struture analogy2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    1/21

    Presented by:-

    Ankita Solanki

    Devendra Sharma

    Sneha Tirpude

    Swarnika Tigga

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    2/21

    Forecast by analogy met ss mes t t

    t ifferent inds f enomena s ares t e

    samemodel of ehavior. For example,one

    ay topredict the sales of anewproduct isto chooseanexistingproduct which "looks

    like" thenewproduct in terms of the

    expecteddemandpattern for sales of the

    product.

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    3/21

    It seems natural touseanalogies when

    makingdecisions or forecastingas y

    definition they contain informationabout

    howpeoplehavebehaved in similarsituations in thepast. Onebehavioral

    scientist asserted that wemayexplain

    humanbehavior byassuming that decision

    aremadebyanalogywithprevious cases .

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    4/21

    Theuseof analogy is not a recent

    phenomenon; For e.g. analogies were

    commonlyused for economic andbusiness

    forecasting in the 1930s.Most of thedecisionmadeearly in Vietnam

    war werebasedon structuredanalogies.

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    5/21

    More recently theuseof analogies has

    becomeapopular solution topredict the

    cost of softwaredevelopment project.

    In the field studyof 589 organization,61% ofthosewho reported forecasting the cost of

    S/W projects kept dataonprevious projects

    andpredicted the cost of newprojects by

    analogy.Weexpects theanalogies wouldbeuseful in

    forecastingdecision in conflict situation that

    are quiet difficult to forecast.

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    6/21

    Two ofwhichinvolves experts analyzinganalogies.

    1. The administrator describes the targetsituation, &

    2. Selects experts;

    3. The each experts identify & describe

    analogies,

    4. The expert rate similarity;

    5. The administrator derives forecasts.

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    7/21

    Theadministrator prepares anaccurate,comprehensive & brief description.

    Todo so, theadministrator should seekadviceeither fromunbiasedexperts orfromexperts withopposingbiases.

    It should includea list of possibleoutcomes for the target situation tomakeforecastingeasier.

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    8/21

    Theadministrator recruits experts whoare likely toknowabout situation that are similar to the targetsituation.

    Theadministrator shoulddecidehoware likely toknowabout situation that are similar to the target

    situation. Theadministrator shoulddecidehowmanyexperts to

    recruit basedonhowmuchknowledge theyhaveabout analogous situation, the variability in responseamongexperts, & the importanceof obtainingaccurate forecasts.

    rawingupon the researchon thedesirablenumberof forecasts to combine;one should seek thehelpofat least fiveexperts.

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    9/21

    Asks theexperts todescribeas manyanalogies asthey canwithout considering theextent of thesimilarity to the target situation.

    4. RATE SIMILARITY Asks theexperts to list similarities anddifferences

    between their analogies & the target situation, &then to rate the similarityof eachanalogy to thetarget.

    It is better providinga scaleagainst which theexperts can rate the similarityof their analogies. Askthem tomatch their analogies outcomes with targetoutcomes.

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    10/21

    Topromote logical consistencyandreplicability, theadministrator shoulddecideon the rules toderivea forecast

    fromexperts analogies. Many rules arereasonable touse.

    For example,one could select theanalogythat theexpert ratedas most similar to thetarget andadopt theoutcome impliedby

    that analogyas the forecast.

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    11/21

    TO FORECAST CONFLICTS

    OUTCOME

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    12/21

    ARTISTS PROTEST:Members of a richnations artistsunionoccupiedamajor gallery & demandedgenerousfinancial support from their government. What will bethe final resolutionof theartists sit-in? (6options)

    DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL:Anappliancemanufacturer

    proposed toa supermarket chainanovel arrangementfor retailing its wares. Will themanagement of thesupermarket chainagree to theplan? (3 options)

    55% PAY PLAN:Professional sports players demandeda55% shareof gross revenues & threatened togoonstrike if theowners didnt concede. Will therebea

    strike & if so,how longwill it last? (4 options) NURSES DISPUTE:Angrynurses increased their pay

    demand & threatenedmore strikeactions afterspecialist nurses & junior doctors receivedbigincreases. What will theoutcomeof their negotiationsbe? (3 options)

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    13/21

    PERSONAL GRIEVANCE:Anemployeedemandedameetingwithamediator whenher jobwas downgradedafter her newmanager re-evaluated it. What will theoutcomeof themeetingwith themediator be? (4 options)

    TELKO TAKEOVER: Anacceptable telecommunication

    provider,after rejectinga sellers mobilebusiness offer,madeahostilebid for thewhole corporation. Howwill the stand-offbetween the companies be resolved? (4 options)

    WATERDISPUTE: Troops fromneighboringnations moved totheir commonborder and thedownstreamnations threatenedtobomb theupstreamnations newdam. Will theupstreamneighbor agree to releaseadditional water &, if not,howwill

    thedownstreamnations government respond? (3 options) ZENITH INVESTMENT:Under political pressure,a large

    manufacturer evaluatedan investment inexpensivenewtechnology. Howmanynewmanufacturingplants will itdecide to commission? (3 options)

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    14/21

    Questionnaires asked toexpert consists of

    following questions:

    Describeeachanalogous situation

    Describe their sourceof knowledgeabout it

    List similarities anddifferences compared to

    the target conflict

    Provideanoverall similarity rating

    (whereno similarity=0.high similarity= 10)

    theoutcome closest to theoutcomeof their

    analogy

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    15/21

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    16/21

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    17/21

    The structuredanalogies method is useful only in casesinwhichexperts can thinkof analogies. The limitationscanbeovercome inmany situations by identifyingpeoplewith relevant expertise. While this maybedifficult toknow inadvance,one cangaugepeoplesexpertise from their responses- i.e. ,did theyprovideanalogies, if so,howmany; & did theyhavedirectexperience?

    Using structuredanalogies is more costlyand timeconsuming.

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    18/21

    For our structuredanalogies method, the twokey criteria for identifyinganexpert werethenumber of analogies generatedand thepresenceof direct knowledgeabout thoseanalogies.

    The forecasts from the structuredanalogy,for this case studies was found tobe 75%accurate.

    Given the importanceof forecasts inconflicts situationand inother arenas, suchimprovement couldhave considerablebenefits.

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    19/21

    Thank you!

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    20/21

  • 8/6/2019 struture analogy2

    21/21