114
Hindustan Construction Co Ltd

Suhas P Khedkar

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Suhas P Khedkar

Hindustan Construction Co Ltd

Page 2: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 2

Erecting Long Span Briges to suit Indian Conditions and Requirements

Presentation by

Suhas P Khedkar

(AVP- Engineering,) Hindustan Construction Company

To 3rd Annual Bridges India Summit 2012

On 17th May 2012

Page 3: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 3

Table of Contents

Different Methods of erection of Superstructure

Cast in Situ Construction

Comparison of Conventional and Cantilever Construction Method

Innovative Construction of III rd Godavari Railway Bridge at Rajamahendri

Bandra Worli Sea Link – Superstructure Construction entirely by Precast segmental Construction.

Segment Casting and Erection of Appraoch Spans

Specaial Challenge during Construction- Relocation of LG

Construction of Cable stayed bridge

Conclusions

Page 4: Suhas P Khedkar

Different Methods of Erection of Superstructure

Page 5: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 5

Different methods of Superstructure Erection

• Cast in situ construction

1. Conventional method for normal spans by use of staging

2. Using specialized technology for longer span bridges:

• e.g.. Use of centering girders,

• and bridge builders for cantilevering superstructures

• Construction using Precast elements

• Construction using precast girders of entire length,

• Construction using precast segments to be assembled during erection to form

girders of complete length

• Special techniques like Incremental launching method

Page 6: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 6

Different methods of Superstructure Erection

• Method of Erection of Superstructure is site specific. And also design specific.

• In fact design should suit the method of erection dictated by site conditions and other constraints

• Final Choice is to be made from cost considerations. Evaluation of a couple of alternatives is many times necessary for major projects to decide cost effectiveness.

Page 7: Suhas P Khedkar

Cast in Situ Construction

Page 8: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 8

Cast in Situ Construction for Superstructure

• Conventional casting on staging

• Method suitable for normal spans

1. More suitable for normal span viaducts as staging can be supported on ground

2. Has been used for both I girders and Box Girders.

3. If number of spans are small , use of precast girders and launching system is not cost effective

4. For box girders conventional casting can not be avoided as launching system may not be feasible due to excessive weight of span.

Page 9: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 9

Cast in Situ Construction for Superstructure

• Conventional casting on staging of long span superstructure is generally not feasible beyond about 50 m span due to

– excessive weight,

– Large quantity of staging and

– increased cycle time and concrete pour size.

– Especially difficult for River Bridges as staging needs to be supported on temporary piles.

Page 10: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 10

Cast in Situ Construction for Superstructure

• Cast in Situ Cantilever Segmental Technique

.

Page 11: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 11

Cast in Situ Construction for Superstructure

• Cast in Situ Cantilever Segmental Technique

Method suitable for long span box girders. Advantages as follows:

1. Each stage of construction is self supporting after completion. The erection system or the bridge builder can be erected on the tip of units cast earlier.

2. Construction is done in segments of convenient length, so that formwork and bridge builder frames supporting the formwork can be optimally

designed.

3. Construction progresses from pier in both directions towards centre of span. This allows maintaining feed lines for concrete and access for men

and material from the pier location up to the working point.

Page 12: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 12

Conventional Casting Vs Cantilever Construction

Comparison of two methods:

• Yamuna bridge at Naini Allahabad – 60 m spans Cast in Situ on Conventional staging

Elaborate staging arrangement needed for the span at 20 m from water level

• Bridge over River Brahmaputra at Tezpur

• Compare the small Bridge Builder on the tip of the cantilever with the staging of Naini Bridge

Page 13: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 13

Conventional Casting Vs Cantilever Construction

Yamuna Bridge Staging – Elevation and Side View

Page 14: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 14

Conventional Casting Vs Cantilever Construction

Tezpur Bridge Bridge Builder – Elevation and Side View

Page 15: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 15

Cast in Situ Cantilever Construction for Long Span River Bridges

Tezpur Bridge over River Brahmaputra – Different spans in different stages of construction

Page 16: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 16

Cast in Situ Cantilever Construction for Long Span River Bridges

Ganga Bridge at Varanasi - Bridge Builder in Elevation and Side View

Page 17: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 17

Cast in Situ Cantilever Construction for Long Span River Bridges

Ganga Bridge at Varanasi – after Completion

Page 18: Suhas P Khedkar

Innovative Construction for III Godavari Railway Bridge at Rajamahendri

Page 19: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 19

Innovative Construction for III Godavari Bridge Superstructure

III Godavari Railway Bridge

28 spans of 98 m each – 94 m C/C of bearings

Page 20: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 20

Innovative Construction for III Godavari Bridge Superstructure

• III Godavari Railway Bridge near Rajamahendri has been constructed using an innovative technique.

• The design itself was developed for the innovative erection technique, under typical constraints posed in the tender specifications.

• The foundations and substructure was designed to suit standard railway span of 94.0 m using steel girders.

• The tender for superstructure invited alternatives with prestressed concrete (PSC) superstructure.

• Challenge to design a PSC superstructure within the design capacity of the substructure and foundations, which were designed and constructed for the lighter loads of the steel superstructure.

• A bow string girder design was proposed by HCC.

Page 21: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 21

Innovative Construction for III Godavari Bridge Superstructure

Salient Features:

1. Structural System – Bow String Girder in Prestressed Concrete

2. Span of Girder: 94.0 m

3. Arches in Reinforced concrete Constructed using Cast in situ segmental technique

4. Suspenders in High tensile Steel – BBR Dyna hangars

5. Tie Girder in Prestressed Concrete – Box shaped

Page 22: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 22

Innovative Construction for III Godavari Bridge Superstructure

Innovative Features:

1. Top down Construction – Arch was constructed first

2. Tie girder constructed using formwork supported on suspenders

3. Arch was constructed using cast in situ cantilevering segmental technique in 7 stages

4. Arches from the two piers progressed to meet at the midspan, connected by a closure pour

Page 23: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 23

Innovative Construction for III Godavari Bridge Superstructure

Stages of Construction of Arch:

1. Erect central tower

2. Cast starting stubs

3. Erect formwork for typical segment supported by stay cables

4. Cast first segment

5. Repeat stages 3 and 4 for balance 6 segments

6. Erect formwork for closure pour on the last segment at crown

7. Cast closure pour

Page 24: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 24

Innovative Construction for III Godavari Bridge Superstructure

Stage 1 Cast starting stubs Stage 2 Erect Formwork for first

segment on starting stubs

Page 25: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 25

Innovative Construction for III Godavari Bridge Superstructure

Itermediate Stage: Formwork supported on completed arch ready to receive for concrete for the next segment

Page 26: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 26

Innovative Construction for III Godavari Bridge Superstructure

Itermediate Stage: Formwork supported on completed arch ready to receive for concrete for the next segment

Page 27: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 27

Innovative Construction for III Godavari Bridge Superstructure

Closure Pour: Formwork supported on the last segment of 1/2 arch

Page 28: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 28

Innovative Construction for III Godavari Bridge Superstructure

Arches for various spans completed

Page 29: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 29

Innovative Construction for III Godavari Bridge Superstructure

Construction of Tie Girder

Page 30: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 30

Innovative Construction for III Godavari Bridge Superstructure

Completed Bridge

Page 31: Suhas P Khedkar

Bandra Worli Sea Link Project Superstructure Construction entirely by Precast Segmental Technique, for both Cable Stayed and Approach Spans.

Page 32: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 32

Bandra Worli Sea Link Project – special Features • First Sea Link in India and with

Precast Segmental construction

• The entire sea link, including the cable stayed bridges has been constructed using precast segments for the superstructure.

Page 33: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 33

Bandra Worli Sea Link Project – special Features Many Firsts in our country

• First Cable Stayed Bridge across sea: India’s first open sea and longest cable stayed bridge.

• First Cable Stayed Bridge with a Single Central Pylon.

Page 34: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 34

Bandra Worli Sea Link Project – special Features Many Firsts in our country

• The entire sea link, including the cable stayed bridges has been constructed using precast segments for the superstructure. Total 2342 segments have been cast and used.

• The precast segments used for this sea link are one of the widest and heaviest in our country; - 18.1 m & 20 m in width , weight 120 to 140 MT

•Needing a very large casting yard with short line casting cells, large capacity gantries, matching capacity multi axle trailer for segment transportation, and specially designed gantries for segment erection.

Page 35: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 35

Special Features of the Project

Engagement of Asian Hercules, one of the largest floating shear leg crane in the world for shifting 1260 MT launching truss from Bandra end to Worli end of the main cable stay bridge

Up to 25-m high piers in open sea, giving ample headroom to marine traffic

Use of Politron Disc bearings for the first time in India

Piling through rocks exceeding 120 Mpa crushing strength

Use of Automatic Climbing Formwork for Pylon Construction

Page 36: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 36

Bandra Worli Sea Link Salient Design Features • Precast Segmental superstrucure except KAGK Link Bridge • Aesthetically pleasing deck profile, with uniform depth for all

bridges - Bandra approach , Bandra Cable Stayed, Worli Cable Stayed, Worli Approach.

• Unique Design of Bandra Cable Stayed - 250 m spans on either side , supported on a Central Pylon,

A1

P19

P19

A1 P17

16x50 = 800m

600mBANDRA CABLE STAY

4X50=200m(SPAN-BY-SPAN)

350mWORLI CABLE STAY

28X50 = 1400mPRECAST SEGMENTAL (SPAN-BY-SPAN)

P6 P12

500mPRECAST SEGMENTAL

(BALANCED CANTILEVER) 150mPRECAST SEGMENTAL

(FORWARD CANTILEVER)

PRECAST SEGMENTAL

BANDRA CABLE STAY600m

WORLI CABLE STAY350m

NORTH 800m

NORTH APPROACH BRIDGE SOUTH APPROACH BRIDGE

BANDRA

WORLI

APPROACH ROAD

546m

APPROACHBRIDGE

& TOLL PLAZABANDRA

WORLI

200mSOUTH APPROACH BRIDGE

1400m

LIN

K BR

IDG

E81

1m

(SPAN-BY-SPAN)

Page 37: Suhas P Khedkar

Bandra Worli Sea Link Project Segment Casting and Erection

Page 38: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 38

Casting Yard and Erection Gantry at BWSLP The project needed a very large casting yard, and two specially designed LGs, which needed to to be supplemented by one more LG from Worli end in the last season.

Page 39: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 39

Advantages of Precast Superstructure Vs Cast in Situ

• Construction of Superstructure in parallel with Foundation construction.

• When Foundations are being constructed at various site locations, superstructure elements can be precast in a separate casting facility.

• Advantages of factory production, with ease in quality control, and dimensional accuracy, due to easy acces, and dedictaed equipment, and survey stations.

• Good quality control due to planned facilities like proper curing arrangement, dedicated supervision.

• The above are relatively much difficult at actual site locations due to difficult access, great heights and different locations.

Page 40: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 40

Principles of Precast Segmental Construction

• Span is divided into a number of segments of full deck width

• The segments are match cast to attain the final geometry as of the erected span.

• Match casting and geometric control are of great importance as the bridge is virtually built in the casting yard. Any error in match casting will be difficult to correct during erection, as the span will not fit on the piers.

• Precision Survey in casting yard to attain desired geometry

• Precast Segmental Construction offers use of industrialized, repetitive construction procedures, which contribute to improved quality control as well as reduction in construction time .

Page 41: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 41

Importance of Precision in Precast Segmental Construction

• Span is divided into a number of segments which are match cast to attain the final geometry as of the erected span.

• The bridge is virtually built in the casting yard. Any error in match casting will be difficult to correct during erection, as the span will not fit on the piers.

• The bridge has both vertical gradient, and Horizontal curvature.

• The bridge deck therefore follows a space curve.

Page 42: Suhas P Khedkar

Precast Segmental Construction for Bandra Worli Sea Link Project, Mumbai – CEMCON 2007

February, 23 - 2007 Page 42

SEGMENT : MATCH CASTING

Page 43: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 43

Planning and Management for Casting Yard

(LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION)TYPICAL CROSS SECTION AT SEGMENT STORAGE AREA

(TRANSVERSE DIRECTION)TYPICAL CROSS SECTION AT CASTING CELL AND STORAGE AREA

(STORAGE BAY 1) (STORAGE BAY 2)

(REBAR JIGS)

CASTING YARD & STACKING YARD CROSS-SECTION

(CASTING CELL)

Page 44: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 44

Precasting Yard at BWSLP- Capacity to stack 400 segments. And 9 casting cells.

Page 45: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 45

Prefab Reinforcement Cage handling

Page 46: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 46

Match casting at Precasting Yard

Page 47: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 47

Precast Segment Pour Sequence

3.17 CUM

1.26 CUM

1.26 CUM

2.52 CUM2.19 CUM2.69 CUM4.28 CUM

1.66 CUM

1.66 CUM

7 89

2.52 CUM 2.19 CUM 2.69 CUM

2

3

45

3.17 CUM

1.26 CUM

1.26 CUM 1.66 CUM

1.66 CUM6

CONCRETE PLACING SEQUENCETOTAL CONCRETE QUANTITY = 44.30 CUM

12a

3a

4a 5a

6a

7a8a 9a10

5.33 CUM

Page 48: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 48

Segment Handling at Precast Yard

Page 49: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 49

Segment Transportation on Special Trailer

Page 50: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 50

Main Truss

Front Leg

Suspension Frames

Rear Leg

Rear Pylon

Front Pylon

Center Leg

Connection Beam

Rear Trolley

Front Trolley

Launching Girder at BWSLP

Page 51: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 51

Segment Transportation in Sea on Barge

Page 52: Suhas P Khedkar

Main Challenge During Construction of Approach Span: Relocation of LG from Bandra Approach spans beyond Bandra Cable Stayed bridge: Shifting by 500 m in the sea.

Page 53: Suhas P Khedkar

Text (Font Arial 16, Color Black, Line Spacing 30 points).

Text (Font Arial 16, Color Black, Line Spacing 30 points).

Page 54: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 54

Text (Font Arial 16, Color Black, Line Spacing 30 points).

Text (Font Arial 16, Color Black, Line Spacing 30 points).

Need for Relocation

Page 55: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 55

Text (Font Arial 16, Color Black, Line Spacing 30 points).

Text (Font Arial 16, Color Black, Line Spacing 30 points).

Relocation of Launching Trusses using 1600 MT capacity Barge Mounted Crane – Asian Hercules

Page 56: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 56

Relocation of Launching Trusses using 1600 MT capacity Barge Mounted Crane – Asian Hercules

Page 57: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 57

Relocation of Launching Trusses using 1600 MT capacity Barge Mounted Crane – Asian Hercules

Entire LG weighing 1260 MT , of length 105 m was physically lifted and shifted from P17-P18 to P20-P21

Page 58: Suhas P Khedkar

Construction of Cable Stayed bridge

Page 59: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 59

Need for detailed Construction Stage Analysis

Page 60: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 60

Results of stage-by-stage Analysis

Stage-by-Stage Analysis

Tower Construction Deck Erection

Precamber Values Fibre Stresses

Strutting Requirements and Force Levels Casting Curve, Erection Curve and Control Lines

Stay Cable Forces for Installation, Tensioning and fine tuning Forces

Stage Deformations

Temporary PT

Page 61: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 61

Casting Curve

Page 62: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 62

Stage by Stage Deck Camber Curves Deck Camber Curves for Bandra Bridge Stage by Stage

-100-90-80-70-60-50-40-30-20-10

0102030405060708090

100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450

-300

-275

-250

-225

-200

-175

-150

-125

-100 -7

5

-50

-25 0 25 50 75 100

125

150

175

200

225

250

275

300

Chainage x [m]

Ele

vatio

n y

[mm

]

Page 63: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 63

66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Segment Node No. 5090 Segment Node No. 5113

1

76

543

2

424140393837363534333231

3029

282726252423

2221

2019

1817

161514

131211

109

S8

S9

S10

S11

S12

S13

S14

S15

S16

S17

S18

S19

S20

S21

S22

S23

S24

S25

S26

S27

S28

S29

S30

S31

S32

S33 S33

S7

Stage Deflections

-80

-30

20

70

120

170

220

270

320

370

420

-300 -294 -288 -282 -276 -270 -264 -258 -252 -246 -240 -234 -228 -222 -216 -210 -204 -198 -192 -186 -180 -174 -168 -162 -156 -150 -144 -138 -132 -126 -120 -114 -108 -102 -96 -90 -84 -78 -72 -66 -60 -54 -48 -42 -36 -30 -24 -18 -12 -6 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42

Deformation at previous stage Deformation after completion of this stage : LC1190 Deformation at handover for traff ic movement (Design Camber) @ T=0 : LC1298

Lift Non-stay Segment

Page 64: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 64

66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Segment Node No. 5090 Segment Node No. 5113

1

76

543

2

424140393837363534333231

3029

282726252423

2221

2019

1817

161514

131211

109

S7

S8

S9

S10

S11

S12

S13

S14

S15

S16

S17

S18

S19

S20

S21

S22

S23

S24

S25

S26

S27

S28

S29

S30

S31

S32

S33 S33

Stage Deflections

-80

-30

20

70

120

170

220

270

320

370

420

-300 -294 -288 -282 -276 -270 -264 -258 -252 -246 -240 -234 -228 -222 -216 -210 -204 -198 -192 -186 -180 -174 -168 -162 -156 -150 -144 -138 -132 -126 -120 -114 -108 -102 -96 -90 -84 -78 -72 -66 -60 -54 -48 -42 -36 -30 -24 -18 -12 -6 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42

Deformation at previous stage Deformation after completion of this stage : LC1191 Deformation at handover for traff ic movement (Design Camber) @ T=0 : LC1298

Stress Previous Cable to Ft

Page 65: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 65

67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Segment Node No. 5090 Segment Node No. 5113

1

76

543

2

424140393837363534333231

3029

282726252423

2221

2019

1817

161514

131211

109

S7

S8

S9

S10

S11

S12

S13

S14

S15

S16

S17

S18

S19

S20

S21

S22

S23

S24

S25

S26

S27

S28

S29

S30

S31

S32

S33 S33

Stage Deflections Lift Stay Segment

-80

-30

20

70

120

170

220

270

320

370

420

-300 -294 -288 -282 -276 -270 -264 -258 -252 -246 -240 -234 -228 -222 -216 -210 -204 -198 -192 -186 -180 -174 -168 -162 -156 -150 -144 -138 -132 -126 -120 -114 -108 -102 -96 -90 -84 -78 -72 -66 -60 -54 -48 -42 -36 -30 -24 -18 -12 -6 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42

Deformation at previous stage Deformation after completion of this stage : LC1192 Deformation at handover for traff ic movement (Design Camber) @ T=0 : LC1298

Page 66: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 66

Stage Deflections Install Cable and stress to Fi

67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Segment Node No. 5090 Segment Node No. 5113

1

76

543

2

424140393837363534333231

3029

282726252423

2221

2019

1817

161514

131211

109

S6

S7

S8

S9

S10

S11

S12

S13

S14

S15

S16

S17

S18

S19

S20

S21

S22

S23

S24

S25

S26

S27

S28

S29

S30

S31

S32

S33 S33

-80

-30

20

70

120

170

220

270

320

370

420

-300 -294 -288 -282 -276 -270 -264 -258 -252 -246 -240 -234 -228 -222 -216 -210 -204 -198 -192 -186 -180 -174 -168 -162 -156 -150 -144 -138 -132 -126 -120 -114 -108 -102 -96 -90 -84 -78 -72 -66 -60 -54 -48 -42 -36 -30 -24 -18 -12 -6 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42

Deformation at previous stage Deformation after completion of this stage : LC1194 Deformation at handover for traff ic movement (Design Camber) @ T=0 : LC1298

Page 67: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 67

Erection Monitoring

Page 68: Suhas P Khedkar

P19 tower Pilecap

Page 69: Suhas P Khedkar

Tower Leg Construction in Progress

Page 70: Suhas P Khedkar

Isometric View of Piertable

Page 71: Suhas P Khedkar

Piertable Truss Erection

Page 72: Suhas P Khedkar

Pier table Truss Erection

Page 73: Suhas P Khedkar

Lifting Frame Operations

Page 74: Suhas P Khedkar

Lifting Frame Operations

Page 75: Suhas P Khedkar

Segment Transportation on Barge

Page 76: Suhas P Khedkar

Piertable Segment Lifting with Lifting Frame

Page 77: Suhas P Khedkar

Pier Table Segment Alignment

Page 78: Suhas P Khedkar

Segment Supported on Pier Table Truss

Page 79: Suhas P Khedkar

Pier Table Segments Alignment in Progress

Page 80: Suhas P Khedkar

Diaphragm Concreting

Page 81: Suhas P Khedkar

Isometric view of Middle Tower Legs

Page 82: Suhas P Khedkar

Construction of Middle Tower with ACS

Page 83: Suhas P Khedkar

Construction of Middle Tower with ACS

Page 84: Suhas P Khedkar

Construction of Middle Tower with ACS

Page 85: Suhas P Khedkar

Construction of Middle Tower with ACS

Page 86: Suhas P Khedkar

Construction of Middle Tower with ACS

Page 87: Suhas P Khedkar

Construction of Middle Tower with ACS

Page 88: Suhas P Khedkar

Construction of Middle Tower with ACS

Page 89: Suhas P Khedkar

Construction of Middle Tower with ACS

Page 90: Suhas P Khedkar

Construction of Middle Tower with ACS

Page 91: Suhas P Khedkar

Construction of Middle Tower with ACS

Page 92: Suhas P Khedkar

P19 Middle tower leg in Progress

Page 93: Suhas P Khedkar

P19 Middle tower leg in Progress

Page 94: Suhas P Khedkar

P19 Middle tower leg in Progress

Page 95: Suhas P Khedkar

Strutting at Junction Top

Page 96: Suhas P Khedkar

Strutting at Junction Top

Page 97: Suhas P Khedkar

Assembly of tower head formwork prototype

Page 98: Suhas P Khedkar

Alignment of Anchorage Boxes at 100m above MSL

Page 99: Suhas P Khedkar

Construction of Tower Head

Page 100: Suhas P Khedkar

Erection of Deck

Page 101: Suhas P Khedkar

Erection of Deck

Page 102: Suhas P Khedkar

Erection of Parallel Wire Stay Cables

Page 103: Suhas P Khedkar

Erection of Parallel Wire Stay Cables

Page 104: Suhas P Khedkar

Erection of Parallel Wire Stay Cables

Page 105: Suhas P Khedkar

Erection of Precast Segmental Deck

Page 106: Suhas P Khedkar

Erection of Precast Segmental Deck

Page 107: Suhas P Khedkar

Erection of Precast Segmental Deck – Deck Closure

Page 108: Suhas P Khedkar

Erection of Precast Segmental Deck

Page 109: Suhas P Khedkar

Erection of Precast Segmental Deck

Page 110: Suhas P Khedkar

Erection of Precast Segmental Deck

Page 111: Suhas P Khedkar

Completed View of Bandra CSB

Page 112: Suhas P Khedkar

28 May 2012 Presetation to 3rd annual Bridges India Summit 2012 112

Conclusions

• Indian Engineers are Well Experienced in Construction of loang Span Bridges, and Erection of Bridge Decks, using various methods

• Choice of the method is Site Specific and Design Specific • Bridge Design should Suit Erection Method

Page 113: Suhas P Khedkar

I acknowledge with Thanks opportunity given to me for presentation of a very important and interesting topic. I thank the organizers, and the audience.

Page 114: Suhas P Khedkar

Disclaimer

This presentation contains certain forward looking statements concerning future business prospects and profitability of HCC, which are subject to a

number of risks and uncertainties and actual results could materially differ from those in such forward looking statements, important developments

that could affect the company's operations include a downtrend in the infrastructure sector, significant changes in political and economic

environment in India, tax laws, labor relations, litigation etc. The company does not undertake to make any announcement in case any of these

forward looking statements become materially incorrect in future or update any forward looking statements made from time to time by or on behalf

of the company.