Upload
trinhdien
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
(Submitted for Public Consultation as per EIA Notification)
IN FAVOUR OF:
RAM PRAKASH
PROP. M/S MAHESH STONE CRUSHER MAUJA ANDORA NICHLA, TEHSIL-AMB DISTRICT UNA, HIMACHAL PRADESH.
FOR RIVER BED MINING OF MINOR MINERALS: SAND, STONE AND BAJRI, KHASRA No. 2074/2228 TOTAL 7-02-13 Ha
Submitted By:
SHIVALIK SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT LTD. (UPL ENVIRO INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP CO),
VILLAGE MAJARA P. O. DABHOTA, TEHSIL NALAGARH DIST. SOLAN,
HIMACHAL PRADESH.
2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The Environmental Impact Assessment Report of Mining Lease for collection of Sand, Stone and Bajri situated in Khasra No. 2074/2228 Measuring 7-02-13 Ha for maximum production of 74,000 TPA from the bed of Soan ( Swan) River in Village Andola Nichla, Tehsil Amb, District Una, Himachal Pradesh has been prepared in accordance with the Terms of Reference approved by Expert Appraisal Committee on Mining Projects in its 16th Meeting held on 21-23 June, 2011. The project has been considered as Category-A project because of interstate boundary with Punjab at a distance of 6.5 Km thus sent to EAC, MoEF, and Government of India for clearance. The report follows the Generic structure of Environment Impact Assessment Document, given in Appendix III/IIIA of EIA Notification, 2006.
IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT & PROJECT PROPONENT PROJECT Mining Lease for Sand, Bajri and Boulders situated in Khasra 2074/2228 Measuring 7-02-13 Ha for maximum production of 74,000 TPA from the bed of Soan River in Village Andora Nichla, Tehsil Amb, District Una, Himachal Pradesh. PROJECT PROPONENT The project proponent is Ram Prakash prop. M/s Mahesh Stone Crusher. The contact person for the purpose is- RAM PRAKASH, VILLAGE & P.O. – KALRUHI, TEHSIL-AMB DISTRICT UNA, HIMACHAL PRADESH.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, SIZE, LOCATION OF THE PROJECT AND ITS IMPORTANCE TO THE COUNTRY, REGION The proposed mine is located at at Longitude: 76° 05’ 31.8”E and 76° 05’ 38.5”E /Latitude: 30° 39’ 10”N and 31° 39’ 10.6”N Maps attached in the main report Drawing-1: Topo Sheet showing location of Mine site. Drawing:2. Google View Drawing-3; Location Map Drawing-4; Contour and Geological Map SIZE: The project fall under category A project at Sr.No. 1(a) (i) <50 ha ≥ 5 ha .of mining lease area because of interstate boundary with Punjab at a distance of about 6.5Km. The proposed mining area is 7-02-13 ha for maximum mining of 74,000 TPA Total yearly projected production is: (1) I st Year 63000 MT (2) II nd year- 63000 MT (3) III rd year- 63000 MT (4) IVth year- 63000 MT (5) Vth year- 63000 MT The method of mining shall be manual, No blasting shall be done.
3
IMPORTANCE OF THE PROJECT: The urban sector in India presents an attractive investment proposition. Increased disposable incomes, easy availability of loans and a general reduction in applicable interest rates coupled with encouragement to genuine buyers by the central government in the form of income tax benefits are some of the factors that have fuelled demand for quality urban infrastructure developments. Achieving such a huge infrastructure requires basic building materials and stone, sand and bajri is one of primary building material required for the purpose. The mining projects as such are the backbone of all construction and infrastructure projects as the raw material for construction is available only from such mining.
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MAGNITUDE OF OPERATION The project as submitted in Chapter-II is Proposed. It is a mine of only 7-02-13 Ha for maximum mining of 74,000 TPA Total material handling including waste material shall be: (1) I st Year 74000 MT (2) II nd year- 74000 MT (3) III rd year- 74000 MT (4) IVth year- 74000 MT (5) Vth year- 74000 MT No Blasting shall be done. Achieving a huge infrastructure as being envisaged by Government of India particularly in road and housing sector requires basic building materials. The stone,sand and bajri is one of primary building material required for the purpose. The mining activities as proposed are the backbone of all construction and infrastructure projects as the raw material for construction is available only from such mining. There is no National Park, Sanctuary, Elephant/Tiger Reserve, eco-sensitive area, migratory routes within 10 km of the project site. The joint inspection report by the team of Himachal Pradesh Government has also clarified that there is no Forest Land involved. It has also clarified that there is no activity of the forest department in the area as soil conservation works, nursery plantation, nor there is any property of the Forest Department nearby which may have direct effect if mining is allowed. The project is, however, at about an aerial distance 6.5 kms from the interstate boundary of Punjab and thus sent to EAC, MoEF, and Government of India for clearance
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR APPROVAL & IMPLEMENTATION The proponent has been granted mining lease for mining sand, stone and bajri vide letter Nos. Udyog – Bhu (Khani - 4) Laghu – 202/08 – 15896 dated 27- 06- 2010 for a period of five years. Following approvals are in place and documents are attached in main report: A-I: Approval Letter from Department of Industries, Government of H.P-Grant of mining Lease
4
A-II: Joint Inspection report from SDM, Forest Department, Pollution Control Board, PWD and
IPH Department. A-III: NOC from Village Panchayat. A-IV: Approval of Mining Plan
TECHNOLOGY & PROCESS DESCRIPTION As per Environmental Impact Assessment Guidance Manual for -MINING OF MINERALS released by MoEF- the project is a surface mining. The project does not involve any processes as overburden removal, drilling, blasting and processing. The mining will involve collection of material by simple hand tool, sorting, manual picking, stacking and loading into trucks/tractor –trolley for transporting. The pits from where the material is picked are not deeper than one meter as allowed in mining lease and shall follow the normal channel direction of the khad. These get replenished during monsoon. No blasting is done. The only waste is silt/clay which is added back to the pits.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Process Flow diagram is given below:
Surface Mining
Site Preparation (Marking Boundary Pillars/Identification Stones)
Manual Excavation loading
Haulage
Further Processing
There is no source of air pollution like Flue Gas emissions from boilers, furnace etc. The water required is only for drinking purpose and toilet needs of @ 10-12 workers for which toilet with septic tank is to be provided at Stone Crusher site. The water is further required for sprinkling on haulage road which is done twice a day in morning and evening with a tanker. The crusher is at a distance of @ 8 km from the mining area. . Water shall be sprinkled as per requirements by using a tanker. Daily @ 4 tractor-trolley move to and fro from the mining site to the crusher and make about 5 turns each only.
WASTE MATERIAL A total of 55000 metric tonne of waste shall be generated in five years that is silt and clay which do not have market value as below:
5
Year Silt Clay
Total
First Year 7400 3600 11000 Second Year 7400 3600 11000 Third Year 7400 3600 11000 Fourth Year 7400 3600 11000 Fifth Year 7400 3600 11000 Total 37000 18000 55000
The material is spread back over the river bed.
SUMMARISED INFORMATION ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT The proposed project falls under Item 1 (a) (Mining of Minerals) as per Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2006. The project will fall under Category A because of applicability of General Condition and will require environmental clearance from the Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF). An EIA/EMP study report has been prepared for this project for the period of October to December 2011. Identification & prediction of significant environmental impacts due to the proposed Mining activity with an Environmental Impact Statement followed by delineation of appropriate impact mitigation measures in an Environmental Management Plan are included in the EIA Report. The purpose of this Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study is to provide information on the nature and extent of environmental impacts arising from the construction and operation of the proposed project. The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for proposed sand and stone mining activities of area deals with detailed studies for various environmental components viz., air, water, land, noise, biological and socio-economic environment which represent the existing environmental scenario. For the environmental impact studies, an area covering 10 km distance from the boundary of mining lease areas was identified as study area (impact zone). The environmental attributes, parameters, stations, height (RL), distance and direction with respect to the core zone were studied. The report incorporates the data collection during the period of October to December 2011. Secondary data was collected from various government departments, boards, public sector, educational and scientific institutions. The collected meteorological data during this season represented the local weather
phenomena. The predominant wind direction of the study area is NW The monitored ambient air quality in the core & buffer study area was found to be in
compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) Ambient equivalent noise levels (Leq) during day and night times were found to be well
within the CPCB Norms of Industrial & Commercial area limits.
The water quality of surface water and ground water was found to be in compliance with BIS/CPCB Norms
6
The soil in the study area would very well support vegetation after amending it suitable with manure the yield will increase.
The native species of plants and animals will be protected by mitigating the affecting
factors.
The proposed lease area is located on Soan river bed .The Soan river flows towards the south east side before it confluences with River Satluj
BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
Attribute Baseline status Ambient Air Quality
Ambient air quality was monitored at 4 locations within a 10 km distance from the project site. The observed RSPM levels were in range of 20.5 to 45.4 µg/m3, while SPM was in range of 43.1 to 99.7 µg/m3. The range of SO2 and NOX was 4.2 to 7.8 µg/m3 and 4.5 to 17.7 µg/m3 respectively. The CO was recorded less than 1 ppm.
Noise Levels Noise monitoring was carried out at four locations. The results of the monitoring program indicated that both the daytime and night time levels of noise were well within the prescribed limits NAAQS at all the four locations monitored.
Water Quality
2 Groundwater samples and 2 surface water samples were analyzed and concluded that the:
Ground water at the site is safe for use as potable water. Surface water is suitable for drinking purpose only after chemical
and biological treatment; however it is suitable for bathing purpose.
Soil Quality The proposed site is characterised by highly variable stratified soils. Soil of the area is neutral with pH of 7.3
Biological Environment
There are no Ecologically Sensitive Areas present in the study area, but many reserved forests regions surround the project area
Socio-economy The complete study area falls under Una District. The percentage of literate population is 87%. The sex ratio for the area is 977:1000. In the study area large number of people is found to be dependent on the agricultural activities.
ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATING MEASURES
Anticipated Impacts Due To Access Roads Plying of trucks and tractor trolleys from public road to river sand, stone and Bajri collection points needs access roads. Majority of such access roads are following the same alignment of existing roads/tracks being used by pedestrians/cart owners. Movement of heavy vehicles sometimes cause problems to cattle post, agriculture land, human habitations due to dust, noise and movement of public, and also causes traffic hazards. These environmental problems are felt more as the background is rural in nature.
7
Mitigation of Impacts on Access Roads Movement of the vehicles on the road will be increased; however, un metalled road in the sand and stone mining area will be sprinkled with water at regular intervals. In addition to prevent spillage by trucks and tractor trolleys over loading should be controlled along with speed limit. There will be minimum numbers of access roads to river bed, as cutting river banks should be avoided and ramps are to be maintained. Access points to the river bed are to be decided based on the following-
Least steepness of river bank,
Where steepness cannot be avoided access ramps should be constructed,
Haulage roads parallel to the river bank and roads connecting access (ramps) to the river bed shall be away from bank, preferably a minimum of 60 to 140 mts. away,
Access roads from the public roads and up to the river bank should be aligned in such a way that it would cause least environmental damage,
For particular operations approaching river bed from both the banks should be avoided.
Impact on Water Environment Damage in the water body, depends on its assimilative capacity. To find out assimilative capacity of receiving water body, water samples were collected from different Well, Bore Well, and other water bodies. The study indicates that assimilative capacity of the River water bodies still exists, but effective measures should be taken to check water pollution. To find out the effect on ground water an extensive hydro-geological study has been conducted and from the study it can be safely concluded that there is no noticeable effect on surrounding ground water resource due to mining. Therefore the water bodies will not be affected. The sand, Stone and Bajri mining activity will not have any significant impact on the water environment of the region. Mitigation Measures to Control Water Pollution
The major source of surface water pollution due to Sand, Stone and Bajri mining is insignificant.
Utmost care will be taken to minimize sand and stone spillage.
Drains and their Catchments will be constructed just beside the access roads so that the storm water gels settled before flowing to the river.
The washing of trucks and tractor trolleys in the river will be avoided.
Plantation along the river banks will be done in consultation with Village Panchayat to arrest the velocity of the storm water.
8
Impact on Air Environment Information on air quality was studied and concluded that the Sand, stone and Bajri’s mining activity will not affect the air quality in a significant manner. In Sand and Stone mining operations, loading, transportation and unloading operations may cause deterioration in air quality. The Sand and Stone collection and lifting is a manual operation. Therefore the dust generated is not so significant as compared to mining process of other hard minerals like the process of drilling, blasting, mechanized loading etc. Mitigation of Impact on Air Environment The only air pollution sources are the road transport network of the trucks and tractor trolleys. The dust suppression measures like water spraying will be done on the roads. Utmost care will be taken to prevent spillage of Sand and Stone from the trucks. Overloading will be prevented. The trucks will be covered by tarpaulin covers before dispatch to the crusher site . Plantation activities along the roads in consultation with Village Panchayat will also reduce the impact of dust in the nearby villages. Noise and Vibration Environment As there will be no heavy earth-moving machinery involved, there will not be any major impact on noise level due to sand and stone mining and other associated activities. A detailed noise survey has been carried out and results were cross referenced with standards and were found to be well within limits. Blasting technique is not used for sand and stone lifting, hence no possibility of land vibration. It was found that the sand and stone mining activity will not have any significant impact on the noise environment of the region. The only impact will be due to transportation of stone and sand by trucks. Mitigation of Noise and Vibration Environment As the only impact is due to transportation of stone/sand to the Stone Crusher through Village roads, emphasis will be given on the following points.
Minimum use of Horns at the village area. Timely maintenance of vehicles and their silencers to minimize vibration and
Sound. Phasing out of old and worn out trucks and trolleys. Provision of green belts along the road networks. Care will be taken to produce minimum sound during sand and stone loading.
Biological Environment The mining activity will have insignificant affect on the existing flora and fauna. Data has been collected from various Government Departments such as forests, agriculture, fisheries, animal husbandry and various offices to establish the pre project biological environmental conditions. The project area is surrounded by reserved forests on the banks are also lined with agricultural land. The purpose of the project itself is to save the flora around the project area from river widening, excessive erosion and floods. It was found that the sand mining activity will not have any significant impact on the biological environment of the region.
9
Mitigation of Impacts on Biological Environment There is a requirement to establish a stable ecosystem with both ecological and economic returns. Minimization of soil erosion and dust pollution enhances the beauty of the core and the buffer zone. To achieve this it is planned to increase plantation activities in consultation with Village Panchaayat. The basic objectives of plantations are as follows:-
Improvement of Soil quality Quick vegetative cover to check soil erosion Improvement in river bank stability Conservation of biological diversity Provide forage and browse for wild life
Greenbelt Development and Bio-Diversity Preservation
Plantation activities will be carried out from the profits in consultation with village Panchayat.
This activity will help for maintaining ecology and environment of the area. Socio-Economic Environment This project operation will provide livelihood to the poorest section of the society. Approximately 12-15people shall work at mine site and nearly 200 people are to be benefited directly or indirectly by the project. Anticipated impacts and evaluation The results of the field survey conducted to understand the knowledge and perception of the people living around the project area gives a clear idea about the need for the project. A major portion of the houses in the study area are pucca type structures. The water source to these areas is from the municipal connection and private bore wells. The awareness level regarding the proposed mining activity is very high. The proposed mining activity is expected to provide stimulus to socio-economic activities in the region and thereby accelerate further development processes. CONCLUSION: All possible environment aspects have been adequately assessed and necessary control measures have been formulated to meet statutory requirements thus implementing this project will not have any appreciable negative impacts.
0
(Submitted for Public Consultation as per EIA Notification)
FOR EXTRACTION OF SAND, STONE AND BAJRI
FROM SOAN RIVERBED
AREA 7-02-13 Ha
KHASRA No. 2074/2228,
FALLING IN MAUZA & MOHAL ANDORA NICHALA,
TEHSIL-AMB,
DISTRICT-UNA
HIMACHAL PRADESH
PROJECT PROPONENT:
RAM PRAKASH, S/o Sh AMAR NATH
PROP M/S MAHESH STONE CRUSHER,
VILLAGE & P.O. – KALRUCHI,
TEHSIL-AMB,
DISTRICT- UNA,
HIMACHAL PRADESH.
CONSULTANT:
SHIVALIK SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT LTD.
(UPL ENVIRO INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP CO),
P O DABHOTA, TEHSIL NALAGARH,
DIST. SOLAN, HIMACHAL PRADESH.
1
CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1-2
CROSS REFERENCE FOR TOR 3-7
EIA REPORT 8-80
CHAPTER-I INTRODUCTION 8-11
1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.2 SCOPE OF WORK FOR REIA/EMP
1.3 WORK PROGRAMME
1.4 METHODOLOGY ADOPTED
1.5 DATA COLLECTED
CHAPTER-II DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 12-30
2.1 INTRODUCTION
2.2 LOCATION
2.3 PHYSIOGRAPHY
2.4 DESCRIPTION OF RIVER & CATCHMENT AREA
2.5 REGIONAL GEOLOGY AND LOCAL GEOLOGY
2.6 RAINFALL AND SEDIMENT
2.7 MINING AREA,RESERVES OF DEPOSIT AND MINING METHODOLOGY
2.8 EMPLOYMENT GENERATION
2.9 RATE OF PRODUCTION
2.10 WASTE GENERATION
2.11 TRANSPORTATION
CHAPTER-III : STATUS OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 31-54
3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.2 STUDY AREA AT A GLANCE
3.3 LAND USE PATTERN
3.4 WATER ENVIRONMENT
3.5 HYDROLOGICAL ASPECTS
3.6 CLIMATIC CONDITION
3.7 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
3.8 NOISE ENVIRONMENT
3.9 TRAFFIC DENSITY
3.10 SOIL
3.11 BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS
3.12 MINING ON RIVER SOAN
3.13 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
CHAPTER-IV: ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
55-75
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.2 IMPACTS ON LAND ENVIRONMENT
4.3 IMPACTS ON WATER ENVIRONMENT
4.4 IMPACTS ON HYDROLOGY
4.5 IMPACTS ON CLIMATE
4.6 IMPACTS ON AIR ENVIRONMENT
4.7 IMPACTS ON NOISE LEVEL
2
4.8 IMPACTS ON BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS
4.9 IMPACTS DUE TO SOLID WASTE
4.10 IMPACTS ON SOIL
4.11 IMPACTS O CUMULATIVE MINING IN RIVER SOAN
4.12 IMPACTS ON SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
CHAPTER-V : ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE 63
5.1 MINING METHODOLOGY
5.2 LAND USE
CHAPTER VI : ENVIRONMENT MONITORING PROGRAM 64
6.0 INTRODUCTION
6.1 METHODOLOGY
CHAPTER-VII: ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN 65- 69
7.0 INTRODUCTION
7.1 LAND
7.2 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES
7.3 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES
7.4 NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES
7.5 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
7.6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
7.7 CONCLUSION
CHAPTER- VIII :ADDITIONAL STUDIES AND PROJECT BENEFITS 70
8.1 ADDITIONAL STUDIES
8.2 PROJECT BENIFITS
CHAPTER_IX : CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPOSIBILITY 71
LIST OF ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE-I COPY OF TOR ISSUED BY MOEF
ANNEXURE-II (A) APPROVAL LETTER FROM DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES,
GOVERNMENT OF H.P
ANNEXURE-II (B) LEASE DEED
ANNEXURE-III JOINT INSPECTION REPORT FROM SDM, FOREST
DEPARTMENT, POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, PWD AND
IPH DEPARTMENT
ANNEXURE-IV LIST OF FLORA & FAUNA , DEPARTMENT OF FOREST
ANNEXURE-V NOC FROM VILLAGE PANCHAYAT ANNEXURE-VI CONSULTANTS CREDENTIALS
3
TERMS OF REFERENCE AS ISSUED BY EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE ON
MINING PROJECTS IN ITS 16TH
MEETING HELD ON JUNE 21-23, 2011
S.
No.
ToR
Cross Ref. in EIA Report
1 A copy of the document in support of the fact that the
proponent is the rightful lessee of the mine should be given.
Grant of lease order
enclosed.
2. All documents including approved mine plan (eco friendly
mine plan), EIA report and public hearing should be
compatible with one another in terms of the mine lease area,
production levels, waste generation and its management and
mining technology.
Yes Chapter-I
provides details on
project; Lease deed at
Annexure-II and Eco
friendly Mining Plan.
3 The terms and conditions imposed, if any, by the Competent
Authority in the State Government while granting mining
lease/ permit/ contract should be built into the mine plan (eco
friendly mine plan) as well as the EIA report.
It may inter-alia include; area of working (length and breadth
of the river stretch), mode of working, working shift,
transportation of mineral, restriction, if any imposed for
working etc.
The chapter-V EMP
report includes
Mining Conditions.
Chapter II
4 Involvement of forestland, if any, in the project and status of
forestry clearance should be given.
No forestland is
involved in Mining
lease area.
Joint Inspection
Report by Government
of HP is at Annx -II
5 The study area will comprise of 10 km zone around the mine
lease from lease periphery and the data contained in the EIA
such as waste generation etc. should be for the life of the
mine/ lease period.
Chapter II and III
6 Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy
approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in
the EIA report.
The company shall
carry out mining as per
Mining plan.
7
Does the Environment policy prescribe for standard operating
process/procedures to bring into focus any
infringement/deviation/violation of the environmental or
forest norms/conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA
report.
As per approved
mining plan.
8 What is the hierarchical system or Administrative order of the The proprietor of the
4
company to deal with the environmental issues and for
ensuring compliance with the EC conditions? Details of this
system may be given.
co shall ensure the
compliance of EC
conditions.
9 Does the company have a system of reporting of non
compliances/ violations of environmental norms to the Board
of Directors of the company and /or shareholders or
stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism should be
detailed in the EIA report.
Proponent is bound to
comply the
environment norms as
laid down under
environment
regulations.
10 Land use of the study area delineating forest area, agricultural
land, grazing land, wildlife sanctuary and national park,
migratory routes of fauna, water bodies, human settlements
and ecological features.
Chapter III
11. Land use plan of the mine lease area should be prepared to
encompass pre-operational, operational and post-operational
phases.
Chapter III
12. Impact of the project on the wildlife in the surrounding and
any other protected area and accordingly detailed mitigation
measures required should be worked out with cost
implications.
Chapter IV.
13. The vegetation cover in the RF/PF in the study area, if any,
should be indicated.
Chapter III
14. A study shall be done to ascertain the impacts of the mining
project on wildlife of the area including aquatic life.
Chapter III,
Chapter IV
15. Location of National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves,
wildlife Corridors, Tiger/Elephant Reserves (existing as well
as proposed) within 10 km of the mine lease should be clearly
supported by a location map duly authenticated by Chief
Wildlife Warden. Necessary clearance from the Chief
Wildlife Warden for operating the mine within 10 km of the
National Park/Sanctuary, if any, should be obtained and
furnished.
Not Applicable
16. A detailed biological study for the study area [core zone and
buffer zone (10 km radius of the periphery of the mine lease)]
including the aquatic fauna in the riverine system shall be
carried out. Details of flora and fauna, duly authenticated,
separately for core and buffer zone should be furnished based
on field survey clearly indicating the Schedule of the fauna
present.
In case of any scheduled-I fauna present in the study area, the
Chapter III.
The- Soan River in
which mining is done
is a seasonal river with
little water to support
aquatic life.
5
necessary plan for their conservation should be prepared in
consultation with State Forest and wildlife Department and
details furnished. Necessary allocation of funds for
implementing the same should be made as part of the project
cost.
17.
Impact of the project on land use including change of river
course, if any should be given.
Chapter IV
18.
Impact on topography, drainage, agricultural fields, cattle
fields, wildlife, water logging leading to water borne diseases,
if any. It may also be shown whether it will lead to change of
watercourse of the river. Modeling exercise should also be
carried out through an expert agency to show the change in
river flow dynamics, if any.
Chapter IV
19.
Collection of one season (non-monsoon) primary baseline
data on ambient air quality (PM10, SO2 and NOX), water
quality, noise level, soil and flora and fauna, site-specific
meteorological data should be collected. The location of the
monitoring stations should be justified. Date wise collected
baseline AAQ data should form part of EIA and EMP report.
The mineralogical composition of PM10 particularly for free
silica should be given. There should be at least one AAQ
monitoring station within 500 m of the mine lease in the pre-
dominant downwind direction.
Chapter III
20.
Air quality modelling should be carried out for prediction of
impact of the project on the air quality of the area. It should
also take into account the impact of movement of vehicles for
transportation of mineral. The details of the model used and
input parameters used for modelling should be provided. The
air quality contours may be shown on a location map clearly
indicating the location of the site, location of sensitive
receptors, if any and the habitation. The wind roses showing
the pre-dominant wind direction may also be indicated on the
map.
Chapter-IV
21.
The water requirement for the project, its availability and
source to be furnished. A detailed water balance should also
be provided. Fresh water requirement for the project should be
indicated.
Chapter III, Chapter-
IV
22.
Necessary clearance from the Competent authority for drawl
Chapter-IV
6
of requisite quantity of water for the project should be
provided.
23.
Impact of the project on the water quality should be assessed
and necessary safeguard measures, if any required should be
provided.
Chapter IV
24.
Information on site elevation, working depth, groundwater
table should be provided both in AMSL and bgl. A schematic
diagram may also be provided for the same.
Chapter II ,Chapter III
25.
Quantity of solid waste generation, if any, should be estimated
and details for its disposal and management should be
provided.
Chapter II
26.
Impact on local transport infrastructure due to the project
should be evaluated. Projected increase in truck traffic as a
result of the project in the present road network (including
those outside the project area) and whether it is capable of
handling the increased load should be estimated. Arrangement
for improving the infrastructure, if contemplated including
action to be taken by other agencies such a state government,
if any, should be covered.
Chapter IV
27.
Details of the infrastructure facilities to be provided for the
mine workers should be furnished.
Chapter III
28.
Phase- wise plan of green belt development, plantation and
compensatory afforestation clearly indicating the area to be
covered under plantation and the species to be planted should
be provided.
Chapter IV
29.
Occupational health impacts of the project activity should be
anticipated and reported and proposed preventive measures
indicated. These along with details of pre-placement medical
examination and periodical medical examination schedules
and medical facilities proposed to be provided should be
incorporated in the EMP.
Chapter IV
30.
Measures of socio-economic influence to the local
community, proposed to be provided by project proponent
should be spelt out. As far as possible, quantitative
dimensions should be given.
Chapter IV & V
31.
Detailed environmental management plan to mitigate the
environmental impacts. Specific safeguard measures to
Chapter V
7
control PM10 as well as pollution due to transportation should
be given.
32.
Public hearing points raised and commitment of the project
proponent on the same along with time bound action plan to
implement the same should be provided.
Yes. Shall be
incorporated after
public hearing.
33.
Details of litigation pending against the project, if any, with
direction/order passed by any Court of Law against the project
should be given.
Not Applicable.
34.
The cost of the project (capital cost and recurring cost) as well
as the cost towards implementation of EMP should be clearly
spelt out.
Chapter V
8
CHAPTER- I
INTRODUCTION
M/s Mahesh Stone Crusher, C/o Sh. Amar Nath, R/o Village and P O Kalruchi, Tehsil Amb,
District Una, partnership concern for mining activity proposes to mine stone, bajri and sand.
The stone will be used in a captive stone crushing unit. The proponent has been granted
mining leases for mining sand; stone and bajri vide State Govt. letter no. Udyog – Bhu (Khani
- 4) Laghu – 261/08-3362 dated 05.07.10 over an area of 7-02-13 hectares situated in khasra
numbers 2074 & 2228 falling in mauza and mohal Andora Nichla,Tehsil Amb district Una of
Himachal Pradesh for a term of five years .
As per the EIA Notification, dated 14.09.2006 under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and
circular dated 06.02.2007, the mining of minerals more than 5 ha and with less than 50
hectare of mining lease area are categorized as Category-B projects, subject to the
applicability of General Conditions. This mining project falls in category-A as the site is
situated within 10 Km of interstate boundary with Punjab. All these mining projects are
statutorily required to conduct Environmental Impact Assessment study for obtaining
environmental clearance.
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Management Plan for
“Mining of Minerals” as per the EIA Notification, 2006 has been prepared in accordance to
Terms of reference issued by the Ministry of Environment & Forest vide their letter No. J –
11015/80/2011 – IA.II (M) dated 29th
July 2011 for mining of 74000TPA of Sand Stone and
Bajarifrom River bed of Soan River and the Environmental Impact Assessment Guidance
Manual published by MoEF for grant of environmental clearance with relevant project
specific data.
Crushed stone, gravel and sand are one of the largest non-fuel mineral commodities by
tonnage produced in Himachal Pradesh, supplying some of the most important construction
materials. Further, average unit value of crushed stone, sand and gravel is one of the lowest of
all mineral commodities.
This production of aggregate in a particular area is a function of the availability of natural
resources, the size of population, the economy of the area and various developmental and
infrastructural works being undertaken in the area like road construction, hydro-electric
projects etc. Further, being a low- value, high-volume mineral commodity, the prices are
dramatically affected by transportation distances. If the distances increase, the transportation
cost may increase much more than the cost of the aggregates.
9
A stable river is able to consistently transport the flow of sediments produced by watershed
such that its dimensions (width and depth) pattern and vertical profile are maintained without
aggrading (building up) or degrading (scouring down) The amount of boulders, cobbles,
pebbles and sand deposited in riverbed equals to the amount delivered to the river from
watershed and from bank erosion minus amount transported downstream each year.
Mining of the stones from river bed terrace is done, which are processed for production of
stone of various size, grit and sand essential for construction activities. Environmental
impacts can arise during all activities of the mining process. Minimizing the damage due to
mining operations depends on sound environmental practices in a framework of balanced
environmental legislation. The potential adverse effects of riverbed mining activities include
air pollution, surface water pollution, noise, damage to local ecology, natural topography and
drainage, depletion of water resources etc. All these environmental components have been
considered while selecting a proper methodology of mining, mitigation measures to reduce
pollution load, conservation of natural resources, etc.
1.1 SCOPE OF WORK FOR REIA/EMP
This EIA/EMP report is prepared as per the guidelines of the Ministry of Environment &
Forest, New Delhi & is based on observations made by Expert Team during their visit to the
area in the study period and collection of primary as well as secondary environmental data.
1.2 WORK PROGRAMME
The disciplines covered under the work programme are, prerequisite information of the site,
impacts and management plans. The above disciplines include the following method of
collection & compilation of data and the resulting predictions.
i) Preparation of a check – list including the details of type and class of information
required developing an environmental impact assessment report.
ii) Major environmental aspects (including testing etc.) Covered under the study are:
Selection of the appropriate sampling stations for Soil, Water & Air within Core &
Buffer zone of 10 Km radius.
The offices of villages - Panchayats and Tehsils of study area were approached for
their socio-economic status, standards of living, and possible impacts on their status
by the new mine.
Besides the above-mentioned information, the concerning meteorological department
was also contacted for the meteorological data like Rainfall, Wind, Temperature &
Humidity
The data were then compiled and results were interpreted in the form of Graphs,
Figures, Tabulations and Illustrations.
10
iii) The impacts were predicted on the basis of an environmental score chart, which assigns
the scores, positive or negative on a ranking score of various activities chosen, thus
showing the positive or negative impact on account of various activities of mine.
iv) Environmental Management Plan prepared for mining project, suggesting various
mitigation measures to reduce/eliminate adverse impacts of the river bed mining and
other aspects as may be required by the concerned authorities.
1.3 METHODOLOGY ADOPTED
On the basis of a quick assessment of the environmental conditions at the mine site and the
nature of adjoining area, it was found that the mining lease site as its centre was considered as
core zone where fugitive emission of the mining activity can have an impact on physical and
biological environments. Area within 10 km. radius circle was considered as buffer zone,
where only slight impact may be observed occasionally.
1.4 DATA GENERATION
The baseline data for the project site and 10 km radius area were collected in accordance with
the requirement of guidelines of MoEF. Monitoring was done for summer season (Oct.2011 -
to Dec. 2011) for the following parameters: -
1. AIR- Ambient air monitoring (24 hourly samples), twice a week continuously.
Parameters: SPM, SO2, NOx, RSPM, Silica content in SPM and RSPM.
2. METEOROLOGICAL- Parameters at hourly duration simultaneously at one air
monitoring station. Parameters: Wind speed, direction, Relative humidity,
Temperature, cloudiness and rainfall etc.
3. WATER- Water from various locations (surface and ground water samples) in core
and buffer zone 10 km radius) Parameters: water/effluents: tested for physical and
chemical and biological parameters as well as according to applicable standards.
4. SOIL- Once at various locations in core and buffer zone.
5. NOISE- Once at various locations in core and buffer zone.
1.5 DATA COLLECTED
Meteorological data collection instruments were set near the mine site during the study period
(post monsoon Season Oct2011 – Dec 2011).
11
A large number of gaseous, water and soil samples were collected and analysed. Analysed
samples include the following: -
� Ambient air quality samples at 4 locations in different directions at different distances.
� 4 numbers of water samples collected from river Beas, up and down stream and hand
pumps.
� Soil samples from 2 different locations.
� Noise level measurement was carried out by a precision sound level meter (Model
Envirotech SLM 100) at the sampling stations.
In addition to the above, the data on land use, vegetation and agricultural crops were also
collected from different Government departments / agencies for the preparation of EIA
report.
12
CHAPTER II
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
2.0 INTRODUCTION.
The Project proponent Shri Ram Prakash son of Shri Amar Nath ,properiter , M/s Mahesh
Stone Crusher, resident of village Kalruhi, Tehsil Amb, District Una , Himachal Pradrsh has
been granted a mining lease under H P Minor Minerals ( Concessions) revised Rules 1971,
for mining sand ,stone and bajari vide State Government letter No.Udyog-Bhu (Khani-4)
Laghu-261/08-3362 dated 05/07/2010 over an area of 7-02-13 hactare situated in khasra No.
2074 & 2228 falling in mauza & mohal Andora Nichla ,Tehsil Amb district Una ,HP for a
period of five years. The project involves mining / collection 74000 metric tons of stone and
bajri from Soan (Swan) river bed for a stone crushing unit set by the project proponent.
The chapter deals with the location, physiographic feature of the area, description and
characteristics of catchment area, regional / catchment area and local geology, rainfall and its
impact on transportation of sediments, mineral reserves, method of mining, annual rate of
production and generation of waste.
The lease is situated in the Soan (Swan)River, a primary tributary of the Satluj River. The
Soan River originates near Dharmsal village in Amb Tehsil of District Una at a height of
about 986 Meter. The Soan catchment draining about 1215 Sq Km of Shiwalik ranges, lying
between 31° 15’ North to 31°-50’ North latitude and 75°-57’ to 76°25’ East longitude and is
divided into 52 sub catchments, generally forming drainage network of tributaries. Its merges
with Satluj River near village Ahilpur of tahsil Anandpur, District Roper of Punjab, at 299
metres from MSL.
2.1 LOCATION.
The proposed mining site is located in the river bed of Soan River falling in villageAndola
Nichla Tehsil Amb, District Una of Himachal Pradesh. The area is cover by Survey of India
Toposheet No. 53 A/ 2. The mine is about eight kilometers from Una , tahsil head quarter.
Table 2.1: Showing coordinates of boundary pillars shown in figure 2.1.
Latitude Longitude 31
039’ 10.6” N 76
0 05’ 31.8”E
30039’ 10” N 76
0 05’ 38.5”E
13
FIGURE 2.1: CO-ORDINATES AND LOCATION OF MINING LEASE ARE ON
SATELLITE IMAGERY (COURTESY GOOGLE EARTH).
2.2 PHYSIOGRAPHY
The area falls in the Soan catchment and forms a typical rugged sub mountainous terrain with
steep slopes and narrow as well as wide valleys. The valley Soan River is called Jaswan Dun
with Siwalik hills running north west to south east on either side of the river.
2.2.1. Ridges: On the eastern side the North west- South east running Chintpurni Dhar from
village Dharmsal near point 986, extends south east Bharwain to points 879, 886, 973
and turns South West for a short distance along Dhlonsar Dhar at 950 and from 848 it
turns west and South west points 702, 691 then turns south to points 715, 823, 909,
597 along Bangar di Dhar and turns South- South-South-East and then turn to South
west to points 402, 402, B.M. 381, 353, 338, 328 to village Ahilgarh where the ridge
dips in to confluence of Soan and Satluj Rivers. In the west watershed ridges separating Soan catchment from Khads of Punjab plains
follows North West – South East running Kater Dhar along points 628, 656, 638, ∆
606, 592, 625, 606, 628, 623, 570, 598, 609, 630, 650, 637, 609, 610, 594, 541, 547,
563, 613, 589, 576, 583, 590 and turns east to village Binewal at point 506 and again
14
turns south east to point 508, 531, and 521 towards confluence of Soan with River
Satluj.
2.2.2 Drainage: The Soan River, one of the important tributaries of the Satluj River, carries
the main drainage of the area Una district. The Soan generally has a south easterly
flow. It has more tributaries on the left bank side than on the right bank side
indicating drainage pattern in the catchment is controlled by geological structure. The
major tributaries of the Soan River are listed below in the Table 2.1.
TABLE 2.1; TRIBUTARIES OF SOAN RIVER
Sr. No Tributary Catchment Area
( Sq. Km )
Bank
1 Barera Khad 96.4 Left
2 Garni Khad 74.1 Left
3 Panjoa Khad 68.4 Left
4 Khurd Di Khad 54.2 Left
5 Hum Khad 45.3 Right
6 Ambwali Khad 45.2 Left
7 Borewali Khad 36.9 Left
8 Swan River Bed 36.75
9 Salohwali Khad 35.7 Left
10 Takewali Khad 32.4 Left
11 Chatterpur Khad 29.8 Left
12 Gubri Khad 24.2 Left
13 Badera Khad 23.25 Right
14 Jadela Khad 22.25 Right
15 Sunkaliwali Khad 21.2 Left
16 Pangota Khad 19.25 Right
17 Una Di Khad 18.6 Left
18 Nakroh Khad 18.2 Left
19 Bhadsali Khad 16.25 Right
20 Badohwali Khad 15.8 Right
21 Nagnuli Khad 15.75 Right
22 Saloh Khad 14.9 Right
23 Gadrala Khad 13.5 Right
24 Kajni Khad 12.8 Left
25 Bhaderkali Khad 12.3 Left
26 Ispur Khad 12.25 Right
27 Baliwal Khad 11.5 Right
28 Sharahan Khad 10.8 Right
29 Khadwalli Khad 10.5 Right
30 Chota Har Khad 10.2 Left
31 Tatera Khad 9.75 Right
32 Gohar Nala 9.75 Right
33 Bharampur Khad 9.52 Left
34 Gagret Khad 8.5 Right
15
35 Gondpur Banera Khad 8.1 Left
36 Ambota Khad 7.75 Right
37 Dhakki Khad 7.25 Right
38 Narer Khad 6.75 Right
39 Nangal Kalan Khad 6.75 Right
40 Padauri Khad 6.25 Right
41 Sanhal Khad 6.15 Right
42 Ghanari Khad 5.75 Right
43 Nangal Jarial Khad 5.5 Right
44 Mawa-Tatera Khad 4.5 Right
45 Paruwali Khad 4.25 Right
46 Mawa Khad 3.5 Right
47 Bhutawali Khad 2.75 Right
48 Ajhar Nala 2.75 Right
49 Chalet Khad 2.12 Right
50 Deuli Khad 1.9 Right
51 Amboa Khad 1.5 Right
52 Other Small
Catchment
235.51
Total 1215.2
Several low order streams join to give the area a distinct drainage pattern, which is a
combination of trellis and dendritic patterns. The trellis pattern is more prominent, thus
emphasizing structural control on the drainage. The dendritic part is mainly confined to
low order streams, which follow the natural slopes of the young mountain.
The area has a drainage density of the order of 0.58 to 3.26 (Kms per square km). In
general sandstone and conglomerate rocks constitute steep slopes, while the gentler
slopes are provided by the friable sand stone and clay sequence. Down cutting by the
rivers is evident by terraces preserved at different levels.
2.2.3 Springs: Springs are the main source of potable water, though the discharge in some of
them is greatly reduced during the summer months.
2.3 DESCRIPTION OF SOAN RIVER & CATCHMENT AREA
The lease is situated in the River Soan, a primary tributary of the River Satluj. The Soan
River originates near Dharmsal village at 310 50’ 76
0 25’ in Amb Tehsil of District Una at a
height of about 986 Meter.
The general gradient of the river in the catchment is given below.
16
FIGURE 2.2: SLOPE GRADIENT, OF SOAN RIVER FROM ORIGIN TO
CONFLUENCE WITH SATLUJ RIVER.
GEOMETRY OF SOAN RIVER
Soan is a right bank tributary of Sutluj River.
Catchment Area of Soan River: 1215 Square Kms.
Altitude at origin: 986 metres from M S L.
Altitude at Confluence with Sutluj River: 299 metres from M S L.
Total Elevation Loss: 687 metres
Total length of River course: 98.2 kms
Elevation loss per kilometer: 7 metres
Young Stage 0-16 kms
Elevation loss per Kilometre: 44 metres
Maturity Stage: 16-41.5 kms
Elevation loss per Kilometre: 6 metres
Old age Stage up to confluence: 56.7 Kms onwards
Elevation loss per Kilometre: 1.75 metres.
17
FIGURE 2.3:SHOWING STREAM STAGES AND RIVER COURSE
GRADIENT OF SOAN RIVER.
TABLE -2.2 CATCHMENT OF RIVER SOAN
S.
No.
Elevation from
M S L
Zone Stream Stage Slope Angle
1. From origin to the
600 metres above
mean sea level
The zone of active
erosion
Young stage 20 32’
2. From 600 metres
to 400 metres
contour to
confluence
The zone of
erosion during
very high floods;
otherwise
deposition
Maturity stage 00 21’
3. Less than 400
metres contour to
confluence
The Zone of
deposition only
except very high
and rare flood
Old stage
00 06’
The lease area is situated in the zone of Mature stage
18
FIGURE: 2.4 SHOWING THE CATCHMENTS OF THE RIVER SOAN RIVER.
Catchment of Soan River
With Effective Catchment of Lease Area
19
TABLE 2.3 CHARACTERISTICS OF SOAN RIVER CATCHMENT.
S.
No. Heading Characteristics
a) Name of River/ Stream in
which the lease is situated
The lease is situated in the Soan River, a primary
tributary of the River Satluj.
b) Drainage System Satluj
c) Type of Drainage Dendritic (Figure )
d) Origin of River/Stream
The Soan River originates near Dharmsal village
at 310 50’ 76
0 25’ in Amb Tehsil of District Una at
a height of about 986 Meter.
e) Altitude at Origin 986 mts above MSL.
f) Altitude at Mining lease. 437 mts above MSL
g) Area of Catchment 1215 square kilometres.
h) Area of Effective
Catchment of Lease area.
About 270 square kilometres
i) Width of River at the
place of Mining
Width if Soan River near the mining lease area
around 300 Metres near the lease area.
j) The annual deposition at
the place of mining.
The annual deposition at the mining lease area is
one to four Cms depending upon the location. At
some places it may be more than the five Cm.
k) The Competency of the
River/ Stream at the
mining site
The general competency at the mining area is six
to ten Kg approx. The larger boulders vary 9 to 10
cm X 8 to 110 cm X 7 to 8 cm (length X breath X
height) (Photo 1). However exceptionally large
boulders are also observed indicating ferocity of
river flow during high floods.
l) The level of HFL
During monsoon high floods the water level rises
up to about two meters, at times for short spells.
m) The thread of deepest
water in meandering.
The landform being depositional the meandering
thread is constantly changing during the rainy
season depending upon the water level.
20
PHOTO 1: SHOWING RIVER BED GEOLOGY OF SOAN RIVER AT LEASE
AREA.
2.4 REGIONAL GEOLOGY AND LOCAL GEOLOGY.
The Siwalik Group mainly represents the rocks of the district. In addition to this at few
places the Newer alluvium of Quaternary age are also present.
Siwalik Group
The Siwalik deposits are one of the most comprehensively studied fluvial sequences in the
world. They comprise mudstones, sandstones, and coarsely bedded conglomerates laid down
when the region was a vast basin during Middle Miocene, to Upper Pleistocene times. The
sediments were deposited by rivers flowing southwards from the Greater Himalayas,
resulting in extensive multi-ordered drainage systems. Following this deposition, the
sediments were uplifted through intense tectonic regimes (commencing in Upper Miocene
times), subsequently resulting in a unique topographical entity - the Siwalik Hills. The
21
Siwaliks are divided stratigraphically into three major Subgroups - Lower, Middle, and
Upper. These Subgroups are further divided into individual Formations that are all laterally
and vertically exposed today in varying linear and random patterns.
Ongoing erosion and tectonic activity has greatly affected the topography of the Siwaliks.
Their present-day morphology is comprised of hogback ridges, consequent, subsequent,
obsequent, and resquent valleys of various orders, gullies, choes (seasonal streams), earth-
pillars, rilled earth buttresses of conglomerate formations, semi-circular choe-divides, talus
cones, colluvial cones, water-gaps, and choe terraces. Associated badlands features include
the lack of vegetation, steep slopes, high drainage density, and rapid erosion rates.
In the advent of Neogene a depression was formed in front of the rising mountains (Proto-
Himalaya). This depression becomes a repository of a thick sequence of molassic sediments
of the Siwalik. The Siwalik Group comprising conglomerates friable micaceous sandstone,
siltstone and claystone.
The conglomerates in general are poorly cemented but at places they are very hard. These
consist mainly of pebbles and cobbles of quartzite. The stray pebbles of granite, limestone,
sandstone, braccia and lumps of claystone are also observed at places. Often the size of
pebbles is large enough to be called as Boulders. The conglomerates not only occur as
regular band but also as lenticular bands alternative with micaceous sandstone and claybeds.
The sediments were bought down 2 to 25 million years ago by the numerous fast flowing
rivers issuing forth from rapidly Rising Mountain mass of the Himalaya, in the north.
The Siwalik Group is divisible into three sub-groups respectively the Lower, Middle and
Upper on the basis of the litho stratigraphy (Table 2.4)
22
TABLE: 2.4: LITHO-STRATIGRAPHY OF THE SOAN RIVER AND
SURROUNDING AREAS IN DISTRICT UNA.
Group Lithology Age Approx.
Thickness
Newer Alluvium Sand, silt, gravel and Pebbles Quatenary Variable
Siw
ali
k G
roup
Upper
Siwalik
B
Predominantly massive
conglomerate with red and
orange clay as matrix and
minor sandstone and earthy
buff and brown calystone
Neo
gen
e
2300 meter
A
Sandstone, clay and
conglomerate alternation
Middle
Siwalik
B
Massive Sandstone with minor
conglomerate and local
variegated claystone
1400 to
2000 meter
A
Predominantly medium to
coarse- grained sandstone and
red clay alternation, soft
pebbly with subordinate
claystone, locally thick prism
of conglomerate
Lower
Siwalik
B
Alternation of fine to medium-
grained sporadically pebbly
sandstone, calcareous cement
and prominent chocolate and
medium maroon claystone in
the middle part
1600 meter
A Red and mauve claystone with
thin intercalations of medium
to fine grained sandstone
23
FIGURE: 2. 5 GEOLOGICAL MAP OF THE REGION.
24
Lower Siwalik: - The lower Siwalik consists essentially of a sandstone-clay alternation.
In district Una the lower sequence of the lower Siwalik consists of medium grained sub
greywacke inter bedded with thick red clay, but higher up in sequence, sandstones are
coarser and clasts become more frequent while the clays are less developed. The
uppermost horizon consists of conglomerate with well-rounded clasts of grey quartzite
possible derived from the Shali. The total thickness is 1600 mts .
Middle Siwalik: - The Middle Siwalik Sub group comprises of large thickness of coarse
micaceous sandstone along with some interbeds of earthy clay and conlomerate. It
normally succeeds the Lower Siwalik along a gradational contact. The sandstone is less
sorted than those in Lower Siwalik. Clay bends are dull coloured and silty. The general
thickness is 1400 to 2000 mts
Upper Siwalik:-The Upper Siwalik is mainly represented by sandstone interbedded with
silt and conglomerate. The lower portion of the Upper Siwalik mainly consists of soft,
massive, pebbly sandstone with itercalations of conglomerates. In the upper portion the
conglomerate intercalation is replaced by the clays intercalations. The general thickness
in the district is 2300 mts.
Newer Alluvium:-The Newer alluvium deposit occupying the wide valleys including
alluvium fans and terraces of unsorted sand, silt and clay and rock fragment and boulder
beds.
2.4 RAINFALL
In a normal rainfall, raindrops range in size from 1 to 7 millimeters in diameter and hit the
ground going as fast as 20 miles per hour. The impact of millions of raindrops hitting the
bare soil surface can be incredible, dislodging soil particles and splashing those one to one
and a half metres away.
A heavy rainstorm may splash as much as 90 tons of soil per acre. Most of the splashed soil
particles don't leave the field; they clog surface pores, which in turn reduce water infiltration,
increases water runoff, and increases soil erosion.
The monsoon, which produces the heaviest precipitation over long periods (most world
records of rainfall rates for periods greater than 12 hours are a result of monsoons).
25
FIGURE:2.6: MONTH WISE RAINY DOES INDICATING RAINY
SEASON FROM MID JUNE TO MID SEPTEMBER.
The monsoon rains set in motion the process of erosion of the rocks in the catchment area.
Erosion is the set of all processes by which soil and rock are loosened and moved downhill or
down slope. The splash erosion by the rain drops loosens the soil, joints, fractures, matrix of
the coarsely bedded conglomerates. The most important process of erosion is due to running
water. The amount of erosion of a slope depends on:
o The length and steepness of the slope (Figure 2.2 & 2.3).
o The rainfall intensity (Figure 2. 6 & 2. 7).
o The permeability and structure of the surface of rocks (figure 2.5).
o The amount of vegetation cover.
26
FIGURE 2.1 MONTHLY RAINFALL FROM 2005-2010, DISTRICT UNA IN MM
The rocks in the catchment area belong to Siwalik Formation (Figure 2.5). These
formations comprise siltstones, sandstones, and coarsely bedded conglomerates. Rock or
soil that is already loose is easily dislodged and washed away in heavy rainstorms. The
water enters the joints and cracks in the rock and widens them, making them more prone
to weathering. These loosened rocks and boulders are carried down the slopes by rain
storm waters. These reach the Soan river which transport it downstream.
Deposition occurs when a loss of energy results in a decrease in velocity. This may be due
to such things as declining gradient (figure 1), a decrease in water volume, an increase
in cross-sectional area Figure 6, or by local obstructions. An excessive load produced by
increased erosion in the drainage basin or tributary valleys, inevitably lead to deposition.
The accumulations of stream deposits are called alluvium.
These rocks suffer erosion during the rainy season and especially on the days of heavy
rainfall (Figure 2.5) and due to steep gradient in the hill region carry down the boulders
from the conglomerates and mud and sand from siltstone and sandstone and other
formations.
Near the mining lease area the gradient of the river is gentler figure 2.2. Thus the area is
most amenable to the deposition of stone, sand and bajri.
Pits / depressions created during the extraction of minerals get replenished during the
monsoon period.
27
2.5 MINING AREA, RESERVES OF DEPOSIT AND MINING METHODOLOGY.
The lease area is situated well within the meandering corridor of Soan River. The
mining lease area is 7.0213 hectares of river bed of Soan River.
Mining area is defined after considering the 1/5 of width from the HFL that is 60-80
meters, depending upon the width which 300 to 400 meters.
Mining is proposed at safe distance of 75 meters from the Flood protection wall on the
left bank. The mine able area thus calculated is 66000 square metres out of the total lease area of
70213 square meters.
2.5.1 Exploration
In order to calculate the percentage of various sediments found in the River bed, a
trial pit was dug, at a most representative site, having dimensions of 1 m. * 1 m. * 1
m. (Length * width * depth). The content of the total material dug out from the pits
were separated into five categories i.e. stone, bajri (cobbles), sand, silt and clay. The
percentage of the each category was found to be stone 35 %, bajri 25 %, sand 25%,
silt 10% and clay 5%. The percentage of these constituents is likely varied from year
to year depending upon amount and ferocity of rainfall.
Depth of one meter from the surface is considered for calculation of the reserve.
The specific gravity of Quartzite is 2.65 and of sand is 1.85. Hence average specific
gravity of 2.25 is taken for calculation of the deposit.
Geological reserves thus calculated area 70213*2.25=say 158000 metric tons.
2.5.2 Mineable Reserve
The of mineable reserves were estimated by multiplying the surface area, suitable
for mining after subtracting the safety zones on either side i.e. 66000 square metres
with specific gravity and depth of one metre (66000*2.25*1)up to which the mining
shall be undertaken. Thus a total of 148500 metric ton of material is available in the
mineable area of 66000 squares.
2.5.3 Mining method
The mining method shall be adopted to facilitate the replenishment of the excavated
pits during rainy season. Thus the mineable area has been divided in two blocks. The
up steam block is 33,000 square metres and the downstream block is 33,000 square
metres. The Mining of these two blocks is suggested on rotation basis in such a way
that pit of previous year mining will act as depository for the post monsoon season
28
FIGURE-2.2: CONTOUR AND WORKING PLAN OF THE MINING LEASE AREA.
The workability is suggested by keeping in the mind possible effect on the
meandering of Khad. The previous year pit will reduce the velocity of the flow of the
River waters and thus reducing its carrying capacity resulting in deposition material
being transported by the River waters. In totality the principal of the Placer Deposit is
adopted.
The working period for mining will be restricted to 270 days and during three month
of rainy season no mining shall be undertaken.
The mining operations in the lease area would be confined to day light hours, from 9
A.M. to 5 P. M.
Thus virtually each block would be rested for replenishment for two consecutive
monsoons.
The mining shall be done manually. No mining machinery shall be deployed.
The highest contour in the lease area is 450 and lowest is 449 metres above mean sea
level, therefore mining would be undertaken/limited up to the level of 449 to 448
metres above MSL.
The material is sorted manually at mining site and sand is separated from stone and
bajri.
The sorted stone and bajri is than loaded into trolleys by shovels and pans and
transported to the crusher site.
29
2.6 EMPLOYMENT GENERATION:
The mining activity in the lease area will thus give direct employment to about 12 persons
engaged in extraction of stone, bajri and sand; loading of material into tractor trolleys and
tipper trucks. The stone and bajri shall be transported to the crusher. Thus, for transportation
of material about three to four drivers and equal number of helpers shall be engaged. At the
crusher about 6 skilled and semiskilled workers are deployed. Moreover, the construction
industry using the raw material from the mine will generate employment for more than 200
skilled and semi skilled workers. Thus, the production of construction aggregates, such as
sand stone and bajri has tremendous impact on multiple generation of employment in
downstream activities.
2.7 RATE OF PRODUCTION
The proposed rate of production, every year, would be about 74000 metric tons of material to
be excavated. Though 11000 metric tons would be waste in the form of silt and clay which
will be used for back filling the pits. 63000 metric tons of commercially sale able stone, bajri
and sand would be moved. Thus, about 44500 metric tons of stone and bajri suitable for
crushing would be transported to the crushing unit, and 18500 metric tons of sand would be
sold at mining site directly.
No blasting shall be undertaken to break the large boulders. The boulders larger than two feet
will not be disturbed as per policy of the state Government, so that these act as obstruction to
the flood waters and assist in deposition of material in the lease area.
The production proposed during five years of mining according to approved mining plan is as
given in the table below
TABLE 2.5 PRODUCTION PLAN FOR FIVE YEARS, IN METRIC TONS.
Year Boulders
River born
bajri Sand Total
First 26000 18500 18500 63000
Second 26000 18500 18500 63000
Third 26000 18500 18500 63000
Fourth 26000 18500 18500 63000
Fifth 26000 18500 18500 63000
Total 130000 92500 92500 315000
As the demand for construction aggregate would increase in the future the production rate per
years will remain at optimum level of 77400 metric tons of stone, bajri and sand.
30
2.8 WASTE GENERATION
During the excavation of stone, bajri and sand from the river bed silt and clay are also
quarried being associated minerals. The silt and clay which will be generated to the extent of
11000 metric tons per year will be left in the pits as back fill. The silt and clay being the
lightest of the sediment load in the flowing river water is carried downstream by even the
lightest floods during the onset of monsoons., Sand particles range in diameter from
0.0625mm (or 1⁄16 mm, or 62.5 μm) to 2 mm. Particles smaller than sand fall in the category
of silt and clay. Silt and clay in the river water are derived mostly from erosion of soil cover
and weathered rocks and are generally suitable for agricultural field. As the silt and clay do
not contain any harmful constituents, therefore their carriage/movement further downstream
would not create any harmful environmental impact.
TABLE 2.6 YEARLY GENERATION OF WASTE
Year / Category Silt Clay Total
First Year 7400 3600 11000
Second Year 7400 3600 11000
Third Year 7400 3600 11000
Fourth Year 7400 3600 11000
Fifth Year 7400 3600 11000
• Total 37000 18000 55000
Land use plan of mine lease.
The mining lease area falls within the meandering corridor of the river course, below the high
flood level. It therefore cannot be put to any other use. Before the lease was granted it was
part of the river course. During the mining of river bed, as the mining would be resorted to a
depth of one metre only, the land form is not likely to change. Rather the river course, which
at present is flowing more near the banks may shift towards centre. Thus, the mining activity
in the centre of the river bed may to some extent help in its channelization. Post mining also
the area will remain part of active river course.
2.8 TRANSPORTATION.
The lease area is having gentle slope with the gradient of 6’ or elevation fall of 2.6
metre per kilometre hence, tracks for the movement of trucks and tractors can be made
and maintained in any part of the lease area.
The loaded tractor trolleys / tipper trucks would carry the material to the crusher site, at a
distance of about 8 kilometres from the mining site. About 165 metric tons of stone and
bajri would be required to be moved daily. Four tipper trucks will be able to move this
material making about five trips each.
31
CHAPTER-III
DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The main objectives of environmental baseline study are:
(i) To assess present environmental quality for prediction of environmental impacts.
(ii) To identify environmentally significant factors for taking mitigating measures.
The chapter contains information on existing environmental status of land, air, water , biological
& socio economic environment. The mining activity will remain confined to very small area and
of little magnitude hence the zone of influence will be only surrounding fields of the leased out
area.To achieve these objectives, monitoring of the environmental parameters within the core
zone and buffer zone has been undertaken in accordance with the Terms of Reference and
Guidelines for EIA issued by the Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govt. of India.
This chapter and the related discussions contain the results of field studies carried out during post
monsoon season..
3.2 STUDY AREA AT A GLANCE
10 km radius measured from the boundaries of the mining lease in every direction and also
includes mining lease area, i.e. core zone. The study area ie core area and buffer zone area is
shown in figure
LOCATION
Toposheet No 53A/2
Village –Andora Nichla
Tehsil Amb
District Una
32
FIGURE3.1 SHOWING CORE & BUFFER AREA UP TO 10 KMS
33
3.3. LAND USE PATTERN
Core Zone
The proposed Mining lease area is located on the riverbed of Soan river and is classified as gair
mumkin khad as per revenue record. The land shall be used for undertaking mining activity.
Buffer Zone
Primarily the land of the district can be classified in following 6 categories as shown in figure 3.2
i. Forest
ii. Grass And Scrub Land
iii. Water Bodies
iv. Arable Land Un-irrigated
v. Arable Land Irrigated
vi. Urban Settlement.
FIGURE 3.2: SHOWING GENERAL LAND USE PATTERN OF THE DISTRICT UNA.
34
The Fact file of the district, classified the land available in the district Una into following 7
categories as shown in figure 3.3
FIGURE 3.3 THE TOTAL LAND OF EACH CATEGORY IN SQ. KM
The District Census Handbook 2001 classified the land available in surrounding villages into
following five categories as shown in figure 3.4
FIGURE 3.4 SHOWING LAND USE PATTERN OF VILLAGES AROUND THE MINING
LEASE AREA. (Census 2001)
1549.00
185.00 430.00
226.70 294.00 129.40 55.40 78.40
To
tal G
eo
gra
ph
ica
l a
rea
o
f th
e D
istr
ict
Fo
res
t A
rea
Cu
ltiv
ate
d A
rea
Ba
rre
n&
Un
cu
ltu
rab
le
La
nd
s
La
nd
pu
t to
No
n-A
gri
. U
se
s
Pe
rma
ne
nt
Pa
stu
res
&
Oth
er
Gra
ss
La
nd
s
La
nd
Un
de
r M
isc
. T
ree
, C
rop
s a
nd
Gro
ve
s
Irri
ga
ted
Are
a
Square Kilometres
District Una Land Use Pattern
MAJHLIAN
JAKHERA
BAN GARH
JAIRI MEHATPU
R
BHATOLI
UPPERLI
BHATOLI
NICHLI
Total Area 321 200 789 67 55 41
Forest Land 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Irrigated 0 67 60 28 27 16
Unirrigated 98 86 137 27 13 16
Culturable waste 152 17 137 1 2 1
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Hectares
Villages
L and Use Pattern of Villges Around Mining Lease Area
35
3.3.1 LAND USE FOR AGRICULTURE
Most of Una area consists of foot hills and Soan valley up to elevation of 600 metres above
mean sea level with sub tropical climate. The soils are mostly sandy loam in texture with
scattered loamy patches. The area is highly prone to erosion due to weak geological
formations and scanty vegetation. The moisture retention capacity is poor. The crops usually
face moisture stress during the remaining period of the year due to inadequate and irregular
rainfall. The irrigation facilities are provided by lifting water from steams, shallow dug wells
and medium to deep tube wells in the valley area.
Major food crops are grouped into three categories:
1. Cereals
2. Pulses
3. Other food crops like Chilies, ginger, sugarcane and turmeric.
Non- food crop area is of two kinds:
1. Oil seeds
2. Other non-food crops such as cotton, tobacco and fodder crop
The main crops grown in the area are Wheat, Maize, Gram, paddy, Mustard, Sugarcane,
Potato, Vegetables, and Citrus etc
The area under each category of the crop is given below in figure -3.5
3.3.2 LAND USE FOR HORTICULTURE
The topography and the agro- climatic conditions of the district are quite suitable for the
production of the various fruits. The topography of the district can be grouped into three
categories namely high hill areas located at a higher elevation, mid hill areas and low lying valley
areas. Fruits of various kinds depending upon the terrain, climatic condition and soil are grown in
the district.
The area under each fruit and Percent age of area to total district area as well as the %age of the
area under fruit in each category is given in Figure 3.6 showing area covered under each
category and the total production as per 2005- 2006 survey conducted by Govt of HP
36
FIGURE 15 SHOWING AREA UNDER DIFFERENT CROPS IN
UNA DISTRICT
FIGURE 2 : SHOWING AREA OF EACH CATEGORY OF FRUIT
IN DISTRICT UNA.
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
Rice Maize Wheat
Barley Pulses Ragi Common
Millets
Total Foograins
Chillies
Ginger
Hectares 2019 30672 31417 0 566 0 0 64674 6 3
Area under Major Crops, District Una, in Hectares.
0 500
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Apple Other Temperat
e Fruits
Sub-Tropical
Fruits
Nuts & Dry Fruits
Citrus Fruits
Total
Hectares 0 977 2251 126 1497 4851
Area under Horticulture, District Una, in Hectares (2006).
37
3.4 WATER ENVIRONMENT
The lease is situated in the Soan River, a primary tributary of the Satluj River. The Soan River
originates near Dharmsal village in Amb Tehsil of District Una at a height of about 986 Meter.
The Soan catchment drainage is divided into 52 sub catchments, generally forming drainage
network of tributaries. Its merges with Satluj River near village Ahilpur of tehsil Anandpur,
District Roper of Punjab, at 299 metres from MSL.
.
During the survey samples of water upstream and downstream of leased area were collected and
analyzed. The ground water level of the study area is not likely to be affected, because the mining
activities shall be carried on river bed and much above water table.
3.4.1 SURFACE WATER QUALITY
As stated above, the mining lease area is located on Soan riverbed a tributary of Satluj River. It is
joined by many seasonal / perennial streams of various dimensions both from north and south
directions.
Requirement of water in the area is mostly met from surface water sources through Soan River
and dug wells. Drinking water is arranged from Soan River and tube wells existing in the area and
for irrigation purposes, villagers mainly depend on Soan River, tube wells and rainwater.
Water samples were collected & analyzed for ascertaining the water quality status in the study
area during the period of post monsoon season in 2011, October
The quality of surface water has been ascertained from the chemical analysis results of water
samples collected from Soan River up & down streams. Quality of water upstream & downstream
of the mining area in the Soan river is almost similar. The total dissolved solids & hardness of
water are bit high which can be due to the geological formations & terrain characteristics. The
range of different chemical constituents in the surface water is given below in table 3.1.
38
FIGURE3.7- SURFACE AND GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING POINTS
Ground
water
Monitoring points
Surface
water Monitoring
points
39
TABLE NO.-3.1 SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS RESULTS
S.
No.
PARAMETER
River Soan
Up stream
River Soan
Down stream
1. pH Value 7.68 7.70
2. Temperature (Deg. 0C) 26 26
3. Turbidity 0.5 2.3
4. Total Dissolved Oxygen mg/l 8.9 8.7
5. Total Hardness (as CaCO3)mg/l 264 234
6. Total Alkalinity, mg/l 212 212
7. Chloride (as Cl), mg/l, Max. 21.2 19.6
8. Nitrate, mg/l, Max. 2.2 3.5
9. Iron (as Fe), mg/l, Max. 0.18 0.18
10. Flouride ND ND
11. Total Suspended Solids mg/l, Max. 52 54
12. Sulphate (as SO4) mg/l, max. 42 44
13. Oil & Grease, mg/l 0.5 0.5
14. Biochemical Oxygen Demand, mg/l
(3 days for 270 C)
2.0 2.4
15. Chemical Oxygen demand, mg/l 6.7 6.8
16. Copper (as Cu), mg/l BDL BDL
17. Zinc (as Zn), mg/l. Max. BDL BDL
18. Mercury (as 0.001 Hg) mg/l, Max. BDL BDL
19. Cadmium (as Cd) mg/l, Max. BDL BDL
20. Arsenic (as As), mg/l, max. BDL BDL
21. Cyanide (as CN) mg/l, Max. BDL BDL
22. Lead (as Pb) mg/l, Max. BDL BDL
23. Total Chromium (as Cr), mg/l BDL BDL
24. Selenium (as Se) mg/l, Max. BDL BDL
25. Boron, mg/l 0.09 0.09
26. Sodium mg/l 39.28 36.09
27. Total Coli Form Total Coli Form Nil
28. Faecal ColiForm Faecal ColiForm Nil
40
3.4.2 GROUND WATER QUALITY
Ground water results show that the pH, DO, BOD & COD values found well within the permissible
limit for drinking water (IS: 10500).
TABLE 3.2 GROUND WATER QUALITY
Sr No. Parameter Unit Ground
Water
Sample-I
Bore well
Andora Nichla
Ground
Water
Sample-II
Bore well
Kalruhi
1. pH Value - 7.28 7.84
2. Temperature (0C)
0C 27 28
3. Turbidity NTU 5.2 0.5
4. Chloride (as Cl) mg/l 13 15.1
5. Nitrate mg/l 1.0 0.8
6. Fluoride mg/l ND ND
7. Sodium mg/l 12.7 13.4
8. Total Nitrogen mg/l ND ND
9. Total Phosphorus mg/l ND 0.02
10. Sulphate (as SO4) mg/l 38 42
11. Biochemical Oxygen Demand,
(3 days for 270 C)
mg/l ND ND
12. Chemical Oxygen demand, mg/l 3 2
13. Copper (as Cu) mg/l 0.001 0.001
14. Zinc (as Zn) mg/l BDL BDL
15. Lead (as Pb) mg/l BDL BDL
16. Total Chromium (as Cr) mg/l BDL BDL
17. Dissolved Oxygen mg/l 7.3 7.9
41
3.5 CLIMATIC CONDITION
The Climate of the lease out area can be classified into following three categories
1. Winter
2. Summer
3. Rainy
The climatic information given below is based on the data obtained from the Meteorological data
being maintained by Deputy Commissioner‟s Office at Una
3.6 ATMOSPHERIC CONDITION
Atmospheric conditions include micro meteorological condition and ambient air quality of the
study area. Meteorological conditions with respect to wind velocity and direction in the study area
was determined by locating a monitoring station at the mine. The monitored data is supplemented
with meteorological data collected near mine site , the required data for interpretation of the
ambient air quality of the area was generated by establishing a monitoring network. Regular field
observations as per the MoEF and CPCB were taken from the established monitoring stations.
METEOROLOGY
Meteorology plays a vital role in affecting the dispersion of pollutants. Since meteorological
factors show wide fluctuations with time, meaningful interpretations can be drawn only from long
term reliable data. The source of such data is the Indian meteorological Department (IMD), which
maintains a network of meteorological stations at several important locations. The nearest station
is Una.
Meteorological information available for this station is temperature, humidity, rainfall, and wind
speed and direction.
Meteorological Data from Una (Tehsil H.Q.)
The data recorded at Una Station for the study period October 2011 to December 2011 are
summarized in table 3.3and table 3.4.
Climate of Leased out area,
District Una,
Himachal Pradesh
Climate Winter Summer Rainy
Period October to
Mid March
Mid-March-to
June.
July to September
Weather Cool Hot Humid
42
TABLE -3.3 MEAN TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY RECORDED
AT UNA )
Month
TEMPERATURE (0C)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
8: 00 AM
Mean
18.00 PM
Mean
8: 00 AM 18.00 PM
Max. Min. Max Min. Max. Min. Max. Min.
Oct
2011
31.5 26.9 28.7 23.2 13 17.5 71.4 66.42 63.2 53.2
Nov
2011
27.7 22.0 25.5 17.6 9.5 13.13 67.4 62.09 57.0 48.79
Dec
2011
24.6 4.2 11.2 24.7 4.1 11.3 63.0 48.2 54.2 44.3
3.6.1. Micro Meteorology at Site
Micro meteorology data viz. temperature and relative humidity were recorded at site during the
study period which are summarized in the table 3.3
TABLE 3.4 TEMPERATURE RECORDS AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY AT MINE SITE
Month Temperature
(0C)
Humidity (%)
Rainfall
in mm
No of
rainy
days
Prominent
wind
direction/wind
speed(Km./Hr.) Min. Max. Min. Max.
Oct 2011
10.8 31.9 51.9 71.5 171 2 NW/2.47
Nov 2011
6.4 28.0 59.1 71.5 0 0 NW/2.63
Dec 2011
0.2 26.4 60.2 72.8 54 4 NW/2.65
43
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
The ambient air quality around this study area could be affected by several sources viz. few small
neighboring sand, stone and bajari mine & Crusher plant , other industries in within 5 km radius
and transportation .To establish the ambient air quality the studies were carried out during October
to December 2011.
a. Ambient Air Sampling
Ambient air quality sampling was carried out with the help of High volume iar Sampler
and Respirable Dust sampler. The data generated for ambient air quality status within 5
km. radius of the proposed mine has been compiled along with micrometeorological
conditions for particular season.
b. Location of Ambient Air sampling Stations
Four sampling stations were established around the core zone within 5 km. radius to study
the present air quality. The locations are given in Table 3.4 and are marked in Fig ---3.
c. Sampling Schedule
24 hourly samples were collected from each station round the clock, twice a week for
continuous three months (Oct 2011 – Dec2011).
The sampling and testing of ambient air quality parameters were carried out as per relevant parts
of IS 5182. & NIOSH 7601 The detailed results of ambient air Quality are given in table 3.6 to 3.9
FIG- 3.8 LOCATION OF AMBIENT AIR MONITORING STATIONS
44
TABLE -3.6 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY (SPM 24-HR CONCENTRATION IN UG/CUM)
Station
Near Mine
Site
Kaloh Gagret Amb
Sample
No.
Date A1 A2 A3 A4
1. 3-4/10/2011 43.2 51.7 52.1 51.7
2. 6-7/10/2011 43.3 60.1 66.7 60.1
3. 10-11/10/2011 43.2 51.7 59.1 62.8
4. 13-14/10/2011 50.7 52.3 68.0 53.6
5. 17-18/10/2011 45.4 64.6 72.2 74.6
6. 20-21/10/2011 44.5 60.5 65.4 73.2
7. 24-25/10/2011 43.0 63.2 62.0 64.0
8. 27-28/10/2011 50.8 66.8 73.5 79.7
9. 1-2/11/2011 43.6 60.5 65.4 61.7
10. 4-5/11/2011 46.5 55.6 79.5 75.6
11. 7-8/11/2011 44.5 62.6 85.4 73.2
12. 11-12/11/2011 45.6 65.7 82.2 76.3
13. 14-15/11/2011 47.4 66.2 90.5 66.8
14. 18-19/11/2011 42.4 60.2 67.9 70.9
15. 21-22/11/2011 44.2 60.7 95.6 62.2
16. 25-26/11/2011 42.7 61.3 92.1 61.6
17. 4-5/12/2011 45.4 64.6 69.2 64.6
18. 7-8/12/2011 43.2 50.7 61.1 52.7
19. 11-12/12/2011 43.2 52.7 53.1 51.0
20. 14-15/12/2011 60.8 76.8 73.5 59.7
21. 18-19/12/2011 54.5 70.5 85.4 73.2
22. 21-22/12/2011 51.7 72.5 87.2 77.5
23 25-26/12/2011 53.6
71.3 99.0
72.1
24 28-29/12/2011 72.5
73.4 80.7
74.5
Minimum 43.2 51.7 50.1 51.7
Maximum 72.6 76.8 95.6 99.7
Average 47.7 62.3 69.8 69.7
25 Free silica
Content
3.9 4.5 4.2 3.6
45
TABLE -3.7 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY (RPM 24-HR CONCENTRATION IN UG/CUM)
Station
Near Mine
Site
Kaloh Gagret Amb
Sample
No.
Date A1 A2 A3 A4
1. 3-4/10/2011 26.2 23.5 27.4 26.4
2. 6-7/10/2011 30.1 26.7 33.3 30.1
3. 10-11/10/2011 31.7 29.1 33.2 32.8
4. 13-14/10/2011 28.3 42.8 30.7 30.6
5. 17-18/10/2011 34.6 36.5 35.4 34.6
6. 20-21/10/2011 30.5 28.4 34.5 33.2
7. 24-25/10/2011 33.2 28.3 34.0 34.0
8. 27-28/10/2011 36.8 34.8 40.8 39.7
9. 1-2/11/2011 40.6 29.2 42.8 42.0
10. 4-5/11/2011 35.6 25.4 36.5 35.6
11. 7-8/11/2011 35.6 22.0 28.4 24.3
12. 11-12/11/2011 24.3 33.5 28.3 21.2
13. 14-15/11/2011 21.2 29.2 44.8 42.0
14. 18-19/11/2011 32.0 27.7 32.5 30.9
15. 21-22/11/2011 30.9 28.8 24.5 22.0
16. 25-26/11/2011 22.0 28.9 32.7 31.3
17. 4-5/12/2011 34.6 39.2 45.4 44.6
18. 7-8/12/2011 20.5 25.4 24.5 29.2
19. 11-12/12/2011 23.2 32.0 23.0 27.7
20. 14-15/12/2011 36.8 33.5 30.8 28.8
21. 18-19/12/2011 34.5 35.4 34.5 28.9
22. 21-22/12/2011 32.5 37.2 41.7 39.2
23 25-26/12/2011 31.2 33.9 33.0 29.2
24 28-29/12/2011 33.4 30.9 31.5 24.3
Minimum 20.5 22.0 23.8 21.2
Maximum 40.6 42.8 45.4 44.6
Average 30.8 30.9 33.5 31.7
46
TABLE -3.8 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY (SOX 24-HR CONCENTRATION IN UG/CUM)
Station
Near Mine
Site
Kaloh Gagret Amb
Sample
No.
Date A1 A2 A3 A4
1. 3-4/10/2011 4.6 5.8 7.8 7.0
2. 6-7/10/2011 6.1 5.3 6.3 6.1
3. 10-11/10/2011 6.7 5.2 6.2 6.8
4. 13-14/10/2011 4.5 4.6 4.6 6.0
5. 17-18/10/2011 5.2 7.4 7.4 5.6
6. 20-21/10/2011 5.0 5.5 7.5 5.2
7. 24-25/10/2011 6.2 5.0 7.0 6.0
8. 27-28/10/2011 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7
9. 1-2/11/2011 5.5 6.6 6.6 6.7
10. 4-5/11/2011 5.6 6.5 6.5 5.6
11. 7-8/11/2011 4.6 4.5 6.5 5.2
12. 11-12/11/2011 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.3
13. 14-15/11/2011 4.9 5.0 5.0 4.9
14. 18-19/11/2011 6.2 5.4 5.4 6.9
15. 21-22/11/2011 6.7 6.2 6.2 6.2
16. 25-26/11/2011 5.0 6.7 6.7 6.6
17. 4-5/12/2011 6.6 6.4 6.4 5.6
18. 7-8/12/2011 5.5 6.5 6.5 6.2
19. 11-12/12/2011 4.2 5.0 5.0 5.0
20. 14-15/12/2011 6.8 5.3 5.3 6.7
21. 18-19/12/2011 6.5 5.5 5.5 6.2
22. 21-22/12/2011 6.5 5.7 5.7 6.5
23. 25-26/12/2011 7.3 7.0
7.6 5.1
24. 28-29/12/2011 5.0 6.0 5.4 6.5
Minimum 4.2 4.5 4.6 4.9
Maximum 7.3 7.4 7.8 7.0
Average 5.6 5.7 6.1 5.9
47
TABLE -3.10 Ambient Air quality (NOx 24-hr Concentration in ug/cum)
Station
Near
Mine Site
Kaloh Gagret Amb
Sample
No.
Date A1 A2 A3 A4
1. 3-4/10/2011 10.6 6.8 8.4 11.0
2. 6-7/10/2011 6.1 8.3 8.7 6.1
3. 10-11/10/2011 8.7 7.2 8.1 6.8
4. 13-14/10/2011 8.2 9.0 9.0 6.6
5. 17-18/10/2011 7.6 8.4 9.2 10.6
6. 20-21/10/2011 5.5 4.5 9.4 14.2
7. 24-25/10/2011 6.2 7.0 9.0 16.0
8. 27-28/10/2011 7.8 6.8 7.5 17.7
9. 1-2/11/2011 6.5 5.6 8.9 15.7
10. 4-5/11/2011 7.6 6.5 7.8 17.6
11. 7-8/11/2011 7.6 4.5 8.4 10.2
12. 11-12/11/2011 7.7 5.6 7.5 13.3
13. 14-15/11/2011 8..2 9.4 7.6 13.8
14. 18-19/11/2011 9.2 6.4 5.9 16.9
15. 21-22/11/2011 8.7 6.2 11.1 9.2
16. 25-26/11/2011 8.3 6.7 10.9 8.6
17. 4-5/12/2011 7.6 8.4 10.2 8.6
18. 7-8/12/2011 6.5 7.5 15.4 16.2
19. 11-12/12/2011 8.2 7.0 10.0 8.0
20. 14-15/12/2011 9.8 9.3 8.5 9.7
21. 18-19/12/2011 9.5 5.5 5.4 6.2
22. 21-22/12/2011 9.5 8.7 7.2 15.5
23. 25-26/12/2011 7.3 7.6 10.0
12.1
24. 28-29/12/2011 7.4 7.5
12.7
11.5
Minimum 5.5 4.5 5.4 6.1
Maximum 10. 9.4 15.4 17.7
Average 7.5 6.7 9.0 11.7
The observed range of various parameters recorded has been compared with the National Ambient
Quality Standards laid down by the Central Pollution Control Board and given in Table 3.11.
48
TABLE – 3.11 Comparison of Air Monitoring Results)
Parameters Near
Mine
Site
Kaloh Gagret Amb
NAAQS* Residential
& Rural
Use Ind. &
Mixed
Use
SPM Concentration
Minimum 43.2 51.7 50.1 51.7 500 200
Maximum 72.6 76.8 95.6 99.7
Average 47.7 62.3 69.8 69.7
RPM Concentration
Minimum 20.5 22.0 23.8 21.2 150 100
Maximum 40.6 42.8 45.4 44.6
Average 30.8 30.9 33.5 31.7
SO2 Concentration
Minimum 4.2 4.5 4.6 4.9 120 80
Maximum 7.3 7.4 7.8 7.0
Average 5.6 5.7 6.1 5.9
NOx Concentration
Minimum 5.5 4.5 5.4 6.1 120 80
Maximum 10. 9.4 15.4 17.7
Average 7.5 6.7 9.0 11.7
98%Tile
CO Concentration
The CO readings were less than 1 ppm for most part of the
sampling period.
5000
*NAAQS-National Ambient Air quality Standards.24-hr concentration in ug/m3.
A Perusal of tables3.10 shows that SPM, RPM, CO, NOx & SO2 are within limits prescribed for
areas meant for “Residential and Rural use”. The air quality in the proposed project area and its
surroundings is pollution free as there are no industries in the within 3 Km radius area and the
density of vehicular traffic is not alarming. The forests cover around the site is fairly dense and
serves as a carbon sink. All the pollutant gases in the atmosphere are also within safe limits. In
addition to this, there are plenty of water vapours in the air, acting as a diluting factor and do not
allow the dust to scatter much. The phenomenon like smog has never been observed in these
areas .
49
3.6.2 Wind Rose
Wind speed of a site plays a vital role in predicting the extent of air pollution. It gives a clear view
about the extent to which air pollutants are carried before they touch the ground. Wind rose
diagram for the month of October, November and December 2011 shows the direction of wind is
mostly in North Westerly direction. The average wind speed is under 3 Knots ,which shows that
the air pollutants fugitive in nature shall remain confided to surrounding areas , especially in north
westerly direction.
50
3.7 NOISE ENVIRONMENT
3.7.1 Noise Analysis within the study area
The noise analysis within the study area was recorded sound level meter. The analysis reveals that
the noise‟s well within the permissible range. The location of Noise level monitoring the levels
recorded is as stated in table 3.12
TABLE 3.12 NOISE LEVEL WITHIN THE STUDY AREA (Unit- dB)
S.
No.
Name Month Noise
level(Morning)
Noise
level(Night)
N1 Mine Site Oct 2011 45.8 38.4
Nov2011 43.5 41.6
Dec2011 49.5 43.8
N2 Village Andora
Nichla
Oct 2011 46.5 42.5
Nov2011 47.5 43.8
Dec2011 50.5 42.3
N3 Near State high way
25
Oct 2011 50.5 39.5
Nov2011 52.5 40.6
Dec2011 50.5 42.6
The results shows that the ambient air quality in the study area are well within the permissible
standards in respect of noise, which are 65, 55 and 50 dB (A) in daytime and 55, 45 and 40 during
night time for commercial, residential and silence zone respectively. The Noise levels are
51
slightly higher near state high way as compared to the other locations due to vehicular movement
in the area.
SEISMICITY
As per seismic zoning map of India (IS: 1893:2000), the proposed mining lease area falls
within Zone IV. The history of earthquakes in surrounding areas is given in table below.
TABLE 3.13THE EPICENTRES OF EARTHQUAKES OF DIFFERENT MAGNITUDES
Earthquake Date
Kashmir 30th May 1885
Kangra 4th April 1905 (M 8.0)
Great Pamir 21st April 1939
Chamba 10th July 1947 (M 6.2)
Kinnaur 19th January 1975 (M 6.8)
District Uttarkashi 20th October 1993 (M 6.6)
Chamoli 29th March, 1999 (M 6.8)
The project area lies between iso-seismals VII and VIII (Ressi-forel scale) of the Kangra
earthquake of 1905 and between iso-seismals V and VI (Modified Mercalli Scale) of the
Kinnaur earthquake of 1975. No damages have been reported in the project area.
3.7.2 Traffic density
Traffic density measurements were performed at two locations near village Andora Nichla and
near- State Highway .The Monitoring was performed in October, 2011. The results of
measurements are given in Table 3.14.
TABLE 3.14 TRAFFIC DENSITY
Traffic vehicle No. of vehicles per day near Mine
site at vill Andora Nichla.
Near State Highway
H.M.V.
10 85
L.M.V.
350 110
2/3 wheelers
100 1200
Grand Total
460 1395
52
3.8 SOIL
The soil in the area in general is quite shallow gravelly impregnated with weathered fragments of
parent rock and have developed under unique environment of natural forest vegetation. The soil
samples have been collected from two locations for assessment of soil quality in project area. The
results of sample analysed in given in table 3.15
TABLE – 3.15 SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSIS
S. No.
Parameters Unit S1 S2
1. Color Reddish Brown Reddish Brown
2. pH value 7.32 7.36
4. Soil texture - Sandy Clay Sandy Clay
5. Bulk density Gm/cm3 1.19 1.20
6. Conductivity Micro-mhos/cm 112 116
7. Permeability Cm/Hrs 4.6 4.2
8. Water Holding
Capacity
Inch/foot 0.86 0.84
9. Porosity % 39.2 39.6
10. Permeability Cm/Hrs 4.6 4.2
The result of soil samples analysed is presented in table 3.13 for physical and chemical
parameters. The result of soil analysis shows that it is almost neutral in nature having pH values
from 7.32 to 7.36. The soil texture varies from coarse sandy loam to clay loam having
predominantly Sand.
3.9 BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS
Plant and animal communities are indicators of the environment. The data collected from
department of forest on the terrestrial flora & fauna in the area are listed at annexure . The
aquatic life includes the major fish species Sal, Mahseer, Gid and Dol. found in river Swan.The river
being seasonal supports aquatic life during monsoon .
53
3.10 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
3.10.1 POPULATION AND LITERACY
Una District is having 758 habited villages/228 panchayats with a total population of about 5.21
lakh (according to 2011 census), where the majority i.e., 91.3 % of the population lives in rural
areas as compared to 8.7.4 % in urban areas. In this district cultivators constitute the majority of
the population. Industries are located in the region Una , Gagret, Amb and Mahetpur The sex
ratio of the district is 977:1000. The literacy rate of Una district is 87.23 % as compared to the
state, which is around 77.13 %. The major religion in the area is Hindu and Sikh.
There are 71 villages in the study area Amb tehsil having a total population of 143645 as per
2001 census forming 28843 households at an average of 5 persons per household. The total
break-up of household, population shows that there are 71235 male and 72410 female.
The breakup of population in villages surrounding Mining lease area is shown in graph below.
Male Female ratio is .
3.10.2 OCCUPATIONAL PATTERN The occupational pattern of the population of the rural area has been studied. About 55.05% of the
population is workers. Marginal workers are 42990 in numbers.
The cultivators and agricultural labourers are 4912 in numbers accounts for low percentage of
total main workers .
3.10.3 INDUSTRIES IN THE VICINITY
Una ,Mahetpur ,Gagret, Amb are main centre of industrial activity in the district.
Gagret has -Cold Store, Hotels, Printing, Activated Carbon Powder, Pharmaceutical Formulations,
Induction Furnaces, Metal Finishing, Lead acid Batteries, Lead smelters, Pulp industries,
Automobile servicing & Repair station.
Amb has Bandage, Concrete Blocks, Charcoal Batteries, Food processing, Hotel and Restaurants,
laboratories, Forest and Agriculture products, Printings, Pharmaceutical Formulations, Rosin &
Turpentine, Soap,, Calcium Carbide Induction Furnaces etc,
3.10.4 AMENITIES
The existing amenities in village of study area already given in previous para. The village in close
vicinity of the mine is well connected to Una which is the closest railway station at a distance of
about 50 km from the lease area. The nearest airport is Chandigarh Airport which is about 70
Km from Una. National highway connects Una to Chandigarh.
i Educational Facilities
In the study area, consisting of 71 villages as per census of 2001, the total numbers of educational
institutes in various categories are 137. Out of these 137 institutions there are 90 primary schools,
22 matriculations, 27 higher secondary school & 1 graduate college. There is no village without
a primary school. The mining lease area is located in village Andora Nichla which is about 14 Km
from Una town, which has facility of all levels of school and colleges.
54
ii. Health and Nutritional Status
The health status determines the nature and state of human resource development. On the other
hand several economic variables like income, employment, purchasing power and poverty
determine the health status of the people. Besides this, the health status is connected to the
hygienic conditions and nutritional status of the person concerned. The mortality due to illness is
very low as compare to deaths in road accident.
Proper medical aid facilities up to primary health care exists at village level. Well equipped
District level hospital is located at Una.
The staple food is chapatti made from Wheat and Maize flour and Rice. The Pulses and different
vegetables are other major food items. Availability of milk and milk products to the villagers is
fairly good due to large number of livestock in the area.
iii.Electricity
Electricity for all purpose is available in all village of study area.
iv. Drinking water
All the villages in the study area have water supply for domestic purposes. The source of water
supply in most of the village is spring water and dug well.
v. Transport
The main mode of transportation is by road. A network of both paved (Pucca) and unpaved
(Kuchcha) roads exist in the study area, Both are suitably interconnected.
All the villages in the study area have either kuchcha or pucca approach roads More than 50% of
the villages have pucca approach roads.
Private vehicles and private bus services share the major responsibility of the transport in the
study area. Numbers of buses, private and state govt. are operating on state highway.
vi. Place of Historical or Archaeological Interest
No place of Historical or archaeological importance exists in the core zone. The famous places
of Una are „Chintpurni‟ Goddess temple, Dera Baba Barbhag Singh, Dera Baba Rudru, Joggi
Panga, Dharamshala Mahanta, Dhunsar Mahadev Temple Talmehra, Shivbari Temple Gagret
3.10.5 ECONOMIC PROFILE
The economic aspect of the project is one of the most important part of assesment of welfare of
people. Besides some salaried jobs in government and private sector, small-scale business, non
wood forest products and agriculture activity contribute to the income of the people The per
capita income in the district is Rs 58493 as per 2011 census.
55
CHAPTER – IV
IDENTIFICATION OF IMPACTS
4.1 INTRODUCTION
Any human activity in any environment produces impact which may be beneficial or adverse.
Depending on the nature of activities and existing status, the impact analysis, the mitigating
action and future monitoring requirements are focused in the Environmental Management Plan
for minimizing adverse impacts.
Effects of mining and collection of sand, stone and bajari on each of the environmental
parameters are detailed below;
4.2 IMPACT ON LAND ENVIRONMENT
Topography
The lease is situated in the Soan River, a primary tributary of the Satluj River. The Soan(Swan)
River originates near Dharmsal village in Amb Tehsil of District Una at a height of about 986
Meter. The Soan catchment is divided into 52 sub catchments, generally forming drainage
network of tributaries. Its merges with Satluj River near village Ahilpur of tahsil Anandpur,
District Roper of Punjab, at 299 metres from MSL.
The highest point of the mining lease area is 450 meters above mean sea level and the lowest
point of the lease area is 449 meters above mean sea level within HFL of Soan River. The
project area is almost flat; the topography is not likely to change as the mined material shall get
replenished every year during monsoon.
Drainage
The Soan River, one of the important tributaries of the Satluj River, carries the main drainage of
the area Una district. The Soan generally has a south easterly flow. It has more tributaries on
the left bank side than on the right bank side indicating drainage pattern in the catchment is
controlled by geological structure. Harvesting of river bed material and other associated
activities may cause a few environmental degradations and the most serious ones anticipated are
detailed hereunder;
a) Damage of river bank due to access ramps to river bed, causing eyesore, damage to
the vegetation, soil erosion, micro disturbance to ground water,
b) Due to uneven alluvial bed of the river, availability of stone and sand bed thicknesses
vary considerably and harvesters are tempted to remove more stone and dig sand
from a pocket where thickness of sand is more and they cause ponding. In these
stagnant water biodegradable materials especially flora waste gets accumulated
causing contamination and inducing environment conducive for mosquito breeding.
56
c) Riverbanks are quite far from the mining site hence should not be affected. During
rainy season the flow of river is likely to get channelized.
d) Destruction of river bank hinterland and flora due to extraction of sand and stone by
creating approach road from riverbed.
e) Surface degradation due to road network.
f) Combination of at these activities results in offensive look
4.3. IMPACT ON WATER ENVIRONMENT
Damage in the water body, depends on its assimilative capacity. To find out assimilative
capacity of receiving water body, water samples were collected from different Bore Wells, and
surface water bodies. The study indicates that assimilative capacity of the River water bodies
still exists, but effective measures should be taken to check water pollution. Mining operation
shall be undertaken up to the depth of one meter, hence there shall not be noticeable effect on
surrounding ground water resources due to mining.
The stone, sand and bajari mining activity will not have any significant impact on the water
environment of the region.
4.4. IMPACT ON HYDROLOGICAL CONDITIONS
The study area itself being part of River Soan course carries surface as well as ground water
(under current). The flow of surface/ground water (sub surface flow) is following the trend of
topography, which is in the North-North-West to South southeast direction.
The area is part of dry river bed for more than nine months in a year except for the rainy season.
The sand and stone mining up to the depth of one metre will have insignificant impact on water
regime.
The ground water table which will be about one metres below the surface of river bed in the
mining area during the dry seasons will not be disturbed as ultimate working depth will be 449
mRL from upstream level and 448 mRL in the downstream boundary. Thus the mine operation
will not affect the hydrological conditions of the area. At the end of mining operations every
yearly season, the flood waters would replenish the mined material, thus it will be positive
impact on the ground water scenario in the subsequent mining period.
57
SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION OF SITE ELEVATION, WORKING DEPTH &
GROUND WATER
Proposed working will not intersect Ground water
4.5. IMPACTS ON CLIMATE
Temperature
The temperature pattern is a regional behaviour and is not likely to be affected by the mining
activity over a small area. Some local marginal effect may be perceived due to mining, and
creation of voids in the lease area.
Rainfall
The trend of rainfall, as studied and discussed in the last chapter forms a part of a regional
pattern, not dependent on the relatively small area of mining activity. The mining operation,
therefore, is not likely to have any adverse impacts on rainfall pattern.
Wind Speed
The wind speed in any area is dependent upon local topography and generation of elevation and
depression of pressure changes in the region. The controlling factors for the pressure changes lie
much beyond the control of small area under mining operations. Thus, no adverse impact on the
regional wind speed is anticipated due to the mining operations.
Humidity
The pattern of relative humidity depends mainly on the rainfall, wind, temperature and other
weather phenomenon that are regional in behaviour. The mining operation is not likely to have
any impact on the relative humidity in the surrounding.
TOP LEVEL
PRESENT DEPTH
ULTIMATE MINING DEPTH
STONE, SAND & BAJRI
WATER TABLE
450 mRL to 449 mRL
448.5 to 447.5 mRL (Pre monsoon)
449 to 448(1 m bgl) upstream
streamtostream
449 mRL to 44/8mRL(1 m bgl) down
stream
449 to 448 mRL (Post monsoon)
monsooon)
58
4.6. IMPACTS ON AIR ENVIRONMENT
As explained in the previous chapter, the ambient air quality monitoring results show that all the
parameters such as SPM, SO2,NOx and CO are within the limits prescribed by CPCB for
“Residential and Rural” areas.
The major contribution to pollution in air shall be from transportation of mined material to
stone crusher unit located at a distance of 8 Km. Impact due to transportation on receptor i.e.
nearby villages will be there.
The collection and loading & unloading will lead to momentary rise in the suspended
particulate matter (SPM). The dust liberated in mining and other related operations is injurious
to health if inhaled in sufficient quantity. The sand collection and lifting is a manual operation.
Therefore the dust generated is not so significant as compared to mining process of other hard
minerals like the process of drilling, blasting, mechanized loading etc. As such there will be no
noticeable impact on air quality.
4.7. IMPACTS ON NOISE AND VIBRATION ENVIRONMENT
The exposures to excessive noise levels can lead to:
Disturbed sleep, insomnia and fatigue.
Decrease in speech reception, communication, distraction and diminished
concentration thus adversely affecting the performance efficiency.
Irreparable cardiovascular, respiratory and neuralgic damages in certain extreme
cases.
The area in general represents calm surroundings. There is no heavy traffic, industry or noisy
habitation near the proposed leased mining area. As there will be no heavy earth moving
machinery there will not be any major impact on noise level due to proposed mining and other
associated activities. A detailed noise survey has been carried out and results were cross
referenced with standards and were found to be well within limits. Blasting technique shall not
be used for lifting of sand and stone, hence no possibility of land vibration. It was found that the
proposed mining activity will not have any significant impact on the noise environment of the
region. The only impact will be due to transportation of sand and stone by trucks to the stone
crushing unit located at distance of 8 Km. though village road/ State Road.
The noise levels for different transport equipment in this mine are given in Table 4.2
59
TABLE 4.2 NOISE GENERATED BY DIFFERENT MACHINERY
S. No. Equipment Noise level (dBA)
1. Tractor trolley 65-75
2. Trucks 65-80
The movement of trucks and tractor trolley through village road generating noise of 65-80 dBA
will result into momentary rise in noise level up to 40-50 dBA at receptor location i.e.
habitations in village during day time . These shall be well within the prescribed standards as
shown in the table below.
TABLE – 4.4.1 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARD IN RESPECT OF NOISE
Area code Category of Area Limits in dBA leq
Day time Night time
(A) Industrial area 75 70
(B) Commercial area 65 55
(C) Residential area 55 45
(D) Silence zone 50 40
With the resultant value being less than the prescribed ambient noise levels, there is no
likelihood of adverse impact of noise, from the transportation activity, on the surrounding
background noise level.
During mining operation ie collection of stone and loading into transporting vehicle noise levels
shall be higher but well within limit of the noise levels in the working area when compared
with standards prescribed by occupational safety and health administration (OSHA-USA) &
CPCB- New Delhi .
4.8 IMPACTS ON BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
The mining activity will have insignificant effect on the existing flora and fauna. Data have
been collected from various Government Departments such as forests, agriculture, fisheries,
animal husbandry and various offices to establish the pre project biological environmental
conditions. The project area is surrounded by reserved forests on the banks are also lined with
agricultural land. The purpose of the project itself is to save the flora around the project area
from river widening, excessive erosion and floods. It was found that the proposed mining
activity will not have any significant impact on the biological environment of the region.
60
The proposed mining activity is on the Soan riverbed. Since the river is mostly seasonal there
shall be significant impact on the aquatic flora and fauna downstream of the mining site due to
increase in suspended particulate matter, movement of vehicle, removal of sand, stone and
bajari shall disturb substratum.
4.9 IMPACTS DUE TO SOLID WASTE
During the excavation of stone, bajri and sand from the river bed silt and clay are also quarried
being associated minerals. The silt and clay which will be generated to the extent of 11000
metric tons per year will be left in the pits as back fill.
The silt and clay being the lightest of the sediment load in the flowing river water is carried
downstream by even the lightest floods during the onset of monsoons., Sand particles range in
diameter from 0.0625mm (or 1⁄16 mm, or 62.5 μm) to 2 mm. Particles smaller than sand fall in
the category of silt and clay. Silt and clay in the river water are derived mostly from erosion of
soil cover and weathered rocks and are generally suitable for agricultural field. As the silt and
clay do not contain any harmful constituents, therefore their carriage/movement further
downstream would not create any harmful environmental impact except increase in turbidity of
river water.
The generation of waste during five years of mining according to approved mining plan is as
given in the table 4.5 below:
TABLE 4.5 SHOWING GENERATION OF WASTE IN FIVE YEARS.
Year / Category Silt Clay Total
First Year 7400 3600 11000
Second Year 7400 3600 11000
Third Year 7400 3600 11000
Fourth Year 7400 3600 11000
Fifth Year 7400 3600 11000
Total 37000 18000 55000
4.10 IMPACTS ON SOIL
Practically, no soil cover is available on the mineralized zone. The conservation of top soil is
not required as it is not available in proposed mining area. The impact on soil in the lease area
will be negligible.
4.11 IMPACT OF CUMMULATIVE MINING IN SOAN RIVER
61
There are 4 of mining leases near proposed mining lease in the Soan river bed. The mining of
sand stone and Bajari is being carried out in accordance with the approved mining plan which is
prepared keeping in view the sustainability of river.
The quantum of sand, stone and bajari extracted is at present less than to the replenishment.
4.12 IMPACTS ON SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
4.12.1 HUMAN SETTLEMENT
The villages and their inhabitants in the buffer zone will not be disturbed from their
settlements due to the mining operations.
There is no inhabitation within the lease area being on riverbed. Therefore neither villages
nor any part of village or any hamlet will be disturbed during the entire life of the mine.
As the mining operations will not disturb or relocate any village or settlement, no adverse
impact is anticipated on any human settlement.
4.12.2 EMPLOYMENT
The area is considered as industrially backward. The population in general do not have
opportunities of earning from employment. The only occupation is to depend on is
agriculture, which is seasonal. In the absence of any high employment potential activities,
the people are economically backward. The mining operations shall be providing
employment 10-12 persons directly and to about 200 persons indirectly in the associated
activities like such as stone crushing, transportation followed by construction activities
etc. . Most of the local people are likely to be benefited. This project operation will
provide livelihood to the poorest section of the society
4.12.3 AGRICULTURE
The agricultural activities are seen in the areas where there is sufficient soil cover. The
buffer zone will remain undisturbed and no adverse impact is envisaged.
4.12.4 SENSITIVE TARGETS
There are no places of Tourist, religious & historical importance in core zone. The famous
places of Una are „Chintpurni‟ Goddess temple, Dera Baba Barbhag Singh, Dera Baba
Rudru, Joggi Panga, Dharamshala Mahanta, Dhunsar Mahadev Temple Talmehra,
Shivbari Temple Gagret The proposed mining activity is of very small magnitude;
therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated.
4.12.5 SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS
There are some people who are engaged in trading of stone, sand and bajri. Therefore due
to mining of these minerals the per capita income of local people has been improved.
62
The job/ business opportunities have improved the economic condition of the people.
They are in a position to utilize this money for purchase of tractors, trucks, jeeps, etc.
which may be put into use for business purposes. Part of money has also been utilized in
starting of some business as per person‟s skills.
The results of the field survey conducted based on a questionnaire prepared to understand
the knowledge and perception of the people living around the project area, gives a clear
idea about the need for the project. The awareness level regarding the proposed mining
activity is very high.
The proposed mining activity is expected to provide stimulus to socio-economic activities
in the region and thereby accelerate further development processes. However, there is an
apprehension that local people may get engaged in illegal activities if they are not
involved in the proposed mining operation or the project is shelved.
CONCLUSION
All possible environment aspects have been adequately assessed and necessary control
measures have been formulated to meet statutory requirements. Thus implementing this project
will not have any appreciable negative impacts.
63
CHAPTER –V
ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
5.1 MINING METHODOLOGY (See also Section-2.8): NOT APPLICABLE
This is river bed mining where the material will be lifted manually into truck-trolley. No new
technology is involved. The mining shall be done as per laid down procedures and given in
mining plan
5.2 LAND USE : NOT APPLICABLE
Acquisition of land is not involved
64
CHAPTER –VI
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
6.1 INTRODUCTION
The following monitoring programme is proposed for the project to undertaken on
commencement of mining activity. The monitoring of liked project i.e. Stone Crusher shall be
carried out as per the norms of State Pollution Control Board to meet the prescribed standards
under EPA. The unit shall be required to install the pollution control equipment as per
6.2 METHODOLOGY
The proponent shall follow the standard methods for quarterly monitoring various
environmental parameters i.e. Air Water and Soil. The deposition rate of mineral on river bed
shall also be monitored.
The estimated cost of EMP is given in Table 6.1
TABLE:6.1 EXPENDITURE ON TYPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES AS PER
MINING PLAN
S.No Title Capital Cost
Rs in Lakhs
Recurring Cost
Rs in Lakhs
1. Monitoring of Air, Water ,Soil,etc. - 1.50
2. Air Pollution Control- Management of
Haulage Roads including Sprinkling.
Establishment of Stone
Crusher
3.00
3. Plantation and check dams as per
Mining plan.
1.5 0.25
4. Disposal and spreading of Silt/clay as
per Mining Plan.
- 0.75
5. Occupational Health Measures
Provision of PPE and other
Miscellaneous expenditure.
0.5 0.1
6. Contribution to the area In terms of provision of
free building material to
schools, religious
buildings or other
activities in consultation
with Panchayat.
Total 2.0 5.60
65
CHAPTER –VII
ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
7.0 INTRODUCTION
The environment management plan has been developed with a view to bring down the levels of
impacts as discussed in the last chapter within limits. In each of the areas of impact, measures
have to be taken to reduce potentially significant adverse impacts and where these are beneficial
in nature, such impacts are to be enhanced/ augmented so that the overall adverse impacts are
reduced to as low level as possible. Measures to be taken for each of the impact areas are
detailed in the following paras:
7.1 LAND
Degradation of land is not a very significant adverse impact of riverbed mining due creation of
access roads, mining operations, transportation of mined material. In order to prevent the
environmental degradation of leased mine area and its surroundings, the following measures
shall be taken;
• No sand and stone will be collected from within 1/5 of the width of river or 5.0 m from
bank, especially from outer bank of the meandering river. Safe clearance should be
mainly determined by the width of the river bed.
• Creation of ponds and pits on the river bed shall not be allowed.
• Minimal damage to the flora standing on the river bank.
• Operations during daylight only.
• No foreign material should be allowed to remain/spill in river bed and catchment area, or
no pits/pockets will be allowed to be filled with such material,
• Stockpiling of harvested sand and stone on the river bed or river bank shall be avoided.
Movement of the vehicles on the road will be increased; however, non metalled road leading to
sand and stone mining area will be sprinkled with water at regular intervals. In addition to
prevent spillage by trucks/tractor trolley, over loading should be controlled along with speed
limit.
There will be minimum numbers of access roads to river bed, as cutting river banks should be
avoided and ramps are to be maintained. Access points to the river bed are to be decided based
on the following-
• Least steepness of river bank,
• Less damage to riverside vegetation and least human activity,
• Where steepness cannot be avoided access ramps should be constructed,
• Haulage roads parallel to the river bank and roads connecting access (ramps) to the river
bed shall be away from bank, preferably a minimum of l00m away,
66
• Access roads from the public roads and up to the river bank should be aligned in such a
way that it would cause least environmental damage,
• For particular operations approaching river bed from both the banks should be
avoided.
Plantation and Soil Conservation
There is no soil over mineralized area; however the receding floods in the monsoon season
deposit some clay /soil carried down by river water. It is hardly a few millimetres thick and of
not much consequence.
Even in the areas of no mining activity the process of deposition in one season and transportation
of previously deposited material in the next season takes place along with deposition of fresh
material by receding floods.
Soil Quality will be monitored on yearly basis in the area surrounding the core zone used for
agricultural activity to check for any negative impacts on the soil quality.
Plantation activity shall be undertaken in consultation with village Panchayat near the river
banks, village roadside or Panchayat waste lands to improve the land quality, aesthetics and
reduce soil erosion.
Post mining land use
As the mining lease area is part of active river course and suffer floods every monsoon season,
the land degradation impact due to the excavation of sand stone and bajari undertaken during dry
period of the year will get replenished by fresh material and there shall be not be any change in
land use pattern in core zone ie mining lease area.
In view of the above, the mining lease area would remain active river course during and post
mining operation.
7.2 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES
7.2.1 SURFACE WATER
The major source of surface water pollution due to sand mining is insignificant, however the
following measures shall be undertaken to prevent water pollution.
• Utmost care will be taken to minimize spillage of stone and sand.
• Drains and their Catchments will be constructed just beside the access roads so that the
storm water gels settled before flowing to the river.
• The washing of trucks and tractor trolleys in the river will be avoided.
• Plantation along the river banks will undertaken on degraded Panchayat waste land to
improve its quality and utility.
67
7.2.2 GROUND WATER
There would not be any adverse effect on the ground water quality. The mineral formation does
not contain any harmful element, which could percolate into the ground and pollute the ground
water. Hence, no control measures are required.
However, regular monitoring of quality in the existing hand pumps/tube wells in the vicinity
would be carried out both with reference to area and times intervals to study the hydrodynamics
of the strata.
7.3 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES
The proposed mining operations are not anticipated to raise the concentration of the pollutants
beyond prescribed limits. However, the following measures would be adopted to mitigate the
SPM levels in ambient air.
Dust particles generated during various mining activities when become airborne lead to increase
in SPM level in the ambient air. The major source of dust generation is the transport of material
by trucks and tractor trolleys. Adequate control measures shall be taken during mining operations
as well as transportation of minerals.
The following steps shall be adopted to prevent air pollution due to airborne dust.
• Green belts shall be developed on Panchayat land preferably on river bank.
• Dust mask provided to the workers engaged at dust generation points like excavations,
loading and unloading points.
• The only air pollution sources are the road transport network of the trucks. The
dust suppression measures like water spraying will be done on the roads.
• Utmost care will be taken to prevent spillage of sand and stone from the trucks.
• Overloading will be prevented. The trucks/ tractor trolley will be covered by tarpaulin
covers
• Plantation activities in consultation with village Panchayat along the roads will also
reduce the impact of dust in the nearby villages.
7.4 NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES
As there will be no heavy earth moving machinery there will not be any major impact on noise
level due to sand mining and other association activities a detailed noise survey has been carried
out and results were cross referenced with standards and were found to be well within limits.
Blasting technique is not used for sand and stone lifting, hence no possibility of land vibration. It
was found that the proposed mining activity will not have any significant impact on the noise
environment of the region. The only impact will be due to transportation of sand and stone by
trucks and tractor trolleys.
As the only impact is due to transportation of stone to the stone crushing unit and sand to the
market though village roads, the following control measures shall be taken to keep the ambient
noise levels well within limits:
68
Minimum use of horns and speed limit of 10 kms in the village area.
Timely maintenance of vehicles and their silencers to minimize vibration and
sound.
Phasing out of old and worn out trucks.
Provision of green belts in consultation with village panchayat along the road
networks.
Care will be taken to produce minimum sound during sand and stone loading.
7.5 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
The mining activity will have insignificant effect on the existing flora and fauna. Data have been
collected from various Government Departments such as forests, agriculture, fisheries, animal
husbandry and various offices to establish the pre project biological environmental conditions.
The project area is surrounded by reserved forests on the banks are also lined with agricultural
land. The purpose of the project itself is to save the flora around the project area from river
widening, excessive erosion and floods. It was found that the sand and stone mining activity will
not have any significant impact on the biological environment of the region. The aquatic flora &
fauna is also not likely to be affected as river is seasonal and supports life during monsoon when
mining activities shall not be undertaken.
Mitigation of Impacts on Biological Environment
There is a requirement to establish a stable ecosystem with both ecological and economic
returns. Minimization of soil erosion and dust pollution enhances the beauty of the core and the
buffer zone. To achieve this it is planned to increase plantation activities. The basic objectives of
plantations are as follows:-
• Improvement of Soil quality
• Quick vegetative cover to check soil erosion
• Improvement in river bank stability
• Conservation of biological diversity
• Provide forage and browse for wild life
7.6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
This project operation will provide livelihood to the poorest section of the society. The overall
impact of riverbed mining of sand stone and bajari on the social economics of the area shall be
a very positive one, as not only it will generate employment opportunities for local population
at mine site but also in associated activity i.e. at stone crushing plant , for transportation of mined
material, etc . It will also give a good boost to the general economy of the area.
About 12persons shall be employed at mine site and approximately 200 people are to be
benefited directly or indirectly by the project in the downstream activities.
69
Anticipated impacts and evaluation
The results of the field survey conducted based on a questionnaire prepared to
Understand the knowledge and perception of the people living around the project area, gives a
clear idea about the need for the project. The awareness level regarding the proposed mining
activity is very high.
The proposed mining activity is expected to provide stimulus to socio-economic activities in the
region and thereby accelerate further development processes. However, there is an apprehension
that local people may get engaged in illegal activities if they are not involved in the proposed
mining operation or the project is shelved or there is inordinate delay in its execution.
70
CHAPTER-VIII
ADDITIONAL STUDIES AND PROJECT BENEFITS
8.1 ADDITIONAL STUDIES
No additional studies are relevant with the nature of the project. The project is a category „B‟
project at S.No. 1(a) <50 ha ≥ 5 ha .of mining lease area in respect of non coal mine lease,
categorized as category A project due to applicability of general condition. i.e. within a distance
of 10 km from interstate boundary
The project is mining of sand, stone and bajari from river bed measuring 7-02-13 Hectare for
maximum mining of 74000 MT/annum. Total material handling every year shall be- 74000 MT
No blasting shall be done.
8.2 PROJECT BENEFITS
The project shall provide raw material for in infrastructure development, increase employment
opportunity and improve the socioeconomic condition of the area.
71
CHAPTER-IX
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
The project proponent agrees to provide free of cost boulders, bazri and sand for social projects
as Panchayat ghar, schools in the area.