27
INFINERGY SHEPHERDS' RIG WIND FARM APPENDIX 21.1 CARBON CALCULATOR RESULTS

SHEPHERDS RIG WIND FARM APPENDIX 21.1 CARBON …shepherdsrigwindfarm.co.uk › files › vol4 appendices...3. Losses due to backup 32,156 27,562 32,156 4. Losses due to reduced carbon

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • INFINERGY

    SHEPHERDS' RIG WIND FARM APPENDIX 21.1

    CARBON CALCULATOR RESULTS

  • Prepared By:

    Arcus Consultancy Services

    7th Floor 144 West George Street

    Glasgow G2 2HG

    T +44 (0)141 221 9997 l E [email protected]

    w www.arcusconsulting.co.uk

    Registered in England & Wales No. 5644976

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Infinergy Arcus Consultancy Services November 2018 Page i

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    PAYBACK TIME AND CO2 EMISSIONS ................................................................................. 1

    PAYBACK TIME CHARTS ....................................................................................................... 2

    INPUT DATA ......................................................................................................................... 4

    1 WINDFARM CO2 EMISSION SAVING ...................................................................... 11

    2 CO2 LOSS DUE TO TURBINE LIFE ............................................................................ 12

    3 CO2 LOSS DUE TO BACKUP ..................................................................................... 13

    4 LOSS OF CO2 FIXING POTENTIAL ........................................................................... 14

    5 LOSS OF SOIL CO2 (A,B) ......................................................................................... 15

    6 CO2 LOSS BY DOC & POC LOSS ............................................................................... 18

    7 FORESTRY CO2 LOSS ............................................................................................... 19

    8 CO2 GAIN – SITE IMPROVEMENT ........................................................................... 20

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Infinergy Arcus Consultancy Services November 2018 Page 1

    PAYBACK TIME AND CO2 EMISSIONS

    1. Windfarm CO2 emissions saving over… Exp Min. Max.

    …coal-fired electricity generation (t CO2 / yr) 163,640 124,862 187,384

    ….grid-mix of electricity generation (t CO2 / yr) 50,069 38,204 57,334

    ….fossil fuel-mix of electricity generation (t CO2 yr) 81,998 62,567 93,896

    Energy output from windfarm over lifetime (MWh) 4,456,431 3,400,369 5,103,050

    Total CO2 losses due to wind farm (TCO2 eq.) Exp. Min. Max.

    2. Losses due to turbine life (e.g. manufacture, construction, decomissioning) 69,175 58,523 69,175

    3. Losses due to backup 32,156 27,562 32,156

    4. Losses due to reduced carbon fixing potential 689 146 1,486

    5. Losses from soil organic matter 9,565 -2,581 170,247

    6. Losses due to DOC & POC leaching 0 0 1

    7. Losses due to felling forestry 0 0 0

    Total losses of carbon dioxide 111,585 83,650 273,065

    8. Total CO2 gains due to improvement of site (t CO2 eq.) Exp. Min. Max.

    8a. Change in emissions due to improvement of degraded bogs 0 0 0

    8b. Change in emissions due to improvement of felled forestry 0 0 0

    8c. Change in emissions due to restoration of peat from borrow pits -105 0 -161

    8d. Change in emissions due to removal of drainage from foundations & hardstanding -580 0 -1,910

    Total change in emissions due to improvements -685 0 -2,072

    RESULTS Exp. Min. Max.

    Net emissions of carbon dioxide (t CO2 eq.) 110,900 81,578 273,065

    Carbon Payback Time

    ...coal-fired electricity generation (years) 0.7 0.4 2.2

    ...grid-mix of electricity generation (years) 2.2 1.4 7.1

    ...fossil fuel-mix of electricity generation (years) 1.4 0.9 4.4

    Ratio of soil carbon loss to gain by restoration (not used in Scottish applications) 13.97 -1.25 No gains!

    Ratio of CO2 eq. emissions to power generation (g/kWh) (for info. only) 24.89 15.99 80.3

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Arcus Consultancy Services Infinergy Page 2 November 2018

    PAYBACK TIME CHARTS

  • Gre

    enho

    use

    gas

    emis

    sion

    s (t

    CO

    2 eq

    .)

    Sou

    rces

    Pro

    porti

    ons

    of g

    reen

    hous

    e ga

    s em

    issi

    ons

    from

    diff

    eren

    t sou

    rces

    Sou

    rces

    Turb

    ine

    life

    Back

    up

    Bog

    plan

    ts

    Soil

    orga

    nic

    carb

    on

    DOC

    & P

    OC

    Man

    agem

    ent o

    f for

    estr

    y

    Impr

    oved

    deg

    rade

    d bo

    gs

    Impr

    oved

    felle

    d fo

    rest

    ry

    Rest

    ored

    bor

    row

    pits

    Stop

    dra

    inag

    e of

    foun

    da�o

    ns

    Pay

    back

    Tim

    eP

    ayba

    ckTi

    me

    -Cha

    rtsIn

    putD

    ata

    Car

    bon

    payb

    ack

    time

    (mon

    ths)

    usi

    ng fo

    ssil-

    fuel

    mix

    as

    cont

    erfa

    ctua

    l

    Pay

    back

    Tim

    e - C

    harts

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Arcus Consultancy Services Infinergy Page 4 November 2018

    INPUT DATA

  • 1/6

    Carb

    on C

    alcu

    lato

    r v1

    .5.0

    Shep

    herd

    's R

    ig W

    ind

    Farm

    Loca

    tion:

    55.2

    1729

    8-4

    .165

    693

    In�n

    ergy

    Core

    inpu

    t da

    ta

    Inpu

    t da

    taEx

    pect

    ed v

    alue

    Min

    imum

    val

    ueM

    axim

    umva

    lue

    Sour

    ce o

    f dat

    a

    Win

    dfar

    m c

    hara

    cter

    istic

    sD

    imen

    sion

    sN

    o. o

    f tur

    bine

    s19

    1919

    Sect

    ion

    4.2

    Dur

    atio

    n of

    con

    sent

    (yea

    rs)

    2525

    25Se

    ctio

    n 4.

    7.1

    Perf

    orm

    ance

    Pow

    er r

    atin

    g of

    1 tu

    rbin

    e (M

    W)

    4.2

    3.6

    4.2

    Sect

    ion

    4.3.

    5Ca

    paci

    ty fa

    ctor

    25.5

    22.7

    29.2

    Calc

    ulat

    ed fr

    om a

    vera

    ge.

    Back

    upFr

    actio

    n of

    out

    put t

    o ba

    ckup

    (%)

    44

    4se

    ctio

    n 4.

    1.4

    Addi

    tiona

    l em

    issi

    ons

    due

    to r

    educ

    ed th

    erm

    al e

    �ci

    ency

    of t

    he r

    eser

    vege

    nera

    tion

    (%)

    1010

    10Fi

    xed

    Tota

    l CO

    2 em

    issi

    on fr

    om tu

    rbin

    e lif

    e (tC

    O2

    MW

    -1) (

    eg. m

    anuf

    actu

    re,

    cons

    truc

    tion,

    dec

    omm

    issi

    onin

    g)

    Calc

    ulat

    e w

    rtin

    stal

    led

    capa

    city

    Calc

    ulat

    e w

    rtin

    stal

    led

    capa

    city

    Calc

    ulat

    e w

    rtin

    stal

    led

    capa

    city

    Char

    acte

    rist

    ics

    of p

    eatla

    nd b

    efor

    e w

    indf

    arm

    dev

    elop

    men

    tTy

    pe o

    f pea

    tland

    Acid

    bog

    Acid

    bog

    Acid

    bog

    Peat

    Slid

    e Ri

    sk A

    sses

    smen

    t Tec

    hnic

    al A

    ppen

    dix

    Aver

    age

    annu

    al a

    ir te

    mpe

    ratu

    re a

    t site

    (°C)

    6.5

    310

    Calc

    ulat

    ed fr

    om c

    limat

    e av

    erag

    es fo

    r ar

    ea.

    Aver

    age

    dept

    h of

    pea

    t at s

    ite (m

    )0.

    50

    4.5

    Peat

    Slid

    e Ri

    sk A

    sses

    smen

    t Tec

    hnic

    al A

    ppen

    dix

    C Co

    nten

    t of d

    ry p

    eat (

    % b

    y w

    eigh

    t)53

    .23

    19.5

    753

    .24

    Scot

    tish

    Gov

    ernm

    ent G

    uida

    nce

    - Gui

    danc

    e on

    Dev

    elop

    men

    ts o

    n Pe

    atla

    nd -

    Site

    Sur

    veys

    Aver

    age

    exte

    nt o

    f dra

    inag

    e ar

    ound

    dra

    inag

    e fe

    atur

    es a

    t site

    (m)

    51

    10Te

    chni

    cal e

    stim

    atio

    n - f

    urth

    er r

    e�ne

    d af

    ter

    drai

    nage

    inst

    alle

    d.Av

    erag

    e w

    ater

    tabl

    e de

    pth

    at s

    ite (m

    )0.

    50.

    40.

    6Te

    chni

    cal e

    stim

    atio

    n.

    Dry

    soi

    l bul

    k de

    nsity

    (g c

    m-3

    )0.

    132

    0.07

    20.

    293

    Scot

    tish

    Gov

    ernm

    ent G

    uida

    nce

    - Gui

    danc

    e on

    Dev

    elop

    men

    ts o

    n Pe

    atla

    nd -

    Site

    Sur

    veys

    Char

    acte

    rist

    ics

    of b

    og p

    lant

    sTi

    me

    requ

    ired

    for

    rege

    nera

    tion

    of b

    og p

    lant

    s af

    ter

    rest

    orat

    ion

    (yea

    rs)

    22

    2N

    ot a

    pplic

    able

    to P

    ropo

    sed

    Dev

    elop

    men

    tCa

    rbon

    acc

    umul

    atio

    n du

    e to

    C �

    xatio

    n by

    bog

    pla

    nts

    in u

    ndra

    ined

    peat

    s (tC

    ha-

    1 yr

    -1)

    0.25

    0.12

    0.31

    SNH

    Gui

    danc

    e -C

    arbo

    n Pa

    ybac

    k Ca

    lcul

    ator

    :G

    uide

    lines

    on

    Mea

    sure

    men

    ts

    Fore

    stry

    Pla

    ntat

    ion

    Char

    acte

    rist

    ics

    Area

    of f

    ores

    try

    plan

    tatio

    n to

    be

    felle

    d (h

    a)0

    00

    Sect

    ion

    7.9.

    4

    Aver

    age

    rate

    of c

    arbo

    n se

    ques

    trat

    ion

    in ti

    mbe

    r (tC

    ha-

    1 yr

    -1)

    3.6

    2.5

    4.7

    Scot

    tish

    Gov

    ernm

    ent a

    nd S

    NH

    Gui

    danc

    e

  • 2/6

    Inpu

    t da

    taEx

    pect

    ed v

    alue

    Min

    imum

    val

    ueM

    axim

    umva

    lue

    Sour

    ce o

    f dat

    a

    Coun

    terf

    actu

    al e

    mis

    sion

    fact

    ors

    Coal

    -�re

    d pl

    ant e

    mis

    sion

    fact

    or (t

    CO

    2 M

    Wh-

    1 )0.

    918

    0.91

    80.

    918

    Gri

    d-m

    ix e

    mis

    sion

    fact

    or (t

    CO

    2 M

    Wh-

    1 )0.

    2808

    80.

    2808

    80.

    2808

    8

    Foss

    il fu

    el-m

    ix e

    mis

    sion

    fact

    or (t

    CO

    2 M

    Wh-

    1 )0.

    460.

    460.

    46

    Borr

    ow p

    itsN

    umbe

    r of

    bor

    row

    pits

    22

    2Bo

    rrow

    Pit

    Asse

    ssm

    ent T

    echn

    ical

    App

    endi

    xAv

    erag

    e le

    ngth

    of p

    its (m

    )13

    512

    514

    5Bo

    rrow

    Pit

    Asse

    ssm

    ent T

    echn

    ical

    App

    endi

    xAv

    erag

    e w

    idth

    of p

    its (m

    )72

    .560

    85Bo

    rrow

    Pit

    Asse

    ssm

    ent T

    echn

    ical

    App

    endi

    xAv

    erag

    e de

    pth

    of p

    eat r

    emov

    ed fr

    om p

    it (m

    )0.

    50.

    54.

    5Pe

    at S

    lide

    Risk

    Ass

    essm

    ent T

    echn

    ical

    App

    endi

    xFo

    unda

    tions

    and

    har

    d-st

    andi

    ng a

    rea

    asso

    ciat

    ed w

    ith e

    ach

    turb

    ine

    Aver

    age

    leng

    th o

    f tur

    bine

    foun

    datio

    ns (m

    )20

    .820

    .820

    .8Fi

    gure

    4.3

    Aver

    age

    wid

    th o

    f tur

    bine

    foun

    datio

    ns (m

    )20

    .820

    .820

    .8Fi

    gure

    4.3

    Aver

    age

    dept

    h of

    pea

    t rem

    oved

    from

    turb

    ine

    foun

    datio

    ns(m

    )1

    11

    Peat

    Slid

    e Ri

    sk A

    naly

    sis

    Tech

    nica

    l App

    endi

    xAv

    erag

    e le

    ngth

    of h

    ard-

    stan

    ding

    (m)

    62.5

    62.5

    62.5

    Figu

    re 4

    .4Av

    erag

    e w

    idth

    of h

    ard-

    stan

    ding

    (m)

    2525

    25Fi

    gure

    4.4

    Aver

    age

    dept

    h of

    pea

    t rem

    oved

    from

    har

    d-st

    andi

    ng (m

    )0.

    50

    4.5

    Peat

    Slid

    e Ri

    sk A

    naly

    sis

    Tech

    nica

    l App

    endi

    xVo

    lum

    e of

    con

    cret

    e us

    ed in

    con

    stru

    ctio

    n of

    the

    ENTI

    RE w

    indf

    arm

    Volu

    me

    of c

    oncr

    ete

    (m3 )

    1106

    611

    066

    1106

    6Se

    ctio

    n 4.

    3.68

    Acce

    ss tr

    acks

    Tota

    l len

    gth

    of a

    cces

    s tr

    ack

    (m)

    1100

    010

    000

    1200

    0Se

    ctio

    n 4.

    3.24

    Exis

    ting

    trac

    k le

    ngth

    (m)

    3000

    3000

    3000

    Calc

    ulat

    ed fr

    om C

    AD d

    raw

    ings

    .Le

    ngth

    of a

    cces

    s tr

    ack

    that

    is �

    oatin

    g ro

    ad (m

    )0

    00

    No

    appl

    icab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

    Floa

    ting

    road

    wid

    th (m

    )5

    57

    No

    appl

    icab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

    Floa

    ting

    road

    dep

    th (m

    )0

    00

    No

    appl

    icab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

    Leng

    th o

    f �oa

    ting

    road

    that

    is d

    rain

    ed (m

    )0

    00

    No

    appl

    icab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

    Aver

    age

    dept

    h of

    dra

    ins

    asso

    ciat

    ed w

    ith �

    oatin

    g ro

    ads

    (m)

    00

    0N

    o ap

    plic

    able

    to P

    ropo

    sed

    Dev

    elop

    men

    tLe

    ngth

    of a

    cces

    s tr

    ack

    that

    is e

    xcav

    ated

    roa

    d (m

    )40

    0035

    0045

    00Se

    ctio

    n 4.

    3.24

    Exca

    vate

    d ro

    ad w

    idth

    (m)

    55

    5Se

    ctio

    n 4.

    3.24

    and

    follo

    win

    g se

    ctio

    nsAv

    erag

    e de

    pth

    of p

    eat e

    xcav

    ated

    for

    road

    (m)

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    Peat

    Slid

    e Ri

    sk A

    naly

    sis

    Tech

    nica

    l App

    endi

    xLe

    ngth

    of a

    cces

    s tr

    ack

    that

    is r

    ock

    �lle

    d ro

    ad (m

    )40

    0035

    0045

    00Se

    ctio

    n 4.

    3.24

    Rock

    �lle

    d ro

    ad w

    idth

    (m)

    55

    5Se

    ctio

    n 4.

    3.27

    Rock

    �lle

    d ro

    ad d

    epth

    (m)

    0.6

    0.5

    0.7

    Tabl

    e 4.

    2Le

    ngth

    of r

    ock

    �lle

    d ro

    ad th

    at is

    dra

    ined

    (m)

    1100

    010

    999

    1100

    1Se

    ctio

    n 4.

    3.24

    Aver

    age

    dept

    h of

    dra

    ins

    asso

    ciat

    ed w

    ith r

    ock

    �lle

    d ro

    ads

    (m)

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    Chap

    ter

    4Ca

    ble

    tren

    ches

    Leng

    th o

    f any

    cab

    le tr

    ench

    on

    peat

    that

    doe

    s no

    t fol

    low

    acc

    ess

    trac

    ksan

    d is

    line

    d w

    ith a

    per

    mea

    ble

    med

    ium

    (eg.

    san

    d) (m

    )0

    00

    No

    appl

    icab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

  • 3/6

    Inpu

    t da

    taEx

    pect

    ed v

    alue

    Min

    imum

    val

    ueM

    axim

    umva

    lue

    Sour

    ce o

    f dat

    a

    Aver

    age

    dept

    h of

    pea

    t cut

    for

    cabl

    e tr

    ench

    es (m

    )0.

    50

    4.5

    Peat

    Slid

    e Ri

    sk A

    sses

    smen

    t Tec

    hnic

    al A

    ppen

    dix

    Addi

    tiona

    l pea

    t exc

    avat

    ed (n

    ot a

    lrea

    dy a

    ccou

    nted

    for

    abov

    e)

    Volu

    me

    of a

    dditi

    onal

    pea

    t exc

    avat

    ed (m

    3 )0

    00

    No

    appl

    icab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

    Area

    of a

    dditi

    onal

    pea

    t exc

    avat

    ed (m

    2 )0

    00

    No

    appl

    icab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

    Peat

    Lan

    dslid

    e H

    azar

    dPe

    at L

    ands

    lide

    Haz

    ard

    and

    Risk

    Ass

    essm

    ents

    : Bes

    t Pra

    ctic

    e G

    uide

    for

    Prop

    osed

    Ele

    ctri

    city

    Gen

    erat

    ion

    Dev

    elop

    men

    tsne

    glig

    ible

    negl

    igib

    lene

    glig

    ible

    Fixe

    d

    Impr

    ovem

    ent o

    f C s

    eque

    stra

    tion

    at s

    ite b

    y bl

    ocki

    ng d

    rain

    s, r

    esto

    ratio

    n of

    hab

    itat e

    tcIm

    prov

    emen

    t of d

    egra

    ded

    bog

    Area

    of d

    egra

    ded

    bog

    to b

    e im

    prov

    ed (h

    a)0

    00

    Not

    app

    licab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

    Wat

    er ta

    ble

    dept

    h in

    deg

    rade

    d bo

    g be

    fore

    impr

    ovem

    ent (

    m)

    00

    0N

    ot a

    pplic

    able

    to P

    ropo

    sed

    Dev

    elop

    men

    tW

    ater

    tabl

    e de

    pth

    in d

    egra

    ded

    bog

    afte

    r im

    prov

    emen

    t (m

    )0

    00

    Not

    app

    licab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

    Tim

    e re

    quir

    ed fo

    r hy

    drol

    ogy

    and

    habi

    tat o

    f bog

    to r

    etur

    n to

    its

    prev

    ious

    sta

    te o

    n im

    prov

    emen

    t (ye

    ars)

    22

    2N

    ot a

    pplic

    able

    to P

    ropo

    sed

    Dev

    elop

    men

    t

    Peri

    od o

    f tim

    e w

    hen

    e�ec

    tiven

    ess

    of th

    e im

    prov

    emen

    t in

    degr

    aded

    bog

    can

    be g

    uara

    ntee

    d (y

    ears

    )2

    22

    Not

    app

    licab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

    Impr

    ovem

    ent o

    f fel

    led

    plan

    tatio

    n la

    ndAr

    ea o

    f fel

    led

    plan

    tatio

    n to

    be

    impr

    oved

    (ha)

    00

    0N

    ot a

    pplic

    able

    to P

    ropo

    sed

    Dev

    elop

    men

    tW

    ater

    tabl

    e de

    pth

    in fe

    lled

    area

    bef

    ore

    impr

    ovem

    ent (

    m)

    0.5

    0.4

    0.6

    Not

    app

    licab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

    Wat

    er ta

    ble

    dept

    h in

    felle

    d ar

    ea a

    fter

    impr

    ovem

    ent (

    m)

    0.45

    0.3

    0.55

    Not

    app

    licab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

    Tim

    e re

    quir

    ed fo

    r hy

    drol

    ogy

    and

    habi

    tat o

    f fel

    led

    plan

    tatio

    n to

    ret

    urn

    to it

    s pr

    evio

    us s

    tate

    on

    impr

    ovem

    ent (

    year

    s)2

    22

    Not

    app

    licab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

    Peri

    od o

    f tim

    e w

    hen

    e�ec

    tiven

    ess

    of th

    e im

    prov

    emen

    t in

    felle

    dpl

    anta

    tion

    can

    be g

    uara

    ntee

    d (y

    ears

    )2

    22

    Not

    app

    licab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

    Rest

    orat

    ion

    of p

    eat r

    emov

    ed fr

    om b

    orro

    w p

    itsAr

    ea o

    f bor

    row

    pits

    to b

    e re

    stor

    ed (h

    a)2.

    22.

    22.

    2Bo

    rrow

    Pit

    Asse

    ssm

    ent T

    echn

    ical

    App

    endi

    xD

    epth

    of w

    ater

    tabl

    e in

    bor

    row

    pit

    befo

    re r

    esto

    ratio

    n w

    ith r

    espe

    ct to

    the

    rest

    ored

    sur

    face

    (m)

    0.5

    0.4

    0.6

    Tech

    nica

    l ave

    rage

    use

    d.

    Dep

    th o

    f wat

    er ta

    ble

    in b

    orro

    w p

    it af

    ter

    rest

    orat

    ion

    with

    res

    pect

    toth

    e re

    stor

    ed s

    urfa

    ce (m

    )0.

    450.

    30.

    55Te

    chni

    cal e

    stim

    atio

    n - r

    e�ne

    d w

    hen

    rest

    orat

    ion

    take

    n pl

    ace.

    Tim

    e re

    quir

    ed fo

    r hy

    drol

    ogy

    and

    habi

    tat o

    f bor

    row

    pit

    to r

    etur

    n to

    its

    prev

    ious

    sta

    te o

    n re

    stor

    atio

    n (y

    ears

    )5

    55

    Tech

    nica

    l ave

    rage

    use

    d.

    Peri

    od o

    f tim

    e w

    hen

    e�ec

    tiven

    ess

    of th

    e re

    stor

    atio

    n of

    pea

    t rem

    oved

    from

    bor

    row

    pits

    can

    be

    guar

    ante

    ed (y

    ears

    )10

    1010

    Tech

    nica

    l ave

    rage

    use

    d.

    Earl

    y re

    mov

    al o

    f dra

    inag

    e fr

    om fo

    unda

    tions

    and

    har

    dsta

    ndin

    gW

    ater

    tabl

    e de

    pth

    arou

    nd fo

    unda

    tions

    and

    har

    dsta

    ndin

    g be

    fore

    rest

    orat

    ion

    (m)

    0.5

    0.4

    0.6

    Tech

    nica

    l ave

    rage

    use

    d.

  • 4/6

    Inpu

    t da

    taEx

    pect

    ed v

    alue

    Min

    imum

    val

    ueM

    axim

    umva

    lue

    Sour

    ce o

    f dat

    a

    Wat

    er ta

    ble

    dept

    h ar

    ound

    foun

    datio

    ns a

    nd h

    ards

    tand

    ing

    afte

    rre

    stor

    atio

    n (m

    )0.

    450.

    30.

    55Te

    chni

    cal e

    stim

    atio

    n - r

    e�ne

    d on

    ce r

    esto

    ratio

    nta

    ken

    plac

    e.Ti

    me

    to c

    ompl

    etio

    n of

    bac

    k�lli

    ng, r

    emov

    al o

    f any

    sur

    face

    dra

    ins,

    and

    full

    rest

    orat

    ion

    of th

    e hy

    drol

    ogy

    (yea

    rs)

    22

    2Te

    chni

    cal e

    stim

    atio

    n - r

    e�ne

    d on

    ce r

    esto

    ratio

    nta

    ken

    plac

    e.Re

    stor

    atio

    n of

    site

    aft

    er d

    ecom

    issi

    onin

    gW

    ill th

    e hy

    drol

    ogy

    of th

    e si

    te b

    e re

    stor

    ed o

    n de

    com

    mis

    sion

    ing?

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    Will

    you

    att

    empt

    to b

    lock

    any

    gul

    lies

    that

    hav

    e fo

    rmed

    due

    to th

    ew

    indf

    arm

    ?Ye

    sYe

    sYe

    sW

    orst

    cas

    e sc

    enar

    io u

    sed.

    Will

    you

    att

    empt

    to b

    lock

    all

    arti�

    cial

    ditc

    hes

    and

    faci

    litat

    e re

    wet

    ting?

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    Wor

    st c

    ase

    scen

    ario

    use

    d.W

    ill th

    e ha

    bita

    t of t

    he s

    ite b

    e re

    stor

    ed o

    n de

    com

    mis

    sion

    ing?

    No

    No

    No

    Will

    you

    con

    trol

    gra

    zing

    on

    degr

    aded

    are

    as?

    n/a

    n/a

    n/a

    Not

    app

    licab

    le to

    Pro

    pose

    d D

    evel

    opm

    ent

    Will

    you

    man

    age

    area

    s to

    favo

    ur r

    eint

    rodu

    ctio

    n of

    spe

    cies

    No

    No

    No

    Expe

    cted

    con

    tinua

    l use

    as

    com

    mer

    cial

    fore

    stry

    .M

    etho

    dolo

    gyCh

    oice

    of m

    etho

    dolo

    gy fo

    r ca

    lcul

    atin

    g em

    issi

    on fa

    ctor

    sSi

    te s

    peci

    �c (r

    equi

    red

    for

    plan

    ning

    app

    licat

    ions

    )

  • 5/6

    Fore

    stry

    inpu

    t da

    ta

    N/A

  • 6/6

    Cons

    truc

    tion

    inpu

    t da

    ta

    N/A

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Infinergy Arcus Consultancy Services November 2018 Page 11

    1 WINDFARM CO2 EMISSION SAVING

    Capacity Factor Direct Input Exp. Min. Max.

    Capacity factor (%) 25.5 22.7 29.2

    Exp. Min. Max.

    Annual energy output from windfarm (MW/yr)

    RESULTS

    Emissions saving over coal-fired electricity generation (tCO2/yr) 163,640 124,862 187,384

    Emissions saving over grid-mix of electricity generation (tCO2/yr) 50,069 38,204 57,334

    Emissions saving over fossil fuel - mix of electricity generation (tCO2/yr) 81,998 62,567 93,896

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Arcus Consultancy Services Infinergy Page 12 November 2018

    2 CO2 LOSS DUE TO TURBINE LIFE

    Calculation of emisssions with relation to installed capacity Exp. Min. Max.

    Emissions due to turbine frome energy output (t CO2) 3457 2896 3457

    Emissions due to cement used in construction (t CO2) 3497 3497 3497

    RESULTS Exp. Min. Max.

    Losses due to turbine life (manufacture, construction, etc.) (t CO2) 69175 58523 69175

    Additional CO2 payback time of windfarm due to turbine life

    ...coal-fired electricity generation (months) 5 6 4

    ...grid-mix of electricity generation (months) 17 18 14

    ...fossil fuel - mix of electricity generation (months) 10 11 9

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Infinergy Arcus Consultancy Services November 2018 Page 13

    3 CO2 LOSS DUE TO BACKUP

    Exp. Min. Max.

    Reserve energy (MWh/yr) 27,962 23,967 27,962

    Annual emissions due to backup from fossil fuel-mix of electricity generation (tCO2/yr) 1,286 1,102 1,286

    RESULTS

    Total emissions due to backup from fossil fuel-mix of electricity generation (tCO2) 32,156 27,562 32,156

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Arcus Consultancy Services Infinergy Page 14 November 2018

    4 LOSS OF CO2 FIXING POTENTIAL

    Exp. Min. Max.

    Area where carbon accumulation by bog plants is lost (ha) 27.83 12.26 48.42

    Total loss of carbon accumulation up to time of restoration (tCO2 eq./ha) 25 12 31

    RESULTS

    Total loss of carbon fixation by plants at the site (t CO2) 689 146 1486

    Additional CO2 payback time of windfarm due to loss of CO2 fixing potential

    ...coal-fired electricity generation (months) 0 0 0

    ...grid-mix of electricity generation (months) 0 0 0

    ...fossil fuel - mix of electricity generation (months) 0 0 0

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Infinergy Arcus Consultancy Services November 2018 Page 15

    5 LOSS OF SOIL CO2 (A,B)

    5. Loss of Soil (CO2) Exp. Min. Max.

    CO2 loss from removed peat (t CO2 equiv.) 9565.41 -2581.2 154689

    CO2 loss from drained peat (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 15557.6

    RESULTS

    Total CO2 loss from peat (removed + drained) (t CO2 equiv.) 9565.41 -2581.2 170247

    Additional CO2 payback time of windfarm due to loss of soil CO2

    ...coal-fired electricity generation (months) 0.7 -0.25 10.9

    ...grid-mix of electricity generation (months) 2.29 -0.81 35.63

    ...fossil fuel - mix of electricity generation (months) 1.4 -0.5 21.76

    5a. Volume of Peat Removed Exp. Min. Max.

    Peat removed from borrow pits

    Area of land lost in borrow pits (m2) 19575 15000 24650

    Volume of peat removed from borrow pits (m3) 9787.5 7500 110925

    Peat removed from turbine foundations

    Area of land lost in foundation (m2) 8220.16 8220.16 8220.16

    Volume of peat removed from foundation area (m3) 8220.16 8220.16 8220.16

    Peat removed from hard-standing

    Area of land lost in hard-standing (m2) 29687.5 29687.5 29687.5

    Volume of peat removed from hard-standing area (m3) 14843.8 0 133594

    Peat removed from access tracks

    Area of land lost in floating roads (m2) 0 0 0

    Volume of peat removed from floating roads (m3) 0 0 0

    Area of land lost in excavated roads (m2) 20000 17500 22500

    Volume of peat removed from excavated roads (m3) 10000 8750 11250

    Area of land lost in rock-filled roads (m2) 20000 17500 22500

    Volume of peat removed from rock-filled roads (m3) 12000 8750 15750

    Total area of land lost in access tracks (m2) 40000 35000 45000

    Total volume of peat removed due to access tracks (m3) 22000 17500 27000

    RESULTS

    Total area of land lost due to windfarm construction (m2) 97482.7 87907.7 107558

    Total volume of peat removed due to windfarm construction (m3) 54851.4 33220.2 279739

    5b. CO2 Loss from Removed Peat Exp. Min. Max.

    CO2 loss from removed peat (t CO2) 14131.7 1716.33 160005

    CO2 loss from undrained peat left in situ (t CO2) 4566.27 4297.5 5315.81

    RESULTS

    CO2 loss atributable to peat removal only (t CO2) 9565.41 -2581.2 154689

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Arcus Consultancy Services Infinergy Page 16 November 2018

    5c. Volume of Peat Drained Exp. Min. Max.

    Total area affected by drainage around borrow pits (m2) 4350 748 10000

    Total volume affected by drainage around borrow pits (m3) 1087.5 187 22500

    Peat affected by drainage around turbine foundation and hardstanding

    Total area affected by drainage of foundation and hardstanding area (m2) 26429 4981.8 56658

    Total volume affected by drainage of foundation and hardstanding area (m3) 13214.5 2490.9 127481

    Peat affected by drainage of access tracks

    Total area affected by drainage of access track(m2) 150000 28998 310020

    Total volume affected by drainage of access track(m3) 37500 7249.5 77505

    Peat affected by drainage of cable trenches

    Total area affected by drainage of cable trenches(m2) 0 0 0

    Total volume affected by drainage of cable trneches(m3) 0 0 0

    Drainage around additional peat excavated

    Total area affected by drainage (m2) 0 0 0

    Total volume affected by drainage (m3) 0 0 0

    RESULTS

    Total area affected by drainage due to windfarm (m2) 180779 34727.8 376678

    Total volume affected by drainage due to windfarm (m3) 51802 9927.4 227486

    5d. CO2 Loss from Drained Peat Exp. Min. Max.

    Calculations of C Loss from Drained Land if Site is NOT Restored after Decomissioning

    Total GHG emissions from Drained Land (t CO2 equiv.) 13346 512.9 130117

    Total GHG emissions from Undrained Land (t CO2 equiv.) 13346 512.9 114560

    Calculations of C Loss from Drained Land if Site IS Restored after Decomissioning

    Losses if Land is Drained

    CH4 emissions from drained land (t CO2 equiv.) -189.89 -74.13 -34

    CO2 emissions from drained land (t CO2) 8657.91 1771.85 21178.7

    Total GHG emissions from Drained Land (t CO2 equiv.) 13346 512.9 130117

    Losses if Land is Undrained

    CH4 emissions from undrained land (t CO2 equiv.) -189.89 -74.13 16.22

    CO2 emissions from undrained land (t CO2) 8657.91 1771.85 18600.3

    Total GHG emissions from Undrained Land (t CO2 equiv.) 13346 512.9 114560

    RESULTS

    Total GHG emissions due to drainage (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 15557.6

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Infinergy Arcus Consultancy Services November 2018 Page 17

    5e. Emissions Rates from Soil Exp. Min. Max.

    Calculations following IPCC default methodology

    Flooded period (days/year) 178 178 178

    Annual rate of methane emission (t CH4-C/ha year) 0.04 0.04 0.04

    Annual rate of carbon dioxide emission (t CO2/ha year) 35.2 35.2 35.2

    Calculations following ECOSSE based methodology

    Total area affected by drainage due to wind farm construction (ha) 18.08 3.47 37.67

    Average water table depth of drained land (m) 0.5 0.6 0.6

    Selected emission characteristics following site specific methodology

    Rate of carbon dioxide emission in drained soil (t CO2/ha year) 17.74 18.9 20.82

    Rate of carbon dioxide emission in undrained soil (t CO2/ha year) 17.74 18.9 15.63

    Rate of methane emission in drained soil (t CH4-C/ha year) -0.01 -0.03 0

    Rate of methane emission in undrained soil (t CH4-C/ha year) -0.01 -0.03 0

    RESULTS

    Selected rate of carbon dioxide emission in drained soil (t CO2/ha year) 17.74 18.9 20.82

    Selected rate of carbon dioxide emission in undrained soil (t CO2/ha year) 17.74 18.9 15.63

    Selected rate of methane emission in drained soil (t CH4-C/ha year) -0.01 -0.03 0

    Selected rate of methane emission in undrained soil (t CH4-C/ha year) -0.01 -0.03 0

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Arcus Consultancy Services Infinergy Page 18 November 2018

    6 CO2 LOSS BY DOC & POC LOSS

    Exp. Min. Max.

    Gross CO2 loss from restored drained land (t CO2) 0 0 0

    Gross CH4 loss from restored drained land (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 0

    Gross CO2 loss from improved land (t CO2) 0 0 0

    Gross CH4 loss from improved land (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 23.16

    Total gaseous loss of C (t C) 0 0 0.57

    Total C loss as DOC (t C) 0 0 0.23

    Total C loss as POC (t C) 0 0 0.06

    RESULTS

    Total CO2 loss due to DOC leaching (t CO2) 0 0 0.83

    Total CO2 loss due to POC leaching (t CO2) 0 0 0.21

    Total CO2 loss due to DOC & POC leaching (t CO2) 0 0 1.04

    Additional CO2 payback time of windfarm due to DOC & POC

    ...coal-fired electricity generation (months) 0 0 0

    ...grid-mix of electricity generation (months) 0 0 0

    ...fossil fuel - mix of electricity generation (months) 0 0 0

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Infinergy Arcus Consultancy Services November 2018 Page 19

    7 FORESTRY CO2 LOSS

    Exp. Min. Max.

    Area of forestry plantation to be felled (ha) 0 0 0

    Carbon sequestered (t C ha-1 yr-1) 3.6 2.5 4.7

    Lifetime of windfarm (years) 25 25 25

    Carbon sequestered over the lifetime of the windfarm (t C ha-1) 90 62.5 117.5

    RESULTS

    Total carbon loss due to felling of forestry (t CO2) 0 0 0

    Additional CO2 payback time of windfarm due to management of forestry

    ...coal-fired electricity generation (months) 0 0 0

    ...grid-mix of electricity generation (months) 0 0 0

    ...fossil fuel - mix of electricity generation (months) 0 0 0

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Arcus Consultancy Services Infinergy Page 20 November 2018

    8 CO2 GAIN – SITE IMPROVEMENT

    Degraded Bog Exp. Min. Max.

    1. Description of site

    Area to be improved (ha) 0 0 0

    Depth of peat above water table before improvement (m) 0 0 0

    Depth of peat above water table after improvement (m) 0 0 0

    2. Losses with improvement

    Improved period (years) 0 0 0

    Selected annual rate of methane emissions (t CH4-C ha-1 yr-1) 0.486 0.474 0.499

    CH4 emissions from improved land (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 0

    Selected annual rate of carbone dioxide emissions (t CO2 ha-1 yr-1) -0.396 -1.327 0.535

    CO2 emissions from improved land (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 0

    Total GHG emissions from improved land (t CO2 eqiv.) 0 0 0

    3. Losses without improvement

    Improved period (years) 0 0 0

    Selected annual rate of methane emissions (t CH4-C ha-1 yr-1) 0.486 0.474 0.499

    CH4 emissions from improved land (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 0

    Selected annual rate of carbone dioxide emissions (t CO2 ha-1 yr-1) -0.396 -1.327 0.535

    CO2 emissions from unimproved land (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 0

    Total GHG emissions from unimproved land (t CO2 eqiv.) 0 0 0

    RESULTS

    4. Reduction in GHG emissions due to improvement of site

    Reduction in GHG emissions due to improvement (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 0

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Infinergy Arcus Consultancy Services November 2018 Page 21

    Felled Forestry Exp. Min. Max.

    1. Description of site

    Area to be improved (ha) 0 0 0

    Depth of peat above water table before improvement (m) 0.5 0 0.6

    Depth of peat above water table after improvement (m) 0.45 0 0.3

    2. Losses with improvement

    Improved period (years) 0 0 0

    Selected annual rate of methane emissions (t CH4-C ha-1 yr-1) -0.012 0.474 0.011

    CH4 emissions from improved land (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 0

    Selected annual rate of carbone dioxide emissions (t CO2 ha-1 yr-1) 16.345 -1.327 11.586

    CO2 emissions from improved land (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 0

    Total GHG emissions from improved land (t CO2 eqiv.) 0 0 0

    3. Losses without improvement

    Improved period (years) 0 0 0

    Selected annual rate of methane emissions (t CH4-C ha-1 yr-1) -0.013 0.474 -0.001

    CH4 emissions from improved land (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 0

    Selected annual rate of carbone dioxide emissions (t CO2 ha-1 yr-1) 17.738 -1.327 20.759

    CO2 emissions from unimproved land (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 0

    Total GHG emissions from unimproved land (t CO2 eqiv.) 0 0 0

    RESULTS

    4. Reduction in GHG emissions due to improvement of site

    Reduction in GHG emissions due to improvement (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 0

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Arcus Consultancy Services Infinergy Page 22 November 2018

    Borrow Pits Exp. Min. Max.

    1. Description of site

    Area to be improved (ha) 2.2 0 2.2

    Depth of peat above water table before improvement (m) 0.5 0.4 0.6

    Depth of peat above water table after improvement (m) 0.45 0.5 0.3

    2. Losses with improvement

    Improved period (years) 5 5 5

    Selected annual rate of methane emissions (t CH4-C ha-1 yr-1) -0.012 -0.025 0.011

    CH4 emissions from improved land (t CO2 equiv.) -1.94 0 1.803

    Selected annual rate of carbone dioxide emissions (t CO2 ha-1 yr-1) 16.345 16.807 11.586

    CO2 emissions from improved land (t CO2 equiv.) 92.116 0 65.294

    Total GHG emissions from improved land (t CO2 eqiv.) 90.176 0 67.096

    3. Losses without improvement

    Improved period (years) 5 5 5

    Selected annual rate of methane emissions (t CH4-C ha-1 yr-1) -0.013 -0.022 -0.001

    CH4 emissions from improved land (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 0

    Selected annual rate of carbone dioxide emissions (t CO2 ha-1 yr-1) 17.738 13.764 20.759

    CO2 emissions from unimproved land (t CO2 equiv.) 195.117 0 228.344

    Total GHG emissions from unimproved land (t CO2 eqiv.) 195.117 0 228.344

    RESULTS

    4. Reduction in GHG emissions due to improvement of site

    Reduction in GHG emissions due to improvement (t CO2 equiv.) 104.941 0 161.248

  • Carbon Calculator

    Shepherds’ Rig Wind Farm

    Infinergy Arcus Consultancy Services November 2018 Page 23

    Foundations & Hardstanding Exp. Min. Max.

    1. Description of site

    Area to be improved (ha) 2.643 0 5.666

    Depth of peat above water table before improvement (m) 0.5 0 0.6

    Depth of peat above water table after improvement (m) 0.45 0 0.3

    2. Losses with improvement

    Improved period (years) 23 23 23

    Selected annual rate of methane emissions (t CH4-C ha-1 yr-1) -0.012 0.474 0.011

    CH4 emissions from improved land (t CO2 equiv.) -10.721 0 21.354

    Selected annual rate of carbone dioxide emissions (t CO2 ha-1 yr-1) 16.345 -1.327 11.586

    CO2 emissions from improved land (t CO2 equiv.) 509.037 0 773.512

    Total GHG emissions from improved land (t CO2 eqiv.) 498.316 0 794.866

    3. Losses without improvement

    Improved period (years) 23 23 23

    Selected annual rate of methane emissions (t CH4-C ha-1 yr-1) -0.013 0.474 -0.001

    CH4 emissions from improved land (t CO2 equiv.) 0 0 0

    Selected annual rate of carbone dioxide emissions (t CO2 ha-1 yr-1) 17.738 -1.327 20.759

    CO2 emissions from unimproved land (t CO2 equiv.) 1078.23 0 2705.12

    Total GHG emissions from unimproved land (t CO2 eqiv.) 1078.23 0 2705.12

    RESULTS

    4. Reduction in GHG emissions due to improvement of site

    Reduction in GHG emissions due to improvement (t CO2 equiv.) 579.91 0 1910.25