Summary Sifrol Farmakologi

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Summary Sifrol Farmakologi

Citation preview

  • Summary Presentation

    Pramipexole (Sifrol Mirapex)Parkinsons DiseaseBoehringer Ingelheim GmbH

  • Issues: Medical Management of PDEarly Disease

    * Establish symptomatic control* Avoid motor complications* Modify progression

    Advanced Disease

    *Maintain symptomatic control*Control motor-complications*Control non-motor complications

  • Dyskinesias and motor fluctuations in a community-based study of PD (Schrag et al, 2000)

    R E S U L T S*Dyskinesias in 28 % of the patients

    *Motor fluctuations in 40 % of the patients

    *Predictors for the evolution of motor fluctuations:- Disease duration- LD dose

    *Predictors for the evolution of dyskinesias:- Duration of treatment

  • Levodopa-induced Dyskinesias in Early Onset PDDuration of LD % of pts. with dyskinesiasQuinn et al, 1987. (N=40) Schrag et al, 1998. (N = 99)6 mths 41 % .2 years 63 % .5 years 94 % 91 %6 years 100 % .> 10 years .100 %

  • Shortcomings of L-DOPAPharmacological- pro-drug- absorption and transport failure- short half-life- oxidative metabolism (?)

    Clinical- short duration of action- motor complications- no effect on progression

  • Advantages of Dopamine agonists in the treatment of PD*Direct DA-receptor-stimulation*D1-/D2-subspecificity *No transport competition (GI-tract, BBB)*Longer half-life than levodopa (Ropinirole, Pramipexole, Pergolide, Cabergoline)*No oxidative metabolism*Neuroprotection in vitro- radical scavenging- antioxidative action- antiapoptotic action

  • Pramipexole* Is Associated With a Lower Risk of Developing Motor Complications Compared With Levodopa (2 Years Results)01020304050600200400600800*All pramipexole-treated patients, including those with levodopa supplementation. Parkinson Study Group. JAMA. 2000;284:1931-1938.Days From RandomisationPatients with motor complications (%)P
  • CALM-PD: Pramipexole vs LevodopaDyskinesiaWearing OffOn-off Effects*P = .01.P = .001.P = .11.Incidence of Major Motor Complications at 2 Years*

  • Levodopa Induces a Higher Incidence of Dyskinesia Than Dopamine Agonist TherapyCALM-PD2 yrCabaser 095 yrRequip 0565 yr50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0Patients with dyskinesia Adapted from Hubble J. Neurology. 2002;58(suppl 1):S42-S50.LevodopaPramipexoleCabergolineRopinirole

  • Dopamine Agonists vs Levodopa:Adverse Effect (%)50204.828.432.2612323.37.336.7104.3179.3Hallucinations326.52232.4Somnolence 4037.4 3936.4NauseaPelmopet4Peg LDCabaser 093CAB LDRequip 0562ROP LDCALM-PD1PRX LDAEsROP = ropinirole; CAB = cabergoline; PRX = pramipexole; Peg = pergolide; LD = levodopa.

    Parkinson Study Group. JAMA. 2000;284:1931-1938.Rascol O, et al. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1484-1491.Rinne UK, et al. Neurology. 1997;48:363-368.Oertel WH. Mov Disord. 2000;15(suppl 3):4, Abstract M86.

  • Dopamine Agonists as initial monotherapy in PD - Results from long-term RCTs - -Significantly less motor complications compared to L-Dopa

    -About one third remain on agonist monotherapy over 3 - 5 years -Symptomatic efficacy less than with L-Dopa (? clinical relevance)

    -Increased incidence of hallucinosis compared to levodopa

  • Evidence-based review of PD therapiesEfficacy of DA-Agonists*Prevention of disease progression--> insufficient evidence

    *Symptomatic control--> efficacious: DHEC, Bromocriptine, Cabergoline, Pergolide, Ropinirole, Pramipexole--> likely efficacious: Apomorphine, Lisuride--> insufficient evidence: PiribedilMDS-Review, Movement Disorders 2002; 17, Suppl. 4

  • Preclinical rationale and evidence for the use of DA in PDT. Shapira

  • Potential disease modifying effects of DADA are capable of reducing cell death in a variety of model systems in response to a range of toxinsMTPTrotenonehydroxydopaminelevodopadopamine

  • Protective properties of pramipexoleIn neuronal cell cultures against a range of toxinsNeuroprotective action in primate and rodent models of MPTP toxicity

  • Mechanism of action of PPX mediated neuroprotection not yet fully understoodPPX is capable of blocking the pathway to apoptosisPPX may directly act upon mitochondrial permeabilityEffects of PPX may be independent of the DA receptor

  • Imaging data from long-term studies with dopamine agonistsKenneth L. Marek, MD

  • Outcome Measures for PD: NeuroprotectionPrimary CNS Process

    Compensatory CNS Processes

    Functional/Motor ConsequencesImaging

    Motor RatingsClinical Milestones Assessment

  • Neuroimaging Assessment of PD Progression DAT--CIT, CFT, IPT6%-11% reduction/yearStaffen et al, J Neural Transm, 2000Nurmi et al, Mov Disord, 2000 Marek et al, Neurology, 2001Pirker et al, Mov Disord, 2002Chouker et al, Nucl Med Commun, 2001 FDOPA7%-13% reduction/yearMoorish et al, Brain, 1996Nurmi et al, Ann Neurol, 2001

  • CALM-PD CIT: GoalsTo assess the effect of initial pramipexole or carbidopa levodopa treatment on percentage change from baseline in striatal [123I]-CIT uptake, a marker of dopamine transporter density, in a cohort of early PD patients during a 4-year period

  • CALM-PD CIT: RationaleDopamine transporter imaging with [123I]-CIT/SPECT is a biomarker for PD onset, severity, and progressionIn vitro and animal studies suggest that pramipexole may protect and that levodopa may either protect or damage dopamine neurons

  • Study DesignScreen Baseline Scan Month 22 Scan Week 10 Scan CALM- CITCALM- PD821378Study DrugMonth 34 Scan Month 46 Scan 7165

  • Percentage Change in Striatal -CIT Uptake from Baseline by Treatment30201001001020304050Scan Interval (mo)LevodopaPramipexole(39)(36)(35)(33)(32)(39)% Change from Baseline

  • Correlation of Percentage Change in Striatal CIT Uptake and Changein Off UPDRS22 mo34 mo46 mo (n = 78)(n = 71)(n = 65)Striatumr = 0.01 r = 0.30r = 0.40 P = .94 P = .01P = .001

  • ConclusionsPatients initially treated with pramipexole demonstrated a reduction in the percentage loss from baseline of striatal [123I]-CIT uptake, a marker of dopamine neuron degeneration, of approximately 40% compared with those initially treated with levodopa during a 46-month evaluation period

  • CALM - PD Pramipexole versus Levodopa in Early Parkinsons Disease: A 4-Year Randomized Controlled TrialConceived and Conducted by the Parkinson Study Group

    University of Rochester Rochester, New York

  • ObjectivesTo compare initial treatment with pramipexole vs levodopa in early Parkinsons disease (PD) with respect to: The development of:Dopaminergic complicationsOther adverse events, and Changes in:Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)Quality of life (QOL)

  • Study DesignEscalation PhaseFollow-up Period 1Follow-up Period 2Total Follow-up Time: 4 yrs to 4 yrs-10 moOct. 96Aug. 01Feb. 00

  • Outcome VariablesTime to first motor complication:Dyskinesias, wearing-off, or on-offSeverity of dyskinesiasAdverse eventsUPDRSPart I (mental), Part II (ADL), Part III (motor)Quality of lifeEuroQol PDQUALIF

  • Treatment Effects on Dopaminergic Endpoints Pramipexole Levodopa (n=151) (n=150)Endpoints % % P-ValueFirst Dopaminergic Compl 52 74
  • 52%74%Dyskinesia, Wearing Off, or On-Off Effects

  • 54%24%

  • Reasons for Termination Somnolence 111Edema 60Dyskinesias 03 Worsened PD Symptoms 88Nausea/Vomiting 46Mental Issues (hallucinations, confusion, other) 4 4

    Lost Interest 108Lost to Follow-up 11Other Symptoms & Comorbidities16 12Did Not Consent to Extension 8768 50 Pramipexole Levodopa

  • ConclusionsInitial pramipexole reduced the 4-year risk of developing the first dopaminergic event (p < .0001), dyskinesias (p < .0001) and wearing off (p = .02).

  • ConclusionsInitial levodopa associated with greater improvement in total (p = .008), motor (p = .01), and ADL (p = .03) subscales of the UPDRS.

  • ConclusionsInitial pramipexole associated with more somnolence, edema, and cellulitis.

    Comparable effects of initial pramipexole or levodopa on quality of life scores.

  • Should I start my PD patients on levodopa or pramipexole?Pramipexole or Levodopa treatment optionsLevodopa Superior symptomatic UPDRS benefitLess somnolence and edemaPramipexole Reduced dopaminergic motor complications Slower decline in dopamine transporter loss as measured by -CIT SPECT uptake

    This image represents the pre and postsynaptic dopamine receptors. B-CIT binds to the presynaptic receptor at the dopamine transporter site (shown here in green).

    The distribution and intensity of radioactivity as measured by SPECT is a marker for the number of functioning nerve cells in the substantia nigra.