Upload
hamish-houston
View
28
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Stock Selection in Korea. Beyond Efficient Frontier Capital Management Onthida Boonpiamsak Pab Jotikasthira Jeongsik Lee Neal Triplett Jaekeun Yoon. Agenda. Sorting method and attributes for screening Diagnostics Factor/portfolio selection Optimization Conclusion. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Stock Selection in Korea
Beyond Efficient Frontier Capital Management
Onthida Boonpiamsak
Pab Jotikasthira
Jeongsik Lee
Neal Triplett
Jaekeun Yoon
Agenda
• Sorting method and attributes for screening
• Diagnostics
• Factor/portfolio selection
• Optimization
• Conclusion
Sorting MethodAttributes for Screening
We used sorting method in stock selection:
Univariate Attributes
•Dividend yield
•Earning growth
•Projected Earnings Growth
•Projected P/E
•ROE
•Reinvestment Rate
•Momentum (1mo., 1yr.)
•Cash Flow to Price
•Earnings to Price
•Book to Price
•Revenue Growth
Bivariate Attributes
•BV/P and MCAP
•Dividend yield and Earning growth
•Dividend yield and Projected EY
Diagnostics
Performance Measurement• Average return and excess returns over market and risk-free
• % Periods > Market
• % Periods with positive return
• Average ranking score
Consistency Measurement• Standard deviations of returns and excess returns
• Year by year ranking score
Factor /Portfolio Selection
Significant Attributes• CF/P• E/P• PPE• ROE• RIR• BV/P and MCAP• DY and PPE
Korean Stock Market (6/93-5/98)Korean Stock Market
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
Jun-93
Aug-93
Oct-93
Dec-93
Feb-94
Apr-94
Jun-94
Aug-94
Oct-94
Dec-94
Feb-95
Apr-95
Jun-95
Aug-95
Oct-95
Dec-95
Feb-96
Apr-96
Jun-96
Aug-96
Oct-96
Dec-96
Feb-97
Apr-97
Jun-97
Aug-97
Oct-97
Dec-97
Feb-98
Apr-98
$1 I
nve
ste
d
Factor/Portfolio Selection
Diagnostic Top Middle Bottom
Average excess returnover market
12.7% -6.0% -13.2%
Standard deviation ofexcess return
14.31% 17.29% 17.91%
% Periods > Market 69.49% 35.59% 42.37%
Average ranking score 1.4 2.4 2.2
Cash Flow/Price
Factor/Portfolio Selection
Diagnostic Top Middle Bottom
Average excess returnover market
8.7% 1.0% -9.1%
Standard deviation ofexcess return
13.71% 16.15% 17.04%
% Periods > Market 61.02% 57.63% 40.68%
Average ranking score 1.2 2.2 2.6
Earning/Price
Factor/Portfolio Selection
Diagnostic Top Middle Bottom
Average excess returnover market
12.1% 4.3% -17.0%
Standard deviation ofexcess return
14.11% 16.84% 12.98%
% Periods > Market 62.71% 61.02% 40.68%
Average ranking score 1.4 2.0 2.6
Prospective Price/Earning
Factor/Portfolio Selection
Diagnostic Top Middle Bottom
Average excess returnover market
9.5% 2.8% -12.9%
Standard deviation ofexcess return
14.15% 16.15% 20.59%
% Periods > Market 67.80% 66.10% 39.98%
Average ranking score 1.4 1.6 3.0
Return On Equity
Factor/Portfolio Selection
Diagnostic Top Middle Bottom
Average excess returnover market
9.5% -0.6% -10.1%
Standard deviation ofexcess return
14.49% 16.56% 16.75%
% Periods > Market 66.10% 54.24% 49.15%
Average ranking score 1.2 2.0 2.8
RIR
Factor/Portfolio Selection
Diagnostic Top Middle Bottom
Average excess returnover market
5.9% -11.3% -20.2%
Standard deviation ofexcess return
20.34% 18.75% 24.3%
% Periods > Market 61.02% 40.68% 45.76%
Average ranking score 1.2 2.6 2.2
Low Book Value/price Sorted by MCAP
Factor/Portfolio Selection
Diagnostic Top Middle Bottom
Average excess returnover market
15.4% -10.3% -15.6%
Standard deviation ofexcess return
23.75% 20.58% 23.09%
% Periods > Market 55.93% 37.29% 42.37%
Average ranking score 1.4 2.4 2.2
Low Dividend Yield Sorted by Projected P/E
Optimization
Match market volatility and maximize return: Weight Weight
(Top) (Bottom)
BV/P and DY -0.20 0.32
CF/P 0.37 -0.20
E/P -0.02 0.00
PPE 0.43 0.07
ROE 0.38 0.11
RIR -0.20 -0.06
Optimization
In-sample performance:
• Beat market by 0.96% per month on average.
• Beat market 68.75% of the time.
Out-of-sample test on 11-month data:
• Beat market by 2.83% per month on average.
• Beat market 72.73% of the time.
Conclusion
• Significant attributes in selecting stocks include CF/P, E/P, PPE, ROE, RIR, and BV/P and dividend yield together.
• In Korea, stock selection (by sorting method) can help improve performance.
• One important finding is that top fractiles tend to have high correlations with one another; hence, we may need to use bottom fractiles to reduce volatility.