17
Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure May 18, 2005 Shay K. Burrows, P.E. Senior Structural Engineer

Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

  • Upload
    bran

  • View
    54

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

May 18, 2005. Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure. Shay K. Burrows, P.E. Senior Structural Engineer. July 13, 2014. Outline. Identify threats to bridges and tunnels Describe the effective defense strategy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

May 18, 2005

Shay K. Burrows, P.E. Senior Structural Engineer

Page 2: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

OutlineIdentify threats to bridges and tunnelsDescribe the effective defense strategyHow land use plays a major part in supporting the defense

April 25, 2023

Page 3: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Are Bridges and Tunnels Really Targets?Bridges and tunnels are attractive terrorist targets due to:Economic importance to traffic and commerceSymbolism (I.e. Golden Gate Bridge, Lincoln Tunnel, etc.)Cost and time for replacementPublic impact from an attackRelatively high vulnerability, both susceptibly and structurally

Source: Transportation Security Administration

Page 4: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Are Bridges and Tunnels Really Targets?Encyclopedia of Afghan Resistance

“When you destroy large bridges by explosives, loading the middle part will destroy the netted area (the roadway), the explosives should be

combined with others placed at the two pressure points. This will destroy the bridge.”

Pressure point #2

Pressure point #1

Pressure point #3

Page 5: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Terrorist TacticsPossible Course of Action – Decision Criteria

High probability of successImpact – maximize damage and casualtiesRealistic Logistics – easily obtained materialsSpeed – minimize placement and priming timeSecrecy and surpriseSimplicity and easy coordinationFlexibility

Page 6: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Terrorists Threats to BridgesMechanical cutting devicesChemicals (acids, corrosives, etc.)ThermiteTorchesArea denial

Chemical/ biologicalSmall bombs, or just the threat of one

Page 7: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Terrorist Threats to Bridges

Explosion!Bombs constitute a high percentage of terrorist attacks worldwide

Page 8: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Explosive EffectivenessDepends on:

TypeAmount (the more the better!)Location

Internally placedExternal contactStandoff

Decreasing effectiveness

Decreasing time on target

Page 9: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Explosive Location

Source: FM5-250 and ConWep

5'

2.5'

Center of mass:x lb

Contact, elevated, un-tamped: 34x lb

6'

Standoff of 6':267x lb

Required C-4 Charge Size for

Breaching of Concrete

Page 10: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Vehicle BombsHistorically, the terrorist weapon of choice

Can use more explosivesDoesn’t require any time on target

Page 11: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Mitigation – In GeneralThe goal is to implement measures which are appropriate and effective for a particular risk, yet economical and do not interfere with a bridge’s operation

Page 12: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Construct an Effective DefenseResponse and Recovery

Prepare to deal with multiple, cascading eventsDeterrence

Make them know you are watchingDenial

Physically limit accessDetection

Use security, sensors, surveillanceDefense

Apply permanent standoff, structural hardening

Page 13: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Defense PriorityFirst Priority

Develop an accelerated response and recovery planSecond Priority

Deter, deny, detectThird Priority

Defend with standoffFourth Priority

Defend with structural toughening

How effective land use can help:

- Denying access

- Providing standoff

Page 14: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Deny Access – Fencing and Area ControlFencing or bollards to deny vehicle access or parking

Page 15: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Provide Standoff on LandPermanent barriers may provide sufficient standoff, including bollardsTemporary barriers can be used to close roads/lanes or provide standoff around critical elements during a heightened alert or specific threatAny barrier is better than none, since standoff is more important

Page 16: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

What We’re Trying to Prevent

Page 17: Structural Vulnerability, Risk Assessment and Land Use Issues for Transportation Infrastructure

Contact Information

Shay K. Burrows, P.E. FHWA- Resource Center

10. S. Howard StreetSuite 4000Baltimore, MD 21201

(410) 962-6791 [email protected]