Upload
george-wood
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
1/45
20 June 2014 1 of 45
Research Report:
Patronage research for the Auckland Harbour Bridge
Pathway project
Prepared June 2014 for:
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
2/45
20 June 2014 2 of 45
Contents
1. ExecutiveSummary................................................................................................................................ 3
2. Background............................................................................................................................................ 6
3. Methodology.......................................................................................................................................... 6
4. SurveyFindings...................................................................................................................................... 7
4.1. Comparisonswithprevious(2013)researchfindings.................................................................. 7
4.2. Currentcommutingmethod........................................................................................................ 8
4.3. Seasonaluse................................................................................................................................ 8
4.4. Weeklyuse................................................................................................................................... 9
4.5. Peaktimes.................................................................................................................................. 10
4.6.
SkyPathApproach
A
...................................................................................................................
10
4.7. SkyPathApproachB................................................................................................................... 12
4.8. Likelyparkingareas................................................................................................................... 12
4.9. Likelihoodofbusandshuttleuse............................................................................................... 14
4.10. PreferenceinrelationtoNorthernLinkpathway.................................................................... 14
4.11. Southernroutes....................................................................................................................... 16
4.12. Cycle/walkcombinationforrecreationalusers....................................................................... 17
4.13. Interestinbicyclerentals......................................................................................................... 18
4.14. Interestinaddonexperiences................................................................................................. 19
5. ApplicationtoDemandProjectionModel........................................................................................... 21
5.1. Recreational&CommuterPatronageProportions.................................................................... 21
5.2. Domestic&InternationalVisitorPatronage.............................................................................. 23
5.3. CombinedTripNumbers Residents&Visitors......................................................................... 27
6.
Appendices...........................................................................................................................................
34
6.1. Demographics............................................................................................................................ 34
6.2. Questionnaire............................................................................................................................ 36
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
3/45
20 June 2014 3 of 45
1. Executive SummaryTheSkyPathconceptwasdevelopedbytheAucklandHarbourBridgePathwayTrust(theTrust)tocloseacriticalgap
in Aucklands cycling and walking network. During the second half of 2013, Angus & Associates was engaged by
AucklandCounciltoprovideareviewofpreviouspatronageforecastsandotherdocumentation,aswellastoconduct
additionalprimaryresearchintopotentialusergroupings. Primaryresearchconsideredthedifferentaspectsofuse,
aswellasthedevelopmentofademandprojectionmodelestimatingpotentialtripsforthefirst20yearsofoperation.
The 2013 demand projection model was based on conservative assumptions and included total yearly patronage
estimatesforthemainmarketsegments,namelydomesticandinternationalvisitorstoAuckland,aswellasAuckland
residents. The projection model excluded a number of potential market segments, such as cruise ships and tour
groups,aswellasspecificchildvisitation.
Subsequenttothisfirstroundofresearch,AucklandCouncilandtheTrustaskedAngus&Associatestorefinethetotal
estimatesfurther inordertoderivemoreclarityaboutspecificvariations indemandoverthecourseoftheyear,a
typicalweekandatypicalday/timeforplanningpurposes.Tothisendanotherroundofprimaryquantitativeresearch
wasconductedwithAucklandresidents.Thisreportreferstothefindingsofthepreviousresearchas2013research
andtothecurrentfindingsas2014research.
Surveycomparisons:
The2014surveyrepeatedthesampleofAucklandresidentsandalsothemeasuresofinterestandpropensitytouse
SkyPath.These
were
included
to
match
previous
research
outcomes
as
closely
as
possible
in
order
to
be
able
to
apply
thecurrentfindingstothe2013demandestimation.Acomparisonofthe2013and2014resultsshowsverysimilar
levelsofinterestandusepropensity.
Both surveys measured the respective proportions of respondents indicating some likelihood to use SkyPath for
recreationand/orcommutingpurposes.Theserespondentswherethenaskedquestionsrelatingtotheirrecreational
and/orcommutinguseofSkyPath.
Currentcommuting
methods:
Respondents of the 2014 survey who indicated they would use SkyPath for commuting were asked by which
methodstheycurrentlycommutetoandfromtheirplaceofworkorstudy.Therearedistinctvariationsinthemodes
oftransportfavoured;howevermotorvehiclesarethemostcommonformofcommutertransport.
UsePatterns:
ThesurveyalsoincludedasetofquestionsaskingrespondentstoestimatetheiruseofSkyPath(basedonproportions
ofusetotallingto100%).Thissetofquestionswasaskedinrelationtotheseasons,weeklyuse,timeofday,aswellas
themethod/mode
of
transport
to
approach
SkyPath.
Please
note
that
in
this
analysis,
atrip
refers
to
one
trip
over
SkyPath.Areturnjourneycomprisestwotrips.
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
4/45
20 June 2014 4 of 45
Theresultssuggestthat,onaverage,40%ofcommuterand45%ofrecreationaltripscouldbeundertakenduringthe
summermonths,whilstthewinterperiodisexpectedtorepresentthelowseasonwithasignificantlysmallernumber
of trips for both commuting (16%) and recreational purposes (12%). Applying the proportions to a typical week
suggeststhatover73%ofrecreationaltripscouldbetakenonaweekend. Commutingtripsare likelytobespread
more evenly across the entire week. Data also suggests that recreational use of SkyPath could be highest from
morning tomidday,whilstcommuting tripscould be spread somewhat more evenly throughout thedaywith large
proportionsexpectingtouseSkyPathduringthetraditionalmorningrushhourperiods.
ApproachtoSkyPath:
RespondentswereaskedwhichmethodtheymightusetoapproachSkyPath.On39%ofallrecreationaltrips,users
believetheywoulddriveclosetotheHarbourBridgeandparkinlocalareas,whilstoncommutingtripsthisproportion
isjustunder aquarter.Onapproximately77%ofallcommuting tripsand 62% ofallrecreational trips,surveydata
indicatesthatSkyPathwouldbeapproachedbyothermeans.
Of those who would drive to and attempt to park near SkyPath, sizeable proportions would park in the areas
surroundingtheSouthernandNorthernlandingsofSkyPath.Resultsalsoshowclearpreferencesbyresidentstothe
NorthandSouthof theHarbourBridge.Northernresidentsunsurprisinglywould favourparkingareas inNorthcote
PointandTakapuna,whilstSouthernresidentswould favour theWesthaven,SaintMarys Bay/HerneBay,Wynyard
QuarterandCBDareas.
Afollowupquestionwasaskedoftheproportionofrespondentswhohadindicatedtodrivecloseandparkin local
areasabout
the
changes
in
their
behaviour
if
no
local
parking
was
available.
The
majority
of
these
users
indicated
that
theymightstilluseSkyPath,whilst39%ofthesecommutersand35%oftheserecreationalusersindicatedtheywould
switchtopublictransportinsteadofusingtheirownvehicletogettoSkyPath.
InrelationtopossibleSouthernroutesleadingtoandfromSkyPath,whilstlargeproportionsofrespondentsindicated
thattheywouldbetravellingthroughWesthaven,Southernresidentsindicatedastrongerlikelihoodtopassthrough
SaintMarysBay/HerneBayareasthanrespondentsfromtheNorth.
Busand
shuttle
use:
Asked about their propensity to use new bus services connecting to SkyPath, more than 50% of both commuters
recreationalusers indicatedsome likelihoodofdoingso.Asimilarresultwasfound inrelationtotheuseofregular
shuttlesfromtheCBDandWynyardQuarter.
NorthernLinkpathway:
Respondents were asked about their use preferences in relation to an additional Northern Link path connecting
SkyPath to Takapuna as an alternative to going through Northcote areas. The question was designed to get an
indicationof
apossible
effect
on
the
numbers
coming
through
local
areas.
Whilst
large
proportions
of
respondents
felt
unsure at this point in time, sizeable proportions are likely to useboth the NorthernLink pathway as well as local
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
5/45
20 June 2014 5 of 45
Northcotestreets(31%ofcommutersand25%ofrecreationalusers).Duetothelargeproportionsthatwereunsure
atthispointintimeweadvisethatresultstothesemorehypotheticalquestionsbetreatedasindicativeonly.
AnotherscenariowastestedwhichintroducedtheNorthernLinkastheonlywaytoaccessSkyPathfromthenorth.If
this were thecase,a thirdofall commutersandjustunder40% of recreationalusers indicated theywould be less
likelytouseSkyPath.Again,largeproportionswereunsureatthispointintimeandoverallweadvisethatresultsto
thesemorehypotheticalquestionsbetreatedasindicativeonly.
Otherproducts/experiences:
InterestinhiringbikestocrossSkyPathishealthy(34%ofallrespondentsexpressedinterestindoingso).Themajority
ofthosewhoareinterestedwouldprefertohavethisserviceavailableateitherentrancetoSkyPath.Whilstoverall,
interest in both additional bridge climbs and bungyjumps seems to be relatively limited, given the nicheproduct
natureofthebridgeclimbandbungyjumptherecouldbeasizeableincreaseindemandfortheseaddonexperiences
due
to
the
possible
numbers
of
users
coming
through.
There
are
also
opportunities
to
market
these
addon
experiencestotheyoungeragegroupingsinparticular.
DemandProjections:
Thepurposeofthe2014researchwastodetermine likelyuseofSkyPathacrossseasons,daysandtimeperiods,as
wellasaccessroutesasmuchaspossible. Patternsofuseasidentifiedby2014surveyrespondentshavebeenapplied
totheprojectedtripnumbersasdeterminedinthe2013research.
The2013
projection
model
developed
for
SkyPath
concluded
with
aforecast
of
112,811
trips
by
international
and
domesticvisitorsinyear1ofoperation,withthepotentialtoincreaseto222,517byyear10andthereafter.
Regarding local patronage, the 2013 calculations resulted in a forecast of 668,573 trips by Auckland resident
recreationalandcommuterusersinyear1ofoperation,withthepotentialtoincreaseto1,674,157byyear10.The
combinedtotaldemandprojectionforSkyPathistherefore781,384tripsinyear1ofoperation,withthepotentialto
riseto2,136,513by2034.
Detailedtabulations
on
the
use
patterns
from
2014
data
by
the
main
user
groupings
have
been
provided
in
section
4
ofthisreport.
Asmentionedabove,the2014resultsshowclearhighuseperiodsthroughouttheyear,weekandday.Therespective
highuseperiodsareduringsummer,onweekends,andduring latemorningtomidday.Given the likelihoodof the
summerseasontobethebusiestperiod,therearelikelytobe13weekendsayearduringwhichalargenumberofthe
trips over SkyPath could occur. The larger numbers of SkyPath users during summer weekends are driven by a
relatively largeproportionofrecreationaluserswhoareexpectedtovisitSkyPathduringasummerweekend(73%)
basedon
the
demand
estimates.
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
6/45
20 June 2014 6 of 45
2. BackgroundTheSkyPathconceptwasdevelopedbytheAucklandHarbourBridgePathwayTrust(theTrust)tocloseacriticalgap
in Aucklands cycling and walking network. During the second half of 2013, Angus & Associates was engaged by
AucklandCounciltoprovideareviewofpreviouspatronageforecastsandotherdocumentation,aswellastoconduct
additionalprimaryresearchintopotentialusergroupings. Primaryresearchconsideredthedifferentaspectsofuse,
aswellasthedevelopmentofademandprojectionmodelestimatingpotentialtripsforthefirst20yearsofoperation.
Thedemandprojectionmodelwasbasedonconservativeassumptionsandincludedtotalyearlypatronageestimates
forthemainmarketsegments,namelydomesticandinternationalvisitorstoAuckland,aswellasAucklandresidents.
Theprojectionmodelexcludedanumberofpotentialsmallermarketsegments,suchascruiseshipsandtourgroups,
aswellasspecificchildvisitation(onlyadultsabovetheageof15wereincludedinthesurvey).
Subsequenttothisfirstroundofresearch,AucklandCouncilandtheTrustaskedAngus&Associatestorefinethetotal
estimatesfurther inordertoderivemoreclarityaboutspecificvariations indemandoverthecourseoftheyear,a
typicalweekandatypicalday/timeforplanningpurposes.Tothisendanotherroundofprimaryquantitativeresearch
wasconductedwithAucklandresidents.Thisreportoutlinesthefindingsofthissecondresearchproject.
Pleasenotethatsinceinthisreportwewilloftenrefertofromtheearlierresearchundertakenin2013,forthesakeof
brevitywewillrefertothe2013researchandthecurrent2014researchrespectively.
Building
upon
the
2013
research
in
relation
to
potential
SkyPath
patronage
numbers
and
characteristics,
the
objectivesofthecurrentprojectwere:
firstly, toderive furtherunderstandingandmorecertaintysurrounding theupperbandofpatronageestimatesduringpotentialpeaktimesanddays;and,
secondly,toderiveanunderstandingofhowmanypeoplemightcomethroughareas immediatelytothenorthandsouthofSkyPathandlocalstreetsleadingtoandfrom SkyPath(i.e.Northcote,Westhaven,SaintMarysBay).
Thisadditional
research
was
also
used
to
address
additional
topics
and
issues
that
were
of
interest
to
Council,
the
TrustandotherstakeholdersinrelationtoSkyPathprojectdevelopment.
3. MethodologyPrimary quantitative research was conducted with a sample of Auckland residents through an online panel survey
similartothatemployedforthe2013research.The2014researchhoweverexcludedthedomesticandinternational
visitormarkets,sinceAucklandresidentswillconstitutethelargestgroupofthoseusingSkyPathforbothrecreational
andcommuting
purposes.
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
7/45
20 June 2014 7 of 45
For the online survey we repeated the local resident sample and drew a robust sample of n=800 respondents,
comprising n=400 Auckland residents from potential commuter suburbs (inner areas within a 10km radius of the
Harbour Bridge) and n=400 wider Auckland residents (outer areas) to address both potential recreational AND
commuter use. The sample was drawn from New Zealands largest multisource consumer panel, SmileCity, which
providesarepresentativecrosssectionoftheNewZealandpopulation,recruitedusingavarietyofmediabothonand
offline.Thisapproachensuresthattheresultsaredirectlycomparabletopreviousfindings.
The2013researchresulted inasetof totalpatronageestimates towhich findingsof the2014researchhavebeen
applied. Thishasenabledustoderiveestimatesofuseacrossseasons,daysoftheweekandtimesthroughoutthe
day.Themethodologyandcorrespondinganalysisisoutlinedinsection5ofthisreport.
Theresearchapproachrecognisedfourmajorusergroups,potentiallymakingupthebulkofdemandfortheSkyPath
internationalanddomesticvisitors toAuckland,aswellasAucklandresidentrecreationalusersandcommuters (As
mentionedabove
there
are
other
potential
user
groups
possibly
generating
demand
for
the
SkyPath,
such
as
school
classes, cruise visitors, social groups etc., which are however outside the scope of the current assessment). The
visitorsincludedinthisassessmentaredomesticandinternationalholidayvisitorstoAuckland,aswellasthosewho
come to visit friends and relatives (VFR). The visitor market is further segmented into day and overnight visitors.
Auckland residents were assumed to use SkyPath as either (or both) commuters and recreational users, with each
group exhibiting specific behaviour and use of SkyPath. The researchalso included an analysis of inner vs. outer
suburbs,examiningthepotentialdifferencesofresidents livingclosertheHarbourBridge(withina10kmradius)vs.
residentsfromfurtherawaywithintheAucklandregion.
4. Survey Findings4.1.Comparisonswithprevious(2013)researchfindings
Both2013and2014surveysmeasuredthelevelofinterestinSkyPathaswellasthepropensity/likelihoodtouse/visit
SkyPath.The2013resultswereusedasinputtothedemandprojectionmodelutilisingtheproportionofthesample
whoindicated
to
be
Very
Likely
to
use
SkyPath
for
recreation
and/or
commuting.
The
current
(2014)
research
uses
thepreviousdemandestimatesinthecalculationofusebythedifferenttimeperiodsasmentionedabove.
A comparison of the 2013 and 2014 results shows very similar levels of interest and use propensity as provided
belowandanydifferencesarewellwithinthemarginoferror.Thismeansthatthecurrentresultsareapplicableto
thenumbersforecastwiththe2013demandmodel.
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
8/45
20 June 2014 8 of 45
Table1Levelofinterest
Veryinterested Quiteinterested Notveryinterested Notinterestedat
all
Notsure
2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014
Recreationaluse 32% 36% 37% 35% 16% 13% 11% 13% 4% 3%
Commuting 17% 18% 17% 19% 27% 18% 32% 38% 6% 6%
Table2Propensitytouse
Verylikely Quitelikely Notverylikely Notlikelyatall Notsure
2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014
Recreationaluse 18% 19% 34% 27% 20% 24% 23% 26% 5% 4%
Commuting 6% 7% 12% 10% 23% 23% 54% 54% 5% 6%
4.2.CurrentcommutingmethodRespondents who indicated they would use SkyPath for commuting were asked by which methods they currently
commutetoandfromtheirplaceofworkorstudy.Whilstmotorvehiclesareunsurprisinglythemostcommonformof
commuter transport, there are distinct variations in the modes of transport favoured by residents of innerand
outer suburbs. Please note that this was a multichoice question to explore popular modes of commuting, hence
proportionsinfigure1dontaddto100%.
Figure1
4.3. SeasonaluseThesurveyalsoincludedasetofquestionsaskingrespondentstoestimatetheiruseofSkyPath(basedonproportions
ofusetotallingto100%).Thissetofquestionswasaskedinrelationtotheseasons,weeklyuse,timeofday,aswellas
themethod/modeoftransporttoapproachSkyPath.
Most Common Methods to Commute by Auckland Region (Grouped)
Base - Commuting User (Group)
AucklandRegion(Grouped) InnerSuburbs OuterSuburbs
MostCommonMethodstoCommute
Walk/jog/
run
Bicycle
Bycar/ot
hermotor
vehicle
Bybus
Bytrain
Byferry
Other
Idon't
cu
rrentycom
mute/NA
%(MostCommonMethodstoCommute)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
26%
9%
59%
41%
8%4%
2%
9%
16%
7%
65%
23%
14%
4% 2%
13%
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
9/45
20 June 2014 9 of 45
Theresultssuggestthat,onaverage,40%ofcommuterand45%ofrecreationaltripscouldbeundertakenduringthe
summermonths,whilstthewinterperiodisexpectedtorepresentthelowseasonwithasignificantlysmallernumber
oftripsforbothcommuting(16%)andrecreationalpurposes(12%).
PleasenotethatatripreferstoonetripoverSkyPath.Areturnjourneycomprisestwotrips.
Figure2
4.4. WeeklyuseApplyingtheproportionstoatypicalweeksuggeststhatover73%ofrecreationaltripscouldbetakenonaweekend.
Commutingtrips
are
likely
to
be
spread
more
evenly
across
the
entire
week.
Regarding
the
commuting
use
we
need
toemphasisethatthesurveydefinedcommutingforavarietyofpurposessuchaswork,aswellaseducation.Itisalso
important to bear in mind that a great variety of work/job types and professions will be present in the sample of
respondents.Thismeansforexamplethatcommutersfromthehospitality,retailandotherserviceindustriesarestill
likelycommutingtoworkonweekends.
Figure3
Expected Average Use of SkyPath by Season
Base - Average Seasonal Use - All (Measures)
SeasonalUse All(across) Winter Spring Summer Autumn
SeasonalUse All(down)Commuting Recreation
%(SeasonalUse
All(across))
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
16%12%
24%
23%
40%45%
20% 21%
TotalResponses
Expected Average Use of SkyPath Day of the Week
Base - Daily Use - All (Measures)
DailyUse
All
(down) Recreation Commuting
DailyUse All(across)Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
%(DailyUse
All(across))
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
5% 5% 5% 5% 7%
38%
35%
11% 11% 12%
12%13%
22%
19%
TotalResponses
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
10/45
20 June 2014 10 of 45
4.5. PeaktimesSurveydataalsoindicatesthattimeofuseduringatypicaldaycouldalsovarybetweenthedifferentusertypes.Data
suggeststhatrecreationaluseofSkyPathcouldbehighestfromlatemorningtomidday,whilstcommutingtripscould
be spread somewhat more evenly throughout the day, with large proportions expected to use SkyPath during the
traditionalmorningrushhourperiod.Figure4showstripsinbothdirections.
Figure4
4.6. SkyPathApproachARespondentswereaskedwhichmethodtheymightusetoapproachSkyPath.Thepurposeofthisquestionwastogain
a better understanding of what mode of transport people might use to access SkyPath in an unconstrained (i.e.
parking) situation. The following question thengaugeswhat alternativemode of transport might beused by those
people who would try to park close, if local car parking was restricted. The way by which potential SkyPath users
believe theywouldget to/approach theHarbourBridgevaries insome respectwithin thedifferentusergroups,as
wellasbyareaofresidence.
On39%ofallrecreationaltrips,usersbelievetheywoulddriveclosetotheHarbourBridgeandpark in localareas,
whilstoncommutingtripsthisproportion isjustunderaquarter.Onapproximately77%ofallcommutingtripsand
62%ofallrecreationaltrips,surveydataindicatesthatSkyPathwouldbeapproachedbyothermeans.
InnerarearesidentshaveindicatedthattheyarealsomorelikelytowalkorcycledirectlyfromhometocrossSkyPath.
Expected Average Use of SkyPath by Time of Day
Base - Average Use by Time - All (Measures)
UsebyTime All(down) Commuting Recreation
UsebyTime All(across)
Earlymorning
before6am
Between
6amand
7am
Between
7amand
8am
Between
8amand
9am
Between
9amand
12noon
Between
12noon
and3pm
Between
3pmand
4pm
Between
4pmand
5pm
Between
5pmand
6pm
Between
6pmand
7pm
After7pm
untillate
%(UsebyTime
A
ll(across))
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
4%
8%
15%12%
16%
12%
5% 7%
10%
6% 6%3%
4% 4% 3%
28% 29%
8%6% 6%
3%6%
TotalResponses
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
11/45
20 June 2014 11 of 45
Figure5
Figure6
Figure7
Expected Transport Mode Used to Access SkyPath by User Type (Car Parking Not Restricted)
Base - Average Use by Method - All (Measures)
UsebyMethod All(across) forwalk/cyclefromhometoSkypath
driveascloseaspossibletoSkyPath
drivetocentralparkinghubs
takeabus/trainascloseaspossible
useaferrycloseby
UsebyMethod All(down)Commuting Recreation
%(UsebyMethod
All(across))
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
22%17%
23% 39%
16%
13%
30%25%
9% 7%
TotalResponses
Expected Transport Mode Used to Access SkyPath by Commuting Users (Car Parking Not Restricted)
Base - Commuting (Use by Method - All (down)) and Use by Method - All (Measures)
UsebyMethod All(across) forwalk/cyclefromhometoSkypath
driveascloseaspossibletoSkyPath
drivetocentralparkinghubs
takeabus/trainascloseaspossible
useaferrycloseby
AucklandRegion(Grouped)InnerSuburbs OuterSuburbs
%(UsebyMethod
All(across))
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
27%
13%
20%
27%
15%
17%
29%32%
8% 11%
TotalResponses
Expected Transport Mode Used to Access SkyPath by Recreational Users (Car Parking Not Restricted)
Base - Recreation (Use by Method - All (down)) and Use by Method - All (Measures)
Useby
Method
All
(across)
forwalk/cyclefromhometoSkypath
driveascloseaspossibletoSkyPath
drivetocentralparkinghubs
takeabus/trainascloseaspossible
useaferrycloseby
AucklandRegion(Grouped)InnerSuburbs OuterSuburbs
%(UsebyMethod
All(across))
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
24%
8%
37%
42%
10%
16%
24%26%
8%
TotalResponses
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
12/45
20 June 2014 12 of 45
4.7. SkyPathApproachBAfollowupquestionwasaskedoftheproportionofrespondentswhohadindicatedtodrivecloseandparkin local
areasaboutthechangesintheirbehaviourifnolocalparkingwasavailable.Themajorityoftheseusersindicatedthat
theymightstilluseSkyPath,whilst39%ofthesecommutersand35%oftheserecreationalusersindicatedtheywould
switchtopublictransportinsteadofusingtheirownvehicletogettoSkyPath.
Tosummarise inrelationtothefiguresshownin4.6SkyPathApproachA,thismeansthat39%ofrecreationalusers
believe that they woulddriveclose to theAuckland HarbourBridge andpark in local areas,however 35%of these
respondents,uponconsideringascenariowithrestrictedlocalparking,areexpectedtousepublictransportinstead.
Likewise,23%ofcommuterusersbelievethattheywoulddriveclosetotheAucklandHarbourBridgeandparkinlocal
areas,however39%oftheseareexpectedtoswitchtopublictransportiflocalparkingwasunavailable.
Figure8
4.8. LikelyparkingareasThoserespondentswhoindicatedtheywouldparknearSkyPathwerepresentedwithamapoflocalareasandasked
where they are likely to park. Results suggest that sizeable proportions would park in the areas surrounding the
SouthernandNorthernlandingsofSkyPath.ResultsalsoshowclearpreferencesbyNorthernvs.Southernresidents.
PleasenotethatforthisanalysisallresidentsfromNorthShoreCityandRodneyinthesamplewereincludedasthe
Northerngroup,i.e.northoftheHarbourBridge,whilstallotherAucklandresidentsinthesamplewereclassifiedas
theSoutherngroup.
Alternative Preferred Option if No Parking AvailableSkyPath2014
NoParkingAvailable AlternativePreferredOption Stilldrivetowardsandfindclosestpark
Useothertransportoptionse.g.publictransport
WouldnotusetheSkyPathatall(orwoulduseitlessoften)
Dontknow
Group
RecreationalUser CommutingUser
%(NoParkingAvailable
Alterna
tivePreferredOption)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
36% 38%
35%39%
23%17%
6% 6%
TotalResponses
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
13/45
20 June 2014 13 of 45
Figure9
Figure10
Figure11
Area Most Likely to Park In by North vs South Residents
NorthvsSouthResidents NorthernResidents SouthernResidents
CommutingMethods
1.Takapuna
area
2.Northcote
Pointarea
3.W
iderNorthcote/Birkenhead
area
4.W
esthavenarea
5.Saint
Marys
Bay/HerneBay
area
6.Wynyard
Quarter
7.CBD
8.Other
%
100
90
80
70
6050
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
6050
40
30
20
10
0
36%
75%
12% 13% 8% 7% 6%2%
10%
21%
5%
50%
40%
27%33%
2%
AutobaseOn
Area Most Likely to Park In by North vs South Residents (Commuters)
Base - Area Most Likely to Park Vehicle - Commuting (Commuting Methods Axes)
NorthvsSouthResidents NorthernResidents SouthernResidents
CommutingMethods
1.Tak
apunaarea
2.No
rthcotePoint
area
3.W
iderNorthcote/Birkenhead
area
4.W
esthaven
area
5.Sai
ntMarysBay/Herne
Bayarea
6.Wynyard
Quarter
7.CB
D
8.Oth
er
%
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
41%
56%
12% 12%6% 6% 3% 3%
13%20%
7%
37% 36%
15%
41%
2%
AutobaseOn
Area Most Likely to Park In by North vs South Residents (Recreational Users)
Base - Area Most Likely to Park Vehicle - Recreation (Commuting Methods Axes)
NorthvsSouthResidents NorthernResidents SouthernResidents
Commuting
Methods
1.Takapuna
area
2.Northcote
Pointarea
3.W
iderNorthcote/Birkenhead
area
4.W
esthavenarea
5.Saint
Marys
Bay/HerneBay
area
6.Wynyard
Quarter
7.CBD
8.Other
%
100
9080
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
9080
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
34%
77%
10% 10% 9%5% 6%
1%9%
19%
3%
49%
38%
25%31%
1%
AutobaseOn
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
14/45
20 June 2014 14 of 45
4.9. LikelihoodofbusandshuttleuseDespiteoftheirmodeoftransporttoSkyPath,whenaskedabouttheirpropensitytousenewbusservicesconnecting
toSkyPath,more than50%ofallrecreationalandcommuterusers indicatedsome likelihoodofdoingso.Asimilar
resultwasfoundinrelationtotheuseofregularshuttlesfromtheCBDandWynyardQuarter.
Figure12
Figure13
4.10.PreferenceinrelationtoNorthernLinkpathwayRespondents were asked about their use preferences in relation to an additional Northern Link path connecting
SkyPath to Takapuna as an alternative to travelling on local roads through Northcote areas. The question was
designedtogetanindicationofapossibleeffectonthenumberscomingthroughlocalareas.Whilstlargeproportions
ofrespondentsfeltunsureatthispointintime,sizeableproportionsarelikelytouseboththeNorthernLinkpathway
Propensity to Use Bus Services
PropensitytoUse Verylikely Quitelikely Quiteunlikely Veryunlikely Don'tknow
PropensitytoUseAxesRecreation Commuting
%(Propens
itytoUse)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
15% 17%
39% 34%
17%17%
15%13%
14%19%
TotalResponses
Propensity to Use Shuttle Services
Shuttle
Services Very
likely Quite
likely Quite
unlikely Very
unlikely Don't
know
ShuttleServicesAxesRecreation ShuttleServices Commuting ShuttleServices
%(ShuttleServices)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
14% 14%
36% 36%
15% 17%
20% 16%
15% 17%
TotalResponses
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
15/45
20 June 2014 15 of 45
as well as local Northcote streets. Large proportions were unsure at this point in time and overall we advise that
resultstothesemorehypotheticalquestionsbetreatedasindicativeonly.
Figure14
AnotherscenariowastestedwhichintroducedtheNorthernLinkastheonlywaytoaccessSkyPathfromthenorth.If
thiswerethecase,justunder40%ofrecreationalusersandathirdofcommutersindicatedtheywouldbelesslikely
touseSkyPath.Again,largeproportionswereunsureatthispointintimeandoverallweadvisethatresultstothese
morehypotheticalquestionsbetreatedasindicativeonly.
Figure15
Preference for SkyPath Access with Addition of Northern Link
SkyPath2014
NorthenLinkPreference Prefertocycle/walkexclusivelyalongthisadditionalpath
Prefertocycle/walkexclusivelythroughNorthcote
WouldprobablyusebothNorthernLinkandNorthcoteroads
Dontknow
NorthenLinkPreferenceAxes
Recreation Commuting
%(NorthenLinkPreference)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
17%22%
5%
5%
25%
31%
52%
42%
TotalResponses
Propensity to Use Northern Link
UseNorthernLink Verylikely Quitelikely Quiteunlikely Veryunlikely Don'tknow
UseNorthernLinkAxesRecreation Commuting
%(UseNorthernLink)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
9% 11%
29%31%
19%18%
19% 16%
23% 23%
TotalResponses
5%
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
16/45
20 June 2014 16 of 45
4.11.SouthernroutesInrelationtopossibleSouthernroutesleadingtoandfromSkyPath,whilstlargeproportionsofrespondentsindicated
thattheywouldbetravellingthroughWesthaven,Southernresidentsindicatedastrongerlikelihoodtopassthrough
SaintMarysBay/HerneBayareasthanrespondentsfromtheNorth.
Figure16
Figure17
Southern Direction Most Likely to Take by North vs South Residents
SouthernDirection ThroughWesthaventowardsCBDorotherareas ThroughSaintMarysBay/HerneBaytowardsPonsonby,CBDetc Dontknow Neither
NorthvsSouthResidentsNorthernResidents SouthernResidents
%
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
39% 36%
11%26%
33%
33%
17%
TotalResponses
Southern Direction Most Likely to Take by North vs South Residents (Commuters)
Base - Southern Direction Most Likely to Take to and From the SkyPath - Commuting (Southern Direction Axes)
SouthernDirection ThroughWesthaventowardsCBDorotherareas ThroughSaintMarysBay/HerneBaytowardsPonsonby,CBDetc Dontknow
NorthvsSouthResidents
NorthernResidents Southern
Residents
%(SouthernDirection)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
44%33%
14%28%
42% 39%
TotalResponses
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
17/45
20 June 2014 17 of 45
Figure18
4.12.Cycle/walkcombinationforrecreationalusersRecreationalcycleuserswereaskedabouttheirlikelihoodofcyclingtoSkyPathbutthenwalkingacrossitduetothe
inclineof theHarbourBridge.Again,results toahypotheticalquestionof this typeshouldbeviewedwithcaution,
howeveronaveragearound35%ofrecreationalcyclistsindicatedtheywerelikelytowalkSkyPath.
Figure19
Southern Direction Most Likely to Take by North vs South Residents (Recreational Users)
Base - Southern Direction Most Likely to Take to and From the SkyPath - Recreation (Southern Direction Axes)
SouthernDirection ThroughWesthaventowardsCBDorotherareas ThroughSaintMarysBay/HerneBaytowardsPonsonby,CBDetc Neither Dontknow
NorthvsSouthResidentsNorthernResidents SouthernResidents
%
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
36% 38%
8%
24%
29%
8%
26% 30%
TotalResponses
Propensity to Leave Bicyle at Entrance and Walk SkyPath (Recreational Cycle Users)
Base - Recreational User (Group) and I would cycle (SkyPath Recreation Use)
PropensitytoLeaveBicyleatEntranceandWalkSkyPath(Recreation) Verylikely Quitelikely Quiteunlikely Veryunlikely Don'tknow
AucklandRegion(Grouped)InnerSuburbs OuterSuburbs
(PropensitytoLeave
BicyleatEntranceandWalkSkyPath(Recreation))
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10% 9%
29%
23%
24%
20%
27%
32%
9%15%
TotalResponses
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
18/45
20 June 2014 18 of 45
4.13. InterestinbicyclerentalsInterestinhiringbikestocrossSkyPathishealthy(34%ofallrespondentsexpressedinterestindoingso).Themajority
ofthosewhoare interestedwouldprefertohavethisserviceavailableattheentrancetoSkyPath,whilstthereare
alsogoodopportunitiestoofferthisservicefromTakapuna,theCBD/BritomartandWynyardQuarter.
Figure20
Figure21
Interest in Hiring Bicycle to Cycle the SkyPath
Interested inHiringBicycletoCycletheSkyPath Y es N o
NorthvsSouthResidentsTotal(Responses)%
(InterestedinHiringBicy
cletoCycletheSkyPath)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
34%
66%
TotalResponses
Preferred Location for Hiring Bicycle by North vs South Residents
NorthvsSouthResidents NorthernResidents SouthernResidents
PreferredLocationforHiringBicycle
a.City
Centrearea
(i.e.Britom
art)
b.Wynyard
Quarterarea
onthe
Waterfront
c.Takapuna
areaon
theNorth
Shore
d.Entrance/access
areasto
theSkyPath
closeto
theBridge
Dontknow
%(PreferredLocationforHiringBicycle)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
9% 6%
45%
34%
6%
26% 24%
1%
40%
9%
AutobaseOn
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
19/45
20 June 2014 19 of 45
4.14. InterestinaddonexperiencesWhilst overall, interest in both additional bridge climbs and bungyjumps seems to be relatively limited, given the
nicheproduct nature of thebridge climb andbungyjump there couldbea sizeable increase indemand for these
addon experiences due to the possible numbers of users coming through. There are also opportunities to market
theseaddonexperiencestotheyoungeragegroupingsinparticular.
Figure22
Figure23
Interest in Additional Guided Bridge ClimbSkyPath2014
InterestinAdditionalGuidedTrip/ClimbVeryinterested Quiteinterested Notveryinterested Notinterestedatall Notsure
%
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
4%
13%
28%
46%
9%
TotalResponses
Interest in Additional Guided Bridge Climb by Age GroupSkyPath2014
Age(SmallGrouped)
1524years 2539years 4049years 5064years 65years+
%
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
04%
7%
17%15%
14%8%
5%
37%
26%
20% 31%
24%
34%
41%
54%
50%
64%
8%12% 10%
9% 7%
TotalResponses
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
20/45
20 June 2014 20 of 45
Figure24
Figure25
Interest in Additional Bungy Jump off the Bridge
InterestinAdditionalBunjyJumpofftheBridgeVeryinterested Quiteinterested Notveryinterested Notinterestedatall Notsure
%
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
4%
13%
19%
56%
7%
Interest in Additional Bungy Jump off the Bridge by Age Group
InterestinAdditionalBunjyJumpofftheBridge Veryinterested Quiteinterested Notveryinterested Notinterestedatall Notsure
Age(SmallGrouped)1524years 2539years 4049years 5064years 65years+
%(InterestinAdd
itionalBunjyJumpofftheBridge)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10%6%
26%
17%
10%6%
24%
23%
14% 22%
35%
45%
64%65%
93%
5%10% 10%
6%
TotalResponses
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
21/45
20 June 2014 21 of 45
5.Application to Demand Projection ModelThepurposeofthe2014researchwastodetermine likelyuseofSkyPathacrossseasons,daysandtimeperiods,as
wellasroutesasmuchaspossible. Patternsofuseasidentifiedby2014surveyrespondentshavebeenappliedtothe
projectedtripnumbersasdeterminedinthe2013research.
The2013 projectionmodeldeveloped forSkyPathconcludedwith a forecastof112,811 tripsby internationaland
domestic visitors in year 1 of operation, with the potential to increase to 222,517 by year 10 and thereafter.
Regardinglocalpatronage,thecalculationsresultedinaforecastof668,573tripsbyAucklandresidentrecreational
andcommuterusers inyear1ofoperation,withthepotential to increaseto1,674,157byyear10.Thecombined
totaldemandprojectionforSkyPath istherefore781,384trips inyear1ofoperation,withthepotentialtoriseto
2,136,513by2034.
Demandprojectionswerebuiltonconservativemeasuresandassumptions,withsignificantupside indicatedbythe
survey findings, as well as the fact that some potential user groups were excluded from the 2013 projections. The
survey results pointed to a very positive reception of SkyPath in terms of expressed interest and in verbatim
comment.Adetailedoutlineofthedemandprojectionmodel, includingmeasuresandassumptionscanbefound in
the2013researchreportpreparedforAucklandCouncil.
The current analysis estimates trip numbers for periods of use, starting with broad seasonal use followed by
weekly/dailyuse
and
approximate
times
of
use
on
agiven
day.
Given
the
complexity
of
the
data,
this
report
presents
theresultingestimatesoftripnumbersfortwokeyyearsonly,thesebeingyear1andyear5.
5.1.Recreational&CommuterPatronageProportionsTable 3overleaf summarises the proportionaluse/patronage of SkyPath from2014surveydata by therecreational
andcommutingusergroupsbyseason,weekday,timeofday,aswellas modeofapproach.Theresultsshowclear
peaksand
troughs.
Summer
represents
the
peak
season,
with
45%
of
recreational
trips
and
40%
of
commuter
trips
likelytobeundertaken,whilstthewintermonthscouldgenerate12%ofrecreationaltripsand16%ofcommutertrips.
Asseeninsection3ofthisreport,alargeproportionoftripswillbeundertakenduringweekends,aswellasduring
latemorningandmidday.
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
22/45
20 June 2014 22 of 45
Table3ResidentUseProportions
RecreationalUse: CommuterUse:
Useproportion: Useproportion:
PerAnnum: 100% 100%
Winter
Quarter
12%
16%
SpringQuarter 23% 24%
SummerQuarter 45% 40%
AutumnQuarter 21% 20%
Weekday: Useproportion: Useproportion:
Monday 5% 11%
Tuesday 5% 11%
Wednesday 5% 12%
Thursday 5% 12%
Friday 7% 13%
Saturday 38% 22%
Sunday 35% 19%
Tripsbytime: Useproportion: Useproportion:
Before6am 3% 4%
6am7am 4% 8%
7am8am 4% 15%
8am9am 3% 12%
9am10pm* 9% 5%
10am11pm* 9% 5%
11am12pm* 9% 5%
12pm1pm* 10% 4%
1pm2pm*
10%
4%
2pm3pm* 10% 4%
3pm4pm 8% 5%
4pm5pm 6% 7%
5pm6pm 6% 10%
6pm7pm 3% 6%
After7pm 6% 6%
Approach: Useproportion: Useproportion:
Walk/Cycle 17% 22%
Parknear 39% 23%
Centralparking
hubs
13%
16%
Bus/Train 25% 30%
Ferry 7% 9%
*Pleasenotethatthesurveyquestionprovided3hourtimeslotsfrom9amto12amand12pmto3pm.Forillustrative
purposesthesehavebeensplitevenlyacrosstherespectivehours.
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
23/45
20 June 2014 23 of 45
5.2. Domestic&InternationalVisitorPatronageThe2014researchexcludednewprimaryresearch intothe(domesticand international)visitormarkets. The2013
research found that the majority of users would come from the Auckland population and it was considered that
informedassumptionscouldbemade inrelationtoapproximateseasonalvariations intripsmadebyvisitorstothe
region.
OftheofficialNewZealandtourismdatasets,theCommercialAccommodationMonitor(CAM)producedbyStatistics
NewZealandcurrentlyprovidesthebestregionalestimatesofseasonalityinthedomesticandinternationalmarkets.
EventhoughtheCAMmeasuresonlyguestnightsspent incommercialaccommodationestablishments(ofacertain
sizeandexcludingsmallerestablishmentsandprivateaccommodation), itstillprovidesan indicationofvariations in
tourismactivitythroughouttheyear.
TheseasonalpeaksandtroughsinAucklandsvisitormarketscanbeseeninthefollowingchart:
Figure26
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
5,000,000
GUESTNIGHTS
YEARENDING
COMMERCIALACCOMMODATIONMONITOR,AUCKLANDRTO,BYVISITORORIGIN
DOMESTICGUESTNIGHTS INTERNATIONALGUESTNIGHTS TOTALGUESTNIGHTS
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
24/45
20 June 2014 24 of 45
Calculating the likelyseasonalityofuseofSkyPathbasedonCAMdata for the latestfullyear (2013),results in the
followingassumptions:
Table4:SeasonalUseofSkyPathbyDomesticandInternationalVisitors(ModelledUsingCAMdata)
DomesticSeasonality InternationalSeasonality TotalSeasonality
WinterQuarter 21% 17% 19%
SpringQuarter
24%
23%
23%
SummerQuarter 32% 35% 33%
AutumnQuarter 24% 25% 25%
Application of these proportions to the visitorgenerated trips projected in the 2013 SkyPath research shows the
followingseasonalvisitorestimatesforyears1andyear5respectively.Pleasenotethatthenumbersshownarefor
tripnumbers(includingreturntrips)whicharederivedfrom2013surveyfindings(55%ofinternationalvisitorswould
doareturntripand29%ofdomesticvisitorswoulddoareturntrip).
Table5:
Visitor
Trips
Modelled
at
Year
1and
5
Year1 Domestic International Total
PerAnnum 34,526 133,372 167,898
Winter 7,084 22,861 29,945
Spring 8,158 30,049 38,207
Summer 10,928 46,643 57,571
Autumn 8,356 33,819 42,175
Year5
PerAnnum 21,594 226,569 248,163
Winter 4,431 38,836 43,267
Spring
5,102
51,047
56,149
Summer 6,835 79,236 86,071
Autumn 5,226 57,451 62,677
Dividingthenumberoftripsbydaysperseason(91.25days)resultsinthefollowingdailynumbersperseason:
Table6DailyNumbersbySeason Visitors
Year1 Domestic International Total
PerDay
Winter 78 251 328
Spring 89 329 419
Summer 120 511 631
Autumn
92
371
462
Year5 Domestic International Total
PerDay
Winter 49 426 474
Spring 56 559 615
Summer 75 868 943
Autumn 57 630 687
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
25/45
20 June 2014 25 of 45
ApplyingafurtherassumptionthatvisitorpatronageofSkyPathwillvarybyweekdayand/orweekendresultedinthe
followingTable7.Implicitintheproportionsprovidedistheassumptionthatdomesticvisitorscouldexhibitthesame
orsimilarpatternsofusethanthelocalrecreationaluser,whilstalackofmorespecificpotentialusepatternsof
internationalvisitorscausedustospreadthesetripsevenlyacrossanaverageweek.
Table7WeekdayProportions Visitors
Domestic International
Weekday:
Monday 5% 14%
Tuesday 5% 14%
Wednesday 5% 14%
Thursday 5% 14%
Friday 7% 14%
Saturday 38% 14%
Sunday 35% 14%
Table8andTable9showtheappliedvisitortripsperweekbyseasonforyear1andyear5respectively.Table10
showsthesumtotalforbothvisitorgroupings.
Table8WeeklyNumbersbySeason Visitors
VisitorTrips Winter Spring Summer Autumn VisitorTrips Winter Spring Summer Autumn
Year1
Domestic Totals: Totals: Totals: Totals:
Year1
International Totals: Totals: Totals: Totals:
PerSeason: 7,084 8,158 10,928 8,356 PerSeason: 22,861 30,049 46,643 33,819
Weekly
visitor
numbersduring
the13
weeksof
theseason: 545 628 841 643
Weekly
visitor
numbersduring
the13
weeksof
theseason: 1,759 2,311 3,588 2,601
Weekday: Weekday:
Monday 27 31 42 32 Monday 251 330 513 372
Tuesday 27 31 42 32 Tuesday 251 330 513 372
Wednesday
27
31
42
32
Wednesday
251
330
513
372
Thursday 27 31 42 32 Thursday 251 330 513 372
Friday 38 44 59 45 Friday 251 330 513 372
Saturday 207 238 319 244 Saturday 251 330 513 372
Sunday 191 220 294 225 Sunday 251 330 513 372
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
26/45
20 June 2014 26 of 45
Table9 WeeklyNumbersbySeason Visitors
VisitorTrips Winter Spring Summer Autumn VisitorTrips Winter Spring Summer Autumn
Year5
Domestic Totals: Totals: Totals: Totals:
Year5
International Totals: Totals: Totals: Totals:
PerSeason: 4,431 5,102 6,835 5,226 PerSeason: 38,836 51,047 79,236 57,451
Weekly
visitor
numbersduring
the13
weeksof
theseason: 341 392 526 402
Weekly
visitor
numbersduring
the13
weeksof
theseason: 2,987 3,927 6,095 4,419
Weekday: Weekday:
Monday 17 20 26 20 Monday 427 561 871 631
Tuesday 17 20 26 20 Tuesday 427 561 871 631
Wednesday
17
20
26
20
Wednesday
427
561
871
631
Thursday 17 20 26 20 Thursday 427 561 871 631
Friday 24 27 37 28 Friday 427 561 871 631
Saturday 130 149 200 153 Saturday 427 561 871 631
Sunday 119 137 184 141 Sunday 427 561 871 631
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
27/45
20 June 2014 27 of 45
Table10CombinedVisitorNumbers Visitors
VisitorTrips Winter Spring Summer Autumn
Year1TotalCombined Totals: Totals: Totals: Totals:
PerSeason: 29,945 38,207 57,571 42,175
Weeklyvisitor
numbers
during
the13weeksoftheseason: 2,303 2,939 4,429 3,244
Weekday:
Monday 278 362 555 404
Tuesday 278 362 555 404
Wednesday 278 362 555 404
Thursday 278 362 555 404
Friday 289 374 571 417
Saturday 458 569 832 616
Sunday 442 550 807 597
VisitorTrips Winter Spring Summer Autumn
Year5TotalCombined Totals: Totals: Totals: Totals:
PerSeason: 43,267 56,149 86,071 62,677
Weeklyvisitornumbersduring
the13weeksoftheseason: 3,328 4,319 6,621 4,821
Weekday:
Monday 444 581 897 651
Tuesday
444
581
897
651
Wednesday 444 581 897 651
Thursday 444 581 897 651
Friday 451 588 908 659
Saturday 556 710 1,071 784
Sunday 546 698 1,055 772
5.3. CombinedTripNumbersCommuters,RecreationalUsers&VisitorsThe
analysis
in
the
following
tables
applies
the
specific
use
proportions
found
in
the
2014
research
to
the
patronage
demandprojectionmodeldevelopedin2013. Theresultingtripnumbersarepresentedperannumtoshowperiods
ofpeakandoffpeakusagethroughouttheyear,weekandday.
Tables13to16provideanexampleofhowpatronagethroughouttheweekanddaycould lookacrosstheseasons,
althoughthenumbersshouldbeviewedasindicativeonly.
Please note that these estimates are calculated based on trip numbers. Demand was calculated by trip numbers,
takinginto
account
two
trips/a
return
trip
over
SkyPath
per
visit
in
many
cases.
Amongst
other
effects,
this
means
for
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
28/45
20 June 2014 28 of 45
examplethattherewillbeacertainproportionofuserswhowillparknearSkyPathandthencompleteareturntrip,in
effectreducingthetotalestimatedtraffictoandfromtheHarbourBridge.
Table11Totaltripsperusersegmentyear1
RecreationalUse: CommuterUse:
Year1
Use
proportion: Trips:
Use
proportion: Trips:
TotalResident
Trips:
TotalIncludingVisitor
Trips:
PerAnnum: 100% 534,227 100% 134,346 668,573 836,471
Winter
Quarter 12% 64,107 16% 21,495 85,603 115,548
Spring
Quarter 23% 122,872 24% 32,243 155,115 193,322
Summer
Quarter 45% 240,402 40% 53,738 294,141 351,712
Autumn
Quarter 21% 112,188 20% 26,869 139,057 181,231
Weekday:
Use
proportion: Trips:
Use
proportion: Trips:
Monday 5% 26,711 11% 14,778 41,489 62,269
Tuesday 5% 26,711 11% 14,778 41,489 62,269
Wednesday 5% 26,711 12% 16,122 42,833 63,612
Thursday 5% 26,711 12% 16,122 42,833 63,612
Friday
7%
37,396
13%
17,465
54,861
76,331
Saturday 38% 203,006 22% 29,556 232,562 264,735
Sunday 35% 186,979 19% 25,526 212,505 243,642
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
29/45
20 June 2014 29 of 45
Table12Totaltripsperusersegmentyear5
RecreationalUse: CommuterUse:
Year5
Use
proportion: Trips:
Use
proportion: Trips:
TotalResident
Trips:
TotalIncludingVisitor
Trips:
PerAnnum: 100% 872,004 100% 265,340 1,137,344 1,385,507
Winter
Quarter 12% 104,640 16% 42,454 147,095 190,361
Spring
Quarter 23% 200,561 24% 63,682 264,243 320,391
Summer
Quarter 45% 392,402 40% 106,136 498,538 584,609
Autumn
Quarter 21% 183,121 20% 53,068 236,189 298,865
Weekday:
Use
proportion: Trips:
Use
proportion: Trips:
Monday
5%
43,600
11%
29,187
72,788
106,234
Tuesday 5% 43,600 11% 29,187 72,788 106,234
Wednesday 5% 43,600 12% 31,841 75,441 108,888
Thursday 5% 43,600 12% 31,841 75,441 108,888
Friday 7% 61,040 13% 34,494 95,534 129,413
Saturday 38% 331,362 22% 58,375 389,736 430,309
Sunday
35%
305,201
19%
50,415
355,616
395,541
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
30/45
20 June 2014 30 of 45
Table13Tripsperusersegmentperweekinyear1
Recreation
Trips
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Commuter
Trips
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
VisitorTrips
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Year1 Totals Totals Totals Totals Year1 Totals Totals Totals Totals Year1 Totals Totals Totals Total
Per
Season 64,107 122,872 240,402 112,188 Per
Season 21,495 32,243 53,738 26,869 Per
Season 29,945 38,207 57,571 42,1
No.of
weekly
trips
during
season
4,931 9,452 18,492 8,630
No.of
weekly
trips
during
season
1,653 2,480 4,134 2,067
No.of
weekly
trips
during
season
2,303 2,939 4,429 3,24
Weekday Weekday Weekday
Mon 247 473 925 431 Mon 182 273 455 227 Mon 278 362 555 404
Tues 247 473 925 431 Tues 182 273 455 227 Tues 278 362 555 404
Weds 247 473 925 431 Weds 198 298 496 248 Weds 278 362 555 404
Thurs
247
473
925
431
Thurs
198
298
496
248
Thurs
278
362
555
404
Fri 345 662 1,294 604 Fri 215 322 537 269 Fri 289 374 571 417
Sat 1,874 3,592 7,027 3,279 Sat 364 546 909 455 Sat 458 569 832 616
Sun 1,726 3,308 6,472 3,020 Sun 314 471 785 393 Sun 442 550 807 597
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
31/45
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
32/45
20 June 2014 32 of 45
Table15Tripsperusersegmentperweekinyear5
Recreation
Trips
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Commuter
Trips
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
V
isitorTrips
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Year5 Totals Totals Totals Totals Year5 Totals Totals Totals Totals Year5 Totals Totals Totals Total
Per
Season104,640 200,561 392,402 183,121
Per
Season42,454 63,682 106,136 53,068
Per
Season43,267 56,149 86,071 62,6
No.of
weekly
trips
during
season
8,049 15,428 30,185 14,086
No.of
weekly
trips
during
season
3,266 4,899 8,164 4,082
No.of
weekly
trips
during
season
3,328 4,319 6,621 4,82
Weekday Weekday Weekday
Mon 402 771 1,509 704 Mon 359 539 898 449 Mon 444 581 897 65
Tues 402 771 1,509 704 Tues 359 539 898 449 Tues 444 581 897 65
Weds 402 771 1,509 704 Weds 392 588 980 490 Weds 444 581 897 65
Thurs 402 771 1,509 704 Thurs 392 588 980 490 Thurs 444 581 897 65
Fri 563 1,080 2,113 986 Fri 425 637 1,061 531 Fri 451 588 908 659
Sat 3,059 5,863 11,470 5,353 Sat 718 1,078 1,796 898 Sat 556 710 1,071 784
Sun 2,817 5,400 10,565 4,930 Sun 620 931 1,551 776 Sun 546 698 1,055 772
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
33/45
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
34/45
20 June 2014 34 of 45
6.Appendices6.1.Demographics
Figure27
Figure28
Respondent Profile: Auckland Region (Grouped)
AucklandRegion(Grouped) InnerSuburbs OuterSuburbs
GroupRecreational User CommutingUser
%(AucklandRegion(Grouped))
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
54% 56%
46% 44%
TotalResponses
Respondent Profile: Gender
Gender Male Female
GroupRecreational User CommutingUser
%(Gender)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
48% 51%
52% 49%
TotalResponses
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
35/45
20 June 2014 35 of 45
Figure29
Respondent Profile: Age
Group RecreationalUser CommutingUser
Age(Grouped)
1519
years
2024
years
2529
years
3034
years
3539
years
4044
years
4549
years
5054
years
5559
years
6064
years
6569
years
7074
years
75years
ormore
%(Age(Grouped
))
20
15
10
5
0
20
15
10
5
0
7%
13%
11%
10% 10% 9% 9%
8%
4%
6% 6%
3% 4%
10%
14%
12% 12%
10%
8% 8% 8%
4%5% 5%
1%
3%
TotalResponses
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
36/45
20 June 2014 36 of 45
6.2. Questionnaire
SmileCitySurveyOnlineVersion
Note:Samplestructureisn=800AucklandRegionresidents.Respondentsmustbeaged15yearsormore.
ThankyouforparticipatinginthissurveywhichisaboutanewdevelopmentthatisplannedforAuckland.Dontworry
ifyouvecompletedasimilarsurveybeforewerestillinterestedinyourviews!
Thesurveywilltakeonly10minutestocomplete. Pleasebeassuredthatallresponseswillbestoredsecurelyand
individualresponseswillbetreatedasconfidential.
QUESTIONSREPEATEDFROMPREVIOUSSURVEYTODETERMINESAMPLE
1. InwhichsuburboftheAucklandregiondoyoulive?Pleaseselectonebelow
SUBURBSELECTION
2. Areyou?Pleaseselectonebelow
Male
Female
3. Andyourage?Please
select
one
below
1519years
2024years
2529years
3034years
3539years
4044years
4549years
5054years
5559years
6064years
6569years
70
74
years
75yearsormore
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
37/45
20 June 2014 37 of 45
4. (SHOWIMAGESFROMPREVIOUSSURVEY)Pleasenowtakeaminutetolookatandreadtheinformationbelow.Based on what you havejust seen and read, how interested would you be in the SkyPath given your current
residential/worklocation?
Veryinterested Quite
interested
Notvery
interested
Notinterested
atall
Notsure
Forrecreationalusei.e.
cycling/walking/joggingfor
leisure
Forcommuting
i.e.cycling/walking/joggingto
work/studyplace
5. FORTHOSENOTINTERESTEDATALLINQ4(RECREATIONANDCOMMUTING):Althoughyouindicatedyouarenot interested in visiting/using the SkyPath, several more questions about the development follow. Your
considerationoftheseallowsustogatheracrosssectionofopinionsonthisproposeddevelopment.
NOWSHOWBELOWQUESTIONTEXTANDMAPS
FORALL
OTHERS:
JUST
SHOW
BELOW
QUESTION
TEXT
AND
MAPS
(SHOWMAPSASPERPREVIOUSSURVEY)Pleasenowlookattheinformationonthemapsbelowconcerningthe
locationofthisattraction. TheproposedSkyPath is locatedacrossAucklandHarbourBridgewhich isaccessible
fromeithertheAucklandCBD(Westhaven,Waterfront,WynyardQuarter)orNorthcotePoint.
TheSkyPathwouldbeauserpaydevelopmentforthefirst20yearsandfreethereafterforabasiccrossing.
Pleasenowtakeamomenttoviewtheproposedpaymentoptionsdisplayedbelow.
Please note that these prices are for 1 adult (childprices will be approximately half the adultpricing). Oneoff
pricingisshownintheleftcolumnandproposedconcessioncardpricingisshownontheright.
Pleasenotethataonewaytripwouldenableyoutoreturnbyferry(chargedseparately).
RegularPriceinNZ$ Concession(HOP)cardpriceinNZ$
QuickCrossingONEWAY $3.00 $2.00
QuickCrossingRETURN $5.00 $4.00
6. Assuming SkyPath was developed with the given entry pricing, how likely is it that you would use thiswalking/cyclecrossingconsideringyourcurrentresidential/worklocation?
Verylikely Quitelikely Notveryl ikely Notlikelyatall Notsure
For
recreational
use
i.e.cycling/walking/jogging for
leisure
Forcommuting
i.e. cycling/walking/jogging to
work/studyplace
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
38/45
20 June 2014 38 of 45
COMMUTERSECTION
NEXTQUESTIONSET(Q7TOQ20)ONLYASKEDOFPEOPLEWHOSELECTEDVERY/QUITELIKELY/NOTVERYLIKELYOR
NOTSUREINRELATIONTOUSEFORCOMMUTINGINQ6
7. Whichoneofthefollowingdoyoucurrentlyusemostoftentocommuteto/fromhometoyourplaceofworkorstudy?
Pleaseselectallthatapply
Walk/jog/run
Bicycle
Bycarorothermotorvehicle
Bybus
Bytrain
Byferry
Other
Idontcurrentlycommute/Notapplicable
8. PleasenotethatthefollowingquestionsrelatetoyouruseoftheSkyPathforcommutingonly.The SkyPath will feature some protection against rain and wind. Which of the following weather related
statementsbestappliestoyouinrelationtouseofSkyPathforcommuting?
Pleaseselectoneoptiononly
IwouldusetheSkyPathinanyweather,rainorshine
IwouldnotusetheSkyPathwhenitrains
IwouldusetheSkyPathonlywhenitisabeautiful,sunnyday
IwouldusetheSkyPathonlywhenitisdry,itcanbecloudyorovercast
IwouldnotusetheSkyPathonaverywindyday,evenifitssunnyorcloudy
Notsure
Other
9. The following questions are about how you think you would use the SkyPath for commuting. Some of thesequestions might be a little difficult to answer but please consider each question carefully and give your best
estimates.
Firstly,pleasethinkaboutalltheoccasionsonwhichyoumightusetheSkyPathforcommuting inagivenyear.
Whatpercentageoftheseoccasionsdoyouthinkwouldfallineachofthefollowingseasons? Forexample,ifyou
thinkyouwouldusetheSkyPathequallythroughouttheyear,pleaseenter25%foreachofthefourseasons.
Pleaseenterapercentageforeachseasonmakingsurethetotaladdsto100%
Winter __%
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Total(sumsautomatically)
Dontknow(tickbox)
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
39/45
20 June 2014 39 of 45
10. NowthinkaboutalltheoccasionsonwhichyoumightusetheSkyPathforcommutinginanaverageweek. Whatpercentageoftheseoccasionswouldfalloneachofthefollowingdays? Forexample,ifyouthinkyouwouldonly
use theSkyPathonweekdaysandequallyonalldaysoftheweek,pleaseenter20%foreachof thefiveweek
days.
Pleaseenterapercentageforeachdaymakingsurethetotaladdsto100%
Monday
__%
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday
Total(sumsautomatically)
Dontknow(tickbox)
11. AndduringwhichtimesareyoumostlikelytousetheSkyPathforcommutingonanaverageday?Please
select
all
that
apply
Earlymorningbefore6am
Between6amand7am
Between7amand8am
Between8amand9am
Between9amand12noon
Between12noonand3pm
Between3pmand4pm
Between4pmand5pm
Between5pmand6pm
Between6pmand7pm
After
7pm
until
late
Dontknow(tickbox)
12. ONLYSHOWTIMESLOTSSELECTEDINQ11.AgainthinkingabouthowyoumightusetheSkyPathforcommutinginanaverageweek. WhatpercentageoftheoccasionsonwhichyouwouldusetheSkyPathwouldfallineachof
thetimesbelow?Forexample, ifyouthinkyouwouldalwaysuse theSkyPathbetween6amand7amandthen
between5pmand6pm,pleaseenter50%foreachofthesetimes.
Pleaseenterapercentageforeachtimeslotmakingsurethetotaladdsto100%
Earlymorningbefore6am __%
Between6amand7am
Between7amand8am
Between8amand9amBetween9amand12noon
Between12noonand3pm
Between3pmand4pm
Between4pmand5pm
Between5pmand6pm
Between6pmand7pm
After7pmuntillate
Total(sumsautomatically)
Dontknow(tickbox)
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
40/45
20 June 2014 40 of 45
13. Givenyourcurrenthome/worklocation,whatpercentageoftheoccasionsonwhichyouwouldcommutewouldyouchoosetogettotheSkyPathinthefollowingways?
Forexample, ifyouthinkyouwouldalwayswalkorcycletotheSkyPathfromhomeorwork,
pleaseenter100%foransweroptiona.
Pleaseenterapercentageforeachoptionmakingsurethetotaladdsto100%
a. Iwouldwalk/cycleallthewayfromhome/worktotheSkyPath __%b. IwoulddriveascloseaspossibletotheSkyPath,parkmyvehicleinthelocalareastreetsandcycle/walkto
theSkyPath
c. IwoulddrivetomorecentralparkinghubssuchasTakapuna from theNorthor theCBD from theSouth,parkmyvehicleandcycle/walktoSkyPath
d. IwouldtakeabusortrainascloseaspossibletotheSkyPathandcycle/walkfromtheree. Iwoulduseaferrycloseto/fromtheSkyPath(nearest locatedatNorthcotePoint,Birkenhead,Devonport
andCBD)andwalk/cycletheremainingdistance
Total(sumsautomatically)
Dontknow(tickbox)
14. FORTHOSEWHOWOULDPARKNEARSKYPATHINQ13(ifgreaterthan0%foransweroptionb.):IftherewasnocarparkingatallneartheSkyPath(withina1kmdistance),whichoneofthefollowingwouldyoubemostlikely
todoinstead?
Pleaseselectoneoptiononly
Still drive towards the SkyPath/Harbour Bridge, seeking a car park some distance away and continue to
walk/cycletotheSkyPath
Useother
transport
options,
such
as
public
transport
etc.
to
get
to
the
SkyPath
WouldnotusetheSkyPathatall(orwoulduseitlessoften)
Dontknow(tickbox)
15. FORTHOSEWHOWOULDPARKNEARSKYPATHINQ13(ifgreaterthan0%foransweroptionb.):SHOWMAPWITH PARKING LOCATIONS INDICATED WITH NUMBERS. Please have a look at this map of the surrounding
areas.
PleaseindicatewhereyouaremostlikelytoparkyourvehiclewhencommutingusingtheSkyPath?
Pleaseselectallthatapply
1. Takapunaarea2. NorthcotePointarea3. WiderNorthcote/Birkenheadarea4. Westhavenarea5. SaintMarysBay/HerneBayarea6. WynyardQuarter7. CBD8. Other(pleasespecify)
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
41/45
20 June 2014 41 of 45
16. If new bus services connected to SkyPath (at least one per hour), how likely would you be to use these busservicesonaregularbasistoaccesstheSkyPathwhencommuting?
Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow
SHOWSCALE:VerylikelytoVeryunlikely&DontKnow
17. AndifregularshuttlesconnectedtoSkyPathfromAucklandCityCentreandWynyardQuarter,howlikelywouldyoubetousetheseshuttlesonaregularbasisgivenyourcurrenthome/worklocation?
Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow
SHOWSCALE:VerylikelytoVeryunlikely&DontKnow
18. SHOWMAPOFNORTHERNLINKIftherewasalsoanadditional,wellbuiltsharedpathforcyclistsandpedestriansnexttothemotorwayextending
from Takapuna through to the SkyPath/Harbour Bridge (the Northern Link section in yellow above as an
alternativeaccessway),wouldyou?(Pleasekeep inmindyourcurrentwork/residential locationandhowthis
wouldapplytoyou)
Pleaseselectoneoptionbelow
Prefertocycle/walkexclusivelyalongthisadditionalpathtoaccessSkyPath
Prefertocycle/walkexclusivelythroughNorthcoteresidentialareastoaccessSkyPath
WouldprobablyusebothwaystoaccesstheSkyPath
Dontknow
19. Andifthissharedpath(NorthernLink)wastheonlywaytoaccessSkyPathonthenorthernside(withpathaccessnearTakapuna/EsmondeRoadandOnewaRoad),howlikelyorunlikelywouldyoubetousetheSkyPath?
Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow
SHOWSCALE:VerylikelytoVeryunlikely&DontKnow
20. Thinkingaboutthesouthern/citysideoftheHarbourBridgenow.WhichdirectionareyoumostlikelytotaketoandfromtheSkyPath?
Pleaseselectoneoptionbelow
ThroughWesthaventowardsCBDorotherareas
ThroughSaintMarysBay/HerneBaytowardsPonsonby,CBDorotherareas
Dontknow
NEXTQUESTIONSETQ21toQ35 ONLYASKEDOFPEOPLEWHOSELECTEDVERY/QUITE/NOTVERYLIKELYANDNOT
SUREINRELATIONTOUSEFORRECREATION(FromQ6)
21. PleasenotethatthefollowingquestionsrelatetoyouruseoftheSkyPathforrecreation.The SkyPath will feature some protection against rain and wind. Which of the following weather related
statementsbestappliestoyou?
Pleaseselectoneoptiononly
IwouldusetheSkyPathinanyweather,rainorshine
IwouldnotusetheSkyPathwhenitrains
IwouldusetheSkyPathonlywhenitisabeautiful,sunnyday
IwouldusetheSkyPathonlywhenitisdry,itcanbecloudyorovercast
IwouldnotusetheSkyPathonaverywindyday,evenifitssunnyorcloudy
Notsure
Other
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
42/45
20 June 2014 42 of 45
22. The following questions are about how you think you would use the SkyPath for recreation. Some of thesequestions might be a little difficult to answer but please consider each question carefully and give your best
estimates.
Firstly,pleasethinkaboutalltheoccasionsonwhichyoumightusetheSkyPathforrecreation inagivenyear.
Whatpercentageoftheseoccasionsdoyouthinkwouldfallineachofthefollowingseasons? Forexample,ifyou
thinkyouwouldusetheSkyPathequallythroughouttheyear,pleaseenter25%foreachofthefourseasons.
Pleaseenterapercentageforeachseasonmakingsurethetotaladdsto100%
Winter __%
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Total(sumsautomatically)
Dontknow(tickbox)
23. NowthinkaboutalltheoccasionsonwhichyoumightusetheSkyPathforrecreationinanaverageweek. Whatpercentageoftheseoccasionswouldfalloneachofthefollowingdays? Forexample,ifyouthinkyouwouldonly
usethe
SkyPath
on
week
days
and
equally
on
all
days
of
the
week,
please
enter
20%
for
each
of
the
five
week
days.
Pleaseenterapercentageforeachdaymakingsurethetotaladdsto100%
Monday __%
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday
Total
(sums
automatically)
Dontknow(tickbox)
24. AndduringwhichtimesareyoumostlikelytousetheSkyPathforrecreationinanaverageweek?Pleaseselectallthatapply
Earlymorningbefore6am
Between6amand7am
Between7amand8am
Between8amand9am
Between9amand12noon
Between12noonand3pm
Between3pmand4pmBetween4pmand5pm
Between5pmand6pm
Between6pmand7pm
After7pmuntillate
Dontknow(tickbox)
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
43/45
20 June 2014 43 of 45
25. ONLYSHOWTIMESLOTSSELECTEDINQ24.AgainthinkingabouthowyoumightusetheSkyPathforrecreationinanaverageweek. WhatpercentageoftheoccasionsonwhichyouwouldusetheSkyPathwouldfall ineachof
thetimesbelow?Forexample,ifyouthinkyouwouldalwaysusetheSkyPathbetween9amand12noon,please
enter100%forthistime.
Pleaseenterapercentageforeachtimeslotmakingsurethetotaladdsto100%
Earlymorning
before
6am
__
%
Between6amand7am
Between7amand8am
Between8amand9am
Between9amand12noon
Between12noonand3pm
Between3pmand4pm
Between4pmand5pm
Between5pmand6pm
Between6pmand7pm
After7pmuntillate
Total(sumsautomatically)
Dontknow
(tick
box)
26. Givenyourcurrenthome/worklocation,whatpercentageoftheoccasionsonwhichyouwoulduseSkyPathforrecreationwouldyouchoosetogetthereinthefollowingways?
Forexample, ifyouthinkyouwouldalwayswalkorcycletotheSkyPathfromhomeorwork,
pleaseenter100%foransweroptiona.
Pleaseenterapercentageforeachoptionmakingsurethetotaladdsto100%
f. Iwouldwalk/cycleallthewayfromhome/worktotheSkyPath __%g. IwoulddriveascloseaspossibletotheSkyPath,parkmyvehicleinthelocalareastreetsandcycle/walkto
theSkyPath
h. IwoulddrivetomorecentralparkinghubssuchasTakapuna from theNorthor theCBD from theSouth,parkmyvehicleandcycle/walktoSkyPath
i. IwouldtakeabusortrainascloseaspossibletotheSkyPathandcycle/walkfromtherej. Iwoulduseaferrycloseto/fromtheSkyPath(nearest locatedatNorthcotePoint,Birkenhead,Devonport
andCBD)andwalk/cycletheremainingdistance
Total(sumsautomatically)
Dontknow(tickbox)
27. FORTHOSEWHOWOULDPARKNEARSKYPATHINQ26(ifgreaterthan0%foransweroptionb.):IftherewasnocarparkingatallneartheSkyPath(withina1kmdistance),whichoneofthefollowingwouldyoubemostlikely
todoinstead?
Pleaseselectoneoptiononly
Still drive towards the SkyPath/Harbour Bridge, seeking a car park some distance away and continue to
walk/cycletotheSkyPath
Useothertransportoptions,suchaspublictransportetc.togettotheSkyPath
WouldnotusetheSkyPathatall(orwoulduseitlessoften)
Dontknow(tickbox)
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
44/45
20 June 2014 44 of 45
28. FORTHOSEWHOWOULDPARKNEARSKYPATHINQ26(ifgreaterthan0%foransweroptionb.):SHOWMAPWITH PARKING LOCATIONS INDICATED WITH NUMBERS. Please have a look at this map of the surrounding
areas.
Pleaseindicatewhereyouaremostlikelytoparkyourvehicle?
Pleaseselectallthatapply
9. Takapunaarea10. NorthcotePointarea11. WiderNorthcote/Birkenheadarea12. Westhavenarea13. SaintMarysBay/HerneBayarea14. WynyardQuarter15. CBD16. Other(pleasespecify)
29. If new bus services connected to SkyPath (at least one per hour), how likely would you be to use these busservicesonaregularbasistoaccesstheSkyPathforrecreation?
Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow
SHOWSCALE:VerylikelytoVeryunlikely&DontKnow
30. AndifregularshuttlesconnectedtoSkyPathfromAucklandCityCentreandWynyardQuarter,howlikelywouldyoubetousetheseshuttlesonaregularbasisgivenyourcurrenthome/worklocation?
Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow
SHOWSCALE:VerylikelytoVeryunlikely&DontKnow
31.
SHOW
MAP
OF
NORTHERN
LINK
Iftherewasalsoanadditional,wellbuiltsharedpathforcyclistsandpedestriansnexttothemotorwayextending
from Takapuna through to the SkyPath/Harbour Bridge (the Northern Link section in yellow above as an
alternativeaccessway),wouldyou?(Pleasekeep inmindyourcurrentwork/residential locationandhowthis
wouldapplytoyou)
Pleaseselectoneoptionbelow
Prefertocycle/walkexclusivelyalongthisadditionalpathtoaccessSkyPath
Prefertocycle/walkexclusivelythroughNorthcoteresidentialareasareastoaccessSkyPath
WouldprobablyusebothwaystoaccesstheSkyPath
Dontknow
32. Andifthissharedpath(NorthernLink)wastheonlywaytoaccessSkyPathonthenorthernside(withpathaccessnearTakapuna/EsmondeRoadandOnewaRoad),howlikelyorunlikelywouldyoubetousetheSkyPath?
Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow
SHOWSCALE:VerylikelytoVeryunlikely&DontKnow
33. InwhichofthefollowingwaysareyoulikelytousetheSkyPathforrecreation?Pleaseselectallthatapply
Iwouldcycle
Iwould
walk/run/jog
8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.
45/45
34. IFCYCLINGSELECTEDINQ33.IfcyclingtoSkyPathforrecreation,howlikelyisitthatyouwouldleaveyourbicycleatthelandingarea(entrance)andthenwalkacrosstheSkyPathtoavoidcyclinguptheHarbourBridge(whichhas
a5%incline).
Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow
SHOWSCALE:VerylikelytoVeryunlikely&DontKnow
35. Thinkingaboutthesouthern/citysideoftheHarbourBridgenow.WhichdirectionareyoumostlikelytotaketoandfromtheSkyPathwhenusingSkyPathforrecreation?
Pleaseselectoneoptionbelow
ThroughWesthaventowardsCBDorotherareas
ThroughSaintMarysBay/HerneBaytowardsPonsonby,CBDorotherareas
NeitherIwouldntapproachfromthesouthernside
Dontknow
ADDITONALQUESTIONSFORALLRESPONDENTS
36. WouldyoubeinterestedinhiringabicycletocycletheSkyPath(eitheronceormoreoften)?Yes
No
37. IFYESINQ36:Fromwhichofthefollowinglocationswouldyouprefertohireabicycle?SHOWMAPWITHNUMBEREDAREAS
a. CityCentrearea(i.e.Britomart)b. WynyardQuarterareaontheWaterfrontc.
Takapuna
area
on
the
North
Shore
d. Entrance/accessareastotheSkyPathclosetotheBridgeonWesthavensidee. Dontknow
38. How interested would you be in an additional guided trip/climb to the top of the bridge arch at a price ofapproximately$120peradult,$80perNZstudentandchild,or$320forafamily(2adults&2children)?
Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow
SHOWSCALE:VeryinterestedtoNotinterestedatall,andDontKnow
39. How interested wouldyou be inanadditional bungyjump off thebridge atapriceof approximately$150peradult,$120perNZstudentandchild,or$420forafamily(2adults&2children)?
Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow
SHOWSCALE:VeryinterestedtoNotinterestedatall,andDontKnow
40. Finally, are there any other comments you would like to make about the proposed SkyPath on AucklandsHarbourBridge,intermsofitsappealtoyou,whatyouwouldliketoseethereorhowyouwoulduseit?
Pleaseenteranycommentsbelow
TEXTBOX