Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 1

Site 1 - Land at Upland Road

Criterion Reasoning Score

1. Landscape Designation

Within AONB

0

2. Nature Conservation

Designation

SNCI

0

3. How visible and open

in character

Site is visible and open in character. Visible to

existing homes and roads, and visible in long views

over open valley.

0

4. Can visual impact be mitigated?

Site cannot be readily screened with appropriate landscaping

0

5. Previously developed

land

Greenfield site

0

6. Close to residential properties?

Adjoins existing homes.

3

7. Any adverse impact on

residential amenity?

Residential amenity for both settled and travelling

community difficult to protect.

0

8. A. Relationship to school

Not within 800m

0

B. Relationship to

Shop/post office

Within 800m

3

C. Relationship to health facilities

Within 800m

3

9. Availability of public

transport

Within visual range

2

10. Suitable for accommodation by

Gypsies and Travellers

Acceptable residential amenity. No potential land contamination. Low road noise

3

Location Score

14

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 2

11. Availability of services

Potential services. Homes nearby

3

12. Suitable access

Potential access onto Pashley Road

3

13. Cost of delivery

Potential moderate cost. Sloping site and will require earthworks.

2

14. Size of site

Could accommodate total identified need.

2

Deliverability Score

10

UPLAND

24

Cherry Garden

LAN

EAST DEAN ROAD

95

Escape Lane

Tank

CLOSE

PASHLEY ROAD

68.4m

Hostel

PASHLEY

55

3

Cottage

5

36

RO

AD

RIDGE

43

101.5m

1

1142

47

ROAD

37

82.9m

49

29

Cherry Garden Plantation

DS

92.7m

Youth

76.5m

53

4

LAND AT UPLANDS ROAD

Scale0 10 20 30 40 m

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 3

Site 2 – Land north of Peppercombe Road

Criterion Reasoning Score

1. Landscape

Designation

Within AONB

0

2. Nature Conservation Designation

SNCI

0

3. How visible and open

in character

Site is visually contained within tree cover.

3

4. Can visual impact be mitigated?

Site can be effectively screened by existing trees

3

5. Previously developed

land

Greenfield site

0

6. Close to residential properties?

Close to existing homes but not adjoining

2

7. Any adverse impact on

residential amenity?

Residential amenity for both settled and travelling

community readily protected

3

8. A. Relationship to school

Within 800m

3

B. Relationship to

Shop/post office

Within 800m

3

C. Relationship to health facilities

Within 800m

3

9. Availability of public

transport

Not within visual range

0

10. Suitable for accommodation by

Gypsies and Travellers

Acceptable residential amenity. No potential land contamination. Low road noise.

3

Location Score

23

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 4

11. Availability of services

No Potential services

0

12. Suitable access

Access only available across open Downland from track to west.

0

13. Cost of delivery

Potential high cost

0

14. Size of site

Could accommodate total identified need

2

Deliverability Score

2

93

36

95

24

Path (u

m)

13

79.2m

Path (um)

Path (um)

69.5m

Path (um)

Path (um)

PEPPERCOMBE ROAD

25

83

LAND NORTH OF PEPPERCOMBE ROAD

Scale0 10 20 30 40 m

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 5

Site 3 – Land West of Priory Heights

Criterion Reasoning Score

1. Landscape

Designation

Within AONB

0

2. Nature Conservation Designation

SNCI. Potential to become LNR

0

3. How visible and open

in character

Site is visible and open in character. Visible to

existing homes and roads, and visible in long views over open valley.

0

4. Can visual impact be

mitigated?

Site cannot be readily screened with appropriate

landscaping

0

5. Previously developed land

Greenfield site

0

6. Close to residential

properties?

Adjoins existing homes.

3

7. Any adverse impact on residential amenity?

Residential amenity potentially protectable

2

8. A. Relationship to

school

Within 800m

3

B. Relationship to Shop/post office

Within 800m

3

C. Relationship to

health facilities

Not within 800m

0

9. Availability of public transport

Within visual range

2

10. Suitable for

accommodation by Gypsies and Travellers

Acceptable residential amenity. No potential land

contamination. Low road noise

3

Location Score

16

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 6

11. Availability of services

Potential services

3

12. Suitable access

Potential access onto Priory Heights

3

13. Cost of delivery

Potential moderate cost. Sloping site

2

14. Size of site

Can accommodate total identified need

2

Deliverability Score

10

19

43

51

47

13

33

26

23

Fox Holes

HEIG

HTS

1

7

9

39

53

42

38

1620

Path (um)

17

11

35

41

PRIO

RY

72

39

32

53

1422

El Sub Sta

50

44BRACKEN ROAD

34

LAND WEST OF PRIORY HEIGHTS

Scale0 10 20 30 40 m

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 7

Site 4 – Land at Chalk Farm

Criterion Reasoning Score

1. Landscape

Designation

Within AONB

0

2. Nature Conservation Designation

SNCI

0

3. How visible and open

in character

Site partially open in character. Potentially visible in

long views over Downland. Backdrop of development. Mobile Home already on site

2

4. Can visual impact be

mitigated?

Site can be readily screened with appropriate

landscaping. Mobile home already on site.

3

5. Previously developed land

Greenfield site

0

6. Close to residential

properties?

Close to existing homes.

3

7. Any adverse impact on residential amenity?

Residential amenity protectable

2

8. A. Relationship to

school

Within 800m

3

B. Relationship to Shop/post office

Within 800m

3

C. Relationship to

health facilities

Within 800m

3

9. Availability of public transport

Within visual range

2

10. Suitable for

accommodation by Gypsies and Travellers

Acceptable residential amenity. No potential land

contamination. Low road noise

3

Location Score

26

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 8

11. Availability of services

Potential services from Chalk Farm

3

12. Suitable access

Potential access onto Coopers Hill

3

13. Cost of delivery

Potential low cost

3

14. Size of site

Can accommodate total identified need

2

Deliverability Score

11

1

235.0m

Chalk Farm

Und

5

Cottages

3

5

32.5m

40.2m

118

Bank

Def

2

10

6

CHALK FARM CLO

SE

13

42.7m

1

10

CP and ED Bdy

136

17

35

SP

9

Chalk Farm

Und

147

3

El Sub Sta

FW

TAS COMBE WAY

21

Und

THE CROFT

16

1

PH

Chalk

14

FW

Hotel

Kingsmead

The Boro

1

2

14

1

FW

2

10

COO

PERS HILL

LAND AT CHALK FARM

Scale0 10 20 30 40 m

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 9

Site 5 – Land at Cornish Farm

Criterion Reasoning Score

1. Landscape Designation

Within AONB

0

2. Nature Conservation

Designation

SNCI

0

3. How visible and open

in character

Site is visible and open in character. Open

Downland character. Any site must relate directly to

farm buildings.

0

4. Can visual impact be mitigated?

Difficult to screen in open landscape

0

5. Previously developed

land

Greenfield site

0

6. Close to residential properties?

Far from existing homes

0

7. Any adverse impact on

residential amenity?

No adverse impact

3

8. A. Relationship to school

Not within 800m

0

B. Relationship to

Shop/post office

Not within 800m

0

C. Relationship to health facilities

Not within 800m

0

9. Availability of public

transport

Beachy Head Road bus within visual range

2

10. Suitable for accommodation by

Gypsies and Travellers

Acceptable residential amenity. Potential land contamination due to agricultural activities. Exposed

site

2

Location Score

7

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 10

11. Availability of services

Potential services from farm

3

12. Suitable access

Potential access

3

13. Cost of delivery

Potential low cost

3

14. Size of site

Could accommodate total identified need

2

Deliverability Score

11

Tumulus

Track

Boro Const B

dy

Car Park

SR

BS

51.6m

Def

(site of)

50.1m

Pond

Cornish Farm

33.9m

Co Const, CP & ED

Bdy

Tumulus

Horseshoe Plantation

35.1m

Tumulus

34.1m

Def

Kiln Combe

LAND AT CORNISH FARM

Scale0 25 50 75100 m

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 11

Site 6 – Land at Bullock Down Farm

Criterion Reasoning Score

15. Landscape Designation

Within AONB

0

16. Nature Conservation

Designation

SNCI

0

17. How visible and open

in character

Site is visible and open in character. Open

Downland character. Any site must relate directly to

farm buildings.

0

18. Can visual impact be mitigated?

Difficult to screen in open landscape

0

19. Previously developed

land

Greenfield site

0

20. Close to residential properties?

Far from existing homes

0

21. Any adverse impact on

residential amenity?

No adverse impact

3

22. A. Relationship to school

Not within 800m

0

B. Relationship to

Shop/post office

Not within 800m

0

D. Relationship to health facilities

Not within 800m

0

23. Availability of public

transport

Beachy Head Road bus within visual range

2

24. Suitable for accommodation by

Gypsies and Travellers

Acceptable residential amenity. Potential land contamination due to agricultural activities. Exposed

site

2

Location Score

7

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 12

25. Availability of services

Potential services from farm

3

26. Suitable access

Potential access

3

27. Cost of delivery

Potential low cost

3

28. Size of site

Could accommodate total identified need

2

Deliverability Score

11

Bullock Down Farm

Tumulus

Farm Cottages

The

Pond

Field System

Car

Par

k

Track

Bullock Down

2

(site of)

Path (u

m)

Track

Pond

Heathy BrowPath (um)

1

Sweet Brow

Bullock Down

148.0m

Farm

Bullock Down

Pond

Pond

House

CottagePond

(Site of)

147.6m

Tumulus

Track

152.7m

BEA

CH

Y H

EAD

RO

AD

Tumulus

(Site of)

152.5m

Path (u

m)

Tumulus

LAND AT BULLOCK DOWN FARM

Scale0 25 50 75100 m

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 13

Site 7 – Land at Black Robin Farm

Criterion Reasoning Score

29. Landscape Designation

Within AONB

0

30. Nature Conservation

Designation

SNCI

0

31. How visible and open

in character

Site is visible and open in character. Open

Downland character. Any site must relate directly to

farm buildings.

0

32. Can visual impact be mitigated?

Difficult to screen in open landscape

0

33. Previously developed

land

Greenfield site

0

34. Close to residential properties?

Far from existing homes

0

35. Any adverse impact on

residential amenity?

No adverse impact

3

36. A. Relationship to school

Not within 800m

0

B. Relationship to

Shop/post office

Not within 800m

0

E. Relationship to health facilities

Not within 800m

0

37. Availability of public

transport

Beachy Head Road bus within visual range

2

38. Suitable for accommodation by

Gypsies and Travellers

Acceptable residential amenity. Potential land contamination due to agricultural activities. Exposed

site

2

Location Score

7

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 14

39. Availability of services

Potential services from farm

3

40. Suitable access

Potential access

3

41. Cost of delivery

Potential low cost

3

42. Size of site

Could accommodate total identified need

2

Deliverability Score

11

BE

Mound

148.6m

Bungalows

Black Robin Farm

El Sub Sta

137.1m

145.3m

121.8m

ck Robin Bottom4

106.8m

128.4m

137.0m

132.0m

1Pond

Pond

Black Robin

LAND AT BLACK ROBIN FARM

Scale0 20 40 60 80 m

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 15

Site 8 – Land at Upper Dukes Drive

Criterion Reasoning Score

1. Landscape

Designation

Within AONB

0

2. Nature Conservation Designation

None

2

3. How visible and open

in character

Site is visually contained within tree cover

3

4. Can visual impact be mitigated?

Site is effectively screened with existing tree cover

3

5. Previously developed

land

Greenfield site

0

6. Close to residential properties?

Close to existing homes

2

7. Any adverse impact on

residential amenity?

No adverse impact

3

8. A. Relationship to school

Within 800m

3

B. Relationship to

Shop/post office

Within 800m

3

C. Relationship to health facilities

Not within 800m

0

9. Availability of public

transport

Not within visual range

0

10. Suitable for accommodation by

Gypsies and Travellers

Acceptable residential amenity. No potential land contamination. Low road noise

3

Location Score

22

Eastbourne Gypsy and Traveller site assessment Parker Dann 16

11. Availability of services

Limited service provision. No nearby dveleopment

0

12. Suitable access

Potential access problems

0

13. Cost of delivery

Potential high cost. Steeply sloping site with extensive tree cover

0

14. Size of site

Could accommodate total identified need

2

Deliverability Score

2

Primary School

Gardens

CO

MBE LA

NE

1

23

Well Combe

100.5m

Cour

t

Allotment

7

75.9m

1

24

Basl

ow

St John's

28

103.8m

33

1 to

11

83.8m

7

Sub Sta

El

17

86.2m

UPPER DUKE'S DRIVE

79.9m

90.7m

ROWSLEY ROAD

15a

24

UPPE

R DU

KE'S

DRI

VEMeads C of E

95.3m

23

LAND AT DUKES DRIVE

Scale0 10 20 30 40 m