6 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.1 3.6


Amagansett

4 4

N N 4

4

4 4 4

4

Bayport-Blue Point 3

N

3

N

3 N

3

N

Bridgehampton 3 3

3

3 3

S

3

3

2 3

Comsewogue 3 3

3

3

N 3

East Hampton 3 3

3

3

4

3

East Islip 4 4

4

4

4

N

4

4

East Quogue 4 4

2

3

4

Eastport-South Manor 3 3

1

4

3

4

4

4

Fire Island 3

4

4

4

3

Fishers Island 4

S

4

2

3

Greenport

3

4

3

4

3

Hauppauge 4 4

4

4

4 4

4

4

Islip 3 3 3 3

3 S S

3 3

3

Little Flower

3

4 4

4

Longwood

4

4

4

4 4 4

4

4

4

Miller Place 3 3 4 3

3 3 3

3

N

3

3 N 3 3 3

Montauk

4

4 4 4

N

4 4 4

4

4

Mount Sinai 4 4

3

3

3

4

New Suffolk N

4

Patchogue-Medford 4 4

3

S S 3 4

3 3

4

Remsenburg-Speonk 4 4

4

4

4

4 N

4

Rocky Point 3 3 3 3 3 3

3

3

3 3 3

3

Sachem S 3 S S

4 4 4 4 4

S

Sagaponack Common

4

Shoreham-Wading Rvr 3 2

N

4 4 3

3

2

N

South Country 4 4

4

4 N

3

N

4 4

Three Village

3

3

4 S

3

3

2 3 3

Tuckahoe Common

S

S

S

S

S

3 S

Wainscott Common 4

4 S 4

4 3

3

4

West Islip 4 4

3

4

1 3

N

4 4

Westhampton Beach

3

N

3

4 4 3 3



% "Good" Ratings (3) 50.0% 50.0% 66.7% 53.3% 25.0% 35.3% 40.0% 45.5% 0.0% 42.9% 57.1% 33.3% 60.0% 61.5% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 36.4% 57.1% 40.7%

% "Fair" Ratings (2) 0.0% 4.5% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.1% 14.3% 0.0%

% "Poor" Ratings (1) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%



2014-15 Education and Information Support Services

District Sco

rin

g f

or

NY

SE

D

Gr.

3-8

&

NY

SE

SL

AT

NY

S

Alt

ern

ati

ve

Asse

ssm

en

t

Reg

. T

es

t

Sco

rin

g

Ath

lete

s

Help

ing

Ath

lete

s

Mo

de

l

Sch

oo

ls

RT

Im D

irect

IEP

Dir

ec

t

Me

dic

aid

Mo

du

le

NY

SE

Dir

ecto

rs

Do

cu

me

nt

Rep

osit

ory

& F

ax

Dir

ec

t

Cen

tris

Syn

c

Po

wer

Sch

oo

l

Infi

nit

e

Cam

pu

s

eS

ch

oo

l

Data

AIM

Sw

eb

eB

oard

Sch

oo

lTo

ol

No

rth

we

st

Evalu

ati

on

Ass

oc.

Rig

ht

Reas

on

Te

ch

no

log

y

BA

RS

on

th

e W

eb

Te

st

S

can

nin

g

an

d

Rep

ort

ing

Coser # 531

.51

0

531

.56

0

531

.61

0

532

.10

0

601

.03

0

601

.04

0

601

.05

0

601

.06

0

601

.07

0

601

.08

0

601

.51

0

601

.61

0

601

.71

0

601

.81

0

601

.83

0

601

.85

0

601

.86

0

601

.89

0

601

.96

0

601

.99

0

Average Rating 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.1 3.8 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.0 3.6 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.1 3.6


Amagansett

4 4

N N 4

4

4 4 4

4

Bayport-Blue Point 3

N

3

N

3 N

3

N

Bridgehampton 3 3

3

3 3

S

3

3

2 3

Comsewogue 3 3

3

3

N 3

East Hampton 3 3

3

3

4

3

East Islip 4 4

4

4

4

N

4

4

East Quogue 4 4

2

3

4

Eastport-South Manor 3 3

1

4

3

4

4

4

Fire Island 3

4

4

4

3

Fishers Island 4

S

4

2

3

Greenport

3

4

3

4

3

Hauppauge 4 4

4

4

4 4

4

4

Islip 3 3 3 3

3 S S

3 3

3

Little Flower

3

4 4

4

Longwood

4

4

4

4 4 4

4

4

4

Miller Place 3 3 4 3

3 3 3

3

N

3

3 N 3 3 3

Montauk

4

4 4 4

N

4 4 4

4

4

Mount Sinai 4 4

3

3

3

4

New Suffolk N

4

Patchogue-Medford 4 4

3

S S 3 4

3 3

4

Remsenburg-Speonk 4 4

4

4

4

4 N

4

Rocky Point 3 3 3 3 3 3

3

3

3 3 3

3

Sachem S 3 S S

4 4 4 4 4

S

Sagaponack Common

4

Shoreham-Wading River 3 2

N

4 4 3

3

2

N

South Country 4 4

4

4 N

3

N

4 4

Three Village

3

3

4 S

3

3

2 3 3

Tuckahoe Common

S

S

S

S

S

3 S

Wainscott Common 4

4 S 4

4 3

3

4

West Islip 4 4

3

4

1 3

N

4 4

Westhampton Beach

3

N

3

4 4 3 3



% "Good" Ratings (3) 50.0% 50.0% 66.7% 53.3% 25.0% 35.3% 40.0% 45.5% 0.0% 42.9% 57.1% 33.3% 60.0% 61.5% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 36.4% 57.1% 40.7%

% "Fair" Ratings (2) 0.0% 4.5% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.1% 14.3% 0.0%

% "Poor" Ratings (1) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


ESBOCES- EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CoSer Survey Subscriptions 2014-15 - Part 2c

2014-15 Regional Information Center (RIC)

District Tra

ns

po

rtati

on

Ma

nag

em

en

t

& R

ou

tin

g

e-R

ate

Inte

llip

ath

LA

N/W

AN

Su

pp

ort

Ele

cti

on

Ma

nag

em

en

t

Syste

ms

Cafe

teri

a

Syste

ms

PO

S

Cap

ital

Pro

jects

ED

GE

An

nu

al

Lic

en

se

Em

ail

Arc

hiv

ing

Em

erg

en

cy

No

tifi

cati

on

Syste

ms

Fin

an

ce

Ma

nag

er

SA

N –

Off

sit

e

Data

Sto

rag

e

Fa

cilit

ies

Ma

nag

em

en

t S

yste

ms

Dis

tan

ce

Le

arn

ing

–

Safa

ri

Inte

rnet

Serv

ice

Pro

vis

ion

ing

Sch

oo

l B

an

k

- In

tro

S

erv

ice

Sch

oo

l

Ban

k –

Fu

ll

Serv

ice K

-12

Sch

oo

l B

an

k

- In

clu

siv

e

Serv

ice

NY

S

Req

uir

ed

R

ep

ort

ing

NY

S D

ata

Valid

ati

on

(Cert

ify)

Inte

llip

ath

Lin

e C

ha

rge

s

Veri

zo

n

Ph

on

e

Ch

arg

es

CoSer # 601.0

90

601.1

10

601.3

40

601.4

10

601.4

15

601.4

20

601.4

30

601.4

35

601.4

40

601.4

55

601.4

65

601.4

75

444.3

10

514.2

10

514.4

10

514.4

30

514.4

70

514.5

30

514.5

40

644.1

10

644.1

50

Total Services Rated

Average Rating 3.5 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.0 4.0 3.4 3.8 3.4 3.1 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.0 3.4 4.0 3.6 3.8 3.2 3.2

Number of District Ratings 4 9 12 7 3 1 10 4 10 19 6 3 3 8 1 9 5 28 5 9 6 61

Amagansett

4 3 3 3

4

4 4

19

Bayport-Blue Point N N N N N

N N

N

N

3

N N 9

Bridgehampton

S

S S

3 S

3

19

Comsewogue 4 3 4

3 3

4

3

4

3 2 26

East Hampton

S 2

3

3

16

East Islip 4 4 N N

4 4

4 N

4 4 4

27

East Quogue

N 4 3

4

4

16

Eastport-South Manor 4

4

4

N 4

N

4

N

4

3 3 27

Fire Island N

N 3

3

3 4

15

Fishers Island

3

3

S

9

Greenport

3

3 3

4

3

15

Hauppauge

4 4

4

4

S

4

4 4

23

Islip 3 3 3

3

3 3

S 3

3

3

3 3 31

Little Flower

3

3

4

10

Longwood 4 4 4

4

4 4 4

4

4 4

4 S 32

Miller Place 3 3 3

3 3 N 3

3

3

3

3

2 N 36

Montauk

4

4

4

4

16

Mount Sinai

S

S

S S

4 4 4

19

New Suffolk

4

2

Patchogue-Medford 4 4 4

3

S 3

4

S 4

4 4 27

Remsenburg-Speonk

N

N 4

N

4

4

14

Rocky Point 3 3 3 3

3

N 2

3 3

N 3 3 3 N 34

Sachem S S S

S

S

S S

S S 9

Sagaponack Common

4

4

Shoreham-Wading River

N

N 2

S

N 3

16

South Country 4 4 4

4 4 4 3 4

4 4

4 4 31

Three Village S

S S

S

S 2

S

3

3

17

Tuckahoe Common

S

S S

1

Wainscott Common

4

10

West Islip 3 3

3

3

4 3

3

3

4

3 3 28

Westhampton Beach

3

3

3

3

18

Mode (most often selected rating) 4 3 4 4 3 #N/A 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 #N/A 3 4 4 4 3 3 576

% "Excellent" Ratings (4) 50.0% 44.4% 58.3% 57.1% 0.0% 100.0% 40.0% 75.0% 40.0% 31.6% 50.0% 33.3% 33.3% 50.0% 0.0% 44.4% 100.0% 60.7% 80.0% 33.3% 33.3%

% "Good" Ratings (3) 50.0% 55.6% 41.7% 42.9% 100.0% 0.0% 60.0% 25.0% 60.0% 47.4% 50.0% 66.7% 66.7% 50.0% 100.0% 55.6% 0.0% 39.3% 20.0% 55.6% 50.0%

% "Fair" Ratings (2) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 21.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 16.7%

% "Poor" Ratings (1) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


ESBOCES- MANAGEMENT SERVICES CoSer Survey Subscriptions 2014-15 Pt. 1a

2014-15 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

District Sh

are

d

Sch

oo

l

Bu

sin

ess

Serv

ices

ES

BO

CE

S

Mo

bile

Safe

ty

Bu

s

Dis

tric

t

Pri

nti

ng

/

Du

pli

cati

on

ES

BO

CE

S

Sp

ecia

l E

d.

Tra

ns

po

rtati

on

Tra

ns

po

rtati

on

- S

pe

cia

l

Care

er

&

Te

ch

nic

al E

d.

Tra

ns

po

rtati

on

-

Care

er

&

Te

ch

nic

al E

d.

Tra

ns

po

rtati

on

-

Co

ach

& F

ield

Tri

ps

Au

cti

on

Serv

ices

Tra

ns

po

rtati

on

- E

nri

ch

men

t

Pro

gra

m

No

n-P

ub

lic

Sch

oo

l

Tra

ns

po

rtati

on

Sch

oo

l

Fo

od

S

erv

ice

Pro

gra

m

Sh

are

d

Sch

oo

l

Bu

sin

ess

Off

ice

Su

pp

ort

No

np

ub

lic

Sch

oo

l

Te

xtb

oo

k

Dis

trib

uti

on

P

rog

ram

Bu

s D

rivers

Dru

g/A

lco

ho

l

Te

sti

ng

/\

Ph

ysic

als

NY

SE

D B

asic

Bu

s D

river

Tra

inin

g

DM

V 1

9A

C

ert

ifie

d

Exam

ine

r

Co

urs

e

NY

SE

D

Ad

van

ced

Bu

s D

river

T

rain

ing

NY

SE

D

Sch

oo

l

Bu

s D

river

In

st.

Tra

inin

g

DM

V B

us

Dri

ver

Ab

str

act

Serv

ices

DM

V 1

9A

Bu

s D

river

Fil

e A

ud

it

NY

SE

D

Pre

-Serv

ice

Dri

ver

Tra

inin

g

NY

SE

D B

us

Dri

ver

Mo

nit

or/

A

tten

d B

asic

Tra

inin

g

NY

SE

D

Pre

-Serv

ice

Mo

nth

ly

/Att

en

da

nce

T

rain

ing

CoSer # 302.1

00

417.1

00

505.1

00

603.1

10

604.1

10

604.1

20

604.1

30

605.1

00

607.1

10

607.1

20

610.0

10

611.1

00

623.1

10

624.1

10

624.1

30

624.1

40

624.1

50

624.1

60

624.1

70

624.1

90

624.2

00

624.2

10

624.2

20

Average Rating 0.0 3.1 3.8 3.1 3.0 3.3 2.8 4.0 0.0 2.7 3.0 0.0 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.0

Number of District Ratings 0 4 6 11 1 4 6 1 0 3 1 0 27 6 2 1 0 0 2 1 2 2 1

Amagansett

4

3 4 4

4 4

Bridgehampton

4

N

4

Comsewogue

3 3 3 3

3

4

4

4 N

East Hampton

3

3

3

3 S S

East Islip

4 4

N

4

East Quogue

3

4

Eastport-South Manor

3

Fire Island

3 N

4

3 3 N 3

N

Greenport

3

Hauppauge

S

4 4

Islip

3

3

4

Longwood

S

4

Miller Place

4 3

3

3

Montauk

4 4

4

4

Mount Sinai

3.5

3.5

4

New Suffolk Common

4

Patchogue-Medford

3

3

N

3 3

Port Jefferson

1

4 1

1

4

Remsenburg-Speonk

4

N

4

Rocky Point

N

N

4

Sachem S

S 3 S

S

S

S S

S

Sagaponack Common

4

Sayville

S S

S

S


N

4

3 4

South Country

4

Springs

3

Three Village

2

3

3 3

N

3 N

N

N

N 3 3

Tuckahoe Common

4

3

West Islip

S

4 4

Westhampton Beach

N

3

Mode (most often selected rating) #N/A #N/A 4 3 #N/A 3 3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 4 4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

% "Excellent" Ratings (4) #DIV/0! 25.0% 83.3% 27.3% 0.0% 25.0% 16.7% 100.0% #DIV/0! 33.3% 0.0% #DIV/0! 59.3% 66.7% 50.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 50.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%

% "Good" Ratings (3) #DIV/0! 25.0% 16.7% 54.5% 100.0% 75.0% 66.7% 0.0% #DIV/0! 33.3% 100.0% #DIV/0! 40.7% 33.3% 50.0% 100.0% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% "Fair" Ratings (2) #DIV/0! 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

% "Poor" Ratings (1) #DIV/0! 0.0% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% #DIV/0! 33.3% 0.0% #DIV/0! 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


ESBOCES- MANAGEMENT SERVICES CoSer Survey Subscriptions 2014-15 Pt. 1b

2014-15 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUSINESS SERVICES OTHER SERVICES HUMAN

RESOURCES

District NY

SE

D B

us

Dri

ve

r

Refr

esh

er

Tra

inin

g -

Dri

ve

r/M

on

ito

r

NY

SE

D B

us

Dri

ve

r/M

on

ito

r

Ph

ysic

al

Perf

m T

est

DM

V 1

9A

Bu

s

Dri

ve

r

Bie

nn

ial/

An

nu

al T

est

Defe

nsiv

e

Dri

vin

g

NY

SE

D

CP

R/F

irst

Aid

for

Att

en

d.

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

- S

hare

d

Man

ag

em

en

t

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

- C

hild

Safe

ty

Zo

ne

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

- M

ap

pin

g

Serv

ices

Med

ia &

Co

mm

un

ity

Rela

tio

ns

Serv

ices -

Gen

era

l

Med

ia/

Co

mm

un

ity

PR

Co

nsu

ltin

g

Serv

ices

Co

op

era

tiv

e

Bid

din

g

Healt

h

Insu

ran

ce

Co

ord

inati

on

Serv

ice -

(E

ast

En

d)

Healt

h

Insu

ran

ce

Co

ord

.

Serv

ices -

(Su

ffo

lk

BO

CE

S)

Wo

rkers

Co

mp

.

Co

nso

rtiu

m

Co

ord

inato

r

Em

plo

ye

e

Assis

tan

ce

Pro

gra

m

(EA

P)

Healt

h &

Safe

ty

Co

nsu

ltan

t

Healt

h &

Safe

ty B

asic

Serv

ice

Healt

h &

Safe

ty

Weath

er

Serv

ice

Healt

h &

Safe

ty -

Sp

ecia

list

Healt

h/S

afe

ty -

Secu

rity

Co

nsu

ltan

t

Glo

bal

Co

mp

lian

ce

Neg

oti

ati

on

s

Info

rmati

on

Serv

ices

Su

bsti

tute

Serv

ice -

Basic

Leve

l

CoSer # 62

4.2

25

62

4.2

30

62

4.2

40

62

4.2

50

62

4.2

80

62

9.1

10

62

9.1

20

62

9.1

30

60

9.1

00

60

9.3

00

61

2.1

10

63

3.1

10

63

3.1

20

63

3.1

30

61

7.1

00

61

8.1

10

61

8.1

20

61

8.1

40

61

8.1

50

61

8.1

60

61

8.2

10

60

2.1

10

62

8.1

00

Average Rating 3.5 3.3 4.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.8 3.5 3.5 3.8 3.3 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.5 4.0 2.5 3.5

Number of District Ratings 2 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 7 25 5 2 8 12 3 19 2 5 2 3 6 13 205

Amagansett 4 4 4 4

4 3

N 12

Bridgehampton

3

3

3

3 6

Comsewogue

3

3

4

3

3 13

East Hampton S S S S 3

3

3

3

3

S 9

East Islip

4 4

4

4 4 S S S S 4 9

East Quogue

4 N

4

4

Eastport-South Manor

4

2 4

4

4 S S 6

Fire Island 3 N N

N

4

2

8

Greenport

4 4

4

3

5

Hauppauge

4

4

4

3 4 7

Islip

3

3 4 3.5

4

4 9

Little Flower

3

4

2

Longwood

4

4

4

2 4 6

Miller Place

4

3

3 3

3 9

Montauk

4 N

4

6

Mount Sinai

3.5

3

3 3 7

New Suffolk Common

4

2

Patchogue-Medford

S

4

S S

4

4

7

Port Jefferson

3 3

4

3 4

3 11

Remsenburg-Speonk

4 4

4

S 5

Rocky Point

4 3

N N

2 4

3 6

Sachem

S

4 S S

S

2

Sagaponack Common

1

Sayville

S

S

S

S S

1 3 2


4 4

4 S 4

4

4 9

South Country

4

4

4

4 5

Springs

1

Three Village

3 N N

3 3 4 3

3

3

3

N 4 16

Tuckahoe Common

4 4

4 4 3 3

4 9

West Islip

4

4

4

Westhampton Beach

3 4 3

4

4

2 7

Mode (most often selected rating) #N/A 3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 4 4 4 #N/A 4 4 3 3 4 4 #N/A 4 3 4 205

% "Excellent" Ratings (4) 50.0% 33.3% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 71.4% 60.0% 80.0% 50.0% 62.5% 83.3% 33.3% 42.1% 100.0% 60.0% 50.0% 100.0% 16.7% 53.8%

% "Good" Ratings (3) 50.0% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% #DIV/0! 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 28.6% 36.0% 20.0% 50.0% 25.0% 16.7% 66.7% 47.4% 0.0% 20.0% 50.0% 0.0% 33.3% 46.2%

% "Fair" Ratings (2) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0%

% "Poor" Ratings (1) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0%


ESBOCES SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES CoSer Survey Subscriptions 2014-15 2014-15 Supplemental Services

District Op

t. 3

(6

-1-1

)

(Weste

rn S

uff

olk

BO

CE

S)

Su

mm

er

Han

dic

ap

ped

-

(Weste

rn S

uff

olk

BO

CE

S)

Ou

tdo

or/

En

vir

on

men

tal

Ed

ucati

on

-

(Weste

rn S

uff

olk

BO

CE

S)

Ho

sp

ital

Instr

ucti

on

-

(Weste

rn S

uff

olk

BO

CE

S)

Sta

ff

Develo

pm

en

t

(Weste

rn S

uff

olk

BO

CE

S)

Sta

ff

Develo

pm

en

t

(Nassau

BO

CE

S)

Cu

rric

ulu

m

Develo

pm

en

t -

(Pu

tnam

BO

CE

S)

Ele

men

tary

Scie

nce K

its -

(Mo

nro

e #

2

BO

CE

S)

Po

lic

y M

an

ual

Develo

p.

- (

Eri

e

1 B

OC

ES

)

Sta

te A

id

Pla

nn

ing

-

(Qu

esta

r III

BO

CE

S)

GA

SB

45 (

Cap

ital

Reg

ion

BO

CE

S)

Lo

ng

Ran

ge

Pla

nn

ing

(Weste

rn S

uff

olk

BO

CE

S)

On

lin

e

Ap

plicati

on

Serv

ice -

(Pu

tnam

BO

CE

S)

Insu

ran

ce

Man

ag

em

en

t

Serv

ices -

Fle

xib

le B

en

efi

ts

(Weste

rn S

uff

olk

BO

CE

S)

CoSer # 26

0.4

90

28

0.4

90

46

0.4

90

47

7.4

90

55

0.4

90

56

5.4

90

56

9.4

90

57

0.4

90

65

7.4

90

66

5.4

90

67

6.4

90

68

5.4

90

69

0.4

90

69

5.4

90

Average Rating 3.4 3.8 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.9 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.8

Number of District Ratings 5 4 4 8 10 4 4 7 6 22 13 3 17 4 111

Amagansett

4

4 3 4

4

5

Bayport-Blue Point 4 4 N 4 N N

N

N

N

3

Bridgehampton

3 3

4

3

Comsewogue

N

3

3 3

3

4

East Hampton

3 S

3 S

2

East Islip 3 4 S S S 4

N 4 4 4 4 4

8

Eastport-South Manor S

S 4 3 S

4 4

4 4 6

Fire Island

N

N

4 4

4

3

Greenport

4

4

2

Hauppauge 4 4

3 3 3

4 4 S 4 4 9

Islip S S 3 S S 3

3 3

4

5

Little Flower

3

4

4

3

Longwood N N N N N N

N

4

1

Miller Place

N

3

3 4

4 3

5

Mount Sinai

4

3

4

4 4 3 3

7

Patchogue-Medford S S

S 4 N 3

4 4

4

Port Jefferson 3

4

3

4

4 4

4 4 8

Remsenburg-Speonk

N

3

4 4

3

Rocky Point N N

2 N N 3

3 4 3

3

6

Sachem S S S 3 S S

4

s

2

Sagaponack Common

4

1

Shoreham-Wading River S

N S 3

2

4 4

4

5

South Country N

N

4

4

2

Three Village

N N

4

4

2

Tuckahoe Common

N

4

1

West Islip 3 3

3 4

2

3 3

3 8

Westhampton Beach

4 3

2

3

Mode (most often selected rating) 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 111

% "Excellent" Ratings (4) 40.0% 75.0% 50.0% 37.5% 30.0% 25.0% 0.0% 57.1% 50.0% 86.4% 53.8% 66.7% 76.5% 75.0%

% "Good" Ratings (3) 60.0% 25.0% 50.0% 50.0% 70.0% 75.0% 100.0% 14.3% 50.0% 13.6% 46.2% 33.3% 17.6% 25.0%

% "Fair" Ratings (2) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 0.0%

% "Poor" Ratings (1) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


ESBOCES ADDITIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES CoSer Survey Subscriptions 2014-15

2014-15 Additional Support Services

District Off

ice

of

Dis

tric

t

Su

peri

nte

nd

en

t

(D

ean

Lu

cera

)

Off

ice o

f C

hie

f

Op

era

tin

g O

ffic

er

(J. L

utz

)

Off

ice o

f

Ed

ucati

on

al

Serv

ices

(P. S

taib

)

Off

ice o

f

Man

ag

em

en

t

Serv

ices

(B. S

ala

tto

)

Dep

art

men

t

of

Hu

man

Reso

urc

es

(T.

McS

ween

ey)

Reg

ion

al

Cert

ific

ati

on

Off

ice

Bilin

gu

al/

ES

L

Tech

nic

al

Assis

tan

ce

Cen

ter

(BE

TA

C)

Reg

ion

al

Sp

ecia

l

Ed

ucati

on

–

Tech

nic

al

Assis

tan

ce

Su

pp

ort

Cen

ter

(RS

E-T

AS

C)

Fam

ily

Ed

ucati

on

Ou

treach

Pro

gra

ms

(M

igra

nt

Pro

gra

ms

,

Ho

me

less

,

Ev

en

Sta

rt)

Valu

e o

f

Cu

rric

ulu

m

Co

un

cil

Part

icip

ati

on

Valu

e o

f

Co

un

cil o

f

Ad

min

istr

ato

rs

of

Sp

ecia

l E

d.

(CA

SE

)

Part

icip

ati

on

Valu

e o

f

Co

un

cil

of

Sch

oo

l

Bu

sin

es

s

Off

icia

ls

Part

icip

ati

on

Valu

e o

f

Co

un

cil

of

Sch

oo

l

Hu

man

Reso

urc

es

Ad

min

istr

ato

rs

Part

icip

ati

on

Average Rating 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.6

Number of District Ratings 26 27 25 25 26 27 23 24 16 20 17 22 18 296

Amagansett 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 N 4 N 4 4 11

Bridgehampton 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 N 3 3 3 3 12

Center Moriches 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 13

Comsewogue 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 13

East Hampton S S 4 S 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 S S 8

East Islip 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 13

East Quogue 4 4 4 N N 4 3 4 2 N N N 3 8

Eastport-South Manor 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 2 N/A 4 4 12

Fire Island 4 4 2 3 N 4 3 3 N N N 4 N 8

Fishers Island 3 3 3

N 2

4

Greenport 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 N N 4 N 10

Hauppauge S S S 4 4 4 S S S 3 S S S 4

Islip 4 4 4 4 4 4 3.5 4 S 4 4 4 4 12

Little Flower 4 4 N 4 4 N N N N N N 4 N 5

Longwood 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 13

Miller Place 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 N 3 3 3 3 12

Montauk 4 4 4 4 N 4 4 4 N N N N N 7

Mount Sinai 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 13

New Suffolk Common 4 4 4 4 4 4 N S S S S S S 6

Patchogue-Medford 3 3 S 3 3 4 4 3 S 3 S 2 3 10

Port Jefferson 3 3 3 4 3 4 N N N 3 3 3 3 10

Remsenburg-Speonk 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 N 4 4 N 11

Rocky Point 4 4 3 3 3 3 N 3 N 2 N 2 3 10

Sachem S S S S S S S 3 S S 4 S S 2

Sagaponack Common 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 13

Sayville S S S S 4 S S S S S S S S 1

Shoreham-Wading River 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 3 4 N 12

South Country 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 13

Tuckahoe Common N N N 3 4 N N N N N N N N 2

Wainscott Common 4 4 N N N N 4 N 4 N N N N 4

West Islip N 4 4 N 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 11

Westhampton Beach 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 13

Mode (most often selected rating) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 296

% "Excellent" Ratings (4) 76.9% 77.8% 72.0% 80.0% 73.1% 77.8% 73.9% 66.7% 50.0% 50.0% 58.8% 68.2% 50.0%

% "Good" Ratings (3) 23.1% 22.2% 24.0% 20.0% 26.9% 18.5% 21.7% 33.3% 43.8% 35.0% 41.2% 22.7% 50.0%

% "Fair" Ratings (2) 0.0% 0.0% 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 6.3% 15.0% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0%

% "Poor" Ratings (1) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


Appendix C


SURVEY OF COSER SERVICES The CoSer Evaluation surveys sent via email to school district participants were tailored to highlight the specific services each district subscribed to during the 2014-2015 service year. Additionally, districts received an attachment of the “Shared Services Guide 2014-2015” which listed all of the services offered through the agency’s divisions that were available to every district. The surveys required respondents to rate the services the district subscribed to by indicating the degree of quality of each service (e.g. Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor). Respondents were also given the option of “Not applicable/Not enough information” if they felt they could not sufficiently rate a service. Finally, respondents were asked to provide comments about any of the services listed in the surveys they received, as well as other comments about the agency and its services and programs in general. METHODOLOGY

All percentages are, aside from those reported in the response rate, based on valid responses of those surveys that were actually completely with number ratings. Because the items were rated on a four point scale, each quality rating was assigned a number: “Excellent”=4; “Good”=3; “Fair”=2; and “Poor”=1. The “Not Applicable/Not Enough Information” choice was not assigned a number because in most instances the choice was selected due to the respondent not having direct contact with the program or he/she not being aware of the district’s subscription to the service. If the district “skipped” rating one of their services, an “S” was recorded. The percentage of respondents selecting each item is shown on the CoSer Survey Results.

Also, mean scores for services that were delivered to Eastern Suffolk BOCES districts and rated by significantly fewer respondents than other services may not be considered statistically significant in relation to services that received different or similar ratings. It should be kept in mind that not all services should be directly compared by their ratings due to the large gaps between the numbers of responses to some services. The number of responses each service received was calculated and listed underneath the mean rating for each service at the top of the CoSer Survey Result worksheets.


Appendix D

Districts Served by Eastern Suffolk BOCES in 2014-15


Eastern Suffolk Districts Amagansett Bay Shore Bayport-Blue Point Brentwood Bridgehampton Center Moriches Central Islip Comsewogue Connetquot East Hampton East Islip East Moriches East Quogue Eastport/South Manor Fire Island Fishers Island Greenport Hampton Bays Hauppauge Islip Little Flower Longwood Mattituck-Cutchogue Middle Country Miller Place Montauk Mount Sinai New Suffolk Common Oysterponds Patchogue-Medford Port Jefferson Quogue Remsenburg-Speonk Riverhead Rocky Point Sachem Sag Harbor Sagaponack Common Sayville Shelter Island Shoreham-Wading River South Country Southampton Southold Springs Three Village Tuckahoe Common Wainscott Common West Islip Westhampton Beach William Floyd

Western Suffolk Districts Amityville Babylon Cold Spring Harbor Commack Copiague Deer Park Elwood Half Hollow Hills Harborfields Huntington Kings Park Lindenhurst North Babylon Northport- E. Northport Smithtown South Huntington West Babylon Western Suffolk BOCES Wyandanch

Nassau Districts Baldwin Bellmore Bellmore-Merrick Carle Place East Meadow East Rockaway East Williston Elmont Farmingdale Freeport Garden City Glen Cove Great Neck Hempstead Herricks Hewlett-Woodmere Hicksville Island Park Island Trees Jericho Lawrence Levittown Locust Valley Long Beach Malverne Manhasset Massapequa Mineola Nassau BOCES

New Hyde Park-Garden City Park

North Bellmore North Shore (Sea Cliff) Oceanside Plainedge Plainview-Old Bethpage Port Washington Roosevelt Roslyn Seaford Sewanhaka Syosset Uniondale Valley Stream CHSD Valley Stream #13 Valley Stream #30 Wantagh West Hempstead Westbury

Districts Served by Eastern Suffolk BOCES in 2014-15


Other Districts Akron Ardsley Averill Park Bedford Brittonkill Broadalbin-Perth Byram Hills Capital Region BOCES Carthage Catskill Central Valley Clarkstown Coxsackie-Athens Croton-Harmon Dutchess BOCES East Greenbush East Irondequoit East Syracuse Eastchester Elmsford Erie 1 BOCES Fallsburg Fayetteville-Manlius Fort Ann Galway Goshen

Greater Southern Tier

BOCES Guilderland Harrison Highland Falls Horseheads Hyde Park Iroquois Irvington Ithaca City Katonah-Lewisboro Liberty Minisink Valley Monroe 2-Orleans BOCES Monticello Mount Pleasant Mount Vernon New Hartford Niagara Wheatfield Niskayuna North Salem North Syracuse North Tonawanda Nyack Onondaga-Cortland-

Madison BOCES Oppenheim-Ephratah Penn-Yan Putnam Valley

Queensbury Questar III BOCES Ramapo Randolph Ravena-Coeymans Royalton-Hartland Rush-Henrietta Rye City Rye Neck Saratoga Springs Schuylerville Sidney South Orangetown Southern-Westchester

BOCES St. Lawrence-Lewis

BOCES Syracuse Tuckahoe UFSD Tupper Lake Ulster BOCES Victor Walton Warwick Valley Washington-Saratoga-

Warren-Hamilton-Essex BOCES

West Genesee (Camillus) Yorktown Heights


Appendix E

Please rate the quality of the services provided by the Educational Services Division by indicating how wellthe services met your district's needs during the current service year. If you did not subscribe to a servicethat appears on the list below, then it is not necessary to specify a rating for that service. However, weencourage you to comment about why you did not subscribe to the service.

Additionally, at the conclusion of the survey you will find a section where you may include more generalcomments regarding the services provided by the Educational Services Division. The information youprovide will better enable the Agency to revise and improve upon the way it serves your district.

1. Educational Services Survey

2014-15 ESBOCES CoSer Survey - Educational Services - Sample

Excellent Good Fair Poor Not Enough Info

Coser #202.100

Comments/Reason for not subscribing:

1. Special Education

12-1-1 Special Class


Coser #202.205



12-1-1 Counseling (Individual)


Coser #202.260



12-1-1 Speech/Language (Group)


Coser #203.100



6-1-1 Special Class


Coser #203.120



6-1-1 Hospital Bound Classified


Coser #203.235



6-1-1 Occupational Therapy (Individual)


Coser #203.275



6-1-1 Individual Aide


Coser #203.297



6-1-1 Autism/Behavioral - Parent Training


Coser #204.250



12-1-4 Physical Therapy (Group)


Coser #204.265



12-1-4 Visually Impaired/Mobility (Individual)


Coser #204.265



12-1-4 Autism/Behav. - Consultation/Trainings


Coser #205.225



8-1-1 Hearing Impaired (Individual)


Coser #438.120



Hospital Bound - Non-Classified Students


Coser #515.800



Psychiatric Consultation


Coser #519.800



Augmentative Communication


Coser #101.100


16. Career & Technical Education

Career & Technical Education


Coser #103.110



Special Career Education 12-1-1


Coser #103.120



Special Career Education 8-1-1


CoSer #435.130


19. Education & Information Support Services

Enrichment Program - Reg. Quiz Bowl


Coser #440.120



Enrichment Program - Conference for Kids


Coser #508.100



School Library Automation


Coser #516.100



Library Services/Media


Coser #525.110



Student Assistance Service


Coser #531.200



MY Learning Plan (MLP)


Coser #531.300



Customized Staff Development


Coser #531.315



Curriculum Workshops


Coser #531.400



Educational Leadership, Development & Placement Service


Coser #531.500



NYSED Leader Training for Gr 3-8 Assess.


Coser #531.510



Scoring for NYSED Gr 3-8 & NYSESLAT


Coser #531.560



NYS Alt. Assess. Reg. Test Scoring


Coser #601.040



IEP Direct


Coser #601.060



NYSE Directors


Coser #601.110



e-Rate - Intellipath


Coser #601.340



LAN/WAN Support


Coser #601.410



Election Management Systems


Coser #601.440



Emergency Notification Systems


Coser #601.455



Finance Manager


Coser #601.990



Test Scanning & Reporting


Coser #514.470


39. Regional Information Center

School Data Bank Service - Inclusive Service


Coser #514.530



NYS Required Reporting


Coser #644.110



Intellipath Line Charges


Coser #644.150



Verizon Phone Charges

43. What additional services that are not already offered by the Educational Services Divisionwould be beneficial to your district's needs?

44. Please use this section to make general comments about the Educational Services Division'sprograms, or include any suggestions for improvement.

45. Please indicate the contact information (Name, Title, Email address, and Phone number)for eachperson who completed this survey.

Please rate the quality of the services provided by the Management Services Division by indicating howwell the services met your district's needs during the current service year. If you did not subscribe to aservice that appears on the list below, then it is not necessary to specify a rating for that service. However,we encourage you to comment about why you did not subscribe to the service.

Additionally, at the conclusion of the survey you will find a section where you may include more generalcomments regarding the services provided by the Management Services Division. The information youprovide will better enable the Agency to revise and improve upon the way it serves your district.

1. Management Services Survey

2014-15 ESBOCES CoSer Survey - Management Services - Sample


Coser #417.100


1. Administrative and Business Services

ESBOCES Mobile Safety Bus


Coser #603.110



ESBOCES Special Ed. Transportation


Coser #604.120



Transportation - CTE


Coser #604.130



Transportation - Coach & Field Trips


Coser #607.120



Non Public School Transportation


Coser #609.300



Media/Community Public Relations Consulting Services


Coser #612.110



Cooperative Bidding


Coser #617.100


8. Administrative & Business Services

Employee Assistance Program


Coser #618.120



Health & Safety Basic Service


Coser #623.110



Non-Public Textbook Distribution


Coser #624.110



Bus Driver Drug/Alcohol Testing/Physicals


Coser #624.150



NYSED Advanced Bus Driver Training


Coser #624.170



DMV Driver Abstract Services


Coser #624.200



NYSED Pre-Service Driver Training


Coser #624.210



NYSED Bus Driver Monitor/Attend Basic Training


Coser #624.220



NYSED Pre-Service Mon/Attendance Training


Coser #624.230



NYSED Bus Driver/Monitor Physical Perfm Test


Coser #624.240



DMV 19A Driver Biennial/Annual Test


Coser #624.250



Defensive Driving


Coser #629.120



Transportation - Child Safety Zone


Coser #629.130



Transportation Management - Mapping Services


Coser #633.120



Health Insurance Coordinator - Suffolk


Coser #602.110


23. Human Resources

Negotiations Information Services


Coser #628.110


24. Human Resources

Substitute Service (Level 1)

25. What additional services that are not already offered by the Management Services Divisionwould be beneficial to your district's needs?

26. Please use this section to make general comments about the Management Services Division'sprograms, or include any suggestions for improvement.


Please rate the quality of the services provided through cross-contracts with other BOCES by indicatinghow well the services met your district's needs during the current service year. If you did not subscribe to aservice that appears on the list below, then it is not necessary to specify a rating for that service.

Additionally, at the conclusion of the survey you will find a section where you may include more generalcomments regarding the services provided through the other BOCES. The information you provide willbetter enable the Agency to revise and improve upon the way it serves your district.

1. Supplemental Services Survey

2014-15 ESBOCES CoSer Survey - Supplemental Services - Sample


Coser #260.490


1. Other BOCES Services (Cross-Contract)

Opt. 3 (6-1-1) (Western Suffolk BOCES)


Coser #280.490



Summer Handicapped Special Ed. (Western Suffolk BOCES)


Coser #292.490



CP - Center Opt 4 - Carmen Rd. (Nassau BOCES)


Coser #460.490



Outdoor/Environmental Learning Lab SUNY Stonybrook (Western Suffolk BOCES)


Coser #477.490



Hospital Instruction - (Western Suffolk BOCES)


Coser #489.490



ELAP - Nassau BOCES


Coser #550.490



Staff Development (Western Suffolk BOCES)


Coser #557.490



Vision Itinerant - Nassau BOCES


Coser #565.490



Staff Development (Nassau BOCES)


Coser #570.490



Elementary Science Kits - Monroe #2 BOCES


Coser #590.490



Center for Learning Tech - Western Suffolk BOCES


Coser #598.490



Model Schools -Capital Region


Coser #657.490



Policy Manual (Erie 1 BOCES)


Coser #665.490



State Aid & Financial Planning Service (Questar III BOCES)


Coser #676.490



GASB 45 Financial Impact Analysis (Capital Region BOCES)


Coser #685.490



Long Range Planning - Western Suffolk BOCES


Coser #690.490



Online Application System for Educators (OLAS) (Putnam - N. Westchester BOCES)

18. What additional services that are not already offered through cross-contracting with "OtherBOCES" would be beneficial to your district's needs?

19. Please use this section to make general comments about the "Other BOCES" programs, orinclude any suggestions for improvement.


Please rate the quality of Eastern Suffolk BOCES assistance that is offered by Administrative Staff ratherthan CoSer by indicating how well the assistance has met your district's needs during the current serviceyear. If you did not utilize the assistance of an office that appears on the list below, then it is not necessaryto specify a rating.

Additionally, at the conclusion of the survey you will find a section where you may include more generalcomments regarding other support services and programs. The information you provide will better enablethe Agency to revise and improve upon the way it serves your district.

1. Additional ESBOCES Support Services Survey

2014-15 ESBOCES CoSer Survey - Additional Support Services - Sample


Rating

Comments/Reason for not participating:

1. Additional Support Services

Support from the Office of District Superintendent (D. T. Lucera)


Rating



Support from the Office of Chief Operating Officer (J. Davis Lutz)


Rating



Support from the Office of Educational Services (P. Staib)


Rating



Support from the Office of Management Services (B. Salatto)


Rating



Support from the Department of Human Resources (T. McSweeney)


Rating



Support from the Regional Certification Office


Rating



Support from Bilingual/ESL Technical Assistance Center (BETAC)


Rating



Support from Regional Special Education - Technical Assistance Support Center (RSE-TASC)


Rating



Support from Family Education Outreach Programs (FEOP) (Migrant Programs, Homeless, EvenStart)


Rating



Value of Curriculum Council Participation


Rating



Value of Council of Administrators of Special Education (CASE) Participation


Rating



Value of Council of School Business Officials Participation


Rating



Value of Human Resources Administrators Participation

14. What additional services would be beneficial to your district's needs?

15. Please use this section to make general comments about the services, or include anysuggestions for improvement.


Eastern Suffolk BOCES Board and Administration

President

Lisa Israel

Vice President

Sandra Townsend

Member and Clerk

Fred Langstaff

Members

Walter Wm. Denzler, Jr.

Stephen Dewey, Ph.D.

Stephen L. Gessner, Ph.D. William Hsiang

Theodore J. Imbasciani

Susan Lipman

Joseph LoSchiavo

Anne Mackesey

William K. Miller

Catherine M. Romano

Jeffrey Smith

John Wyche

Interim District Superintendent Chief Operating Officer

Maureen Donohue-Whitley Julie Davis Lutz, Ph.D.

Associate Superintendent

Ryan J. Ruf – Management Services

Associate Superintendent

Peggie Staib, Ed.D. – Educational Services

Assistant Superintendent

R. Terri McSweeney, Ed.D. – Human Resources

Directors/Managers

Keith Anderson – Building Services

Leah Arnold – Career, Technical and Adult Education

Kate Davern – Education and Information Support Services

Colleen Lipponer – Business Services

Susan Maddi – Administrative Services

Grant Nelsen – Technology Integration

Gina Reilly – Special Education

Darlene Roces – Regional Information Center

Candace White-Ciraco, Ed.D. – Planning and Program Improvement

www.esboces.org

Eastern Suffolk BOCES does not discriminate against any employee, student, applicant for employment, or candidate for enrollment on the basis of sex, gender, race, color, religion or creed, age, weight, national origin, marital status, disability, sexual orientation, military or veteran status, domestic violence victim status, genetic predisposition or carrier status, or any other classification protected by Federal, State, or local law. This policy of nondiscrimination includes: access by students to educational programs, student activities, recruitment, appointment and promotion of employees, salaries, pay, and other benefits. Eastern Suffolk BOCES also provides equal access to the Boy Scouts and other designated youth groups. Eastern Suffolk BOCES fully complies with all applicable rules and regulations pertaining to civil rights for students and employees (e.g., Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, §504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Dignity for All Students Act, §303 of Age Discrimination Act of 1975, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Boy Scouts of America Equal Access Act of 2001). Inquiries regarding the implementation of the above laws should be directed to either of the Eastern Suffolk BOCES Civil Rights Compliance Officers: the Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources, 201 Sunrise Highway, Patchogue, NY 11772, 631-687-3029, [email protected]; or the Associate Superintendent for Educational Services, 201 Sunrise Highway, Patchogue, NY 11772, 631-687-3056, [email protected]. Inquiries may also be addressed to the Office for Civil Rights at the US Department of Education, 32 Old Slip, 26th Floor, New York, NY 10005, 646-428-3800, [email protected].

mailto:[email protected]



Documents

Shared Services CoSer Survey Evaluation - … · emailed a series of Eastern Suffolk BOCES Shared Services CoSer surveys for the 2014-15 school year. The surveys were arranged by