Small Changes @ Caunton ……

19th March 2015 for

Agenda

Brief Introduction to Caunton Some context Small changes taken Small changes we’d like to see Summary

What We Do

Technical

SiteLogistics

Manufacturing

Context

1970’s Accounting Software1978 CSC Design Software1985 3 D Modelling

1991 CNC Machinery1995 MRP Software2000 Enterprise Portal

Project Management

Software

External Models e.g. Revit

CNC Machines

Fab Shops

Paint Shop

Site

MRP System

External Detailing resource

Cold Rolled Suppliers

Black Steel Suppliers

Accounts / Job costing

Fastrak

IT Process – Enquiry / Contract

Estimate

Bid

Enterprise Portal

Project Management

Software

External Models e.g. Revit

CNC Machines

Fab Shops

Paint Shop

Site

MRP System

External Detailing resource

Cold Rolled Suppliers

Black Steel Suppliers

Accounts / Job costing

Fastrak

IT Process – Enquiry / Contract

Estimate

Bid

Enterprise Portal

Design for Downstream

Small changes taken

Use of colours for fast visual update status

Red = connected – can be issued to fabrication

Green = partly connected – cannot be issued

Grey = modelled but awaiting external information / calcs

Small changes taken

Design and drawing for efficient manufacture

Align as many holes in web and flange = can be drilled at same time

Use the same hole size = less tool changing

Few seconds saved over thousands of holes is a big benefit

P

Small changes taken

Small Changes we’d like to see

At a steel users level we see where we are and where we are going

Models – Drawings – Machines (CNC, Robots)

But ….we will still need drawings

With Execution Classes we need far better drawings right now

Small changes we’d like to see

Neutral Data - .rvt to .ifc� Accurate� Timely

Relevant Up to date

� Ability to be kept up to date BIM Execution Plans that reflect

the reality of supply chain

Small Changes we’d like to see

Type Steel & Cladding Package Technical % Sub

Package Total Development Cost % Development Cost

Renewable Energy Plant 6,400,000 163,000 2.5% 150,000,000 0.11%

Type Steel Technical % Sub Package Total Development Cost % Development Cost

Beam Column London 1,380,000 47,000 3.4% 33,120,000 0.14%

Beam Column London 1,420,000 58,400 4.1% 17,000,000 0.34%

Average 1,400,000 52,700 3.8% 25,060,000 0.21%

Small Changes we’d like to see

Type Steel Technical % Sub Package Total Development Cost % Development Cost

Shed 1 850,000 42,000 4.9% 8,500,000 0.49%

Shed 2 1,550,000 106,000 6.8% 15,500,000 0.68%

Shed 3 2,000,000 66,000 3.3% 20,000,000 0.33%

Shed 4 2,350,000 62,000 2.6% 23,500,000 0.26%

Average 1,687,500 71,333 4.2% 16,875,000 0.42%

Small Changes we’d like to see

Assumptions

– Take a contract with the highest percentage of technical costs @ 0.42%

– Use cost of money @ 5%

– No monthly interim payments - £71k “up front”

– Relate this to the contract program

Small changes we’d like to see

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27£0

£500

£1,000

£1,500

£2,000

Financing Costs

Weeks

Small Changes we’d like to see

£71,000 outlay 27 weeks ahead of normal at 5% costs £1,843

4 crews @ £10,000 / crew / week cost £40,000 per week

Site costs for just steel £8,000 / day

Finance costs £14 / day

Can we save more than £14 / day by utilising BIM during the capital expenditure phase more effectively?

Small beer = potentially a big benefit?

Feel that current focus is too much on “Op Ex BIM” and we’re in danger of not realising the “Cap Ex BIM” benefit

Summary Series of building blocks Gradual integration and converging technologies Overtime this has reaped big benefits Digital era is here – what we draw is real These small changes have had big benefits

Thank You