8/20/2019 Short article.pdf

1/2

It was a short article I wrote about a few scientific papers reported on the work of Iacoboni,

Mirror Neurons, based on the discovery of Rizzolatti. Collaboration sought to acquire these

papers. At that time, the team with which collaborated behavioral psychotherapy was

leaving and looking for other options.

Then my assumptions were: If changing certain assumptions therapists, could alter the way

they were linked to the child. The theory of mind, supported by Baron Cohen, was the area

within cognitive psychology, which more accurately realized what was happening on the

autistic thought. But following the discovery of mirror neurons, it had to revise concepts

such as imitation. There was emerging so called "Theory of Simulation".

The main criticism of the cognitive behavioral methods had been that forced the child to

imitate the therapist. But the "reciprocal imitation" and neuroscience experiments with

biofeedback is proposed to get in tune with the autistic child showing a mirror of itself,

because the real difficulty assumed that autism is imitate own initiative, departing abruptly

from its own inertia, but once it started the rhythm by mutual imitation was possible to

continue by playing, dancing, etc. So would biofeedback but through computer simulations.

This information imitation deficits in autistic children already existed but was ignored. The

prevailing model was the theory of mind to understand the main "cause" of autism.

According to which children have a brain module that helps build hypotheses about the

thinking of others. Proponents mirror neuron model are not opposed to the existence of

that module, but argue that it is the opposite: they are imitation deficits that generate

further deficits in the "theory of mind". Anyway, my involvement in these issues was very

brief, and I could not really make a successful collaboration from my place of 'technical'. I

do not know what it is currently investigating autism or what are the prevailing hypothesis.

Structuralism thinks the world this way, and proposes this methodology. So how it

corresponds to say modes. Well, it is working with the binary, with contrasts ... but in

contrast to another way of seeing the world.

Even within the structuralism 'the' structuralism, the Barthes, etc .. they would open

{The importance of this work for the social sciences will be given to the following: if the

meeting between computers and humans, as well as the encounter between two men, two

8/20/2019 Short article.pdf

2/2

minds, can be given to fight or to be Miguén. One dominates the other, dominates when it

serves, because it inhibits posicilibda that the other thinks. If lascomp occupying advancing

human llslugares previously performed, the study of this advance is essential. There are

two ways of saying the man as priority or the priority techn ... cost.

The first to study this, are facing losprimeros cybernetics. From this confrontation a man

cut, not cuestina .. details sugiran after an implementation that I could emerge. Or ..social

delhombre.

In technical lapreunta not incorporated the question is a humanol be.

Analyze the written bill gates.

Analyze hci, where he talks about discards and puts it as a great philosopher

Most human doctors proposed medical school because they deal with patients who are

human. Technicians place them prostheses people, technological prostheses that people

will use for a long time. In its design concept is included a conception of man only as a user.

{}

Voloshinov read all ideological discourse, and that's what makes a job well of thesis,

antithesis and synthesis, but hey, he writes from there. That is good, and that's what is not

explored how to say in relation to the place of ...

These are things to think and are opening doors for us interested in these issues.