Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
STEPPING STONE STEPPING STONE PROJECTPROJECT
designing a new engineering discipline
presented byteam 1
Overview
Introduction
Top 3 Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Project Definition & Goal
New Project DefinitionDesign a collection of knowledge to meet a rising demand for new technologies, ideologies, fields, and needs
Goals
Train students’ analytical thinkingPrepare student with strong technical &
scientific backgroundUseful for society
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Potential Users
Students
Faculty
Companies/Prospective market
Public
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Constraints
Hard to be accepted by public
Limited resources due to lack of history in this new field
Lack of support from faculty and low student enrollment
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Design Process
Define Redefine the problem Identify constraints and goals Characterize user types
Research Online research based on their interests Think “why (and how) all engineering majors
were created at the first place?”
Brainstorm Generate 100 great ideas
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Design Process
Vote Eliminate crazy ideas Vote top 10 ideas
Focus Refine our major based on Professor Goldberg’s
feedback
Delegate Divide into 3 subgroups based on their personal
interest/knowledge Each subgroup refines one major
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Design Process
Prototype Detailed description of each major
Test Survey
Refine Update and choose our best design
Present
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Designing a New Major
Conservative DesignEnergy Management Engineering
Intermediate DesignAviation & Technology Engineering
Radical DesignSecurity Engineering
Survey
Chosen Major
Top 3Designs
Introduction
ENERGY MANAGEMENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT ENGINEERINGENGINEERING
Energy Management Engineering
Methods of conserving energy
Increasing our nation’s energy supplies & security
Use of mathematical & finance models
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Pros
Maintain healthy economy & environment
Existing courses & faculties
Cons
Scope of topics is too broad Top
3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Evaluation
Competition within U.S.A. & worldwide New York Institute of TechnologyUniversity of Missouri – Columbia
Impossible to make it a 4-year degree program
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
AVIATION & AVIATION & TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERINGENGINEERING
Aviation & Technology Engineering
Aeronautical TechnologyAircraft ScienceElectrical System
Aviation Administration TechnologyAirport & Airline Management
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Pros
Diverse employment opportunities
Various graduates programs
Cons
Limited facilities
Lack of core classes in UCB
Expensive technical lab
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approval needed
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Evaluation
CompetitionStanford UniversityUCLAPurdue University
Creates many opportunities
Require a great amount of funding
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
SECURITY ENGINEERINGSECURITY ENGINEERING
Security Engineering
Building dependable system in the face of malice
Cross disciplinary with: Cryptography Physical technology security Computer security Applied psychology Societal processes
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Fields of Application
Computer SecurityDesign secured computer system
through software and hardware
Physical SecurityAnalyze & design a facility system
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Pros
High chance of government funding
UCB has enough resources
Cons
High risk investment
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Evaluation
No direct competition within U.S.A. & worldwide
Needs time to develop
Increasing job opportunities
Top 3Designs
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
SURVEY ANALYSISSURVEY ANALYSIS
Purpose
To provide quantitative information regarding
the main factor that the target group consider when choosing their major
the targets’ interests towards each of our three designed majors
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Procedure
Random Sampling Distributed questionnaires to
students at College Park High School (12 out of 20) Diablo Valley College (20 out of 40) UC- Berkeley (21 out of 25)
8 (38%) were from students with undeclared major
13 (62%) were from students with a major
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Questionnaire
Questions regarding students background:Level of educationAgeGender Intended or current major
Choose the main factor that influences them when deciding on a major
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Questionnaire
Rate their interests toward: (Given the definition)
Energy Management EngineeringAviation and Technology EngineeringSecurity EngineeringSurve
y
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Survey Results & Analysis
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Distribution of the 53 returned samples
12 from CPHS23%
20 from DVC37%
8 from UNUCB
15%
13 from MUCB
25%
Fig 1. The distribution of the samples
Survey Results & Analysis
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Sample distribution of each groups by factors
02468
101214161820
1. J
obop
port
uniti
es
3.P
aren
ts/P
eer
influ
ence
5. D
iffic
ulty
leve
l of t
heco
urse
s
7.O
ther
s
Factors
Fre
qu
ency
CPHS
DVC
UNUCB
MUCB
TOTAL
Fig 2. The students’ main concern when they were choosing a major
Survey Results & Analysis
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Fig 3. Average Interest Level of each major by each target group
3.5
2.7
4.23.9
4.3
2.4 2.3
3.1 3.3
4.7
3.9
4.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
Rate
Energy ManagementEngineering
Aviation & TechnologyEngineering
Security Engineering
CPHS DVC UNUCB MUCB
Survey Results & Analysis
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Fig 4. Average interest level of each major by different age ranges
3.33
4.13.6
2.9
4.6
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
44.5
5
Energy ManagementEngineering
Aviation & TechnologyEngineering
Security Engineering
Ra
te
age range of 15-20 age range of 21-25
2.6
3.73.3
2.8
4.8
3.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
Rate
Energy ManagementEngineering
Aviation &TechnologyEngineering
Security Engineering
Male
Female
Survey Results & Analysis
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Fig 5. Average interest level of each major by genders
Average interest level of each major by different majorsTechnical majors
Biological Sciences Physical Sciences Engineering & etc.
Non-technical majors Business Arts and Humanities Social Sciences Law
Other majors
Survey Results & Analysis
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Survey Results & Analysis
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
3.1
3.7
4.9
3
2.1
3.6 3.84.2
2.9
0
1
2
3
4
5
Rate
Technical majors Non-Technical majors Others
Energy Management Engineering Aviation & Technology Engineering Security Engineering
Fig 6. Average interest level of each majors by students with different majors
Survey Results & Analysis
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Fig 7. Average interest level of each majors in general
3.1 2.98
4.23
0
1
2
3
4
5
Energy ManagementEngineering
Aviation & TechnologyEngineering
Security Engineering
Majors
Rat
e
According to our survey results and analysisStudents choose their major according to
job opportunity of the major personal interest towards the major
Security Engineering chosen as our top design because
highest overall interest level rated by the sampled students
high job demand for security related field in the recent market
Conclusion
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Security Engineering Requirement
All basic Physics Math requirements Computer Science & Electrical
Engineering department Additional
PsychologySenior Project in Security Engineering
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Security Engineering Focus Computer Security
CS classes Additional
Privacy, Security, and Cryptography
Security in Computer System
Independent Study
Physical Security
Electrical E. classes Civil E. classes Architecture classes Additional
Independent Study
Survey
Chosen Major
Introduction
Top 3Designs
Timeline
ID Task Name Start End DurationMar 2003
4/63/30 4/132/16 4/274/203/22/9 3/162/23
1 5d2/28/20032/24/2003Define
2 5d3/7/20033/3/2003Research
3 5d3/14/20033/10/2003Brainstorm
4 3d3/25/20033/21/2003Vote
5 3d3/27/20033/25/2003Focus
Apr 2003Feb 2003
3/9 3/23
6 3/31/2003 1d3/31/2003Delegate
10
7
9
8
4/8/2003 5d4/2/2003Prototype
4/21/2003 5d4/15/2003Test
4/24/2003 3d4/22/2003Redefine
5/5/2003 7d4/25/2003Present
May 2003
5/4 5/11
Thank You!
