Upload
garry-mcdaniel
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Social Engagement of Older AdultsAmazing Aging
GERN 474 – Maria Claver & Casey GoellerAlma Madrid, Lisa Medrano, Kim Pham, Michelle Prado & Lorrie Russell. May 3rd, 2010
Introduction
• Social engagement represents an active engagement with social world and implies that people are choosing to participate.
• Social aspects of aging: – Networks– Social Support– Participation
• Studies of physical health:– Disability – Morbidity– Mortality
Introduction cont …
• Social worlds contributes to physical health.• Networks
– Direct protection from mortality (men benefited from smaller networks than women)
• Support– Familial support predictor of mortality.– Reduced mortality risks.
• Participation/Social Engagement– Volunteering, Church Attendance & Socializing reduced mortality.
Introduction cont …
• Validated measures such as Brief Assessment of Social Engagement (BASE).
• Control:– Age (physical health may decline with age)– Sex (varies between men and women)– Physical Health (establish whether social participation is precursor for
mortality).
Methods
• Nottingham Longitudinal Study (NLSAA). • 8 year survey. • Conducted between May & September 1985. • Follow up interviews at 4 year intervals
Questionnaire
• 14 item health index from 0 (no health problems) – 14 (multiple health problems).
• Brief Assessment of Social Engagement measured levels of social participation.
• 13 item Life Satisfaction Index measure morale.
Participants
• 154 Participants who died 1985 – 1993 • 154 Still alive• Matched age, sex, & health index score. • By 1989 – 34 men & women had died.
Analysis
• Independent t-test.• Independent number was survival (alive or deceased) in 1993.• Social engagement & moral in 1984 & 1989 are dependent
variables.
Results
• T1 – 1985 – Difference found for social engagement .– Lower levels of social engagement [t(307) = 1.29, p<0.199] – No other independent variables were insignificant.
• T2 – 1989 – Difference found for social engagement [t(230) = -3.12, p<0.002]– Morale [t(225) = 2.64, p<0.01] – Health [t(226) = 2.39, p<0.02]
• T3 – 1993– Those who died by T3 had lower levels of social engagement, morale,
poorer health than those who were still alive.
Discussion• Direct effect .• Social engagement may have a direct effect on mortality when
health, age, & sex are controlled for. • Marker for later health problems. • Low levels signals unrecognized health problems.
Conclusion
• Low social engagement does not always determine mortality.• Social engagement may have a direct effect on mortality if:
– Age– Health – Sex Are controlled for.
Recommendations
• Consider what types of diseases/illness.– Some diseases will impede Older Adults from participating.
• Correlation between accessibility of social engagement.
Work Cited
Bennett, K. M. (2002). Low level social engagement as a precursor of mortality among people in later life. Age and Ageing, 31, 165-168.