SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX - Audit, Consulting, Advisory, and

SOCIAL PROGRESS

IMPERATIVE

SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX

Social Progress Index #socialprogress 2

Social Progress Index #socialprogress

ADVISORY BOARD

3

Scott Stern Professor of Technological Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management, MIT

Judith Rodin President, The Rockefeller Foundation

Michael E. Porter, Chair Bishop William Lawrence University Professor at the Harvard Business School.

Hernando de Soto President, Institute for Liberty and Democracy

Ngaire Woods Dean, Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford


SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX DESIGN PRINCIPLES


Nutrition and Basic Medical Care

Water and Sanitation

Shelter

Personal Safety

Access to Basic Knowledge

Access to Information and Communication

Health and Wellness

Environmental Quality

Personal Rights

Personal Freedom and Choice

Tolerance and Inclusion

Access to Advanced Education

Opportunity Foundations of Wellbeing Basic Human Needs

Social Progress Index Framework


Basic Human Needs Opportunity

Nutrition and Basic Medical Care §  Undernourishment §  Depth of food deficit §  Maternal mortality rate §  Child mortality rate §  Deaths from infectious diseases

Water and Sanitation §  Access to piped water §  Rural access to improved water source §  Access to improved sanitation facilities

Shelter §  Availability of affordable housing §  Access to electricity §  Quality of electric supply §  Household air pollution attributable deaths

Personal Safety §  Homicide rate §  Level of violent crime §  Perceived criminality §  Political terror §  Traffic deaths

Access to Basic Knowledge §  Adult literacy rate §  Primary school enrollment §  Lower secondary school enrollment §  Upper secondary school enrollment §  Gender parity in secondary enrollment

Access to Information and Communications §  Mobile telephone subscriptions §  Internet users §  Press Freedom Index

Health and Wellness §  Life expectancy at 60 §  Premature deaths from non-communicable

diseases §  Obesity rate §  Suicide rate

Environmental Quality §  Outdoor air pollution attributable deaths §  Wastewater treatment §  Greenhouse gas emissions §  Biodiversity and habitat

Personal Rights §  Political rights §  Freedom of speech §  Freedom of assembly/association §  Freedom of movement §  Private property rights

Personal Freedom and Choice §  Freedom over life choices §  Freedom of religion §  Early marriage §  Satisfied demand for contraception §  Corruption

Tolerance and Inclusion §  Tolerance for immigrants §  Tolerance for homosexuals §  Discrimination and violence against minorities

§  Religious tolerance §  Community safety net

Access to Advanced Education §  Years of tertiary schooling §  Women’s average years in school §  Inequality in the attainment of education §  Globally ranked universities §  Percentage of tertiary students enrolled in

globally ranked universities

Social Progress Index Complete Framework

Foundations of Wellbeing


INDICATOR DATA SOURCES Hard data

Expert analysis

Survey data

Rank Country Score Rank Country Score Rank Country Score Rank Country Score 1 Finland 90.09 35 Hungary 76.88 69 Bosnia and Herzegovina 65.84 103 Lesotho 52.39 2 Canada 89.49 36 Latvia 76.19 70 Dominican Republic 65.65 104 Iraq 52.28 3 Denmark 89.39 37 Israel 75.32 71 Jordan 65.43 105 Rwanda 51.91 4 Australia 89.13 38 Argentina 75.20 72 Bolivia 64.73 106 Swaziland 51.76 5 Switzerland 88.87 39 United Arab Emirates 73.69 72 Moldova 64.73 107 Uganda 50.69 6 Sweden 88.80 40 Mauritius 73.24 74 Lebanon 64.42 108 Benin 50.03 7 Norway 88.70 41 Panama 73.02 75 Russia 64.19 109 Tanzania 49.99 8 Netherlands 88.65 42 Romania 72.23 76 Kazakhstan 63.86 110 Myanmar 49.84 9 United Kingdom 88.58 43 Bulgaria 72.14 77 Azerbaijan 63.75 111 Congo, Republic of 49.74 10 Iceland 88.45 44 Jamaica 71.94 78 Nicaragua 63.03 112 Burkina Faso 49.34 10 New Zealand 88.45 45 Kuwait 71.84 79 Kyrgyzstan 62.91 113 Pakistan 49.13 12 Ireland 87.94 46 Brazil 71.70 80 Mongolia 62.80 114 Zimbabwe 49.11 13 Austria 86.60 47 Serbia 71.55 81 Venezuela 62.60 115 Togo 49.03 14 Japan 86.54 48 Colombia 70.84 82 Indonesia 62.27 116 Côte d'Ivoire 48.97 15 Germany 86.42 49 Peru 70.09 83 Sri Lanka 62.21 117 Mozambique 47.96 16 Belgium 86.19 50 Malaysia 70.08 84 China 62.10 118 Cameroon 47.22 17 Spain 85.88 51 Mexico 70.02 85 Namibia 62.01 119 Nigeria 46.49 18 France 84.79 52 Albania 69.78 86 Morocco 61.92 120 Djibouti 46.30 19 United States 84.62 53 Ecuador 69.56 87 Guatemala 61.68 121 Mali 46.24 20 Slovenia 84.27 54 Georgia 69.17 88 Algeria 61.18 122 Mauritania 46.08 21 Portugal 83.88 55 Montenegro 68.17 89 Egypt 60.74 123 Madagascar 45.91 22 Czech Republic 82.80 56 Tunisia 68.00 90 Honduras 60.64 124 Liberia 45.07 23 Estonia 82.62 57 Macedonia 67.88 91 Uzbekistan 60.49 125 Sierra Leone 44.22 24 Italy 82.49 58 Turkey 67.82 92 Ghana 60.37 126 Ethiopia 43.50 25 Chile 82.12 59 South Africa 67.60 93 Iran 59.45 127 Yemen 41.76 26 Korea, Republic of 80.92 60 Paraguay 67.44 94 Tajikistan 58.78 128 Guinea 41.66 27 Cyprus 80.75 61 Thailand 67.43 95 Nepal 57.40 129 Niger 41.63 28 Costa Rica 80.12 62 Botswana 67.03 96 Senegal 55.64 130 Angola 39.70 29 Uruguay 80.12 63 Ukraine 66.43 97 Cambodia 54.28 131 Chad 36.38 30 Poland 79.76 64 El Salvador 66.36 98 India 53.92 132 Afghanistan 35.89 31 Slovakia 78.96 65 Saudi Arabia 66.30 99 Kenya 53.72 133 Central African Republic 30.03 32 Greece 78.27 66 Belarus 66.18 100 Malawi 53.44 33 Croatia 77.68 67 Armenia 66.05 101 Bangladesh 52.73 34 Lithuania 76.94 68 Philippines 65.92 102 Laos 52.54

Very high social progress High social progress Upper middle social progress

Lower middle social progress

Low social progress

Very low social progress

SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX 2016 RESULTS


SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX VS GDP PER CAPITA



Basic Human Needs Opportunity

European Regional Social Progress Index Framework

Foundations of Wellbeing

Nutrition and Basic Medical Care 1. Premature mortality (<65) 2. Infant mortality 3. Unmet medical needs 4. Insufficient food Water and Sanitation 5. Satisfaction with water quality 6. Lack of toilet in dwelling 7. Uncollected sewage 8. Sewage treatment Shelter 9. Burdensome cost of housing 10. Satisfaction with housing 11. Overcrowding 12. Lack of adequate heating Personal Safety 13. Homicide rate 14. Safety at night 15. Traffic deaths

Access to Basic Knowledge 16. Upper-secondary enrolment rate 17. Lower secondary completion only 18. Early school leavers Access to Information and Communications 19. Internet at home 20. Broadband at home 21. Online interaction with public authorities Health and Wellness 22. Life expectancy 23. General health status 24. Standardized cancer death rate 25. Standardized heart disease death rate 26. Unmet dental needs 27. Satisfaction with air quality Environmental Quality 28. Air pollution-pm10 29. Air pollution-pm2.5 30. Air pollution-ozone 31. Pollution or grime 32. Protected land (Natura 2000)

Personal Rights 33. Trust in the political system 34. Trust in the legal system 35. Trust in the police 36. Quality of public services Personal Freedom and Choice 37. Freedom over life choices 38. Teenage pregnancy 39. Young people not in education,

employment or training 40. Corruption index Tolerance and Inclusion 41. Impartiality of government services 42. Tolerance for immigrants 43. Tolerance for minorities 44. Attitudes toward people with disabilities 45. Tolerance for homosexuals 46. Gender employment gap 47. Community safety net

Access to Advanced Education 48. Tertiary education attainment 49. Tertiary enrolment 50. Lifelong learning

11


EU REGIONAL SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX RESULTS MAP

Regions of the EU have widely different social progress results across levels of GDP

Regions with the highest GDPs per capita are not the top performers

12

>=8075-8070-7565-7060-6555-6050-5545-50<45



A TOOL FOR GOVERNMENT

14

European Union: DG Regio launched Social Progress Index for NUTS2 regions of EU on 11 October. The Index serves as a sounding board for the European Commission to assess whether the 2014-2020 Cohesion programs address the right issues in the right places. Currently working with pilot regions to use SPI as planning tool. Paraguay: First country to officially adopt the Social Progress Index as a national measure of performance, integrated into 2030 national development plan. SPI is being integrated into budget planning and performance management. Costa Rica: Cantonal Social Progress Index is being used by Vice-President’s Office to guide national social innovation strategy. State of Pará (Brazil): The data from SPI for Amazon region is being used as the foundation for the Governor’s social investment programmes. City of Bogota (Colombia): A district-level SPI for the city is being used as the basis for a cross-sector development platform for Bogota.


Coca-Cola and Natura are measuring citizen well-being at the community level in the Amazon rainforest. These areas and their communities are key for Coca-Cola and Natura’s supply chain. By using a localised Social Progress Index, they were able to identify the key areas of need, direct CR investment accordingly, engage local people, and demonstrate their positive impact on the area, while mitigating supply chain risk..

Cargill sponsored a community level index within an area where their poultry farms were set up 40 years ago. Cargill believe that as they have invested in the area for 40 years, the government now need to step up and contribute – they see a local index as a way of demonstrating priorities to the government and getting them to share the investment burden.

Breckinridge Capital Advisors This Boston-based investment fund has launched a new municipal bond analytics tool that uses the Social Progress Index framework to measure ‘inclusiveness’ alongside traditional economic metrics. Breckinridge says that this approach enables the firm to “emphasize inclusiveness as a potential key determinant of long-term investment performance”.

Bayer Healthcare’s Head of Corporate Communications and Public Affairs has been using the Social Progress Index to champion a new way of thinking about social responsibility within Bayer; a move away from supporting charitable projects, toward using Bayer's influence to leverage systemic change as measured by the Social Progress Index.

A TOOL FOR BUSINESS


A TOOL FOR COLLABORATION

16

•  Coca-Cola Brazil and Natura, Brazil's largest multinational cosmetics company, launched a groundbreaking social mapping project focused on Amazonian communities in collaboration with global market research company Ipsos.

•  The index provides a holistic framework and common language to assess joint programs in a given community and fuel collaboration among government, civil society and the private sector that drives social impact.

•  With the Communities SPI, Coca-Cola Brazil is working to use its business to promote local development and the generation of shared value, focused on the real needs of the population.

•  Actions that followed the index: •  Basic Sanitation and Water Program •  I College Program for Riverside Teachers in the Amazon within Conservation Units •  I Training Center for Sustainable Production Technicians at Conservation Units •  Structuring of the CAMPINA Rural Family Home •  Development of Young Leaders •  Construction of Piers in ROQUE community

Documents

SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX - Audit, Consulting, Advisory, and