Summary 77 Pages

7/31/2019 Summary 77 Pages.

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/summary-77-pages 1/82

Page 1 of 82

1

1



Page 2 of 82

2

2



Page 3 of 82

3

3



Page 4 of 82

4

4



Page 5 of 82

(For The Definition Of -N-See The Prolificsy Principle Page---).

5

5



Page 6 of 82

6

6



Page 7 of 82

7

7



Page 8 of 82

8

8



Page 9 of 82

9

9



Page 10 of 82

10

10



Page 11 of 82

Again this is very lengthy and complex subject !Involves deriving

relationship between Planck’s constant (h)?My own universal

constant (H).However this correlation will become more apparent as

we read on !But basically according to Microscopic Quantum

Mechanics:

( Pauli Exclusion Principle ):

11

11



Page 12 of 82

(No Two Same Particles Can Exist At The Same State.)

The analogue of this in My Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics

(No Two Same Life Forms Can Exist in The Same State)

Now we need to define what we mean by this life form First it’s

function of each element in the chemical table Then a function of

the physical distances between themselves if they ever were allowed

to exist simultaneously Plus the universal constant (H)must be taken

to account and many other factors too long to even to list let alone

expatiate here.

.

1-

The Maximum possible age of life as we know it on our planet is

determined by the Already Known Time Sealing of our sun when it

will turn in to Red Giant enveloping the earth.

12

12



Page 13 of 82

2-

The Inverse Of The Distance calculated above of the nearest object

containing life recognisable by the inhabitant of planet earth at the

time is of the orders of Atomic Dimensions e.g. the Angstrom!.

13

13



Page 14 of 82

(See Page---The Inevitability Of Nuclear War.)

14

14



Page 15 of 82

15

15



Page 16 of 82

16

16



Page 17 of 82

17

17



Page 18 of 82

Four:.

18

18



Page 19 of 82

19

19



Page 20 of 82

v=c

v=c

V=0.

20

20



Page 21 of 82

21

21



Page 22 of 82

22

22



Page 23 of 82

23

23



Page 24 of 82

24

24



Page 25 of 82

25

25



Page 26 of 82

26

26



Page 27 of 82

27

27



Page 28 of 82

28

28



Page 29 of 82

29

29



Page 30 of 82

30

30



Page 31 of 82

31

31



Page 32 of 82

32

32



Page 33 of 82

33

33



Page 34 of 82

34

34



Page 35 of 82

35

35



Page 36 of 82

36

36



Page 37 of 82

37

37



Page 38 of 82

38

38



Page 39 of 82

θ +V Cos θ.

Replace Sin θ=t1 Cos θ = t2 (t1 and t2 Both are time in

Millisecond.)

t1 t2

39

39



Page 40 of 82

Ω

40

40



Page 41 of 82

θ n CD

41

41



Page 42 of 82

n CD

42

42



Page 43 of 82

1-They are what is behind attraction never repulsion.

43

43



Page 44 of 82

2-Could be cut at certain frequencies.

3-The frequency is decided by the following definition:

Frequency =the difference between the speed at which these

Geogravs lines are cut and the speed at which they glued

back together again (.

i.e.

.

44

44



Page 45 of 82

45

45



Page 46 of 82

If we place two magnets of different polarity and of simple

Geometrical Configuration i.e. calculable Moments Of Inertia

and known Natural Frequency not horizontally but one on top of

each other.

One is floored (fixed to the ground) The other is suspended from

a Weighing Machine .

When a rotor (a coil) is placed between the two then current will

flow. The entire apparatus is placed inside vacuum as pure as

possible vacuum.At certain speed of the rotor electric current will flow .

As the coil start to cut the cosmic flux with certain frequency

approaching that of the Natural Frequency of the magnets.

Levitation should be detected .

The magnet should begin to lose weight as it will be indicated by

the weighing machine. Or better still detected by extra sensitive

stress or strain gauges?

Or even by one of the many other devices (e.g. lasers) that are soaccurate these days they will be able to discount any Noise in this

experiments(e.g. Torque? Vibrations??etc)to the order of :

Micro- Grams or even much less !

46

46



Page 47 of 82

Whatever instruments are deployed they need to be with

sensitivity much higher in order of magnitude than those

employed by Seismography.

Since the rotor will be cutting not only The Magnetic Flux

between the two magnets but in addition to that and at certain

speed the Cosmic Flux. Therefore causing the upper magnet to

displace its equal volume of the Cosmic Flux.

The Isamic Diagrams (Part one ).

47

47



Page 48 of 82

θ n CD

48

48



Page 49 of 82

What have been said so far is Deeply Rooted in Quantum

Mechanics and the Prolificacy Principle introduced in Chapter

Eighteen. i.e.:

When one of the “m” changed to “n” by the operators

(See Page---The Graph).

49

49



Page 50 of 82

50

50



Page 51 of 82

Unitary Thermal Unit

Unit charge

(h is Planck’s Constant ?H is my own universal

Constant. See later for calculations)

51

51



Page 52 of 82

52

52



Page 53 of 82

53

53



Page 54 of 82

54

54



Page 55 of 82

(See Page—The Cosmic Flux) ?

55

55



Page 56 of 82

Repeating the above procedure but instead of multiplying the

area ( a2) Of the side square by the diagonal going through the

centre of gravity of this Square ?We now multiply this area by

the diagonal going through the centre of the Cube itself ?? To

obtain the volumes from these cubes by repeating the same

steps as in part-one?

This graph is left as an exercise for the reader by calculating :

Vo = √3 . a3 Deformed to cube of sides (31/6 . a)

V1 = 31/6 +1/6+1/2+1/6.a3 Deformed to cube of sides (31/3 .a)

V2 31/3+1/3+1/2+1/3 .a3Deformed to cube of sides (31/2 .a)

And so forth? What does Graph Two going to look like??

56

56



Page 57 of 82

The area of cross section of a sphere radius -r- is (∏ r2 ).

Construct the volume :

V1 (a Cylinder )By (∏ r2 ).r.= (∏ r3 ).

Deform this volume in to another volume of Any Shape but of

the new dimension (R 1 ) = (∏ r3 )1/3 = ∏1/3 r

V2 = ∏ (R 1 )2 R 1 =∏ (R 1 )3 =∏2 . r3

V3 =∏2 . r3 ….etc ?

Giving:

Vn = ∏n X r3

57

57



Page 58 of 82

R i,j,k…

R i,j,k… )2 R i,j,k…

58

58



Page 59 of 82

Let:

The star ( * )Denoting the Number of population or their Energy

After the revolution.

59

59



Page 60 of 82

This theorem constructed upon Two Premises And by the

Imaginary Potential Wall (W)drawn earlier separating the State

Of Affairs before and after the revolution. We have :

a-

Everyone should agree that if this Potential Wall represented a

war or revolution then there will be Reduction In The State !

(In this case its the number of the population).

b-

Most historians will agree that revolutions almost always are

followed by Surge of energy !It energizes the masses !! And

there are Myriads Of Reasons behind this surge ?Some

mathematical i.e. the law of conservation of energy

60

60



Page 61 of 82

(Compensating for the reduction in the population )?Others

Psychosomatic where the masses behave like a genie released

from its bottle! etc. Therefore:

(

(See Page---The Science Of Separation.).

Also :

61

61





Page 63 of 82

63

63



Page 64 of 82

64

64



Page 65 of 82

.

Where:

D=Destructivity per unit time. P=The period it lasts. Not the time it

may take (T) Where P =1/T.

65

65



Page 66 of 82

Let us now Plug In some figures in to this equation that have

appeared in various forms in this book and see what happens?

We know for certain that the Nazis only lasted six years therefore

P 1=6. We also know they murdered about :

[Six Million Jews +Four Million Slavs]. Therefore. D1= 6+4

substituting for D1/ P1 =[ 6+4]/6 =1.7 approx?

We also know that British colonialism been current for the past one

hundred and fifty years i.e. P 2 ≈ 150 Years.

Hence [6+4]/6=1.7 =D2 /(150.) This gives:

D 2=The number of people murdered by the British= 170 Millions. At

the very least. ! !

This should surprise no one because it tally very well with our

concrete knowledge of today e.g. according to official figures

released by the Colonialists Own Institutions Themselves :

The number of Iraqis killed just in the few years 2003-20009 have

passed the one Million And Half Mark and if you have the stomach

66

66



Page 67 of 82

for more see a report by the London news paper (The Independent )-

1st /January/2010. How the British army used “Secret Squads “to

abuse Iraqis including the raping of women children and even the

animals!

(See The Baby Killers On Page----)

Keeping in mind that Iraq is just one of the many Small Populated

countries visited by the British. Needless to say how this proves the

British to be much more atrocious than the Nazis ever were? Just like

what that journalist has discovered

To his disbelieve from direct experience that the British are

hundred times more evil than the Nazis have ever been? (See

Page---).Only that the British have reached the state of the art in

covering up their crimes against mankind(just sneakier and slower

with it ) that is all!(see the London Cage-in the first pages of this

book)?ALTERNATIVELY if we to conduct some Unbiased research

67

67



Page 68 of 82

in to history to determine how many people exactly (to the nearest

million)the British have murdered so far? And substitute this number

in to the equation above we can predict with some precision the date

of the final demise of British colonialism? ? ?(i.e. when the Brits will

blow up and bust their own ratio???) WARNING

For proper calculations we need to insert the values of the BUVO

and EUVO.(see earlier)?Also those of the relative densities (not

totals )of the populations of the two nations in comparison. However

this will not alter the order of magnitude of the result dramatically !

68

68



Page 69 of 82

If you happened not to like equations just do simple totals?

The number of people the British killed in India alone was officially

recognised to be fifty five millions ! ? ! Not to mention Miscellaneous

like Iraq (Pop-17 millions)lost one million and many more

dislocated! Palestine (pop-one million) lost half million and much

more dislocated forever, And the list believe you me is endless from

Sudan to Afghanistan. Now clear your conscience? Come clean?

And ask yourself Can the Nazis ever mach these figures? ! ? And

figures do not lie.

69

69



Page 70 of 82

.

.

1-it means destructivity is constant.

2-all parties plugged in to the equation will strive to satisfy the

constant numerically i.e. the colonialists will not rest? Cannot rest

until they kill same as the Nazis!Same as the Stalinists etc! i.e. there

is an involuntary mechanism .

3-Germans just do not have the stomach as the British to maintain

such atrocities in Long Protracting Cool Calculated Callous

70

70



Page 71 of 82

Fashion Never Ending Agonies in time of peace! (see page on the

three C`s).

It’s just not in the German character and outside their abilities to

sustain a British-like campaigns of venom forever.

4-Hence the only real difference is the timing ?The period these

atrocities against humanity take ?That is all.ie;

Again scientifically speaking the British practice “things” like mass

killing in Times Of Peace(e.g. that of overseas students) to make up

for what the Nazis practiced in the Short Years Of The War .

5-If you study closely the psychology of the average Briton (Who

have not been told yet that his Britain have ALREADY killed more

71

71



Page 72 of 82

people than the Nazis ever did )You will see him having a grudging

feeling of being short changed that they(the Brits)did not kill as

many as the Germans !Indicating the existence of An involuntary

Motivating Force inside him !A Concrete Scientific Evidence that

this average Briton Carry A Charge inside driving him consciously

or otherwise to satisfy the constant of the equation numerically i.e.

by striving to kill as many as their next door ! ? !

************************

72

72



Page 73 of 82

73

73



Page 74 of 82

74

74



Page 75 of 82

75

75



Page 76 of 82

76

76



Page 77 of 82

Examples and Applications.

The Multiplier. =m j - nk

Most of the methods and equations described in this book were

borrowed from the methods of mathematical physics when solutions

sometimes are pulled out of the blue so to speak ! Then tested to see

if it was the correct solution! Its called(Back tracking).

Similarly we related economical classes ! Their behaviour !! And

the outcome of their behaving !!!By assigning values such as (n1 ?

n2 ? n3 ? etc! )These values may seem to be too arbitrary! Unfair or

Unfounded !until we plug in some economical values in to the

equations scattered through out this book such as the one above to

see what happens?

77

77



Page 78 of 82

.

LTV=Labour Theory of Value.

R=Rate Of Profit. S=Surplus value K= Fixed(Not Constant) Capital.

In Chapters Nine And Ten Karl Marx Struggled With The Value –

Price-Labour Relationships introducing as first approximation R(r i ?

r j ? r k ?)=S/K ? Eventually he left the issue unresolved and quite

rightly so because its like rocket science too many variables and

Never Enough Integral Equations. So did Adam Smith recognising

the complexity of the issues involved (Both Marx and Smith Were

not mathematicians but Maynard Keynes was).

They all seems to have had underestimated the complexity of the

calculations involved !

For where does ( R ) goes ?How its distributed ?How its invested?

Reinvested ?The flow of money locally and globally ? etc? etc ??

They are all complicated series(es)Each with life of its own! All

concurrent ! And none congruent !!

78

78



Page 79 of 82

However in this book you will come across many equations offering

simple but clearer guidance to explore any uncharted opportunities

offered as in My second approximation .e.g.

R(r i ?r j ? r k ?)= ∑ S i,j,k . / K i,j,k. Where The Multiplier ( ) As

defined above.

Its left up to the reader’s insight !expertise! And versatility to plug

whatever economical or social numbers in to the equations offered

by this book :

1-How can we relate (r-the rate of profit)to Maxwell - Boltzmann

distribution? And to the equations inside this book such as the one

above ?

2-Is this the reason ? Why we left (m&n )Deliberately undefined as

mass or whatsoever? The Multiplier =m j - nk (In this particular

case : i,j.k. Are time ordered. )

79

79



Page 80 of 82

3- If you plug the values in to the appropriate equation from this

book would it be nearer to reality than the extremely complex

equations familiar to economists relating quantities such as:

Price Of Production To Value To Labour etc?etc??

4- How can you fit the global tendencies for R(Rate of Profits)In to

the General picture of:

Stated at the beginning of this chapter?

(See ?Hasok Chang Inventing Temperature :

Measurement And Scientific Progress -Oxford -2004.) ?

Also See:

(Francoise Quesnajin (1759) And The French Economists Known

As The Physiocrats.) ??

Also See:

( Forebenius Mathematical Models.) ? ? ?

80

80



Page 81 of 82

By Definition:

1-Every thing in the universe is quantifiable! The question is how

?

2-There are no Massless particles ! If we perceive or conceive it

to exist then it must have mass(Including Photons.)!!The

problem is that of measurements?

3- No speed in the universe is constant ! The Answer is in the

question : Why?

4-Every geometrical line in the universe that is not

mathematically trivial represent concrete physical existence! The

issue is that of cutting and gluing the line simultaneously ?

5- There are (At Least)As many life forms as the number of

elements in the Mendeleev table If Not More !Except that no

physical contacts are allowed ?

81

81



Page 82 of 8282

Documents

Summary 77 Pages