Structure of the NSF HEP Budget - Office of Scientific and ... · HEPAP ‒ February 14-15, 2008 ‒ J. Reidy 9 EPP + PNA Portfolio • University Program – EPP Accelerator based

Structure of the NSF HEP Budg et

M. Goldberg, M. Pripstein, J. Reidy (EPP)J. Kotcher (DUSEL),

J. Whitmore, Ani Aprahamian (PNA)Fred Cooper (Theory)

Presentation for HEPAP February 15, 2008

HEPAP ‒ February 1 4 -1 5 , 2 0 0 8 ‒ J. Reidy 2

SIGN OF THE TIMES


Top ics

• Issues• PHY Program Scope• EPP/PNA/Theory Program Scope• EPP/PNA Demographics• Budget and Funding Information• Planning• Issues


ISSUES• There is evidence that the field has not

yet produced a viable plan for the futurethat is supportable, when compared toother sciences.

• We ask the community to develop a plancentered on a transformative, frontier,scientific program, including a process tocraft the resources necessary to carry itout. Meanwhile, other “must do” mid-scaleprogrammatic elements should complementthis plan.


NSF PHY Strateg y

• Short term – Complete programs at FNAL, BaBar,CESR; begin LHC exploration of TeV scale; completeplans for neutrino, astrophysics/cosmology, rareprocesses program; R&D for DUSEL and all promisingenergy-frontier accelerator concepts (e.g., CESR-TA);strengthen university program & theory

• Intermediate term – Exploit discovery potential ofLHC; utilize potential of DUSEL; support neutrino,astrophysics/cosmology, rare process approaches tomajor discoveries; prioritize/select best-valuelepton & hadron accelerator concepts; strengthenuniversity experiment program & theory

• Long term – Prepare to participate in the next energy-frontier collider, from the platform of a broaddiscovery program.


Physics Division Budg et Sectors

2008

Plan

56.9%

32.4%

10.7%


Physics Division Fund ing - $M

2.15

--

8.50

18.00

20.50

28.50

77.65

220.05

297.70

FY09Request

169.31164.62156.36142.95146.00157.70Base Prgm

1.500.25--------IceCube

----0.992.656.00--RSVP

13.7114.7114.6216.6218.0019.49CornellFacility

18.0018.0013.3710.517.003.08LHC

18.5018.5017.3417.5015.6515.65NSCL

29.5033.0031.6832.0031.0029.00LIGO

81.2184.4678.0079.2877.6567.22Facilities

250.52$249.06$234.36$222.23$223.65$224.92Physics

FY08 Plan

FY07Actual

FY06Actual

FY05Actual

FY04Actual

FY03Actual


Some EPP/PNA/THY Developments

• DUSEL Site Selection (Homestake) done - $15M/3yr toUC-Berkeley coop agreement (see T. Chan’s talk)

• DUSEL R&D is underway (with DOE)• Solicitation for proposals for initial suite of DUSEL

experiments anticipated in Spring 08 - $15M/3yr total(see T. Chan’s talk)

• The Cornell Facility is planned to close in FY09• The R&D CESR-TA (ILC Damping Ring) Project, funded

by NSF/DOE, is planned through FY10• Planned funding goals for LHC operations have been

reached• LHC Reverse Site Visits established to aid in effective

NSF funding for university groups• FY08: EPP down 5%; Theory down 4%; PNA down 2%


EPP + PNA Portfo lio• University Program

– EPP Accelerator based physics• Hadron Colliders: CDF, DØ, CMS, ATLAS, LHCb• Electron Positron Colliders: CLEO-c, BaBar,…• Neutrinos: MINOS, NOvA, MINERvA, MiniBooNE

– Particle and Nuclear Astrophysics• Dark Matter: CDMS, COUPP, XENON10, DRIFT-II, ZEPLIN-II, WARP• UltraHigh Energy Universe: HiRes/TA, Pierre Auger, VERITAS, MILAGRO• Neutrinos: Double Chooz, Super-K, Borexino, CUORE

– Theory (EPP, Astrophysics and Cosmology)– Computational physics (OSG, Tier2 Centers, DISUN)

• LHC Experiments: Maintenance and Operations• DUSEL• CESR/CLEO-c (ending 2/29/08)• Accelerator R&D

– CESR-TA (with DOE/OHEP)– MICE– Advanced Technologies

• Detector R&D– SLHC, ILC, generic– DUSEL (with DOE/OHEP,NP)

• Partnerships & Broader Impacts

HEPAP ‒ February 1 4 -1 5 , 2 0 0 8 ‒ J. Reidy 1 0

Scope of Theory Prog ram

• 1 3 University Groups

• 6 6 Ind ividual PI proposals

• This include 9 PI’s at Underg raduateInst itut ions and 6 Career Proposals+ 3this year!

• Two Centers for Collaborat ive Research-Aspen Center and KITP at UCSB--

• Possib le LHC Center--PFC competit ion

• TASI Boulder Summer School (w ith DOE)


Fund ing Prof ile - Theory

0

2000000

4000000

60000008000000

10000000

12000000

14000000

16000000

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

ITP

University


Crit ical Issues ‒ Theory Prog ram

• Need to involve m ore young peop lein LHC related physics

• Need new hires in Phenomenolog y

• Trad it ional fund ing source for theorystudents ( being TA’s) is becom ingprob lem atic. ( need m ore fund ing forstudents) .


EPP/PNA Underly ing Themes

• Empowering University-BasedInvestigators

• Adding Value– Partnerships

• Building Interdisciplinary Collaboration– Broadening Participation

• Single Investigators• Non-traditional/Underrepresented participants• Research at Undergraduate Institutions

– Education, Outreach and Broader Impacts


Partnerships

• Cyberscience– Tier 2c – with OCI– UltraLight – with OCI– OSG – with OCI and DOE

• Education with research– QuarkNet – with OMA, EHR and DOE/HEP– CHEPREO – with OMA, OCI, EHR, OISE– I2U2 – with OMA, EHR, PHY– Mariachi – OCI funded– CyberBridges – OCI funded– PIRE (UK,KSU,UNL,UIC, UPRM) – with OISE– ILC Outreach – with OISE


EPP Demog raphic

$16 2 .1 K$ 1 8 7 .2 K$ 1 7 8 .9 K$ 1 8 9 .4 KGrant Fund ing /Sr Personnel

$ 1 9 .2 9M$ 2 0 .0 3M$ 1 7 .3 5M$ 1 9 .1 3MResearch fund ing

5781 67 . Other Personnel

1 0781 06 . Secretat ial - Clerical

2 62 32 62 85 . Underg raduate Students

1 0 71 0 29 89 94 . Graduate Students

1 92 82 72 93 . Other Professionals

7 57 66 97 12 . Postdoctoral Associates

1 1 91 0 79 71 0 11 .Senior Personnel

2 0 0 72 0 0 62 0 0 52 0 0 4EPP (NSF/EIS system list ing )


EPP FY0 7 Fund ing Actions

• 85 Total FundingActions

• Mean of $237Kbased on 70 actions

• 2 Actions > $1M

• 13 small awardsfor conferencesand workshops.

0

5

10

15

20

250

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Funding Amount (k$)

Nu

mb

er

of

Aw

ard

s


PNA Demog raphic ‒ FY0 7

• 4 0 Universit ies

• 7 3 Principal Investig ators ( 4 3 FTE)

• 1 2 Under-represented PIs

• 7 FTE Research Scientists

• 4 0 FTE Postdocs

• 7 7 Graduate Students

• 6 3 Underg raduates

• Total Support = $ 1 3 ,3 7 9 ,9 5 3

• $ per PI = $ 1 8 2 ,0 4 0 ; $ per PI( FTE) =$ 3 0 7 ,9 3 9


EPP/PNA/Thy Fund ing Distribut ionFY0 7

IceCube Ops

0 %

D U S E L

6 %

All ied Funding

1 3 %

LHC Ops

1 8 %

C E S R

1 5 %

Accel&Det R&D

2 %

EPP Univ

1 8 %

P N A

1 6 %

T h e o r y

1 2 %

100.99Total

13.05Allied Funding

18.00LHC Ops

14.71CESR

2.16Accel & Det R&D

11.82Theory

6.00DUSEL

0.25IceCube Ops

16.08PNA

18.91 $MEPP

HEPAP ‒ February 1 4 -1 5 , 2 0 0 8 ‒ J. Reidy

Base + Allied Fund ing - $M

2.161.550.780.340.29Accel + ILC Det R&D

2.151.500.25IceCube OPS

25.91

87.40

11.40

6.96

18.00

13.71

15.78

20.06; DistributionTo Be Determined

FY08

11.33

18.00

8.5

FY09

18.0013.6510.517.003.08LHC OPS

14.7114.6216.6218.0019.49Cornell Facility

24.3849.8547.6241.7524.54IceCube

9.69LHC construction

MREFC

98.0791.0286.0184.8184.63Overall Total

13.0514.7812.5111.8112.70Total Allied

4.453.720.550.290.70PIF/OMA/ESIE/OISE

1.613.635.656.506.30OCI/CISE

5.935.775.565.024.00PFC

1.051.660.750.001.70MRI

EPP Allied Funding

85.0376.2473.5073.0071.93Total Base

11.8210.8210.059.2312.07EPP+Astro/Cosmo Thy

3.10(0.99) (2.65) (6.00) 0(RSVP)/DUSEL, R&D

16.0815.8514.6912.6811.70PNA

18.9119.0318.1919.7525.31EPP

Base

FY07FY06FY05FY04FY03


Planning FY0 9 and Beyond-1

• Continue to support university groups participating in acompelling experimental program at Fermilab.

• Strengthen University Experiment Program and Theory• Regional Infrastructure (UGPS Recommendation)• Support for small experiments (UGPS Recommendation)

• Continue a successful history of partnerships with DOE/OHEP• LHC: Detector Construction and LHC Operations• Pierre Auger, CDMS, Veritas,…• QuarkNet, OSG• CESR-TA, SRF• DUSEL R&D

• Continue a successful history of partnerships with DOE/NP• DUSEL R&D• CUORE


Planning FY0 9 and Beyond-2

• Possible Future Major Facilities• High Energy/Intensity Accelerator: DOE/HEP lead; PHY

supporting• Fermilab• ILC

• DUSEL: PHY lead; DOE/OHEP and NP supporting• Long baseline neutrino experiment• Proton decay• Double beta decay


ISSUES• There is evidence that the field has not

yet produced a viable plan for the futurethat is supportable, when compared toother sciences.

• We ask the community to develop a plancentered on a transformative, frontier,scientific program, including a process tocraft the resources necessary to carry itout. Meanwhile, other “must do” mid-scaleprogrammatic elements should complementthis plan.


Back Up Slides


NSF Future Planning

• Mid-Scale Instrumentat ion

‒ Intermediate between MRI and MREFC

‒ 5 year t im e frame

‒ Various possib ilit ies

• An experim ent

• Upg rades

• Accelerator, Detector R&D, …

• Equipment


Acronym s - I

AP Physics Advanced Placement Physics (for High School Students)

APPI Accelerator Physics and Physics Instrumentation

AST Astronomy Division

CHE Chemistry Division

CHEPREO Center for High Energy Physics Research and Education Outreach

CI-TEAM CyberInfrastructure Training Education Advancement and Mentoring

COV Committee of Visitors

CyberBridges Grid Computing and Science Disciplines Interdisciplinary Research and Education

DDDAS Dynamically Data Driven Applications Systems

DISUN Data Intensive Science University Network (CMS Tier-2c)

DMR Division of Materials Research

DMS Division of Mathematical Sciences

DUSEL Deep Underground Scientific Laboratory

EHR Education and Human Resources Directorate

EPP Elementary Particle Physics

ESIE Elementary, Secondary and Informal Education

GK12 Graduate Teaching Fellows in K12 Education

GOALI Grant Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry

I2U2 Interactions in Understanding the Universe (Research and Formal and Informal Education Program)

IPSE Internships in Public Science Education

Mariachi Mixed Apparatus for Radar Investigation of Cosmic-rays of High Ionization

MPS Mathematical and Physical Sciences Directorate

MREFC Major Reseach Equipment and Facilities Construction


Acronym s - II

NA Nuclear Astrophysics

OCI Office of CyberInfrastructure

OISE Office of International Science and Engineering

OMA Office of Multidisciplinary Activites

OSG Open Science Grid (Funded Jointly by DOE and NSF)

PA Particle Astrophysics

PFC Physics Frontier Centers

PHY Physics Division

PhysTEC Physics Teacher Education Coalition

PIF Physics at the Information Frontier

PIRE Partnerships for International Research and Education

PNA Particle and Nuclear Astrophysics

QuarkNet National Education and Outreach in Particle Physics (Funded Jointly by DOE and NSF)

R&RA Research and Related Activities

RET Research Experiences for Teachers

REU Research Experiences for Undergraduates

SBE Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate

SBIR Small Business Innovation Research

SGER Small Grant for Exploratory Research

Tier 2c Tier 2 Computing Center - DISUN (Data Intensive Science University Network)

Trillium The trio of SCIDAC (DOE), GriPhyN (NSF/OCI), and iVDGL (NSF/PHY)

UltraLight High Bandwidth Networking


Prog ram s of Interest

• MREFC: Major Research Equipm ent & Facilit iesConstruction

• MRI: Major Research Instrum entat ion• CI-TEAM: Cyberinfrastructure and Education• PIF: Physics at the Inform ation Frontier• PIRE: Partnerships for Internat ional Research and Education• SBIR: Sm all Business Innovation Research• GOALI: Grant Opportunit ies for Academ ic Liaison w ithIndustry

• GK1 2 : Graduate Teaching Fellowships in K1 2 Education• IPSE: Internships in Pub lic Science Education

• See NSF website for opportunit ies‒ www .nsf .g ov

Documents

Structure of the NSF HEP Budget - Office of Scientific and ... · HEPAP ‒ February 14-15, 2008 ‒ J. Reidy 9 EPP + PNA Portfolio • University Program – EPP Accelerator based