Skypath Project patronage figures 2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    1/45

    20 June 2014 1 of 45

    Research Report:

    Patronage research for the Auckland Harbour Bridge

    Pathway project

    Prepared June 2014 for:

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    2/45

    20 June 2014 2 of 45

    Contents

    1. ExecutiveSummary................................................................................................................................ 3

    2. Background............................................................................................................................................ 6

    3. Methodology.......................................................................................................................................... 6

    4. SurveyFindings...................................................................................................................................... 7

    4.1. Comparisonswithprevious(2013)researchfindings.................................................................. 7

    4.2. Currentcommutingmethod........................................................................................................ 8

    4.3. Seasonaluse................................................................................................................................ 8

    4.4. Weeklyuse................................................................................................................................... 9

    4.5. Peaktimes.................................................................................................................................. 10

    4.6.

    SkyPathApproach

    A

    ...................................................................................................................

    10

    4.7. SkyPathApproachB................................................................................................................... 12

    4.8. Likelyparkingareas................................................................................................................... 12

    4.9. Likelihoodofbusandshuttleuse............................................................................................... 14

    4.10. PreferenceinrelationtoNorthernLinkpathway.................................................................... 14

    4.11. Southernroutes....................................................................................................................... 16

    4.12. Cycle/walkcombinationforrecreationalusers....................................................................... 17

    4.13. Interestinbicyclerentals......................................................................................................... 18

    4.14. Interestinaddonexperiences................................................................................................. 19

    5. ApplicationtoDemandProjectionModel........................................................................................... 21

    5.1. Recreational&CommuterPatronageProportions.................................................................... 21

    5.2. Domestic&InternationalVisitorPatronage.............................................................................. 23

    5.3. CombinedTripNumbers Residents&Visitors......................................................................... 27

    6.

    Appendices...........................................................................................................................................

    34

    6.1. Demographics............................................................................................................................ 34

    6.2. Questionnaire............................................................................................................................ 36

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    3/45

    20 June 2014 3 of 45

    1. Executive SummaryTheSkyPathconceptwasdevelopedbytheAucklandHarbourBridgePathwayTrust(theTrust)tocloseacriticalgap

    in Aucklands cycling and walking network. During the second half of 2013, Angus & Associates was engaged by

    AucklandCounciltoprovideareviewofpreviouspatronageforecastsandotherdocumentation,aswellastoconduct

    additionalprimaryresearchintopotentialusergroupings. Primaryresearchconsideredthedifferentaspectsofuse,

    aswellasthedevelopmentofademandprojectionmodelestimatingpotentialtripsforthefirst20yearsofoperation.

    The 2013 demand projection model was based on conservative assumptions and included total yearly patronage

    estimatesforthemainmarketsegments,namelydomesticandinternationalvisitorstoAuckland,aswellasAuckland

    residents. The projection model excluded a number of potential market segments, such as cruise ships and tour

    groups,aswellasspecificchildvisitation.

    Subsequenttothisfirstroundofresearch,AucklandCouncilandtheTrustaskedAngus&Associatestorefinethetotal

    estimatesfurther inordertoderivemoreclarityaboutspecificvariations indemandoverthecourseoftheyear,a

    typicalweekandatypicalday/timeforplanningpurposes.Tothisendanotherroundofprimaryquantitativeresearch

    wasconductedwithAucklandresidents.Thisreportreferstothefindingsofthepreviousresearchas2013research

    andtothecurrentfindingsas2014research.

    Surveycomparisons:

    The2014surveyrepeatedthesampleofAucklandresidentsandalsothemeasuresofinterestandpropensitytouse

    SkyPath.These

    were

    included

    to

    match

    previous

    research

    outcomes

    as

    closely

    as

    possible

    in

    order

    to

    be

    able

    to

    apply

    thecurrentfindingstothe2013demandestimation.Acomparisonofthe2013and2014resultsshowsverysimilar

    levelsofinterestandusepropensity.

    Both surveys measured the respective proportions of respondents indicating some likelihood to use SkyPath for

    recreationand/orcommutingpurposes.Theserespondentswherethenaskedquestionsrelatingtotheirrecreational

    and/orcommutinguseofSkyPath.

    Currentcommuting

    methods:

    Respondents of the 2014 survey who indicated they would use SkyPath for commuting were asked by which

    methodstheycurrentlycommutetoandfromtheirplaceofworkorstudy.Therearedistinctvariationsinthemodes

    oftransportfavoured;howevermotorvehiclesarethemostcommonformofcommutertransport.

    UsePatterns:

    ThesurveyalsoincludedasetofquestionsaskingrespondentstoestimatetheiruseofSkyPath(basedonproportions

    ofusetotallingto100%).Thissetofquestionswasaskedinrelationtotheseasons,weeklyuse,timeofday,aswellas

    themethod/mode

    of

    transport

    to

    approach

    SkyPath.

    Please

    note

    that

    in

    this

    analysis,

    atrip

    refers

    to

    one

    trip

    over

    SkyPath.Areturnjourneycomprisestwotrips.

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    4/45

    20 June 2014 4 of 45

    Theresultssuggestthat,onaverage,40%ofcommuterand45%ofrecreationaltripscouldbeundertakenduringthe

    summermonths,whilstthewinterperiodisexpectedtorepresentthelowseasonwithasignificantlysmallernumber

    of trips for both commuting (16%) and recreational purposes (12%). Applying the proportions to a typical week

    suggeststhatover73%ofrecreationaltripscouldbetakenonaweekend. Commutingtripsare likelytobespread

    more evenly across the entire week. Data also suggests that recreational use of SkyPath could be highest from

    morning tomidday,whilstcommuting tripscould be spread somewhat more evenly throughout thedaywith large

    proportionsexpectingtouseSkyPathduringthetraditionalmorningrushhourperiods.

    ApproachtoSkyPath:

    RespondentswereaskedwhichmethodtheymightusetoapproachSkyPath.On39%ofallrecreationaltrips,users

    believetheywoulddriveclosetotheHarbourBridgeandparkinlocalareas,whilstoncommutingtripsthisproportion

    isjustunder aquarter.Onapproximately77%ofallcommuting tripsand 62% ofallrecreational trips,surveydata

    indicatesthatSkyPathwouldbeapproachedbyothermeans.

    Of those who would drive to and attempt to park near SkyPath, sizeable proportions would park in the areas

    surroundingtheSouthernandNorthernlandingsofSkyPath.Resultsalsoshowclearpreferencesbyresidentstothe

    NorthandSouthof theHarbourBridge.Northernresidentsunsurprisinglywould favourparkingareas inNorthcote

    PointandTakapuna,whilstSouthernresidentswould favour theWesthaven,SaintMarys Bay/HerneBay,Wynyard

    QuarterandCBDareas.

    Afollowupquestionwasaskedoftheproportionofrespondentswhohadindicatedtodrivecloseandparkin local

    areasabout

    the

    changes

    in

    their

    behaviour

    if

    no

    local

    parking

    was

    available.

    The

    majority

    of

    these

    users

    indicated

    that

    theymightstilluseSkyPath,whilst39%ofthesecommutersand35%oftheserecreationalusersindicatedtheywould

    switchtopublictransportinsteadofusingtheirownvehicletogettoSkyPath.

    InrelationtopossibleSouthernroutesleadingtoandfromSkyPath,whilstlargeproportionsofrespondentsindicated

    thattheywouldbetravellingthroughWesthaven,Southernresidentsindicatedastrongerlikelihoodtopassthrough

    SaintMarysBay/HerneBayareasthanrespondentsfromtheNorth.

    Busand

    shuttle

    use:

    Asked about their propensity to use new bus services connecting to SkyPath, more than 50% of both commuters

    recreationalusers indicatedsome likelihoodofdoingso.Asimilarresultwasfound inrelationtotheuseofregular

    shuttlesfromtheCBDandWynyardQuarter.

    NorthernLinkpathway:

    Respondents were asked about their use preferences in relation to an additional Northern Link path connecting

    SkyPath to Takapuna as an alternative to going through Northcote areas. The question was designed to get an

    indicationof

    apossible

    effect

    on

    the

    numbers

    coming

    through

    local

    areas.

    Whilst

    large

    proportions

    of

    respondents

    felt

    unsure at this point in time, sizeable proportions are likely to useboth the NorthernLink pathway as well as local

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    5/45

    20 June 2014 5 of 45

    Northcotestreets(31%ofcommutersand25%ofrecreationalusers).Duetothelargeproportionsthatwereunsure

    atthispointintimeweadvisethatresultstothesemorehypotheticalquestionsbetreatedasindicativeonly.

    AnotherscenariowastestedwhichintroducedtheNorthernLinkastheonlywaytoaccessSkyPathfromthenorth.If

    this were thecase,a thirdofall commutersandjustunder40% of recreationalusers indicated theywould be less

    likelytouseSkyPath.Again,largeproportionswereunsureatthispointintimeandoverallweadvisethatresultsto

    thesemorehypotheticalquestionsbetreatedasindicativeonly.

    Otherproducts/experiences:

    InterestinhiringbikestocrossSkyPathishealthy(34%ofallrespondentsexpressedinterestindoingso).Themajority

    ofthosewhoareinterestedwouldprefertohavethisserviceavailableateitherentrancetoSkyPath.Whilstoverall,

    interest in both additional bridge climbs and bungyjumps seems to be relatively limited, given the nicheproduct

    natureofthebridgeclimbandbungyjumptherecouldbeasizeableincreaseindemandfortheseaddonexperiences

    due

    to

    the

    possible

    numbers

    of

    users

    coming

    through.

    There

    are

    also

    opportunities

    to

    market

    these

    addon

    experiencestotheyoungeragegroupingsinparticular.

    DemandProjections:

    Thepurposeofthe2014researchwastodetermine likelyuseofSkyPathacrossseasons,daysandtimeperiods,as

    wellasaccessroutesasmuchaspossible. Patternsofuseasidentifiedby2014surveyrespondentshavebeenapplied

    totheprojectedtripnumbersasdeterminedinthe2013research.

    The2013

    projection

    model

    developed

    for

    SkyPath

    concluded

    with

    aforecast

    of

    112,811

    trips

    by

    international

    and

    domesticvisitorsinyear1ofoperation,withthepotentialtoincreaseto222,517byyear10andthereafter.

    Regarding local patronage, the 2013 calculations resulted in a forecast of 668,573 trips by Auckland resident

    recreationalandcommuterusersinyear1ofoperation,withthepotentialtoincreaseto1,674,157byyear10.The

    combinedtotaldemandprojectionforSkyPathistherefore781,384tripsinyear1ofoperation,withthepotentialto

    riseto2,136,513by2034.

    Detailedtabulations

    on

    the

    use

    patterns

    from

    2014

    data

    by

    the

    main

    user

    groupings

    have

    been

    provided

    in

    section

    4

    ofthisreport.

    Asmentionedabove,the2014resultsshowclearhighuseperiodsthroughouttheyear,weekandday.Therespective

    highuseperiodsareduringsummer,onweekends,andduring latemorningtomidday.Given the likelihoodof the

    summerseasontobethebusiestperiod,therearelikelytobe13weekendsayearduringwhichalargenumberofthe

    trips over SkyPath could occur. The larger numbers of SkyPath users during summer weekends are driven by a

    relatively largeproportionofrecreationaluserswhoareexpectedtovisitSkyPathduringasummerweekend(73%)

    basedon

    the

    demand

    estimates.

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    6/45

    20 June 2014 6 of 45

    2. BackgroundTheSkyPathconceptwasdevelopedbytheAucklandHarbourBridgePathwayTrust(theTrust)tocloseacriticalgap

    in Aucklands cycling and walking network. During the second half of 2013, Angus & Associates was engaged by

    AucklandCounciltoprovideareviewofpreviouspatronageforecastsandotherdocumentation,aswellastoconduct

    additionalprimaryresearchintopotentialusergroupings. Primaryresearchconsideredthedifferentaspectsofuse,

    aswellasthedevelopmentofademandprojectionmodelestimatingpotentialtripsforthefirst20yearsofoperation.

    Thedemandprojectionmodelwasbasedonconservativeassumptionsandincludedtotalyearlypatronageestimates

    forthemainmarketsegments,namelydomesticandinternationalvisitorstoAuckland,aswellasAucklandresidents.

    Theprojectionmodelexcludedanumberofpotentialsmallermarketsegments,suchascruiseshipsandtourgroups,

    aswellasspecificchildvisitation(onlyadultsabovetheageof15wereincludedinthesurvey).

    Subsequenttothisfirstroundofresearch,AucklandCouncilandtheTrustaskedAngus&Associatestorefinethetotal

    estimatesfurther inordertoderivemoreclarityaboutspecificvariations indemandoverthecourseoftheyear,a

    typicalweekandatypicalday/timeforplanningpurposes.Tothisendanotherroundofprimaryquantitativeresearch

    wasconductedwithAucklandresidents.Thisreportoutlinesthefindingsofthissecondresearchproject.

    Pleasenotethatsinceinthisreportwewilloftenrefertofromtheearlierresearchundertakenin2013,forthesakeof

    brevitywewillrefertothe2013researchandthecurrent2014researchrespectively.

    Building

    upon

    the

    2013

    research

    in

    relation

    to

    potential

    SkyPath

    patronage

    numbers

    and

    characteristics,

    the

    objectivesofthecurrentprojectwere:

    firstly, toderive furtherunderstandingandmorecertaintysurrounding theupperbandofpatronageestimatesduringpotentialpeaktimesanddays;and,

    secondly,toderiveanunderstandingofhowmanypeoplemightcomethroughareas immediatelytothenorthandsouthofSkyPathandlocalstreetsleadingtoandfrom SkyPath(i.e.Northcote,Westhaven,SaintMarysBay).

    Thisadditional

    research

    was

    also

    used

    to

    address

    additional

    topics

    and

    issues

    that

    were

    of

    interest

    to

    Council,

    the

    TrustandotherstakeholdersinrelationtoSkyPathprojectdevelopment.

    3. MethodologyPrimary quantitative research was conducted with a sample of Auckland residents through an online panel survey

    similartothatemployedforthe2013research.The2014researchhoweverexcludedthedomesticandinternational

    visitormarkets,sinceAucklandresidentswillconstitutethelargestgroupofthoseusingSkyPathforbothrecreational

    andcommuting

    purposes.

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    7/45

    20 June 2014 7 of 45

    For the online survey we repeated the local resident sample and drew a robust sample of n=800 respondents,

    comprising n=400 Auckland residents from potential commuter suburbs (inner areas within a 10km radius of the

    Harbour Bridge) and n=400 wider Auckland residents (outer areas) to address both potential recreational AND

    commuter use. The sample was drawn from New Zealands largest multisource consumer panel, SmileCity, which

    providesarepresentativecrosssectionoftheNewZealandpopulation,recruitedusingavarietyofmediabothonand

    offline.Thisapproachensuresthattheresultsaredirectlycomparabletopreviousfindings.

    The2013researchresulted inasetof totalpatronageestimates towhich findingsof the2014researchhavebeen

    applied. Thishasenabledustoderiveestimatesofuseacrossseasons,daysoftheweekandtimesthroughoutthe

    day.Themethodologyandcorrespondinganalysisisoutlinedinsection5ofthisreport.

    Theresearchapproachrecognisedfourmajorusergroups,potentiallymakingupthebulkofdemandfortheSkyPath

    internationalanddomesticvisitors toAuckland,aswellasAucklandresidentrecreationalusersandcommuters (As

    mentionedabove

    there

    are

    other

    potential

    user

    groups

    possibly

    generating

    demand

    for

    the

    SkyPath,

    such

    as

    school

    classes, cruise visitors, social groups etc., which are however outside the scope of the current assessment). The

    visitorsincludedinthisassessmentaredomesticandinternationalholidayvisitorstoAuckland,aswellasthosewho

    come to visit friends and relatives (VFR). The visitor market is further segmented into day and overnight visitors.

    Auckland residents were assumed to use SkyPath as either (or both) commuters and recreational users, with each

    group exhibiting specific behaviour and use of SkyPath. The researchalso included an analysis of inner vs. outer

    suburbs,examiningthepotentialdifferencesofresidents livingclosertheHarbourBridge(withina10kmradius)vs.

    residentsfromfurtherawaywithintheAucklandregion.

    4. Survey Findings4.1.Comparisonswithprevious(2013)researchfindings

    Both2013and2014surveysmeasuredthelevelofinterestinSkyPathaswellasthepropensity/likelihoodtouse/visit

    SkyPath.The2013resultswereusedasinputtothedemandprojectionmodelutilisingtheproportionofthesample

    whoindicated

    to

    be

    Very

    Likely

    to

    use

    SkyPath

    for

    recreation

    and/or

    commuting.

    The

    current

    (2014)

    research

    uses

    thepreviousdemandestimatesinthecalculationofusebythedifferenttimeperiodsasmentionedabove.

    A comparison of the 2013 and 2014 results shows very similar levels of interest and use propensity as provided

    belowandanydifferencesarewellwithinthemarginoferror.Thismeansthatthecurrentresultsareapplicableto

    thenumbersforecastwiththe2013demandmodel.

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    8/45

    20 June 2014 8 of 45

    Table1Levelofinterest

    Veryinterested Quiteinterested Notveryinterested Notinterestedat

    all

    Notsure

    2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014

    Recreationaluse 32% 36% 37% 35% 16% 13% 11% 13% 4% 3%

    Commuting 17% 18% 17% 19% 27% 18% 32% 38% 6% 6%

    Table2Propensitytouse

    Verylikely Quitelikely Notverylikely Notlikelyatall Notsure

    2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014

    Recreationaluse 18% 19% 34% 27% 20% 24% 23% 26% 5% 4%

    Commuting 6% 7% 12% 10% 23% 23% 54% 54% 5% 6%

    4.2.CurrentcommutingmethodRespondents who indicated they would use SkyPath for commuting were asked by which methods they currently

    commutetoandfromtheirplaceofworkorstudy.Whilstmotorvehiclesareunsurprisinglythemostcommonformof

    commuter transport, there are distinct variations in the modes of transport favoured by residents of innerand

    outer suburbs. Please note that this was a multichoice question to explore popular modes of commuting, hence

    proportionsinfigure1dontaddto100%.

    Figure1

    4.3. SeasonaluseThesurveyalsoincludedasetofquestionsaskingrespondentstoestimatetheiruseofSkyPath(basedonproportions

    ofusetotallingto100%).Thissetofquestionswasaskedinrelationtotheseasons,weeklyuse,timeofday,aswellas

    themethod/modeoftransporttoapproachSkyPath.

    Most Common Methods to Commute by Auckland Region (Grouped)

    Base - Commuting User (Group)

    AucklandRegion(Grouped) InnerSuburbs OuterSuburbs

    MostCommonMethodstoCommute

    Walk/jog/

    run

    Bicycle

    Bycar/ot

    hermotor

    vehicle

    Bybus

    Bytrain

    Byferry

    Other

    Idon't

    cu

    rrentycom

    mute/NA

    %(MostCommonMethodstoCommute)

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    26%

    9%

    59%

    41%

    8%4%

    2%

    9%

    16%

    7%

    65%

    23%

    14%

    4% 2%

    13%

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    9/45

    20 June 2014 9 of 45

    Theresultssuggestthat,onaverage,40%ofcommuterand45%ofrecreationaltripscouldbeundertakenduringthe

    summermonths,whilstthewinterperiodisexpectedtorepresentthelowseasonwithasignificantlysmallernumber

    oftripsforbothcommuting(16%)andrecreationalpurposes(12%).

    PleasenotethatatripreferstoonetripoverSkyPath.Areturnjourneycomprisestwotrips.

    Figure2

    4.4. WeeklyuseApplyingtheproportionstoatypicalweeksuggeststhatover73%ofrecreationaltripscouldbetakenonaweekend.

    Commutingtrips

    are

    likely

    to

    be

    spread

    more

    evenly

    across

    the

    entire

    week.

    Regarding

    the

    commuting

    use

    we

    need

    toemphasisethatthesurveydefinedcommutingforavarietyofpurposessuchaswork,aswellaseducation.Itisalso

    important to bear in mind that a great variety of work/job types and professions will be present in the sample of

    respondents.Thismeansforexamplethatcommutersfromthehospitality,retailandotherserviceindustriesarestill

    likelycommutingtoworkonweekends.

    Figure3

    Expected Average Use of SkyPath by Season

    Base - Average Seasonal Use - All (Measures)

    SeasonalUse All(across) Winter Spring Summer Autumn

    SeasonalUse All(down)Commuting Recreation

    %(SeasonalUse

    All(across))

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    16%12%

    24%

    23%

    40%45%

    20% 21%

    TotalResponses

    Expected Average Use of SkyPath Day of the Week

    Base - Daily Use - All (Measures)

    DailyUse

    All

    (down) Recreation Commuting

    DailyUse All(across)Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday

    %(DailyUse

    All(across))

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    5% 5% 5% 5% 7%

    38%

    35%

    11% 11% 12%

    12%13%

    22%

    19%

    TotalResponses

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    10/45

    20 June 2014 10 of 45

    4.5. PeaktimesSurveydataalsoindicatesthattimeofuseduringatypicaldaycouldalsovarybetweenthedifferentusertypes.Data

    suggeststhatrecreationaluseofSkyPathcouldbehighestfromlatemorningtomidday,whilstcommutingtripscould

    be spread somewhat more evenly throughout the day, with large proportions expected to use SkyPath during the

    traditionalmorningrushhourperiod.Figure4showstripsinbothdirections.

    Figure4

    4.6. SkyPathApproachARespondentswereaskedwhichmethodtheymightusetoapproachSkyPath.Thepurposeofthisquestionwastogain

    a better understanding of what mode of transport people might use to access SkyPath in an unconstrained (i.e.

    parking) situation. The following question thengaugeswhat alternativemode of transport might beused by those

    people who would try to park close, if local car parking was restricted. The way by which potential SkyPath users

    believe theywouldget to/approach theHarbourBridgevaries insome respectwithin thedifferentusergroups,as

    wellasbyareaofresidence.

    On39%ofallrecreationaltrips,usersbelievetheywoulddriveclosetotheHarbourBridgeandpark in localareas,

    whilstoncommutingtripsthisproportion isjustunderaquarter.Onapproximately77%ofallcommutingtripsand

    62%ofallrecreationaltrips,surveydataindicatesthatSkyPathwouldbeapproachedbyothermeans.

    InnerarearesidentshaveindicatedthattheyarealsomorelikelytowalkorcycledirectlyfromhometocrossSkyPath.

    Expected Average Use of SkyPath by Time of Day

    Base - Average Use by Time - All (Measures)

    UsebyTime All(down) Commuting Recreation

    UsebyTime All(across)

    Earlymorning

    before6am

    Between

    6amand

    7am

    Between

    7amand

    8am

    Between

    8amand

    9am

    Between

    9amand

    12noon

    Between

    12noon

    and3pm

    Between

    3pmand

    4pm

    Between

    4pmand

    5pm

    Between

    5pmand

    6pm

    Between

    6pmand

    7pm

    After7pm

    untillate

    %(UsebyTime

    A

    ll(across))

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    4%

    8%

    15%12%

    16%

    12%

    5% 7%

    10%

    6% 6%3%

    4% 4% 3%

    28% 29%

    8%6% 6%

    3%6%

    TotalResponses

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    11/45

    20 June 2014 11 of 45

    Figure5

    Figure6

    Figure7

    Expected Transport Mode Used to Access SkyPath by User Type (Car Parking Not Restricted)

    Base - Average Use by Method - All (Measures)

    UsebyMethod All(across) forwalk/cyclefromhometoSkypath

    driveascloseaspossibletoSkyPath

    drivetocentralparkinghubs

    takeabus/trainascloseaspossible

    useaferrycloseby

    UsebyMethod All(down)Commuting Recreation

    %(UsebyMethod

    All(across))

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    22%17%

    23% 39%

    16%

    13%

    30%25%

    9% 7%

    TotalResponses

    Expected Transport Mode Used to Access SkyPath by Commuting Users (Car Parking Not Restricted)

    Base - Commuting (Use by Method - All (down)) and Use by Method - All (Measures)

    UsebyMethod All(across) forwalk/cyclefromhometoSkypath

    driveascloseaspossibletoSkyPath

    drivetocentralparkinghubs

    takeabus/trainascloseaspossible

    useaferrycloseby

    AucklandRegion(Grouped)InnerSuburbs OuterSuburbs

    %(UsebyMethod

    All(across))

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    27%

    13%

    20%

    27%

    15%

    17%

    29%32%

    8% 11%

    TotalResponses

    Expected Transport Mode Used to Access SkyPath by Recreational Users (Car Parking Not Restricted)

    Base - Recreation (Use by Method - All (down)) and Use by Method - All (Measures)

    Useby

    Method

    All

    (across)

    forwalk/cyclefromhometoSkypath

    driveascloseaspossibletoSkyPath

    drivetocentralparkinghubs

    takeabus/trainascloseaspossible

    useaferrycloseby

    AucklandRegion(Grouped)InnerSuburbs OuterSuburbs

    %(UsebyMethod

    All(across))

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    24%

    8%

    37%

    42%

    10%

    16%

    24%26%

    8%

    TotalResponses

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    12/45

    20 June 2014 12 of 45

    4.7. SkyPathApproachBAfollowupquestionwasaskedoftheproportionofrespondentswhohadindicatedtodrivecloseandparkin local

    areasaboutthechangesintheirbehaviourifnolocalparkingwasavailable.Themajorityoftheseusersindicatedthat

    theymightstilluseSkyPath,whilst39%ofthesecommutersand35%oftheserecreationalusersindicatedtheywould

    switchtopublictransportinsteadofusingtheirownvehicletogettoSkyPath.

    Tosummarise inrelationtothefiguresshownin4.6SkyPathApproachA,thismeansthat39%ofrecreationalusers

    believe that they woulddriveclose to theAuckland HarbourBridge andpark in local areas,however 35%of these

    respondents,uponconsideringascenariowithrestrictedlocalparking,areexpectedtousepublictransportinstead.

    Likewise,23%ofcommuterusersbelievethattheywoulddriveclosetotheAucklandHarbourBridgeandparkinlocal

    areas,however39%oftheseareexpectedtoswitchtopublictransportiflocalparkingwasunavailable.

    Figure8

    4.8. LikelyparkingareasThoserespondentswhoindicatedtheywouldparknearSkyPathwerepresentedwithamapoflocalareasandasked

    where they are likely to park. Results suggest that sizeable proportions would park in the areas surrounding the

    SouthernandNorthernlandingsofSkyPath.ResultsalsoshowclearpreferencesbyNorthernvs.Southernresidents.

    PleasenotethatforthisanalysisallresidentsfromNorthShoreCityandRodneyinthesamplewereincludedasthe

    Northerngroup,i.e.northoftheHarbourBridge,whilstallotherAucklandresidentsinthesamplewereclassifiedas

    theSoutherngroup.

    Alternative Preferred Option if No Parking AvailableSkyPath2014

    NoParkingAvailable AlternativePreferredOption Stilldrivetowardsandfindclosestpark

    Useothertransportoptionse.g.publictransport

    WouldnotusetheSkyPathatall(orwoulduseitlessoften)

    Dontknow

    Group

    RecreationalUser CommutingUser

    %(NoParkingAvailable

    Alterna

    tivePreferredOption)

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    36% 38%

    35%39%

    23%17%

    6% 6%

    TotalResponses

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    13/45

    20 June 2014 13 of 45

    Figure9

    Figure10

    Figure11

    Area Most Likely to Park In by North vs South Residents

    NorthvsSouthResidents NorthernResidents SouthernResidents

    CommutingMethods

    1.Takapuna

    area

    2.Northcote

    Pointarea

    3.W

    iderNorthcote/Birkenhead

    area

    4.W

    esthavenarea

    5.Saint

    Marys

    Bay/HerneBay

    area

    6.Wynyard

    Quarter

    7.CBD

    8.Other

    %

    100

    90

    80

    70

    6050

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    6050

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    36%

    75%

    12% 13% 8% 7% 6%2%

    10%

    21%

    5%

    50%

    40%

    27%33%

    2%

    AutobaseOn

    Area Most Likely to Park In by North vs South Residents (Commuters)

    Base - Area Most Likely to Park Vehicle - Commuting (Commuting Methods Axes)

    NorthvsSouthResidents NorthernResidents SouthernResidents

    CommutingMethods

    1.Tak

    apunaarea

    2.No

    rthcotePoint

    area

    3.W

    iderNorthcote/Birkenhead

    area

    4.W

    esthaven

    area

    5.Sai

    ntMarysBay/Herne

    Bayarea

    6.Wynyard

    Quarter

    7.CB

    D

    8.Oth

    er

    %

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    41%

    56%

    12% 12%6% 6% 3% 3%

    13%20%

    7%

    37% 36%

    15%

    41%

    2%

    AutobaseOn

    Area Most Likely to Park In by North vs South Residents (Recreational Users)

    Base - Area Most Likely to Park Vehicle - Recreation (Commuting Methods Axes)

    NorthvsSouthResidents NorthernResidents SouthernResidents

    Commuting

    Methods

    1.Takapuna

    area

    2.Northcote

    Pointarea

    3.W

    iderNorthcote/Birkenhead

    area

    4.W

    esthavenarea

    5.Saint

    Marys

    Bay/HerneBay

    area

    6.Wynyard

    Quarter

    7.CBD

    8.Other

    %

    100

    9080

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    9080

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    34%

    77%

    10% 10% 9%5% 6%

    1%9%

    19%

    3%

    49%

    38%

    25%31%

    1%

    AutobaseOn

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    14/45

    20 June 2014 14 of 45

    4.9. LikelihoodofbusandshuttleuseDespiteoftheirmodeoftransporttoSkyPath,whenaskedabouttheirpropensitytousenewbusservicesconnecting

    toSkyPath,more than50%ofallrecreationalandcommuterusers indicatedsome likelihoodofdoingso.Asimilar

    resultwasfoundinrelationtotheuseofregularshuttlesfromtheCBDandWynyardQuarter.

    Figure12

    Figure13

    4.10.PreferenceinrelationtoNorthernLinkpathwayRespondents were asked about their use preferences in relation to an additional Northern Link path connecting

    SkyPath to Takapuna as an alternative to travelling on local roads through Northcote areas. The question was

    designedtogetanindicationofapossibleeffectonthenumberscomingthroughlocalareas.Whilstlargeproportions

    ofrespondentsfeltunsureatthispointintime,sizeableproportionsarelikelytouseboththeNorthernLinkpathway

    Propensity to Use Bus Services

    PropensitytoUse Verylikely Quitelikely Quiteunlikely Veryunlikely Don'tknow

    PropensitytoUseAxesRecreation Commuting

    %(Propens

    itytoUse)

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    15% 17%

    39% 34%

    17%17%

    15%13%

    14%19%

    TotalResponses

    Propensity to Use Shuttle Services

    Shuttle

    Services Very

    likely Quite

    likely Quite

    unlikely Very

    unlikely Don't

    know

    ShuttleServicesAxesRecreation ShuttleServices Commuting ShuttleServices

    %(ShuttleServices)

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    14% 14%

    36% 36%

    15% 17%

    20% 16%

    15% 17%

    TotalResponses

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    15/45

    20 June 2014 15 of 45

    as well as local Northcote streets. Large proportions were unsure at this point in time and overall we advise that

    resultstothesemorehypotheticalquestionsbetreatedasindicativeonly.

    Figure14

    AnotherscenariowastestedwhichintroducedtheNorthernLinkastheonlywaytoaccessSkyPathfromthenorth.If

    thiswerethecase,justunder40%ofrecreationalusersandathirdofcommutersindicatedtheywouldbelesslikely

    touseSkyPath.Again,largeproportionswereunsureatthispointintimeandoverallweadvisethatresultstothese

    morehypotheticalquestionsbetreatedasindicativeonly.

    Figure15

    Preference for SkyPath Access with Addition of Northern Link

    SkyPath2014

    NorthenLinkPreference Prefertocycle/walkexclusivelyalongthisadditionalpath

    Prefertocycle/walkexclusivelythroughNorthcote

    WouldprobablyusebothNorthernLinkandNorthcoteroads

    Dontknow

    NorthenLinkPreferenceAxes

    Recreation Commuting

    %(NorthenLinkPreference)

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    17%22%

    5%

    5%

    25%

    31%

    52%

    42%

    TotalResponses

    Propensity to Use Northern Link

    UseNorthernLink Verylikely Quitelikely Quiteunlikely Veryunlikely Don'tknow

    UseNorthernLinkAxesRecreation Commuting

    %(UseNorthernLink)

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    9% 11%

    29%31%

    19%18%

    19% 16%

    23% 23%

    TotalResponses

    5%

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    16/45

    20 June 2014 16 of 45

    4.11.SouthernroutesInrelationtopossibleSouthernroutesleadingtoandfromSkyPath,whilstlargeproportionsofrespondentsindicated

    thattheywouldbetravellingthroughWesthaven,Southernresidentsindicatedastrongerlikelihoodtopassthrough

    SaintMarysBay/HerneBayareasthanrespondentsfromtheNorth.

    Figure16

    Figure17

    Southern Direction Most Likely to Take by North vs South Residents

    SouthernDirection ThroughWesthaventowardsCBDorotherareas ThroughSaintMarysBay/HerneBaytowardsPonsonby,CBDetc Dontknow Neither

    NorthvsSouthResidentsNorthernResidents SouthernResidents

    %

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    39% 36%

    11%26%

    33%

    33%

    17%

    TotalResponses

    Southern Direction Most Likely to Take by North vs South Residents (Commuters)

    Base - Southern Direction Most Likely to Take to and From the SkyPath - Commuting (Southern Direction Axes)

    SouthernDirection ThroughWesthaventowardsCBDorotherareas ThroughSaintMarysBay/HerneBaytowardsPonsonby,CBDetc Dontknow

    NorthvsSouthResidents

    NorthernResidents Southern

    Residents

    %(SouthernDirection)

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    44%33%

    14%28%

    42% 39%

    TotalResponses

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    17/45

    20 June 2014 17 of 45

    Figure18

    4.12.Cycle/walkcombinationforrecreationalusersRecreationalcycleuserswereaskedabouttheirlikelihoodofcyclingtoSkyPathbutthenwalkingacrossitduetothe

    inclineof theHarbourBridge.Again,results toahypotheticalquestionof this typeshouldbeviewedwithcaution,

    howeveronaveragearound35%ofrecreationalcyclistsindicatedtheywerelikelytowalkSkyPath.

    Figure19

    Southern Direction Most Likely to Take by North vs South Residents (Recreational Users)

    Base - Southern Direction Most Likely to Take to and From the SkyPath - Recreation (Southern Direction Axes)

    SouthernDirection ThroughWesthaventowardsCBDorotherareas ThroughSaintMarysBay/HerneBaytowardsPonsonby,CBDetc Neither Dontknow

    NorthvsSouthResidentsNorthernResidents SouthernResidents

    %

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    36% 38%

    8%

    24%

    29%

    8%

    26% 30%

    TotalResponses

    Propensity to Leave Bicyle at Entrance and Walk SkyPath (Recreational Cycle Users)

    Base - Recreational User (Group) and I would cycle (SkyPath Recreation Use)

    PropensitytoLeaveBicyleatEntranceandWalkSkyPath(Recreation) Verylikely Quitelikely Quiteunlikely Veryunlikely Don'tknow

    AucklandRegion(Grouped)InnerSuburbs OuterSuburbs

    (PropensitytoLeave

    BicyleatEntranceandWalkSkyPath(Recreation))

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    10% 9%

    29%

    23%

    24%

    20%

    27%

    32%

    9%15%

    TotalResponses

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    18/45

    20 June 2014 18 of 45

    4.13. InterestinbicyclerentalsInterestinhiringbikestocrossSkyPathishealthy(34%ofallrespondentsexpressedinterestindoingso).Themajority

    ofthosewhoare interestedwouldprefertohavethisserviceavailableattheentrancetoSkyPath,whilstthereare

    alsogoodopportunitiestoofferthisservicefromTakapuna,theCBD/BritomartandWynyardQuarter.

    Figure20

    Figure21

    Interest in Hiring Bicycle to Cycle the SkyPath

    Interested inHiringBicycletoCycletheSkyPath Y es N o

    NorthvsSouthResidentsTotal(Responses)%

    (InterestedinHiringBicy

    cletoCycletheSkyPath)

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    34%

    66%

    TotalResponses

    Preferred Location for Hiring Bicycle by North vs South Residents

    NorthvsSouthResidents NorthernResidents SouthernResidents

    PreferredLocationforHiringBicycle

    a.City

    Centrearea

    (i.e.Britom

    art)

    b.Wynyard

    Quarterarea

    onthe

    Waterfront

    c.Takapuna

    areaon

    theNorth

    Shore

    d.Entrance/access

    areasto

    theSkyPath

    closeto

    theBridge

    Dontknow

    %(PreferredLocationforHiringBicycle)

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    9% 6%

    45%

    34%

    6%

    26% 24%

    1%

    40%

    9%

    AutobaseOn

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    19/45

    20 June 2014 19 of 45

    4.14. InterestinaddonexperiencesWhilst overall, interest in both additional bridge climbs and bungyjumps seems to be relatively limited, given the

    nicheproduct nature of thebridge climb andbungyjump there couldbea sizeable increase indemand for these

    addon experiences due to the possible numbers of users coming through. There are also opportunities to market

    theseaddonexperiencestotheyoungeragegroupingsinparticular.

    Figure22

    Figure23

    Interest in Additional Guided Bridge ClimbSkyPath2014

    InterestinAdditionalGuidedTrip/ClimbVeryinterested Quiteinterested Notveryinterested Notinterestedatall Notsure

    %

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    4%

    13%

    28%

    46%

    9%

    TotalResponses

    Interest in Additional Guided Bridge Climb by Age GroupSkyPath2014

    Age(SmallGrouped)

    1524years 2539years 4049years 5064years 65years+

    %

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    04%

    7%

    17%15%

    14%8%

    5%

    37%

    26%

    20% 31%

    24%

    34%

    41%

    54%

    50%

    64%

    8%12% 10%

    9% 7%

    TotalResponses

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    20/45

    20 June 2014 20 of 45

    Figure24

    Figure25

    Interest in Additional Bungy Jump off the Bridge

    InterestinAdditionalBunjyJumpofftheBridgeVeryinterested Quiteinterested Notveryinterested Notinterestedatall Notsure

    %

    60

    55

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    60

    55

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    4%

    13%

    19%

    56%

    7%

    Interest in Additional Bungy Jump off the Bridge by Age Group

    InterestinAdditionalBunjyJumpofftheBridge Veryinterested Quiteinterested Notveryinterested Notinterestedatall Notsure

    Age(SmallGrouped)1524years 2539years 4049years 5064years 65years+

    %(InterestinAdd

    itionalBunjyJumpofftheBridge)

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    10%6%

    26%

    17%

    10%6%

    24%

    23%

    14% 22%

    35%

    45%

    64%65%

    93%

    5%10% 10%

    6%

    TotalResponses

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    21/45

    20 June 2014 21 of 45

    5.Application to Demand Projection ModelThepurposeofthe2014researchwastodetermine likelyuseofSkyPathacrossseasons,daysandtimeperiods,as

    wellasroutesasmuchaspossible. Patternsofuseasidentifiedby2014surveyrespondentshavebeenappliedtothe

    projectedtripnumbersasdeterminedinthe2013research.

    The2013 projectionmodeldeveloped forSkyPathconcludedwith a forecastof112,811 tripsby internationaland

    domestic visitors in year 1 of operation, with the potential to increase to 222,517 by year 10 and thereafter.

    Regardinglocalpatronage,thecalculationsresultedinaforecastof668,573tripsbyAucklandresidentrecreational

    andcommuterusers inyear1ofoperation,withthepotential to increaseto1,674,157byyear10.Thecombined

    totaldemandprojectionforSkyPath istherefore781,384trips inyear1ofoperation,withthepotentialtoriseto

    2,136,513by2034.

    Demandprojectionswerebuiltonconservativemeasuresandassumptions,withsignificantupside indicatedbythe

    survey findings, as well as the fact that some potential user groups were excluded from the 2013 projections. The

    survey results pointed to a very positive reception of SkyPath in terms of expressed interest and in verbatim

    comment.Adetailedoutlineofthedemandprojectionmodel, includingmeasuresandassumptionscanbefound in

    the2013researchreportpreparedforAucklandCouncil.

    The current analysis estimates trip numbers for periods of use, starting with broad seasonal use followed by

    weekly/dailyuse

    and

    approximate

    times

    of

    use

    on

    agiven

    day.

    Given

    the

    complexity

    of

    the

    data,

    this

    report

    presents

    theresultingestimatesoftripnumbersfortwokeyyearsonly,thesebeingyear1andyear5.

    5.1.Recreational&CommuterPatronageProportionsTable 3overleaf summarises the proportionaluse/patronage of SkyPath from2014surveydata by therecreational

    andcommutingusergroupsbyseason,weekday,timeofday,aswellas modeofapproach.Theresultsshowclear

    peaksand

    troughs.

    Summer

    represents

    the

    peak

    season,

    with

    45%

    of

    recreational

    trips

    and

    40%

    of

    commuter

    trips

    likelytobeundertaken,whilstthewintermonthscouldgenerate12%ofrecreationaltripsand16%ofcommutertrips.

    Asseeninsection3ofthisreport,alargeproportionoftripswillbeundertakenduringweekends,aswellasduring

    latemorningandmidday.

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    22/45

    20 June 2014 22 of 45

    Table3ResidentUseProportions

    RecreationalUse: CommuterUse:

    Useproportion: Useproportion:

    PerAnnum: 100% 100%

    Winter

    Quarter

    12%

    16%

    SpringQuarter 23% 24%

    SummerQuarter 45% 40%

    AutumnQuarter 21% 20%

    Weekday: Useproportion: Useproportion:

    Monday 5% 11%

    Tuesday 5% 11%

    Wednesday 5% 12%

    Thursday 5% 12%

    Friday 7% 13%

    Saturday 38% 22%

    Sunday 35% 19%

    Tripsbytime: Useproportion: Useproportion:

    Before6am 3% 4%

    6am7am 4% 8%

    7am8am 4% 15%

    8am9am 3% 12%

    9am10pm* 9% 5%

    10am11pm* 9% 5%

    11am12pm* 9% 5%

    12pm1pm* 10% 4%

    1pm2pm*

    10%

    4%

    2pm3pm* 10% 4%

    3pm4pm 8% 5%

    4pm5pm 6% 7%

    5pm6pm 6% 10%

    6pm7pm 3% 6%

    After7pm 6% 6%

    Approach: Useproportion: Useproportion:

    Walk/Cycle 17% 22%

    Parknear 39% 23%

    Centralparking

    hubs

    13%

    16%

    Bus/Train 25% 30%

    Ferry 7% 9%

    *Pleasenotethatthesurveyquestionprovided3hourtimeslotsfrom9amto12amand12pmto3pm.Forillustrative

    purposesthesehavebeensplitevenlyacrosstherespectivehours.

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    23/45

    20 June 2014 23 of 45

    5.2. Domestic&InternationalVisitorPatronageThe2014researchexcludednewprimaryresearch intothe(domesticand international)visitormarkets. The2013

    research found that the majority of users would come from the Auckland population and it was considered that

    informedassumptionscouldbemade inrelationtoapproximateseasonalvariations intripsmadebyvisitorstothe

    region.

    OftheofficialNewZealandtourismdatasets,theCommercialAccommodationMonitor(CAM)producedbyStatistics

    NewZealandcurrentlyprovidesthebestregionalestimatesofseasonalityinthedomesticandinternationalmarkets.

    EventhoughtheCAMmeasuresonlyguestnightsspent incommercialaccommodationestablishments(ofacertain

    sizeandexcludingsmallerestablishmentsandprivateaccommodation), itstillprovidesan indicationofvariations in

    tourismactivitythroughouttheyear.

    TheseasonalpeaksandtroughsinAucklandsvisitormarketscanbeseeninthefollowingchart:

    Figure26

    0

    500,000

    1,000,000

    1,500,000

    2,000,000

    2,500,000

    3,000,000

    3,500,000

    4,000,000

    4,500,000

    5,000,000

    GUESTNIGHTS

    YEARENDING

    COMMERCIALACCOMMODATIONMONITOR,AUCKLANDRTO,BYVISITORORIGIN

    DOMESTICGUESTNIGHTS INTERNATIONALGUESTNIGHTS TOTALGUESTNIGHTS

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    24/45

    20 June 2014 24 of 45

    Calculating the likelyseasonalityofuseofSkyPathbasedonCAMdata for the latestfullyear (2013),results in the

    followingassumptions:

    Table4:SeasonalUseofSkyPathbyDomesticandInternationalVisitors(ModelledUsingCAMdata)

    DomesticSeasonality InternationalSeasonality TotalSeasonality

    WinterQuarter 21% 17% 19%

    SpringQuarter

    24%

    23%

    23%

    SummerQuarter 32% 35% 33%

    AutumnQuarter 24% 25% 25%

    Application of these proportions to the visitorgenerated trips projected in the 2013 SkyPath research shows the

    followingseasonalvisitorestimatesforyears1andyear5respectively.Pleasenotethatthenumbersshownarefor

    tripnumbers(includingreturntrips)whicharederivedfrom2013surveyfindings(55%ofinternationalvisitorswould

    doareturntripand29%ofdomesticvisitorswoulddoareturntrip).

    Table5:

    Visitor

    Trips

    Modelled

    at

    Year

    1and

    5

    Year1 Domestic International Total

    PerAnnum 34,526 133,372 167,898

    Winter 7,084 22,861 29,945

    Spring 8,158 30,049 38,207

    Summer 10,928 46,643 57,571

    Autumn 8,356 33,819 42,175

    Year5

    PerAnnum 21,594 226,569 248,163

    Winter 4,431 38,836 43,267

    Spring

    5,102

    51,047

    56,149

    Summer 6,835 79,236 86,071

    Autumn 5,226 57,451 62,677

    Dividingthenumberoftripsbydaysperseason(91.25days)resultsinthefollowingdailynumbersperseason:

    Table6DailyNumbersbySeason Visitors

    Year1 Domestic International Total

    PerDay

    Winter 78 251 328

    Spring 89 329 419

    Summer 120 511 631

    Autumn

    92

    371

    462

    Year5 Domestic International Total

    PerDay

    Winter 49 426 474

    Spring 56 559 615

    Summer 75 868 943

    Autumn 57 630 687

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    25/45

    20 June 2014 25 of 45

    ApplyingafurtherassumptionthatvisitorpatronageofSkyPathwillvarybyweekdayand/orweekendresultedinthe

    followingTable7.Implicitintheproportionsprovidedistheassumptionthatdomesticvisitorscouldexhibitthesame

    orsimilarpatternsofusethanthelocalrecreationaluser,whilstalackofmorespecificpotentialusepatternsof

    internationalvisitorscausedustospreadthesetripsevenlyacrossanaverageweek.

    Table7WeekdayProportions Visitors

    Domestic International

    Weekday:

    Monday 5% 14%

    Tuesday 5% 14%

    Wednesday 5% 14%

    Thursday 5% 14%

    Friday 7% 14%

    Saturday 38% 14%

    Sunday 35% 14%

    Table8andTable9showtheappliedvisitortripsperweekbyseasonforyear1andyear5respectively.Table10

    showsthesumtotalforbothvisitorgroupings.

    Table8WeeklyNumbersbySeason Visitors

    VisitorTrips Winter Spring Summer Autumn VisitorTrips Winter Spring Summer Autumn

    Year1

    Domestic Totals: Totals: Totals: Totals:

    Year1

    International Totals: Totals: Totals: Totals:

    PerSeason: 7,084 8,158 10,928 8,356 PerSeason: 22,861 30,049 46,643 33,819

    Weekly

    visitor

    numbersduring

    the13

    weeksof

    theseason: 545 628 841 643

    Weekly

    visitor

    numbersduring

    the13

    weeksof

    theseason: 1,759 2,311 3,588 2,601

    Weekday: Weekday:

    Monday 27 31 42 32 Monday 251 330 513 372

    Tuesday 27 31 42 32 Tuesday 251 330 513 372

    Wednesday

    27

    31

    42

    32

    Wednesday

    251

    330

    513

    372

    Thursday 27 31 42 32 Thursday 251 330 513 372

    Friday 38 44 59 45 Friday 251 330 513 372

    Saturday 207 238 319 244 Saturday 251 330 513 372

    Sunday 191 220 294 225 Sunday 251 330 513 372

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    26/45

    20 June 2014 26 of 45

    Table9 WeeklyNumbersbySeason Visitors

    VisitorTrips Winter Spring Summer Autumn VisitorTrips Winter Spring Summer Autumn

    Year5

    Domestic Totals: Totals: Totals: Totals:

    Year5

    International Totals: Totals: Totals: Totals:

    PerSeason: 4,431 5,102 6,835 5,226 PerSeason: 38,836 51,047 79,236 57,451

    Weekly

    visitor

    numbersduring

    the13

    weeksof

    theseason: 341 392 526 402

    Weekly

    visitor

    numbersduring

    the13

    weeksof

    theseason: 2,987 3,927 6,095 4,419

    Weekday: Weekday:

    Monday 17 20 26 20 Monday 427 561 871 631

    Tuesday 17 20 26 20 Tuesday 427 561 871 631

    Wednesday

    17

    20

    26

    20

    Wednesday

    427

    561

    871

    631

    Thursday 17 20 26 20 Thursday 427 561 871 631

    Friday 24 27 37 28 Friday 427 561 871 631

    Saturday 130 149 200 153 Saturday 427 561 871 631

    Sunday 119 137 184 141 Sunday 427 561 871 631

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    27/45

    20 June 2014 27 of 45

    Table10CombinedVisitorNumbers Visitors

    VisitorTrips Winter Spring Summer Autumn

    Year1TotalCombined Totals: Totals: Totals: Totals:

    PerSeason: 29,945 38,207 57,571 42,175

    Weeklyvisitor

    numbers

    during

    the13weeksoftheseason: 2,303 2,939 4,429 3,244

    Weekday:

    Monday 278 362 555 404

    Tuesday 278 362 555 404

    Wednesday 278 362 555 404

    Thursday 278 362 555 404

    Friday 289 374 571 417

    Saturday 458 569 832 616

    Sunday 442 550 807 597

    VisitorTrips Winter Spring Summer Autumn

    Year5TotalCombined Totals: Totals: Totals: Totals:

    PerSeason: 43,267 56,149 86,071 62,677

    Weeklyvisitornumbersduring

    the13weeksoftheseason: 3,328 4,319 6,621 4,821

    Weekday:

    Monday 444 581 897 651

    Tuesday

    444

    581

    897

    651

    Wednesday 444 581 897 651

    Thursday 444 581 897 651

    Friday 451 588 908 659

    Saturday 556 710 1,071 784

    Sunday 546 698 1,055 772

    5.3. CombinedTripNumbersCommuters,RecreationalUsers&VisitorsThe

    analysis

    in

    the

    following

    tables

    applies

    the

    specific

    use

    proportions

    found

    in

    the

    2014

    research

    to

    the

    patronage

    demandprojectionmodeldevelopedin2013. Theresultingtripnumbersarepresentedperannumtoshowperiods

    ofpeakandoffpeakusagethroughouttheyear,weekandday.

    Tables13to16provideanexampleofhowpatronagethroughouttheweekanddaycould lookacrosstheseasons,

    althoughthenumbersshouldbeviewedasindicativeonly.

    Please note that these estimates are calculated based on trip numbers. Demand was calculated by trip numbers,

    takinginto

    account

    two

    trips/a

    return

    trip

    over

    SkyPath

    per

    visit

    in

    many

    cases.

    Amongst

    other

    effects,

    this

    means

    for

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    28/45

    20 June 2014 28 of 45

    examplethattherewillbeacertainproportionofuserswhowillparknearSkyPathandthencompleteareturntrip,in

    effectreducingthetotalestimatedtraffictoandfromtheHarbourBridge.

    Table11Totaltripsperusersegmentyear1

    RecreationalUse: CommuterUse:

    Year1

    Use

    proportion: Trips:

    Use

    proportion: Trips:

    TotalResident

    Trips:

    TotalIncludingVisitor

    Trips:

    PerAnnum: 100% 534,227 100% 134,346 668,573 836,471

    Winter

    Quarter 12% 64,107 16% 21,495 85,603 115,548

    Spring

    Quarter 23% 122,872 24% 32,243 155,115 193,322

    Summer

    Quarter 45% 240,402 40% 53,738 294,141 351,712

    Autumn

    Quarter 21% 112,188 20% 26,869 139,057 181,231

    Weekday:

    Use

    proportion: Trips:

    Use

    proportion: Trips:

    Monday 5% 26,711 11% 14,778 41,489 62,269

    Tuesday 5% 26,711 11% 14,778 41,489 62,269

    Wednesday 5% 26,711 12% 16,122 42,833 63,612

    Thursday 5% 26,711 12% 16,122 42,833 63,612

    Friday

    7%

    37,396

    13%

    17,465

    54,861

    76,331

    Saturday 38% 203,006 22% 29,556 232,562 264,735

    Sunday 35% 186,979 19% 25,526 212,505 243,642

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    29/45

    20 June 2014 29 of 45

    Table12Totaltripsperusersegmentyear5

    RecreationalUse: CommuterUse:

    Year5

    Use

    proportion: Trips:

    Use

    proportion: Trips:

    TotalResident

    Trips:

    TotalIncludingVisitor

    Trips:

    PerAnnum: 100% 872,004 100% 265,340 1,137,344 1,385,507

    Winter

    Quarter 12% 104,640 16% 42,454 147,095 190,361

    Spring

    Quarter 23% 200,561 24% 63,682 264,243 320,391

    Summer

    Quarter 45% 392,402 40% 106,136 498,538 584,609

    Autumn

    Quarter 21% 183,121 20% 53,068 236,189 298,865

    Weekday:

    Use

    proportion: Trips:

    Use

    proportion: Trips:

    Monday

    5%

    43,600

    11%

    29,187

    72,788

    106,234

    Tuesday 5% 43,600 11% 29,187 72,788 106,234

    Wednesday 5% 43,600 12% 31,841 75,441 108,888

    Thursday 5% 43,600 12% 31,841 75,441 108,888

    Friday 7% 61,040 13% 34,494 95,534 129,413

    Saturday 38% 331,362 22% 58,375 389,736 430,309

    Sunday

    35%

    305,201

    19%

    50,415

    355,616

    395,541

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    30/45

    20 June 2014 30 of 45

    Table13Tripsperusersegmentperweekinyear1

    Recreation

    Trips

    Winter

    Spring

    Summer

    Autumn

    Commuter

    Trips

    Winter

    Spring

    Summer

    Autumn

    VisitorTrips

    Winter

    Spring

    Summer

    Autumn

    Year1 Totals Totals Totals Totals Year1 Totals Totals Totals Totals Year1 Totals Totals Totals Total

    Per

    Season 64,107 122,872 240,402 112,188 Per

    Season 21,495 32,243 53,738 26,869 Per

    Season 29,945 38,207 57,571 42,1

    No.of

    weekly

    trips

    during

    season

    4,931 9,452 18,492 8,630

    No.of

    weekly

    trips

    during

    season

    1,653 2,480 4,134 2,067

    No.of

    weekly

    trips

    during

    season

    2,303 2,939 4,429 3,24

    Weekday Weekday Weekday

    Mon 247 473 925 431 Mon 182 273 455 227 Mon 278 362 555 404

    Tues 247 473 925 431 Tues 182 273 455 227 Tues 278 362 555 404

    Weds 247 473 925 431 Weds 198 298 496 248 Weds 278 362 555 404

    Thurs

    247

    473

    925

    431

    Thurs

    198

    298

    496

    248

    Thurs

    278

    362

    555

    404

    Fri 345 662 1,294 604 Fri 215 322 537 269 Fri 289 374 571 417

    Sat 1,874 3,592 7,027 3,279 Sat 364 546 909 455 Sat 458 569 832 616

    Sun 1,726 3,308 6,472 3,020 Sun 314 471 785 393 Sun 442 550 807 597

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    31/45

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    32/45

    20 June 2014 32 of 45

    Table15Tripsperusersegmentperweekinyear5

    Recreation

    Trips

    Winter

    Spring

    Summer

    Autumn

    Commuter

    Trips

    Winter

    Spring

    Summer

    Autumn

    V

    isitorTrips

    Winter

    Spring

    Summer

    Autumn

    Year5 Totals Totals Totals Totals Year5 Totals Totals Totals Totals Year5 Totals Totals Totals Total

    Per

    Season104,640 200,561 392,402 183,121

    Per

    Season42,454 63,682 106,136 53,068

    Per

    Season43,267 56,149 86,071 62,6

    No.of

    weekly

    trips

    during

    season

    8,049 15,428 30,185 14,086

    No.of

    weekly

    trips

    during

    season

    3,266 4,899 8,164 4,082

    No.of

    weekly

    trips

    during

    season

    3,328 4,319 6,621 4,82

    Weekday Weekday Weekday

    Mon 402 771 1,509 704 Mon 359 539 898 449 Mon 444 581 897 65

    Tues 402 771 1,509 704 Tues 359 539 898 449 Tues 444 581 897 65

    Weds 402 771 1,509 704 Weds 392 588 980 490 Weds 444 581 897 65

    Thurs 402 771 1,509 704 Thurs 392 588 980 490 Thurs 444 581 897 65

    Fri 563 1,080 2,113 986 Fri 425 637 1,061 531 Fri 451 588 908 659

    Sat 3,059 5,863 11,470 5,353 Sat 718 1,078 1,796 898 Sat 556 710 1,071 784

    Sun 2,817 5,400 10,565 4,930 Sun 620 931 1,551 776 Sun 546 698 1,055 772

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    33/45

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    34/45

    20 June 2014 34 of 45

    6.Appendices6.1.Demographics

    Figure27

    Figure28

    Respondent Profile: Auckland Region (Grouped)

    AucklandRegion(Grouped) InnerSuburbs OuterSuburbs

    GroupRecreational User CommutingUser

    %(AucklandRegion(Grouped))

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    54% 56%

    46% 44%

    TotalResponses

    Respondent Profile: Gender

    Gender Male Female

    GroupRecreational User CommutingUser

    %(Gender)

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    48% 51%

    52% 49%

    TotalResponses

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    35/45

    20 June 2014 35 of 45

    Figure29

    Respondent Profile: Age

    Group RecreationalUser CommutingUser

    Age(Grouped)

    1519

    years

    2024

    years

    2529

    years

    3034

    years

    3539

    years

    4044

    years

    4549

    years

    5054

    years

    5559

    years

    6064

    years

    6569

    years

    7074

    years

    75years

    ormore

    %(Age(Grouped

    ))

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    7%

    13%

    11%

    10% 10% 9% 9%

    8%

    4%

    6% 6%

    3% 4%

    10%

    14%

    12% 12%

    10%

    8% 8% 8%

    4%5% 5%

    1%

    3%

    TotalResponses

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    36/45

    20 June 2014 36 of 45

    6.2. Questionnaire

    SmileCitySurveyOnlineVersion

    Note:Samplestructureisn=800AucklandRegionresidents.Respondentsmustbeaged15yearsormore.

    ThankyouforparticipatinginthissurveywhichisaboutanewdevelopmentthatisplannedforAuckland.Dontworry

    ifyouvecompletedasimilarsurveybeforewerestillinterestedinyourviews!

    Thesurveywilltakeonly10minutestocomplete. Pleasebeassuredthatallresponseswillbestoredsecurelyand

    individualresponseswillbetreatedasconfidential.

    QUESTIONSREPEATEDFROMPREVIOUSSURVEYTODETERMINESAMPLE

    1. InwhichsuburboftheAucklandregiondoyoulive?Pleaseselectonebelow

    SUBURBSELECTION

    2. Areyou?Pleaseselectonebelow

    Male

    Female

    3. Andyourage?Please

    select

    one

    below

    1519years

    2024years

    2529years

    3034years

    3539years

    4044years

    4549years

    5054years

    5559years

    6064years

    6569years

    70

    74

    years

    75yearsormore

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    37/45

    20 June 2014 37 of 45

    4. (SHOWIMAGESFROMPREVIOUSSURVEY)Pleasenowtakeaminutetolookatandreadtheinformationbelow.Based on what you havejust seen and read, how interested would you be in the SkyPath given your current

    residential/worklocation?

    Veryinterested Quite

    interested

    Notvery

    interested

    Notinterested

    atall

    Notsure

    Forrecreationalusei.e.

    cycling/walking/joggingfor

    leisure

    Forcommuting

    i.e.cycling/walking/joggingto

    work/studyplace

    5. FORTHOSENOTINTERESTEDATALLINQ4(RECREATIONANDCOMMUTING):Althoughyouindicatedyouarenot interested in visiting/using the SkyPath, several more questions about the development follow. Your

    considerationoftheseallowsustogatheracrosssectionofopinionsonthisproposeddevelopment.

    NOWSHOWBELOWQUESTIONTEXTANDMAPS

    FORALL

    OTHERS:

    JUST

    SHOW

    BELOW

    QUESTION

    TEXT

    AND

    MAPS

    (SHOWMAPSASPERPREVIOUSSURVEY)Pleasenowlookattheinformationonthemapsbelowconcerningthe

    locationofthisattraction. TheproposedSkyPath is locatedacrossAucklandHarbourBridgewhich isaccessible

    fromeithertheAucklandCBD(Westhaven,Waterfront,WynyardQuarter)orNorthcotePoint.

    TheSkyPathwouldbeauserpaydevelopmentforthefirst20yearsandfreethereafterforabasiccrossing.

    Pleasenowtakeamomenttoviewtheproposedpaymentoptionsdisplayedbelow.

    Please note that these prices are for 1 adult (childprices will be approximately half the adultpricing). Oneoff

    pricingisshownintheleftcolumnandproposedconcessioncardpricingisshownontheright.

    Pleasenotethataonewaytripwouldenableyoutoreturnbyferry(chargedseparately).

    RegularPriceinNZ$ Concession(HOP)cardpriceinNZ$

    QuickCrossingONEWAY $3.00 $2.00

    QuickCrossingRETURN $5.00 $4.00

    6. Assuming SkyPath was developed with the given entry pricing, how likely is it that you would use thiswalking/cyclecrossingconsideringyourcurrentresidential/worklocation?

    Verylikely Quitelikely Notveryl ikely Notlikelyatall Notsure

    For

    recreational

    use

    i.e.cycling/walking/jogging for

    leisure

    Forcommuting

    i.e. cycling/walking/jogging to

    work/studyplace

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    38/45

    20 June 2014 38 of 45

    COMMUTERSECTION

    NEXTQUESTIONSET(Q7TOQ20)ONLYASKEDOFPEOPLEWHOSELECTEDVERY/QUITELIKELY/NOTVERYLIKELYOR

    NOTSUREINRELATIONTOUSEFORCOMMUTINGINQ6

    7. Whichoneofthefollowingdoyoucurrentlyusemostoftentocommuteto/fromhometoyourplaceofworkorstudy?

    Pleaseselectallthatapply

    Walk/jog/run

    Bicycle

    Bycarorothermotorvehicle

    Bybus

    Bytrain

    Byferry

    Other

    Idontcurrentlycommute/Notapplicable

    8. PleasenotethatthefollowingquestionsrelatetoyouruseoftheSkyPathforcommutingonly.The SkyPath will feature some protection against rain and wind. Which of the following weather related

    statementsbestappliestoyouinrelationtouseofSkyPathforcommuting?

    Pleaseselectoneoptiononly

    IwouldusetheSkyPathinanyweather,rainorshine

    IwouldnotusetheSkyPathwhenitrains

    IwouldusetheSkyPathonlywhenitisabeautiful,sunnyday

    IwouldusetheSkyPathonlywhenitisdry,itcanbecloudyorovercast

    IwouldnotusetheSkyPathonaverywindyday,evenifitssunnyorcloudy

    Notsure

    Other

    9. The following questions are about how you think you would use the SkyPath for commuting. Some of thesequestions might be a little difficult to answer but please consider each question carefully and give your best

    estimates.

    Firstly,pleasethinkaboutalltheoccasionsonwhichyoumightusetheSkyPathforcommuting inagivenyear.

    Whatpercentageoftheseoccasionsdoyouthinkwouldfallineachofthefollowingseasons? Forexample,ifyou

    thinkyouwouldusetheSkyPathequallythroughouttheyear,pleaseenter25%foreachofthefourseasons.

    Pleaseenterapercentageforeachseasonmakingsurethetotaladdsto100%

    Winter __%

    Spring

    Summer

    Autumn

    Total(sumsautomatically)

    Dontknow(tickbox)

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    39/45

    20 June 2014 39 of 45

    10. NowthinkaboutalltheoccasionsonwhichyoumightusetheSkyPathforcommutinginanaverageweek. Whatpercentageoftheseoccasionswouldfalloneachofthefollowingdays? Forexample,ifyouthinkyouwouldonly

    use theSkyPathonweekdaysandequallyonalldaysoftheweek,pleaseenter20%foreachof thefiveweek

    days.

    Pleaseenterapercentageforeachdaymakingsurethetotaladdsto100%

    Monday

    __%

    Tuesday

    Wednesday

    Thursday

    Friday

    Saturday

    Sunday

    Total(sumsautomatically)

    Dontknow(tickbox)

    11. AndduringwhichtimesareyoumostlikelytousetheSkyPathforcommutingonanaverageday?Please

    select

    all

    that

    apply

    Earlymorningbefore6am

    Between6amand7am

    Between7amand8am

    Between8amand9am

    Between9amand12noon

    Between12noonand3pm

    Between3pmand4pm

    Between4pmand5pm

    Between5pmand6pm

    Between6pmand7pm

    After

    7pm

    until

    late

    Dontknow(tickbox)

    12. ONLYSHOWTIMESLOTSSELECTEDINQ11.AgainthinkingabouthowyoumightusetheSkyPathforcommutinginanaverageweek. WhatpercentageoftheoccasionsonwhichyouwouldusetheSkyPathwouldfallineachof

    thetimesbelow?Forexample, ifyouthinkyouwouldalwaysuse theSkyPathbetween6amand7amandthen

    between5pmand6pm,pleaseenter50%foreachofthesetimes.

    Pleaseenterapercentageforeachtimeslotmakingsurethetotaladdsto100%

    Earlymorningbefore6am __%

    Between6amand7am

    Between7amand8am

    Between8amand9amBetween9amand12noon

    Between12noonand3pm

    Between3pmand4pm

    Between4pmand5pm

    Between5pmand6pm

    Between6pmand7pm

    After7pmuntillate

    Total(sumsautomatically)

    Dontknow(tickbox)

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    40/45

    20 June 2014 40 of 45

    13. Givenyourcurrenthome/worklocation,whatpercentageoftheoccasionsonwhichyouwouldcommutewouldyouchoosetogettotheSkyPathinthefollowingways?

    Forexample, ifyouthinkyouwouldalwayswalkorcycletotheSkyPathfromhomeorwork,

    pleaseenter100%foransweroptiona.

    Pleaseenterapercentageforeachoptionmakingsurethetotaladdsto100%

    a. Iwouldwalk/cycleallthewayfromhome/worktotheSkyPath __%b. IwoulddriveascloseaspossibletotheSkyPath,parkmyvehicleinthelocalareastreetsandcycle/walkto

    theSkyPath

    c. IwoulddrivetomorecentralparkinghubssuchasTakapuna from theNorthor theCBD from theSouth,parkmyvehicleandcycle/walktoSkyPath

    d. IwouldtakeabusortrainascloseaspossibletotheSkyPathandcycle/walkfromtheree. Iwoulduseaferrycloseto/fromtheSkyPath(nearest locatedatNorthcotePoint,Birkenhead,Devonport

    andCBD)andwalk/cycletheremainingdistance

    Total(sumsautomatically)

    Dontknow(tickbox)

    14. FORTHOSEWHOWOULDPARKNEARSKYPATHINQ13(ifgreaterthan0%foransweroptionb.):IftherewasnocarparkingatallneartheSkyPath(withina1kmdistance),whichoneofthefollowingwouldyoubemostlikely

    todoinstead?

    Pleaseselectoneoptiononly

    Still drive towards the SkyPath/Harbour Bridge, seeking a car park some distance away and continue to

    walk/cycletotheSkyPath

    Useother

    transport

    options,

    such

    as

    public

    transport

    etc.

    to

    get

    to

    the

    SkyPath

    WouldnotusetheSkyPathatall(orwoulduseitlessoften)

    Dontknow(tickbox)

    15. FORTHOSEWHOWOULDPARKNEARSKYPATHINQ13(ifgreaterthan0%foransweroptionb.):SHOWMAPWITH PARKING LOCATIONS INDICATED WITH NUMBERS. Please have a look at this map of the surrounding

    areas.

    PleaseindicatewhereyouaremostlikelytoparkyourvehiclewhencommutingusingtheSkyPath?

    Pleaseselectallthatapply

    1. Takapunaarea2. NorthcotePointarea3. WiderNorthcote/Birkenheadarea4. Westhavenarea5. SaintMarysBay/HerneBayarea6. WynyardQuarter7. CBD8. Other(pleasespecify)

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    41/45

    20 June 2014 41 of 45

    16. If new bus services connected to SkyPath (at least one per hour), how likely would you be to use these busservicesonaregularbasistoaccesstheSkyPathwhencommuting?

    Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow

    SHOWSCALE:VerylikelytoVeryunlikely&DontKnow

    17. AndifregularshuttlesconnectedtoSkyPathfromAucklandCityCentreandWynyardQuarter,howlikelywouldyoubetousetheseshuttlesonaregularbasisgivenyourcurrenthome/worklocation?

    Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow

    SHOWSCALE:VerylikelytoVeryunlikely&DontKnow

    18. SHOWMAPOFNORTHERNLINKIftherewasalsoanadditional,wellbuiltsharedpathforcyclistsandpedestriansnexttothemotorwayextending

    from Takapuna through to the SkyPath/Harbour Bridge (the Northern Link section in yellow above as an

    alternativeaccessway),wouldyou?(Pleasekeep inmindyourcurrentwork/residential locationandhowthis

    wouldapplytoyou)

    Pleaseselectoneoptionbelow

    Prefertocycle/walkexclusivelyalongthisadditionalpathtoaccessSkyPath

    Prefertocycle/walkexclusivelythroughNorthcoteresidentialareastoaccessSkyPath

    WouldprobablyusebothwaystoaccesstheSkyPath

    Dontknow

    19. Andifthissharedpath(NorthernLink)wastheonlywaytoaccessSkyPathonthenorthernside(withpathaccessnearTakapuna/EsmondeRoadandOnewaRoad),howlikelyorunlikelywouldyoubetousetheSkyPath?

    Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow

    SHOWSCALE:VerylikelytoVeryunlikely&DontKnow

    20. Thinkingaboutthesouthern/citysideoftheHarbourBridgenow.WhichdirectionareyoumostlikelytotaketoandfromtheSkyPath?

    Pleaseselectoneoptionbelow

    ThroughWesthaventowardsCBDorotherareas

    ThroughSaintMarysBay/HerneBaytowardsPonsonby,CBDorotherareas

    Dontknow

    NEXTQUESTIONSETQ21toQ35 ONLYASKEDOFPEOPLEWHOSELECTEDVERY/QUITE/NOTVERYLIKELYANDNOT

    SUREINRELATIONTOUSEFORRECREATION(FromQ6)

    21. PleasenotethatthefollowingquestionsrelatetoyouruseoftheSkyPathforrecreation.The SkyPath will feature some protection against rain and wind. Which of the following weather related

    statementsbestappliestoyou?

    Pleaseselectoneoptiononly

    IwouldusetheSkyPathinanyweather,rainorshine

    IwouldnotusetheSkyPathwhenitrains

    IwouldusetheSkyPathonlywhenitisabeautiful,sunnyday

    IwouldusetheSkyPathonlywhenitisdry,itcanbecloudyorovercast

    IwouldnotusetheSkyPathonaverywindyday,evenifitssunnyorcloudy

    Notsure

    Other

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    42/45

    20 June 2014 42 of 45

    22. The following questions are about how you think you would use the SkyPath for recreation. Some of thesequestions might be a little difficult to answer but please consider each question carefully and give your best

    estimates.

    Firstly,pleasethinkaboutalltheoccasionsonwhichyoumightusetheSkyPathforrecreation inagivenyear.

    Whatpercentageoftheseoccasionsdoyouthinkwouldfallineachofthefollowingseasons? Forexample,ifyou

    thinkyouwouldusetheSkyPathequallythroughouttheyear,pleaseenter25%foreachofthefourseasons.

    Pleaseenterapercentageforeachseasonmakingsurethetotaladdsto100%

    Winter __%

    Spring

    Summer

    Autumn

    Total(sumsautomatically)

    Dontknow(tickbox)

    23. NowthinkaboutalltheoccasionsonwhichyoumightusetheSkyPathforrecreationinanaverageweek. Whatpercentageoftheseoccasionswouldfalloneachofthefollowingdays? Forexample,ifyouthinkyouwouldonly

    usethe

    SkyPath

    on

    week

    days

    and

    equally

    on

    all

    days

    of

    the

    week,

    please

    enter

    20%

    for

    each

    of

    the

    five

    week

    days.

    Pleaseenterapercentageforeachdaymakingsurethetotaladdsto100%

    Monday __%

    Tuesday

    Wednesday

    Thursday

    Friday

    Saturday

    Sunday

    Total

    (sums

    automatically)

    Dontknow(tickbox)

    24. AndduringwhichtimesareyoumostlikelytousetheSkyPathforrecreationinanaverageweek?Pleaseselectallthatapply

    Earlymorningbefore6am

    Between6amand7am

    Between7amand8am

    Between8amand9am

    Between9amand12noon

    Between12noonand3pm

    Between3pmand4pmBetween4pmand5pm

    Between5pmand6pm

    Between6pmand7pm

    After7pmuntillate

    Dontknow(tickbox)

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    43/45

    20 June 2014 43 of 45

    25. ONLYSHOWTIMESLOTSSELECTEDINQ24.AgainthinkingabouthowyoumightusetheSkyPathforrecreationinanaverageweek. WhatpercentageoftheoccasionsonwhichyouwouldusetheSkyPathwouldfall ineachof

    thetimesbelow?Forexample,ifyouthinkyouwouldalwaysusetheSkyPathbetween9amand12noon,please

    enter100%forthistime.

    Pleaseenterapercentageforeachtimeslotmakingsurethetotaladdsto100%

    Earlymorning

    before

    6am

    __

    %

    Between6amand7am

    Between7amand8am

    Between8amand9am

    Between9amand12noon

    Between12noonand3pm

    Between3pmand4pm

    Between4pmand5pm

    Between5pmand6pm

    Between6pmand7pm

    After7pmuntillate

    Total(sumsautomatically)

    Dontknow

    (tick

    box)

    26. Givenyourcurrenthome/worklocation,whatpercentageoftheoccasionsonwhichyouwoulduseSkyPathforrecreationwouldyouchoosetogetthereinthefollowingways?

    Forexample, ifyouthinkyouwouldalwayswalkorcycletotheSkyPathfromhomeorwork,

    pleaseenter100%foransweroptiona.

    Pleaseenterapercentageforeachoptionmakingsurethetotaladdsto100%

    f. Iwouldwalk/cycleallthewayfromhome/worktotheSkyPath __%g. IwoulddriveascloseaspossibletotheSkyPath,parkmyvehicleinthelocalareastreetsandcycle/walkto

    theSkyPath

    h. IwoulddrivetomorecentralparkinghubssuchasTakapuna from theNorthor theCBD from theSouth,parkmyvehicleandcycle/walktoSkyPath

    i. IwouldtakeabusortrainascloseaspossibletotheSkyPathandcycle/walkfromtherej. Iwoulduseaferrycloseto/fromtheSkyPath(nearest locatedatNorthcotePoint,Birkenhead,Devonport

    andCBD)andwalk/cycletheremainingdistance

    Total(sumsautomatically)

    Dontknow(tickbox)

    27. FORTHOSEWHOWOULDPARKNEARSKYPATHINQ26(ifgreaterthan0%foransweroptionb.):IftherewasnocarparkingatallneartheSkyPath(withina1kmdistance),whichoneofthefollowingwouldyoubemostlikely

    todoinstead?

    Pleaseselectoneoptiononly

    Still drive towards the SkyPath/Harbour Bridge, seeking a car park some distance away and continue to

    walk/cycletotheSkyPath

    Useothertransportoptions,suchaspublictransportetc.togettotheSkyPath

    WouldnotusetheSkyPathatall(orwoulduseitlessoften)

    Dontknow(tickbox)

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    44/45

    20 June 2014 44 of 45

    28. FORTHOSEWHOWOULDPARKNEARSKYPATHINQ26(ifgreaterthan0%foransweroptionb.):SHOWMAPWITH PARKING LOCATIONS INDICATED WITH NUMBERS. Please have a look at this map of the surrounding

    areas.

    Pleaseindicatewhereyouaremostlikelytoparkyourvehicle?

    Pleaseselectallthatapply

    9. Takapunaarea10. NorthcotePointarea11. WiderNorthcote/Birkenheadarea12. Westhavenarea13. SaintMarysBay/HerneBayarea14. WynyardQuarter15. CBD16. Other(pleasespecify)

    29. If new bus services connected to SkyPath (at least one per hour), how likely would you be to use these busservicesonaregularbasistoaccesstheSkyPathforrecreation?

    Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow

    SHOWSCALE:VerylikelytoVeryunlikely&DontKnow

    30. AndifregularshuttlesconnectedtoSkyPathfromAucklandCityCentreandWynyardQuarter,howlikelywouldyoubetousetheseshuttlesonaregularbasisgivenyourcurrenthome/worklocation?

    Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow

    SHOWSCALE:VerylikelytoVeryunlikely&DontKnow

    31.

    SHOW

    MAP

    OF

    NORTHERN

    LINK

    Iftherewasalsoanadditional,wellbuiltsharedpathforcyclistsandpedestriansnexttothemotorwayextending

    from Takapuna through to the SkyPath/Harbour Bridge (the Northern Link section in yellow above as an

    alternativeaccessway),wouldyou?(Pleasekeep inmindyourcurrentwork/residential locationandhowthis

    wouldapplytoyou)

    Pleaseselectoneoptionbelow

    Prefertocycle/walkexclusivelyalongthisadditionalpathtoaccessSkyPath

    Prefertocycle/walkexclusivelythroughNorthcoteresidentialareasareastoaccessSkyPath

    WouldprobablyusebothwaystoaccesstheSkyPath

    Dontknow

    32. Andifthissharedpath(NorthernLink)wastheonlywaytoaccessSkyPathonthenorthernside(withpathaccessnearTakapuna/EsmondeRoadandOnewaRoad),howlikelyorunlikelywouldyoubetousetheSkyPath?

    Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow

    SHOWSCALE:VerylikelytoVeryunlikely&DontKnow

    33. InwhichofthefollowingwaysareyoulikelytousetheSkyPathforrecreation?Pleaseselectallthatapply

    Iwouldcycle

    Iwould

    walk/run/jog

  • 8/12/2019 Skypath Project patronage figures 2014.

    45/45

    34. IFCYCLINGSELECTEDINQ33.IfcyclingtoSkyPathforrecreation,howlikelyisitthatyouwouldleaveyourbicycleatthelandingarea(entrance)andthenwalkacrosstheSkyPathtoavoidcyclinguptheHarbourBridge(whichhas

    a5%incline).

    Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow

    SHOWSCALE:VerylikelytoVeryunlikely&DontKnow

    35. Thinkingaboutthesouthern/citysideoftheHarbourBridgenow.WhichdirectionareyoumostlikelytotaketoandfromtheSkyPathwhenusingSkyPathforrecreation?

    Pleaseselectoneoptionbelow

    ThroughWesthaventowardsCBDorotherareas

    ThroughSaintMarysBay/HerneBaytowardsPonsonby,CBDorotherareas

    NeitherIwouldntapproachfromthesouthernside

    Dontknow

    ADDITONALQUESTIONSFORALLRESPONDENTS

    36. WouldyoubeinterestedinhiringabicycletocycletheSkyPath(eitheronceormoreoften)?Yes

    No

    37. IFYESINQ36:Fromwhichofthefollowinglocationswouldyouprefertohireabicycle?SHOWMAPWITHNUMBEREDAREAS

    a. CityCentrearea(i.e.Britomart)b. WynyardQuarterareaontheWaterfrontc.

    Takapuna

    area

    on

    the

    North

    Shore

    d. Entrance/accessareastotheSkyPathclosetotheBridgeonWesthavensidee. Dontknow

    38. How interested would you be in an additional guided trip/climb to the top of the bridge arch at a price ofapproximately$120peradult,$80perNZstudentandchild,or$320forafamily(2adults&2children)?

    Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow

    SHOWSCALE:VeryinterestedtoNotinterestedatall,andDontKnow

    39. How interested wouldyou be inanadditional bungyjump off thebridge atapriceof approximately$150peradult,$120perNZstudentandchild,or$420forafamily(2adults&2children)?

    Pleaseindicateonthescalebelow

    SHOWSCALE:VeryinterestedtoNotinterestedatall,andDontKnow

    40. Finally, are there any other comments you would like to make about the proposed SkyPath on AucklandsHarbourBridge,intermsofitsappealtoyou,whatyouwouldliketoseethereorhowyouwoulduseit?

    Pleaseenteranycommentsbelow

    TEXTBOX