Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
SINGAPOREAIRLINESAND
AIRASIAXHOWAIRLINESCREATEVALUEFOR
CUSTOMERS
AlbertusAndhika(816960)FrancesGuastalegname(698669)
CassandraTonkin(856101)LinQian(901693)YuhanShi(816195)
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3MARKET OVERVIEW 4
AirAsia Overview 4Singapore Airlines Overview 4
MARKET DRIVERS AND FACTORS 6Market Drivers 6Key macro-environmental factors 6
MARKET SEGMENTS 8TARGET SEGMENTS 11VALUE PROPOSITIONS 14VALUE DISCIPLINES, TYPES AND SOURCES OF VALUE 15BUSINESS MODEL PERSPECTIVE 20
AirAsia X – (Cost Leadership Strategy) 20Singapore Airlines (Differentiation) 21Head to Head (AirAsia and Singapore Airlines) 22
CONCLUSION 23APPENDICES 24REFERENCES 27
3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report analyses and compares how Singapore Airlines and AirAsia X (as a subsidiary of the
AirAsia Group) create value for their customers as part of the Asia-Pacific airline industry, and
whether these organisations actually deliver the value they promise. We begin with an overview of
Singapore Airlines, AirAsia X, and the Asia-Pacific airline industry, defining the industry, providing
key statistics and key market drivers and factors.
We then explore major customer segments in the industry, narrowing to examine how Singapore
Airlines and AirAsia segment and target their customers’ needs and value considerations. As both
airlines target business travellers, we follow this with an analysis of the types and sources of value
offered by each airline, comparing the two airlines’ value propositions for their target customers.
Finally, we evaluate and compare Singapore Airlines and AirAsia’s business models and conclude by
discussing whether the value offered by each airline is what their end customer receives.
4
MARKET OVERVIEW
The Asia-Pacific airline industry is comprised of passenger air transportation through both
scheduled and chartered flights, but excluding airfreight travel (MarketLine, 2017b, p.7). It is evident
that the industry as a whole has grown substantially in recent years (MarketLine, 2017b, p.7). Profit
margins in this industry surged in 2015, making the region the second most profitable airline market,
following North America (MarketLine, 2017b, p.7). Possessing total revenues of AUD$212,920.3
million in 2016, the Asia-Pacific airline industry saw a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of
9.4% between 2012 and 2016 (MarketLine, 2017b, p.8). Lastly, trend forecasts suggest that
performance of the Asia-Pacific airline industry will continue to grow, with an anticipated CAGR of
11.8% between 2016 and 2021 (MarketLine, 2017b, p.8).
AirAsia Overview
AirAsia Berhad (AirAsia Group) is one of Asia’s leading Low-Cost Carrier (LCC) airlines,
headquartered in Malaysia, and operating through a network of hubs in Thailand, the Philippines,
India and Indonesia (MarketLine, 2017, p. 3). AirAsia Group operates under two brand names –
AirAsia, specifically for domestic air transportation service, and AirAsia X for international flights –
but there is no difference between them as they both operate as LCCs. As noted by MarketLine in
2017, AirAsia Group possesses a market share of 49% in Malaysia, 22% in Thailand, 8% in
Indonesia, 11% in the Philippines and 4% in India (MarketLine, 2017a, p. 23). As of 2017, the
AirAsia Group operates flights between 109 destinations across 18 countries (MarketLine, 2017a, p.
5).
Singapore Airlines Overview
Singapore Airlines Group operates with a focus on the full-service passenger segment
(MarketLine, 2017c, p. 5) where its subsidiary SilkAir serves domestic flights and Singapore
Airlines serves international flights. Headquartered in Singapore, Singapore Airlines operates
throughout East Asia, South West Pacific, Europe, the Americas, and West Asia and Africa
(MarketLine, 2017c, p. 3). The full-service passenger segment is most important to the brand, with
this segment generating a total revenue of SGD10,134.2 million in the 2017 financial year
(MarketLine, 2017c, p.5).
5
Figure 1. Perceptual Map (Singapore Airlines Group and AirAsia Group)
As explained above, the perceptual map shows that Singapore Airlines Group and AirAsia Group
are competing in different segments (domestic versus international). Therefore, in this report we will
focus on international markets and compare Singapore Airlines with AirAsia X.
6
MARKET DRIVERS AND FACTORS
Market Drivers
Business travel spending in the Asia-Pacific is anticipated to grow “four times faster than in North
America and twice as fast as in Europe” between 2014-2018 (Singapore Tourism Board, 2015, p.2),
driving significant demand for air travel in the region.
Key macro-environmental factors
The following macro-environmental factors impact the Asia-Pacific airline industry most
significantly.
Political and legal
Political and legal factors influence whether airlines can operate in certain countries (Yashodha,
2012, p.1). Instead of an Open Skies policy as in Europe, each country has different requirements
which can prevent pilots and aircrafts from operating in countries outside their own (Paylor, 2017,
p.17). For instance, Indonesia, Laos and the Philippines only permit access to “specific areas and
airports", with Manila strictly "off limits" (Driskill 2016, p.54). Such restrictions are particularly
damaging for low-cost carriers like AirAsia X if they cannot afford joint ventures and local
certifications permitting access.
Economic
While 2015’s decline in crude oil prices presented favourable conditions (MarketLine 2017b, p.7),
costs are expected to increase in 2018 (Tarrant, 2017, p.5; MarketLine 2017b, p.20). These, along
with rising staff costs (MarketLine, 2014, p.16), impact costs for passengers in an industry already
“vulnerable” (MarketLine 2017b, p.22) to economic changes such as passenger income levels and
fluctuations in exchange rates, inflation and unemployment rates (MarketLine 2017b, p.22;
MarketLine 2014, p.15).
Environmental
International Air Transport Association (IATA) members, such as Singapore Airlines, are under
increased pressure to reduce air travel carbon emissions (IATA, 2017). IAT aims to improve fuel
7
efficiency by a yearly average of 1.5%, to reduce “net aviation carbon emissions by 50% by 2050,
relative to 2005 levels”, and to cap net aviation carbon emissions from 2020 onwards (IATA 2017).
The pressure is likely to impact passenger costs in the near future as airlines seek more
environmentally friendly methods (IATA, 2017).
8
MARKET SEGMENTS
According to Royo-Vela and Martinez-Garcia (2010), besides the monetary cost of the travel, several
other flight and trip related attributes, such as quality of service, purpose of travel, choice of
destination and frequency of travel, can influence air traveller preferences. Based on the study and
the demographic, psychographic and behavioural characteristics of the potential customers, the
major customer segments of airlines can be divided into four categories as follows:
Table 1. Market Segments of the Asia-Pacific airline industry
Segment Good deal seeker Quality vacationers
Business Traveller
Economic Business Traveller
Premium Business Traveller
Demographi c
Income Below average Average Low to Average Moderate to High
Occupat ion Students,
manufacturers, self-employed
White and blue collar workers,
families
Professional business people with frequent business trips
Psy chographi c s
Lifes ty l e “Price tag is everything.”
“I place high importance on
value-for-money”
“My travel allowance is
limited. I need to get there on time
and within budget.”
“I want to get there as conveniently and
comfortably as possible. Service quality is more important than
price.”
Behavioura l
9
Trave l f r equency Low (Up to 4 times/year�
Low (Up to 4 times/year�
High (approx. 5 times/month�
Moderate - High (approx. 20 times/
year�
Bene f i t sought Cheapest price Good service, good add-on products,
less transit
Price, convenience,
reliability
Luxury, quality of service,
convenience, comfort
Purchase o c cas ion Budget holiday, backpacking, quick
getaway
Family holiday Business trips Business trips
Distance o f t rave l
Domestic International Flights
Domestic and International
Flights
Domestic and International Flights
Loyal ty s ta tus Low Moderate High High
See: O’Connell & Williams (2005) and Singapore Tourism Board (2015).
1. Good deal Seeker (price-sensitive)
Passengers in this segment are price-sensitive and, due to their lower trip frequency, they are
able to book cheap tickets early. While AirAsia X describes itself as “the best low-cost airline”
(AirAsia, 2018a), passengers in this segment tend to perceive little differences between airlines,
which means they are less loyal to certain brands, making it hard for the company to achieve
long-term value (O’Connell & Williams, 2005, p.17).
2. Quality vacationers (quality service)
Quality vacationers are less price sensitive than good deal seekers, but place higher importance
on value-for-money. For example, they are more likely to choose the airline that provides
better quality service at an affordable price than choosing solely on price (O’Connell &
Williams, 2005, p.17).
3. Economic Business Traveller
Customers in this segment are middle class consumers who travel frequently for business but
are still price sensitive due to limited travel allowances. They seek value in convenience,
reliability and affordability (Singapore Tourism Board, 2015, p. 21, 23).
10
4. Premium Business Traveller
This segment consists of passengers with a high travelling budget. They typically fly several
times per month and may outsource the flight ticket booking processes to their assistant.
Priorities include high quality service, convenience, comfort and luxury, especially first or
business class which can reflect their high professional status. They are less price-sensitive
than other segments (Singapore Tourism Board, 2015, p.21; O’Connell & Williams, 2005,
p.17).
11
TARGET SEGMENTS
As a recent survey (Alex, 2015) indicates, almost all business travellers across Asia surveyed prioritise
convenience of flight times and routes. Both AirAsia X, with many alliances and joint ventures
across Asia (AirAsia, 2018f), and Singapore Airlines, with its widespread distribution network
(Hitesh, 2018), are able to provide speedy and efficient service for business travellers.
However, differences of the target market can be seen between the two companies mainly due to the
different budget of the business customers.
As noted by O’Connell & Williams (2005), male business travellers, who account for 8% of the
AirAsia passengers, are more likely to fly frequently with low cost airlines like AirAsia X mainly due
to their pereceived value of the budget air ticket and reluctance to pay for full-service fares. Among
them, many are self-employed or from small companies with fewer than 100 people, and have tight
budgets regulated by a supervisor. Therefore, the ‘Economic Business Traveller’, or the belt
tighteners, who account for 17% of all business traveller segment (Alex, 2015, p.21), is the most
attractive segment for AirAsia. Based on this, one profile of the chosen target segment is shown
below.
Brad, 28
Self-Employed Auditor
Departing from: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Travel Destination: Jakarta, Indonesia
Monthly Salary: RM30,000/year (USD$7690/year)
12
Amount willing to pay for a flight: RM390 (USD $100)
Reason for travelling: one-on-one business meeting
Choice of class: Economy
Choice of accommodation: Airbnb or hostel
Travel frequency: 3-4 times/ month
Biggest concern: Price and convenience
Buying criteria: ‘I need to get to my destination on budget, conveniently and on time.’
In contrast, those who come from the managerial level of larger enterprises (more than 100
employees), are middle or upper-middle class (Hitesh, 2018; O’Connell & Williams, 2005) and have
more freedom to choose their flight service (Alex, 2015), are more likely to travel with Singapore
Airlines. They would prefer to pay more for quality service, reliability, comfort and bonuses such as
separate beds, leather seats and LCD TVs, which are features in Singapore Airlines’ business class
service. Therefore, the ‘Premium Business Traveller’, or service seekers, who account for 34% of all
business travellers (Alex, 2015, p.21), is the most attractive segment for Singapore Airlines. Based on
this, one profile of the chosen target segment is shown below.
Julie, 42
Auditing Manager from PwC
Departing from: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Travel Destination: Jakarta, Indonesia
Monthly Salary: RM80,000/year (USD$20508/year)
Amount willing to pay for a round-trip flight: RM3900 (USD $1000)
Reason for travelling: monitoring the process of one overseas auditing project
Choice of class: Business
13
Choice of accommodation: four-star hotel
Travel frequency: 3-4 times/ month
Biggest concern: Service quality, comfort, quietness and productivity
Buying criteria: ‘I expect the highest level of service and features.’
14
VALUE PROPOSITIONS
Table 2. Value Proposition (AirAsia X and Singapore Airlines)
15
VALUE DISCIPLINES, TYPES AND SOURCES OF VALUE
By applying Treacy and Wiersema's (1992) value disciplines, we can compare how AirAsia and
Singapore Airlines’ deliver value on scales of customer intimacy, operational excellence and product
leadership (Treacy and Wiersema, 1992, p.2). Treacy and Wiersema argue leading organisations have
typically narrowed their focus to deliver customer value by excelling in one of these disciplines
rather than competing across all three (1992, p.2). These disciplines are explored in detail below.
Operational excellence
This discipline focuses on providing “reliable products or services at competitive prices” and with
“minimal difficulty or inconvenience” (Treacy and Wiersema, 1992, p.2). Singapore Airlines
competes in this discipline with its young fleet (80 month old planes versus the industry average of
148 months), which means fewer maintenance problems and costs, less compensation for flight
cancellations or delays, greater fuel efficiency and a “higher utilisation rate” - 13.7 hours of flight
time compared to the industry average of 11.3 hours per day (Heracleous and Wirtz, 2014, p.157).
Additionally, employees earn modest salaries yet are “highly productive” and motivated by potential
bonuses if the company performs well (Heracleous and Wirtz, 2014, p.156, p.159). Singapore
Airlines is also conservative behind the scenes, reducing costs for anything unrelated to their
passengers such as their modest headquarters (Heracleous and Wirtz, 2014, p.159). Singapore
Airlines’ operating costs resemble those of budget carriers (Heracleous and Wirtz 2014, p.156),
making it a strong competitor in the operational excellence discipline. However, while this helps
provide functional and cost/sacrifice value to premium business travellers by reducing risks and
transporting them to their destination smoothly, it is not Singapore Airlines’ core value discipline.
Similarly, AirAsia X is moderately strong in operational excellence, but it is not always punctual and
reliable (Smith, 2018). AirAsia X focuses on cost leadership, offering "low-cost, point-to-point
service between midsize cities and secondary airports", with its “no frills” culture and a primarily
“single-class service with no amenities” (Yashodha 2012, p.11166). While there are some available
extras (discussed below), these are optional because AirAsia X’s core offering is “affordable air
travel” (Yashodha, 2012, p.11167). The company has a ticketless services to decrease booking costs
and complexity, a variety of distribution channels, a “quick turnaround of 25 minutes” and a high
16
flight frequency, and adaptable, flexible employees who perform “various roles” (Yashodha, 2012,
p.11166), helping maintain low production costs and operational excellence. However, while cheap,
AirAsia X is not always reliable, reducing the functional and cost/sacrifice value it offers its
economic business travellers. To ensure low costs, AirAsia X utilises all fleets to full capacity
(AirAsia 2018g). However, factors such as weather impact airline punctuality and aircraft condition,
and AirAsia X is less punctual than its passengers may like. According to OAG Aviation, AirAsia
Philippines and Indonesia are punctual 58% and 56.8% of the time, respectively (Smith 2018), while
AirAsia Malaysia’s punctuality rate is 66.9% compared with Singapore Airlines’ 83.5% rate (OAG
Aviation Worldwide Limited, 2018). For AirAsia’s core customers – economic business travellers,
such as Brad, travelling on a budget for work – punctuality and reliability can be crucial, with delays
appearing unprofessional and impacting travel budgets and schedules. As noted by AirAsia itself,
passengers are sometimes refunded for cancellations and delays over 3 hours (AirAsia, 2018h,
AirAsia 2018c). While refunds can help, such compensation cannot bring back time, which can be
critical for business travellers. To excel in functional and cost/sacrifice value through operational
excellence, AirAsia X needs to improve its flight punctuality and reliability to reduce passengers’ risk
of being late.
Product leadership
Product leadership refers to “leading-edge products and services that consistently enhance the
customer’s use or application of the product, thereby making rivals’ goods obsolete” (Treacy and
Wiersema, 1992, p.3). Singapore Airlines endeavours to “introduce new services to sustain its
positioning as the industry leader” (Heracleous and Wirtz, 2014, pp.162-63), and has introduced
“high-risk” innovations now accepted as industry norms such as “free alcoholic drinks onboard, free
headphones to watch movies, individual video-on-demand for all classes and book-the-cook
services” (Heracleous and Wirtz, 2014, p.162). While exciting innovations like ‘book-the-cook’ add
hedonic and symbolic value for premium business travellers, these passengers also seek great
customer service and reliability, which is not just about product leadership. Singapore Airlines has
also implemented a revenue management system used by other airlines to reduce costs and risks
(Heracleous and Wirtz, 2014, p.162). As such, this discipline is not their core discipline, but one of
moderate strength.
17
Although online booking and ticketless innovations have been linked with AirAsia (AirAsia 2018a),
AirAsia X focuses primarily on budget fares and low operating costs (Yashodha 2012, p.11166),
which is difficult when trying to offer product leadership and innovation (Treacy and Wiersema,
1992, p.3; Heracleous and Wirtz, 2014, p.151). Innovation requires “significant resource
investments”, while cost leadership involves “cutting costs wherever possible while maintaining
adequate quality" (Heracleous and Wirtz, 2014, p.151). Offering primarily a “single class service”,
AirAsia X focuses on low operating costs while transporting passengers “from point A to point B”
without “luxuries or frills” like the meals, drinks and inflight entertainment of a full cost carrier
(AirAsia 2018g). As such, AirAsia X is competent in this value dimension, focusing on functional
and cost/sacrifice value for economic business travellers through budget fares and “lean, simple and
efficient” operations (AirAsia 2018a).
Customer intimacy
Customer intimacy involves targeted segmentation and “combining detailed customer knowledge
with operational flexibility [to] respond quickly to almost any need” (Treacy and Wiersema, 1992,
p.2). Singapore Airlines excels in this, segmenting and “tailoring offerings to match the demands of
those niches” and responding to individual needs (Treacy and Wiersema, 1992, p.2). While
Singapore Airlines has some standardisation, such as cabin crew appearance, they also offer
symbolic and experiential value through personalisation, such as greeting high-tiered frequent fliers
by name and bringing them their favourite wine without request (Heracleous and Wirtz, 2014,
p.164). For premium business travellers who are willing to pay extra for greater comfort,
convenience and quality service, this is where Singapore Airlines provides the most value. Staff are
trained to anticipate passengers’ needs and “impress” by fulfilling unexpressed requests, such as
tending to ill passengers or assisting passengers travelling with children (Heracleous and Wirtz, 2014,
p.164). In their personalised treatment of passengers, Singapore Airlines segments them and tailors
their service to match their needs accordingly, providing experiential and symbolic value for
premium business travellers while simultaneously increasing customer loyalty and reducing customer
acquisition costs (Heracleous and Wirtz, 2014, p.157).
While AirAsia X offers semi-personalised, optional extras, these are additions to its basic, economy
class “low fare” service (AirAsia 2018d), which can be added for “a small fee” (AirAsia 2018d).
18
These extras are available to any passenger willing to pay approximately USD$15-54 extra and
include options such as seat selection, a meal, checked baggage, up to two changes of date or time
and express boarding and check-in (AirAsia 2018d). While these extras can be considered responses
to different needs within AirAsia X’s segments and can offer experiential and cost/sacrifice value,
they are extensions of the basic, functional service on offer, rather than personalised, targeted
options designed to “respond quickly to almost any need” (Treacy and Wiersema, 1992, p.2), as with
Singapore Airlines. Furthermore, the costs of these extras can be ambiguous, with special terms and
conditions (AirAsia 2018e) potentially decreasing their value if their economic business travellers
exceed their budget with hidden costs (thereby reducing cost/sacrifice value). Thus, customer
intimacy levels at AirAsia X are competent, but not their strong point.
Summary
Singapore Airlines seeks differentiation by remaining competitive across operational excellence and
product leadership, and excelling in customer intimacy. Its quality service is based on excellent
customer intimacy, evident through personalisation and responding to passenger needs. Along with
its premium service, Singapore Airlines has strong operations and offers luxuries premium business
travellers (such as Julie, the Auditing Manager for PWC) are willing to pay for to make their flight
more enjoyable and comfortable (thereby demonstrating some product leadership). As evident in
Table 3, Singapore Airlines’ core value discipline is customer intimacy, but value is also evident
through operational excellence and product leadership, meaning passengers can gain symbolic,
experiential and cost/sacrifice types of value.
Meanwhile, as shown below in Table 3, AirAsia X is not overly strong in any of the disciplines, but
its low costs are maintained through its moderate degree of operational excellence. By keeping costs
to a minimum, AirAsia X offers affordable flights for its target passengers – economic business
travellers, such as Brad the self-employed auditor – because, unlike premium business travellers,
factors such as price, convenience and time are more important than service (customer intimacy)
and luxuries (product leadership). These customers prioritise travelling to their destination
conveniently and cheaply, seeking functional and cost/sacrifice value types. However, AirAsia is not
always reliable and punctual, so some of this potential value is reduced (Smith 2018).
19
Table 3. Value Disciplines (AirAsia X versus Singapore Airlines)
20
BUSINESS MODEL PERSPECTIVE
Singapore Airlines delivers their value proposition to customers by providing high quality air
transportation services throughout and beyond the Asia-Pacific region. In order to deliver this kind
of service, Singapore Airlines provides value through their value disciplines: excellent customer
intimacy and moderately strong operational excellence and product leadership. In comparison,
AirAsia’s value proposition is delivering low fare air transportation to their customers with
destinations mostly in Asia-Pacific. The different value propositions offered by each airline
demonstrate distinct business models.
AirAsia X – (Cost Leadership Strategy)
Figure 2. AirAsia X’s Pricing strategy
As shown in Figure 2 and AirAsia X’s Business Model (See: Appendix 2), AirAsia implements
cost-leadership strategies to ensure their low-cost operations, so AirAsia X can sell the cheapest
fares to their target customers, economic business travellers. AirAsia X’s low fares create small profit
margins so, to gain more profit, AirAsia X charges passengers additional fees for add-on, in-flight
services. Further, the low fare strategy also indicates that AirAsia X’s pricing objectives were derived
by internal orientation to boost sales volume. In general, there are six key factors that affect AirAsia
X’s key resources and cost structures in their business model which are (AirAsia, 2018g): high
21
aircraft utilisation (AirAsia ensures that their aircraft are flying as much as possible during a day), no
frills (passengers buy only their seat and other services such as assigned seating, food and drinks are
excluded), streamlined operations (AirAsia only has one seating class and a single type of aircraft
which helps them to reduce the complexity in managing the aircraft’s operation), secondary airports
(which are cheaper than premium airports) and a lean distribution system, where most of the tickets
are primarily sold through AirAsia’s website. AirAsia’s website can be seen as an independent sales
force since it focuses on selling cheap fares. In order to generate income, AirAsia X receives their
income through the sale of add-on, in-flight services, low fare tickets and advertising. In order to
maintain its customers, AirAsia X also implemented a frequent flyer program to increase customer
loyalty.
Singapore Airlines (Differentiation)
Figure 3. One Ticket Comparison between Singapore Airlines and AirAsia X)
As evident in Figure 3 and Singapore Airline’s Business Model (See: Appendix 1), Singapore
Airlines implements their differentiation strategy through giving a high quality in-flight experience to
their customers, who are mainly premium business travellers. Singapore Airlines offers full service to
their customers, with fares driven by a skimming price strategy. As evident in their key resources
(See: Appendix 1), one of the features provided by Singapore Airlines is the Companion App,
which allows customers to review the video and audio content available on board before their flight
and to create pre-selected favourites lists (Singapore Airlines, 2017). Singapore Airlines has also
Categorisation Singapore Airlines AirAsia X
Class of Seating Basic Economy
Price US$ 390 US$ 29.30
Facility 35kg baggage allowance, meals, in-flight entertainment, seat selection
No facility (Add on +US$ 54.72 for 20kg baggage allowance, 1 meal and seat selection, no in-flight entertainment)
Policy Cancellation and Itinerary change is allowed
Cancellation and Itinerary change is not allowed
22
committed to acquiring new Airbus A350-900s, Boeing 777-9 and 787-10 aircraft, which have the
latest technology in the market (Singapore Airlines, 2017). Singapore Airlines is also collaborating
with their subsidiary (see: Appendix 3), which consist of travel companies and aircraft maintenance
companies to increase their entry barriers and bargaining position relative to suppliers as well as to
ensure the stability of their operational costs and provide more benefits to their customers, such as
discounts on five-star hotels (Singapore Airlines, 2017). Singapore Airlines has also acquired other
airline companies in other countries to help create joint ventures, therefore increasing connectivity
and their available destinations. To strengthen customer relationships, Singapore Airlines offers their
frequent flyer program, KrisFlyer, and the PPS Club, for KrisFlyers who spend more than
SG$25,000 accumulatively (Singapore Airlines, 2018).
Head to Head (AirAsia and Singapore Airlines)
Both airlines target business travellers, yet they offer different benefits to different segments of
business travellers. One of AirAsia X’s key activities is flight schedule management, where AirAsia X
utilises all of its fleets in full capacity, which results in only a 25-minute turnaround time to increase
passenger volume (AirAsia, 2018g). Meanwhile, Singapore Airlines prioritises the comfort of their
passengers, with an average 60-minute turnaround time. However, the lower turnaround time may
impact airline punctuality. According to OAG Aviation, AirAsia Malaysia’s punctuality rate was
66.9% compared with Singapore Airlines’ 83.5% punctuality rate (OAG Aviation Worldwide
Limited, 2018). For business travellers, flight punctuality is particularly important, and by analysing
the business models of both airlines, the advantages and disadvantages of the airlines can be easily
identified.
23
CONCLUSION
For a LCC, AirAsia X offers economic business travellers some value through its low fares and
relatively large network. Its quick turnaround time and “no frills” culture enable passengers to travel
cheaply, fairly conveniently and quickly throughout the Asia-Pacific. With its cost leadership and
moderate operational excellence, AirAsia maintains low fares for its passengers and can provide
good quality service for the price paid. However, as AirAsia X is not always punctual and reliable,
some of this potential value can be lost through flight cancellations and delays. While a viable option
for economic business travellers, AirAsia X could provide greater value.
In contrast, Singapore Airlines offers premium business travellers high quality service through its
high levels of customer intimacy. Singapore Airlines provides value through personalised service and
moderate levels of product leadership and operational excellence. Provided premium business
travellers are willing to pay for it, they are likely to find great value in Singapore Airlines’ reliability,
flight convenience, luxurious comfort and premium customer service.
24
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1: SINGAPORE AIRLINES BUSINESS MODEL
KEY PARTNERS - Food supplier
and Entertainment Industries
- Aircraft Maintenance Services Companies (Subsidiary of Singapore Airlines)
- Airport (Civil Aviation Authorities)
- Aircraft Manufacturer (Airbus and Boeing)
- Fuel Supplier - Travel Agent
KEY ACTIVITIES - Flight
Scheduling and maintenance
- Baggage management
- Online ticketing
VALUE PROPOSITION - Air
transportation services with the highest quality and world destinations
CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - Self-service
kiosk check-in - Automated Bag
drop - Refund for
delay - Call Centre - Automation
Service - Frequent Flyer
Program (KrisFlyer and PPS Club)
- Ground Services (Airport Lounge - SilverKris)
CUSTOMER SEGMENTS - Premium
Business Traveler
KEY RESOURCES - Multi-Hub
Strategy through acquiring other airlines
- Multiple type of class seating
- Premium Airport
- Technology (i.e. Companion App)
- Lean Human Resources
- Singapore Airlines Online Ticketing
CHANNELS - Online
ticketing (Singapore Airlines Website)
- Sales Office - Travel Agent
COST STRUCTURE - Airport lounge expenses, frequent flyer programme
cost, computer reservation system booking fees, advertising expenses, reservation system IT cost, Aircraft maintenance and overhaul costs, Inflight meals and other passenger costs, Airport, and overflying charges.
REVENUE STREAMS - Multiple type of class seating
from basic premium, business and first class.
25
APPENDIX 2: AIRASIA X BUSINESS MODEL
KEY PARTNERS - Airport (Civil
Aviation Authorities)
- Aircraft Manufacturer (Airbus)
- Fuel Supplier (Petronas Dagangan Bhd)
- Travel Agent - Web Hosting
(Akamai)
KEY ACTIVITIES - Flight
Scheduling and maintenance
- Baggage management
- Online ticketing
VALUE PROPOSITION - Low Fare
Flight
CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - Low Fares
Marketing Campaign
- Refund for delay - Call Centre - Automation
Service - AirAsia Big
Points and Mycorporate program (Membership Program)
CUSTOMER SEGMENTS - Economy
Business Traveler
KEY RESOURCES - Single type of
aircraft - Single Class
Seating - Secondary
Airport - Lean Human
Resources - AirAsia
Online Ticketing
CHANNELS - Online ticketing
(AirAsia Website)
- Few Sales Office - Few Travel
Agent
COST STRUCTURE - Low operating cost (high aircraft utilization, streamline
operations, secondary airport, few sales office, low training cost, maintenance cost, long-term contract with Web Hosting)
REVENUE STREAMS - Economies of scales (Large
quantities of low fares) - Additional in-flight services (food,
drinks, baggage, WIFI, pillow) - Advertising
26
APPENDIX 3: SINGAPORE AIRLINES SUBSIDIARIES
27
REFERENCES
28
29