19
Single Notcher: DECISION MAKING CONSIDERATIONS, BY MATT MCCOLLEY.

Single Notcher Comparison

  • Upload
    ssnvet

  • View
    229

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Machinery specifications for Baker single notcher compared to PRS single notcher

Citation preview

Page 1: Single Notcher Comparison

Single Notcher:DECISION MAKING CONSIDERATIONS, BY MATT MCCOLLEY.

Page 2: Single Notcher Comparison

BACKGROUND: 1. During the Systematic Plant Layout process for the woodshop, a running list of improvement recommendations was recorded, with mention made several times to the inadequacy of our current single notcher.

2. When machinery requirements to execute our most common tasks were considered, the need for a better single notcher rose to the top of the priority list.

3. The lengthy set-up time for the new double notcher precludes it’s use for low volume jobs that are not run on a weekly basis.

4. Our existing single notcher has been identified as a potential safety problem, as it requires the worker to push stock into the cutter head with the weight of their body.

5. Given these considerations, the President tasked the Engineering Manager to identify the most appropriate single notcher for our needs.

Page 3: Single Notcher Comparison

Types of machine1. Type of feed

1. Manual feed2. Hopper/Conveyor feed

2. Manual advance vs. pneumatic powered advance.

Page 4: Single Notcher Comparison

Three viable manufacturers identified:1. Baker2. Pallet Repair Systems (PRS)3. Universal Machinery Sales

(Excluded from consideration due to company considerations identified.)

Page 5: Single Notcher Comparison

Machine Features1. Motor HP (10, 15, 20)

2. Dust control and collection

3. Stringer size capacity (width & length)

4. Type of cutter head

5. Type of linear motion control

6. Actuation (2-hand, remote vs. local, shrouded vs. exposed)

7. Gaurding (shield vs. automatic door)

Page 6: Single Notcher Comparison

Baker PRS 20 HP 15 HP or 20 HP

Page 7: Single Notcher Comparison

HORSE POWER1. Existing single nother: 10 HP2. Baker: 20 HP3. PRS: 15 HP or 20 HP4. Main affect? Cycle Time

Page 8: Single Notcher Comparison

Dust collection

Page 9: Single Notcher Comparison

Dust CollectionBaker (sweep) PRS (chute)

Page 10: Single Notcher Comparison

Maximum Stock Size Baker PRS

width = 4-3/4” Width = 4-3/4”

Length = 104” w/ fence stop Length = ?? (smaller, can customize)

(unlimited without stop) ( unlimited without stop)

Page 11: Single Notcher Comparison

CUTTER HEAD BAKER uses Profile Tech PRL uses Econo Tool

(same as double notcher)

Page 12: Single Notcher Comparison

Linear Motion ControlBaker PRS

THK Linear Rails Cam Follower Bearings

Page 13: Single Notcher Comparison

Baker actuator (local, shrouded, 2 hands)

Page 14: Single Notcher Comparison

PRS (remote, exposed, 2 hands)

Page 15: Single Notcher Comparison

Baker safety: shield over top

Page 16: Single Notcher Comparison

Baker Safety: Pop-up plate

Page 17: Single Notcher Comparison

PRS safety: cover plate

Page 18: Single Notcher Comparison

Stock ClampingBaker (mechanical linkage to sliding plate)

Page 19: Single Notcher Comparison

Stock ClampingPRS (pneumatic pistons)