Upload
trandat
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Snow/Ice melt and Glacial Lake Outburst Flood in Himalayan region
Dr. SANJAY K JAIN
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HYDROLOGY
ROORKEE
“Modelling and management flood risk in mountain areas”
17-19 Feb., 2015 at Sacramento, California, USA
About 35% of the geographical area of India is covered by mountains and
58% of this is accounted for by the mighty Himalayas in which more than
5000 glaciers covering about 38000 km2 area.
There are 22 major river systems with about 1 million km2 catchment area
lying in the Himalayas, with snow and glacier melt runoff of more than 50%.
The seasonal snow and glacier melt coming from the Himalayan Rivers is a
dependable source of water for irrigation, hydroelectric power and drinking
water supply.
The hydropower generation contributes about 26% of total installed capacity
in India in which Himalayan river systems contribute 78% of the total Indian
hydropower potential.
Snow melt modelling is a crucial element to predict runoff from snow-
covered or glacierised areas, as well as for snow/ice melt flooding
The flood due to glacial lake outburst is one of the major issue because of
climate change.
Himalayan Water Resources
Terai <300m
Siwalik 900-1500m
Lesser
Himalaya 3600-4600m
Greater Himalaya > 4600m
Outer Himalaya 1500- 3500m
Tibetan Plateau
4000m
Western Disturbances
Nov. – March/April
SW Monsoon
June – Sep Glaciers – 10%
Winter snow cover 35-50 %
Maximum monsoon precipitation at
1500 – 3000 m asl
INDUS, GANGA, BRAHMAPUTRA BASINS
4
It is known that the effect of global climate change on
hydrologic systems, especially on mountain snow and
glacier melt, can modify the timing and amount of runoff in
mountainous watersheds.
Streamflow simulation and forecast is of great importance
to water resources management and planning, and can
provide a firm basis for forecasts of water resources
availability while minimizing the risk and loss from floods
caused by rapid snow and glacier melt.
When the ground is frozen, the water produced by the
melting snow is unable to penetrate and runs off over the
ground surface into streams and lakes.
The situation can become of even greater concern if the
rising snowmelt runoff is compounded by runoff from heavy
rainfall.
SNOW/ICE MELT FLOOD
Glacial Lake And Glacial Lake Outburst Flood (GLOF)
Glacial dammed lakes are formed by accumulation of water from the melting of Snow and Ice cover and by blockage of end moraines.
A glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) can occur when a lake contained by a glacier or a terminal moraine dam fails.
The bursting of moraine-dammed lakes is often due to the breaching of the dam by the erosion of the dam material as a result of overtopping by surging water or piping of dam material
GLOF STUDIES HAVE
BEEN CARRIED OUT FOR
LAKES IN THE BASINS
OF GHARWAL
HIMALAYA, EASTERN
HIMALAYA AND BHUTAN
HIMALAYS
SNOW AND GLACIER MELT
Location of the study area and meteorological stations in the Satluj basin
STREAM FLOW MODELLING IN SATLUJ BASIN
NOAA-AVHRR Images (2004)
MODIS SNOW Data Product (2004)
MODIS LST Data Product (2004)
Snow Cover Depletion Curve
Lapse Rate estimation from MODIS LST maps
METHODOLOGY
STREAM FLOW MODELLING
Main steps in modelling are as follows:
Division of Basin Into Elevation Bands
Processing of Meteorological Data
• Temperature Distribution
• Precipitation Distribution
Form of Precipitation
Variability of Snow Covered Area
Melt due to rain
Degree Day Factor for Snow and Ice
Routing of Surface and Sub Surface Flow
Simulation of Runoff (2000-2001)
Simulation of Runoff (2001-2002)
To estimate the flood due to GLOF
Valley planning and flood management
To formulate emergency procedures such as warning system, evacuation plan etc.
To identify and solve unexpected flood problems due to accidents
To remove fear in public and make the public aware of the risk
To analyze past accidents for advancement of the state of art
ASSESSMENT AND SIMULATION OF GLACIER LAKE OUTBURST FLOODS IN HIMALAYAN REGION
For estimating the Glacial Lake Outburst flood, the following approach and methodology has been adopted:
Inventory of glacier and glacial lakes
Finding out the potentially dangerous glacial lakes
Estimation of Glacial lake volume and finalisation of Glacial lakes for GLOF simulation
Estimation of breach parameter for GLOF/dam breach simulation and the consequent dam breach flood using MIKE11 model Channel routing of dam breach flood through the entire reach of river from the GLOF site to the site to get the magnitude of flood peak at site.
METHODOLOGY
)2()NIRGREEN(
)NIRGREEN(NDWI
GREEN is a band that encompasses reflected green light
and NIR represents reflected near-infrared radiation
The selection of these wavelengths was done to :
(1) maximize the typical reflectance of water features by using
green light wavelengths
(2) minimize the low reflectance of NIR by water features; and
(3) take advantage of the high reflectance of NIR by terrestrial
vegetation and soil features.
Normalized Difference Water Index
IDENTIFICATION OF GLACIAL LAKES
NDWI<T1
Slope<10% R1>T2
Glacial Lake
Yes
No Lake
R2<T3
No Lake
Slope<10%
Glacial Lake
Ye
s
Ye
s
No
Ye
s
No
No
No Lake
No Lake
Ye
s
Algorithm to automatically classify glacial lakes on IRS Images, using a decision tree. Ti represents
a threshold, whose value is determined empirically on each scene by visual inspection.
R1= BGreen/BNIR
R2= BNIR/BSWIR
CRITERIA FOR IDENTIFICATION OF DANGEROUS LAKE
Rise in lake water level
In general the lakes which have a volume of more than 0.01 km3 are
found to have past events. A lake which has a larger volume than this
is deeper, with a deeper part near the dam (lower part of lake) rather
than near the glacier tongue, and has rapid increase in lake water
volume is an indication that a lake is potentially dangerous.
Activity of supraglacial lakes
Groups of closely spaced supraglacial lakes of smaller size at glacier
tongues merge as time passes and form bigger lakes. These activities
of supraglacial lakes are indications that the lakes are becoming
potentially dangerous.
POSITION OF LAKES
The potentially dangerous lakes are generally at the lower part of the
ablation area of the glacier near to the end moraine, and the mother
glacier should be sufficiently large to create a potentially dangerous
lake environment.
The valley lakes with an area bigger than 0.1 km2 and a distance less
than 0.5 km from the mother glacier of considerable size are
considered to be potentially dangerous.
DAM CONDITIONS
The natural conditions of the moraine damming the lake determine the
lake stability. Lake stability will be less if the moraine dam has a
combination of the following characteristics:
• narrower in the crest area
• no drainage outflow or outlet not well defined
• steeper slope of the moraine walls
• ice cored
• breached and closed in the past and refilled again with water
seepage flow at moraine walls
CONDITION OF ASSOCIATED MOTHER GLACIER
The following general characteristics of associated mother glaciers
can create danger to moraine-dammed lakes:
• hanging glacier in contact with the lake,
• bigger glacier area,
• fast retreating,
• debris cover at glacier tongue area,
• steep gradient at glacier tongue area,
PHYSICAL CONDITIONS OF SURROUNDINGS
• potential rockfall/slide (mass movements) site around the lake which
can fall into the lake suddenly
• snow avalanches of large size around the lake which can fall into the
lake suddenly
• neo-tectonic and earthquake activities around or near the lake area
• climatic conditions of successive years being a relatively wet and
cold year followed by a hot and wet or hot and arid year
Glacier and Glacier lake mapping
Drainage network and Length of stream d/s lake
DEM of the basin
Cross Section at regular interval downstream of lake
Area and Volume of the lake
Breach width and Depth
100 year return flood if available
GLOF SIMULATION: INPUT REQUIRED
MIKE11 DAM BREAK MODELLING
LAKE DEPTH
The empirical relations as available by Huggel et al. (2002) is:
The lake volume D = 0.104 A0.42
where D is the depth of lake in m and A is the lake area in m2.
LAKE VOLUME
The empirical relations as available by Huggel et al. (2002) is:
The lake volume V = 0.104 A1.42
where V is the lake volume in m3 and A is the lake area in m2.
Chorabari Lake
Chorabari Lake outburst - (June 17, 2013)
GLOF: CASE STUDIES
Satellite pictures shows that the glacial regions above Kedarnath had received
fresh and excess snowfall when heavy rainfall hit the region.
(Source NRSC,2013)
SNOW COVER DURING MAY-JUNE 2013
Chubda Lake
x-section of downstream lake
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
30.00
120.00
210.00
300.00
390.00
480.00
570.00
660.00
750.00
840.00
930.00
1020.00
1110.00
1200.00
1290.00
1380.00
1470.00
1560.00
1650.00
1740.00
1830.00
1920.00
2010.00
2100.00
2190.00
Distance from right bank to left bank in meter
Elevatio
n in
m
eter
xsec_dam
xsec_5km from dam
xsec_10km from dam
xsec_15km from dam
xsec_20km from dam
xsec_25km from dam
xsec_30km from dam
"xsec_35km from dam
xsec_40km from dam
xsec_45km from dam
xsec_50km from dam
xsec_55km from dam
xsec_60km from dam
xsec_65km from dam
xsec_70km from dam
xsec_75km from dam
xsec_80km from dam
xsec_85km from dam
xsec_90km from dam
xsec_95km from dam
xsec_100km from dam
xsec_105km from dam
xsec_110km from dam
xsec_115km from dam
00:00:00
21-4-2006
04:00:00 08:00:00 12:00:00 16:00:00 20:00:00 00:00:00
22-4-2006
04:00:00 08:00:00 12:00:00 16:00:00 20:00:00 00:00:00
23-4-2006
0.0
500.0
1000.0
1500.0
2000.0
2500.0
3000.0
3500.0
4000.0
4500.0
5000.0
5500.0
6000.0
6500.0
7000.0
7500.0
8000.0
8500.0
9000.0
9500.0
10000.0
10500.0
[m^3/s] Time Series Discharge
GLOF HYDROGRAPH AT CHAMKHARCHU H.E. PROJECT BHUTAN
10251.71 cumec
5068.59 cumec
2 hour 10 minutes
4920 m V=54.18 Mm3
D=40 m
900 m
118.84 km
KURI-GONGRI HE PROJECTS, BHUTAN
Kuri basin
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103109115121127133139145151157163169175181187
Ele
vatio
n (m
)
Distance (m)
Cross-section of Kuri Basinxsec at dam site
xsec at 1 km from dam site
xsec at 3 km from dam site
xsec at 4 km from dam site
xsec at 5 km from dam site
xsec at 6 km from dam site
xsec at 7 km from dam site
xsec at 8 km from dam site
xsec at 9 km from dam site
xsec at 10 km from dam site
xsec at 11 km from dam site
xsec at 12 km from dam site
xsec at 13 km from dam site
xsec at 14 km from dam site
xsec at 15 km from dam site
xsec at 16 km from dam site
xsec at 17 km from dam site
xsec at 18 km from dam site
xsec at 19 km from dam site
xsec at 20 km from dam site
xsec at 21 km from dam site
xsec at 22 km from dam site
xsec at 23 km from dam site
xsec at 24 km from dam site
xsec at 26 km from dam site
xsec at 27 km from dam site
xsec at 28 km from dam site
xsec at 29 km from dam site
xsec at 30 km from dam site
xsec at 31 km from dam site
xsec at 32 km from dam site
xsec at 33 km from dam site
xsec at 34 km from dam site
xsec at 35 km from dam site
xsec at 36 km from dam site
xsec at 37 km from dam site
xsec at 38 km from dam site
xsec at 39 km from dam site
xsec at 40 km from dam site
xsec at 41 km from dam site
xsec at 42 km from dam site
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
00:00:00 02:09:36 04:19:12 06:28:48 08:38:24 10:48:00
Dis
char
ge (m
3 /s)
Time (hh:mm:ss)
GLOF
KURI
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
00:00:00 02:09:36 04:19:12 06:28:48 08:38:24 10:48:00
Dis
char
ge (m
3/s
)
Time (hh:mm:ss)
GLOF
KURI
8478.9 cumec
6821.0 cumec
4690 m V=11.62 Mcum
D=40 m
1 hour 50 minutes
194 km
KURI-GONGRI HE PROJECTS, BHUTAN
Gongri basin
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99 106 113 120 127 134 141 148 155 162 169 176 183
Ele
vati
on
(m
)
Distance (m)
Cross section Of Gongri Basinxsec at lakexsec at 1km from lakexsec at 2km from lakexsec at 3km from lakexsec at 4km from lakexsec at 5km from lakexsec at 6km from lakexsec at 7km from lakexsec at 8km from lakexsec at 9km from lakexsec at 10km from lakexsec at11 km from lakexsec at 12km from lakexsec at 13km from lakexsec at 14km from lakexsec at 15km from lakexsec at 16km from lakexsec at 17km from lakexsec at 18km from lakexsec at 20km from lakexsec at 21km from lakexsec at 22km from lakexsec at 23km from lakexsec at24 km from lakexsec at 25km from lakexsec at 26km from lakexsec at 27km from lakexsec at 28km from lakexsec at 29km from lakexsec at 30km from lakexsec at 31km from lakexsec at 32km from lakexsec at 33km from lakexsec at 34km from lakexsec at 35 km from lakexsec at 36km from lakexsec at37km from lakexsec at 38km from lakexsec at 39km from lakexsec at 40km from lakexsec at 41km from lakexsec at 42km from lakexsec at 43km from lakexsec at44km from lakexsec at 45km from lakexsec at 46km from lakexsec at 47km from lakexsec at 48km from lakexsec at 49km from lakexsec at 50km from lakexsec at 51km from lakexsec at 52km from lakexsec at 53km from lakexsec at 54km from lakexsec at 55km from lakexsec at 56km from lakexsec at 57km from lakexsec at 58km from lakexsec at 59km from lakexsec at 60km from lakexsec at 61km from lakexsec at 62km from lakexsec at 64 km from lakexsec at 66km from lakexsec at 68km from lakexsec at 69km from lakexsec at70 km from lakexsec at 71km from lakexsec at 72km from lakexsec at 74km from lakexsec at 75km from lakexsec at 76km from lakexsec at 77km from lakexsec at 78km from lakexsec at 79km from lakexsec at 80km from lakexsec at 81km from lakexsec at 82km from lakexsec at 83km from lakexsec at 84km from lake
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
00:00:00 01:26:24 02:52:48 04:19:12 05:45:36 07:12:00 08:38:24 10:04:48 11:31:12
Dis
char
ge (m
3 /s)
Time (hh:mm:ss)
GLOF
GONGRI
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
00:00:00 01:26:24 02:52:48 04:19:12 05:45:36 07:12:00 08:38:24 10:04:48 11:31:12
Dis
char
ge (m
3 /s)
Time (hh:mm:ss)
GLOF
GONGRI
4685.3 cumec
3850.5 cuemc
4564 m
45.56 Mm3
D=25 m
1 hour 20 minutes
114.3 km
LACHUNG HE PROJECT, SIKKIM, INDIA
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 101 106 111 116 121 126 131 136
distance(m)
ele
va
tio
n(m
)
xsection at lake
xsection at 1km from lake
xsection at 2 km from lake
xsection at 3 km from lake
xsection at 4km from lake
xsection at 5 km from lake
xsection at 6 km from lake
xsection at 7km from lake
xsection at 8 km from lake
xsection at 9 km from lake
xsection at 10 km from lake
xsection at 11 km from lake
xsection at 12 km from lake
xsection at 13 km from lake
xsection at 14 km from lake
xsection at 15 km from lake
xsection at 16 km from lake
xsection at 17 km from lake
xsection at 18 km from lake
xsection at 19 km from lake
xsection at 20 km from lake
xsection at 21 km from lake
xsection at 22 km from lake
xsection at 23 km from lake
xsection at 24 km from lake
xsection at 25 km from lake
xsection at 26 km from lake
xsection at 27 km from lake
xsection at 28 km from lake
xsection at 29 km from lake
xsection at 30 km from lake
xsection at 31 km from lake
xsection at 32 km from lake
xsection at 33 km from lake
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0:00 1:12 2:24 3:36 4:48 6:00 7:12 8:24 9:36
TIME (HH:MM)
Q (
m3/s
)
BhimkyongHEP
GLOF
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0:00 1:12 2:24 3:36 4:48 6:00 7:12 8:24 9:36
TIME (HH:MM)
Q (
m3/s
)
Bop HEP
GLOF
Site-I Site-II
919.04 cumec 919.04 cumec
751.10 cumec 749.29 cumec
50 minutes
V= 54.18 Mcum
D= 16 m
Site-I 32 km
Site-II
36 km
Site-III
38 km
4812 m
TAWANG H.E. PROJECT, ARUNCHAL PRADESH
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99 106 113 120 127 134 141 148 155 162 169 176 183
Elevatio
n(m
)
Distance (m)
Cross- section of Twang Basin xsec at lake
xsec at 1km from lake
xsec at 2 km from lake
xsec at 3km from lake
xsec at 4km from lake
xsec at 5km from lake
xsec at 6km from lake
xsec at 7km from lake
xsec at 8km from lake
xsec at 9km from lake
xsec at 10km from lake
xsec at 12km from lake
xsec at 13km from lake
xsec at 14km from lake
xsec at 15km from lake
xsec at 16km from lake
xsec at 17km from lake
xsec at 18km from lake
xsec at 19km from lake
xsec at 20km from lake
xsec at 25km from lake
xsec at 26km from lake
xsec at 27km from lake
xsec at 28km from lake
xsec at29 km from lake
xsec at 30km from lake
xsec at 32km from lake
xsec at 33km from lake
xsec at 34km from lake
xsec at 38km from lake
xsec at 39km from lake
xsec at 40km from lake
xsec at 41km from lake
xsec at 42km from lake
xsec at 43km from lake
xsec at 44km from lake
xsec at 45km from lake
xsec at 46km from lake
xsec at 47km from lake
xsec at 48km from lake
xsec at 49km from lake
xsec at 50km from lake
xsec at 51km from lake
xsec at 52km from lake
xsec at 53km from lake
xsec at 54km from lake
xsec at 55km from lake
xsec at 56km from lake
xsec at 57km from lake
xsec at 58km from lake
2959.00 cumec 3120.00 cumec
2791.56 cumec
2792.05 cumec
12 minutes 12 minutes
4348 m
1525 m
V= 11.62 Mcum
V= 10.85 Mcum
D-25 m 4564 m
36 km
40 km
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
Ele
va
tio
n (m
)
Distance from right bank to left bank (m)
at 5 Km from Lake
at 10 km from lake
at 15 Km from lake
at 20 Km from Lake
at 25 Km from Lake
at 30 Km from Lake
at 35 Km from Lake
at 40 Km from Lake
at 45 Km from Lake
at 50 Km from Lake
at 55 Km from Lake
at 60 Km from Lake
at 65 Km from Lake
at 70 Km from Lake
at 75 Km from Lake
at 80 Km from Lake
at 85 Km from Lake
at 90 Km from Lake
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
00:57 02:09 03:21
Dis
cha
rge
m3/
s
Time (h)
Dam breach flood just down stream to lake
Bhutan
S.No
.
DATE RIVER BASIN LAKE CAUSE
OF GLOF
1 1957 Pho Chu Tarina Tso Not
known
2 1960 Pho Chu Unnamed Not
known
3 1960 Chamkhar Chu Bachamancha
Tso
Not
known
4 7 Oct 94 Pho Chu Luggye Tso Moraine
collapse
RECENT GLOF EVENTS - BHUTAN
Bhutan
S.No. DATE RIVER
BASIN
LAKE
CAUSE OF
GLOF
1 12 Jul 91 Tamakoshi Chubung Moraine collapse
2 3 Sep 98 Dudh Koshi Tam Pokhari Ice avalanche
3 15 Aug 03 Madi River Kabache Lake Moraine
collapse
4 8 Aug 04 Madi River Kabache Lake Moraine
collapse
RECENT GLOF EVENTS - NEPAL
METHODS FOR MITIGATING THE IMPACT OF GLOF
REDUCING THE VOLUME OF LAKE WATER
Possible peak surge discharge from a GLOF could be reduced
by reducing the volume of water in the lake. In general, any one
or combination of the following methods may be applied for
reducing the volume of water in the lake:
Controlled breaching
Controlled breaching can be carried out by blasting, excavation,
or even by dropping bombs from an aircraft.
Construction of an outlet control structure
For more permanent and precise control of lake outflows, rigid
structures made out of stone, concrete, or steel can be used.
Pumping or siphoning out the water from the lake, and
Making a tunnel through the moraine dam
Tunneling through moraines or debris barriers, although risky
and difficult because of the type of material blocking the lake,
has been carried out in several countries.
PREVENTATIVE MEASURES AROUND THE LAKE AREA
Any existing and potential source of a larger snow and
ice avalanche, slide, or rock fall around the lake area,
which has a direct impact on the lake and dam has to be
studied in detail. Preventative measures have to be
taken such as removing masses of loose rocks to
ensure there will be no avalanches into the lake.
Real-time monitoring, early warning systems and
preparedness education are the most beneficial ways to
minimize risk.
Preparedness –hazard mapping, improving
communication, education to create awareness
Glacier and snow-melt have major contribution to
the river flows in the region. It is necessary to
characterize the glaciers in different climatological
regions of the basin
The rate, volume and timing of snow melt are likely
to change, therefore, impact of climate change on the
snowmelt runoff and total streamflow of the large
Himalayan rivers should be investigated using GCMs
output as input to the calibrated hydrological
models.
Studies on the trend of changes in snow cover over
the Himalayas/basins along with retreat of glaciers
need immediate emphasis.
Concluding Remarks
Climate warming will increase the frequency and risk of
GLOFs
Regular mapping and monitoring of lakes are needed
Potentially dangerous glacial lakes must be provisionally
identified and prioritized for further investigation
Potentially dangerous lakes must be monitored on a
continuous basis
High resolution time series satellite image are useful for
this purpose
Appropriate measures to reduce the potential risks from
these lakes
Concluding Remarks
THANKS