strategy evaluation and selection

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    1/20

    1

    BUSINESS STRATEGY

    51110 / MKT3002

    LECTURE Ten

    Strategy Implementation

    Organisational structure and

    design

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    2/20

    2

    Module 10

    Organisational structure and design

    Learning outcomes- at the conclusion of

    this module, students should be able to:Describe the main types of organisational structures

    Compare the various multi-national organisational

    structures

    Define devolution

    Describe strategic planning, financial control &

    strategic control

    Define organisational configuration; building blocksand co-ordinating mechanisms

    Undertake a stakeholder mapping exercise and

    Describe Mintzbergs six organisational configurations

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    3/20

    3

    Key words and concepts

    Simple structure

    Functional structure

    Multi-national structure

    Holding company

    Matrix structure

    Virtual organisation

    Related diversification

    Vertical integration

    Transnational corporation

    Devolution

    Strategic planning style

    Financial control

    Strategic control

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    4/20

    4

    Introduction

    This module looks at basic organisationalstructural forms and how management

    authority is exercised within theorganisation; it asks the following:Have major changes occurred in the firmsinternal strategic position?

    Have major changes occurred in the firms

    external strategic position?

    Has the firm progressed satisfactorily towardachieving its stated objectives?

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    5/20

    5

    Structural types

    The simple structure; The functional structure;

    The multi-divisional structure; The holding company structure; The matrix structure;

    Intermediate structures & structural variations; Network & virtual organisations; and Structural types in multi-national companies.

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    6/20

    6

    Thei l

    etr t r

    e

    The simple structure: is one inwhich the organisation is run by thepersonal control of an individual.

    (Johnson & Scholes 1999, p. 402)

    Management problems arise when suchbusinesses grow.

    Brothers Neilson, Uncle Tonys Kebabs etc could notkeep this structure in their quest for growth

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    7/20

    7

    The functional structurebased on the primary activities that have to becarried out, such as production, finance andaccounting, marketing and personnel.

    (Johnson & Scholes 1999, p. 403)

    Organisations are organised around specific functions Departments and teams are designed each with its

    own leadership structure

    Results in specific task orientation rather than thegreater good of the whole organisation

    Can result in many sub-cultures, goals, norms etc

    Departmental feuds can result with horror storiesabout other departments. Blaming can often result.

    Develops specialist skills and efficiencies but lacks

    integration which may be needed for strategic growth

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    8/20

    8

    The multi-divisional

    structurethe subdivision of the firm into into (operating)units (divisions) on the basis of products,services, geographical areas or processes of the

    enterprise.(Johnson & Scholes 1999, p. 404)

    Used to manage diversified companies

    Good ownership of strategic direction andoutcomes for SBU

    Corporate control is loose and mainly revolvesaround corporate planning and budgeting

    Can be fairly decentralised and autonomous

    May result in competition between divisions and

    some cannibalisation

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    9/20

    9

    The holding company

    structureis an investment company consisting of shareholdingsin a variety of separate business operations, over which

    the corporate centre exercises simple control.(Johnson & Scholes 1999, p. 408)

    Very diversified corporation

    The SBU structural form groups similar divisions orstructures into strategic business units and delegatesauthority and responsibility for each unit to to a senior

    exec. who reports the CEO.Very distinct SBU structure normally with individualbrands and names and allowed to run itself

    Corporate parent has whole or part shareholdings in

    many sperate firms

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    10/20

    10

    The holding company

    structure (Cont)

    AdvantagesSuitable for complex

    and growing businessenvironments

    Reduces gap betweenupper & lowermanagement levels

    Improves inter-firm

    communicationStrategyimplementation can befacilitated moreeffectively

    Disadvantages

    Requires an additional

    layer of management(high salary costs)

    May reduce x-

    fertilisation of ideas

    within the corporation

    Can dissipate corecompetencies thereby

    reducing capacity to

    develop new products

    and technologies

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    11/20

    11

    The matrix structure

    combination of structures which often takes theform of product and geographical divisions orfunctional and divisional structures operating intandem. (Johnson & Scholes 1999, p. 409)

    Complex dependent upon both vertical & horizontal

    flows of authority & communication.Integrates activities, planning and allocation ofresources to overcome issues of functions and divisions

    Used in small or large firms with multiple products,markets and functions

    Dual (or more) management resulting in 2 bosssyndrome and conflicting orders.

    Queensland Retail manager reports to Australia retail director,

    Australia category manager and Australian MD

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    12/20

    12

    The matrix structure

    (Cont)

    Advantages

    Can integrate diverse

    resources to addressan immediate problem

    Project objectives can

    be clearly defined

    Often suitable for

    defence, research &health industries

    DisadvantagesVery complex

    Lacks clearaccountability

    More suited to adevelopmental role

    Can result in highoverhead costs

    Needs effectivecommunicationchannels to avoidmistrust betweenspecialist areas

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    13/20

    13

    Other structuresIn reality very few firms follow the rigid models asdescribed but adapt & modify such models to meetspecific needs & contextual situations.

    Firms need to develop structure based on;Degree of control sought over product management,strategic planning, organisational functions

    Degree of diversity in geography (markets served)functions and product categories (SBUs)

    Need for growth and response to environmental changeNeed for accountability and measurement of KPIs

    Desire to motivate, train and develop employees along acareer path

    In view of this there are 3 major elements to

    consider when designing the structure

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    14/20

    14

    The elements of

    organisational design

    Three elements:

    Centralisation vs. devolution (structure on theresponsibility for operational and strategicdecision making)

    Organisational configurations (matching thestructure with the context that the

    organisation is operating)Resource allocation & control processes(influence on the behaviour of people andassist strategic development)

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    15/20

    15

    Centralisation vs.

    devolutionDevolution is: the extent to which the

    centre of the organisation delegates

    decision making to units & managerslower down the hierarchy.(Johnson & Scholes 1999, p. 423)

    Issues that managers trying to avoid:

    out of touch in the markets and operations

    of the business.

    Overcentralisation (too concerned with internal

    matters).

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    16/20

    16

    Centralisation vs.

    devolution (Cont)

    The role of the centreImprove efficiency.

    Providing expertise andservices

    Providing investment.

    Fostering innovation.

    Mitigating risk.

    Providing strong externalimage.

    Encouragingcollaboration and co-ordination.

    Setting standard.

    Dividing responsibilities Strategic planning.

    Financial control. Strategic control.

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    17/20

    17

    Organisational configurations

    The configuration of an organisation is thedetailed design consisting of a number ofbuilding blocks and co-ordinating mechanisms.

    (Johnson & Scholes 1999, p. 431)

    Mintzberg (1979) six building blocks oforganisations:

    The operating core

    The strategic apex

    The middle line

    The techno-structure

    Support staff

    Ideology

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    18/20

    18

    Lecture 10 review

    Types of organisational structureThe elements of organisational design

    Centralisation vs. devolution

    Organisational configurations

    Now go back and ask yourself the introductoryquestions

    Now ask which organisational structure willMOST benefit the firm, in terms of being able to

    achieve the strategic outcomes recommended inyour report?

    Is a change required? If YES then is this changerealistic? If NO then are the recommendationsimplementable? If NO then.

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    19/20

    19

    Next lecture

    Module 11: Resource

    allocation and control

    (Study book: Module 11 - Text Chapter

    10)

  • 8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection

    20/20

    20

    Next tutorial

    Assignment 1. (preparation)