1
Valentina Franceschi LJLL, Sorbonne Universit´ e, Universit´ e de Paris, Inria, CNRS, Paris, France Aldo Pratelli Universit` a di Pisa, Pisa, Italy Giorgio Stefani Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy Abstract – We illustrate some results about minimal bubble clusters in the plane with double density. This amounts to find the best configuration of m N regions in the plane enclosing given volumes, in order to minimize their total perimeter, where perimeter and volume are defined by suitable densities. We focus on a particular structure of such densities, which is inspired by a sub-Riemannian model, called the Grushin plane. After an overview concerning existence of minimizers, we focus on their Steiner regularity, i.e., the fact that their boundaries are made of regular curves meeting at 120 o . We will show that this holds in a wide generality. Although our initial motivation came from the study of the particular sub-Riemannian framework of the Grushin plane, our approach works in wide generality and is new even in the classical Euclidean case. The minimal partition problem In R 2 consider a volume measure V and a perimeter measure P . Given v 1 ,...,v M > 0, consider the class of M -clusters C (v 1 ,...,v M ) = ! E = {E 1 ,...,E M " #$ % pairwise disjoint } : V(E i )= v i ,i =1,...,M & , v1 v2 v3 The minimal partition problem is inf {P P (E ): E C (v 1 ,...v M )} , (1) where P P (E )= 1 2 ( M ) i=1 P (E i ) + P ( M * i=1 E i + , + , . Solutions are called M -minimal clusters. Euclidean case P = P Eucl = De Giorgi Perimeter; V = |·| = Lebesgue measure [1] : + regularity of solutions proved in R n , n 2: E minimal E smooth outside singular set Σ, H n1 (Σ) = 0. [9] : Structure of singularities in the plane: E min. E = smooth CMC curves meeting in 120 threes, (see [13] for n = 3). 120 120 120 x y (M = 1) Isoperimetric problem : for n 2 and all volumes solu- tions are balls. (M = 2) For n 2 and all volumes solutions are standard double bubbles : [2, 7, 12] .(Images from [2] ) (M = 3) For n = 2 and all volumes, solutions are standard triple bubbles : [14]. (Image from [14] ) (M = 4) n = 2, same volumes [10] (“M = ”) n = 2, Honeycomb conjecture [6]. (Image from [6] ) Minimal partition problem in the plane with double density We study the minimal partition problem (1), where perimeter and volume have l.s.c. densities h, f : R 2 (0, ): P h (E )= - E h(x) dH 1 (x), |E | f = - E f (x) dx. (M = 1): isoperimetric problem with density. [Brock, Ca˜ nete, Cianchi, De Philippis, Fusco, Maggi, Miranda, Morgan, Pratelli, Rosales, Saracco, ... ] including the case of anisotropic densities h = h(x, ν ) NB: Existence and regularity are in general not expected. GOAL: Identify a class of densities for which existence holds and study regularity properties in view of the 120 rule. The Grushin plane is a 2D sub-Riemannian manifold: α 0 Grushin plane P h (E )= P α (E ) = - E . ν 2 1 + x 2α 1 ν 2 2 " #$ % h(x,ν ) dH 1 (x), |E | f = |·| " #$ % f 1 Via a change of variables we get: Transformed Grushin plane P h (E )= P Eucl (E ) " #$ % h1 , |E | f α = - E |(α + 1)x 1 | α α+1 " #$ % f α (x) dx. no translation invariance Translation invariance NB: The Grushin perimeter P α is not translation-invariant. An important feature of the Grushin plane is that, dierently to higher dimensional sub-Riemannian examples, isoperimetric sets can be characterized, see [8]. Theorem 1 (M = 1 - characterization) Let v> 0. Up to vertical translations, ! sol. to inf {P α (E ): |E | = v } obtained via anisotropic dilations from E α = {(x, y ) R 2 : |y | ϕ α (|x|), |x| 1}, ϕ α explicit: -1.0 -0.5 0.5 1.0 -0.5 0.5 Existence In [3] we obtain the following result. Theorem 2 (F., P., S., - in the Grushin plane) M -minimal clusters exist for P α , |·|, for any M N. Remark 1 For general densities h, f : holds if Φ : P h (Φ(E )) P h (E ), |Φ(E )| f = |E | f . a b E b’ a’ a b E Φ(E) Φ Regularity and 120 rule. In [4] we obtain the following result. Theorem 3 (F., P., S., Steiner regularity) Let E be a M -minimal cluster for densities h, f . Assume that h is con- tinuous, and that for η > 0, 0 < β 1, ηβ > 1 we have: i) growth condition, i.e., |B Eucl (x, r )| f r η , r << 1; ii) ε ε β property for E () Then E satisfies the Steiner property, and if h is locally α- older then the arcs of E are actually C 1,γ for γ = γ (α, η ). () the ε ε β property: It is possible to modify the cluster E to change the global volume of ε, by changing the global perimeter at most of |ε| β : |P | |V | β , |V | small, outside a given ball. True in Euclidean and “transformed” Grushin with β =1. [11] Growth condition. Examples: Euclidean case for η =2; “trans- formed” Grushin case (h 1, f |(α + 1)x 1 | α α+1 ): η = α +2. Corollary 4 (F., P., S.) M -minimal clusters in the “trans- formed” Grushin plane (R 2 , P, |·| f α ) exist and their boundary is the finite union of C 1,γ curves meeting in threes at 120 . Double bubble in the Grushin plane Consider (1) for M = 2 in the Grushin plane (R 2 ,P α , |·|). In [5], we study symmetric double bubbles in the Grushin plane inf ! P α (E ): E = {E 1 ,E 2 } C (v 1 ,v 2 ) & where C (v 1 ,v 2 ) is replaced by assuming v 1 = v 2 = v 0 and the following specific structures of interfaces. Problem 1: (DBV) Only vertical interfaces on {x 1 =0} allowed. Problem 2: (DBH) Only horizontal interfaces allowed. Theorem 5 (F., S.,) Let v> 0, α 0. Then solutions to problems (DBV), (DBH) exist. Moreover: (DBV) E R 2 sol. to (DBV) up to vertical translations E = {x R 2 : |x 2 | f (|x 1 |), |x 1 | r }, f = f v,α C ([0,r ]) C (]0,r [), r ]0, +[. f=f(0,v) 120 120 120 x y f=f(,v) x y 120 in transformed coordinates α =0 α =1 (DBH) E R 2 sol. to (DBH) up to vertical translations E = δ 1 k /! x R 2 : / x 1 , |x 2 | ϕ α / 3 2 00 E α &0 , ϕ α : [0, 1] [0, +[ isoperimetric profile and k = k (v, α). E 120 120 120 x y E ? ? ? x y 120 in transformed coordinates α =0 α =1 Comparison between vertical and horizontal (DBV) (DBH). E V x y E H x y P 1 (E V ) > P 1 (E H ) ! Numerical simulations: (via Brakke Surface evolver http://facstaff.susqu.edu/brakke/evolver/html/) References [1] F. J. Almgren, Jr. Existence and regularity almost everywhere of solutions to elliptic variational problems with constraints. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 4(165):viii+199, 1976. [2] J. Foisy, M. Alfaro, J. Brock, N. Hodges, and J. Zimba. The standard double soap bubble in R 2 uniquely minimizes perimeter. Pacific J. Math., 159(1):47–59, 1993. [3] V. Franceschi, A. Pratelli, and G. Stefani. On the existence of planar minimizing cluster. preprint. [4] V. Franceschi, A. Pratelli, and G. Stefani. On the Steiner property for planar minimizing clusters. preprint. [5] V. Franceschi and G. Stefani. Symmetric double bubbles in the grushin plane. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., to appear. [6] T. C. Hales. The honeycomb conjecture. Discrete Comput. Geom., 25(1):1–22, 2001. [7] M. Hutchings, F. Morgan, M. Ritor´ e, and A. Ros. Proof of the double bubble conjecture. Ann. of Math. (2), 155(2):459–489, 2002. [8] R. Monti and D. Morbidelli. Isoperimetric inequality in the Grushin plane. J. Geom. Anal., 14(2):355–368, 2004. [9] F. Morgan. Soap bubbles in R 2 and in surfaces. Pacific J. Math., 165(2):347–361, 1994. [10] E. Paolini and A. Tamagnini. Minimal clusters of four planar regions with the same area. ESAIM: COCV, 24(3):1303–1331, 2018. [11] A. Pratelli and G. Saracco. The ε ε property in the isoperimetric problem with double density, and the regularity of isoperimetric sets, 2019. [12] B. W. Reichardt. Proof of the double bubble conjecture in R n . J. Geom. Anal., 18(1):172–191, 2008. [13] J. E. Taylor. The structure of singularities in area-related variational problems with constraints. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 81(6):1093–1095, 1975. [14] W. Wichiramala. Proof of the planar triple bubble conjecture. J. Reine Angew. Math., 567:1–49, 2004. Sub-Riemannian soap bubbles

Sub-Riemannian soap bubbles - sorbonne-universite.fr...[10] E. Paolini and A. Tamagnini. Minimal clusters of four planar regions with the same area. ESAIM: COCV, 24(3):1303–1331,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Valentina FranceschiLJLL, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Inria, CNRS,

    Paris, France

    Aldo PratelliUniversità di Pisa,

    Pisa, Italy

    Giorgio StefaniScuola Normale Superiore,

    Pisa, Italy

    Abstract – We illustrate some results about minimal bubble clusters in the plane with double density. This amounts to findthe best configuration of m ∈ N regions in the plane enclosing given volumes, in order to minimize their total perimeter, whereperimeter and volume are defined by suitable densities. We focus on a particular structure of such densities, which is inspired by asub-Riemannian model, called the Grushin plane.

    After an overview concerning existence of minimizers, we focus on their Steiner regularity, i.e., the fact that their boundaries aremade of regular curves meeting at 120o. We will show that this holds in a wide generality.

    Although our initial motivation came from the study of the particular sub-Riemannian framework of the Grushin plane, our approachworks in wide generality and is new even in the classical Euclidean case.

    The minimal partition problemIn R2 consider a volume measure V and a perimeter measure P .

    Given v1, . . . , vM > 0, consider the class of M-clusters

    C(v1, . . . , vM ) ={E = {E1, . . . , EM︸ ︷︷ ︸

    pairwise disjoint

    } : V(Ei) = vi, i = 1, . . . ,M},

    v1

    v2 v3

    The minimal partition problem is

    inf {PP (E) : E ∈ C(v1, . . . vM )} , (1)

    where PP (E) =1

    2

    M∑

    i=1

    P (Ei) + P

    M⋃

    i=1

    Ei

    .

    Solutions are called M-minimal clusters.

    Euclidean case

    P = PEucl = De Giorgi Perimeter;

    V = | · | = Lebesgue measure

    • [1] : ∃ + regularity of solutions proved in Rn, n ≥ 2:E minimal ⇒ ∂E smooth outside singular set Σ, Hn−1(Σ) = 0.

    • [9] : Structure of singularities in the plane:E min. ⇒ ∂E = ∪ smooth CMC curves meeting in 120◦ threes,(see [13] for n = 3).

    f=f(0,v)120120 120

    x

    y

    (M = 1) Isoperimetric problem : for n ≥ 2 and all volumes solu-tions are balls.

    (M = 2) For n ≥ 2 and all volumes solutions are standard doublebubbles : [2, 7, 12] .(Images from [2])

    (M = 3) For n = 2 and all volumes, solutions are standard triplebubbles : [14]. (Image from [14])

    (M = 4) n = 2, same volumes [10]

    (“M = ∞”) n = 2, Honeycomb conjecture [6]. (Image from [6])

    Minimal partition problem in the planewith double densityWe study the minimal partition problem (1), where perimeter andvolume have l.s.c. densities h, f : R2 → (0,∞):

    Ph(E) =

    ∂∗Eh(x) dH1(x), |E|f =

    Ef (x) dx.

    (M = 1): isoperimetric problem with density. [Brock, Cañete, Cianchi, DePhilippis, Fusco, Maggi, Miranda, Morgan, Pratelli, Rosales, Saracco, ... ]

    → including the case of anisotropic densities h = h(x, ν)

    NB: Existence and regularity are in general not expected.

    GOAL: Identify a class of densities for which existence holds andstudy regularity properties in view of the 120◦ rule.

    The Grushin plane is a 2D sub-Riemannian manifold: α ≥ 0

    Grushin plane

    Ph(E) = Pα(E) =

    ∂∗E

    √ν21 + x

    2α1 ν

    22︸ ︷︷ ︸

    h(x,ν)

    dH1(x), |E|f = | · |︸ ︷︷ ︸f≡1

    Via a change of variables we get:

    Transformed Grushin plane

    Ph(E) = PEucl(E)︸ ︷︷ ︸h≡1

    ,

    |E|fα =∫

    E|(α + 1)x1|−

    αα+1︸ ︷︷ ︸

    fα(x)

    dx. no translation invariance

    Translation invariance

    NB: The Grushin perimeter Pα is not translation-invariant.

    An important feature of the Grushin plane is that, differently tohigher dimensional sub-Riemannian examples, isoperimetric sets canbe characterized, see [8].

    Theorem 1 (M = 1 - characterization) Let v > 0. Up tovertical translations, ∃! sol. to inf{Pα(E) : |E| = v} obtained viaanisotropic dilations from Eα = {(x, y) ∈ R2 : |y| ≤ ϕα(|x|), |x| ≤1}, ϕα explicit:

    -1.0 -0.5 0.5 1.0

    -0.5

    0.5

    Existence In [3] we obtain the following result.

    Theorem 2 (F., P., S., - ∃ in the Grushin plane)M-minimal clusters exist for Pα, | · |, for any M ∈ N.

    Remark 1 For general densities h, f : ∃ holds if

    ∃Φ : Ph(Φ(E)) ≤ Ph(E), |Φ(E)|f = |E|f

    .

    a b

    E

    b’a’ a b

    EΦ(E)

    Φ

    Regularity and 120◦ rule. In [4] we obtain the following result.

    Theorem 3 (F., P., S., Steiner regularity) Let E be aM-minimal cluster for densities h, f . Assume that h is con-tinuous, and that for η > 0, 0 < β ≤ 1, ηβ > 1 we have:i) growth condition, i.e., |BEucl(x, r)|f ≲ rη, r 0, α ≥ 0.Then solutions to problems (DBV), (DBH) exist. Moreover:(DBV) E ⊂ R2 sol. to (DBV) ⇒ up to vertical translations

    E = {x ∈ R2 : |x2| ≤ f (|x1|), |x1| ≤ r},

    f = fv,α ∈ C([0, r]) ∩ C∞(]0, r[), r ∈]0,+∞[.f=f(0,v)120

    120 120

    x

    yf=f( ,v)

    x

    y

    120 in transformed coordinates

    α = 0 α = 1

    (DBH) E ⊂ R2 sol. to (DBH) ⇒ up to vertical translations

    E = δ1k

    ({x ∈ R2 :

    (x1, |x2|− ϕα

    (√32

    ))∈ Eα

    }),

    ϕα : [0, 1] → [0,+∞[ isoperimetric profile and k = k(v,α).E

    120120120

    x

    y

    E

    ???

    x

    y

    120 in transformed coordinates

    α = 0 α = 1

    Comparison between vertical and horizontal

    (DBV) (DBH).

    EV

    x

    y

    EH

    x

    y

    P1(EV ) > P1(EH) !

    Numerical simulations: (via Brakke Surface evolverhttp://facstaff.susqu.edu/brakke/evolver/html/)

    References

    [1] F. J. Almgren, Jr. Existence and regularity almost everywhere of solutions to elliptic variational

    problems with constraints. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 4(165):viii+199, 1976.

    [2] J. Foisy, M. Alfaro, J. Brock, N. Hodges, and J. Zimba. The standard double soap bubble in

    R2 uniquely minimizes perimeter. Pacific J. Math., 159(1):47–59, 1993.

    [3] V. Franceschi, A. Pratelli, and G. Stefani. On the existence of planar minimizing cluster.

    preprint.

    [4] V. Franceschi, A. Pratelli, and G. Stefani. On the Steiner property for planar minimizing

    clusters. preprint.

    [5] V. Franceschi and G. Stefani. Symmetric double bubbles in the grushin plane. ESAIM Control

    Optim. Calc. Var., to appear.

    [6] T. C. Hales. The honeycomb conjecture. Discrete Comput. Geom., 25(1):1–22, 2001.

    [7] M. Hutchings, F. Morgan, M. Ritoré, and A. Ros. Proof of the double bubble conjecture. Ann.

    of Math. (2), 155(2):459–489, 2002.

    [8] R. Monti and D. Morbidelli. Isoperimetric inequality in the Grushin plane. J. Geom. Anal.,

    14(2):355–368, 2004.

    [9] F. Morgan. Soap bubbles in R2 and in surfaces. Pacific J. Math., 165(2):347–361, 1994.

    [10] E. Paolini and A. Tamagnini. Minimal clusters of four planar regions with the same area.

    ESAIM: COCV, 24(3):1303–1331, 2018.

    [11] A. Pratelli and G. Saracco. The ε−ε property in the isoperimetric problem with double density,and the regularity of isoperimetric sets, 2019.

    [12] B. W. Reichardt. Proof of the double bubble conjecture inRn. J. Geom. Anal., 18(1):172–191,

    2008.

    [13] J. E. Taylor. The structure of singularities in area-related variational problems with constraints.

    Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 81(6):1093–1095, 1975.

    [14] W. Wichiramala. Proof of the planar triple bubble conjecture. J. Reine Angew. Math.,

    567:1–49, 2004.

    Sub-Riemannian soap bubbles