Upload
kevin-aycardo
View
231
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
1/20
1
BUSINESS STRATEGY
51110 / MKT3002
LECTURE Ten
Strategy Implementation
Organisational structure and
design
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
2/20
2
Module 10
Organisational structure and design
Learning outcomes- at the conclusion of
this module, students should be able to:Describe the main types of organisational structures
Compare the various multi-national organisational
structures
Define devolution
Describe strategic planning, financial control &
strategic control
Define organisational configuration; building blocksand co-ordinating mechanisms
Undertake a stakeholder mapping exercise and
Describe Mintzbergs six organisational configurations
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
3/20
3
Key words and concepts
Simple structure
Functional structure
Multi-national structure
Holding company
Matrix structure
Virtual organisation
Related diversification
Vertical integration
Transnational corporation
Devolution
Strategic planning style
Financial control
Strategic control
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
4/20
4
Introduction
This module looks at basic organisationalstructural forms and how management
authority is exercised within theorganisation; it asks the following:Have major changes occurred in the firmsinternal strategic position?
Have major changes occurred in the firms
external strategic position?
Has the firm progressed satisfactorily towardachieving its stated objectives?
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
5/20
5
Structural types
The simple structure; The functional structure;
The multi-divisional structure; The holding company structure; The matrix structure;
Intermediate structures & structural variations; Network & virtual organisations; and Structural types in multi-national companies.
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
6/20
6
Thei l
etr t r
e
The simple structure: is one inwhich the organisation is run by thepersonal control of an individual.
(Johnson & Scholes 1999, p. 402)
Management problems arise when suchbusinesses grow.
Brothers Neilson, Uncle Tonys Kebabs etc could notkeep this structure in their quest for growth
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
7/20
7
The functional structurebased on the primary activities that have to becarried out, such as production, finance andaccounting, marketing and personnel.
(Johnson & Scholes 1999, p. 403)
Organisations are organised around specific functions Departments and teams are designed each with its
own leadership structure
Results in specific task orientation rather than thegreater good of the whole organisation
Can result in many sub-cultures, goals, norms etc
Departmental feuds can result with horror storiesabout other departments. Blaming can often result.
Develops specialist skills and efficiencies but lacks
integration which may be needed for strategic growth
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
8/20
8
The multi-divisional
structurethe subdivision of the firm into into (operating)units (divisions) on the basis of products,services, geographical areas or processes of the
enterprise.(Johnson & Scholes 1999, p. 404)
Used to manage diversified companies
Good ownership of strategic direction andoutcomes for SBU
Corporate control is loose and mainly revolvesaround corporate planning and budgeting
Can be fairly decentralised and autonomous
May result in competition between divisions and
some cannibalisation
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
9/20
9
The holding company
structureis an investment company consisting of shareholdingsin a variety of separate business operations, over which
the corporate centre exercises simple control.(Johnson & Scholes 1999, p. 408)
Very diversified corporation
The SBU structural form groups similar divisions orstructures into strategic business units and delegatesauthority and responsibility for each unit to to a senior
exec. who reports the CEO.Very distinct SBU structure normally with individualbrands and names and allowed to run itself
Corporate parent has whole or part shareholdings in
many sperate firms
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
10/20
10
The holding company
structure (Cont)
AdvantagesSuitable for complex
and growing businessenvironments
Reduces gap betweenupper & lowermanagement levels
Improves inter-firm
communicationStrategyimplementation can befacilitated moreeffectively
Disadvantages
Requires an additional
layer of management(high salary costs)
May reduce x-
fertilisation of ideas
within the corporation
Can dissipate corecompetencies thereby
reducing capacity to
develop new products
and technologies
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
11/20
11
The matrix structure
combination of structures which often takes theform of product and geographical divisions orfunctional and divisional structures operating intandem. (Johnson & Scholes 1999, p. 409)
Complex dependent upon both vertical & horizontal
flows of authority & communication.Integrates activities, planning and allocation ofresources to overcome issues of functions and divisions
Used in small or large firms with multiple products,markets and functions
Dual (or more) management resulting in 2 bosssyndrome and conflicting orders.
Queensland Retail manager reports to Australia retail director,
Australia category manager and Australian MD
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
12/20
12
The matrix structure
(Cont)
Advantages
Can integrate diverse
resources to addressan immediate problem
Project objectives can
be clearly defined
Often suitable for
defence, research &health industries
DisadvantagesVery complex
Lacks clearaccountability
More suited to adevelopmental role
Can result in highoverhead costs
Needs effectivecommunicationchannels to avoidmistrust betweenspecialist areas
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
13/20
13
Other structuresIn reality very few firms follow the rigid models asdescribed but adapt & modify such models to meetspecific needs & contextual situations.
Firms need to develop structure based on;Degree of control sought over product management,strategic planning, organisational functions
Degree of diversity in geography (markets served)functions and product categories (SBUs)
Need for growth and response to environmental changeNeed for accountability and measurement of KPIs
Desire to motivate, train and develop employees along acareer path
In view of this there are 3 major elements to
consider when designing the structure
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
14/20
14
The elements of
organisational design
Three elements:
Centralisation vs. devolution (structure on theresponsibility for operational and strategicdecision making)
Organisational configurations (matching thestructure with the context that the
organisation is operating)Resource allocation & control processes(influence on the behaviour of people andassist strategic development)
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
15/20
15
Centralisation vs.
devolutionDevolution is: the extent to which the
centre of the organisation delegates
decision making to units & managerslower down the hierarchy.(Johnson & Scholes 1999, p. 423)
Issues that managers trying to avoid:
out of touch in the markets and operations
of the business.
Overcentralisation (too concerned with internal
matters).
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
16/20
16
Centralisation vs.
devolution (Cont)
The role of the centreImprove efficiency.
Providing expertise andservices
Providing investment.
Fostering innovation.
Mitigating risk.
Providing strong externalimage.
Encouragingcollaboration and co-ordination.
Setting standard.
Dividing responsibilities Strategic planning.
Financial control. Strategic control.
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
17/20
17
Organisational configurations
The configuration of an organisation is thedetailed design consisting of a number ofbuilding blocks and co-ordinating mechanisms.
(Johnson & Scholes 1999, p. 431)
Mintzberg (1979) six building blocks oforganisations:
The operating core
The strategic apex
The middle line
The techno-structure
Support staff
Ideology
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
18/20
18
Lecture 10 review
Types of organisational structureThe elements of organisational design
Centralisation vs. devolution
Organisational configurations
Now go back and ask yourself the introductoryquestions
Now ask which organisational structure willMOST benefit the firm, in terms of being able to
achieve the strategic outcomes recommended inyour report?
Is a change required? If YES then is this changerealistic? If NO then are the recommendationsimplementable? If NO then.
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
19/20
19
Next lecture
Module 11: Resource
allocation and control
(Study book: Module 11 - Text Chapter
10)
8/7/2019 strategy evaluation and selection
20/20
20
Next tutorial
Assignment 1. (preparation)