42
Strategic Prevention Framework – State Incentive Grant Safe Streets Coalition

Strategic Prevention Framework – State Incentive Grant

  • Upload
    ofira

  • View
    52

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Strategic Prevention Framework – State Incentive Grant. Safe Streets Coalition. Shawnee County. 174,709 people Rural/Urban population Strong Coalition 6 School districts 9 private schools. Seaman . Rossville. Silver Lake. Shawnee Heights. 501. Washburn Rural. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Strategic Prevention Framework –

State Incentive Grant

Safe Streets Coalition

Page 2: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Shawnee Heights

Washburn Rural501

Seaman

Silver Lake

Rossville

Shawnee County 174,709 people

Rural/Urban population

Strong Coalition

6 School districts

9 private schools

Page 3: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

2008 2009 2010 2011 target 2012

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.027.1 28.1 28.0

24.6

21.1

%

Targeted Prevalence OutcomesPast 30 Day Use

30 day use: -2.5% 2008 27.1%2009 28.1%

2010 28.0%

2011 24.6%

Right Direction

-2.5%

Page 4: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

2008 2009 2010 20110.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.018.0

14.5 15.4 15.2

12.0

%

Targeted Prevalence Outcomes Binge Drinking

Binge Drinking: -2.5%2008 14.5%2009 15.4%

2010 15.2%

2011 12.0%Right

Direction-2.5%

Page 5: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Targeted Influencing FactorPerception of Being Caught

2008 2009 2010 2011 Target 2012

293031323334353637

32.331.5 31.5

34.1

36

%Right

Direction +1.8%

Perception of Being Caught: +1.8%2008 32.3%

2009 31.5%2010 31.5%2011 34.1%

Page 6: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Targeted Influencing FactorLow Academic Achievement

RightDirection -

- 2.5%

2008 2009 2010 2011 201235

36

37

38

39

40

41

4241.1

39.5

41.2

38.6

37.1

Low Academic Achievement: -2.5%2008 41.1%2009 39.5%2010 41.2%

2011 38.6%

Page 7: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Targeted Influencing Factor Opportunity For Pro-Social Involvement

Exceeds+6.5%

2008 2009 2010 2011 201258

60

62

64

66

68

70

61.7

64.8 64.4

68.2 67.7

Chart Title

%

Pro Social Involvement: +6.5%2008 61.7%2009 64.8%2010 64.4%2011 68.2%

Page 8: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Shawnee County CTC Overall Participation Rate

Exceeds+7%

2008 2009 2010 201165

70

75

80

85

90

7477

8587 Participation Rate: +7

2008 74%2009 77%

2010 85%2011 87%

Page 9: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Total Numbers ImpactedProgram # Participating

Enforcement/Saturation Patrols 804

CMCA, Advocacy & Enforcement 173,387

Positive Action 5,218

Strategy Effectiveness

Page 10: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Saturation or Scope

of Impac

t

Continuum of Impact

Low (awareness)

High (knowledge or behavior change)

High Reac

h

CMCAAdvocacy/Media CampaignPositive Action

Low Reac

h

Saturation PatrolsPositive Action Family Classes

Strategy Effectiveness

Page 11: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Policy Changes

57%21

%

21%

CMCA (8)

Advocacy and Education (3)

Positive Action (3)

Entries total: 14

Page 12: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Practice Changes

44%

38%

1%1%

8%

7%

CMCA (94)

Advocacy and Education (82)

Capacity (3)

Mobilization (3)

Positive Action (17)

Saturation Patrols (14)

Entries total: 213

Page 13: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Evidence-Based Strategies

Communities Mobilizing for Change on Alcohol (CMCA)

Saturation Patrols

Local Advocacy/Media Campaign

Positive Action

Page 14: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Communities Mobilizing for Change on Alcohol

SAFE STREETSUNDERAGE DRINKING

INITIATIVE

Topeka Police Department

TopekaCity Of Character

Kansas Children’s Service League

BNSF

Shawnee County Sheriff’s Office

TARC

Prevention

andRecoveryServices

Family Service & Guidance Center

Shawnee CountyDistrict Attorney’s Office

Shawnee CountyJuvenile Detention Center

CommunityVolunteers

Transition By Design

Stormont Vail

NAMI

MADD

New DawnWellness

501 School District

Jones HuyettPartners

City of Topeka Alcoholic

Beverage Control

Faith Community

Page 15: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

CMCAWhen What

2009 Underage Drinking Task Force meets monthly

2011 Lanyard project in conjunction with school districts, law enforcement and community volunteers (13,000 lanyards)

2011 Task force drafted and approved amendments to MIP/MIC and furnishing statutes

When What

2009 Amended the Social Host Law to add “recklessly”

2011 Uniform Public Offense Code standardized with state statutes

Practice Changes

Policy Changes

Page 16: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Saturation Patrols

Developed an Underage Drinking Law Enforcement Task Force (LE)

Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU) including Safe Streets, Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), Shawnee County Sheriff’s Office (SNSO) and Topeka Police Department (TPD)

The LE task force monitors and issues citations to people under 21 in possession or consuming alcohol or anyone furnishing alcohol to minors

Crime Stoppers - citizens can anonymously report underage drinking and get a reward

Page 17: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

PARTY

SNSO/TPD

Responsible adult arrives

Yes

No

Noticeto

Appear

Juvenile Intake

Intake AssessmentSubstance Questions

RecommendationsPARS, RADAC,

Mental Health, Etc.

Decision

No

Yes

Charge toDA’s Office

IIP

Follow up with case

Charges

Dismiss

Requirements fulfilled

Define Law Enforcement Protocols (TPD, SNSO, CS, Municipal Court)

Juvenile Intake Protocol

Page 18: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Alcohol Related Citations By Year

2007 2008 2009 2010 408500

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

45 4573

394

337

The Law Enforcement Task Force operations started in November 2009. The number in 2011 includes operations until November 3, 2011

Page 19: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

November 2009 through November 3, 2011

Enforcement Effectiveness Total of Citations

S. Host MIP/MIC Furnishing Miscellaneous TOTAL0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

34

392

211 167

804

Page 20: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Crime Stoppers

Tips received through October 31, 2011

223

Page 21: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Compliance Rate

Percentage of liquor/convenience stores not selling alcohol to a minor

December 2009 52%

October 2011 93%

41% increase in compliance rate

Page 22: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Saturation Patrols

When What2009 Party patrol operations start

2009 MOU between TPD, SNSO and ABC enhances party patrol operations

2011 Shoulder tap operations start

When What2010 Community has an anonymous

line to report underage drinking with Crime Stoppers

Practice Changes

Policy Changes

Page 23: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Local Advocacy/Media Campaign

173,387 people impacted

Page 24: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Media Campaign

Page 25: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant
Page 26: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant
Page 27: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant
Page 28: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Facebook InternshipSafe Streets – Jones Huyett Partners

Page 29: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Youth Interns

Trey DarrSenior

Topeka WestAlyssa Hilderman

SeniorShawnee Heights

Liam KampsenFreshman

Shawnee Heights

Page 30: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Remembering Last Night

Help your friends “Remember Last Night” by making safe decisions and having fun without alcohol

251 people like this

Safe Streets facebook page

Page 31: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Media

When What

2009Underage drinking information presented at neighborhood watch meetings, tenant meetings

2009Underage drinking information to schools, youth groups, community newsletters, parent-teachers conferences, Westridge Mall (table tents)

2009 Billboards /banners were posted at sport complexes and all over the city

2009 PSAs aired at all local TV stations

2010 Press releases to increase awareness in the community of legal consequences of underage drinking

2011 Created a youth internship

Practice Changes

Page 32: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Positive Action

Signed MOUs with school districts to implement positive action

MOUs had language agreeing to increase CTC participation rates in grades 6th, 8th, 10th and 12th

Implementing Positive Action at 16 schools and 3 agencies, including all USD #501 middle schools

Over 5,700 students have received

prevention education

Page 33: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Positive Action

When What

2010 MOU signed with PA schools to increase CTC participation rate to at least 80%

2010 All 501 schools agreed to increase CTC participation rate to at least 80%

2010 Youth attending diversion program must complete Positive Action for a successful program discharge

Practice Changes

Page 34: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Positive Action

Policy Changes

What2009 Positive Action curriculum implemented in 3

schools and 2 agencies

2010 Silver Lake School has Positive Action as a credited class

2010 Topeka Collegiate participated in the CTC survey

2010 Positive Action curriculum implemented in 10 schools and 1 agency

2011 Silver Lake seniors will take CTC survey

2011 Mater Dei will take CTC survey

2011 Positive Action implemented in 4 schools and 1 agency.

Page 35: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Sectors3%1%

12%

15%

20%21%

2%

5%

8%

3%2%

4% 4%Business and Community (11)

Healthcare Profesionals (4)

Media (46)

Parents/Families (58)

Schools (77)

Youth (81)

Neigborhood Watch (8)

Civic and Volunteer Groups (20)

Law Enforcement Agencies (31)

Other (12)

Religious and Fraternal Organiza-tions (8)

State, Local, or tribal governmental agencies (15)

Youth-serving Organizations (15)

Entries total: 386 (1/1/2009 – 11/7/2011)

Page 36: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Sectors Under-Utilized Youth

Youth interns grow our social media network Engage youth to get involved with “The Force” youth group Facilitate youth focus groups

Parents/Families Pilot family classes with schools

Faith Based Operation Net-Reach

Page 37: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Community Awareness and Support

Community and/or awareness change or shift as the result of our overall efforts

Crime Stoppers tips are coming in to report underage drinking parties Youth are now reporting that they feel they will get caught if they drink Increase in schools using Positive Action curriculum Community feedback and credibility Partners are more comfortable sharing strengths and weaknesses Increased collaboration

Page 38: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Community Awareness and Support Key leader support in Shawnee County

We are fortunate to have key leader support in all 12 community sectors.

Page 39: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Important Factors What factors are contributing to outcome data

moving? Support and buy-in from law enforcement agencies Support from local schools/school districts and community

agencies who are implementing Positive Action curriculum An extensive media/education campaign

What factors are impeding progress? A complicated judicial process Budget cuts to key partner agencies Major policy and practice changes take time

Page 40: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Next Steps

Next steps to address challenges: Policy change: Exploring a potential change to the MIP

and furnishing statute to increase fines for prevention funding.

Think tanks to discuss ways to deal with inconsistencies in the judicial system

Develop a training on handling underage drinking parties for law enforcement

Sustainability planning

Page 41: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Key Successes

Reduction in the 30-day use Reduction in binge drinking Increase in CTC participation rates Achieved a higher level of rapport/partnerships with law

enforcement agencies and community partners The number of schools that have implemented Positive

Action curriculum and the number of students impacted

Page 42: Strategic Prevention Framework –  State Incentive Grant

Lessons Learned

The SPF works The right partners are essential to changing community

and/or school norms Marketing expertise and media coverage are important Patience and flexibility Focus on evidence-based programs and community-

level outcomes Multiple strategies/multiple sectors