Upload
tadcp
View
401
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Honorable Peggy DavisGeneral SessionThursday, December 12
Citation preview
SPECIALIZED DOCKETS
Targeting Drug CourtDockets Based onRisk/Need Assessment
Resource
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D.
Chief of Science, Law & Policy
National Association of Drug Court Professionals
Objectives
Identify the appropriate population for thetraditional drug court docket.
Determine whether alternative dockets areappropriate for drug court.
If so,What are appropriate alternative dockets look like?How do you determine who is appropriate foralternative dockets?What services should be offered in each docket?
Alternative Dockets
Mental Health Court
DWI Court
Veteran’s Court
Family/Juvenile Treatment Court
Alternative Drug Court Tracks
Traditional Drug CourtTen Key Components
Eighty percent of offenders have substanceinvolvement.
One-half to one-third meet the criteria forsubstance abuse or dependence resulting in aseven-fold increase in continuing to engage inpattern of criminal offending.
The goal is to match drug offenders to dispositionsthat balances cost, public safety and the welfare ofthe offender.
Traditional Drug Court
Research indicates which type of adult offendersare most in need of the full complement ofservices embodied in the Ten Key Components.
However, many low need low risk offenders wouldhave no alternative to incarceration if access to adrug court program is denied.
As a result, it becomes important to designdifferent tracks to accommodate the low risk lowneed offender.
Assessment of Risks andNeeds
Three basic factors:Risk of DangerousnessPrognostic RisksCriminogenic Needs
Predicts the most effective and cost-efficientdisposition
Risk of Dangerousness
Goal: “To protect citizens from violent orpredatory offenders.”
Restrictive dispositions
Eventually released back into the community
Step-down for continued supervision
“Max’ed out” No authority to monitor andcontrol behavior.
Prognostic Risks
Characteristics of offenders that predict pooreroutcomes in standard rehabilitation programs:
Risk: Not a risk for violence or dangerousness,rather a risk of failing to respond to standardinterventions, and for continuing to engage in thesame level of drug abuse and crime as in the past.
The higher the risk – More intense services
Prognostic Risk FactorsYounger age
Male
Early onset of substance abuse or delinquency
Prior felony convictions
Unsuccessful attempts at treatment orrehabilitation
Co-existing of antisocial personality disorder
Antisocial peers or affiliations
Criminogenic Needs
Clinical disorders or functionalimpairments that, if ameliorated,substantially reduce the likelihood ofcontinued engagement in crime.
Criminogenic Needs
Substance Dependence or Addiction
Bing PatternCravings or compulsionWithdrawal symptoms
Abstinence is a distal goal
Criminogenic Needs
Substance Abuse
o Compliance is a proximal goal
Collateral needso Dual diagnosis
o Chronic medical conditions (HIV, diabetes)o Homelessness chronic unemployment
Shaping
Principle governing effective behavioral change
Proximal Goals: Behaviors clients are alreadycapable of engaging in and that are necessaryfor long term change.
Distal Goals: Behaviors that are the behaviorsthat ultimately desired, but may take some timeto accomplish.
Responses
The magnitude or severity of the sanctionshould be higher for proximal behaviors andlower for distal behaviors.
Low-level sanctions for failing to fulfill easyobligations can lead to habituation – theoffender becomes accustomed to beingpunished.
Can make behavior worse.
Responses
High magnitude sanctions for failing to meetdifficult demands that are beyond hiscapabilities can lead to hostility, depressionand a disruption of the therapeuticrelationship.
Ceiling effect: Once options have beenexhausted further efforts to improve behaviorwill be extremely challenging.
Quadrant OneHigh Risk/High Need
Drug or alcohol dependence
Severe mental illness
Deficiencies in adaptive functioning
Poor prognosis for success in standardtreatment or rehabilitation
High Risk/High Need
Negative risk factors:Early onset of delinquency or substanceabuseAntisocial personality traits
Previous failures in rehabilitationPreponderance of antisocial peers
High Risk/High Need
Status Calendar
Intensive TreatmentAmeliorate cravings and withdrawalsymptoms
Concrete skills to resist drugs and alcoholCoping strategies to deal with life’s stressors
High Risk/High Need
Compliance is proximal for basic supervisionrequirements:
Showing up for treatment or UA
Failing to appear for Court
Tampering with urine samples
Restrictive consequences: Most of these offendershave habituated to punishment and will engage insubstance abuse despite negative consequences.
Positive reinforcement can cultivate pro-socialbehaviors that can compete against substanceabuse.
Responses
Positive Reinforcement: The offender can beexpected to return to substance abuse unlesshas found a new job developed hobbies,cultivated healthy social relationships, orengaged in other pro-social activities.
Put feeling aside and offer rewards for engagingin good behaviors that portend better long-term adjustment.
Responses
Agonist Medications
Allows addicted individual to function safely andeffectively while performing daily chores androutines.
Methadone – Buprenorphine -
Quadrant TwoLow Risk/High Need
Drug/Alcohol dependence
Severe mental illness
Poor adaptive skills
Does not have negative risk factors that wouldpredict a poor response to standard treatment.
Low Risk/High Need
Noncompliance Calendar:They should focus energies on treatment. However, ifthey fail to attend treatment there should be a swiftcourt consequence.
Intensive Treatment:Treatment is proximal: Failing to attend treatmentshould trigger a noncompliance court appearances.
Clean drug tests are distal:Early on dirty tests should be met with a more intensemodality of care.
Low Risk/High Need
Positive reinforcement: This population hasalso experienced a ceiling effect or habituationto punishment. Therefore it is important touse positive reinforcement.
Agonist Medications
This population can perform adequately inprobation-without-verdict dispositions.
Quadrant ThreeHigh Risk/Low Need
Does not have drug or alcohol dependence, severemental illness or deficient adaptive skills.
Has negative risk factors for failure in traditionalcorrectional rehabilitation programs:
Antisocial character traitsPrior failures on supervision
Deviant peer affiliations
High Risk/Low Need
Status Calendar
Pro-social Rehabilitation: Focus on altering theoffenders’ distorted perceptions, think beforethey act and consider the consequences of theiractions and build empathy for others.
Vocational preparation
Education
High Risk/Low Need
Abstinence and compliance are proximal
Low-level sanctions are merely “the cost ofdoing business”
Higher magnitude sanctions should beadministered at the outset to rapidly squelchsubstance abuse.
Higher level of response for noncompliancewith other basic requirements
High Risk/Low Need
Restrictive Consequences for failure to complywith supervision may require restrictiveconsequences to protect public safety. Theseresponses may include in-home-detention,EMP
Antagonist Medications: Block the effects ofillicit drugs while providing no intoxication oftheir own.
No treatment
Quadrant FourLow Risk/Low Need
Naïve to criminal justice system and the substanceabuse treatment system.
Do not suffer from addictions or other impairments
Do not have negative risk factions that would portendfailure in standard interventions.
Noncompliance docket
Prevention services
Abstinence is proximal
Adjusting Tracks
No assessment took is perfectly reliable andvalid
A participants subsequent performance in theprogram should serve as a guide for adjustingthe conditions of the program.
Adaptative Interventions: Pre-specified criteriafor determining when and how to adjustservices in response to participant’sperformance.
Mental Health Court
Generally appropriate for the severely andpersistently mentally ill offender.
This population generally suffers from anAxis I disorder.
These offenders are unable to maintain a stablelife style without significant assistance, andtherefore would be unable to complete therequirements of a traditional drug courtdocket.
Mental Health CourtEligibility
Who?
Axis I?
Personality disorders?
Low functioning?
Head injury?
What resources do you have?
Program Requirements
Maintain stability in order to completeprobation.
Develop access to resources in order to maintainstable life after completing the program.
Expectations may be tempered by a realizationthat this population may not be able to completethe requirements of traditional drug court.
Individualization is critical.
DWI Court
The DWI offender often scores low onrisk/need assessments, yet presents a significantpublic safety risk.
Offenders generally do not have otherinvolvement in the criminal justice system.
This population seems to do better with standalone treatment and court dockets.
Additional Dockets
Veteran’s Court
Family Dependency Treatment Court
Juvenile Drug Court
Breakout Session Group One
Traditional Drug Court: Quadrant One - HighRisk/High Need
Eligibility criteria.
Program structure.
Review responses to behaviors. (considerproximal and distal goals)
Breakout Session Group Two
Drug Court Alternative Track: Quadrant TwoLow Risk/High Need
Eligibility criteria.
Program structure.
Responses to behaviors. (consider proximaland distal goals)
Breakout session Group Three
Alternative Drug Court Track: Quadrant ThreeHigh Risk/Low Need
Eligibility criteria.
Program structure.
Responses to behaviors. (consider proximaland distal goals)
Breakout Session Group Four
Alternative Drug Court Track: Quadrant FourLow Risk/Low Need
Eligibility criteria.
Program structure.
Responses to behaviors. (consider proximaland distal goals)
Breakout Session Group Five
Additional tracks:
Identify possible additional tracks, such as mentalhealth court, DWI court.
Will program requirements need to be adjusted?
Will responses to behavior need to be adjusted?
Are there requirements that should apply to allprograms?
Breakout Session Group Six
Adaptive Interventions:
Develop a set of guidelines that will trigger anadaptive intervention. For example, missing apre-determine number of counseling sessionsmight trigger a reassignment to another docket.Consider alternate drug court tracks, and otheroptions such as mental health court, DWIcourt.