4
Harry BLOCH (New York, U.S.A.) C5 SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND MEDICINE, MEDICAL EDUCATION AND MEDICAL STUDENTS IN FRANCE AND THE UNITED STATES (1820-1861) In this period, from 1820 to 1861, France attained superiority in medicine and medical education. The immediate cause was the French Revolution in 1789. It liberated the minds of men from a feudal society, and its intimidating, paralyzing, religious institutions. Poverty no longer stood in the path of careers in medicine and science. The door of medical schools were open to all who qualified ; and many penniless youths were able to achieve their cherished goals. Medical schools were now freed from the fetters of theology, scholasticism, and sacrosanct authority ; and hospital medicine was cultivated in place of endless philosophic discctur.se. Parallel to this trend was devotion to morbid anatomy to uncover the seat of disease and its relation to symptoms. « De sedibus » was avidly studied ; and the strangling theory of humors in the pathology of disease was discarded. Pinel and Bichat were among the first to express opposition to humoral imbalance as explanation for disease origin. Clinicians and surgeons, whose accomplishments place them among the best in the history of medicine, were the products of this new teaching, and became the distinguished professors of the medical schools and the great Paris Hospitals. Their roster reads like a page from Garrison's History of Medecine where they are inscribed : Andral, Chomel, Trousseau, Orfila, Magendie, Louis, Laennec, and a host of remarkabe surgeons : Lisfranc, Vel- peau. Roux, Larrey, and Dupuytren who inspired profound respect and awesome fear, and whose students pulled his casket in reverence and grief to Pere La Chaise cemetery. Medical students from almost every country converged on the Paris hospitals, which were free, and of many types : medical, surgical, venereal; for the old, the blind, the insane ; the incurable and for children, the first of its kind in the world. There were thirteen general and eleven specialty hospitals, and twelve hospices that made available over 20,000 patients, and a myriad of diseases to investigate. A plentiful supply of cadavers, obtainable for a few sous, gave access to normal and abnormal anatomy. Students had the stethoscope to explore the chest ; were taught diagnosis by use of eye, ear, and hand, saw mental patients liberated by Pinel from the cruelty of chains ; and acquired experience in obstetrics, dermatology, ophtalmology, neuro- logy, venereology, and chronic ailments. Perhaps, their most exciting experience was to observe mastersurgeons, noted for familiarity with normal and pathologic anatomy, perform intricate surgery with uncommon speed, dexterity, and skill, and without antisepsis and anaesthesia, yet undiscovered. American students, who numbered about 700, came from Philadelphia, Balti- more, New York, Virginia, Boston, and Charleston ; and returned to contribute to 106

SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND MEDICINE, MEDICAL EDUCATION … · MEDICAL EDUCATION AND MEDICAL STUDENTS IN FRANCE AND THE UNITED STATE(1820-1861S ) ... « De sedibus » was avidly studied

  • Upload
    doquynh

  • View
    229

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

H a r r y BLOCH ( N e w York , U.S.A.)

C5

SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND MEDICINE, MEDICAL EDUCATION AND MEDICAL STUDENTS

IN FRANCE AND THE UNITED STATES (1820-1861)

I n th is per iod, f rom 1820 to 1861, F r a n c e a t t a i n e d super io r i ty in med ic ine a n d m e d i c a l educa t ion . The i m m e d i a t e cause w a s t h e F r e n c h Revolu t ion in 1789. I t l ibe ra ted t h e m i n d s of m e n f rom a feudal society, a n d i ts i n t imida t ing , para lyzing, re l ig ious in s t i t u t ions . Pover ty n o longer s tood in t h e p a t h of c a r e e r s in m e d i c i n e a n d sc ience. T h e door of m e d i c a l schools w e r e open to all w h o qual i f ied ; a n d m a n y penni less y o u t h s w e r e able to achieve t h e i r che r i shed goals . Medica l schools w e r e n o w freed f rom the fe t t e r s of theology, scho las t i c i sm, a n d s a c r o s a n c t a u t h o r i t y ; a n d hosp i t a l med i c ine w a s cu l t i va t ed in p lace of end less phi losophic discctur.se.

Para l le l to th i s t r e n d w a s devot ion to m o r b i d a n a t o m y to u n c o v e r t h e sea t of d i sease a n d i t s r e l a t ion t o s y m p t o m s . « De sedibus » w a s avidly s t ud i ed ; a n d t h e s t r ang l ing t h e o r y of h u m o r s in t h e pa tho logy of d i sease w a s d i s ca rded . Pinel a n d B icha t w e r e a m o n g t h e f i r s t to express opposi t ion t o h u m o r a l i m b a l a n c e a s exp lana t ion for d i sease or igin. Cl inic ians a n d su rgeons , w h o s e a c c o m p l i s h m e n t s p lace t h e m a m o n g t h e bes t in t h e h i s to ry of med ic ine , w e r e t h e p r o d u c t s of th i s n e w teach ing , a n d b e c a m e t h e d i s t ingu i shed professors of t h e m e d i c a l schools a n d the g rea t P a r i s Hosp i t a l s . The i r r o s t e r r e a d s l ike a page f rom Gar r i son ' s H i s t o r y of Medec ine w h e r e they a re inscr ibed : Andra l , Chomel , T rousseau , Orfila, Magendie , Louis , Laennec , a n d a hos t of r e m a r k a b e su rgeons : Lisfranc, Vel-peau . Roux, Lar rey , a n d D u p u y t r e n w h o insp i red p ro found respec t a n d a w e s o m e fear, a n d w h o s e s t u d e n t s pul led h is ca ske t in r eve rence a n d grief to P e r e La Chaise ceme te ry .

Medica l s t u d e n t s f rom a l m o s t every c o u n t r y converged on t h e Pa r i s hospi ta l s , w h i c h w e r e free, a n d of m a n y types : med ica l , surgical , v e n e r e a l ; for t h e old, t h e b l ind , t h e i n sane ; t h e incurab le a n d for ch i ld ren , t h e f irs t of i t s k i n d in t h e wor ld . T h e r e w e r e t h i r t e e n genera l a n d eleven specia l ty hosp i t a l s , a n d twe lve hospices t h a t m a d e avai lable over 20,000 pa t i en t s , a n d a m y r i a d of d i seases t o inves t iga te . A plentiful supply of c adave r s , ob ta inab le for a few sous , gave access t o n o r m a l a n d a b n o r m a l a n a t o m y .

S t u d e n t s h a d t h e s t e thoscope to explore t h e ches t ; w e r e t a u g h t d iagnos is by u s e of eye, ear , a n d hand , s a w m e n t a l p a t i e n t s l ibe ra ted by Pinel f rom t h e c rue l ty of cha in s ; a n d acqu i red exper ience in obs te t r i c s , de rma to logy , ophta lmology , neuro­logy, venereology, a n d c h r o n i c a i l m e n t s . Pe rhaps , t he i r m o s t exc i t ing exper ience w a s t o observe m a s t e r s u r g e o n s , n o t e d for fami l ia r i ty w i t h n o r m a l a n d pa thologic a n a t o m y , p e r f o r m i n t r i c a t e su rge ry w i t h u n c o m m o n speed, dexter i ty , a n d skill, a n d w i t h o u t an t i seps is a n d anaes thes i a , ye t und i scove red .

A m e r i c a n s t u d e n t s , w h o n u m b e r e d abou t 700, c a m e f r o m Phi lade lph ia , Bal t i ­m o r e , N e w York, Virginia , Bos ton , a n d Char l e s ton ; a n d r e t u r n e d to con t r i bu t e to

106

a n e w e ra in med ic ine a n d su rge ry in Amer ica . They c a m e poorly equ ipped for t h e p rac t i ce of scientif ic m e d i c i n e ; possessed s can t knowledge of a n a t o m y , chemis t ry , pa thology, a n d physiology, a n d m a n y w e r e lack ing in p rac t i ca l c l inical exper ience .

Let u s n o w look over t h e shou lde r s of s o m e A m e r i c a n s in t he i r lodgings , s ea t ed a t a t a b l e i l l u m i n a t e d by cand le l ight , w r i t i n g h o m e a b o u t t h e i r exper iences . J a m e s J a c k s o n b o a s t s : « I e x a m i n e abou t 100 cases of l iving d i sease dai ly : a n d t h e i n t e r e s t i ng cases a r e w i t h o u t end . »

Oliver Wendel l H o l m e s w r i t e s : « I n less t h a n t w o m o n t h s I acqu i r ed a know­ledge of d i seases of t h e sk in t h a t a s t o n i s h e d myself. I have seen in a m o r n i n g 80 cases u n d e r t h e eyes of t h e f irs t a u t h o r i t y in t h e wor ld . »

J o n a t h a n M a s o n W a r r e n exa l t s : « I w a t c h e d D u p u y t r e n a m p u t a t e a n a r m , o n e of t he m o s t beaut i ful ope ra t ions I h a d seen : Roux r e m o v e c a n c e r f rom t h e face , cu t o u t a c ance rous e lbow jo in t , r e m o v e c a t a r a c t s , a m p u t a t e t h e n e c k of t h e u t e r u s , p e r f o r m l i tho t r i ty , a n d ope ra t e on fistula-in-ano a n d h e r n i a ; L a r r e y cau te r ize an u l ce r ; Civaie pe r fo rm rh inop las ty ; R icord c a s t r a t e a pa t i en t for t ube rcu lous tes t ic les ; a n d Lisf ranc r e m o v e t h e n e c k of t h e u t e r u s . »

Ashbel S m i t h is in a q u a n d r y : « T h e r e is so m u c h offered, a n d the g r e a t e s t difficulty is t h e select ion of cou r ses . I n Amer ica , I s ighed af te r oppor tun i t i e s for i m p r o v e m e n t . » H o l m e s advises : « B e c a u s e of t h e avai labi l i ty of subjec ts , one w h o k n o w s h o w to u s e h is h a n d s m a y b e c o m e a n exper t o p e r a t o r in a few w e e k s » ; a n d a d d s : « Fol low m e t o t h e Hote l Dieu w h e r e ru les a n d re igns t h e m a s t e r su rgeon of t h e day, t h e i l lus t r ious B a r o n Dupuy t ren . » W. W. G e r h a r d t l auds Louis : « A r e m a r k a b l e m a n , very different f rom phys ic ians f rom E n g l a n d a n d Amer i ca . »

René La Roche conc ludes : « The F r e n c h p lan of i n s t r u c t i o n is super io r to t h a t found in o u r schools ; a n d F r e n c h a n a t o m y , surgery , pa thology, a n d physiology a r e t h e best in t h e wor ld . »

E l i sha B a r t l e t t c o m p a r e s : « The fami l ia r i ty of d i s t ingu i shed phys ic ians a n d su rgeons w i t h t he i r s t u d e n t s c o n t r a s t e d w i t h t h e p r o u d a n d h a u g h t y ca r r i age of s o m e of o u r N e w E n g l a n d professors . » H e advises : « By u s ing s u c h r i g o r o u s empi r ica l m e t h o d s , A m e r i c a n s can b e c o m e fact-f inders i n s t e a d of pompous phraseo-logis ts . »

Ho lmes c o n t r i b u t e s a g lowing t r i b u t e : « The s t a n d a r d of m e d i c a l t e ach ing is such t h a t t he s t u d e n t m a y r e t u r n a m o r e r o u n d e d phys ic ian a t 25 t h a n m a n y w h o s l u m b e r e d till 60 in o u r languid , scient if ic a t m o s p h e r e . » P e t e r P o r c h e r c o n d e m n s : « Teach ing m e d i c i n e in t h e Uni ted S t a t e s is so m u c h of quacks , so l i t t le of sc ience, it is qu i te t r a sh . »

H o l m e s s u m m a r i z e s w h a t h e will b r ing h o m e f rom Par i s :

« Not to guess w h e n I c an know.

« Not to t a k e a u t h o r i t y w h e n I c an h a v e fac ts .

« Not to t h i n k a m a n m u s t t a k e phys ic because h e is sick. » Pa r i s w a s n o t only t h e apogee of w o r l d m e d i c i n e t o A m e r i c a n s t u d e n t s , bu t

an exci t ing ci ty of Gallic r e f inemen t , pol i tness , a n d cu l tu re , of t h e a t r e , a r t , m u s i c , l i t e r a tu re , d r a m a , opera a n d m u s e u m s . Char les T h o m a s J a c k s o n no tes , « T h e F r e n c h a r e pol i te a n d u r b a n e . »

J a m e s Young Basse t t , Osier ' s A l a b a m a S t u d e n t , accep ts a n ex te resh ip u n d e r Velpeau, a n d a s s u r e s M r s . B a s s e t t t h a t a l t hough th i s good f o r t u n e wil l p ro long his s tay in Pa r i s , it wil l , a lso , « keep h i m ou t of b a d c o m p a n y ».

H o l m e s rev iewing Pa r i s i an e n t i c e m e n t s pledges : « To t a k e h is w o r k w i t h

107

all h i s migh t , a n d h is p l easu res very m o d e r a t e l y . » This , apparen t ly , w a s t h e fine ba l ance adop ted by all h i s c o m p a t r i o t s . T h e r e w e r e n o s canda l s .

I t is i m p o r t a n t to u n d e r s t a n d w h y A m e r i c a n m e d i c a l s t u d e n t s left t h e i r c o u n t r y a n d u n d e r t o o k a difficult, h a z a r d o u s sea voyage a t t h a t t i m e to s t u d y in F r a n c e .

F o r m a n y it w a s cost ly, involved sacr i f ices , a n d a long pe r iod of sepa ra t ion f rom family .

The Amer i can med ica l scene in t h e 19th c e n t u r y w a s , in l a rge pa r t , b a r r e n a n d depress ing . Prof i table p rop r i e t a ry schools mul t ip l i ed a n d o p e r a t e d w i t h o u t r e s t r a i n t n o r b a r r i e r s to a d m i s s i o n ; a n d the c u r r i c u l u m provided, a t t h e h ighes t fee ob ta inab le , a se r ies of s h o r t l e c tu r e cou r se s over a t w o y e a r per iod . P rac t i ca l i n s t r u c t i o n w a s usua l ly lacking, a n d l imi t ed hosp i ta l facil i t ies p r ec luded observa­t ion of s ick pa t i en t s . F e w schools p rov ided n o r m a l o r pa thologica l a n a t o m y , s ince the avai labi l i ty of c a d a v e r s w a s severely l imi t ed d u e to w i d e s p r e a d opposi t ion t o d issect ion. A g r a d u a t e w h o sough t p rac t i ca l c l inical exper ience , b e c a m e a n app ren t i ce for t w o yea r s , a n d accompan ied a p recep to r a n dai ly s ick cal ls .

To t h e s ince re phys ic ian en t e r ing t h e p rac t i ce of med ic ine , d iscovery of w i d e s p r e a d q u a c k e r y a n d i ncompe tence w a s d i s t r e s s i n g ; a n d equal ly painful w a s t h e publ ic d u s t r u s t a n d c o n t e m p t for physic a n d phys ic ians .

As ear ly a s 1818, J o h n S t e r n s , p r e s iden t of t h e N e w York Medica l Society, a s se r t ed , « w i t h few except ions p rac t i t i one r s w e r e ignoran t , d e g r a n d e d , a n d con tempt ib le ».

S a m u e l D. Gross , a d i s t ingu i shed su rgeon a n d pa thologis t , ca l led it , « a hope­less s i t ua t ion ».

N a t h a n i e l C h a p m a n , f irs t p r e s iden t of t h e A m e r i c a n Medica l Associa t ion , p r o c l a i m e d : « The profess ion h a s b e c o m e co r rup t a n d d e g e n e r a t e a r i s ing f rom t h e r e a d y a d m i s s i o n of ind iv idua l s by w h o m it is d e b a s e d . » Wil l iam H . Welch t hough t , « t h e r e w a s no prospec t for i m p r o v e m e n t ».

This b a r r e n per iod in m e d i c a l e d u c a t i o n a n d sc ience w a s , in g rea t pa r t , t h e r e su l t of u n c h e c k e d , l imi t less free en t e rp r i s e . I t began in 1800 w h e n m a c h i n e s rep laced m a n power in m a n u f a c t u r i n g . The I n d u s t r i a l Revolut ion , in t i m e , t r ans ­f o r m e d the Uni ted S t a t e s f rom a hand ic ra f t , a g r i c u l t u r a l e c o n o m y in to t h e lead ing i n d u s t r i a l n a t i o n in t h e wor ld . I t s g r o w t h a n d expans ion in t h e 19th c e n t u r y w a s possible w i t h doc t r i ne s of laissez-faire t h a t r e a c h e d only for r u t h l e s s power , money , a n d u n c h e c k e d ind iv idua l i sm r ega rd l e s s of i t s mora l , physical , environ­m e n t a l , o r h e a l t h consequences .

A m o u n g i ts casua l t i e s w e r e educa t ion , med i c ine a n d m e d i c a l educa t ion , sc ience, a n d the essen t ia l r egu la t ions in the p rac t i ce of med i c ine for publ ic p ro tec t ion . S h a t t u c k in 1845, decr ied t h e affect « on t h e h e a l t h of t h e popula t ion of th is r eck l e s s specu la t ion a n d t h i r s t for w e a l t h in A m e r i c a ».

S iger i s t bel ieved, « p r o p r i e t a r y m e d i c a l schools w e r e a n express ion of a soc ie ty t h a t wor sh ipped pr inciples of u n c h e c k e d free en te rp r i s e a n d u n l i m i t e d laissez-faire, a n d n o t so m u c h t h e re su l t of e m e r g e n c y a n d need of doc to r s ». H e a l so t h o u g h t t h a t in th i s pe r iod « w h o e v e r gave u p m o n e y - m a k i n g to live for sc ience w a s cons ide red a c r a n k » . Welch w a s r e g a r d e d as too i n c o m p e t e n t t o p r a c t i c e med ic ine and , hence , h is choice of l abora to ry med ic ine a s a ca ree r .

F o r t u n a t e l y , t o w a r d s t h e e n d of t h e 19th cen tu ry , a m o r e efficient govern­m e n t a b a n d o n e d laissez-faire ; a n d funds e s t ab l i shed b y m o r e rea l i s t i c f inanc ie r s m a d e possible A b r a h a m Flexner ' s d r a m a t i c Bul le t in n u m b e r 4 in 1910, w h i c h g radua l ly l iqu ida ted a n d e leva ted m e d i c a l schools a n d m e d i c a l educa t ion .

108

R E F E R E N C E S

1 JONES R. M. — American doctors and the Parisian medical world, 1830-1840, Bull. Hist. Med., XLVII, n° 1, pp. 40-60, n° 2, pp. 177-205, 1973.

2. Ibid. — American doctors in Paris, 1820-1861, J. Hist. Med., 25, pp. 143-157, 1970. 3. SHYROCK R. H. — Medicine and Society in America, 1660-1860, New York, N.Y.

University Press, 1960, p. 127. 4. OSLER W. — The Alabama Student, Oxford University Press, London, Humphrey

Milford, 1926. 5. ACKERKNECHT E . H . — Elisha Bartlett and the philosophy of the Paris clinical

school, Bull. Hist. Med., 24, pp. 43-60, 1950. 6. Ibid. —• Medicine in the Paris Hospital, 1794-1848, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press, 1967. 7. LA ROCHE R. — Account of the origin, progress, and present stage of the medical

school of Paris, Am. J. Med Sci., 8, pp. 109-125, 401-418, 1831, and pp. 351-388, 1832. 8. The Parisian Education of an American Surgeon : Letters of Jonathan Mason Warren

(1832-1835). Notes and introduction by Rüssel M. Jones, Philadelphia, The American Philosophical Society, 1978.

9. BLOCH H. — P. C. A. Louis, Influence on American Medicine, 69, New York State, J. Med., Dec. 1, 1969.

10. MORSE J. T. — Life and Letters of O. W. Homes, London, Sampson Law, 1896. 11. BLOCH H. — Medical research and education in 19th century America, N.Y. State,

. Med., 74, pp. 1071-1074, June 1074.

109