8
Slow Wires, Hot Chips, and Leaky Transistors: New Challenges in the New Millenium Norm Jouppi Compaq - WRL Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are the views of Norm and are not statements by Compaq Computer Corporation

Slow Wires, Hot Chips, and Leaky Transistors: New Challenges in the New Millenium Norm Jouppi Compaq - WRL Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are the

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Slow Wires, Hot Chips, and Leaky Transistors: New Challenges in the New Millenium Norm Jouppi Compaq - WRL Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are the

Slow Wires, Hot Chips, and Leaky Transistors: New Challenges in the

New Millenium

Norm JouppiCompaq - WRL

Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are the views of Norm and are not statements by Compaq

Computer Corporation

Page 2: Slow Wires, Hot Chips, and Leaky Transistors: New Challenges in the New Millenium Norm Jouppi Compaq - WRL Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are the

Slow Wires Wires have been slow before (Cray’s

computers) It is not the end of the world

Cray-1 core < 1.5M transistors Designers need to pay attention Machine architecture is affected Opportunity for innovation:

CMP makes more sense Formerly slow inter-chip MP communication gets

faster

Page 3: Slow Wires, Hot Chips, and Leaky Transistors: New Challenges in the New Millenium Norm Jouppi Compaq - WRL Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are the

Hot Chips Chips have been hot before

E.g., 115W BIPS-0 It is not the end of the world Designers need to pay attention Opportunity for innovation:

Low-power computing (i.e., running off a battery) will not scale well

Now pick only 1 (instead of 2) out of 3: More function Lower power Higher clock speed

Page 4: Slow Wires, Hot Chips, and Leaky Transistors: New Challenges in the New Millenium Norm Jouppi Compaq - WRL Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are the

Background: Leaky MOS Transistors Two types of leakages

Subthreshold conduction Leakage between source and drain Like having a dimmer light switch Carver Mead has been exploiting for years Many possible ways to “fix”: SOI, low temp, …

Gate oxide leakage Leakage between gate and source or drain Like having a “hot” light switch handle Over last 25 years, Tox = Le / 45 Tox = 2.1nm for 0.10um process Alternative gate dielectrics?

Page 5: Slow Wires, Hot Chips, and Leaky Transistors: New Challenges in the New Millenium Norm Jouppi Compaq - WRL Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are the

Prognosis: Leaky Transistors Transistors have been leaky before

(BJTs) It is not the end of the world Designers need to pay attention Opportunity for innovation:

New CAD tools at the circuit level Need separate gate processing for memory

core Traditional memory may not scale as well Exacerbates the power problem

Page 6: Slow Wires, Hot Chips, and Leaky Transistors: New Challenges in the New Millenium Norm Jouppi Compaq - WRL Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are the

Real Problem: Design Complexity Design team size > 250 people for flagship uP Design team growing 1/feature size Designs take longer and have fewer changes Hennessy’s verification to design team ratio ROI negative:

200people x 3years x 167K$/personyear = 100M$ NRE/unit = 1K$ for 100,000 units

“Consolidation” has been and will continue In the number of architectures In the number of distinct designs

Page 7: Slow Wires, Hot Chips, and Leaky Transistors: New Challenges in the New Millenium Norm Jouppi Compaq - WRL Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are the

Increasing NRE - Example: Mask Cost A mask set used to cost less than $25K EUV mask sets may cost >1M$ Raises barrier to implementation in latest

tech Standard uP: flagship, DSP, embedded Standard RAM: DRAM, Non-Vol, SRAM? FPGA’s ? ASICs SOC Custom-fit ? VLSI project chips via maskless tech

Page 8: Slow Wires, Hot Chips, and Leaky Transistors: New Challenges in the New Millenium Norm Jouppi Compaq - WRL Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are the

Summary + Lots of opportunities for research - ROIC (human, $) for implementation

decreasing More and more things will be

technically feasible but economically unjustifiable